Slashdot Mirror


Iraq Shuts Down Internet In Entire Country To Prevent Exam Cheating (softpedia.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Iraqi government has ordered ISPs to shut down Internet access in the entire country to prevent exam cheating for Iraq's official exams for secondary and high schools. This is the second year in a row when Iraq does this, after the same thing happened in 2015. Companies like Akamai and Dyn also noted the government's poor decision on Twitter. It appears that Iraqi officials never heard of signal jammers and video cameras to combat exam cheating. The country's Internet went dark May 14-16th, between 05:00 AM and 08:00 AM GMT. An Iraqi ISP leaked on Facebook the content of an email it received from state officials.

51 of 92 comments (clear)

  1. easiest solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "It appears that Iraqi officials never heard of signal jammers and video cameras to combat exam cheating."
    Seems easier to just turn off the internet than to send signal jammers to every school and ensure they are being used, and cover the correct frequencies.

  2. Re: Iraqis never heard of signal jammers/cameras by robotvoice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure they've heard of those technologies. I'm sure they use them.

    I'm also pretty certain they don't have the resources to equip every school with signal jammers and cameras - and staff to operate them. This is the cheap option.

    How cheap it is compared to the business and productivity lost is unknown : )

    Reminiscent of the arguments for putting pollution filtering on fossil fuel burning power plants vs. capturing pollution from every individual personal motor vehicle.

  3. Pen and paper by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be simpler just to make the examination hall a technology free zone?

    1. Re:Pen and paper by omgwtfroflbbqwasd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spoken like someone who's parents aren't powerful enough to coerce/bribe the local principal and teachers.

    2. Re:Pen and paper by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps just turn off all the power to the country. How insane!

      Really... why are they allowing students to use any electronics during the exams? Problem solved.

    3. Re:Pen and paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spoken like someone whose parents definitely bribed the local principal and teachers :S

  4. Re: Iraqis never heard of signal jammers/cameras by quenda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How cheap it is compared to the business and productivity lost is unknown : )

    Lost? I'm sure a lot of businesses had increased productivity that morning.

  5. Re: Iraqis never heard of signal jammers/cameras by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Reminiscent of the arguments for putting pollution filtering on fossil fuel burning power plants vs. capturing pollution from every individual personal motor vehicle.

    Not really. The cost of pollution controls on cars can be easily passed on to consumers because it is a tangible part on the automobile. On a power plant it will have to be factored into existing operational costs and how to divvy these up to the consumers (by usage, flat rate, additional incidental charge,etc).

    You can't charge students taking a test for the camera pointing at them.

  6. Re: This is the future Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They should use the Seattle solution. Make the Internet access so slow you can't get enough answers to greatly change your score.

  7. hmmm by jason777 · · Score: 1

    Thats not too extreme or anything

  8. Re:Jammers and video cameras? by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Signal Jammers are all the way illegal in the US.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  9. Preventing the poor from cheating by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Therefore, only those who could afford a mobile device with a cache of wikipedia could cheat...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Preventing the poor from cheating by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 1

      Therefore, only those who could afford a mobile device with a cache of wikipedia could cheat...

      This may help on some tests, but limits the effectiveness of nationwide tweets where "the answer to question n is three," etc...

      --
      Real lawyers write in C++
  10. Re:Misleading title by basecastula+ · · Score: 1

    I wonder how true this is.

  11. How successful was this shutdown? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    Is it really that easy to block access entirely? Are there any stories of people that found a way around the damage?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:How successful was this shutdown? by ark1 · · Score: 1

      You could simply setup a wireless LAN and have students share info this way.

  12. cram for the test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why not open book?

  13. Re:Misleading title by quenda · · Score: 1

    It is in effect from 0500 to 0800,

    That is GMT, which was 8-11am local time according to TFA, so the rest of your post is BS.

  14. arrogance by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ah, the smell of western arrogance in the morning. Of course if some brown people decide something, it must be stupid.

    Or it could simply be that they decided to not engage in an arms race with students, to take no chances (seems these exams are really important to them) and to make sure.

    And it's not like the USA wouldn't be known for the same kind of knee-jerk reaction. Like when all air travel was shut down for a week following 9/11. Because... uh, because of what? Anyone seriously thought there were more terrorists lined up for the next day?

    Not that I support this shutdown, there's got to be a better way, but to simply assume they're stupid monkey who have not heard of this or that other, incomplete solution is just pure arrogance.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:arrogance by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who the fuck said anything about "brown people?"

      If the same thing happened in say, Alabama, we'd comment on it too. .

      Stupid is as stupid does, no matter the skin color or location. The sheer ridiculousness of taking net access away from an entire country "for the children" is what's being mocked here, not the technological abilities in Iraq.

      As to your air travel strawman, The US was trying to determine what had happened. We had no way of knowing that there were NOT more terrorists lined up, and the severity of 9/11 was a bit higher than some kids cheating on an exam. In retrospect, that reaction might not have been warranted, but seeing as how nothing like that had ever happened before, there are worse ways we could have reacted.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:arrogance by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, you could have invaded a country that wasn't even involved, I mean, THAT would have been an overreaction.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    3. Re:arrogance by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The US solution is the best. Everyone passes. Everyone is a winner.

      I used to be amazed while I worked at a University with first year students. I was literally the first person in their academic life where failure actually meant halt and go no further until you pass. Watching what happens at primary school (not in the US) these days makes me cry. A report card with F F F F F and the student happily progresses to the next grade. Shit when I went through school they actively made people repeat grades. Where I live at the moment they kick you out of the school and make you go to one for dumber students so they don't hold the rest of the class back.

    4. Re:arrogance by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Worse than you think. Texas now allows a "kid" up to 26 to stay in high school. Friend is a teacher, unbelievable stuff happening. He has told me stories like, principle to teacher: Johnny's grade is too low, he needs to pass, teacher back to principle: What grade would you like me to give johnny?, C. Johnny was flunking big time, but graduation rates are too low, so we need to pass more. And those exams are a joke, I thought you had to pass to graduate, nope not the case. As my friend says, the kids run the school and THEY KNOW IT.

    5. Re:arrogance by bfpierce · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you on about regarding Brown people? Can you kindly point out where that's being said?

      This seems more like 'Eastern' make shit up to make people feel guilty syndrome to me.

    6. Re:arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      please, that invasion might have been painted as an overreaction but it was calculated and intended... by morons, maybe, but calculated nonetheless

    7. Re:arrogance by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He has told me stories like, principle to teacher: Johnny's grade is too low, he needs to pass, teacher back to principle

      Principal. Interesting to see people who are unable to spell complaining about the low standards in schools....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    8. Re:arrogance by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      Good catch, did not use the preview button to check. Bad me.

    9. Re:arrogance by Tom · · Score: 1

      True, stupidity at the highest level.

      When I went to school, you would repeat a grade if you failed, but not in the first 4 years, when you were still a small kid and wouldn't understand it. You could also change school if you fail, or are in danger of failing.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    10. Re:arrogance by Tom · · Score: 1

      They are religious nutjobs, grant you that. But if they're so stupid, why exactly are you guys so afraid of them enriching Uranium? At least get your lies lined up, ok?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    11. Re:arrogance by Tom · · Score: 1

      The sheer ridiculousness of taking net access away from an entire country "for the children" is what's being mocked here, not the technological abilities in Iraq.

      So the Internet will be down for one pre-announced day. That's a big inconvenience, granted. But why is it so ridiculous if this is the national exam day where, apparently, basically everyone takes their exam? And why does it have to be ridiculous, stupid and all those terms? Someone made a decision and decided that this is bigger than that. We may disagree (I do as well), but why humiliate and insult?

      The US was trying to determine what had happened.

      It wasn't clear? That is what you're saying? It wasn't absolutely crystal clear what had happened? Please, except for the question of who was pulling the strings, which is still unanswered to this day, pretty much everything was absolutely clear by the time all four planes were down.

      We had no way of knowing that there were NOT more terrorists lined up

      And no reasonable assumption to believe that a shutdown of air travel would do anything whatsoever. Grounding all flights that day - absolutely right. I would've also immediately landed all planes in the air, on the assumption that more terrorists are already in the air and will initiate their operation any moment.
      Grounding all air traffic for a week is a typical politician reaction - whoever decided to open air travel again, if the next day something happens, his career is over. So let's not take the risk. Let's make a thousand additional people die instead because they take the car instead (there've been studies on that).

      but seeing as how nothing like that had ever happened before

      Happened not, but a similar, even larger, plot was thwarted by US intelligence many years before, so the scenario was known.

      But this is not the discussion about 9/11. The point is:

      In retrospect, that reaction might not have been warranted

      But someone at the time decided that it's the best thing to do, for whatever reason. The same is now true in Iraq.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    12. Re:arrogance by Tom · · Score: 1

      a) because that is what's written between the lines in TFA.
      b) nobody said it's a good thing. But isn't it funny how we can't evaluate a decision rationally and need to go to insults and humiliation instead of discussion pro and con?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    13. Re:arrogance by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      What country would that be? 9/11 caused the invasion of Afghanistan, which was involved.

      Saddam Hussein's posturing about having WMD to attack Iran with, and refusal to allow UN weapons inspectors in, along with strong indications that he had the weapons led to the invasion of Iraq.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    14. Re:arrogance by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Such as the lie you just told about anyone worrying about Iraq enriching uranium rather than Iran enriching uranium?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    15. Re:arrogance by Tom · · Score: 1

      Ay, my bad. I got that mixed up. Iraq was with invisible WMDs, right.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    16. Re:arrogance by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      http://www.thepoliticalinsider...

      They look quite visible in the photos I have seen, did you miss that? But, in reality, it wasn't really about the WMD, it was about Saddam denying entry to the UN required weapons inspectors, and threatening Iran with a gas attack if they attacked Iraq.

      It was all posturing, but posturing that risks your country being invaded to prevent the usage of weapons that you know you don't have seems like an invitation to disaster. Would you have rathered the US sit back and let Saddam gas Iran like he gassed the Kurds in 88?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:arrogance by Tom · · Score: 1

      You mean the chemical weapons that the USA had sold him many years ago to gas the Kurds? Yes, everyone knows about those. But Bush claimed that he had many more and the ability to build as many as he wants. You forgot the nice invention of chem factories built into trucks that Cheney presented to the media as fact?

      Saddam denying entry to the UN required weapons inspectors

      Wrong. There was some back and forth over those, but eventually they were allowed in and completed their report.

      let Saddam gas Iran like he gassed the Kurds in 88?

      With the support of the USA? He had already used chemical weapons in the Iran-Iraq war, also with support of the USA whose primary interest was (still is) to prevent or slow Irans ascent to a regional power that counters Saudia Arabia.

      So please, it's not about saving some brown people, especially not when they are unlucky enough to live in an enemy country. You don't buy that bullshit that the propaganda machine throws out, do you?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  15. Production gained by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 1

    But on the other side, consider the productivity cost of having the wrong test scores assigned to kids. While test scores are far from perfect, that kind of wholesale inaccuracy can impact productivity for a generation.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
  16. And that with their TLD by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 2

    Are the Iraqi's seriously shutting down .iq to improve school exams?

  17. sounds like it's test for Iraqi officials by dimko · · Score: 1

    Basically they touch the ground to see what would be consequences of cutting off Internetz for whole population for extended periods of time. Perhaps for ever.

  18. Re:Complete Transcript Of Test Answers Here! by aevan · · Score: 1

    There was an entire cell of terrorists that did.

  19. Re:Jammers and video cameras? by MFriis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In a country where disabling the internet in it's entirety is the only tool to prevent exam cheating, i am sure they can use jammers without legal consequenses.

  20. What the heck is the point? by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


    What did cheaters do before the internet?

    It's far more effective to get kids to arrive in uniform; leave their school bags and phones/tablets/smartwatches outside and have good spacing between tables and a person present in the classroom to monitor activities.

    Do the old school teacher trick and leave the room for a bit. Often you'll see desperate cheaters frantically checking to see if you've gone far and what the brightest students notes are. Cheating children are easily caught.

    If you have a budget for it a security camera can help. You can always view the tape later for suspicious activities of under performing kids achieving suspiciously high marks. Hopefully it's through merit, hard work and dedication.

    If they bothered to make every major region have a different exam data set and every kid gets a multi-page exam in a different order then mass scale cheating would become rather complicated.

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:What the heck is the point? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I saw a series of pictures posted the other day with some of the things confiscated from exams.
      Like calculators that have been hollowed out and the keypad is removable to expose the phone inside.
      Devious little buggers. Holds a lot more info than a long sleeve can cover.

  21. Re:Jammers and video cameras? by Wootery · · Score: 2

    It's also a LOT more expensive to deploy than just shutting down the internet - which has zero capital cost.

    Who cares about just the capital cost? You seem to be assuming that Iraq has zero Internet-based economy.

  22. I guess the internet isn't economically vital by sabbede · · Score: 1
    in Iraq. Yet. Can you imagine how many billions of dollars would be lost by a Western nation trying this? Many is my answer.

    Given the precarious conditions, I can only assume that they figure turning off the internet won't have that great an economic impact.

  23. Re: Iraqis never heard of signal jammers/cameras by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    How cheap it is compared to the business and productivity lost is unknown : )

    Multiply the number of Iraqi's who read slash dot by their hourly rate and the number of hours the internet was down. That's how much money was saved :D

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  24. Cost allocation by sjbe · · Score: 1

    You can't charge students taking a test for the camera pointing at them.

    Sure they can. I've taken tests at testing centers where they did exactly that. What do you think those test fees are for? They just divide up the cost of operating the camera among the number of people taking the test. It's trivial to do that. I'm an accountant and in cost accounting we do stuff like this all the time. It's called cost allocation. Some costs are easy to attribute to a specific activity. Others aren't so easy but ultimately you have to allocate all the costs somehow and there is usually a rational way to do it. Allocating the cost of operating a camera is relatively easy.

  25. Entire country? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    But the Ieaqi government doesn't control the entire country.
    What about ISIS, or the Kurds,

  26. Re:Jammers and video cameras? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who cares about just the capital cost? You seem to be assuming that Iraq has zero Internet-based economy.

    Given it's a Big Test, it probably follows like other Big Tests you see, like the ones in Asia (where cheating Is basically an art).

    Effectively, it's the One Big Test That Determines Your Future (And If You Still Have Parents). The results of the test determine if you're going to Overseas University with Scholarship, Local University, Trade School, not going at all. Parents have disowned kids who don't make it to overseas university, and if your parents are rich enough and don't really care about the test results, they can pay your way through overseas university as well.

    The pressure is so immense that there is a distinct increase in teenaged suicides, and well, the incentive to cheat is quite up there. So creative types invent all sorts of cheat equipment - from hidden radios and ear pieces through to hidden storage devices with displays.

    And if you think shutting down the internet for a few hours is bad, a few places have requested that people stop what they're doing for those hours - even banning traffic to give the students quiet to do the exams.

  27. Better Proctoring by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    The real solution is better proctoring, do they have a proctor shortage in Iraq?

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  28. And... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Allah is PISSED!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.