Slashdot Mirror


Russian Government Hackers Penetrated DNC, Stole Opposition Research On Donald Trump (washingtonpost.com)

Russian government hackers penetrated Democratic National Committee's database and stole research on Donald Trump (could be paywalled; alternate source), according to a report on Washington Post. DNC officials and security experts say the hackers were able to read all e-mail and chats in the DNC system. Some of the hackers had been in the DNC system for a year, the report adds. They were expelled from the computer system this past weekend. Russian spies also targeted the computers of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton and several GOP political action committees. From the report: The intrusions are an example of Russia's interest in the U.S. political system and its desire to understand the policies, strengths and weaknesses of a potential future president -- much as American spies gather similar information on foreign candidates and leaders. The depth of the penetration reflects the skill and determination of the United States' top cyber adversary as Russia goes after strategic targets, from the White House and State Department to political campaign organizations.

93 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Also, the DNC are a bunch of clowns. They're not a government agency and have to buy their IT security and it sure sounds like they went with the lowest bidder.

    1. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Incorrect. No one penetrates Hillary.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by JustNiz · · Score: 3, Funny

      No one wants to. Including Bill.

    3. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And that's why she doesn't have any Presidential Material in her.

    4. Re:Show of hands, was Hillary's email secure? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      ...and she's probably already got the necessary personal equipment to do it.

  2. Unpossible! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Funny

    I heard the DNC used the same impenetrable firewall on their server than SecState Hillary used. Locked bathroom door and everything!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Unpossible! by mschaffer · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe someone forgot to lock the door when the server was cleaned with a rag or something.

    2. Re:Unpossible! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well, your comment was meant as a joke . . . but let's take a look at reality. Could someone penetrate Hilary's illegal server . . . .? Probably, yes.

      Could someone force the dweeb who set the server up into giving away all the credentials? Definitely, yes. You would be surprised what you can be talked into, when someone is holding a blowtorch to your balls.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Unpossible! by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could someone force the dweeb who set the server up into giving away all the credentials? Definitely, yes.

      I'll leave this here.

    4. Re:Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, someone could go through the trouble of physically abducting the server admin and torturing him, but it's just so much easier, faster, and cheaper to hack a mis-configured or unpatched server.

    5. Re:Unpossible! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a honeypot work so much better? Just send over an attractive woman to throw herself at him.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re:Unpossible! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a honeypot work so much better? Just send over an attractive woman to throw herself at him.

      Is that you, Mr. Assange . .. . ?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    7. Re:Unpossible! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Could someone force the dweeb who set the server up into giving away all the credentials? Definitely, yes. You would be surprised what you can be talked into, when someone is holding a blowtorch to your balls.

      That would never work because the dweeb in a blowtorch-free zone

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:Unpossible! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      That would be a sexpot, not a honeypot.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    9. Re:Unpossible! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      According to Wikipedia (the ultimate authority that it is not), my usage is correct.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. Re:In Soviet Russia by OakDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    (insert Soviet Russia meme here)

    Opposition research trumps you?

  4. Donal Trump needs to build a by pteddy · · Score: 1

    firewall around his servers.

    1. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Sheldon_Cooper_1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      firewall around his servers.

      And make Mexico pay for it.

    2. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Kierthos · · Score: 2

      Trump is a big fan of Putin, that's why.
      Also, he's expressed admiration towards Kim Jong-Un.

      Kind of wacky how a guy who wants to be "the leader of the free world" loves him some authoritarian dictators....

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Says a Clinton supporter unironically.

    4. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Demagogues end up as authoritarian dictators... that's his goal.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by DaHat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How well you identify the motivations of Obama, something many of us saw since well before he was elected to our highest office.

    6. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      You need to look up the definition of "dictator". When people called Shrub a dictator, it was just as wrong then, and I disagreed with it.

      Though I'll admit that a populist along the lines of a Trump type could certainly carry it out.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    7. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by sysrammer · · Score: 2

      ...Also, I heard he clubs baby seals and bludgeons kitty cats.

      Nonsense. He goes clubbing with baby seals.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    8. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      I thought he got some club pussy...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    9. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Why? The Russian government got what DNC has about Trump to be able to counter any arguments preemptively.
      It is pretty evident that Russia supports Trump. I have no idea why but any propaganda from Russia so far have been in Trumps favor.

      No proof but it's not rocket-science to realise that

      1. Russia some pretty serious problems with Muslim Wahhabist Terrorists. Russia has a Muslim majority Counties on it's boarders (12,577 mi of boarders) Kazakhstan and a Muslim population in Azerbaijan, Other countries with significant Muslim population only one Country away include Turkey, Iran, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

      2. Under the Obama (as POTUS) - Clinton (as SoS) the Wahhabists which includes the House of Saud, have greatly increased their power and influence. Russia has significant oil-gas reserves and petro-exports are a significant portion of the Russian economy so the Saudis are a competitors as well.

      3. The Saudis have bragged about having financed 20% of Clinton's Campaign, in addition to contributions to The Clinton Foundation. This makes Hillary seem available to the highest bidder and Russia's pockets are very shallow right now.

      4. Deep down inside Trump is a negotiator even though He talks Iconoclast vs. Clinton who talks negotiator but deep down is an iconoclast; so Trump can be worked with, Clinton not so much.

      5. Personally I think Putin just plain hates Obama as a pussy-whipped piece of apologist shit and Clinton as a ball-busting Feminist Lesbian who doesn't know her place.

      The worse that can happen to Russia with Trump in office is they'll have to put their expansion on hold for 8 years and the best is the need for buffer countries on their boarders will greatly diminish due to the US breaking the back of the terrorists or becoming the sole lightning rod.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    10. Re:Donal Trump needs to build a by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Which HE; Putin, Trump, Hillary or Michelle?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  5. suspected Russian government hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I am aware only the united states admits to cyber espionage.

    1. Re:suspected Russian government hackers by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      He didn't say other countries abstain, he said that they don't admit to it. It is like riding that fat girl or screwing a moped, lots of people do it but rarely do people admit to doing it.

  6. So they're going to release Hillary news when? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Russian spies also targeted the computers of [...] Hillary Clinton

    Certainly if there was incriminating evidence of something diabolical in her email server, the Russians would have found it, would they not have? Why would they wait to release it?

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Tanktalus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't think they could imagine more useful purposes to put that information?

      Maybe they don't want Obama to know what they know. Maybe they want to wait for HRC to get into the White House (everyone knew she'd be running this year) to blackmail her. The Russians have absolutely zero interest in American justice being served, why would they release it at all?

    2. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Blackmail ? It's amusing, with Clinton as a candidate. But if they have something REALLY damaging, imagine what PRESIDENT Clinton would do to keep it from the public eye.

      Of course, then she'd have the problem of Danegeld. . .

    3. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Russian spies also targeted the computers of [...] Hillary Clinton

      Certainly if there was incriminating evidence of something diabolical in her email server, the Russians would have found it, would they not have? Why would they wait to release it?

      The President has a lot more resources to pay off a blackmail than a former SoS.

    4. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When kiddies hack a system, they will brag about on Facebook. When professional spooks hack a system, you will probably never hear of it. If you have access to a great source of information, the best thing to do is to keep quiet about it. In that way, you can keep accessing the information.

      Depending on who you talk to, folks will say that Churchill knew that Germany was going to bomb Coventry. He decided not to order extra air defenses, because that would have alerted the Germans that their codes had been cracked.

      Toss curve balls, screw balls, and sliders at your enemy to confuse them, and get them chasing their own tails.

      In any case, this story stinks like a Cleveland Steamer: The Russians break into a DNC computer to steal info about Donald Trump? Give me a break! What did they steal about the Democratic Party?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      One comment on the radio is that Clinton had access to names of CIA operatives as part of her duties as head of the State Department, but those names were never identified within the email as an operative, so explicit searching would be difficult. By forwarding these emails to her personal server, and if her personal server was accessed as Guccifer claims it was, the hacker(s) would now have emails containing operative names.

      After the fact, the government is releasing emails as part of FOIA requests that are heavily redacted, and the reason on some documents is tagged as "B3 CIA PERS/ORG" indicating the redaction is of a name of a clandestine operative. A hacker with access to the original document can now easily go in and correlate the CIA tagged redacted document, and see the name of the individual who was redacted.

      At least 47 documents from her server (to date) have been tagged with this classification.

    6. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      | The President has a lot more resources to pay off a blackmail than a former SoS.

      Actually, not true in this case.

      The President has influence and authority, but authority which is mediated through legal processes, paper trail, and agencies with their own independent power. Maybe Obama could convince somehow the CIA to pay off some blackmail from their stash of unmarked bills used to pay overseas informants, but then, CIA would have tremendous blackmail potential over Obama.

      The Clintons have hundreds of millions of dollars as their personal, owned, wealth. Call up a banker somewhere, and it's done.

    7. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      And even if using the official office to assist the blackmailers, the 25th amendment makes it pretty easy to remove their power given their incapacity to faithfully excite the office.

    8. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Britz · · Score: 1

      If you think you are a competing power to the US, there is nothing better that could happen to you than a Trump presidency (if you disagree and think a Trump presidency would be fine, just stop reading). China would most likely love to see that happen, because they want to extend their foothold in the South China Sea.

      I am not so sure about Russia. Deep down they must know they are a third rate country now, albeit with strategic nuclear weapons. Pressuring their neighbors only works, because those neighbors are so much weaker. On the world stage, they are only posturing. So I am not even sure they think they would benefit from a weakened US.

    9. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The State Department might need to intercede on behalf of agents or cooperate with the CIA. It's kind of hard to do either of those things when you have no idea what is happening in the first place.

    10. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What makes you think money is the preferred payment? How about you sit on your hands while we help Assad or do this thing in Ukraine. Or make peace with Iran so we can sell defense armaments to them again.

      There are a lot of methods for payment that do not directly involve money.

    11. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Not correct, as this time the Russian government has a very powerful interest in exposing corruption in the US and forcing the US government to prosecute that corrupt because it completely disrupts that corrupt activity, which includes trying to fomet a cold war to increase arms sales, manipulation of diplomacy to disrupt normal trade and favour specific corporations and corruption of US intelligence services so they provide false data to promote war and arms sales.

      They will also release that information as suits them and so as to create maximum disruption. Right now the US government is blatantly, publicly not pursuing government corruption, preferring instead to focus in whistle blowers, so only US government corruption that targets other countries can be exposed, if those countries choose to act on it or just bend over and accept the US government intrusion. Extortion wont really work, unless it is first proved to be substantively effective by taking down a whole bunch of corrupt politicians and corporate executives first.

      The likely forecast, a series of explosive, well detailed documentaries (with evidence available for download) to be released one after another, to cause maximum embarrassment to the US government and force the US government reputation to be severely tarnished when they yet again failed to prosecute exposed government corruption (for profit war based on WMD lies and torture to fabricate confessions to justify the WMD lie, just the most glaring examples of extreme corruption within the US government not to forget the recording of the US state department picking the next leader of a foreign country in which they had staged a coup).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:So they're going to release Hillary news when? by trichard · · Score: 2

      Why would she have those names? The CIA isn't part of the State Department. If the CIA (or anyone else) is emailing operative's names, the security flaw isn't Clinton's choice of email server, but the emails in the first place.

      The CIA is part of the State department. It's the part authorized to do clandestine operations outside the borders of the US.

  7. Bernie kept his research air gapped by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    in the toaster oven

    And once all 2.3 million outstanding ballots are counted in California (yes, as of today), you'll realize how wise that was.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  8. Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. . by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

    . . . .they already have all they need on Clinton, from her email server. . . .

    The fact that they're looking for dirt on Trump, suggests that they think he might well be elected. . .

  9. Bernie was the first... by mschaffer · · Score: 2

    Bernie was the first to "compromise" data on DNC servers. Did we already forget just how bad some of the DNC data is protected?
    https://medium.com/@AmyKDacey/...

  10. Because monthly blackmail payments by waspleg · · Score: 1

    are worth more than lump sum hush money.

  11. Yawn, it's what spies do. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the US (tries to) bust into the Russian political stuff also.

  12. Trump opposition research: by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quote Trump directly.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re: Trump opposition research: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Trump is completely context free.

    2. Re: Trump opposition research: by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Trump is completely context free.

      but he speaks his mind

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    3. Re: Trump opposition research: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but he speaks his mind

      which has a 128-character limit

    4. Re: Trump opposition research: by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Trump is completely context free.

      but he speaks his mind

      Yeah, people have been noticing that. At first I thought it was just an anti-politically-correct spiel, the line between being Politically Correct and Pissing off the Pope that fine, and now I'm not so sure. I don't disagree with the meat of what he's saying, but he doesn't have to be so unnecessarily imflamatory and he needs to give himself room to escalate and de-escalate as conditions vary.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  13. Re:Security review will clear DNC, it is obvious by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    They had backup copies of the hard disks . . . but they crashed.

    There were backup copies, of the backups, but they have been recycled.

    And, last, but not least . . . "I'll take the fifth amendment and my $200,000 per year pension with me."

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  14. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

    The fact that they're looking for dirt on Trump, suggests that they think he might well be elected. . .

    It doesn't suggest that at all. It would be pretty stupid for Russia not to look into the major political contenders of their primary adversary regardless whether they might win or not.

  15. Russians want Hillary by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    The Russians look at national economic ascendancy like a zero sum game (that's why Russians are so poor).

    They think that if we get pushovers like Obama (who told Putin he was one reelection away from giving him everything Putin wanted) in office that the US will do worse and Russia will do better.

    Russia and the US could actually succeed together if they relaxed commercial barriers. Increased trade rewards value-adds at every stage and more people can compete to fulfill demand (i.e. more jobs).

    To me it makes no sense to punch a guy in the stomach and then think my life is going to be better since it is better relative to someone else. But that's how these guys think.

    But ... sigh ... Trump (like Putin, Obama, and Hillary) is an economic protectionist.

  16. Russians? by whitroth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, they had access for how long? A year? I don't suppose there's *any* chance that the open access that Bernie's folks looked at - one of the first reports I read, never repeated, was the guy in charge of the 4-person team had them look, to see if Hillary had gotten *their* info.

    And then the DNC "cleaned up"?

    I now believe *nothing* the DNC says about its computer systems, or security, since if they'd *actually* cleaned up... they would have caught the Russians *then*, not the beginning of May.

                        mark

    1. Re:Russians? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The Bernie-Hillary cross-contamination was supposedly a lack of robust separation of two groups of authorised users, where this is the penetration by two groups of unauthorised users to probably everything. If they had the security cranked up, only the long-term cadre would have been able to learn how to use, because the volunteers would be their long enough to train.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  17. Contents: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The stolen file reads: "Trump is an arrogant classless bigoted blowhard who often changes his position and rarely offers specifics. Thus, he's a lot like Putin."

    1. Re:Contents: by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      When he looks into his eyes, he sees somebody that he can work with.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Contents: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Didn't W do that, and get hypnotized?

    3. Re:Contents: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, that was a pretzel, and the pretzel won.

  18. Way to go Debbie! by cahuenga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Credit to the DNC and Big Media for spinning this so well. Putin only got got his hands on Trump research.... Nothing on Hillary.

    What a load.

    1. Re:Way to go Debbie! by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >> Putin only got got his hands on Trump research.... Nothing on Hillary.

      There were at least two foreign groups that owned the network. At least one grabbed the Trump material but there's also this rather shocking admission:
      "The intruders so thoroughly compromised the DNC’s system that they also were able to read all email and chat traffic, said DNC officials and the security experts."

      https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-government-hackers-penetrated-dnc-stole-opposition-research-on-trump/2016/06/14/cf006cb4-316e-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html

  19. DNC's research into Trump? by Orgasmatron · · Score: 4, Informative

    ZOMG! Now the Russians know that Trump is racist, sexist, homophobic and Islamophobic. He wants to throw grandma out of the hospital to die on the street, or off a cliff, depending on the topic. At night he hands out fully automatic, laser guided "Assault Guns" with extra-lethal plastic parts to inner city toddlers and mentally unstable Democrats. In his spare time, he is the leader of a secret society of racists known as "the Police" that meets daily to discuss new ways to murder and/or frame innocent black children on their way to church.

    Seriously guys, the DNC's "opposition research" is chiseled in stone, and not exactly secret. They just swap out the name at the top.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I supose you're one of those people that flatly refuse to acknowledge any of the tons of evindence in front of your face that Hilary is the leader of one of the biggest crime families in the US?

    2. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      Might want to read my post again. I'm clearly in the "Hillary 4 Prison 2016" camp.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    3. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my sarcasm detector doesn't work too well before the 1st morning coffee :-)

    4. Re:DNC's research into Trump? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No She's more of a Boss Hogg trying to be another and more successful DeWitt Clinton and establish a federal version of Tammany Hall.
      The biggest difference between Hillary and J.D. Hogg is with Hogg nobody got hurt, with the Clintons they drop like flies and Hillary was a Carpetbagger.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  20. Indict ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... everybody.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  21. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be pretty stupid for Russia not to look into the major political contenders of their primary adversary regardless whether they might win or not.

    It's pretty damned stupid that Russia thinks of the United States (or more accurately, NATO and the West) as their "primary adversary" when they have a near negative birthrate and 1.3 billion neighbors to the east that are far more likely to come looking for Lebensraum.

    I understand the historical reasons for Russia to fear the West -- multiple invasions in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries -- but it's 2016; are the people in Moscow really that stuck in the past? To look at the fat and happy citizens of the West and see an existential threat? I don't think the generation that demands "safe zones" from "microaggressions" is terribly likely to launch Operation Barbarossa II.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  22. Good news! The DNC is worth penetrating! by mveloso · · Score: 2

    The silver lining is that the DNC may actually be worth penetrating! If the GRU thinks there may be something valuable in there then maybe the DNC actually does something of value.

  23. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by sundy58 · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Plus Hillary might launch a nuclear war if the money is right.

  24. Good luck Russia! by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    I think that Trump himself is still trying to figure out what his foreign policies will be!

    Please let the American people know if you figure anything out!

  25. Surprised by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Surprised that the Chinese didn't lock down their DNC espionage better in order to keep the drunk Russians out.

  26. Sometimes looking in the wrong places... by DriveDog · · Score: 2

    A lot of noise is made about foreigners buying influence (over US legislators and executives), but we don't hear much about blackmail. Which might mean that it's been very successful. If Wikileaks can find stuff in emails to get people in trouble, certainly the Russians can find stuff in emails with which to blackmail. The beauty of blackmail is that it's the gift that keeps on giving. The more you succumb to it, the more grip the blackmailer has over you.

  27. Re:Nah, Those Jackasses at the DNC... by PPH · · Score: 1

    Useful idiots, Lenin called them.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  28. Don't believe the SPIN by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hackers broke into the DNC to steal information about their opponent and not their candidate. Now thats some straight up spin. They stole everything that was there but I can guarantee you that they were far more interested in the internal info they had on the DNC candidate. BTW just because the logged-ip addressed point to Russian ip-blocks it doesn't mean that this was done by direction of the Russian government or even that the attack originated in Russia. Using compromised machines under the hackers controll as proxy servers to carry attacks on a 3d party is standard practice. Using machines in countries that are generally considered rivals and are unlikely to cooperate with U.S authorities in an investigation, makes a heck-of-a-lot of sense

    1. Re:Don't believe the SPIN by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 1

      >BTW just because the logged-ip addressed point to Russian ip-blocks it doesn't mean that this was done by direction of the Russian government or even that the attack originated in Russia. In case anyone was curious, the Former Soviet Union (and Russia in particular) tends to have the highest concentration of open proxy servers.

    2. Re:Don't believe the SPIN by axewolf · · Score: 1

      Stop trying to talk sense to the animals.
      The headline is all they need to know.

  29. Enough With The Snarky Comments Already by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do a little reading and you'll find that the Chinese are busy stealing all of our technology and preparing themselves to take out our infrastructure (power-grid, banking, etc.). On the other front the Russians are actively engaging in political sabotage via all means from hordes of message forum trolls to active hacking. Don't think that the upcoming "Brexit" vote isn't being watched with great interest, and actively promoted by the Russians. I remember a few years ago Putin predicting that we'd be in a civil war here in the states by about now. Don't think for a moment that he doesn't have a bunch of shills working the interwebs for Russian interests in fomenting unrest and discontent right here and now.

    1. Re:Enough With The Snarky Comments Already by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Putin shills instigating civil war in the US? Trump praising Putin and Putin all but endorsing Trump? Was Trump sent by the Russians to tear our country in two?

      (Hey, it's not any crazier than the other conspiracy theories that Trump touts.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Enough With The Snarky Comments Already by mschwanke97402 · · Score: 1

      It isn't crazy at all. Read some better European newspapers. The EU types are right now trying to figure out how to handle the torrent of invective and propaganda coming out of a few troll factories operating out of Russia. They have hard documentation on this.

  30. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

    The fact that they're looking for dirt on Trump, suggests that they think he might well be elected. . .

    Well duh, he is the presumptive candidate of one of the two dominant US political parties. His chances of becoming president of the US for the next 4 years are currently better than every other human on the planet except one (by some variable margin). ....uhhboy....

  31. You Forgot One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  32. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by mbkennel · · Score: 2

    | Why they would support Trump I don't know,

    It's literally part of the old KGB playbook. Because POTUS Trump would cause friction between US and European NATO allies. Hurting US/Europe alliances is considered a benefit to Russia.

  33. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Trump is extremely popular in Russia. Everyone is rooting for him over there- both the government and ordinary citizens. They were probably gathering the stuff to hand over to him.

    The real puzzle here is, why does Hillary or anyone else need to do "opposition research" on Trump? He does it for you every time he opens his mouth.

  34. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Russia doesn't fear the West. Putin just wants somebody to be the bad guy - and we do that splendidly. We're much less likely than Islam (in it's various incantations) to come back and bite. It also gives him an excuse to work on the military - something that's good for his hold on power and for his cronies pocket books.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  35. Re:The Russians are not all that bad by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Donald - log in for chrissakes.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  36. Research by rainbird · · Score: 2

    I noticed they collected "Research" on Donald Trump and not intelligence.

  37. Re:The Russians are not all that bad by sysrammer · · Score: 1

    lol

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  38. Trump Blackmailed? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

    Something posters here seem to be missing. This didn't happen last week, it happened almost a year ago. So whatever they wanted to do with the dirt they found out about Trump, they've had it for over a year.

    Trump has been making oddly fanboyish statements about Putin for the last year. It *could* be that he honestly is a fan of that one mid-Eurasian dictator out of all the others like him out there. But the timing opens up other interesting possibilities.

    Trump has also conspicuously refused to release his tax returns, unlike just about every major party nominee since tax returns started.

    It would certainly be interesting if a foreign intelligence service managed to get themselves a major party nominee in their pocket. If I was on the Secret Service detail for Clinton, I'd start screening for polonium in addition to guns.

  39. Horrifying! by newslash.formatblows · · Score: 1

    What if the Russians find out he's a racist, uninformed narcissistic orange bloviating dickhead? We need to protect that information!

  40. Re:Well of COURSE the Russians want dirt on Trump. by budgenator · · Score: 1

    There is Nothing Hillary can say or do will sway Trump Supporters period. There is Nothing Trump can say or do will sway Clinton Supporters period. I don't think either can win with just their supporters so the fight is going to be over the undecided and keeping the "Lean toward one due to the lesser of two evils" leaning the right way and to lesser getting the Bernistas to fall in line.
    Getting the leaning towards and undecided is the sweet spot, that's why in every election the true dyed-in-the-wool supporters feel betrayed.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds