Slashdot Mirror


Sales Of PCs, Laptops, Tablets Continue to Fall, Hit Lowest Point Since 2011 (canalys.com)

According to the latest numbers provided by marketing research firm Canalys, the shipments of PC devices -- which includes desktops, notebooks, all-in-ones, two-in-ones, and tablets -- amounted to 101 million units in the first quarter of 2016. The number underscores a 13% decline from the same period a year ago, and it is also the lowest volume since the second quarter of 2011. Apple led the chart among PC OEMs, moving 14 million units (suffering 17% fall), followed by Chinese conglomerate Lenovo. HP assumed the third position, with Dell and Samsung closely following it. Tim Coulling, Canalys Senior Analyst said in a press statement: The global PC market had a bad start to 2016 and it is difficult to see any bright spots for vendors in the coming quarters. The tablet boom has faded in the distance and the market is fully mature. Global shipments declines are expected to continue unless vendors bring transformational innovation to the market. Apple and Microsoft are propping up shipments in established markets with their detachables, but price points make them less affordable in low-income countries. Although other vendors are coming to market with cheaper alternatives, they are unlikely to have a big impact on volumes in the short term. The number of people looking to buy their first PC is at an all-time low and 2016 is likely to bring yet more turmoil to global PC vendors.

56 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Saddled with Windows 10 by QuietLagoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why buy a PC when it is saddled with the data harvesting of Windows 10? I do not want Microsoft to be monitoring me and my family via Windows 10.

    1. Re: Saddled with Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And this explains Apple declining more than PCs how?

    2. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by in10se · · Score: 3, Informative

      While you make a good point about the tracking in Windows 10, even the summary states that while Apple sold more units, they also had a bigger decline in sales than the industry as a whole, so you can't chalk this up to Microsoft fear/hate.

      --
      Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
    3. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      after a while (probably soon) any win10 based pc will NOT have drivers for anything lower in the MS domain.

      there may even be issues with linux. I preduct that MS is waging an all out war on linux+osx and will use all their pressure to increase the UEFI secure boot stuff and make it so that we can't disable it. only the higher end boards will allow overriding secure boot. even then, I suspect MS will try their best to force those vendors to turn off that switch, too.

      MS sees the writing on the wall. so does intel, which is why intel is laying off 10k people!

      I used to upgrade my own set of pc's every year or so. I have a stack of mobos here dating from the mid 90's (really hard to throw out working hardware, even if its ancient) and yet I have not bought a new system or board in years. all my systems do what I need and given the tight economy, I can't justify keeping the pc vendors in profits when money is so tight these days.

      tablets have run their course. they simply are not replacements and are definitely LUXURY items. I have no tablets and no plans for any.

      corp america does a pc or laptop 'refresh' every few years for their employees. and people who break their systems need replacements. but people doing non-urgent upgrades are few and far between, these days.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re: Saddled with Windows 10 by MitchDev · · Score: 3, Funny

      "And this explains Apple declining more than PCs how?"

      Overpriced "hipster" items...

    5. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I do not want Microsoft to be monitoring me and my family

      Yeah, that's Google's job!

    6. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by danomac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep, computers are "good enough" for most people now. Heck, I'm still running my quad core from 2008. It still works fine and compiles quickly, I see no reason to upgrade. Even if I did, I'd have to deal with EFI and a bunch of other new things so I'm not in a hurry to upgrade. My laptop on the other hand is getting old and slow (it's probably 10 years old now.) However, I don't use it as much as I used to, so again, not in a hurry to replace it. I use my Nexus 7 (2012) still for most things I'd use the laptop for, and even that is starting to get slow. I'll probably have to replace the tablet soon, but the desktop and laptop will still last for a while.

      I figure when my main PC dies (which will probably be years from now) I'll upgrade.

    7. Re: Saddled with Windows 10 by saloomy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I still use my MacBook Pro Mid-2012. Because it was not upgradable I purchased it with at the time 768GB of Solid State Disk, 16GB of Ram, and the higher end graphics options. It still runs El Capitan really well, and aside from generational CPU differences, there is nothing that makes me look at a 2015 MacBook Pro and makes me think it's worth me parting with $2500. There isn't the ability to add more ram that 16GB (which I use primarily for running various VMs I work on to develop), more internal storage (which is leaps and bounds more than 640k, which honestly should be enough for any body), and has the same display and form factor as the current one does. The battery has recently asked to be serviced, and it came in at 5:30 hours of Netflix at full display, still enough for me since I have multiple chargers and Displays as docks. There is nothing today that makes me think I want a newer one.
      What I would like to see is a MacBook Pro that has thunderbolt 3, a 4K display, MAYBE MAYBE a keyboard from the new MacBook, which I have tried but I'm still undecided on, and an A10 or A11 coprocessor for running apps on a low power mode sparing the big hunking desktop-class skylake CPU. 64GB of ram as a max would be nice, as would 2TB SSDs. I don't need it thinner, as I can comfortably tote this one around now as is. Just give me as much battery as can be.

    8. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      Worse yet, the CPU's from intel have bogged down badly. 4-core i7's are only about 20-25% faster than they were 5 years ago. They are more power efficient by >2x, but most home users don't really care about that. Hell, most have no clue how much power their PC's use (hence the proudly boasted about 1000W supplies for machines that peak out at ~300W).

      SSD's have been the biggest system speed boost in recent years. My new machine 6 months ago barely feels faster than the 9 year old machine with an SSD.

      So why upgrade to a new machine that is barely faster and comes pre-loaded with Big Brother?

    9. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can't chalk all of it up to Microsoft fear/hate, certainly, but that might be one factor.

      One of my own small businesses is a clear example. We would have bought a handful of new laptops and desktop workstations for various people at least 2-3 years ago, but the usual complaints about Windows 8 put us off and we were waiting for 10 to fix the problems. Since 10 is a complete non-starter for that business because of the privacy and robustness concerns (dealing with potentially sensitive information = instant compliance violations if we can't fully control our equipment) we're still making do with 5+ year old machines.

      That's increasingly painful, because we're talking about laptops that now have sub-2 hour battery life if they're not plugged in, several machines that have small, spinning disk storage, and so on. We would drop thousands on new PC hardware in a heartbeat, if someone would just give us anything close to what we actually need, which is basically modern hardware + Windows 7 + a couple of the updates that newer Windows versions do offer to support that modern hardware (USB3, hi-res screens, etc.).

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    10. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by bazorg · · Score: 2

      erm... because outside of Slashdot and tinfoil_hats'r'us, that is not a buying consideration? Everyone in the market already has telemetry in devices they carry in their pockets, and to bed, and to the toilet.

    11. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, 99% of people don't know or care about that, so that's not the cause.

      I'm thinking that a lot of the factors center more along the fact that newer processors aren't bringing a lot more to the table compared with even 5 year old processors. 10 years ago the difference between a 5 year old chip and a new chip in the same market segment was 8-12x the performance. These days that brand new i5 will only be 20-30% faster than that 5 year old one so there's no real pressure to upgrade. Speed isn't the driving factor in upgrades any longer for many, it's replacing broken/dead equipment which has slowed the cycle down.

      Anecdotes aren't data, etc. etc. but for me - one of the guys who used to upgrade all the time, my life is now like this:

      - my home PC has a 6 year old i5 in it, the only real upgrades in the last 6 years have been more RAM, a new video card a couple of years back and replacing the platter drive with an SSD. I have no intention of replacing the board or CPU unless one of them dies.

      - I have a Nexus 7 tablet from 2013. The new tablets don't bring anything to the table at the same price point, so why upgrade?

      - Work computers is 5 years old, and again it does everything I need. Work laptop is a 5 year old Thinkpad that I stuffed an SSD into and it also performs like a champ. No need to upgrade for now.

    12. Re:Saddled with Windows 10 by orev · · Score: 2

      No, do not donate old junk (anything older than 2-3 years or so) to these places. They don't want your old junk any more than you do, and it actually costs them money to dispose if it properly, so you're actually hurting them.

    13. Re: Saddled with Windows 10 by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2

      My 2012 MacMini is in much the same boat. It's plenty powerful for my (admittedly simple) needs. It can be upgraded though. Once I upgraded to SSD's and 16GB of RAM I've never had a problem with it's performance. Apple (or Microsoft) can't sell me something if I don't need it and I don't need a new computer. The last one I bought works great.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  2. That doesn't surprise me by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We really haven't had a lot of advancement in consumer PCs for consumers to get excited about. It was easy to get consumers to want to upgrade in years past but what do they need now? They have the monitor they want, they have enough storage, and their applications all run well. We were able to previously sell them on "new is better" but now the best we can do is sell them on "replace instead of repair". We used to be selling PCs to people who want to run the latest game or the newest office suite. Now most PC time is spent on facebook, which doesn't require much more than the fanciest version of solitaire.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:That doesn't surprise me by rwa2 · · Score: 2

      Well, if everyone else is anything like me, we're all waiting for the deluge of "VR-ready" "new is better" stuff coming out this summer.

      I'm ready to plunk a couple grand on my first major PC upgrade in years (still running an Athlon II + nVidia 560Ti), but every reviewer says "wait".

      So, we've all been waiting for VR facebook solitaire, I guess. How gonzo.

    2. Re:That doesn't surprise me by TWX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep. I'm typing this on an Alienware M17x, which came out in 2009 and still does everything I need it to do beautifully as effectively a desktop computer.

      One can actually thank the advent of tablets for making the use of older computers with newer software possible, a lot of scaled-down mobile devices use variants of what had been desktop or higher-end laptop components years earlier. As software companies are forced to write for less horsepower to have good applications on the mobile devices the side-effect is supporting slower, older computers.

      They're trying to counteract that with rules as to what chipsets and processors new OSes will run on, but if they're not careful they'll end up with a fractured market like cell phones.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:That doesn't surprise me by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, if everyone else is anything like me, we're all waiting for the deluge of "VR-ready"...

      I remember my first CD-ROM drive, a Mitsumi double-speed CD-ROM drive, came with a CD of crappy demo games and applications. One of them was a VRML world. That was in 1995 or there abouts. I've been waiting for "VR-ready" since then. Or maybe since Lawnmower Man in 1992...

    4. Re:That doesn't surprise me by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

      I have a laptop from 2011. Swapped out the HDD for an SSD a year ago, and it runs everything I need beautifully.

    5. Re:That doesn't surprise me by Coisiche · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think there's also an economic factor at play. This might be due to the frequently referenced "middle class squeeze" where people simply decide to keep what they have a bit longer rather than get a replacement because their disposable income doesn't stretch quite as far as it used to.

    6. Re:That doesn't surprise me by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah baby I want to run vi and make and ssh in a bunch of VR windows. oh yeah, they'll run so much better and give my the POWAH. And Slashdot 2.0 and other forum text areas in VR, that makes me hard just thinking about it. Once we have that and my microwave oven and toaster on the IoT it'll be The Singularity bitches!

    7. Re:That doesn't surprise me by jonnyj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looking at my non-technical family and friends, 5-10 years ago many people had home PCs so they could send emails, order stuff from Amazon and read the BBC's website. A smartphone now meets all their requirements so they no longer need the PC.

      I know several people who've dumped their PC and now rely solely on their phones. They don't even bother with a tablet. Those folk are part of these statistics.

  3. Upgrading? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    So as these devices/gadgets stop getting better people don't feel the need to upgrade every 10 minutes. Or for PC's are people just upgrading the component parts (HDD to SSD, Faster graphics/network cards or more Memory)? Seems quite natural to me not sure why anyone's surprised

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    1. Re:Upgrading? by swb · · Score: 2

      I have a client who buys refurbished PCs for "non-critical" employees, so they're 2-odd years old when they get them. Many get SSDs swapped in after two years (4 total years old) for the hard disks and have had their lifetime extended nearly indefinitely.

      It wouldn't surprise me to see some of these machines outlive Windows 7 extended support if the power supply doesn't quit before that or there's some compelling reason to view the OS as obsolete. This would probably make some of them 8 or even more years since their build date.

  4. Moores law is done? by SmaryJerry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I haven't upgraded in 5 years because for building the same price computer I can only get a CPU twice as fast and a graphics card 3 times as fast as 5 years ago. It is a far cry from doubling every single year. It just isn't worth it to upgrade quickly anymore.

    1. Re:Moores law is done? by MitchDev · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When the OS starts costing more than the CPU....

  5. Only one thing left to do by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Drop the price

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  6. Unless... by MitchDev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...you are a hardcore gamer or a business needed lots of power, there is no real reason for regular or average computer users to upgrade constantly.

    Windows is an awful mess and people are tired of the constant upgrades and changing featuresets/UIs. The computer you bought 3-5 years ago, barring mechanical failure still meets or exceeds your needs for the most part, so why waste the money?

    Computers are too common, so the "WOW" factor that tells folks to buy a new one all the time just isn't there. Tablets/Smartphones are starting to hid the same skid.

    1. Re:Unless... by heypete · · Score: 2

      The computer you bought 3-5 years ago, barring mechanical failure still meets or exceeds your needs for the most part, so why waste the money?

      Indeed. I have a computer that's about 8 years old (Gigabyte-brand motherboard, Intel Core2Quad Q6600, 8GB DDR2 RAM) that I've made only some minor changes to (lots of storage, SSD boot disk, GeForce 550 Ti graphics card, etc.) that's still ticking away just fine. Turns out the Gigabyte's marketing their boards as "ultra-reliable" was accurate.

      I intend to upgrade later this year to something a bit more modern (i7, more RAM, new graphics card, bigger monitor, etc.), but the need really hasn't been pressing. Since most games are released for PC and console, developers (annoyingly) target the performance level of the consoles, so the PC has no problems running them even at high graphics settings.

      Either way, I won't be using Windows 10 -- I'll image the Windows 7 installation I currently have and move that over to the new system. Worst-case, I re-install Windows 7. When Win7 goes EOL I'll probably switch to Linux.

    2. Re:Unless... by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll image the Windows 7 installation I currently have and move that over to the new system.

      Doing this naively is going to fail. Assuming this is a full retail version, because technically you're not allowed to do what you want on a OEM or SystemBuilder version. "Techncially". So I am assuming a full retail version of 7.

      What you want is using sysprep to generalize your system before moving the disk/image:

      sysprep.exe /generalize /shutdown

      When it's done with that, image and/or move the disk. You *will* have to activate.

      Good luck

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  7. Performance Plateau by jawtheshark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's simple... We've hit a performance plateau quite a while ago. Not sure when I bought my Dell XPS 15 L502x. Something like 2010 and it was on sale for 50% of the price. Anyway, that is a Core i7 2630QM (or 2635QM, I need to check) and it came with 4GB RAM (later upgraded to 16GB). There is simply nothing I can throw at it that it can't do with cycles spare.

    Five year old machine: totally fine...

    So, PC sales are dependent on replacement sales... as most people do not need more performance.

    I'd wager to say that the late Core2Duos in the XP days, would be enough performance for most tasks, but I'm sure I'll get the 640kByte is enough quote attributed to Billy

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Performance Plateau by Dadoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We've hit a performance plateau quite a while ago.

      Man, I'm good: https://slashdot.org/comments....

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
  8. In other news. . . by Idou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Smartphone sales growth continues to be explosive."

    Maybe we should just add smartphones to the definition of "PCs" (a device you can carry in your pocket does seem to be a "personal" device, anyway) and go on with life?

    Innovation didn't stagnate, it just is being focused on a new form factor.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  9. Spent $700 On Phone by zenlessyank · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can't afford PC, laptop, or tablet.

  10. Not just laptops by mi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some official statistics may look decent, but the labor-force participation (a figure not prone to fudging like politically redefined unemployment) is the lowest it has been since 1978.

    With over 94 million not even looking for work — and thus not included in the unemployment statistics — we can afford less and less non-necessities.

    With the constantly rising food-prices and the incomes of those still working stalling, expect further declines.

    Socialism — measured as the part of the GDP spent by government — sucks.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Not just laptops by careysub · · Score: 2

      A completely off-topic rant. However a few things that Mi fails to consider:

      if you follow the FactCheck link given you will see that the labor force participation rate today is higher than at any time from the end of World War II to 1978 (or for that matter higher than any time before World War II), a period of prosperity that conservatives generally imagine was a Valhalla of probity and Great America. Its rise after 1978 was due to women entering the workforce in large numbers (often opposed by conservatives), a one-time only event since this cultural change cannot happen twice.

      The decline in labor for participation is guaranteed to continue as Baby Boomers retire, and was predictable decades in advance, and it is not a sign of a declining America, of people getting lazy, or some other moral failing of America. It is the natural, unavoidable result of an aging population.

      Ah yes, the terrible, terrible socialism of government spending. How much better we were in the 1800s! If you look at the global stats on this, the U.S. is lower than nearly all major industrialized nations (only three are lower in this respect), and we could shave about 3% off of this figure though if we spent what the rest of world does on defense.

      But Mi is on to something about stalled salaries for workers, which have been flat for 44 years. If corporations returned more of the revenue to the workers who actually made that revenue possible, then yes, not just computers, but the entire consumer economy would revitilized, as would economic growth overall.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:Not just laptops by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      OMG! 1/3 of the country has no job? My 3 year old is a dead beat! Granny should quick slacking off! Its a crisis!

      Seriously, they is a very misleading number. Unless you factor out the young and old it is meaningless. We have a lot of Baby Boomers retiring now, and old folks are living longer. Not factoring this out is disingenuous.

      Prime age participation (ages 25-54) is at 81.2%, only slightly lower than the all time high of 84.6% right before the dotcom bubble popped.

      Source: https://research.stlouisfed.or...

  11. Not a difficult problem to solve by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The industry just needs to get off its laurels and stop pushing cloud. Since everything is going web application, there is little reason to have a beefy desktop system. The software vendors are pushing leased software that's cloud based, meaning the money hardware vendors would have made is now being spent monthly/annually by the software/cloud vendors.

    If the hardware industry decided to standardize and actually push a free OS like Linux and tout the advantages to owning your own data, they would be back in business. Its wishful thinking and the hardware industry as a whole has never been very good about acting in their own best interest, preferring to suck the dick of their sugar daddy Microsoft but we could hope.

  12. evolution of the Apple logo by epine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Last summer I refurbished a small manufacturer in the agricultural space (mainly for my own sanity). We tried to buy new and failed.

    It was a Windows shop with many legacy XP systems scattered about on the production floor (some used maybe once per month depending on product mix out the door). Not a single long-term employee expressed any love for Windows, so we had buy-in to replace everything on the white collar side with Mac Minis, after one of the employees brought in his own quad-core mini with 16 GB RAM to show off.

    Then we went to the Apple store and discovered that in the soldered RAM era, the price point we had approved covered a dual core system with 8 GB of RAM soldered in. By the time we scaled it up to be comparable to the Mini from two years earlier, it became 50% more expensive. Because of the Windows legacy, we expected fairly heavy use of virtualization, making 8 GB a very low ceiling into the near future.

    And then the answer came back at the new value point: well, fuck it, we're already getting an armload of HP refurbs for the manufacturing floor, let's just get more refurbished Windows 7 boxes for the office staff, too.

    More teeth, smaller apple. Funny how you can now see Apple shrinking all the way from the stock exchange.

  13. This will reverse next year by LetterRip · · Score: 3, Funny

    VR is going to take off at a ridiculous pace, and people will need a powerful PC (or XBox One or PS3...) to use it. So I suspect this trend will reverse either next year, or the year following.

    1. Re:This will reverse next year by jawtheshark · · Score: 2

      VR is going to take off at a ridiculous pace,

      Do you really think that? The only people really seeming to care about it are hardcore gamers. Normal people, outside of IT not so much. Now of course, VR may turn out to be so awesome everyone wants it and need it for work and home...

      Allow me to be very sceptical about that...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:This will reverse next year by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where are my Funny mod points when I need them?

      --
      That is all.
  14. What did everyone expect? by Chas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, today's PCs are GROTESQUELY overpowered for anything but certain types of games.

    I'm running a six year old hex-core CPU (i7 970) with a 2 year old video card (GTX 970) and an SSD boot disk.

    I'm not doing 4K gaming. It's primarily a workstation (see WORK) and I do a bit of light gaming on the side.

    There's literally no reason I couldn't go another 5 years on this machine.

    I also have an older laptop (Thinkpad T61p). It's still fine for web browsing and light gaming as well. RAM is maxed out and it's running off an SSD boot disk too.

    It does what I need it to, so I have zero reason to replace it.

    Can anyone seriously fault me for not spending another couple grand to refresh these machines?

    Honestly, the PC market was in the Moore's Law bubble so long, that it's LONG overdue for this sort of correction.

    We'll probably see decreasing sales over the next 5-10 years as people are keeping their workhorse machines longer.

    Current equipment will need the time to age out. And, once it does, we should see the sales cycles stepping up again, though never again to the levels they were.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:What did everyone expect? by SmaryJerry · · Score: 2

      For someone like myself these GPUs are not nearly powerful enough. What I want is a 144 HZ 4K screen, add to it a bonus that it plays games at 144hz, and another bonus that it plays those games at max settings. Right now even the most powerful GPU could maybe use a 144hz 4k screen, if you could even find one to purchase. No GPU that exists can play newer 3D games at max settings at 144 hz in 1080p. Sure, it is asking a lot but there is a long way to go, maybe the newest NVIDIA cards can give a flawless 4K, desktop experience but it is going to 8-10 years before we get a flawless gaming experience even on today's games. Ofcourse by then there could be other optimizations and engine improvements but games may also take that much more power. No one but me probably cares about that, so VR taking off is my only hope they continue to improve their speed and power.

  15. Re:Thank you, USA, for this weak global economy by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Inflation? Inflation is too low. They should be printing money right now.

  16. All my fault by BenJeremy · · Score: 2

    I have 6 desktops, 2 laptops, a MacBook, 2 iPads, 7 or so Android tablets, a Windows tablet.... I guess I should buy some more?

    I think sales of things like Tablets will rage when a product genre is new, or finally reaches a tolerable price point, but how many tablets or laptops does a family need? Disclaimer: I'm a developer, and use all the equipment I have, so not typical... and your average family has probably already bought a tablet or laptop that works well enough to read e-mails, browse the webs, or watch cat videos.

    Sales are bound to drop off. Most people don't need the latest and greatest technology, and even those who used to, are finding it less urgent to upgrade. What's mostly left is new purchases to replace broken/dead tech items.

  17. apt-get install wine by tepples · · Score: 2

    When the OS starts costing more than the CPU....

    Then it's time to consider whether Debian with apt-get install wine can run your applications or close enough substitutes.

  18. Re: Let's NOT BLAME MSFT by itsdapead · · Score: 2

    You are blaming Windows 10 for PC sales not declining as much as Mac sales?

    The figures combine PC & tablet sales. I suspect a lot of Apple's falls are due to traditional tablet sales tanking - the PC makers didn't really have appreciable tablet sales to lose. As for Mac/PC sales, Apple & Lenovo started the year ahead because they're mainly in laptops, small-form-factor and all-in-ones, which have been doing better than desktops for the last few years.

    Intel probably get a slice of the blame, too, with delays in releasing new chips. The mobile Skylake chips with the higher-spec graphics - which is what Apple needs for any new MacBook Pro - have been slow to appear.

    But no, Windows 8/10 and all that isn't the cause - its a symptom - a botched attempt by Microsoft to push into the mobile market and fix that which was not broken. The cause is the maturity of PC technology and the end of the 2-3 year upgrade cycle.

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  19. SMAC from GOG is silver by tepples · · Score: 2

    I will never again use Windows - simply waiting on the system to die on me and moving to Linux [if there is an option to run my beloved very old windows games like Alpha Centauri that I am done] .

    Alpha Centauri is rated silver in AppDB. Load Xubuntu on a USB stick, sudo apt-get install wine, and see what you can run.

  20. Root Cause: Offshoring and Prioritizing Essentials by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this is a symptom of the ongoing economic issues in the world. People talk about the vicious circle that is expected as American companies offshore good paying jobs overseas for cheaper labour. Newsflash: It's here. Companies make more money at first, but who will be able to afford to buy their products in America? Home computers as much as we like to think them essential, aren't. People can get by without them. They can buy goods at stores, get books from the library (but don't we also complain that people aren't reading as much anymore anyway?), and do many things offline. Some people (me included) think that getting offline more is a good thing. If you are ditching your TV for Netflix, you don't need a powerful computer. Only something enough to run a browser (but heck, most TVs have streaming service clients built into them anyway). Other than games, computers from almost ten years ago are good enough to run a word processor. So who is going to buy a new computer or tablet (for hundreds of dollars) when their job has left for Bangladesh or China and McDonald's is putting in automated kiosks? This is no surprise.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  21. Re: Mobile apps deliberately exclude PC-only users by tepples · · Score: 2

    You can buy a 'burner' Android phone for $10

    Which make and model? I searched Google for 10 dollar android phone and found several results talking about the same $9.82 LG L16 and L15G on TracFone that Walmart sold in November of last year. Among these results was an article warning me that the offer resembled a clearance and thus unlikely to remain available. The starter Android phone recommended in the article was a Posh Orion Mini, which Amazon shows for $50.

    never activate or buy time for it

    I fear that trying to run one of these apps without cellular service won't get past the app's "please enter the validation code texted to you to confirm that you're a real person" screen.

  22. maybe everybody has what they need now? by swschrad · · Score: 2

    we have been led down a path... "we doubled the speed of the Smokin'Board processor, so you need it. notice how slow things are?" and that is because the bloatware providers saw that chip coming, and packed in more delays and non-features to cut your computing speed effectively in half.

    everybody knows it. and they're saying "enough. This is fine. Stop."

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  23. Hardware plateau? by voss · · Score: 2

    Any computer made in the last 7 years with 2 gb of memory can run windows 10 at a reasonable speed, basically any computer that can run windows 7 well can run windows 10 well. Even gamers are realizing all they really need to replace for most games is the video card. So computers are getting replaced now when they old computer just dies.

    What will start computer sales again? Probably when Oculus-like VR drops from $600 to say $200, maybe some breakthrough in 3d projection. Home robots? Who knows, something that demands more computing power.

  24. Re:Nonsense, there is just no reason to upgrade by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    Companies very much care about the operating system. This is really Microsoft's bread and butter. It always has been. Even home use flowed from the fact that Microsoft dominated business. Even if the OS isn't spying on you, it can break and there's also the usual "let other people test it" burn in period.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  25. Re:I want to pay for more tax breaks for the wealt by jedidiah · · Score: 2

    No. The rest of the 99% are still blowing money like there's no tomorrow. They're just not blowing it on PCs any more. The PC market is mature and saturated. It's no longer got any "razzle dazzle".

    H*LL, even the tablet market is starting to lose it's luster already...

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  26. Re:SSD: Market killer by eneville · · Score: 2

    Really? Sure it reduces the slowest bottleneck of the PC, the spinny disk, but it does not improve other bits of performance. I can make my PC perform quite well by putting much of /usr/local into /dev/shm during boot. Faster storage is great, but the real factor is where are people using technology now. The only answer for that is much of the facebook crowd use a PC for just facebook and now they're able to do this on their phones there is no need to upgrade the PC when they don't use it.