Slashdot Mirror


Sony Confirms It's Making a 'High-End PlayStation 4' With 4K and Richer Graphics (ft.com)

Sony has confirmed it is working on an upgraded version of its PlayStation 4 gaming console (could be paywalled; alternate source). The company says that the upcoming console dubbed Neo is intended to sit alongside and complement the standard PS4. Touted as the "high-end PS4", the gaming console will support ultra-high definition 4K resolution and richer graphics, and will certainly cost more than PlayStation 4's $350 retail price.

The move might upset many PlayStation 4 owners, especially the ones who have purchased the console in the recent months. One of the perks of purchasing a gaming console from Sony and Microsoft is knowing that neither company will launch an upgraded version of their respective console for around six to seven years. Sony realizes that it is playing with fire here, so it assured that all forthcoming games -- including the VR ones -- must support the older version of the console as well. The company says that the new PS4 console won't be unveiled at E3 tradeshow next week, however.

142 comments

  1. Downward compatibility by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    If all games released from this point on will support both the Neo and Original PS4, then what is the point of buying the Neo if you already have an Original?

    1. Re:Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just because it supports the old one, doesn't mean it will support it properly. Inevitably many games will come out with only the new one in mind, and half assed measures to meat whatever minimum requirements sony has set out for support of old model will be made

    2. Re:Downward compatibility by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      nevitably many games will come out with only the new one in mind

      Yep. Get ready to get fucked if you're an existing PS4 owner. Because the developers will start focusing on the Neo and optimizing for that instead of the regular PS4 (and all the demo videos will be shown on the Neo too). So regular PS4 owners can look forward to shitty frame rates and crappier, half-assed graphics as their machine tries to run games that were designed with the Neo in mind.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    3. Re:Downward compatibility by phishybongwaters · · Score: 2

      Are you stunned? Seriously? The neo is more powerful. The backwards compatibility literally means they have to continue to produce low quality ports of those games for my Ps4. how did those ps4 games that got ported to ps3 look? This will be worse And you know what? Good. This is officially the last gaming console I will ever purchase because it's not worth the hassle and they are now officially on a faster upgrade path than a desktop gaming pc. Game over sony, you've earned the last penny you will ever see directly from me.

    4. Re:Downward compatibility by phishybongwaters · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, my ps4 gathers dust as it is, but now it's already last gen? A big old fuck you to sony and crew.

    5. Re:Downward compatibility by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      If some of the disasters from the previous console generation are anything to go by(did they ever get Skyrim actually working properly on the PS3?), there is a real risk that the original will be 'supported' rather than actually supported by at least some games; at least if it becomes popular enough to be the favored target platform.

      It wouldn't be a huge surprise if it doesn't gain that much traction(attempts to update consoles between 'generations' have historically gone pretty poorly); in which case it'll be the 'Neo' that becomes a dubious value, since 4k video playback is pretty niche; and since even the fastest gaming PCs money can buy struggle under the demands of 4k resolution on modern titles with all the pretty sliders cranked up, the 'Neo' has very little chance of actually delivering '4k gaming' without serious compromises(though it could quite plausibly be a substantial improvement on the base PS4).

    6. Re:Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, Sony are having to bully developers into bothering to support Neo at all, because there's like zero installed base for it and it's a PITA. You can't use Neo for anything new or add anything to your game that requires Neo. Pretty much it's for 4K support, for all those billions of people with 60Hz 4K TVs, plus it should run Morpheus stuff a lot nicer. You're not even allowed to have it run 30FPS on PS4 base and 60FPS on Neo. If it's 60FPS on Neo it has to be 60FPS on the base PS4 too.

    7. Re: Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^

      I love overwatch on ps4, but can't pry myself away from league of legends.

    8. Re:Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So developers will target Neo and crank down texture, model and shader details to get their game to run on last-gen PS4. It's no different than turning down graphics settings in PC games to get them to run on shit rigs.

    9. Re: Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Better graphics and performance.

    10. Re:Downward compatibility by TylerJWhit · · Score: 2

      I like how we want bigger and better, but we don't want bigger and better.

    11. Re:Downward compatibility by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      With Old School Gaming.

      The IBM CGA Display that was plugged into the TV over composite vs. RGB often offered better gaming experience making a 16 color pallet from 4 color display, As it allowed for more colors to be shown at the expense of Crispness.
      Also Later on when Playing an EGA game on a VGA monitor the pixels were more blocky on the VGA screen, vs, the Lower DPI on the EGA display, making the 16 Color EGA graphics look more realistic (cartoon like) as the pixels were more rounded.
      Even when you switch from the CRT to LCD screens when the Aspect Ratio changed there is aliasing involved to try to get images to fit on the screen.

      I expect if you have 1080p games they will look better at 1080p vs 4k trying to emulate 1080p

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    12. Re:Downward compatibility by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Other point: If all games released from this point on will have to support multiple platforms and aren't able to be optimised for the experience of a single unit, what is the point of having a console?

    13. Re:Downward compatibility by Karlt1 · · Score: 1

      Technology improves rapidly: News at 11.

    14. Re:Downward compatibility by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Only if they sell a lot of them.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    15. Re:Downward compatibility by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      News at 11 too slow, already read about it this morning on the web.

    16. Re:Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhhh, it's almost like the console community will get a taste of what they've done to PC gaming for years. Cry me ar iver.

    17. Re:Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to wonder why your posts were so angry and foolish, but now that you've revealed how poor you are in another thread, I can understand it. I'm still embarrassed for you, but I understand why the quality of your posts is so low.

    18. Re:Downward compatibility by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It really depends on how many they sell. Developers will target the most popular machine, which almost certainly be the standard PS4 for some time, because it's more profitable. The developers I have spoken to say they are targeting the PS4 and planning to simply add some better textures and a few extra shader effects, then bump the resolution to 4k for the Neo. Most people don't even have a 4k TV yet.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:Downward compatibility by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Are you stunned? Seriously? The neo is more powerful. The backwards compatibility literally means they have to continue to produce low quality ports of those games for my Ps4. how did those ps4 games that got ported to ps3 look? This will be worse And you know what? Good. This is officially the last gaming console I will ever purchase because it's not worth the hassle and they are now officially on a faster upgrade path than a desktop gaming pc. Game over sony, you've earned the last penny you will ever see directly from me.

      It shouldn't be tough to do at all. On the PC I can switch between 1080p, 2k and 4k with the click of a button. It should be the same for the console's. I'm more upset that there's still no mention of uncapping FPS at 30. It's ridiculous that in today's market you are still capped at an old TV's frame rate.

    20. Re:Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nevitably many games will come out with only the new one in mind

      Yep. Get ready to get fucked if you're an existing PS4 owner. Because the developers will start focusing on the Neo and optimizing for that instead of the regular PS4 (and all the demo videos will be shown on the Neo too). So regular PS4 owners can look forward to shitty frame rates and crappier, half-assed graphics as their machine tries to run games that were designed with the Neo in mind.

      This never comes up when we talk about PC gaming... huh.

    21. Re:Downward compatibility by Wootery · · Score: 1

      Err, seriously? It's right there in the title. It literally could not be any clearer.

      4K and Richer Graphics

    22. Re:Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, Sony's VR is going to be a shitshow if developers have to support operating on a 4 year old midrange GPU.

    23. Re:Downward compatibility by donaldm · · Score: 1

      If all games released from this point on will support both the Neo and Original PS4, then what is the point of buying the Neo if you already have an Original?

      The current PS4's can output 4k content although it can't play the new three layer BluRays of which the specifications were only ratified on a year ago. However, the PS4 will not support 4k gaming which requires a powerful graphics card with additional power supply requirements and possibly an increase in CPU power as well. To do this will require a case change since the new machine will require enhanced cooling compared to the original.

      At the moment, we still don't have any idea what the specifications of the Neo will be so it would be rather stupid for game developers to even contemplate making games for the Neo until they get those specifications, also it would be rather shortsighted getting a 40 million plus user base offside just to support an enhanced console which is not out yet, so basically nothing has changed.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    24. Re:Downward compatibility by donaldm · · Score: 1

      It may come as a shock to you but the total human population of this planet is a little over 7.1 Billion. There may be a billion HDTV's and monitors but over a billion 4K display units get real!

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    25. Re:Downward compatibility by donaldm · · Score: 1

      It really depends on how many they sell. Developers will target the most popular machine, which almost certainly be the standard PS4 for some time, because it's more profitable. The developers I have spoken to say they are targeting the PS4 and planning to simply add some better textures and a few extra shader effects, then bump the resolution to 4k for the Neo. Most people don't even have a 4k TV yet.

      Why buy a low-resolution 4k display when you can purchase an 8k display? Admiddltly 8k displays are not exactly cheap but they will come down in price and if 4k is anything to go this will happen fairly quickly. :-)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    26. Re:Downward compatibility by donaldm · · Score: 1

      did they ever get Skyrim actually working properly on the PS3

      If you are referring to the 6MB bug/annoyance then no, but you could work around the issue by turning off all auto-saves and stick with manual saves. The problem with manual saves is if you forget then you may loose hours of playtime if your character died. Still if you are used to the Souls games and even Bloodborne this is not a big deal.

      As for the rest of your comment about the Neo, I fully agree.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    27. Re: Downward compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird strategy. 4k is expensive and has few sources. Netflix 4k costs more and requires high bandwidth. Can't imagine more than a percent of TVs are 4k. They're banking on a new tech which may not take off till it gets cheaper.

    28. Re: Downward compatibility by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      A large percentage of new TV sales are 4K (in the 50" and up sizes) because the cost penalty is small so you might as well get it. The percentage of the installed base is still small. And remember that Sony also sells 4K TVs; they may be hoping that the updated console also drives some TV upgrades.

      True, Netflix 4K costs more. But it's only $2/month more after the recent price increase for the HD subscription. It also gets you four simultaneous streams instead of two, so some families may already have the 4K subscription just for that. 4K on Amazon Prime doesn't cost anything extra. There isn't a huge amount to watch in 4K yet, but Netflix is now making all their shows in 4K and Amazon is doing the same for non-children's shows. Current theatrical films are mostly shot and rendered in 4K, so 4K streaming of those will probably be available when they start showing up on streaming services.

    29. Re:Downward compatibility by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

      Or next week on /.

  2. Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play... by sid+crimson · · Score: 2

    ...and if they're better in 4K, I'll buy it. Otherwise, it's still lipstick on a pig.

  3. Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So which advertised features will be the first to get disabled in a few months? So sorry, Sony. "Fooled me once, can't get fooled again."

    1. Re:Yeah, right by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

      Unless you bought a launch ps3 that actually listed that feature on the box (Like I did) just go ahead and shut the fuck up about "install other os" what the fuck were you going to use yellowdog for?

    2. Re:Yeah, right by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      OtherOS was NOT mentioned on the box. I don't know why people think it was. If you have a CECHA/CECHB/CECHE model, it will list PS2 games, but the box itself doesn't mention OtherOS.

      Go on, check, and take pictures. I'll wait.

  4. Alongside? by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

    So they said it will complement the original; is this an add-on like the 32X or the SegaCD was for the Genesis? If so, that's not so bad for current owners.

    --
    -SaNo
    1. Re:Alongside? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they said it will complement the original; is this an add-on like the 32X or the SegaCD was for the Genesis?

      Yeah, that's what's really confusing to me. Either this guy is retarded, doesn't speak good engrish, or is very confused about the product. Because every report I've heard said it was a stand-alone new console, not an add-on.

    2. Re:Alongside? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's marketing doublespeak meant to placate the current PS4 owners.

      It means the PS4 Neo will be $499 or more and the original PS4 will be $299 until production contracts and stock run out. At this point, owners of the original PS4 will be at the mercy of the install base of the PS4 Neo. As more people buy the Neo, Sony will relax restrictions on developers, allowing them to shit out games that run like ass, don't have all the features enabled, or simply don't work at all on the PS4.

      The PS4 is dead, long live the PS4. (I'm glad I haven't purchased one yet. My main use would be as a UHD BluRay player, and I expect the Neo to boast all the 4K, 10-bit, HDR, etc. features as an Ultra HD BluRay player.)

  5. Huh.... by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    So first we get a report of an XBox One Two, and now a Playstation Four Two. I predict that the next go around, people won't even bother buying the first release with the expectation of a more powerful half-way release of the same system.

    1. Re:Huh.... by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      A popular(?) theory is that now that Sony and Microsoft have fairly standardized hardware they are switching to a more iPhone type release schedule, where they will be releasing updated versions at a more regular interval but maintaining support and continuing releases for the previous (mini) generation.

      By which theory in another two or three years they'll come out with XBOne.Three and PS4.3 and the original XBOne and PS4 will be retired from active development but the XBOne.Two and PS4.2 will still be supported.

      I guess idea of a switch from generations to an "ecosystem" is that it will help keep users and developers locked in instead of having to re-compete for the same user base. I have no idea if it will actually work out that way, but we'll see.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:Huh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't it also make sense from a manufacturing cost perspective if they're using 3rd party components? I know they're not going down to the local Best Buy to pick up RAM and CPUs, but there's a cost to requiring older components after a period of time.

  6. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pigs with lipstick sell better, bacon tastes about the same.
    same is true of video games, graphics don't make the game, the gameplay makes the game, graphics sell the game

  7. If incrimental upgrades are going to be the norm by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had may as well go back to PC gaming. I went to consoles expecting the simplicity and ease of the traditional 5-year life cycle and standard hardware.

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
  8. What do you mean, "sit alongside"? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The company says that the upcoming console dubbed Neo is intended to sit alongside and complement the standard PS4.

    Is that supposed to a metaphor, or a literal truth? Is it designed to be put next to/connected to a PS4? And then say nice things about it?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:What do you mean, "sit alongside"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that supposed to a metaphor, or a literal truth? Is it designed to be put next to/connected to a PS4?

      No, I think they mean sit along side it on the retail shelf, not in your entertainment center.

      And then say nice things about it?

      No, complement. You are thinking of compliment

    2. Re:What do you mean, "sit alongside"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, exactly that.

    3. Re:What do you mean, "sit alongside"? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, complement. You are thinking of compliment

      Yeah, right, next you're gonna tell me that differential equations is not really respectful math.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:What do you mean, "sit alongside"? by Kinwolf · · Score: 1

      The return of the 32X!!

  9. You mean "Nintendo" by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    One of the perks of purchasing a gaming console from Sony and Microsoft is knowing that neither company will launch an upgraded version of their respective console for around six to seven years.

    Launching a 32GB WiiU Delux alongside the 8GB WiiU was a bold move for Nintendo; previously, they'd only released handhelds in multiple colors or with smaller or larger form factors. The Wii got a mini-version that nobody bought; the Gameboy got the Gameboy Pocket, while the Gameboy Advance got the Gameboy Advance SP and Gameboy Advance Micro. Even the DS only got the DSXL (bigger screen), while the 3DS got the 3DSXL and the 2DS (runs 3DS software without 3D display). These are all budget options or larger screens on handhelds, which can only output to their built-in screen; the WiiU Delux was the first Nintendo console to offer a functional upgrade (all other revisionary hardware ran the same software with the same results if following the same actions).

    Sony and Microsoft have a long history of upgrading consoles to have bigger and better specs, rather than simply slimmed form and budget options. A lot of "you bought an XBox so you can have an XBox until the next console comes out, but not really, because you're going to have to buy a new XBox because new games are going to preload 60GB of content to the hard disk and you're going to experience 40 minute load times without XBox with HD-DVD!"

    1. Re: You mean "Nintendo" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing a few on the Nintendo list there.
      DSi ran DS games, and also had exclusives that didn't run on classic DS
      "New 3ds"/"new 3dsxl" It's a 3ds with better 3d (no more ghosting if you're not dead center in front of screen) and a second analogue stick. Most but not all new releases work on classic 3ds.

    2. Re:You mean "Nintendo" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo 64 had a functional RAM upgrade, you needed it to play Perfect Dark.

    3. Re:You mean "Nintendo" by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      Good ol' Wikipedia:
      Only 2 games "needed" the expansion pak, Legend of Zelda - Majora's Mask and Donkey Kong 64. In the former it increased texture detail and removed fog like was seen in Ocarina of Time. In Donkey Kong 64 it was needed to enhance graphics and expand the environments... oh, and there was that game-crashing bug that happened without the expansion pack. That's why they bundled it with that game.

      There were a handful of other games that made use of it for things like higher resolution, larger textures, larger environments, or higher frame rates.

      Since the PS4 is basically an AMD-based PC running a modified BSD, I think this "Neo" is going to be little more than a bump between performance levels of a laptop. If they continue down the road, I'd expect to see "Recommends at least PS4.x, required minimum console PS4.2 'NEO'" much like you see the recommended vs required for PC games. Time will tell if it makes sense to the consumer to buy a new PS4 every 3-5 years (or less).

  10. Remember when Sony fucked PS3 owners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by removing the capability to install another O/S on the console? A capability that I had paid for, by deliberately buying the fat model while the less power-hungry slim PS3 edition was already out.

    Sony realizes that it is playing with fire here

    Frankly, I don't think they give a fuck about their customers. Never have, never will.

    1. Re:Remember when Sony fucked PS3 owners by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      Lets not forget their removal of backwards compatibility for all the later models. If they wanted to pull out the hardware for it, that's fine, but even dropping the software support for it? Weak.

  11. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It had "do not buy" practically stamped on it when it launched, just like the XBone. Framelocked at 30 fps, struggling at even 720p... even 3 years ago that was behind what was expected.

    The only thing consoles have going for them is they are
    1. Slightly more fungible
    2. Have exclusive titles

    that's it.

  12. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by avandesande · · Score: 1

    If you were aching for 4k gaming you probably would have already done this.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  13. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by SScorpio · · Score: 1

    Is it really that bad is a new version comes out every three years, but each model still supports all of the older games and gets new games going forward for 6-8 years?

    You could skip every other release and still play everything. This will also help PC games, as newer hardware will drive developers to actually support new graphic capabilities. Unlike in the PS3/360 generation which went on way to long and held the PC back.

  14. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by squiggleslash · · Score: 0

    PC gaming

    I'm glad to hear it. You'll find playing games that don't discriminate against minorities and avoid uses of offensive and discriminatory language much more appealing when you switch to Politically Correct gaming.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  15. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by phishybongwaters · · Score: 1

    It's not just about graphics, it's about memory and processing power too, and what developer is going to limit their games to the specs of a ps3 when a ps4 is around? None. So why on earth would they produce games for the ps4 when the 4k edition is going to be the dev kit they are building on. your statement only makes sense if you know nothing about games and game design. A kickass idea, with great gameplay, is still a steaming pile of shit at 15 FPS with long load times, and that's exactly what ps4 owners can expect once the NEO dev kits are shipped, shitty half assed ports with lower res textures and absolutely NO testing. Consoles aren't PCs, you can not have 2 consoles from the same developer last, you will always see the better performing device win out.

  16. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by wickedsteve · · Score: 2

    PC gaming is cheaper. Online multiplayer is without monthly fees. There are truly free games with no subscription fees on Steam, GOG and Origin, maybe others. Build your own PC for the same price as a console with more power and greater functionality. Replace your own parts... yada yada yada . . .

  17. mainly for blu ray 4k / streeming 4k? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    mainly for blu ray 4k / streeming 4k?

    1. Re:mainly for blu ray 4k / streeming 4k? by Aerokii · · Score: 2

      Sure as hell not going to be for 4K gaming at any price point the average console player is going to spend. I'll be shocked if they can get decent 4K running for less than $800.

    2. Re:mainly for blu ray 4k / streeming 4k? by jason777 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind they have the luxury of subsidizing the extra hardware cost because hardware prices drop. They may eat the cost and not profit on the hardware for a year or two.

    3. Re:mainly for blu ray 4k / streeming 4k? by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and that's been their strategy for a while now (selling consoles at a loss to start), but given that many computers still have difficulty doing 4K at a stable rate this would be one HELL of a cost to eat. I'm very curious as to what the technical load out ends up being when all is said and done.

  18. Not sure I get the strategy here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consoles are losing steam about as quickly as mobile apps, which looked like they were going to be the answer for a few years... One of the few advantages to buying one, in my opinion anyway (it's why I bought a PS4), is that you don't have to upgrade them every few years to play newer games, you can play whatever's targeted for that system. Of course if nothing winds up being targeted for that system (e.g. Sega Saturn), you can lose pretty big...but if you're going to have to buy another $400-600 console every three or four years, why not buy a PC for the same price that does more at this point? Especially with the bottom dropping out of prices on desktop PC hardware...

  19. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

    I had may as well go back to PC gaming. I went to consoles expecting the simplicity and ease of the traditional 5-year life cycle and standard hardware.

    That's quite a bad reason to go to console gaming. A gaming rig that's just a little more expensive than the Xbox or Playstation will last ten years or more (i.e. you can play games 10 years later at near-max settings without much problem). Plus you get an awesome desktop for when you're not gaming.

  20. What's really going to upset people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is when this is required for PlayStation VR. Hell, my GTX970 has trouble keeping up with games like Elite: Dangerous in VR; I have no idea how the current run of consoles are expecting to pull that off.

    1. Re:What's really going to upset people... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Which resolution and graphics settings are you using? You're probably way over what the VR titles on the PS4/PS4Neo will require.

    2. Re:What's really going to upset people... by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      Which resolution and graphics settings are you using? You're probably way over what the VR titles on the PS4/PS4Neo will require.

      Exactly. Currently PS4 is capped at 30 FPS. I'm sure he's pushing for at least 60FPS or much higher on the PC.

    3. Re:What's really going to upset people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, 30 FPS doesn't cut it for VR. Anything below 90 per eye and I start getting naucious..

  21. Don't know why everyone is so surprised... by johannesg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the past we had long console life cycles because Sony et al. had to recoup their investment in developing that hardware in the first place. Nowadays it is AMD doing all the development, so a quick platform upgrade is as simple as calling AMD and asking for the latest chips. And why wouldn't they? Especially since the competition is going to be doing the exact same thing... So in order to avoid falling behind, there is only one choice: upgrade.

    Long life cycles were never an intended goal of consoles to begin with. They were an _accident_, and since everyone has now standardized on PC hardware they are no longer necessary or even desirable.

  22. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Considering consoles have been holding back PC's for the better part of a decade, you'll easily find that your 5 year old PC is still good enough to play today's titles without too much of a problem. My dad got my old PC to game on, it's a Phenom I X4-945BE w/560Ti in it and it does everything he wants. My sister built a similar PC, it ran her around $110 for all the parts and still does a just fine job.

    Consoles haven't offered anything over a PC in nearly 15 years, and have handily made themselves less competitive by doing things like charging for multiplayer or attempting to lock all your games to only your account. Nevermind backwards compatibility, something that you can do on a PC.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  23. Re: If incrimental upgrades are going to be the no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about running new games 10 years from now on max settings. But overall i agree with what your saying. I just think you went a little overboard ;)

  24. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by nine-times · · Score: 1

    See, I kind of think of it in the opposite way. What I want most from consoles is just the fact that I don't have to wonder "will it run?" It would make sense to me if Sony released a new Playstation model every year with better capabilities, but maintaining compatibility. Sort of like what smartphone vendors do-- Apple releases a new iPhone every year, but I don't have to buy all new apps every time I get a new iPhone. With every new iPhone, I get something a little faster and with new features, but apps almost always work with an iPhone that's a few years old. I don't have to buy a new iPhone every year, but I can if I want to.

  25. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to hear it. You'll find playing games that don't discriminate against minorities and avoid uses of offensive and discriminatory language much more appealing when you switch to Politically Correct gaming.

    That's either the worst joke, or the biggest troll I've seen today. I'm betting on the latter. Especially considering the politically correct and their pro-male killing, pro-sexism, pro-racism, statements that continually pop out of their mouths. Then again, not sure what's worse. That I can't tell the difference between a politically correct person and a bigot/racist/sexist from the 1950's, or that they think they're actual champions of inclusivity while they push for anti-egalitarian ideals.

    Up in next reply: Parent post cries that people who dislike new ghostbusters movie are sexist, then virtue signals so hard that they nearly self-combust.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  26. But not fully backwards compatible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something everyone seems to have overlooked:

    “All games will support the standard PS4 and we anticipate all or a very large majority of games will also support the high-end PS4,” he said.

    There will be games that run on the original PS4 but not the "PS4.5". Brilliant.

    1. Re:But not fully backwards compatible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously it can't be backwards-compatible with a system that has better hardware.

      Brilliant indeed, you remembered to check the anonymous posting box properly this time.

    2. Re:But not fully backwards compatible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you can't read.

      It says all games will run on the original PS4, but some games won't run on the NEW "PS4.5".

    3. Re:But not fully backwards compatible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of corse I cant reed. I am an alliterate mouth breething anonomous coward.

    4. Re:But not fully backwards compatible. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Looks like you can't think. "Support the high-end PS4" means to have a code path for it to enable better graphics, enhanced features, or whatnot. Games that do not "support the high-end PS4" will simply run on the Neo in the same way they do on an original PS4. The only exception I could think of would be if there's a title that has some bizarre licensing agreement that only allows it to be sold for the original PS4. Considering the past decade of having a digital platform, I doubt this would be the case. Even Nintendo has gotten this right after a few fuckups with the Wii and DSi. (Certain early titles were locked to that exact platform/system and couldn't be transferred. Thankfully, those systems were hacked and not tied into online accounts, so I didn't lose anything.)

  27. Maybe I won't be buying a PS4 by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

    Despite their godawful handling of my beloved Playstation Vita, I had been eyeing a PS4 so that I could play Final Fantasy XV this fall. I'm starting to think I shouldn't bother with a PS4 at all if they're trying to pull this cell phone upgrade every year or two bullshit.

    I already have a WiiU, and with the rumors flying around that Microsoft is also thinking about these shenanigans, the WiiU might be the only console I get this generation.

    1. Re:Maybe I won't be buying a PS4 by Guyle · · Score: 1

      Word is flying everywhere that FFXV will likely come to PC, and likely be bigger and better as well. I was also considering buying a PS4 for the same reason, but I'm definitely going to wait for the PC version. Even if it takes awhile it'll be worth it.

    2. Re:Maybe I won't be buying a PS4 by sexconker · · Score: 1

      If the Neo releases this Fall, that's a full 3 years after the original. Hardly on par with cell phones. And it likely will cost less than a new high-end cell phone.

      The recent node shrink and AMD's new architectures are likely the impetus behind this revision. We've been waiting for anode shrink for a long time, and it's bringing massive benefits. I wouldn't expect this to become a pattern, but if Sony/MS try to force it, future revisions won't be anywhere as significant as this one looks to be.

    3. Re:Maybe I won't be buying a PS4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, probably, they've been going through all their Final Fantasy catalog and making PC ports.

      Problem: All their PC ports have been complete trash. They have never made a good PC port. Even their Final Fantasy MMOs manage to be trash on PCs, demanding you hook up a controller to make them playable. On top of being trash in general - their latest MMO managed to review worse than their original!

      My favorite example of Square Enix not getting PC ports is the FFXIII PC port. Pressing Esc exits the game. With no prompt. First thing I did when trying to play the PC port was enter a menu I wanted to back out of and then wound up quitting the game instead.

    4. Re:Maybe I won't be buying a PS4 by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Um, what? Are you saying FFXIV *requires* a controller? Why would you say that when Twitch is full of streamers playing KBM? Heck, the PS4 version supports KBM and, aside from the crappy mouse DPI support it's quite good!

      FFXI also supports KBM on PC but in a much more limited fashion.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    5. Re:Maybe I won't be buying a PS4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's designed to be played on the PS3, which means that the UI is designed around the PS3 controller. Which means you might as well need a controller to play.

      Which is weird because I don't remember if they ever actually released the PS3 version but from what I saw of the original game they probably should have just killed it and let it rot. Unfortunately Square Enix doesn't understand the "sunk cost" fallacy as FFXIII, XIII-2, XIII-3, and based on trailers, XV all also demonstrate.

  28. Dual-mode and exclusive games for Game Boy Color by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd compare it to a Game Boy Color (GBC), whose games fell into two categories:

    Dual-mode games These run on pre-GBC systems (the original Game Boy, Super Game Boy, and Game Boy Pocket) but have additional features on GBC. The cartridge has the original mold shape with an "innie" grip, and most are black (as opposed to gray for original Game Boy games). All dual-mode games have severe motion blur on the original Game Boy (but not on SGB, Pocket, or GBC). Some dual-mode games had slowdown on pre-GBC systems for any of three reasons: a slower processor (4.2 MHz vs. 8.4 MHz for GBC), lack of VRAM DMA, and intentionally reduced frame rate to accommodate the original Game Boy's severe motion blur. Early on, most GBC games were dual mode because of the massive installed base of pre-GBC systems. Exclusive games These run only on GBC. They display an error message if used with pre-GBC systems. The cartridge has a new mold with an "outie" grip, and most are transparent. Starting a couple years after the GBC's release, most games were exclusive.

    Likewise, dual-mode games for Neo may slow down or have reduced graphical complexity when run on an original PlayStation 4. And starting a couple years after the Neo's release, SCE may end up reversing its stance and allowing Neo-only games.

  29. Too bad, sucks to be you by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 1

    If you haven't done your research prior to making the purchase, you only have yourself to blame. This news has been in the rumor mill for a while now. I've decided that I'll buy the PS4 once GT7 releases, PS4K notwithstanding.

    Moreover, if you always sit and wait to buy the next big thing, you'll be waiting forever and never buy anything.

  30. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by tepples · · Score: 1

    PCs also have exclusive titles. There are plenty of games on Steam that don't appear in PlayStation Store. Mods are PC-exclusive as well; without mods, there'd be no Team Fortress and Counter-Strike. The question then becomes which platform has the exclusives most appealing to you (especially if they're Nintendo's), as well as whether games are intentionally crippled on one platform (such as removal of split-screen only on the PC version).

  31. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

    Is it really that bad is a new version comes out every three years, but each model still supports all of the older games and gets new games going forward for 6-8 years?

    You must have forgotten what site you were one. Sony or Microsoft could give away bars of gold and someone on /. would complain that they were too heavy and strained their back.

  32. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by tepples · · Score: 1

    Just keep playing games on your iPad.

    A touch screen like that of the iPad is not the ideal input method for all game genres. It's good for the same kinds of games that can be played with a mouse: point-and-click, endless runners, and certain kinds of shoot-em-up that use the touch screen like a trackpad. But something with a keyboard or gamepad works better for, say, platformers. For this you may want a PlayStation 4 or a PlayStation Vita.

  33. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by tepples · · Score: 1

    PC gaming is cheaper. Online multiplayer is without monthly fees.

    Which platform is cheaper for offline multiplayer? Especially if you have kids, it may be a choice of one console, a few controllers, and one copy of each game, or two to four gaming PCs and copies of each game.

  34. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 years ago the top of the line card was the Nvidia 7950 GX2. It is the equivalent of an integrated GPU in the AMD A10. It is able to run games at low/med settings.

    Not bad, but definitely not near-max settings.

  35. This is just AMD by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Giving Sony better chips that can be over clocked. It makes perfect sense for Sony to sell these at a premium. I'd be mad, but given that most modern games couldn't give a toss about frame rates above 24fps I don't see the problem. Plus if you're one of those folks who don't care you're about to see an abundance of cheap used PS4s.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is just AMD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Overclocking means running a chip at a speed faster than the manufacturer-listed default speed.

      These arent the same chips with improved cooling and voltage adjustments to make em run faster than AMD's advertised speed.

      Theyre new chips, based on a significantly smaller manufacturing process, and a new architecture, that perform all the same functions of the original PS4, but much faster.

      In order to not fragment the userbase and ensure compatibility across both the PS4 and PS4k, developers will develop the game for PS4 specs, then add eye candy on top of that for the PS4k version (probably in the form of a downloadable update). Lots of low hanging fruit, too. Increase the resolution, increase AF and AA, use higher resolution textures (assuming VRAM is increased too)... some devs will likely go after non-low hanging fruit too, like increased geometry and additional rendering techniques.

      All in all, the PS4k will be the "premium" version, offering increased eye candy and FPS rates (though not necessarily both, depending on the dev), but you'll be playing the same games (unless they go full retard).

  36. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a head's up: your grasp on the world, and your morality, are both as crappy as your sense of humor and ability to detect humor.

    You really should rethink your life.

  37. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That mean "run the games from 10 years ago at their max settings, using a current cheap PC".

  38. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plenty of local multiplayer games for PC now.

  39. Re:Dual-mode and exclusive games for Game Boy Colo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Honestly, this has been a PR shitshow.

    They should have simply said "we've started working on Playstation 5, it's still a ways out there so we won't be showing it at E3 this year, but we're going to promise you right now that it will be backwards compatible with all PS4 games."

    Sure, having a short PS4 life cycle will be a shitshow of its own, but at least it'll be a shitshow with an end in sight and the promise of compatibility should prevent a revolt from developers with games in the pipeline. Having PS4 and PS4 "plus" will be an unending shitshow, pissing off players and developers alike.

  40. Polishing a turd by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    In the end, same shitty game play, same 2-3 hours of a game 'til you're done with it and most games simply counting up a number in their name without changing anything but sticking another gimmick in it.

    Seriously, what's the point? I've had more fun with indie games in the past year than with AAA titles.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  41. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    run the games from 10 years ago at their max settings, using a current cheap PC

    Crysis is almost 9 years old now.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  42. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Simplicity and easy with consoles? That's a thing of the past.

    Yeah, I'm old, I remember the times when you stuffed a cartridge into that console, turned it on, picked up the controller, played 'til your brain turned to mush, then turned it off and went to bed.

    Today it's more like... turning on the console, trying to find the menu for "I wanna play a game" between the thousands of blinking icons that want you to "socialize", navigating there with the motion-sensitive (read: wave like an idiot) input system du jour, slipping the disc in, waiting half an hour for the copy protection to recognize it, having to download an update for the console, waiting for it to download, waiting for it to install, reading the damn disc again, the game realizing that there is an update for it, waiting again for the game update to download, waiting for the install (oh, I forgot: Turning the damn thing off and on between every single fucking update and going through the 8 ballet positions to navigate back to "lemme finally play the fucking game") and then finally, FINALLY, you can ... go to bed 'cause it's midnight.

    In all seriousness, "ease to use" when it comes to gaming is today PC gaming. Turn on the computer, 2 seconds later, thanks to SSD, it's there, click Steam, click favorite game, play 'til brain rots.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  43. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted, there are issues with consoles, but one thing is that they are definitely not frame locked at 30FPS. There are definitely games that run at 60FPS on PS4 and XBone.

  44. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 2

    They'll still produce games for the original PS4 because that's what their user-base owns. No one wants to trash their sales by narrowing compatibility to a console that most Sony gamers won't own. The only people who will buy this will be PSVR users and people with 4K TVs. This will be a fraction of the PS4 user-base.

  45. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

    If you're not broke, it means getting any console (or PC) that has exclusives that appeal to you - or that the friends you want to game with have, not just the one with the most exclusives. Gaming isn't just for kids who have to beg their parents to buy a console anymore. I expect that plenty of people have a nice gaming PC, an Xbox One, and a PS4.

  46. Moved to Steam on Linux After the PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That way I can use my Nvidia card for both gaming and machine learning. If you had an 'Other OS' option on the PS4 maybe you could do something like that .... Just a thought.

  47. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    Its not gaming in 4k. Only video and menu output. Games are still going to be 1080p.

  48. Polishing a turd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with pollishing a turd is, well - you can't. All y'all end up doing is smearing everything in shit. Welcome to the era of PowerPoint-as-a-game-mechanic.

  49. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    Most running some kind of variable resolution.

  50. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    Its not 4k gaming, though. Think about what that requires for PC... There is no way they could get a console at a reasonable price that could do that.

  51. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points for this.

  52. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    I was thinking PS4 Neo might be more targeted towards the Japanese market which has been lackluster this generation. VR Anime.

  53. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    It's not just about graphics, it's about memory and processing power too, and what developer is going to limit their games to the specs of a ps3 when a ps4 is around? None. So why on earth would they produce games for the ps4 when the 4k edition is going to be the dev kit they are building on. your statement only makes sense if you know nothing about games and game design. A kickass idea, with great gameplay, is still a steaming pile of shit at 15 FPS with long load times, and that's exactly what ps4 owners can expect once the NEO dev kits are shipped, shitty half assed ports with lower res textures and absolutely NO testing. Consoles aren't PCs, you can not have 2 consoles from the same developer last, you will always see the better performing device win out.

    Why? Because millions of their users will have the 1080P console. Would you produce a game that only works on the 4k for a limited number of people or for both? Just like PS4 games are released on the PS3. When you turn down the resolution that extra power won't be necessary so it should be easy to port it to the PS4.

  54. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just go back to sucking junkies' dicks, you fucking cuntard?

    Cause all the junkies took their business to your mother after they found how how cheap she was.

  55. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

    Its not 4k gaming, though. Think about what that requires for PC... There is no way they could get a console at a reasonable price that could do that.

    No, but you could double the price of a PS4 easily make it work. They said it would be more expensive so don't expect it to only be a $100 or $200 price hike.

  56. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I think that is the whole point here. Suppose Sony sells a 4k for 600$ and continues to sell and support the HD version... the impact on game developers is really small and not a bad deal for the HD users who more likely than not don't have a 4k TV.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  57. This will be like the Amiga vs Atari ST... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many crappy games came out on the Amiga after being converted from the Atari ST, or were 'dumbed down' on the Amiga because the crappy Atari ST couldn't keep up with it. I remember this very well during the Amiga days. (This was mainly in the U.K. game market, I think, the U.S. game market had a lot more Amiga only games which were way better than anything the crappy Atari ST could cope with.)

  58. FPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd pay a premium to get a PS4 that could play Destiny at a steady 60fps at 1080p with some form of AA. The current 30fps lock gives me a headache, and the lack of AA makes the game look much worse than it should since it actually has decent textures.

  59. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    It would be closer to $1000. If not more. For 30 FPS 4k gaming, you need a 980 TI (or possibly a 1070 depending on how it actually benchmarks). Add in a better CPU to be able to handle a GPU that is that powerful, and you already hit double the price without factoring in any other parts. Then you would have to consider how much heat a box like that is generating. So no, its not 4k gaming at even double the PS4 price.

  60. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    From what I read, its really only 4k for video and the menu systems anyways. The console is supposed to hit 1080p/60FPS on demanding games which is a monstrous improvement over the current gen consoles. Its really not a bad buy, but the 4k claim is very misrepresented.

  61. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    PC gaming = requires to maintain Windows, anti-virus crap, security updates otherwise your computer gets owned by hackers and starts sending spam or become part of a botnet, etc.

  62. Market penetrations means original will win. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the software will be written for the original ps4 because there are millions of them in homes already. People who get the 4k one are going to be playing stuff made for the original all the time.

  63. Sony can't manage and fix user accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't buy anything from Sony.

    I just did buy a PS4 for my son for his birthday, only to discover someone had mistakingly used my gmail account to create their PSN account. I was told it would take 2-3 days to fix this. The next day I was able to create an account using my gmail address. All was good...for a week. Then my son logged back in only to discover our account had been banned because of the email mixup. Sony was unable to resolve the issue without me using a different email address (I could have, but why should I?).

    The PS4 went back to Best Buy and AmEx cancelled payment of the online games purchased. I won't buy anything from Sony again as they could not resolve a customer account issue that was caused on their end.

    [ they obviously didn't verify the email address 4 years ago and then couldn't fix the account now]

    XYZZY

  64. Low quality ports seem overstated by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    These aren't two radically different pieces of hardware like the PS3 and PS4, it mostly looks like a bump in graphics capabilities. It seems fairly plausible that games will run well on the PS4 in HD and on the new machine at 4K. I have a PS 4 and am not particularly worried about this. Maybe if the VR is better with this on or if I decide to get a 4KTV at some point it might be worth the upgrade. Otherwise I expect to be happy with my PS4 and expect a lot of people will still continue to buy the cheaper PS4 because they only have an HD TV which will keep the PS4 as the most common PS4 platform (and therefore the one game makers consider the primary target) for quite a while.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  65. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Shados · · Score: 1

    And by that you mean "reboot once a month when it asks you to". That's about it.

  66. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Shados · · Score: 1

    Yup. The irony is now I use a Steam link connected to my PC as "my console" and its easier to use with less bullshit than my PS4.

    Push the button on the controller, pick "resume playing", done. PS4's collecting dust (though there are a few...very few, but a few, exclusives I want to play)

  67. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PCs also have exclusive titles. There are plenty of games on Steam that don't appear in PlayStation Store. Mods are PC-exclusive as well; without mods, there'd be no Team Fortress and Counter-Strike. The question then becomes which platform has the exclusives most appealing to you (especially if they're Nintendo's), as well as whether games are intentionally crippled on one platform (such as removal of split-screen only on the PC version).

    If you have to keep telling people how awesome PCs are...

  68. Re: If incrimental upgrades are going to be the no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you two idiots don't understand why we fuckingdetest both of those companies, you need to do less posting and more reading.

  69. knowing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did Sony put out a statement saying they will never upgrade at after a certain amount of time? Boo-fucking-hoo

  70. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by donaldm · · Score: 1

    Its not 4k gaming, though. Think about what that requires for PC... There is no way they could get a console at a reasonable price that could do that.

    No, but you could double the price of a PS4 easily make it work. They said it would be more expensive so don't expect it to only be a $100 or $200 price hike.

    Say just for argument sake that the Neo will be able to play 4k games at 60 fps and the machine costs $1000. There definitely would be people who would buy such a machine, however, they would be in the minority because most PS4 owners would not see the value of paying two to four times the price of the PS4 which is good enough for their HDTV.

    Maybe if the console owner had a 4k TV they may be tempted but for most people who already have an HDTV why should they replace it when it already works and most TV content today is still 720p or less for most shows unless you pay for a subscription for services that will provide higher graphical content.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  71. Oh my son is going to be pi$$ed by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    He's already had to send his PS4 back for warrenty work. Now when you turn it on there's a good
    chance the fan will spin up and the PS4 shut down (cold system).

    I've never had a problem with any of the previous PS controllers they last forever. I bought a PS4
    controller to play with on his system, when I'm not there his son use(s/d) it. Not one month later
    the right joystick stuck to the left -if controlling a person you will just start spinning to the
    left.

    I'm not impressed at all with the PS4, going to stick with my supposedly coveted backward
    compatible PS3 (I bought a backward compatible PS3 from Game Stop for $120 as a replacement
    recently (in stock)).

  72. This is for VR I think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure this is meant mainly to support VR games. In VR the screen is very close to your eyes and a "bump" to 4K will make a difference. On a TV, less so. Just like you need an upgraded PC to support a good VR headset, Sony realized that they need to upgrade the HW to be able to supply immersive experiences.

  73. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Us gamers that hold on to these ancient concepts like physical buttons, lag-free displays, open platforms, community mods, homebrew software, etc. are in the minority. The vast majority of the public will keep playing games on their iPads while calling you a crazy nerd. Some things never change!

  74. Re:Dual-mode and exclusive games for Game Boy Colo by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

    Interesting bit of Gameboy history - thanks!

    Yesterday I picked up my kids' old GBA and rummaged through their stockpile of games, which inludes original GB stuff. I never noticed the innie vs. outie grips until you pointed them out. Another big differentiator is that the GBA (GBC?) carts are half-length, relative to the "big" GB carts.

  75. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

    Its not gaming in 4k. Only video and menu output. Games are still going to be 1080p.

    Where did you hear that?
    TFA said "4K resolution and richer graphics, according to the unit’s chief executive".

  76. Re:If incrimental upgrades are going to be the nor by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

    Build your own PC for the same price as a console with more power and greater functionality.

    More power and greater functionality is easy enough, but for the same price as a $350 PS4?
    It is difficult for individuals to compete with Sony's volume purchasing power. Even a low-end $100 PC motherboard is certainly more than Sony spends on their motherboard.

  77. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by Pubstar · · Score: 1
  78. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by Pubstar · · Score: 1

    Sorry for double post, but use your head. It still costs arou d $2000 for 4k gaming on a PC. What makes you think a $400 console could handle it?

  79. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

    Good link - thanks. Better info than TFA!

  80. Re:Awesome! Just give me games that I want to play by OffTheWallSoccer · · Score: 1

    Well, nobody thinks a $400 box will do 4K. Double that, at least.

  81. That's the very future by gabriellalustar · · Score: 0

    Games are the best invention of people in this world therefore in my mind nobody can ban them. Games are unbelievably perfect ‘medications’ for every of us, because exactly they enable to create our ‘ideal virtuality’ and give us the unforgettable dream! :) So dude, don’t worry and hope in the best! :) From my part I would like to advise you playstation network codes https://www.gameveo.com/playst... where I always buy my superb PlayStation games and get a large pleasure from my recreation together with my lovely friends. :) I’m sure that this choice will be fabulous for you, because at present we have lots of amazing ways how to solve any problem. I wish you a huge good luck and many positive emotions into your life! :)