Slashdot Mirror


Russian Government Hackers Penetrated DNC, Stole Opposition Research On Donald Trump (washingtonpost.com)

Russian government hackers penetrated Democratic National Committee's database and stole research on Donald Trump (could be paywalled; alternate source), according to a report on Washington Post. DNC officials and security experts say the hackers were able to read all e-mail and chats in the DNC system. Some of the hackers had been in the DNC system for a year, the report adds. They were expelled from the computer system this past weekend. Russian spies also targeted the computers of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and several GOP political action committees. From the report: The intrusions are an example of Russia's interest in the U.S. political system and its desire to understand the policies, strengths and weaknesses of a potential future president -- much as American spies gather similar information on foreign candidates and leaders. The depth of the penetration reflects the skill and determination of the United States' top cyber adversary as Russia goes after strategic targets, from the White House and State Department to political campaign organizations.

160 comments

  1. Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Also, the DNC are a bunch of clowns. They're not a government agency and have to buy their IT security and it sure sounds like they went with the lowest bidder.

    1. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      We know Hillary's email wasn't secure because it was a hacker that revealed the existence of her special little server to the world.

    2. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Incorrect. No one penetrates Hillary.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Funny

      No one wants to. Including Bill.

    4. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hillary has a long history of taking money from Russian investors and returning favors.
      What better way to fling mud and shit and not be held accountable.

      I'm not convinced this is, what it's being portrayed as.

    5. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Huma.

    6. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Future US of A, Hillary penetrates you.

    7. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Password: 123456

    8. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And that's why she doesn't have any Presidential Material in her.

    9. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      ...and she's probably already got the necessary personal equipment to do it.

  2. Unpossible! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Funny

    I heard the DNC used the same impenetrable firewall on their server than SecState Hillary used. Locked bathroom door and everything!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, the servers were wiped. Like, with a towel.

    2. Re:Unpossible! by mschaffer · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe someone forgot to lock the door when the server was cleaned with a rag or something.

    3. Re:Unpossible! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well, your comment was meant as a joke . . . but let's take a look at reality. Could someone penetrate Hilary's illegal server . . . .? Probably, yes.

      Could someone force the dweeb who set the server up into giving away all the credentials? Definitely, yes. You would be surprised what you can be talked into, when someone is holding a blowtorch to your balls.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Unpossible! by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could someone force the dweeb who set the server up into giving away all the credentials? Definitely, yes.

      I'll leave this here.

    5. Re:Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, someone could go through the trouble of physically abducting the server admin and torturing him, but it's just so much easier, faster, and cheaper to hack a mis-configured or unpatched server.

    6. Re:Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The summary clearly suggests that they used a paywall. The hackers only had to pay they dues to get trough.

    7. Re:Unpossible! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a honeypot work so much better? Just send over an attractive woman to throw herself at him.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re:Unpossible! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a honeypot work so much better? Just send over an attractive woman to throw herself at him.

      Is that you, Mr. Assange . .. . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    9. Re:Unpossible! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Could someone force the dweeb who set the server up into giving away all the credentials? Definitely, yes. You would be surprised what you can be talked into, when someone is holding a blowtorch to your balls.

      That would never work because the dweeb in a blowtorch-free zone

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:Unpossible! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      That would be a sexpot, not a honeypot.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    11. Re:Unpossible! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      According to Wikipedia (the ultimate authority that it is not), my usage is correct.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. Re:In Soviet Russia by OakDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    (insert Soviet Russia meme here)

    Opposition research trumps you?

  4. Donal Trump needs to build a by pteddy · · Score: 1

    firewall around his servers.

    1. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Sheldon_Cooper_1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      firewall around his servers.

      And make Mexico pay for it.

    2. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and make the Russians pay for it !

    3. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firewall around his servers.

      Why? The Russian government got what DNC has about Trump to be able to counter any arguments preemptively.
      It is pretty evident that Russia supports Trump. I have no idea why but any propaganda from Russia so far have been in Trumps favor.

    4. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      Trump is a big fan of Putin, that's why.
      Also, he's expressed admiration towards Kim Jong-Un.

      Kind of wacky how a guy who wants to be "the leader of the free world" loves him some authoritarian dictators....

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    5. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure you just got whooshed by GP's attempt at a joke.

    6. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firewall around his servers.

      Why? The Russian government got what DNC has about Trump to be able to counter any arguments preemptively.
      It is pretty evident that Russia supports Trump. I have no idea why but any propaganda from Russia so far have been in Trumps favor.

      Russia doesn't get a vote, they are not Americans. In fact if Russia want's Trump in the oval office so bad, we as Americans would be overturning our political process by putting Trump in the oval office. Therefore voting for Trump is a vote against America!

      Choke on that logic!

    7. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Says a Clinton supporter unironically.

    8. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah ha! I am just getting started.

      Europe doesn't get a vote, they are not Americans. In fact if Europe want's Clinton in the oval office so bad, we as Americans would be overturning our political process by putting Clinton in the oval office. Therefore voting for Clinton is a vote against America!

      Now who do we vote for.

    9. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Demagogues end up as authoritarian dictators... that's his goal.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    10. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by ichthus · · Score: 0

      ...Also, I heard he clubs baby seals and bludgeons kitty cats.

      --
      sig: sauer
    11. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the US and Russia recognize who their common enemy is? Islamic terrorism has become a serious problem for the West as well as Russia, so it's a far better thing for them to team up and annihilate hard line Islamic countries.
      Oh, did that offend the Muslims and their apologists? Good.

    12. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my defense it is very hard to tell with Trump supporters.

    13. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by DaHat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How well you identify the motivations of Obama, something many of us saw since well before he was elected to our highest office.

    14. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      You need to look up the definition of "dictator". When people called Shrub a dictator, it was just as wrong then, and I disagreed with it.

      Though I'll admit that a populist along the lines of a Trump type could certainly carry it out.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    15. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      ...Also, I heard he clubs baby seals and bludgeons kitty cats.

      Nonsense. He goes clubbing with baby seals.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    16. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      I thought he got some club pussy...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re: Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooooh you're so edgy.

    18. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Why? The Russian government got what DNC has about Trump to be able to counter any arguments preemptively.
      It is pretty evident that Russia supports Trump. I have no idea why but any propaganda from Russia so far have been in Trumps favor.

      No proof but it's not rocket-science to realise that

      1. Russia some pretty serious problems with Muslim Wahhabist Terrorists. Russia has a Muslim majority Counties on it's boarders (12,577 mi of boarders) Kazakhstan and a Muslim population in Azerbaijan, Other countries with significant Muslim population only one Country away include Turkey, Iran, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

      2. Under the Obama (as POTUS) - Clinton (as SoS) the Wahhabists which includes the House of Saud, have greatly increased their power and influence. Russia has significant oil-gas reserves and petro-exports are a significant portion of the Russian economy so the Saudis are a competitors as well.

      3. The Saudis have bragged about having financed 20% of Clinton's Campaign, in addition to contributions to The Clinton Foundation. This makes Hillary seem available to the highest bidder and Russia's pockets are very shallow right now.

      4. Deep down inside Trump is a negotiator even though He talks Iconoclast vs. Clinton who talks negotiator but deep down is an iconoclast; so Trump can be worked with, Clinton not so much.

      5. Personally I think Putin just plain hates Obama as a pussy-whipped piece of apologist shit and Clinton as a ball-busting Feminist Lesbian who doesn't know her place.

      The worse that can happen to Russia with Trump in office is they'll have to put their expansion on hold for 8 years and the best is the need for buffer countries on their boarders will greatly diminish due to the US breaking the back of the terrorists or becoming the sole lightning rod.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    19. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Which HE; Putin, Trump, Hillary or Michelle?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  5. suspected Russian government hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I am aware only the united states admits to cyber espionage.

    1. Re:suspected Russian government hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "admits"; you're a damned fool if you honestly believe that other countries don't engage in espionage.

      We'll wait while you look up "honestly"

    2. Re:suspected Russian government hackers by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      He didn't say other countries abstain, he said that they don't admit to it. It is like riding that fat girl or screwing a moped, lots of people do it but rarely do people admit to doing it.

  6. So they're going to release Hillary news when? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Russian spies also targeted the computers of [...] Hillary Clinton

    Certainly if there was incriminating evidence of something diabolical in her email server, the Russians would have found it, would they not have? Why would they wait to release it?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Tanktalus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't think they could imagine more useful purposes to put that information?

      Maybe they don't want Obama to know what they know. Maybe they want to wait for HRC to get into the White House (everyone knew she'd be running this year) to blackmail her. The Russians have absolutely zero interest in American justice being served, why would they release it at all?

    2. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Blackmail ? It's amusing, with Clinton as a candidate. But if they have something REALLY damaging, imagine what PRESIDENT Clinton would do to keep it from the public eye.

      Of course, then she'd have the problem of Danegeld. . .

    3. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Russian spies also targeted the computers of [...] Hillary Clinton

      Certainly if there was incriminating evidence of something diabolical in her email server, the Russians would have found it, would they not have? Why would they wait to release it?

      The President has a lot more resources to pay off a blackmail than a former SoS.

    4. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When kiddies hack a system, they will brag about on Facebook. When professional spooks hack a system, you will probably never hear of it. If you have access to a great source of information, the best thing to do is to keep quiet about it. In that way, you can keep accessing the information.

      Depending on who you talk to, folks will say that Churchill knew that Germany was going to bomb Coventry. He decided not to order extra air defenses, because that would have alerted the Germans that their codes had been cracked.

      Toss curve balls, screw balls, and sliders at your enemy to confuse them, and get them chasing their own tails.

      In any case, this story stinks like a Cleveland Steamer: The Russians break into a DNC computer to steal info about Donald Trump? Give me a break! What did they steal about the Democratic Party?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Why would they wait to release it?

      What possible advantage to they gain by releasing any information they may have now? Better to save for leverage in some future negotiation about Syria, or the Ukraine, or any other hot topic.

    6. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      One comment on the radio is that Clinton had access to names of CIA operatives as part of her duties as head of the State Department, but those names were never identified within the email as an operative, so explicit searching would be difficult. By forwarding these emails to her personal server, and if her personal server was accessed as Guccifer claims it was, the hacker(s) would now have emails containing operative names.

      After the fact, the government is releasing emails as part of FOIA requests that are heavily redacted, and the reason on some documents is tagged as "B3 CIA PERS/ORG" indicating the redaction is of a name of a clandestine operative. A hacker with access to the original document can now easily go in and correlate the CIA tagged redacted document, and see the name of the individual who was redacted.

      At least 47 documents from her server (to date) have been tagged with this classification.

    7. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, those emails must be treasure troves detailing the inner workings of the super-delegate system, negotiations how to keep Bernie from advancing in the primaries, discussions on Hillary's email server / confidential exposure scandal, etc. Gotta spin it before people connect the dots to the bigger picture.

    8. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      | The President has a lot more resources to pay off a blackmail than a former SoS.

      Actually, not true in this case.

      The President has influence and authority, but authority which is mediated through legal processes, paper trail, and agencies with their own independent power. Maybe Obama could convince somehow the CIA to pay off some blackmail from their stash of unmarked bills used to pay overseas informants, but then, CIA would have tremendous blackmail potential over Obama.

      The Clintons have hundreds of millions of dollars as their personal, owned, wealth. Call up a banker somewhere, and it's done.

    9. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they want to wait for HRC to get into the White House (everyone knew she'd be running this year) to blackmail her.

      Why blackmail her when she can easily be bought?

    10. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some say FDR knew they were going to bomb Pearl Harbor because he needed a war.

    11. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By then it would be too late. DNC isn't gathering dirt on Trump to be nice, it is the battle chest they will use in the election. Anything that is unreleased when Trump becomes president is wasted to them. Russia have to use it before the real fight between Clinton and Trump starts.

    12. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But.. but.. Trump is the Kremlin's Choice! They stole this research to hand over to Trump so that his campaign will know what issues Clinton will use to attack him and construct counter strategies to minimize or eliminate the damages. Thats the Narrative they're building with all this Russian nonsense about kremlin troll armies for trump and staffer ties to the Kremlin operatives, etc.

    13. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      And even if using the official office to assist the blackmailers, the 25th amendment makes it pretty easy to remove their power given their incapacity to faithfully excite the office.

    14. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, thanks for posting. I didn't realize that story about Churchill allowing Coventry to be bombed was in dispute.

      You learn something every day, thanks again.

    15. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Britz · · Score: 1

      If you think you are a competing power to the US, there is nothing better that could happen to you than a Trump presidency (if you disagree and think a Trump presidency would be fine, just stop reading). China would most likely love to see that happen, because they want to extend their foothold in the South China Sea.

      I am not so sure about Russia. Deep down they must know they are a third rate country now, albeit with strategic nuclear weapons. Pressuring their neighbors only works, because those neighbors are so much weaker. On the world stage, they are only posturing. So I am not even sure they think they would benefit from a weakened US.

    16. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One comment on the radio is that Clinton had access to names of CIA operatives as part of her duties as head of the State Department, but those names were never identified within the email as an operative, so explicit searching would be difficult.

      Why would she have those names? The CIA isn't part of the State Department. If the CIA (or anyone else) is emailing operative's names, the security flaw isn't Clinton's choice of email server, but the emails in the first place.

    17. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The State Department might need to intercede on behalf of agents or cooperate with the CIA. It's kind of hard to do either of those things when you have no idea what is happening in the first place.

    18. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What makes you think money is the preferred payment? How about you sit on your hands while we help Assad or do this thing in Ukraine. Or make peace with Iran so we can sell defense armaments to them again.

      There are a lot of methods for payment that do not directly involve money.

    19. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Not correct, as this time the Russian government has a very powerful interest in exposing corruption in the US and forcing the US government to prosecute that corrupt because it completely disrupts that corrupt activity, which includes trying to fomet a cold war to increase arms sales, manipulation of diplomacy to disrupt normal trade and favour specific corporations and corruption of US intelligence services so they provide false data to promote war and arms sales.

      They will also release that information as suits them and so as to create maximum disruption. Right now the US government is blatantly, publicly not pursuing government corruption, preferring instead to focus in whistle blowers, so only US government corruption that targets other countries can be exposed, if those countries choose to act on it or just bend over and accept the US government intrusion. Extortion wont really work, unless it is first proved to be substantively effective by taking down a whole bunch of corrupt politicians and corporate executives first.

      The likely forecast, a series of explosive, well detailed documentaries (with evidence available for download) to be released one after another, to cause maximum embarrassment to the US government and force the US government reputation to be severely tarnished when they yet again failed to prosecute exposed government corruption (for profit war based on WMD lies and torture to fabricate confessions to justify the WMD lie, just the most glaring examples of extreme corruption within the US government not to forget the recording of the US state department picking the next leader of a foreign country in which they had staged a coup).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by trichard · · Score: 2

      Why would she have those names? The CIA isn't part of the State Department. If the CIA (or anyone else) is emailing operative's names, the security flaw isn't Clinton's choice of email server, but the emails in the first place.

      The CIA is part of the State department. It's the part authorized to do clandestine operations outside the borders of the US.

  7. Bernie kept his research air gapped by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    in the toaster oven

    And once all 2.3 million outstanding ballots are counted in California (yes, as of today), you'll realize how wise that was.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Bernie kept his research air gapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Air gapped? More like air Grand Canyoned.

      Sanders is the I still have a simple phone guy in the barber shop.

  8. Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. . by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

    . . . .they already have all they need on Clinton, from her email server. . . .

    The fact that they're looking for dirt on Trump, suggests that they think he might well be elected. . .

  9. Security review will clear DNC, it is obvious by Trachman · · Score: 0

    DNC server was allowed, and no laws were broken.

    There is no evidence Russians indeed hacked into the server.

    Any evidence that is available, can be easily falsified.

    And how exactly did they they penetrated? There were people working in DNC almost around the clock and no body, I repeat, nobody saw any of the attempts to penetrate.

    Also, those who claim inappropriate penetration, are of questionable character and should not be believed.

    1. Re:Security review will clear DNC, it is obvious by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      They had backup copies of the hard disks . . . but they crashed.

      There were backup copies, of the backups, but they have been recycled.

      And, last, but not least . . . "I'll take the fifth amendment and my $200,000 per year pension with me."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Security review will clear DNC, it is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You saved American media by posting this simple but important statement!

  10. Bernie was the first... by mschaffer · · Score: 2

    Bernie was the first to "compromise" data on DNC servers. Did we already forget just how bad some of the DNC data is protected?
    https://medium.com/@AmyKDacey/...

    1. Re:Bernie was the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because Bernie is a l33t hax0r.

      Guessing the password was 12345 took some mad skilz.

    2. Re:Bernie was the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, Nixon was before Bernie.

  11. Because monthly blackmail payments by waspleg · · Score: 1

    are worth more than lump sum hush money.

  12. Yawn, it's what spies do. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the US (tries to) bust into the Russian political stuff also.

  13. a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia has no sense of conquest right now. It is all the US/EU spies strong-arming corporations like Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, etc. All your shit is spyware and it's not Russian spyware.

    Think harder. You're really going to give credence to a Jewish Washington Post with loyalties to a country that lives under a force field. (Iron Dome).

    What next? Can you grasp facts at all? How about oh, I don't know, maybe there is no need to hack a country that is already infiltrated by foreigners - while letting foreign immigrants flood the country? The FBI has an unprecedented amount of moles. Literally anything important goes straight to China AND Russia. Immediately.

    Slashdot where comments matter and the stories are bullshit.

  14. Trump opposition research: by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quote Trump directly.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re: Trump opposition research: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure to excerpt so as to leave out context.

    2. Re: Trump opposition research: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure to excerpt so as to leave out context.

      Good style tip on "How to Write Articles Like a Washington Post Reporter"

    3. Re: Trump opposition research: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Trump is completely context free.

    4. Re: Trump opposition research: by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Trump is completely context free.

      but he speaks his mind

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    5. Re: Trump opposition research: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but he speaks his mind

      which has a 128-character limit

    6. Re: Trump opposition research: by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Trump is completely context free.

      but he speaks his mind

      Yeah, people have been noticing that. At first I thought it was just an anti-politically-correct spiel, the line between being Politically Correct and Pissing off the Pope that fine, and now I'm not so sure. I don't disagree with the meat of what he's saying, but he doesn't have to be so unnecessarily imflamatory and he needs to give himself room to escalate and de-escalate as conditions vary.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  15. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardly. DNC is not going to keep any dirt they have on Trump past the election, the intent is to use it before.
    The only reason the Russian would want it is to mount a counter against it.
    Why they would support Trump I don't know, perhaps they want to deal with him? A favor during the election to be returned after the election.

  16. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    The fact that they're looking for dirt on Trump, suggests that they think he might well be elected. . .

    It doesn't suggest that at all. It would be pretty stupid for Russia not to look into the major political contenders of their primary adversary regardless whether they might win or not.

  17. Russians want Hillary by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    The Russians look at national economic ascendancy like a zero sum game (that's why Russians are so poor).

    They think that if we get pushovers like Obama (who told Putin he was one reelection away from giving him everything Putin wanted) in office that the US will do worse and Russia will do better.

    Russia and the US could actually succeed together if they relaxed commercial barriers. Increased trade rewards value-adds at every stage and more people can compete to fulfill demand (i.e. more jobs).

    To me it makes no sense to punch a guy in the stomach and then think my life is going to be better since it is better relative to someone else. But that's how these guys think.

    But ... sigh ... Trump (like Putin, Obama, and Hillary) is an economic protectionist.

    1. Re:Russians want Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Folks seem to read the art of war, and not really get the whole point of it.... competition is *bad*---it causes waste on both sides.

      But without competition, there can be no losers, and without losers, there can be no winners, right???

  18. it wuz haxx0rz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welp, just gotta EXTRAORDINARILY RENDER them, so you can lock'em up. It's the law!

  19. Russians? by whitroth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, they had access for how long? A year? I don't suppose there's *any* chance that the open access that Bernie's folks looked at - one of the first reports I read, never repeated, was the guy in charge of the 4-person team had them look, to see if Hillary had gotten *their* info.

    And then the DNC "cleaned up"?

    I now believe *nothing* the DNC says about its computer systems, or security, since if they'd *actually* cleaned up... they would have caught the Russians *then*, not the beginning of May.

                        mark

    1. Re:Russians? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The Bernie-Hillary cross-contamination was supposedly a lack of robust separation of two groups of authorised users, where this is the penetration by two groups of unauthorised users to probably everything. If they had the security cranked up, only the long-term cadre would have been able to learn how to use, because the volunteers would be their long enough to train.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  20. Joke's On Them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After pouring through the data, all they found was a bunch of words. But they were really great. Really, the BEST words! And the BIGGEST words! And the other words in there about Hillary were really pretty pathetic. Very pathetic. It's sad, really.

  21. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God's chosen people who happen to be anti-Christian live under a force field??! What?!

    Bad day to be a Jew.

  22. Contents: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The stolen file reads: "Trump is an arrogant classless bigoted blowhard who often changes his position and rarely offers specifics. Thus, he's a lot like Putin."

    1. Re:Contents: by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      When he looks into his eyes, he sees somebody that he can work with.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Contents: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Didn't W do that, and get hypnotized?

    3. Re:Contents: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      W gets hypnotised just looking at a bagel.

    4. Re:Contents: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, that was a pretzel, and the pretzel won.

  23. Way to go Debbie! by cahuenga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Credit to the DNC and Big Media for spinning this so well. Putin only got got his hands on Trump research.... Nothing on Hillary.

    What a load.

    1. Re:Way to go Debbie! by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >> Putin only got got his hands on Trump research.... Nothing on Hillary.

      There were at least two foreign groups that owned the network. At least one grabbed the Trump material but there's also this rather shocking admission:
      "The intruders so thoroughly compromised the DNC’s system that they also were able to read all email and chat traffic, said DNC officials and the security experts."

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-government-hackers-penetrated-dnc-stole-opposition-research-on-trump/2016/06/14/cf006cb4-316e-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html

  24. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump might give up antagonizing the Russians by trying to get its neighbors to join NATO, and then putting missiles on its doorstep in order to neutralize it. Clinton, being the tool of neocons, will push even harder to subvert the governments of the countries bordering Russia, risking world war. The US didn't stand for it during the Cuban crisis (even though they triggered it by putting missiles in Turkey and Italy), the Russians won't stand for it now.

  25. DNC's research into Trump? by Orgasmatron · · Score: 4, Informative

    ZOMG! Now the Russians know that Trump is racist, sexist, homophobic and Islamophobic. He wants to throw grandma out of the hospital to die on the street, or off a cliff, depending on the topic. At night he hands out fully automatic, laser guided "Assault Guns" with extra-lethal plastic parts to inner city toddlers and mentally unstable Democrats. In his spare time, he is the leader of a secret society of racists known as "the Police" that meets daily to discuss new ways to murder and/or frame innocent black children on their way to church.

    Seriously guys, the DNC's "opposition research" is chiseled in stone, and not exactly secret. They just swap out the name at the top.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I supose you're one of those people that flatly refuse to acknowledge any of the tons of evindence in front of your face that Hilary is the leader of one of the biggest crime families in the US?

    2. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >that Hilary is the leader

      That you write that Hilary is the leader of anything much less "one of the biggest crime families in the US" tells me that you must be funnin'. Please tell me that you're having a bit of fun here..

    3. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      Might want to read my post again. I'm clearly in the "Hillary 4 Prison 2016" camp.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    4. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my sarcasm detector doesn't work too well before the 1st morning coffee :-)

    5. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No She's more of a Boss Hogg trying to be another and more successful DeWitt Clinton and establish a federal version of Tammany Hall.
      The biggest difference between Hillary and J.D. Hogg is with Hogg nobody got hurt, with the Clintons they drop like flies and Hillary was a Carpetbagger.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  26. Indict ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... everybody.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  27. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be pretty stupid for Russia not to look into the major political contenders of their primary adversary regardless whether they might win or not.

    It's pretty damned stupid that Russia thinks of the United States (or more accurately, NATO and the West) as their "primary adversary" when they have a near negative birthrate and 1.3 billion neighbors to the east that are far more likely to come looking for Lebensraum.

    I understand the historical reasons for Russia to fear the West -- multiple invasions in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries -- but it's 2016; are the people in Moscow really that stuck in the past? To look at the fat and happy citizens of the West and see an existential threat? I don't think the generation that demands "safe zones" from "microaggressions" is terribly likely to launch Operation Barbarossa II.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  28. I believe "Opposition Research" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on Donald Trump is what we used to call a "tape recorder."

  29. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, you confused me- are you spouting some wackadoodle Jewish conspiracy theory, some wackadoodle Russian conspiracy theory, some wackadoodle Chinese conspiracy theory, or are you going for the wackadoodle trifecta here?

  30. Good news! The DNC is worth penetrating! by mveloso · · Score: 2

    The silver lining is that the DNC may actually be worth penetrating! If the GRU thinks there may be something valuable in there then maybe the DNC actually does something of value.

    1. Re:Good news! The DNC is worth penetrating! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nature of the issues with Bernie and inappropriate access multiple times makes me believe it was probably just low hanging fruit as opposed to some concerted effort to be hacked via some zero day exploit. Sort of like when your mother forgets to wear a bra, we don't really care that much but of course we're going to look.

  31. Non story. /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did this get to be a Trump story? Or a story at all for that matter.

    You would think that the Russians would administer our political parties' servers a bit better maybe, but it isn't really their job.

  32. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by sundy58 · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Plus Hillary might launch a nuclear war if the money is right.

  33. The Russians are not all that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they have no love for muslims. In that vein we should be cooperative. Unlike us, they have zero issues with dropping bombs on muslim cities, something the US had the will to do in WWII but lost it during Vietnam. Now, the milquetoasts that run the country and military don't or won't kill. We use drones, which require more accuracy, better intelligence (which is rarely perfect). I'm for leveling the cities. Less people to fight later on, immediate gratification, instant intelligence on damage assessments, all around better. The West has grown weak. Islam is taking the long view. The are slowly but surely moving here and getting onto school boards, on police departments, positions of power where they don't belong. This is a Western nation with western Judeo-Christian values. Even if people are not Christian, they benefit from the J-C value system of life, freedom, you name it.

    Sadly, and stupidly, in the US we have this:

    John Brennan, current head of the CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia.

    Obama's top adviser, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live.

    Hillary Clinton's top adviser, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are still involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt!

    Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim.

    Homeland Security Adviser, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim.

    Obama adviser and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim.

    Obama's Islamic/Sharia advisor, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim.

    Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim.

    Rep Andre Carson, D-Ind, a Muslim , the first Muslim lawmaker on the House of Representatives and on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

    1. Re:The Russians are not all that bad by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Donald - log in for chrissakes.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:The Russians are not all that bad by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      lol

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  34. Good luck Russia! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    I think that Trump himself is still trying to figure out what his foreign policies will be!

    Please let the American people know if you figure anything out!

  35. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Die slow and very painfully, soon.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden

    If you can't see the actual network of subterfuge right now maybe you should Seppuku yourself with honor.

    Did you conspire to make up a word today called "wackadoodle"? No, you are just stupid enough to die in your ignorance.

  36. Nah, Those Jackasses at the DNC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They weren't hacked. Those volunteer idiots at the DNC handed it over willingly.

    1. Re:Nah, Those Jackasses at the DNC... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Useful idiots, Lenin called them.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  37. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not against Russia, but certainly against Iran.

  38. Just that one thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only stole just the Trump opposition information. Nothing else right? lmao

  39. Surprised by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Surprised that the Chinese didn't lock down their DNC espionage better in order to keep the drunk Russians out.

  40. Sometimes looking in the wrong places... by DriveDog · · Score: 2

    A lot of noise is made about foreigners buying influence (over US legislators and executives), but we don't hear much about blackmail. Which might mean that it's been very successful. If Wikileaks can find stuff in emails to get people in trouble, certainly the Russians can find stuff in emails with which to blackmail. The beauty of blackmail is that it's the gift that keeps on giving. The more you succumb to it, the more grip the blackmailer has over you.

  41. Of course the DNC does something of value! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It screws over Bernie Sanders!

  42. Just propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is no evidence, just wild accusations used to fuel the hatred for Russia (and China, and to some extent India). It's well-known, thanks to Snowden, that the U.S conducts its own attacks on foreign governments and industries from compromised computers all over the world, and if Russia or China were doing the same thing, you could never tie them directly to any breach. These accusations are propaganda, period.

  43. Don't believe the SPIN by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hackers broke into the DNC to steal information about their opponent and not their candidate. Now thats some straight up spin. They stole everything that was there but I can guarantee you that they were far more interested in the internal info they had on the DNC candidate. BTW just because the logged-ip addressed point to Russian ip-blocks it doesn't mean that this was done by direction of the Russian government or even that the attack originated in Russia. Using compromised machines under the hackers controll as proxy servers to carry attacks on a 3d party is standard practice. Using machines in countries that are generally considered rivals and are unlikely to cooperate with U.S authorities in an investigation, makes a heck-of-a-lot of sense

    1. Re:Don't believe the SPIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >BTW just because the logged-ip addressed point to Russian ip-blocks it doesn't mean that this was done by direction of the Russian government or even that the attack originated in Russia.

      This is what I've never understood about these hacking stories involving Russia or China. Supposedly, these countries have uber military hackers virtually rape hacking our poor, defenseless, US computers and yet they haven't learned to cover their tracks by launching their attacks from systems NOT located in their countries? The fact is Russian and Chinese systems are notoriously vulnerable to attacks and the likelyhood is that some other state actor, criminal org, or US based hackers are using their hacked systems to launch attacks. It makes no sense for Russia or China to launch attacks from systems that can be traced back to their countries. None.

    2. Re:Don't believe the SPIN by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 1

      >BTW just because the logged-ip addressed point to Russian ip-blocks it doesn't mean that this was done by direction of the Russian government or even that the attack originated in Russia. In case anyone was curious, the Former Soviet Union (and Russia in particular) tends to have the highest concentration of open proxy servers.

    3. Re:Don't believe the SPIN by axewolf · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to talk sense to the animals.
      The headline is all they need to know.

  44. Enough With The Snarky Comments Already by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do a little reading and you'll find that the Chinese are busy stealing all of our technology and preparing themselves to take out our infrastructure (power-grid, banking, etc.). On the other front the Russians are actively engaging in political sabotage via all means from hordes of message forum trolls to active hacking. Don't think that the upcoming "Brexit" vote isn't being watched with great interest, and actively promoted by the Russians. I remember a few years ago Putin predicting that we'd be in a civil war here in the states by about now. Don't think for a moment that he doesn't have a bunch of shills working the interwebs for Russian interests in fomenting unrest and discontent right here and now.

    1. Re:Enough With The Snarky Comments Already by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Putin shills instigating civil war in the US? Trump praising Putin and Putin all but endorsing Trump? Was Trump sent by the Russians to tear our country in two?

      (Hey, it's not any crazier than the other conspiracy theories that Trump touts.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Enough With The Snarky Comments Already by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      It isn't crazy at all. Read some better European newspapers. The EU types are right now trying to figure out how to handle the torrent of invective and propaganda coming out of a few troll factories operating out of Russia. They have hard documentation on this.

  45. Re:Non story. /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neocons have been strongly implying that Trump is being supported by Putin.

    See Is Trump a Sleeper Agent for Moscow?
    Ok, maybe actually doing more than implying :0

    The neocons have also claimed that Russia has a "troll army" working to support Trump across social media, particularly Twitter and Facebook:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ch0MkR2VEAAfOYP.jpg
    "David Frum @davidfrum May 6
    Surprising number of AmericaFirst Trump trolls don't seem to speak English as their first language"

    "Jeet Heer @HeerJeet May 6
    @davidfrum I honestly think some of them are part of Putin's troll army."

    This latest story is a another piece of the narrative that the neocons have been constructing about Russia influencing the US election in favor of Trump. The next piece will probably involve finding this "stolen" so-called DNC opposition research on a Trump's staffer computer or campaign server thus proving that Putin is aiding Trump to defeat Clinton. Watch for it.

  46. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > maybe you should Seppuku yourself

    Dude, let's keep it PG-13 here!

  47. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

    The fact that they're looking for dirt on Trump, suggests that they think he might well be elected. . .

    Well duh, he is the presumptive candidate of one of the two dominant US political parties. His chances of becoming president of the US for the next 4 years are currently better than every other human on the planet except one (by some variable margin). ....uhhboy....

  48. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your stupidity is painful to observe, even from a distance. And of course you didn't even answer the question- was the sentence too long for your attention span?

    Go back to your Trump rally loser (is that redundant?).

    If you are unfamiliar with the word "wackadoodle" maybe you should ask those who know you best, they'll probably just point back at you. Or just let Google be your friend (probably your only one).

  49. Re:Non story. /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > How did this get to be a Trump story?

    Everything is a Trump story. Obama gave a speech earlier where he said nothing about Trump, so CNN was like "...but he *meant* Trump". Trump is now conspicuous when absent in any story.

    I'm amused that the Russians stole the Democrat's stop_america_from_being_great_again.docx or whatever, but the fact that the story has to put Trump in the headline to spice up a story about foreign spies hacking one of the two major parties in order to get people to click on it tells you all you need to know about how the election will go down.

  50. You Forgot One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  51. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by mbkennel · · Score: 2

    | Why they would support Trump I don't know,

    It's literally part of the old KGB playbook. Because POTUS Trump would cause friction between US and European NATO allies. Hurting US/Europe alliances is considered a benefit to Russia.

  52. Maybe someone should take one for the team. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might make her less mean, spiteful, sociopathic, and corrupt.

    captcha was 'grossed'

  53. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Trump is extremely popular in Russia. Everyone is rooting for him over there- both the government and ordinary citizens. They were probably gathering the stuff to hand over to him.

    The real puzzle here is, why does Hillary or anyone else need to do "opposition research" on Trump? He does it for you every time he opens his mouth.

  54. oh, grow a brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump is not a Putin supporter... he just said that Putin is a strong leader. You can say that a guy is a strong leader and even say that his people seem to support him without automatically endorsing everything about the guy.
    I know Trump's political opponents (both dems and reps) are a bit desperate but this whole "Trump supports Putin" talkingpoint is just silly and blatantly dishonest.
    Besides, that attack on Trump was tried (and failed) in primary system.

  55. heh ... help for whom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Putin want to try to help Hilary or Trump?

    He knows what Hilary knows about Trump. That means he can look at her actions vs. information and evaluate them.

    From this I infer that he plans to help her, and use this to base his negotiations and strategic actions. Her actions in the next 6 months will inform his actions in the next 2-4 years.

    I wonder if this qualifies as a national security issue.

    He thinks her Intel is informative.
    He can look both at the Intel and the candidate strategies to generate a cookbook of her approaches and detect both themes and departures from those themes.

    He can also share some of it with allies to influence negotiations.

    Interesting game.

  56. Simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we should let all politicians have their own personal email server.

    At this point, what difference does it make?

  57. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Russia doesn't fear the West. Putin just wants somebody to be the bad guy - and we do that splendidly. We're much less likely than Islam (in it's various incantations) to come back and bite. It also gives him an excuse to work on the military - something that's good for his hold on power and for his cronies pocket books.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  58. Research by rainbird · · Score: 2

    I noticed they collected "Research" on Donald Trump and not intelligence.

  59. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. We don't want the little one to start whacking his doodle.

  60. Trump Blackmailed? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Something posters here seem to be missing. This didn't happen last week, it happened almost a year ago. So whatever they wanted to do with the dirt they found out about Trump, they've had it for over a year.

    Trump has been making oddly fanboyish statements about Putin for the last year. It *could* be that he honestly is a fan of that one mid-Eurasian dictator out of all the others like him out there. But the timing opens up other interesting possibilities.

    Trump has also conspicuously refused to release his tax returns, unlike just about every major party nominee since tax returns started.

    It would certainly be interesting if a foreign intelligence service managed to get themselves a major party nominee in their pocket. If I was on the Secret Service detail for Clinton, I'd start screening for polonium in addition to guns.

  61. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moisten when you talk so tough. Maybe a spanking later? Please daddy!

  62. Re:a spy story of false sincerity oh no shit karen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please. You moisten whenever you hear the word "Trump". It must be very awkward playing card games with you.

  63. Horrifying! by newslash.formatblows · · Score: 1

    What if the Russians find out he's a racist, uninformed narcissistic orange bloviating dickhead? We need to protect that information!

  64. Watergate 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lifetime ago Nixon did this and was impeached. The "average citizen" was outraged.

    Today it is done, by a foreign government no less, and there is no outrage.

    This clearly clearly shows that the fundamental character of the nation has undergone a radical change.

  65. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by budgenator · · Score: 1

    There is Nothing Hillary can say or do will sway Trump Supporters period. There is Nothing Trump can say or do will sway Clinton Supporters period. I don't think either can win with just their supporters so the fight is going to be over the undecided and keeping the "Lean toward one due to the lesser of two evils" leaning the right way and to lesser getting the Bernistas to fall in line.
    Getting the leaning towards and undecided is the sweet spot, that's why in every election the true dyed-in-the-wool supporters feel betrayed.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds