Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Exec's New Startup 'Open Water' Targets Wearable Brain Imaging (xconomy.com)

gthuang88 writes: Display-tech guru Mary Lou Jepsen is leaving her post at Facebook/Oculus to work on a new startup called Open Water. Jepsen, a veteran of Google X and the MIT Media Lab, says the company will develop wearable MRI devices that could help doctors do early detection of cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Inspired in part by musician Peter Gabriel, Open Water also hopes to use advances in neural imaging and brain-machine interfaces to create a system for reading and communicating human thoughts electronically. She believes there's huge potential in the manufacturing plants in Asia that are primarily used to make OLEDs and LCDs. "My big bet is we can use that manufacturing infrastructure to create the functionality of a $5 million MRI machine in a consumer electronics price-point wearable. And the implications of that are so big." At that price-point, every doctor's office in the world could afford such a device and use it to detect early stages of neurodegenerative disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease, internal bleeding, blood clots, and more.

90 comments

  1. Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How?

    The magnet field emitted by an MRI is so powerful it can cause metal objects to fly through the air and damage the machine. By what magic of DSP voodoo do they propose to shrink a machine which makes a Microwave Oven look like an LED flashlight by comparison down to a "wearable" size/price?

    Does it use the earth's magnetic field with an extremely long "shutter time"? If so: how do they address the target moving while the continuous "exposure" is recording? Where is this data being cached and how is it getting off the wearable and into the cloud?

    1. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by plopez · · Score: 4, Funny

      You don't "get it". It's the cloud, machine learning, BYOD, data analytics, open sourced, sharing, wearable social media.

      Think outside the box! Who needs those pesky old sk3wl laws of physics? We can do it better than a bunch of old l4m3rz.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it can never happen

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead%E2%80%93acid_battery
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_polymer_battery
      http://www.optimumpowerservices.com/optimum-power-services/an-early-history-of-transformers/

      Are you going to tell me my cell-phone is more powerful than the computers on the Apollo mission next?
      Why don't you tell me an anecdote about NASA's platinum space pens vs Russia using a pencil while you're at it?

    4. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh yeah, a Facebook exec starting a spinoff company that targets my brainwaves....that sounds just wonderful. I'm sure they'd never use it for advertising or anything like that.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't "get it". It's the cloud, machine learning, BYOD, data analytics, open sourced, sharing, wearable social media.

      You forgot to mention the synergistic, holographic, customer-facing social-centric envisioneers that will proactively optimize the structuring matrix.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    6. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by plopez · · Score: 1

      It's a different situation. I's not just about making things smaller it is about energy. How do you reduce the amount of energy required to penetrate flesh and bone. X-ray machines are still quite large because the power and wavelength needs are fixed.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    7. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It's about energy density... I believe the number is not a typo...

      I am not saying this facebook thing isn't a gimmick, just that someday it will be plausible. Or that there are other ways of measuring and mapping brain activity.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Earth-field NMRs do exist. Personally, I don't want to wear a huge coil around my head, it would clash with my tin foil hat.

    9. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Earth-field NMRs do exist.

      Maybe. NMR doesn't require a gradient field for obtaining spatial information. MRI, on the other hand, does require a gradient field, unless you're content with having only one voxel in your image.

    10. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Ihlosi · · Score: 2

      It's not a matter of computational power. Sure, your cellphone has more CPU horsepower than what they used to get to the moon ... but it still doesn't fly to the moon because it doesn't come with a Saturn V rocket. It's a hardware ... thing.

    11. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Uecker · · Score: 1

      Earth-field MRIs do exist too.
      http://www.magritek.com/produc...

      Ofcourse, it takes 4 hours to get a blurry image of a fruit (which does not move).

    12. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Earth-field MRIs do exist too.

      ... which use Earths magnetic field as the primary field, but still use coils to generate the secondary (gradient) field.

    13. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you need to see is "MIT Media Lab" in the summary. The Medial Lab is a place full of people who have an utter lack of down-to-earth reasoning. Just the name should give you a clue, "Media Lab": they aren't known for their ability in, say, physics research. Everything after that is sequelae.

    14. Re: Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How? Really? Look at your cell phone and then think back to when less powerful computers were the size of your bedroom...

    15. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      This is exactly my question. Its also an interesting one with implications beyond brain scans if this isn't BS. I do smell the distinct odor of BS here.

      If it's for real, maybe they use a less powerful magnetic field and a much more sensitive receiver. Noise can be cancelled by stacking (as in astrophotography) many scans and processing with the new generation of graphics cards. Perhaps they are using scanning radio beams tuned to the resonant frequencies of specific elements to be scanned in place of the strong magnetic fields. Because of the relatively low frequencies and super long wavelengths involved, this is not easy.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    16. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not. You're still posting shit that has no analogy to the topic at hand.

    17. Re: Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Desler · · Score: 1

      That doesn't actually answer the question. Care to try again?

    18. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You don't need a fancy graphics card to stack images. It's done in regular MRI all the time too. The problem is, signal to noise ratio goes up approximately linearly with field strength, but recovering that SNR by averaging takes N^2 images, which take N^2 time to acquire.

    19. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Uecker · · Score: 1

      Sure, and RF-coils too (as does NMR), but RF-coils and gradient coils generate relatively small fields. The point is that you do not need a huge superconducting magnet to do MRI.

    20. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get how the cloud, machine learning, BYOD, data analytics, open sourced, sharing, wearable social media has ANYTHING to do with making MRI work with OLED and LCD technology. You need a STRONG magnetic field in order to perform fMRI. No amount of big data is going to overcome physics.

    21. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking. I was just theorizing that with something like the new kepler nvidia cards you might be able to process a pipeline of images as they were rapidly acquired to reduce gargantuan data storage requirements.

      The far bigger challenge in my mind is the rf section of the system. It's inconceivable that a wearable mri could have a conventional MRI mechanism with a mechanical shutter. It would have to be a phased array with a synthetic aperture. That would enable a rapid scanning, but the big problem with that is the long wavelengths of the signal from the excited nuclei.

      Can you think of a way to solve that problem?

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    22. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you guys are just trolling

    23. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by kencurry · · Score: 1

      Nano. It's got to have nano or I am not a believer.

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    24. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      If it's not "tactical" I'm not interested.

    25. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "The point is that you do not need a huge superconducting magnet to do [low-resolution] MRI [on stationary objects]."

    26. Re: Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe T-Waves? Or some kind of Ultrasound technology?

      You're right tho an affordable MRI machine sounds like a nice way to carry around with a lethal magnet, I assume she has some idea of what she's doing tho. I hope lol.

    27. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by messymerry · · Score: 1

      Inverse square law. A current MRi is big enough to put your body in the cavity. A small unit would be right against your scalp. Plus, we have some extraordinarily strong magnets available to augment the fields generated by the unit. I don't think this is impossible, but I bet the battery life will be in the toilet...

      --
      Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
    28. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      A current MRi is big enough to put your body in the cavity. A small unit would be right against your scalp

      The current MRI isn't just so large because it need to generate strong magnetic fields, but also because it requires magnetic fields with known and controllable gradients (to recover spatial information and to keep the MR signal within the frequency range the device is best suited to pick up).

      The inverse square law isn't useful here, because the object of the MRI scan is located where field strength is mostly constant, not far enough away from the magnet that field strength drops of with the square of distance (which would also imply that field strength varies considerably and nonlinear from one point of the object to another).

    29. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Failbook dabbling in brain stuff.

      Yeah, what could POSSIBLY go wronEEERRRKKKK!

      ***You have been banned from Life because you violated Failbook's Community Standards.***

    30. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by martinfb · · Score: 1

      Maybe not advertising. YET - your brain will be scanned to what you could be coerced into 'needing'!

      --


      Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
    31. Re:Incredible Claims Require Incredible Evidence by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      And include VR.
      And be 3D printed.
      And be sold by Elon Musk.

  2. Great name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to never being on the front page of search results!

  3. Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MRIs since they're so profitable.

    1. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But atleast your maple syrup is the best and cheapest in the world.

    2. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only had to wait two weeks after my motorcycle accident. You're exaggerating. Of course, that was after my legs already set incorrectly so the doctor had to reveal my legs, but I only had to pay for parking at the hospital.

    3. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent syrup and great Canadian bacon are reasons why you guys need so much healthcare. ;)

    4. Re: Republicans love... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      No lines here meanwhile, because we can't afford most of our own technology.

    5. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dying or buying transportation to the US. I got an MRI within 30 minutes of arriving at a Seattle hospital after my accident in Richmond, BC. I was fortunate enough to be able to afford the ride and the medical care. My doctor at Richmond General recommended going to Seattle for immediate care.

    6. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean rebreak. My iPhone keeps changing that to seemingly random words.

      I transferred from a hospital in Windsor to one in Detroit to get faster care after a car accident.

    7. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dying or buying transportation to the US. I got an MRI within 30 minutes of arriving at a Seattle hospital after my accident in Richmond, BC. I was fortunate enough to be able to afford the ride and the medical care. My doctor at Richmond General recommended going to Seattle for immediate care.

      I was transferred from Peace Arch Hospital in Canada just north of the border to Overlake Hospital in Bellevue, WA after a bad motorcycle accident. They rolled me straight in from the ambulance to a CAT scan. The first doctor I talked to said that would have probably taken three or more weeks had I stayed in Canada. I'm glad I agreed to doing it since the scan showed a pelvis fracture that didn't show-up in my first set of x-rays.

    8. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      75% of the population of Canada loves within 100 miles of the US border. It's great having that when you need immediate care.

    9. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $5,000 for two minutes of the doctor's time to look at the results is a ripoff.

    10. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've confused Canada with the VA.

    11. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *booking flights to Canadian border*

      Shut up, I'm lonely and Vr porn isn't doing it for me anymore.

    12. Re: Republicans love... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah the medical industry sells the perception of the possibility eternal life.

      so we overspend on medical and underspend on kids.

      the farmers of afghanistan have the last laugh.

      our culture is seriously sick.

  4. failing upwards, I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OLPC - check

    Pixel Qi - check

    Google X "Lego Display Wall" - check

    She seems to have made a career out associating with big names, making big promises, and then not delivering much. And wishing a low cost MRI to happen isn't the same as actually making it happen. That takes working engineers, not executives who used to be engineers once.

    1. Re: failing upwards, I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's a woman, what did you expect?

    2. Re: failing upwards, I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've met her before. She's a networker and an insanely hard worker (aided by a limited need for sleep), but not a visionary... Or at least not a very good one. To her credit, she's successfully taken ideas from concept to reality, but nothing thats ever really had a lasting impact. Innovating without understanding the fundamentals of the problem you're trying to solve tends to end in products that miss the mark.

  5. Oh Peter, you Naive Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps we will need to create âoeswimming lessonsâ to teach us how to be comfortable being open, honest and exposedâ"that we can be ready to float and navigate in these waters of visible thought.

    I like Peter Gabriel, probably a lot more than the next guy likes PG. But he is being hopelessly naive. No human will ever be comfortable with that level of exposure. Its the destruction of self, the loss of the last bastion of privacy and thus dignity. It might be OK for short periods of time, like a sort of digital LSD trip. But that's about it.

    If this tech ever gets that sophisticated we are going to need lessons in the opposite - how to jam it so that our thoughts can not be surreptitiously (or forcibly) taken from us.

    Some retro-techno that is right on the nose:
    X-Dream - X-Ray Eyes (album: We Interface)
    This is a promise, this is a threat
    X-ray eyes

    This is a promise, this is a threat
    Of a device, capturing your mind
    Brain scanning machines, discerning thoughts
    Original blueprints, replicating imprints

    X-ray eyes are electric
    X-ray eyes, x-ray analyze
    X-ray eyes, x-ray strike the target
    X-ray eyes, x-ray eyes read your mind

    And just for good measure:
    X-Dream: We Interface

    Monitoring devices
    Know where you go
    Mass media
    Total control

    Digital delight
    Desire in megabyte
    Data overflow
    Virtual suicide

    This information
    Is dinformation
    Truth is hidden
    Knowledge forbidden

    Structures, powers
    to delegate
    To speak is to lie
    To lie is to collaborate

    Information streams
    Simulating dreams
    Interactive mind control
    Systematic overflow

    1. Re: Oh Peter, you Naive Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im not convinced. If everyones thoughts were open we would quickly understand crazy and rude thoughts happen involuntarily every hour of every day. Rather than the extreme PC shit we have today that isn't based on reality. We have all thought about killing people, with the majority of such thoughts never acted upon or even accepted within our own ethically code.

      Much the same as being naked, there are tribes without clothes and yet most people swear less clothing leads to the devil. We adapt to most situations, our brain thrives on that
       

    2. Re: Oh Peter, you Naive Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understanding that everybody thinks crazy things has nothing to do with it.

      It is about having a place that is yours and yours alone. Where you are yourself and shared with no one else. Imagine how shitty it would be to not have a home, no place in the world that was just yours. Now imagine what it would be like not to have any thoughts that were just yours. Your fears, your hopes, your dreams and your schemes none of that yours any more.

      Even naked tribesmen have the ability to go off into the forest all by themselves.

    3. Re: Oh Peter, you Naive Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody forces you to bring the Sucker Device into the forest and update your status from there.

      also nobody forces burgers and coke and kebaps into you.

      use you effing brain, learn to fry a schnitzel and stop voting for the agitprop specialists.

    4. Re: Oh Peter, you Naive Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also stop being a dumb europie. other civilizations can only laugh about our kind of naivetee and helplessness.

      as an example: you could piss off your 1% ers by moving to minsk, st petersburg or beijing. if you have serious qualifications, there will be a better life waiting for you.

      as long as you stay in their stable, they thibk you are their victim and treat you accordingly.

      grow up, grow balls, look for new options.

    5. Re: Oh Peter, you Naive Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see that you prefer to be autistic and ignore the words written. Either that or you are just an angry jack-off.

      As long as you choose to have a strawman argument then you will win the battle and lose the war. Enjoy not having any privacy except when you have the time to go into the forest.

  6. Awesome Tool For The Thought Police by De_Boswachter · · Score: 1

    This has the potential to be an awesome lie detector. Not as clumsy and ineffective as a polygraph. I can see the beginning of a wonderful friendship between FB and the DoD.

    1. Re:Awesome Tool For The Thought Police by tgv · · Score: 1

      You can fool it in the same way as a polygraph.

    2. Re: Awesome Tool For The Thought Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pffft
        zuckerbug already fulfilled his mission.

      now he wants extra kudos.

    3. Re:Awesome Tool For The Thought Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SJWs will love this.

    4. Re:Awesome Tool For The Thought Police by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      and use it to detect early stages of neurodegenerative disease, cancer, independent thinking, critical thinking, and a propensity to vote against the ruling party

      FTFY

  7. The PTB rely on HUMAN FLESH in the FOOD SUPPLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PTB rely on HUMAN FLESH in the FOOD SUPPLY to maintain their human appearance

    Human flesh exists in a lot of foods today. Sometimes it makes the news. These are PTB slip ups, and/or conditioning this reality.

    They rely on the consumption of human flesh to retain their human appearance. They all have the same scent. They exist from the bottom to the top of the pyramid. Some are bums, some are middle/upper class, some are those dancing for you on TV, in a web of deceit to keep your mind and body occupied.

    If you want to try and let one of them know that you know what they are, you might say to them:

    "This hamburger is really quite human"
    (inhale deeply) "This planet is filled with creatures which all smell the same"
    "I hope you enjoyed your flesh burger"
    "How long did your last regeneration period last?"
    "What office do you work for?"

    1. Re:The PTB rely on HUMAN FLESH in the FOOD SUPPLY by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      P.T. Barnum?

    2. Re: The PTB rely on HUMAN FLESH in the FOOD SUPPLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boy, homo sapiens can be nasty enough.

      just become a banker and you will learn what i mean.

      but dont despair, there are others who keep them in check.

      all i would kindly ask you is to be a bit more cautious and to support those who keep the maniacs in check.

      also, please meet a girl and drink a bottle of your favourite ethanol drink.

      vodka, schnaps, whiskey, raki will do.

  8. What's the point? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

    and use it to detect early stages of neurodegenerative disease, cancer, cardiovascular disease, internal bleeding, blood clots, and more.

    We already know the detrimental effects of smoking, doing drugs, being obese, not eating a somewhat healthy diet, lack of exercise and so on yet people continue to do all of the above and more.

    If the trillions we've already spent stating the obvious haven't worked, restating them in a different form isn't going to matter.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  9. Very Funny, Mr Zuckerberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can now read the mind of your victims ?

    Well, I would argue you can already do for most of your victims simply by datamining the stuff they have supplied you for free. Nicely attached to a police-identifiable mobile phone number.

    So that you and your 1% friends can always crack down on each of your victims, should the need arise.

    Folks, what we need is Freedom Computers, not Electronic Shackles.

    Here is a small contribution towards this:
    https://github.com/YuriSuchoi/RandomNumberSource/wiki

  10. 'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Right. So a 'display tech guru' bets that they can cram a device that a) generates magnetic fields in the single-digit tesla range and that b) basically relies on, electromagnetically speaking, hearing grass grow (and therefore requires a room with relative EM silence) and that c) for a certain range of examinations relies on stuff being injected into the patient, into a safe, wearable, customer-friendly, gadget-priced device.

    My prognosis as a medical device engineer is that they'll manage maybe one of those four ...

    Oh, and btw, MRIs are cheap, fast and plentiful today. I've experienced a time when that wasn't the case, when there were two devices in the whole country and a month-long waiting list based on how interesting your case is. And the examination took over three hours, compared to just under 30 minutes today. If anyone claims that MRIs are too expensive today, my guess is that they're in country with a backwater health insurance system. Which could be fixed more easily than cramming a medical-grade MRI into a gadget form factor.

    1. Re:'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by tgv · · Score: 1

      Last time I had a course, they still cost quite a lot to operate because of Helium leakage, and the special requirements for their environment (magnetic shielding and all), and they cost a couple of M$ to begin with. That's 8 years ago now, but I haven't heard of anything except measures to limit Helium leakage.

    2. Re: 'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      So.. What you are saying is the solution is for everyone to pay a major part of their income as health insurance tax so they don't directly see there large amount they are paying for MRI?
      Innovative.. But I don't quite see how hiding the cost makes them cheap.. Do you?
      Thought not.

    3. Re: 'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But I don't quite see how hiding the cost makes them cheap..

      The rest of the world does.

    4. Re:'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by ChumpusRex2003 · · Score: 4, Informative

      EM shielding is still essential, and nothing has really developed to change this. The signals are incredibly weak, and extensive RF shielding is required. To give an example, an incandescent light bulb in the scanner room which is reaching end-of-life can produce so much RF from micro-arcs on the failing filament that it can completely swamp the signal.

      Capital cost is still very high, typically in the region of $1.5 million for a 1.5T machine, and $2.5-3 million for a 3T machine. Capital costs for the more capable machines are going up due to various developments - e.g. parallel receiver channels (up to 256 channels in the latest machines), parallel transmit channels with higher pulse powers (currently 2x 40 kW RF power amps and transmit antennas, but systems with 4 or 8 transmit channels are in development). Not to mention that there is a push towards larger dimension magnets, which substantially increase the capital cost.

      There has also been considerable development in new algorithms for faster imaging, by using incomplete or overlapped imaging acquisitions, which requires extremely complex mathematical processing. CT scanners went through this development a few years ago to improve quality and reduce radiation dose, and image reconstruction went from a 1 ms task running in software, to a 250 ms task running on a 20U rack packed with $250k+ of GPUs. It is likely that the next generation of MRI scanners will use similar compute hardware.

      All MRI scanners made in the last 5 years are zero-helium loss, so should not require any top-up of helium. However, they do need heavy chillers to recondense the helium - chillers with cooling powers of up to 1 W are now routinely used, which bring with them energy costs of around $20-30k per year. Many manufacturers also offer helium-free magnets (essentially the magnet coils are bonded to a giant copper/aluminium thermal mass, which is bonded to a cryochiller), these are substantially more expensive in capital cost, and energy cost, and much less tolerant to power failure. However, for areas where helium fills are impractical or too expensive, then these are a viable option.

    5. Re:'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by tgv · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      I remember the panic at the institute where I worked when there was a power failure and the emergency power didn't function. It came not really close to the moment where the Helium would be vented, but it was rather tense.

    6. Re: 'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you ignore the evidence that shows that health care costs per capita is much higher in the US and people don't have to choose between getting treatments and bankruptcy in other first-world countries because of socialized medicine. And despite what the Rush Limbaughs of the world claim almost none of those people want the US care health system over the on me in their country. But don't let facts get in the way or anything.

    7. Re: 'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world keeps costs down by, among other things, simply not paying for MRIs. In the US, if you go in for any kind of back pain, one of the first things doctors do is order an MRI. In Europe, they might give you an X-ray, if you're lucky. More likely, they'll ask you some questions, palpate you, and send you home with a generic medication. This is from first-hand experience.

      Also, if you look at that graph carefully, you'll see that there is no, or negative, benefit from more spending beyond $2000/person in all nations, despite the suggestive but utterly bogus logarithmic fit.

    8. Re: 'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world keeps costs down by, among other things, simply not paying for MRIs.

      [citation needed] And by citation I mean to actual evidence, not the ramblings of some right-wing blog, an outlet like Faux News, or blowhard like Limbaugh.

    9. Re:'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by ChumpusRex2003 · · Score: 1

      Helium has a very low latent heat of vaporization. As a result, an uncompensated heat flux of 1 W into the cryostat will boil off about 15 litres of helium per hour.

      With most MRI magnets only holding a spare inventory of under 300 litres, there would be a significant risk of quench if power could not be restored within 24 hours or so.

      For this reason, backup generator power for the chillers is strongly recommended for MRI systems, even if generator power is not provisioned for the operation of the scanner itself (up to 150kW for the RF and gradient amplifiers, with extremely rapid load rise times and as these are precision electronic systems, the generator needs to be able to maintain adequate voltage regulation under this very difficult load). This is the case at my hospital. We have 4 MRI scanners, but we only sufficient generator provision for the chillers, and not for the scanners themselves.

    10. Re:'Display tech guru' ... um okay. by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the insightful and informative comment. I hope this reaches +5 soon, it surprised me a little that it's not there already (currently at +2 with 76 comments in the thread) though I may be too enthusiastic.

  11. Meh, I'll wait until it's injectable into eyeballs by melted · · Score: 2

    Meh, I'll wait until it's injectable into eyeballs.

  12. Pixel Qi made actual products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew that name sounded familiar. Well, Pixel Qi produced some actual products. It turns out the price of LCDs fell, and the consumer has higher expectations for display quality. The military liked the tech, but that wasn't enough.

  13. Vulcan Mind Meld? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the first step toward developing Vulcan mind meld technology. All one needs is a magnet capable of synchronizing the neural impulses between the parties..

    No doubt many can't wait to mind meld with Donald Trump in an effort to lower their collective IQ even further than might be possible using conventional technology.

  14. Here's how by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    The magnetic field of an MRI determines the wavelength of the absorbed/re-emitted signal. MRIs use high-strength magnetic fields to get the higher precision that comes from using shorter wavelengths.

    You can make an MRI that sits on your desktop. See "The Amateur Scientist" by C.L. Strong for an example.

    The big issue with MRIs is uniformity of the magnetic field. Since the signal is dependent on the field strength, any variation in this strength results in signals of a different frequency. MRIs are traditionally big in order to have uniform magnetic fields in the cylindrical chamber.

    We've actually come a long way in processing algorithms as well. For example, this project is attempting to make a desktop MRI using structured-light algorithms to compensate for the field variation.

    Perhaps Mary Lou Jepson did due dilligence before embarking on this venture.

  15. Manuel Rodriguez Delgado by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    By what magic of DSP voodoo do they propose to shrink a machine which makes a Microwave Oven look like an LED flashlight by comparison down to a "wearable" size/price?

    So, miniaturization...this is where I think the core concept of the (fallacious) 'Moore's Law' actually can be seen in effect.

    What I mean is, though it is not any kind of formula or 'law', we can see a very idetifiable trend towards making our tech smaller. It's so clear and consistent it's about as close to 'certain' as these kinds of things can be.

    The software is there...most of our limitations are hardware...usually battery weight, as boring as it sounds.

    I think we will see fMRI applications for consumer products fairly soon, and in general BCI stuff will get smaller.

    Have a look at the work of Manue Rodrigeuz Delgado from the 60s and 70s with BCI and just R/F tech...it will blow your mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  16. More spying and privacy violating! by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Open Water also hopes to use advances in neural imaging and brain-machine interfaces to create a system for reading and communicating human thoughts electronically

    Feasibility of any such device aside.. I don't for a second believe that this is being worked on to benefit medical science, it's just an attack on pretty much the last place you can have privacy: Your own thoughts. Them, them, FUCK THEM, and their privacy-invading bullshit.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  17. Cannot wait... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Cannot wait to see what Peter Gabriel creates with tools like this!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  18. She's probably thinking NIRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing she's talking about creating a NIRS device. It sorta passes as brain imaging, but at a superficial level. There are already that are fairly wearable because all you really need are tunable lasers, or can sacrifice clarity and use LEDs. It's not a whole lot different than using an oximeter.

    NIRS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-infrared_spectroscopy

  19. ÐÐÐÑ ÐÐÑ Ñ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ð ÐÑfмÐÑZ, ÑÑо ÑÑо ÑfÑоÐÐÑ. Ð"ÐÐÐÐÑÐ ÑÐÑÑÑfÐÐÐÑÑOE. ÐÐ Ñf оÐноÐо ÐнÐÐÐÐÐÑfмРнРÐ--ÐмÐÐ, ÐÑомРÑÐÐоÐÐÐÐ, нÐÑ ÑÐÐÑÐÐÐÐÐÐÑоÐÐнноРÐÐÑÑÑ ÐÑÐÑÐРРбоÐÑOEнÐÑ. ÐzÐнÐÐо мноÐÐÐ ÐРнÐÑ... ÐÐÐÑfÑ ÐоÐÐо РбÐРбоÐÐÐнÐÐ. Ð--ÐÑÐм ÐÑÐÐÑfмÑÐÐÑÑOE ÐoeÐÐ, ÐÐÐÐноÑÑÐÐÑf, ÐÑÐРмоÐно ÑÑÐÐÑf ÐÑÐÐÑÐÑÑOE, оÑÑÐмонÑÐÑоÐÐÑÑOE, ÐÐÑÑOE оÑÐÐнÐÐм. ÐÐ Ð--ÐмÐÐ ÐÑÑÑOE ÑÑÐÐÑ, ÐÐÑÐоÐÑ. Ðо ÐÑÑÑOE ÐÐÐÐÑ Ñо ÑÐÑÑоÑÐ. Ð'ÐÑÑOE мÐÑ ÑÐнÑ...ÑонÐÐÐÑоÐÐн ÐоРоÐÑÐÐÐÐÐннÑfÑZ ÑÐÑÑоÑÑf. ÐYÐоРÑf мÐÑÐÑÐ Ð ÐÐÐоÑÐ ÑÐÐÐÐÐÐÐÑÑÑ Ñ...оÑоÑо ÐоÐРмÐмРÑÐоÐоÐнРРÑfÑоÐноÐÐÑÐннÐ. Ð'ÑfÐÑOEÐÐнÑOEÐ Ð ÐÐÐоÑРмÐÑÐÑÐ ÑfÑÐоÐÐÐÐÐÑZÑ ÑÐбÐнÐÐ. ÐÐбÐноРÐмÐÐÑ ÐÐÑÐÐноÑÑÑOE ÐнÐм. Ð'ÑÐ ÑÐнÑ...ÑонÐÐÐÑоÐÐнно. ÐоÐнÑÐ ÐмÐÐÑ ÑÐоÑZ ÑÐÑÑоÑÑf, ÑfÐÐÐÐÑÐÐÑOEно, но ÐоÐÐÐ Ñ ÐÑÐмÐнÐÐ ÑÑÑf ÐÐ ÑÐÑÑоÑÑf Ð

  20. the idea for the smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it is a utopia. Let's talk. None of the individual in the world, in addition to human, there is no specialized caste of doctors and hospitals. However, many of them live long and disease-free. Why invent the MRI, the diagnosis if you can immediately cure, repair, the entire body. there are cycles, periods on Earth. That is some kind of frequency. The whole world is synchronized by a specific frequency. The fetus in the mother in the stomach is progressing well until the mother is calm and balanced. Gurgling in the womb to soothe the child. The child has an activity day. All synchronized. The sun has its own frequency, surprisingly, when I applied the same rate to natural gas, the gas burns completely without flame. It is necessary to analyze the frequency of the sound of water, gurgling stomach, solar frequency with clouds no clouds, in a house with reinforced concrete structures, wood. And to understand what protects us, and it destroys. And maybe we will see a paradox that the gadgets with its frequency can not help us, and murderers. Creator of us, could not accept the idea, that we have someone else cured and that someone will come up with some sort of device that might improve my health. All built into us from birth. Look around. Did you see where any circle. No. Any semblance of the world, have legs, paws, but no circle. With the invention of the wheel, mankind has gone in the way of technological development. It was the most critical error. But you can fix it. Everything in life has vibrations and frequency. Good work simple, ingenious model. The genius in simplicity. Complicated things work, but not for long, they require fixed costs, both financial and physical. The solution to any problem is a way to reduce the problem, if the problem is increasing, so we're going in the wrong direction.
    Dmitry Ageev 614698@mail.ru
    We are pleased to help with their knowledge, experience and ideas.