Slashdot Mirror


FAA Warns of GPS Outages This Month During Mysterious Tests On the West Coast (gizmodo.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader schwit1 shares a Gizmodo report: Starting today, it appears the U.S. military will be testing a device or devices that will potentially jam GPS signals for six hours each day. We say "appears" because officially the tests were announced by the FAA but are centered near the U.S. Navy's largest installation, China Lake, Californi -- home to the Navy's 1.1 million acre Naval Air Weapons Center in the Mojave Desert. And the Navy won't tell us much about what's going on. The FAA issued an advisory warning pilots on Saturday that global positioning systems (GPS) could be unreliable during six different days this month, primarily in the Southwestern United States. On June 7, 9, 21, 23, 28, and 30th the GPS interference testing(PDF) will be taking place between 9:30am and 3:30pm Pacific time. But if you're on the ground, you probably won't notice interference.

170 comments

  1. Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good thing they're trying so hard to eliminate VOR, LORAN, NDB, etc, because GPS is 100% reliable!

    1. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China Lake, Californi

      LOL

    2. Re:Redundant Systems by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Good thing they're trying so hard to eliminate VOR, LORAN, NDB, etc,

      [Loran - shudder] When doing things the hard way half measures are no way to go. Don't worry, grandpa, your astrolabe will function perfectly.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    3. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, the Loran I had in my airplane just worked. Plug in lat/long and it would steer a straight enough line there. GPS, on the other hand, needs a $500/yr jeppersen subscription, courtesy of a Garmin's vendor lock-in.

    4. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When a war between first world powers happens and the GPS satellites are destroyed on the first day, my sextant will continue to function. Good luck with your now useless GPS unit though.

      Anyway, even in the 1960's experimental LORAN modes had accuracies under 6 meters, which is comparable to modern GPS. Money was not put in to develop this to wide deployment, but there was no major technical limitation. Some LORAN-C stations were still online as recently as 2 or 3 years ago, to serve as redundancy since GPS is easy to jam or destroy outright.

    5. Re:Redundant Systems by kimvette · · Score: 2

      Eliminating VOR and LORAN was dumb... because the first major solar storm we see on the scale of the Solar Storm of 1859 will wipe out most if not all of the GPS constellation. GPS should have been designed to integrate LORAN and VOR from the beginning.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    6. Re:Redundant Systems by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      GPS, on the other hand, needs a $500/yr jeppersen subscription, courtesy of a Garmin's vendor lock-in.

      Why can't you just use your cellphone? Isn't there an app for that?

    7. Re:Redundant Systems by SCPaPaJoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Time to dust off the sextant. My father insisted that I learn celestial navigation when I started sailing long distances when I was a teen, but that was back in the early '90's. I also read recently that the US Navy is bringing sextant training as well. Now if I could only find some new charts...

    8. Re:Redundant Systems by blindseer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree. The US GPS, Navstar, is quite durable but it still requires a very extensive system to keep functional. It's also quite likely very expensive too but given it's capability the cost to benefit likely still falls in Navstar's favor over any ground based system.

      The problem with a satellite navigation system is that if anything goes wrong that can affect many satellites, like the solar storm you mention, the means to repair or replace it is limited. We cannot simply fly up to a satellite and fix it. The only thing we can do is launch a replacement. If the satellite is truly dead then we'd lack the ability to re-orbit or de-orbit it and get it out of the way of the replacement satellite. It will be a hazard to subsequent satellites for 10,000 years. Launching satellites is limited to the number of spares on the ground and/or the rate in which they can be manufactured, as well as the rate in which they can be launched.

      There are a number of ground based systems that augment or assist satellite navigation, WAAS is one that comes to mind, but they rely on satellite signals to operate. I assume it would be relatively trivial to allow these systems to operate autonomously but I've seen no effort to do so.

      LORAN, VOR, and other ground based navigation aids are quite valuable in that being land based they can be repaired and replaced with much greater ease than anything in orbit. If there is an extended outage of satellite navigation then I'd expect ground based systems to get put into use relatively quickly but when talking about replacing an entire constellation of satellite navigation aids "relatively quickly" can still mean months, or even years. In the mean time we'd likely see many flights cancelled or put on longer routes because of reduced navigation capability. This would no doubt come at great expense and inconvenience. Had the US designed Navstar to integrate with ground based systems from the start then we'd never see this threat since the value of ground based navigation would be much more obvious and we'd not see systems like LORAN lose interest, and then funding, and then get destroyed.

      Given the way that governments operate we'll see funding for ground based navigation fade to nothing until something happens to the satellites. At which point large sums of money will be allocated quickly with all the waste and corruption inherent with that panic. At which point, if we are lucky enough to have some smart people get paired up with some politically connected people, we just might get a very durable navigation system that integrates ground and satellite navigation seamlessly.

      I doubt we'll be so lucky.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    9. Re: Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends. I mean, I agree with you but the 'problem' with, say, VORs is that they can be independently controlled.. They use tech that an educated hardware person can understand and fix.

      So they don't funnel billions to defense contractors and in a revolution type situation they can be controlled by local people. Oh, and other countries can have their own without our blessing. These are not good qualities from certain points of view.

    10. Re:Redundant Systems by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Time to dust off the sextant. My father insisted that I learn celestial navigation when I started sailing long distances when I was a teen, but that was back in the early '90's.

      Let me guess... you actually mean early 1490s, and your dad was Christopher Columbus.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    11. Re: Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt Siri will be functional at 15-20,000 feet, over uninhabited terrain. I can barely get service in some places between Needles and Barstow on the ground with Verizon.

    12. Re:Redundant Systems by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My brother is in a commercial fleet, and he was required to learn how to do navigation by manual methods (charts, compass, sightings, etc) to pass whatever certification exams he was taking at the time (and there's a *lot* of them). I'd have to imagine Navy navigators have to pass the same sort of standards as civilians sailors. It definitely seems like a good thing not to rely too heavily on technology, not just in case it fails, but as a way to sanity-check the computer systems that nearly all modern vessels rely on.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    13. Re:Redundant Systems by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Well, those are more difficult for the US to jam so of course they want to eliminate them.

    14. Re: Redundant Systems by evilviper · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of offline navigation apps that don't need any data connection, just the GPS signal.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re: Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GPS signal not being RELIABLE is the reason for this discussion. Silly!

    16. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally the military assumes that important operations are underway when things are broken.

    17. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS is low power, but very spread. It's in fact very difficult to jam, unless you are quite close to the jammer and/or are receiving the signal using a few CM patch antenna (like your phone or car GPS receiver).

      And the military certainly isn't worried as they have automatic null-steering antennas that can ignore point source jamming, and as there are general 8-15 visible satellites at any time, unless the jamming source(s) is big enough to cover the majority of the sky, there won't be an issue.

    18. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/02/17/why-naval-academy-students-are-learning-to-sail-by-the-stars-for-the-first-time-in-a-decade/

      "The Navy at large also stopped training its fleet on celestial navigation in 2006 but restored lessons for navigator and assistant navigator officers in 2011, said Meadows, the naval public affairs officer."

    19. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Disclaimer, work for a NAVSEA group)

      I doubt land based signals will go away. The USMC has been incredibly worried for years about the fragility and deliberate jamming of GPS [military term is "GPS degraded / denied environment" ] and it's something that the Navy is keenly aware of. Celestial navigation can be incredibly accurate with modern information and electro-optical systems, but is still dependent on weather (Night + clear view of sky). Things like laser ring gyro's can help but they are relative to last known position--any excessive shock, electrical anomaly, etc. that occurs and they need to be recalibrated to something. This is an active area of research.

      The only solution I personally have had is to have a LIGO map of the earth's surface gravity differences and a plot of the moon and sun's position relative to the earth's tilt and spin at a given time in order to use geographic gravitational anomalies to calculate position. The main issue is accuracy in a small enough package as the gravitational differences ("fingerprint") is very small. Geologists have been using gravitational anomalies to find ore deposits for years, and anyone would have a hell of a time jamming gravity. :)

    20. Re: Redundant Systems by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Try any of those in an airplane at cruising altitude. Nope, no more GPS position.

      I don't know why, but they just don't work. Probably a licensing thing, they probably have to pay someone to be allowed to use the GPS system, and pay them a helluva lot more to use it in the air.

    21. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? They haven't eliminated VOR. It's still out there, it's still functioning, it's still required to use in training and on your checkrides. There is no plan to get rid of it.
      The FAA has a program to shut down some VOR transmitters by 2020, unfortunately they titled the program "Discontinuation of VOR", but that's because (from the program goals) "about half the VORs could be discontinued and provide a level of the service with no point further than 77nm from a VOR, no airport with a VOR/ILS approach more than 100nm from any point. VORs in western mountainous area, Alaska, Hawaii, other islands/territories retained."

      LORAN is gone, though.

    22. Re: Redundant Systems by evilviper · · Score: 1

      There are innumerable reports that say you're wrong:

      http://travel.stackexchange.co...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    23. Re: Redundant Systems by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      It didn't work last time I tried it, but I'll try again tomorrow then.

    24. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are apps like Foreflight but your phone isn't certified for navigation. Certain avionics containing GPS (several Garmin units among them) are certified and legal to use for flight. This also makes them expensive because the certification process is costly.

    25. Re: Redundant Systems by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the aluminum tube you're inside makes reception more difficult, but the big windows in the cockpit would help greatly. A passenger could try against the side port windows, if appropriately seated.

      In my brief searching, I found several people saying iPhones disable the GPS in airplane mode. Some Android systems will as well, but the later just requires going into settings and re-enabling GPS. You should be able to test that on the ground, first.

      HERE Offline Maps has a nice "Drive" mode in the menu, which shows current MPH, and heading; doesn't require selecting a route. And if you've downloaded maps for the state you're flying over, you can identify the locales, roads and some hints of terrain (water, hills, etc.) below you.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    26. Re: Redundant Systems by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      OK, thanks, I'll see if it works. Would be nice to be able to identify landmarks instead of just having aeronautical waypoints and airports. Also helps when passengers ask where we are ;-)

    27. Re: Redundant Systems by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      FYI, non aviation GPS are disabled over a set altitude to prevent use as a cheap missile guidance solution. I believe the altitude is 10kft, but I could be wrong.

      I used to repair GPS equipment when I was in college as a side job, it was a pretty well known thing back then, but they may have undone it since then, along with selective availability. Last time I tried to use my phone in an airplane, the GPS gave no fix despite enough satellites in view and reporting.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Looking it up, it is 59kft, so unlikely to cause you problems on your aircraft as you were speaking of 20kft.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    28. Re:Redundant Systems by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Look, there was a reason for becoming a lich, and it was to avoid punk kids like you.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    29. Re: Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked up how stupid you are in your post history instead Coren the clown, KING of FAIL hahahaha https://slashdot.org/comments.... , http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , https://slashdot.org/comments....

    30. Re:Redundant Systems by ElrondHalfelven · · Score: 1

      Yes https://play.google.com/store/... That's what I use in my airplane (although usually on a tablet).

    31. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren the clown, KING of FAIL: Apk showed everyone how much of a lying little butthurt punk you are https://slashdot.org/comments.... , http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , https://slashdot.org/comments....

    32. Re:Redundant Systems by crispin_bollocks · · Score: 1

      Knew a lobsterman who used loran - he said he'd cut his throttle coming up on a waypoint, and stick his gaff out the port side and grab his trawl in the dark. Pretty damn accurate, without a GUI.

    33. Re: Redundant Systems by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Nope, just tried it again today. At 36000 feet over the mediterranean, airplane mode off, my iPhone 5 thought I was still in the hotel and my iPad Air 2 thought I was somewhere south of West Africa (0N, 0E).

      To check whether this was due to the signal being too weak in the cockpit, I briefly considered opening a window but then came up with a better idea: I checked again after landing, all doors and windows still closed, and reception was perfect. Airplane mode did have to be off.

    34. Re: Redundant Systems by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I tried it today at 36000 feet, and niether my iPhone 5 nor my iPad Air 2 could get a position. Fine on the ground, though, so it's not because of shielding.

    35. Re:Redundant Systems by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The king of dead arguments speaks. Please, seek help, you really need a professional to help you get medicated.

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    36. Re: Redundant Systems by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Seek help, psychiatric disease is a serious issue.

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    37. Re: Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 you brought it on yourself with your lies APK tore you apart on https://slashdot.org/comments.... , http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , https://slashdot.org/comments.... and your butthurt signatures about APK too and putting him down when he's not around bitch tactics too. I also wouldn't say what you did now projecting the fact you are indeed an autistic retard.

    38. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22, those arguments you started left you dead in the water when apk dismantled you with them https://slashdot.org/comments.... , http://slashdot.org/comments.p... , https://slashdot.org/comments.... and you're the brain-damaged autistic retard that needs meds. Thanks for projecting that fault of yours too Coren22.

    39. Re: Redundant Systems by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Another victim of Apple... Get yourself a cheap Android device. You can find plenty of decent ones for $40. Probably a passable one for $15 (just needs to be Android 4.1 or newer).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    40. Re:Redundant Systems by SCPaPaJoe · · Score: 1

      No, I meant 1990's. Hell, you can buy the damn things on Amazon for crying out loud!

    41. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's assuming the satellites themselves don't get attacked. They are sitting ducks to anyone who is capable of attacking them, and China has demonstrated they are able and willing to do so if they want.

    42. Re:Redundant Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago, when i was still reading the GPS related newsgroups, NOTAMs regarding GPS around china lake were a regular occurrence. Is the current one special because it affects a wider area?

  2. Why not press the switch by NotInHere · · Score: 1

    What about telling the satellites directly to not send positional data anymore? After all, I've thought the satellites were put in space by them? Or is this in fact a training program for GLONASS and similar systems which they don't control?

    1. Re:Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not read the first sentence of the summary? How does your comment make any sense in the slightest?

    2. Re:Why not press the switch by Aqualung812 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I see two possibilities, which may both be true:

      1. They want to learn more about what it would take to compromise the existing USA GPS, so they know how to detect such activity and perhaps test countermeasures.

      2. They want to be able to compromise GLONASS and Galileo without compromising the SA GPS signal. However, in testing this, they might get it wrong and take down GPS.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    3. Re:Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What about telling the satellites directly to not send positional data anymore?

      The NOTAM linked stated that they were "testing" GPS systems. It's anybody's guess what the testing consists of, but I would interpret the word to consist of tests like "if we did THIS, what result would it have on the GPS signal? What about THAT, how does THAT affect the GPS?"

      Turning of the satellites doesn't really test anything except the "off" switch.

    4. Re:Why not press the switch by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      Almost certainly the US military wants a plan to shut down GLONASS and Galileo during operations. If the US can shut down any other positioning system at will, then sharing GPS becomes less controversial in other countries because then the other systems may offer no real defense advantage.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an extension of this, may be wanting to see if they can fool and manipulate the GPS on drones for extended stretches of time and such as a possible defense *and offense* for automated drones using GPS for strikes.

    6. Re:Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US didn't like the European GPS Galileo (GNSS), they stuck their dirty paws into that one, and now, GLONASS is available to us all on mobiles.

      Fact is, the US doesn't like anybody meddling in things THEY THINK they should have total control over.

      It is surprisingly easy to not only jam, but inject FAKE positioning information into receivers over a LARGE area with low power.

      Perhaps the people should do that as a pay back for the US disabling the GPS.

    7. Re:Why not press the switch by hawguy · · Score: 1

      Did you not read the first sentence of the summary? How does your comment make any sense in the slightest?

      Still makes sense -- instead of using a jamming device that jams US GPS, why don't they just selectively disable over that region (or turn selective availability back on to degrade accuracy)?

      Now if they were jamming GLONASS or Galileo, then it would make more sense, but why jam something when you can just turn it off at the source?

    8. Re: Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe they are testing a way to jam gps for everyone else and it doesn't affect their receivers?

    9. Re:Why not press the switch by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      What about telling the satellites directly to not send positional data anymore?

      because it's a Global Positioning System.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    10. Re:Why not press the switch by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      They could most certainly turn off civilian GPS on select parts of the planet, like a over a continent. A GPS satellite only serves a given cone below its current position, by turning a satellite off when the cone enters an area you want to block it in, and on again if it leaves it you can block the whole area. It of course only works on bigger "resolutions" like per-continent, but it works.

      Dunno if there is even more precise control. Maybe they have a trick I haven't thought of.

    11. Re:Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might be testing how well their own systems fare in the face of enemy jamming.

    12. Re:Why not press the switch by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      They could most certainly turn off civilian GPS on select parts of the planet, like a over a continent. A GPS satellite only serves a given cone below its current position, by turning a satellite off when the cone enters an area you want to block it in, and on again if it leaves it you can block the whole area.

      your ignorance of GPS technology has been exposed. i suggest you take care of that.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    13. Re:Why not press the switch by russotto · · Score: 1

      They could most certainly turn off civilian GPS on select parts of the planet, like a over a continent. A GPS satellite only serves a given cone below its current position, by turning a satellite off when the cone enters an area you want to block it in, and on again if it leaves it you can block the whole area. It of course only works on bigger "resolutions" like per-continent, but it works.

      Not sure about the current satellites, but the earlier satellites didn't have this capability (or at least the government claimed they didn't)

    14. Re:Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2003 I worked for "a large company" that had a product that used GPS to synchronize clocks across a large area. In March that year all of our systems deployed in SouthEast Asia went offline at the same time due to a single satellite suddenly transmitting the wrong time. After scrambling for a couple of days to patch the software to ignore a bad signal we got things up and running again just as the satellite suddenly corrected itself and started sending the correct time again.
      It just happens that the satellite failure coincided with the start of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. Clearly we never had any proof, but it was widely speculated in our office that GPS in the region had been deliberately disabled until the military had enough control to ensure no counter-strike was possible.

    15. Re:Why not press the switch by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      What about telling the satellites directly to not send positional data anymore?

      Or even better, send plausible but incorrect data. Then the terrorist drone will impact 100 meters off target. If the data is shut off completely, the terrorists will just delay their launch.

    16. Re:Why not press the switch by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Bonus points if it gets re-routed to their home village instead.

    17. Re:Why not press the switch by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Tell me what's wrong about my post.

    18. Re:Why not press the switch by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It could also be a test of GPS v2, or something else that uses similar frequencies. In other words, things that happen to interfere, as opposed to things designed to interfere.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    19. Re:Why not press the switch by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a space-based navigation system that provides location and time information in all weather conditions, anywhere on or near the Earth where there is an unobstructed line of sight to four or more GPS satellites. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... So more complex and there is a great visual diagram of the 24 satellites. So you can not really cut off one region without harming all surrounding regions. Of course using GPS as a weapon only works once because from there on in, no one could trust it any more.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re: Why not press the switch by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are testing a way to jam gps for everyone else and it doesn't affect their receivers?

      That's OK by me.

      My weapons systems have triple-plus fallback redundancy and can easily maintain locks on Washington, D.C. and Alexandria, VA without fail even with all external navigational/positional systems offline.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    21. Re:Why not press the switch by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And why notify the FAA, who explicitly uses US GPS and only US GPS that they are jamming US GPS, when they are only jamming other GPS systems? Are they not sure if their jammers will be too broad spectrum? Or are they doing something else?

    22. Re:Why not press the switch by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Why jam US GPS, when you have the power to turn it off? That is the question. Perhaps the system doesn't allow settings to "black out" a small area of the globe. Perhaps it's not just GPS, but also WAAS (or perhaps only GPS enhancements, like WAAS). With no information we can only speculate. But if you can turn off GPS, jamming it doesn't seem to have a great benefit. Perhaps they are testing anti-jamming. If someone were to jam it, how well can target that jammer?

    23. Re:Why not press the switch by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So you can not really cut off one region without harming all surrounding regions.

      Obviously. Who said you wouldn't be harming the surrounding areas? If it's easy to turn them off and on individually, it should be trivial to black out a single location. Yes, the accuracy of the block is not very granular, and it will affect surrounding areas. Nobody said otherwise.

    24. Re:Why not press the switch by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I have always assumed that the big push for "interoperability" included the ability to jam all of the satellite positioning services within a given area.

    25. Re:Why not press the switch by heypete · · Score: 2

      It's easy to know how a GPS receiver will work if there's no signal: it simply doesn't function.

      But how does it function in the presence of strong jamming signals of different types? Does it produce spurious errors? False position or timing data? Does it have other issues? Can very strong signals cause damage to various components like amplifiers and the exquisitely sensitive receiver circuits?

      I'm just speculating, but I suspect that they'll be doing tests of that type.

    26. Re:Why not press the switch by RevDisk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because likely the Navy is testing how to operate if someone ELSE is jamming GPS. The conspiracy theorists here on Slashdot are kinda missing the obvious.

    27. Re:Why not press the switch by RevDisk · · Score: 2

      Because people other than the US might try to jam US GPS, and the Navy maybe wants to see how well they operate when a hostile foreign entity jams GPS? In other words, routine training but not something they want to advertise. Given that the US owns GPS, they don't need to jam it. Which everyone seems to be missing. They do need to train for GPS being shot down or failing.

    28. Re:Why not press the switch by afidel · · Score: 2

      Because the block II-F birds (12/31) lack selective availability hardware per presidential order and government policy, there is no way to degrade or turn off GPS to a particular region of the globe.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    29. Re:Why not press the switch by aicrules · · Score: 1

      It is only conjecture that the purpose of the devices being tested are to jam GPS. It may very well be, but it might not. The GPS interruption may just be a side effect.

    30. Re:Why not press the switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them try to block the Chinese BeiDou system, Russian Glonass, and European Galileo all at once.
      Galileo is probably backdoored or has a switch given to our NATO friend USA ...

  3. Late to the party by DougOtto · · Score: 1

    This testing actually started last month. We got notification through several DHS related channels.

    --
    Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    1. Re:Late to the party by DougOtto · · Score: 1

      It just wasn't in California so no one cared.

      --
      Solving Unix problems since 1989...
    2. Re:Late to the party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well they shouldn't be testing GPS in California. GPS is known to the State of California to cause cancer, and birth defects or other reproductive harm.

    3. Re:Late to the party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does the Zeka virus but California clearly had no interest in attempting to stop that from migrating into California, now did they?

    4. Re:Late to the party by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Well they shouldn't be testing GPS in California.

      They are doing to interfere with voters driving to the polls today. It is part of the anti-Bernie conspiracy.

    5. Re:Late to the party by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      They question every mosquito at their agricultural checkpoints.

  4. Put on your tin foil hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all part of a government conspiracy to put everyone in concentration camps built out of abandoned Walmart super centers. Yup.

    1. Re:Put on your tin foil hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choke on your fucking astroturf, shitty sockpuppet.

    2. Re: Put on your tin foil hats by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Abandoned? Walmart Supercenters will be the only secured outposts in many regions after the apocalypse.

  5. Mysterious ways of the government by jovius · · Score: 3, Funny

    First they launch the satellites and then they try to jam their signals. It would have been more efficient if they didn't launch the satellites in the first place, me thinks.

    1. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because you think the US is the only one with GPS satellites.

    2. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by guruevi · · Score: 1

      There are actually two types of GPS signals one for US military use and one for civilian use. The civilian GPS system is capable of sending 'bad' information and actually was built with artificial precision issues.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's funny because you think the US is the only one with GPS satellites.

      Technically they are. Russia has GLONASS and the EU should have Galileo fully operational by 2020. China, Japan and India (Beidou, QZSS, and IRNSS) all have their own versions that function regionally, but none are called GPS.

      At the moment only GPS and GLONASS are global. Both China and the EU systems should also be global in 2020.

    4. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is 1 or 100 meters when you are aiming a tack nuke or biological home made cruise missile (NZ garage?).

      In the US they call the use of a tack nuke, SURGICAL STRIKE. and the populous fall for it.

    5. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the generic word for all of these is "global navigation satellite system" (GNSS).

    6. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Selective Availability (the system you're talking about) was turned off permanently in the year 2000 by Clinton, and the new satellites don't have the capability.

      The rationale was that GPS is too useful and too important to screw it up globally, and that it was easier to just deny adversaries the capability on an area basis rather than a global basis. Like, say, what they're doing now as a test.

      SA didn't even work that well since people were working around it - basically discovering the error and broadcasting a correction, using systems called DGPS.

      All paraphrased from the wiki, of course.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    7. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by blindseer · · Score: 2

      Technically the GPS created by the USA is called Navstar but it seems few even know this name.

      GPS is an acronym for global positioning system, which can technically include many things besides satellite navigation. GNSS is what is usually used to group GLONASS, Galileo, Navstar, and so forth since that is an acronym for global navigation satellite system. GNSS are a radio navigation aid, and a global positioning system just like LORAN, VOR, TACAN, and others which are losing favor over the satellite navigation aids.

      Technically using a clock, sextant, charts, and a compass would be a global positioning system but that's extending the definition well beyond common use. They certainly fall under navigation aids, and their use will likely continue well beyond when LORAN and VOR go dark. They'll likely be used well beyond any satellite navigation aid as well.

      Personally I'd like to see more people use Navstar instead of GPS when referring to the US GNSS since it not only is it's proper name but it also reduces confusion since GPS is also used generally to refer to other GNSS. It seems to be a lost cause because even the US federal government is failing to call their own GNSS by its proper name.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    8. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The same link also says that in 2000 they had a system in place that allowed hostile forces to be denied service. So what's this 'new tech' necessary for?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by AK+Marc · · Score: 2
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Navstar redirects to GPS. Navstar is the more public name of DNSS. If you want to be correct, Navstar should likely never be used. The original name is DNSS. The common name is GPS. Navstar is an obsolete common name, so it is neither the most accurate, nor the most common.

      Personally I'd like to see more people use Navstar instead of GPS when referring to the US GNSS since it not only is it's proper name but it also reduces confusion since GPS is also used generally to refer to other GNSS. It seems to be a lost cause because even the US federal government is failing to call their own GNSS by its proper name.

      GPS means one or more GPS (GNSS, as you like to call them, though they are technically unrelated to navigation - you could just as easily call them a global time system, and be no less accurate). US GPS is how I refer to DNSS, as it is unique, and obvious. The only people "confused" are deliberately confused in protest. Nobody knows DNSS or Navstar, and, as you note, nobody uses either, even the government that created it.

    10. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You tie a grenade to a quad-copter drone, and use GPS to deliver it to your ex's house. That's the "military" use that they want to prevent.

    11. Re:Mysterious ways of the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russians always have cooler names!

  6. But..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if you're on the ground, you probably won't notice interference.

    You will see the aircraft based on captured UFOs being tested.

    Why else would they do this? Obviously it has to do with UFO technology.

    Posting as AC for obvious reasons - with an aluminum foil hat lined with plastic wrap - it keeps the government's wifi signals out.

    1. Re:But..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government has added dioxins to plastic wrap to poison anyone who tries this.

    2. Re:But..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sock-puppeteering is strong for this article.

  7. Sonic booms by fremsley471 · · Score: 2

    Slightly off topic, but China Lake related. My rusty memory says that there was an odd series of tests in the eighties where scientists on the west coast thought that they were hearing infrasound from meteors and such like, then realised it was happening once a week at the same time. Speculation was it was related to the testing of a SR71 replacement, but unless I'm much-mistaken. nothing came of it. Thirty-plus years on, can anyone say what it was?

    1. Re:Sonic booms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was aliens. I seen 'em.

    2. Re:Sonic booms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Artillery practice?

    3. Re:Sonic booms by kimvette · · Score: 1

      http://earthsky.org/space/whoo...

      During the leonid storm (2000? 2001?) I heard sounds which sounded like the sizzling sound described in that article but I thought i was imagining it because the metors were 100km or more over my head - way too far for any sound to be heard, let alone simultaneously with the event. It turns out that the sound is real and explainable. :)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    4. Re:Sonic booms by Solandri · · Score: 2

      People think the USAF has a shiny toy with a pulse detonation engine. The sound has also been heard over Texas, New York, and the UK. I know the Daily Mail is a tabloid site, but in true MIB style they've got pretty comprehensive coverage of the topic, including an audio recording and pics of the contrail. The contrail pic is from Texas if I remember. There used to be a good article on that in AvWeek, but they put up a paywall.

      If I remember, the sounds heard in Southern California in the late 1980s, early 1990s were sonic booms. People assumed it was the Space Shuttle landing at Edwards, except there was no Space Shuttle landing those days. Based on when and where people heard the boom and a little triangulation, I think best estimate was whatever it was was traveling around Mach 5-6. (One of the advantages of flying test flights in Southern California is that you've got this great big ocean you can fly over, so there are fewer witnesses to potentially see/hear your super-secret aircraft.)

  8. well thats just perfect. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Funny

    3 hours in a checkpoint with my shoes off, my laptop out, and my belt in a plastic tub as i shuffle with my pants now around my ankles into a giant microwave oven only to have boarded a flight where a thick beard or a mathematics equation on a napkin will get me sent to torture prison wasnt enough. Now, the very agency purportedly keeping me safe from the "terrorists" has knocked out the global system used to guide everything from uber to cruise missiles and my flight to Phoenix is now a flight to Scotland.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:well thats just perfect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Planes track groundbased radio beacons. Even without gps, they should be able to navigate just fine. Now if the place passes though a big area without beacons, like the ocean, then not having gps could becomes problematic. The plane would still be able to navigate using compass and old fashioned navigation skills, but I trust modern systems better, particularly considering modern pilots are more used to those and might have navigation problems if using the old systems, particularly for long range navigation.

      This mean a flight to Phoenix will not end up in Europe. It will end up in Arizona even without gps. I know you were joking, but I still think replying that planes aren't completely lost without gps would be the appropriate response.

      This got me thinking. If the radio signal for gps dies, what about the signals for the beacons? And the radio communication with air traffic controllers? and TCAS (automated collision prediction system, very useful for avoiding mid air collisions)? A modern plane, which loses the ability to use any radio waves could be an issue. Any idea why it would be gps and not radio waves in general?

    2. Re:well thats just perfect. by ragahast · · Score: 1

      Any idea why it would be gps and not radio waves in general?

      Either narrow(er) band interference, or it involves control of the satellites themselves in some way.

      --
      .:Semper Absurda:.
    3. Re:well thats just perfect. by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      my flight to Phoenix is now a flight to Scotland.

      That would justify a thank you note to DHS, not a complaint.

    4. Re:well thats just perfect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you're not going to Ouagadougou. My luggage did; it was meant to go to Oulu.

  9. Ground will still notice. What about time sources? by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2

    The FAA advisory says there is a 253nm ring of interference at 50ft AGL (above ground level)

    So, depending likely on your line of sight to the transmitter, there is a good chance most of Southern California and Nevada are going to have ground-level interference.

    My question is what will happen to the many datacenters with roof-mounted GPS antennas that feed to a local NTP server, which is trusted as a Stratum-1 source inside the company? Those antennas are very likely to be at 50ft AGL or above.

    GPS is just a timestamp. If you're screwing with that, there is a good chance what you're doing is screwing with the time.

    --
    Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  10. In unrelated news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sightings of U.S.S. Eldridge have been seen moving towards the west coast.

  11. Wow by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I gotta say - those Waze Warriors are getting pretty darn serious!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  12. What could possibly go wrong?! by tehlinux · · Score: 1

    Wait, that's a legitimate question.

    --
    Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
  13. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    NOTAMS are deliberately written for the worst possible case. The range of effective jamming generally appear to be about 10% of published range. Additionally, buildings and hills and such will protect you from jammers that are not line of sight to you (L-band) so I'm not terribly concerned ... except of course that the FAA is pushing a very expensive ADS-B mandate which is 100% GPS dependent.

  14. You are about to experience the awe and mystery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Navy is in control of GPS. If the wish to make it louder, they will bring up the volume. If they wish to make it softer, they will tune it to a whisper. They will control the horizontal. They will control the vertical. They can roll the position, invert it or make it flutter. They can change the accuracy to a soft blur or sharpen it to crystal clarity. For the foreseeable future, they will control all that you see and hear. There is nothing wrong with your GPS receiver. You are about to participate in a great adventure. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the surface to -- The Outer Limits (of Earth orbital space).

  15. damn thing just took off by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    see honey? I told you it wasn't my fault!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  16. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    My question is what will happen to the many datacenters with roof-mounted GPS antennas that feed to a local NTP server, which is trusted as a Stratum-1 source inside the company? Those antennas are very likely to be at 50ft AGL or above.

    What normally happens to the NTP servers if the GPS device fails? They run on internal clocks and I'd imagine and demote themselves?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  17. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How would you ever notice a 250 nanometer region of interference?

  18. Not GPS jamming by meerling · · Score: 1

    The GPS systems need to have super accurate timeclocks, so they even have to account for relativistic variations due to orbit and all that.
    So of course if someone were messing around with an FTL drive, or a TARDIS or something like that, it could cause problems. ...
    Yes, it's a joke, but I wonder how many conspiracy nuts will go off the rails on this one. ;)

  19. Clinton 2016! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    The California primary is today.
    Obviously they've turned the mind-control rays up to 11 to ensure the preordained outcome.

    suspiciously close to the horrible truth (tm)

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Clinton 2016! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's dispel with this fiction that our reptilian alien overlords don't know what they're doing. They know exactly what they're doing.

    2. Re: Clinton 2016! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Her turn. You know, like it was Bob Dole's turn...

  20. How convenient by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"GPS interference testing(PDF) will be taking place between 9:30am and 3:30pm Pacific time."

    Why the F would they pick such a time frame to intentionally disrupt the service? Wouldn't 11pm to 5am make a LITTLE more sense?

    1. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the night shift.

    2. Re:How convenient by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Technicians charge extra for after hour calls?

    3. Re:How convenient by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      >"GPS interference testing(PDF) will be taking place between 9:30am and 3:30pm Pacific time."

      Why the F would they pick such a time frame to intentionally disrupt the service? Wouldn't 11pm to 5am make a LITTLE more sense?

      So you want to take away GPS and the sun?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:How convenient by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      They're not trying to make sense (to you), they're trying to test something that we don't have full details on. Perhaps what they're testing requires that time frame. I'm sure that if they could do the test in such a way that nobody knew it was even happening, they would.

    5. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If disruption to aircraft is a concern, I presume they're picking daylight hours in order to ensure that the chances of controlled flight into terrain should a pilot not get the memo are minimized. Disrupting GPS when most pilots have their eyes glued to instruments is just asking for it.

  21. Embraer Phenon 300 loss of stability? by imcdona · · Score: 1

    Anyone know why the FAA specifically mentions the Embraer Phenon 300?
    From the FAA NOTAM: (it's in all caps in the NOTAM)
    ADDITONALLY, DUE TO GPS INTERFERENCE IMPACTS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING EMBRAER PHENOM 300 AIRCRAFT FLIGHT STABILITY CONTROLS, FAA RECOMMENDS EMB PHENOM PILOTS AVOID THE ABOVE TESTING AREA AND CLOSELY MONITOR FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS DUE TO POTENTIAL LOSS OF GPS SIGNAL.

    1. Re:Embraer Phenon 300 loss of stability? by turkeydance · · Score: 1

      “Due to GPS Interference impacts potentially affecting Embraer 300 aircraft flight stability controls, FAA recommends EMB Phenom pilots avoid the testing area and closely monitor flight control systems,” the Notam reads. http://www.avweb.com/avwebflas...

    2. Re:Embraer Phenon 300 loss of stability? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Obviously this plane relies directly on GPS signals for the flight stability controls. In what way exactly? Well unless someone at Embraer will tell you, there's only one way to find out...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Embraer Phenon 300 loss of stability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that is has something to do with the Phenon 300's custom-designed Garmin Prodigy. I'm not a pilot, but apparently it has additional levels of automation over a standard glass cockpit. I can imagine any aircraft with synthetic vision being a liability with unreliable GPS data.

    4. Re:Embraer Phenon 300 loss of stability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Embraer Phenom 300 has a GPS-only derived AHRS (Attitude Heading Reference System) which feeds information to the flight stability controls. The AHRS is what tells the plane which way it's pointing and how it's rolled. Without this information, it's hard to tell in a cloud if you're upside down and headed towards the ground or not. With the right control inputs, you can be in this attitude and still feel like you're upright. (Look up "Bob Hoover ice tea" if you don't think it's possible.)

  22. One or more X37s are in orbit by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    What's the mystery?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  23. Lone Star? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dark Helmet: Raspberry. There's only one man who would dare give me the raspberry: Lone Star!

    [camera moves in closer and closer during his dialog until it smashes into Dark Helmet and knocks him out]

  24. Well under a millisecond. Ntp handles false ticker by raymorris · · Score: 1

    If they skew the time enough to have GPS report a location a mile away from actual location, or even 100 miles away, the time will still be within a millisecond of being correct. Given network delays, few computers need the TOD more accurate than a millisecond. Also, ntpd won't jump a full millisecond all the sudden, it will slowly move closer to the reported time. So all in all I'm guesstimating the time may be off be 10-100 nanoseconds.

    If they skew it by a lot, ntpd will detect it as a "false ticker" and ignore that clock. Typically important ntp servers peer with a few others.

  25. guesses by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    So, here is just a little bit of amateur desk research into some things we might be able to gather from the information:

    The FAA flight advisory provides the coordinates and the nature of the GPS signal disruption, which is centered near China Lake, and has expanding rings of area, each of which rises in altitude. For the pilots out there, imagine the classic upside-down wedding cake shape. Or cone with its point at the ground.

    This would seem to indicate some kind of broadcast or interference from a source that is located at the ground, propagating line of sight with larger radii with altitude. Rather than something to do with the satellite itself.

    The center of the coordinates are 360822N, 1173846W, which is in a big empty desert area, just south (SSW of Darwin, California), see here: https://www.google.com/maps/pl...

    It could of course be some kind of antenna, or even a flight that is producing this signal. But there's also an interesting long V-shaped two-legged testing(?) facility just to the east of these coordinates, which you can see in the Google Earth image. I might be mistaken about what that facility is, because aeronautical sectional charts also show a mine in that area, but this doesn't look like a mine site. Also there are a bunch of vehicles that look like Humvees on the pad nearby. And there are three antenna looking structures at the north end of the paved line.

    Anyway, it's interesting to speculate about.

    1. Re:guesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work there, it's a rarely used SNORT track.

    2. Re:guesses by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      Cool to know -- thank you! I was wrong.

    3. Re:guesses by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Sightly to the northeast of the center is this facility with some kind of circular clearing around it and antennas inside. What looks like military trucks and/or trailers are parked just outside to the northwest:

      https://www.google.com/maps/pl...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:guesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last thing you want is a supersonic rocket failing in a spectacular fashion ANYWHERE near people. The city has grown into a lot of areas where the base used to be years ago (the base ceded all the military housing areas to the city in the late 80's early 90's). using the *new* SNORT track for the big experimental testing is a now a bad idea due to it only being a few miles from lots of people, homes and businesses..

    5. Re:guesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      testing range for missile launches. the buildings are actually bunkers and those trucks are for Data collection. they aren't out there all the time.

  26. Everyone will be listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing that you can be sure of now is that both the Chinese and Russians will be "listening" in very intently to everything that goes on during those days in the southwestern USA.

    What do I mean by "listening"? Collecting lots of EMR, be it from satellites or cars parked somewhere or whatever else happens to be handy. While *we* may not know what the results of the test are, you can bet that the Chinese and Russians will.

    1. Re:Everyone will be listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the listening from an Embraer Phenom 300? Oops.

      But really, you're probably right. Suspect the real purpose here is to see 1) how to effectively block GPS locally (battlefield scale) without taking out the satellites; 2) how to work without GPS, assuming (rightly) that in any real conflict the first thing to go will be GPS satellites.

  27. Drones by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    Testing their drone jammer?

    1. Re:Drones by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe testing the anti-drone-jammer. Presumably the military would like to use GPS when jamming is in effect, and Iran claims to have captured a US drone by some combination of jamming and false GPS signals.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  28. Just a few notes by Caerdwyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No doubt all of this is in bits and pieces elsewhere. Feel free to mark redundant.

    1. The GPS system is owned and operated by the military. Civilians are secondary users. They get to turn it off any time they want, or reduce its accuracy, etc.

    2. People already use readily-available GPS jammers, primarily to steal LoJack-equipped cars. Not sure why they're legal to sell, as a device intended solely for disabling a military-owned system, but http://www.thesignaljammer.com...

    3. My money is on the military testing its resiliency to deliberate wide-area jamming or attacks on GPS satellites. It's an obvious way to seriously affect the US military without shooting soldiers, so some countries/NGOs might be more willing to do this than, say, blowing up a bus. My money is also on testing during thesummer during the day because pilots can... y'know... look out the window and see where they are. VFR conditions pretty much guaranteed. (yes, yes, at FL180 up you're in class A airspace and always are on instrument rules, but even A380 pilots need to use eyeballs)

    4. There are no commercial aircraft that rely ONLY on GPS. VOR and DME are widely used (especially VOR), and pilots are trained to be able to navigate using those methods (evne non-commercial license holders and non-instrument-rating license holders).

    5. I'm a pilot. Only private, but I can navigate perfectly well without GPS, and the plane I most commonly rent doesn't even have GPS. And as a pilot, I'm nothing special. If I were flying in that area, I'd do nothing differently whatsoever.

    6. I'm not sure what's up with that Embraer. Something to look up tonight.

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    1. Re:Just a few notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia GPS is now the primary means of navigation. Most ground based navigation aids have been pulled out or left to rot after they failed. So much for GNSS.

    2. Re:Just a few notes by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      Yeah the Phenom thing is a good one, we were trying to figure that out earlier in hangar flying. (Also a PPL.)

      This is certainly a military "area denial" test, with the secondary effect of "aviation users, let us know if there's any gotchas we didn't know about as we move to GPS-only" (NextGen). Probably there will be no actual impact, and if there is, between pilotage, dead-reckoning, and VORs pilots should be just fine. If they aren't, they really shouldn't be flying anyway. IFR makes things slightly more interesting, but then again they have ATC to work with.

      Aviation GPS is unlike your car or phone, and it comes with a wide range of self-monitoring built in. First RAIM and now WAAS can tell you if you're experiencing a degradation of sufficient magnitude to mess up your navigation - in particular, a RNAV approach - and you need to switch to an alternate (or go missed, for the approach case).

      The interesting thing here is that WAAS will be affected, but the FAA doesn't require you to have a non-GPS backup to operate under instrument flight rules (IFR) if your GPS is WAAS. So I guess if you're IFR you should just not go there...? Or have a backup... (for this one case)? That's the only thing that's weird to me. They need a better story here.

      The military does these things all the time. Not sure why this one is making the news - here's an identically-sized one from 2015 (the reason for the identical size rings is just line-of-sight plus earth curvature to those altitudes)

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    3. Re:Just a few notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS can be jammed by just flooding the area with spectrum white noise - it's so low bitrate and wideband that even local broadcasting can fuck with it.

      If you want to steal a GPS tracked car, all you'd need to do is hook a microwave up to a battery and place it in the car and turn it on while driving it. Microwaves are legally sold jamming devices.

    4. Re:Just a few notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm sure there's an element of testing resilience to wide-area jamming - it's also very likely that the military wants to be able to implement wide-area jamming itself.

      After all, you don't think the US army are the only military with GPS devices, do you? The Russians have their own, and the Chinese and Europeans theoretically do, but what do you imagine, e.g., the Iranian army uses?

    5. Re:Just a few notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in 2000 under President Clinton "Selective Availability" (wherein the GPS signals were degraded for reasons of national security) was discontinued. So although the military does pay for and maintain GPS, it's become critical enough to the infrastructure of the US that the military can no longer arbitrarily degrade or disable the system.

      And as a pilot I'm sure you're aware of ADS-B, wherein aircraft transponders determine position using GPS, and then transmit that positional information to FAA ground receivers.

      Currently the FAA air traffic system is capable of using several different position determination systems (including its aging primary and secondary radar sites). However, under NextGen over time the FAA plans on letting its aging radar systems fail and eventually use just ADS-B for ATC use.

      One of the safety nets of the U.S. aviation system is that there are redundancies. Navigation and air traffic surveillance have separate systems so that if one or the other fails there are still backups.

      I.e. if the air traffic radar fails pilots can still report to ATC their positions and ATC (ideally) can use non-radar separation. By the same token if a pilot's navigation system fails ATC can use its radar to guide it.

      However, under the FAA's NextGen they plan on using GPS-based systems for both aircraft navigation and aircraft separation. That means in the future that without GPS much of the aviation system in the U.S. would be made inoperative.

      A terrible idea really because of the lack of redundancy, but that's the plan.

  29. Re: Bush put this plan into motion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the order was written in a way that Obama couldn't undo it.

  30. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

    The FAA advisory says there is a 253nm ring of interference at 50ft AGL (above ground level)

    So, depending likely on your line of sight to the transmitter, there is a good chance most of Southern California and Nevada are going to have ground-level interference.

    Take a look at a topo map of southern California. We've got the San Gabriel Mountains between us (LA/Orange/Ventura counties) and China Lake. Ain't no little hill, neither.

  31. An uneducated guess by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I were to make an uneducated guess, I would be thinking along the lines of a live fire test of their next generation cruise missiles. ( Something like LRASM )

    One of the requirements of the next gen systems is their ability to operate in a communications / GPS denied environment.

    So best guess is, sometime within the month, a live fire launch from a platform in the Pacific should be expected. Especially if the target area is China Lake AND the FAA is involved.

    Will very likely have a chase plane or two following it during the course of its flight.

    Just a guess though :)

    1. Re:An uneducated guess by afidel · · Score: 1

      Probably not live fire, as someone posted up-thread the center of the cone is adjacent to the second longest rocket sled test track in the world, they're probably doing a test on the receivers as they travel down the track near the jammer.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  32. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Servers running NTP (properly setup) will just conclude that the time server has gone insane and will stop using it as a reference (even if it's their only source of time). The better setups augment the on-premise PPS stratum 0 clock with 3-4 off-site NTP pool servers. That way, the majority of the time, the servers will prefer the on-premise clock (which hopefully has low jitter and high accuracy), but won't follow it blindly over the abyss when it goes insane.

  33. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nm == nautical mile. 1 nm = 1852 meters
    253 nm == 468.556 kilometers, or 291.15 miles.

  34. Finally by meglon · · Score: 3, Funny

    They've managed to reconstruct the crashed UFO from Roswell (which was actually a German V3 made in conjunction with a planned attack by the blue aliens in 1944) with the help of a benevolent Bigfoot that was living near Loch Ness, and are moving it out of the hanger for test flights. No, really... The History Channel documentary on the project should be on later this week.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the History Channel is involved, how long until they reveal Hitler's connection to this project from his current day secret base in Alaska?

  35. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the Central Valley area there is the Sierra Nevada which is still a good bit higher as well. (Also Shields the bay area up to some elevation) , plus for parts of the bay area the Coastal Mountains.

  36. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... nm is not a nautical mile. nm is unambiguously a nanometer (even in the US).

  37. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here:

    nm == nanometre. 1 nm = 0.000000001 meters
    NM == nautical mile. 1 NM = 1852 meters
    253 NM == 468.556 kilometers, or 291.15 miles.

    FTFY :-)

    I think you can have 'nmi' if you like...

  38. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The abbreviation nm, though conflicting with the SI symbol for the nanometre, is also sometimes used.

    Do you read what you link to?

  39. Re:Ground will still notice. What about time sourc by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    GPS is just a timestamp. If you're screwing with that, there is a good chance what you're doing is screwing with the time.

    Aha! Solid evidence that the US military is building a time machine! I knew it!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  40. Loran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyway, even in the 1960's experimental LORAN modes had accuracies under 6 meters, which is comparable to modern GPS. Money was not put in to develop this to wide deployment, but there was no major technical limitation. Some LORAN-C stations were still online as recently as 2 or 3 years ago, to serve as redundancy since GPS is easy to jam or destroy outright.

    The USCG shutdown their Loran network in ~2010 to save $190M over five years (~$40M/year). The DoD actually wanted them to keep it around as a backup for GPS, but it was not to be.

    Sadly, the USCG also started dismantling the towers and antennas for their Loran network, so now that everyone is interested in a backup system again, a lot of things have to be rebuilt from scratch.

    There's a functioning eLoran system in the UK/EU I believe, and South Korea is also building one (due to the North's jamming of GPS).

  41. Replicating Iran's US Drone Capture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a military experiment to see if they can replicate the method used by Iran to capture our drone several years ago, because, admittedly, our military has no idea how Iran was able to spoof the encrypted GPS channel. The Pentagon has been trying for years to figure it out, but as usual, the Chinese military is WAY ahead of us with its technology. And, as usual, we are incompetent because our military has become another socioeconomic welfare system. "Free money for college!" Right. Let's just ruin it a little more.

  42. Mysterious tests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like nothing good.

    But in any event you paid for it once so far.

    1. Re:Mysterious tests? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American taxpayers paid for the government ability to jam their GPS. What could go wrong?

  43. GPS is incredibly easy to jam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's probably a countermeasure test of a GPS/Glonass jammer. GPS is simply a convenient guinea pig but the actual targets are EU, Russian and Chinese nav systems that are compatible with GPS signals.