Slashdot Mirror


AMC Threatens Copyright Lawsuit Over Walking Dead Spoiler (torrentfreak.com)

AMC has threatened the people behind The Spoiling Dead community with a lawsuit, asking them to not reveal who gets killed in the last episode of The Walking Dead's ongoing series. The Spoiling Dead community, which has over 350,000 followers on Facebook, obtains all the latest information about the hit show -- some of which are not public, and discusses it within their community. "After two years, AMC finally reached out to us! But it wasn't a request not to post any info about the Lucille Victim or any type of friendly attempt at compromise, it was a cease and desist and a threat of a lawsuit by AMC Holdings, LLC's attorney, Dennis Wilson. They say we can't make any type of prediction about the Lucille Victim," Spoiling Dead team wrote. TorrentFreak reports: AMC's claim that any spoilers will amount to copyright infringement are somewhat eyebrow raising but according to the company this ground has been covered before. "The release of plot summaries and particularly the types of crucial plot elements that you have stated you intend to release, have been found to constitute copyright infringement. Specifically, in Twin Peaks Productions vs. Publications International, the Court ruled that publishing a work that 'recount[s] for its readers precisely the plot details' of a fictional work constitutes copyright infringement."

173 comments

  1. IF they hadn't have made a big deal about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wouldn't know that its leaked, adn wouldn't be on my way to find it now to ruin reddit/imgur/tumbler/facebook/twitter for everyone

    oh well

    1. Re:IF they hadn't have made a big deal about it by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      There is some definite Streisand effect going on here.

      What's more baffling is that so many people are still following a repetitive show that ran out of ideas around the end of season 2

    2. Re: IF they hadn't have made a big deal about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a vengeful idiot

    3. Re: IF they hadn't have made a big deal about it by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      At least he's not wasting something that could otherwise be useful.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:IF they hadn't have made a big deal about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i would have said early season 1, but i agree with the point you're making.

    5. Re:IF they hadn't have made a big deal about it by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I've never really watched the show. I saw part of one episode that was the same stupid stuff I see in every zombie/apocolypse movie. People did stupid stuff, never watched their backs, and the least interisting / newest joined member died. At that rate, how is anyone still alive?

      I doubt it lasted two full seasons before running out of ideas.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re: IF they hadn't have made a big deal about it by Malenx · · Score: 1

      I assume that because the connection with the example case is so stretched thin, they sent that letter on purpose to drum up publicity for the finale. They want the Streisand effect.

  2. I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I will never understand this. "They love our work, lets alienate the ever-loving shit out of them!" Really, it's always a brilliant move folks.

    1. Re:I will never understand this by kelemvor4 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I will never understand this. "They love our work, lets alienate the ever-loving shit out of them!" Really, it's always a brilliant move folks.

      If they ever open a "walking dead world" section of a theme park, maybe fans will be able to buy their very own copy of a threatening letter from a lawyer!

    2. Re:I will never understand this by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Funny

      "They love our work, lets alienate the ever-loving shit out of them!"

      It's the CBS model for the Star Trek franchise.

      https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151230/07472333198/cbs-sues-over-star-trek-fan-film-because-it-sounds-like-going-to-be-pretty-good.shtml

    3. Re:I will never understand this by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And what do the spoilers amount to?

      Basically, "Whoever your favorite character is, he or she will die and become a zombie which the rest of the gang will then immediately savagely kill."

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:I will never understand this by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "Whoever your favorite character is, he or she will die"

      Until that moment I thought you might be talking about Game of Thrones.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:I will never understand this by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      So you're saying your favorite character wasn't the guy fucking his sister?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    6. Re:I will never understand this by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Oh shit! I meant:

      SPOILER ALERT!!! Don't read this if you are binge watching this series from season one!!!

      So you're saying your favorite character isn't the guy fucking his sister?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    7. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whoever your favorite character is, he or she will die"

      Until that moment I thought you might be talking about Game of Thrones.

      Hint: Everybody dies (eventually.)

    8. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.universalstudioshollywood.com/the-walking-dead-attraction/

    9. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are they fans or trolls? They take joy in spoiling the show for others.

    10. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.cinemablend.com/television/How-Universal-Studios-Walking-Dead-Attraction-Like-TV-Show-128787.html

    11. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michael Bolton rapes Salsa Stank. Gordan Ramsay rapes Michael Bolton then Michael Bolton kills Gordan Ramsay.

    12. Re:I will never understand this by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      SNAPE KILLS DUMBL... however the fuck you write that name. The joke's getting old anyway.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Lawsuit was dropped. The film can be made now.

    14. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem, Capitalism. Americans are greedy self-righteous jerks. Why the fuck does this shit surprise anyone?!?!

    15. Re:I will never understand this by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That Lawsuit was dropped. The film can be made now.

      CBS has a long history of going after fan-based projects to "protect" the Star Trek brand. Never mind it was the fans who kept the brand alive for a half-century when CBS had no clue what to do with it.

    16. Re:I will never understand this by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Luke kills Leah when he turns to the dark side!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:I will never understand this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell them to go fuck themselves - it's just a stupid fucking TV show which a tiny proportion of people watch !!!

  3. Uh, seriously, AMC?! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    The butler with the rug beater died.

  4. This series has run its course anyway.. by Ratphace · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If anybody has been watching this series, I think most would agree that it has run its course already. I mean, how many episodes do you want to watch them killing zombies and trying to keep them at bay? Let's face it, the people in the series aren't very bright, because if I was living in the south of the USA when this occurred, then I would say that it's quite logical to head for the coast and get out to an island seeing as how zombies haven't mastered the breaststroke or freestyle techniques. There are many small islands in the gulf coast area. They seemingly have cars and fuel for everything else in the series, so why not go get on an island? I liked this series a lot in the beginning, but as it wore on, I have myself bored with it. Honestly, I never even finished the most recent season simply because it's just repetitive with nothing more innovative and exciting in the last couple seasons. Just my 2 cents.

    1. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by rwven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I gave up caring about the characters a couple seasons ago. It's devolved into a constant barrage of idiots making dumb decision after dumb decision. None of these people would be alive at this point after alienating every person they come across. They also haven't come up with a single new or inventive plot device since season 2.

    2. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      troll, they should keep the show going for decades like General Hospital or One Life to Live or any other daytime soap where they recycle the plot lines every few years

    3. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was more than one season? Wow - people must really like the zombie thing. This particular theme I never liked but it is all the same with any - at some point the whole thing gets commoditized and at the end they make a series out of it and repeat it many times. It is rather annoying after a while. As for zombies the suspension of reality never worked for me.

    4. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was the first thing I thought of too. I think most people with a couple brain cells thought of the same thing. Pretty sure that's why they addressed that in Fear TWD...

    5. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up caring about the characters a couple seasons ago. It's devolved into a constant barrage of idiots making dumb decision after dumb decision.

      Uh, it's always been a constant barrage of idiots making dumb decision and dumb decision. Honestly, [spoiler] Shaun of the Dead did it better[/spoiler].

    6. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought if I were in their shoes that I'd set up zombie traps that would attract them with sound and and funnel them into a lobster-trap-type area where exit is impossible for things as dumb as zombies. There they could be periodically dispatched, or, depending, safely ignored until they rotted away. A fancier arrangement possibly could be set up to behead them and drop their bodies into a pit. Whatever, it's pretty silly to set up a fortification and take your chances, when you could at least scrub the surrounding area of most zombies automatically.

    7. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      In world war z they can't swim but they can move through the water since they don't need to breathe. I don't watch the show so I dunno if they've addressed it or not.

    8. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Yea, I stopped watching it a season or two ago, it just got too ridiculous.
      But if you ever mention this to rabid fans you get the same tired excuse, "its a comic book!"
      Maybe thats why I always read actual books...

      The tragedy is this show had promise, and could have been something really good.
      Instead it ended up with writers who really need their asses kicked...

      It always made me wonder what the process was when the writers, etc, were sitting around, kicking around ideas of what was going to happen in the episodes/seasons.

      What were they thinking?

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    9. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The zombies walk on the sea floor, or float there. According to the canon of the show(s), they'd get to your island eventually.

      Getting to an area where the zombies would freeze seems smarter.

    10. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't watched the series, but if the dead don't breathe then they can walk across oceans with little problem. Only the pressure could be an issue. They'd have to find the island, which could take awhile, but you wouldn't be safe there. It'd only be a matter of time. A boat in the open ocean would likely work too, unless the zombies were super smart and could make zombie pyramids with their bodies.

      What you'd want to do is go someplace that's always frozen. I'd assume zombies aren't full of antifreeze. Frozen people can't move. Space could also work, but we don't have a good track record with that either.

    11. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      The Walking Dead hasn't used amnesia as a reason to bring back a long-thought-dead character? Excuse me, I need to go pitch a spec script.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    12. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tragedy is this show had promise, and could have been something really good.
      Instead it ended up with writers who really need their asses kicked...

      Devil's advocate... Never discount the possibility that the writers themselves are quite competent but being restricted, coerced or forced in directions they don't want to go by some incompetent jobsworth higher up in the management or production hierarchy trying to force themselves onto it.

    13. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Let's face it, the people in the series aren't very bright, because if I was living in the south of the USA when this occurred, then I would say that it's quite logical to head for the coast and get out to an island seeing as how zombies haven't mastered the breaststroke or freestyle techniques.

      The most interesting thing about the Walking Dead is that the zombies weren't the most dangerous threat -- it was other people after the breakdown of society.

      I liked this series a lot in the beginning, but as it wore on, I have myself bored with it.

      I watched a few episodes from the first season and quickly found it boring because of the pacing. Game of Thrones, on the other hand, I look forward to every week.

    14. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Yeah, IMO the show jumped the shark around Season 4. I stopped watching after Hershel died. All the characters I liked kept getting killed off.

    15. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought if I were in their shoes that I'd set up zombie traps that would attract them with sound and and funnel them into a lobster-trap-type area where exit is impossible for things as dumb as zombies.

      "Next week on Walking Deadliest Catch: the crew of the S.S. Coral runs into trouble when their youngest member gets shot again, while the captain of the One-Eyed Bandit struggles to maintain morale after his first mate discovers he's been lying to the crew..."

    16. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by CameronSchuyler · · Score: 1

      It's the most popular show on TV. It's a cash cow. It definitely hasn't run its course. Please elaborate on what decisions you think were "stupid". It's no safer on an island in this fictional universe they've constructed, as you can see from Fear the Walking Dead. You're missing out if you can't overlook a few plot-lines that don't sync up with what you think the outcome should have been. This last episode's ending was literally the most intense scene I'd ever watched on TV. BUT, you have to be invested in the characters to enjoy it. Meanwhile.... the pacing of the show has slowed down, they are understandably milking each season for every moment they can. Their spinoff series is falling short - although it is finally starting to get interesting - and this is just another sign of AMC's need to capitalize on what makes their studios money. This recent cease and desist letter is a huge slap in the face to fans and treads on the 1st Amendment and crosses the line. The letter doesn't make sense. What the studio dictates, the creators have to abide by to keep their paychecks coming in - it's a committee process for practically every decision they make on and off the show. Politics aside, I'm still a fan.

    17. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that, like, season one episode one...?

    18. Re: This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't follow it closely, but the zombies are following typical decay/putrefaction timeline.

      The survivors are moving further North, which slows decay and the days the series covers has been shortening.

      I can only guess this is to artificially extend the series. Except for fresh corpses, places near the equator shouldn't have zombies at all any more. Between 18 months and 3 years for soft tissue to decompose in an open environment.

      Unless the virus is magic and people accept skeleton warriors. People should be reforming society, cremations commonplace, and zombies generally viewed as a nuisance.

    19. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did this at the beginning of season 6. An entire quarry was filled with them, with truck trailers blocking them in... yea.. they were stupid and let them out....

    20. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you don't even own a TV!

    21. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Agripa · · Score: 2

      It's a world filled with shambling, mindless monstrosities, totally incapable of logic, forethought, or fulfilling anything but their most base needs. Also, there are zombies.

    22. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped watching after season 2, but i've watched single episodes after that. Maybe i've seen most of season 3 as a rerun. Just got fed up with the stupidity of the characters. And riddle me this: how can the zombies just be there year after year even though their corpses keep rotting away?

    23. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      I gave up caring about the characters a couple seasons ago. It's devolved into a constant barrage of idiots making dumb decision after dumb decision. None of these people would be alive at this point after alienating every person they come across. They also haven't come up with a single new or inventive plot device since season 2.

      In that respect one must give it a lot of credit for being very honest about Homo sapiens limitations and tendencies towards the irrational, especially in stressful conditions. After a while thou this just stops making for good entertainment unfortunately

    24. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like ... ... winter?

    25. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which decision was stupid? Well, the most important decision of all. Greenlighting this piece of garbage show!

    26. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      And that's just what's happening in the writer's room!

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    27. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The last season has actually been quite a bit better. They changed the writers and some other senior staff and it's worked wonders. I was on the verge of giving up, but the last season, and especially the last episode kept me watching.

      It's far from perfect, but there isn't much good on at the moment so it's welcome.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Kinwolf · · Score: 1

      I don't watch the TV show, but in the comics, this was addressed. Short answer:(and I hope you realize I am now a target of potential lawsuit for revealing this plot point!!) Islands are now full of zombies too, because many people had that idea, but some brought contaminated people with them, thinking they could save them before they turned(family members, loved one, etc).

    29. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      It also applies (big-time) to their legal department.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    30. Re: This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Unless the virus is magic and people accept skeleton warriors.

      The virus is magic, because zombies are thermodynamically impossible. It's just part of the suspension of disbelief you need to watch any zombie shows or movies.

      The only explanation I can think of that's slightly plausible is that the virus mutates your cells so that they slowly consume their neighbors. So they don't need blood flow or oxygen to keep alive, and your body decays but what's left keeps moving.

      The creatures may be driven to eat, but don't actually need to. Still, dehydration would be a problem.

    31. Re:This series has run its course anyway.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last season has actually been quite a bit better. They changed the writers and some other senior staff and it's worked wonders.

      I had a very different reaction. I thought the last season had the worst plot holes and character decisions of all. To be clear, I haven't read any of the comic books, so some of my disappointment might be addressed there. However, that still isn't an excuse for a stand-alone TV series, particularly one which deviates quite a bit in some ways from the comic books, in which for example, Daryl doesn't exist.

      I'm willing to ignore small stuff, like Carl aging quickly while Judith remains an infant. Nothing's perfect, and they have to work with the actor growing up across 6 years of TV representing 2 years or so of plot, while simultaneously keeping Judith as a useful inconvenience. I'm also willing to suspend disbelief on the core necessities, like zombie metabolism and function, even when worn/cut/burnt down to nearly the bone, let alone the laws of thermodynamics. If one cannot do that, don't bother watching any zombie show at all.

      This last season has been the first where I was increasingly disappointed with the credibility of both the plot and some of the characters' decisions:

      1) Abraham has military experience, yet never once urged recon before Rick settled on the plan to attack the Savior compound (later understood to be merely an outpost) under the assumption that the intel that they had from Hilltop was accurate and that the Saviors weren't much larger than Hilltop assumed. Even Daryl, lacking military experience, should have suggested recon before planning. Moreover, the "Jesus" character should at least have suspicions as to the potentially broader size and organization. As the apparent scavenger-in-chief for Hilltop, surely he must have seen some evidence that the Saviors might be larger than that single outpost.

      2) Rick summarily executes the last outpost resident without showing any interest in what he might have to say, and way too readily accepting his claim to be Negan. Rick used to be a cop, FFS. Nobody present, including Abraham, interjects on the grounds of possibly gaining more useful intel through interrogation. Note that at that point it was clear that the Saviors, as the Alexandrians understood them at that time, had at least one satellite outpost (where Maggie and Carol were briefly held), yet nobody thought to keep the not-actually-Negan dude around long enough to question him about other possible weapon/food/whatever caches. Or even just about where all the weed was going to go. They were clearly growing too much for local consumption, and Rick would understand a grow operation based on his LEO experience in a semi-rural locality outside Atlanta.

      3) Nobody even considers the possibility that Hilltop might be infiltrated by Negan's spies. It doesn't look like that was the case, but nobody even considered it.

      4) (minor point) I'm not sure I buy the squeamishness about killing the living by some of the characters this far into a zombie apocalypse. I don't mean Morgan, nor most of the Alexandrians who had a relatively sheltered existence before the main group arrived. Of course, I've never had to do it, so I could be way off base here.

      5) Lately, people keep sneaking up on Daryl like he had lived his entire life in Brooklyn instead of the backwoods. Naturally, it could happen now and then, but he was all-too-frequently surprised in the outdoors this season, especially once we recall that Aaron highlighted for the viewers Daryl's capabilities by commenting on how Daryl could distinguish living from dead by the sound of their walks in the wilderness.

      6) They still have terribly deficient security protocols at the Alexandria compound. Apparently Abraham has forgotten everything the Army ever taught him, and even Rick's LEO training has been lost to him.

      7) They haven't gone out to ensure that the Wolves are actually exterminated, not to mention appro

  5. seems explotable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Character A is going to Die.
    Character B is going to Die.
    Character C is going to Die.
    Character D is going to Die.
    Character E is going to Die.

    Receive lawsuit saying "Character D is going to die" is copyright violation. Ok. Now we know what will happen.

    1. Re:seems explotable by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Trinity dies.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re: seems explotable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C3PO is Luke's actual mother.

    3. Re: seems explotable by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Spock comes back to save Gondor.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    4. Re: seems explotable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luke and Leia are really the same person via split personality.

  6. Not the same... from TFA by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Informative

    By citing a specific case one might conclude that AMC’s attorney is confident that the cases are similar, but reading the details casts more than just a little doubt on his claims.

    The historical case in question involved the publication of a book by Publications International which covered in detail the first eight episodes of the 1990/91 TV series Twin Peaks. The big question was whether this use of copyright works was protected under fair use but in the end the court decided the publisher had gone too far.

    The court found that the defendant’s “detailed recounting of the show’s plotlines went far beyond merely identifying their basic outline for the transformative purposes of comment or criticism” adding:

    Because the plot synopses were so detailed, and in fact lifted many sections verbatim from the original scripts, the court found that defendant copied a substantial amount of plaintiff’s original works.

    This hardly seems to mirror the situation playing out alongside a potential spoiler of an unaired episode of The Walking Dead. Presumably that spoiler can be achieved by saying a single name too, which by no stretch of the imagination amounts to a substantial part of any show.

    I'm ambivalent about spoilers myself, just knowing who it is doesn't equal seeing it play out with the acting, effects, etc. Sometimes I'm glad not to know, sometimes I wish I didn't know a spoiler, sometimes I love knowing.

    1. Re:Not the same... from TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might get in trouble from plenty of fans for revealing a spoiler, but you shouldn't get in legal trouble for only revealing who Luke Skywalker's dad is (to use a different example) unless you signed some kind of contract saying you wouldn't. It sounds like the AMC lawyers are vastly exaggerating their case.

  7. Maybe stop with the cheap cliffhangers, AMC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously. Stop with the cheap fakeout and cliffhangers. Quality writing over cheap gimmicks.

    1. Re:Maybe stop with the cheap cliffhangers, AMC! by gatfirls · · Score: 1

      Came to say this. They are basically saying the most important part of the cliffhanger is not the outcome but that the cliffhanger itself gets a few more eyeballs on the premier.

    2. Re:Maybe stop with the cheap cliffhangers, AMC! by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      cheap cliffhangers have been done as long as storytelling has been around.

    3. Re:Maybe stop with the cheap cliffhangers, AMC! by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Can anyone say "Scheherazade"?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re:Maybe stop with the cheap cliffhangers, AMC! by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can anyone say "Scheherazade"?

      I certainly can't, and I have no idea if anyone actually can, but I'm intrigued! When should I tune in to find out the answer?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  8. Yeah, right... by jamescford · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to Stanford's Copyright and Fair Use summary (http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/cases/) that Twin Peaks case might not be the precedent they say it is.

    Not a fair use. A company published a book entitled Welcome to Twin Peaks: A Complete Guide to Who’s Who and What’s What, containing direct quotations and paraphrases from the television show Twin Peaks, as well as detailed descriptions of plots, characters, and setting. Important factors: The amount of the material taken was substantial and the publication adversely affected the potential market for authorized books about the program. (Twin Peaks v. Publications Int’l, Ltd., 996 F.2d 1366 (2d Cir. 1993).)

    (emphasis added)

    1. Re:Yeah, right... by StinkiePhish · · Score: 4, Informative
      The language in the case couldn't be more clear that it was not "crucial plot elements" that the case was about, but pure copying:

      Defendants have directly copied or paraphrased substantial portions of TPP's teleplays. Much of the book consists of detailed description of the plot, setting, and character development of the first eight episodes of "Twin Peaks." Excerpts from episodes are quoted verbatim. A work that is literally similar may be found to be an infringement of copyright.

      This Court further finds that because "Welcome to Twin Peaks" is based on the teleplay and employs direct quotations and paraphrases, it is a derivative work.

    2. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Obviously which character was killed is not covered by copyright. It could, however, be argued to be a trade secret, since measures have been taken to protect it, and it could be argued that the public not knowing it makes it valuable.

    3. Re:Yeah, right... by Theaetetus · · Score: 2

      According to Stanford's Copyright and Fair Use summary (http://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/cases/) that Twin Peaks case might not be the precedent they say it is.

      Not a fair use. A company published a book entitled Welcome to Twin Peaks: A Complete Guide to Who’s Who and What’s What, containing direct quotations and paraphrases from the television show Twin Peaks, as well as detailed descriptions of plots, characters, and setting. Important factors: The amount of the material taken was substantial and the publication adversely affected the potential market for authorized books about the program. (Twin Peaks v. Publications Int’l, Ltd., 996 F.2d 1366 (2d Cir. 1993).)

      (emphasis added)

      It may be... FTA:

      “AMC is aware that The Spoiling Dead Fans site is promoting your claim that you have received copyright protected, trade secret information about the most critical plot information in the unreleased next season of The Walking Dead,” the letter begins. “You also state that you plan to distribute this purported highly confidential information despite your knowledge that such distribution, if the information is indeed accurate, is unauthorized and will greatly damage AMC, distributors of The Walking Dead as well as Walking Dead fans awaiting the new seasons’ release who wish to watch their favorite show unspoiled.”

      While we can't know for certain without seeing the letter and/or what the Spoiling Dead folks claim to have received, this doesn't appear to be about predictions, as much as stolen copies of scripts or something.

    4. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was some other case, which I had forgotten, where some newspaper review of a book 'spoiled' the one important thing in the book. That said, I think that it actually did this pre-release and they lost a court case because the court thought that this one big thing in the book was the only part worth knowing.

      Still, I can't see any good reason to alienate one's fans like this and copyright law is just kinda silly sometimes.

    5. Re:Yeah, right... by Pembers · · Score: 1

      You may be thinking of Harper & Row v Nation Enterprises. The publisher of President Ford's memoirs sued the publisher of a magazine for printing a review of the book that contained about a page's worth of quotations from it. That much would normally be fair use (the book is about 500 pages), but the quotations contained the only information from the book that most people were really interested in - Ford's account of why he pardoned Richard Nixon.

    6. Re:Yeah, right... by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      Trade secrets aren't protected by any law. Being a trade secret only means it is freely sharable if someone else figures it out.

    7. Re:Yeah, right... by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 1

      "this doesn't appear to be about predictions, as much as stolen copies of scripts or something."

      But TSDF isn't implying that they are going to release a copy of the full script, which would be a copyright violation, but rather the simple name of a character. If, per Twin Peaks, they don't accompany that with substantial verbatim excepts from the script, then it is quite likely that the release of a name would be be fair use (if the publication of a characters name would even violate copyright at all, which if it didn't wouldn't even need a a fair use exception)

    8. Re:Yeah, right... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      "this doesn't appear to be about predictions, as much as stolen copies of scripts or something."

      But TSDF isn't implying that they are going to release a copy of the full script, which would be a copyright violation, but rather the simple name of a character. If, per Twin Peaks, they don't accompany that with substantial verbatim excepts from the script, then it is quite likely that the release of a name would be be fair use (if the publication of a characters name would even violate copyright at all, which if it didn't wouldn't even need a a fair use exception)

      For copyright purposes, yes... However, it would still be misappropriation of trade secrets, which has no fair use defense, and is just as illegal.

    9. Re:Yeah, right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For copyright purposes, yes... However, it would still be misappropriation of trade secrets, which has no fair use defense, and is just as illegal.

      The two situations are not as different as they might seem.

      Fair use in copyright law is a direct consequence of the Bill of Rights, however much the unethical portion of the US legal profession (perhaps the majority) would prefer to deny that. Any form of reasonable conduct is protected under the 9th Amendment, as a fundamental right in a free country, and also as a consequence of the right to ethical practice of law (not just a 9th Amendment right, but an universal and inalienable right in any society based on the rule of law). Fair use is fundamentally about reasonable conduct, however much some of the lawyers have tried to conceal this, and thus is a Bill of Rights matter.

      Trade secret laws in many respects violate the Bill of Rights as well. Congress can not, for example, pass any law infringing freedom of speech, or the press (1st Amendment). For Congress to pass a law to the contrary creates a contradiction within in the legal system, and that always involves unethical practice of law (and hence a violation of rights arising under the 9th Amendment). Many elements of trade secret laws clearly things infringe freedom of speech.

      The fundamental issue here is that Congress is both lazy and corrupt. A responsible and ethical Congress would not attempt to pass laws infringing freedom of speech without first amending the Constitution. A lot of illegal laws get written as a result. They count on the public being too stupid and too self-centered to do anything about this. Unfortunately. the US legal profession is happy to profit from this situation, rather then try to do anything about it, despite the oaths they take. Worse, various associations of lawyers actively donate money to both political parties, and one can presume that this is being done to ensure the status quo continues.

  9. Apparently at AMC "IP" stands for Idiot Pinheads by skids · · Score: 1

    I like the show, but then, I liked Breaking Bad too and still stopped in the middle, for no particular reason. I don't need reasons to stop watching a show, but if the thought crosses my mind, this'll be one.

    Stop suing fans.

    Idiots.

  10. next stop sue IMDB and Wikipedia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is straight up legal bullying and the backlash will be painful.

  11. Over-reaching by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " Court ruled that publishing a work that 'recount[s] for its readers precisely the plot details' of a fictional work constitutes copyright infringement.""

    Saying "Joe Blow died." does not reach the "precisely" level.

    1. Re:Over-reaching by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If I were to take a guess, AMC is taking "precisely" to mean the same thing as"accurately", and so if the statement simply accurately (however generally) describes a plot detail (that is, to use your example, the character Joe Blow died) then it meets that definition of "precisely".

    2. Re:Over-reaching by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

      If I were to take a guess, AMC is taking "precisely" to mean the same thing as"accurately", and so if the statement simply accurately (however generally) describes a plot detail (that is, to use your example, the character Joe Blow died) then it meets that definition of "precisely".

      DetailS. So no, it doesn't.

    3. Re:Over-reaching by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Well, I said it was just a guess. I honestly have no idea how else they could interpret a general description of plot details as being "precise".

    4. Re:Over-reaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tack on something absurd like "Joe Blow died wearing a pink polkadot cowboy hat" making it imprecise yet the audience still knows what you mean.

  12. are they past the comic books? by foradoxium · · Score: 1

    I stopped watching after the 2nd season, so I'm not sure but aren't they still loosely following the comic book plots? If so, how can they prevent people from talking about potential plots for work already released?

    Does the law actually prevent people from discussing potential plots for shows? Can websites really be sued for people trying to figure out who the Emperor is in StarWars, and if Luke is really the father of Rey?

    Or are they receiving the C&D because they are supposedly getting ahold of and releasing official plot writings? I *might* be okay with that. But surely the law isn't saying fans can't discuss among themselves and unofficially work out potential plotlines?

    1. Re:are they past the comic books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, in the comics they showed Negan kill Glenn, show won't be there until next season.

    2. Re:are they past the comic books? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I stopped watching after the 2nd season, so I'm not sure but aren't they still loosely following the comic book plots?

      Loosely yes, from what I understand (never read the comics). But they've changed the dynamics of some of the groups/characters, added/removed/combined characters (Darryl isn't even in the comics but they'll never kill him off because they'd lose at least 2/3 of the female viewership)), killed off some characters that should still be alive and vice versa, and done some things in different orders. So just because a character might die at a certain point in the comics doesn't mean they will die at the same time in the show.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:are they past the comic books? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still have quite a lot to get to where the comics are.

  13. Proper use of 'allegedly' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't post the information as 'fact', simply use the term 'allegedly' as in "I have heard rumours that in the final episode so-and-so allegedly dies' etc. 'In an allegedly very gruesome manner that may or may involve being eaten by a zombie'.

    Heck, I don't know. I don't watch the show & would just prefer this whole 'zombie craze' would die off.

    1. Re:Proper use of 'allegedly' by whoozwah · · Score: 2

      would just prefer this whole 'zombie craze' would die off.

      But then wouldn't it just come back?

    2. Re:Proper use of 'allegedly' by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Almost as if the craze were 'undead'?

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    3. Re:Proper use of 'allegedly' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the world will have it's zombie outbreak eventually.

      only it will be cellphone junkies when the power goes out for an extended time. not dead people.

  14. Fuck'em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create a group on Telegram (russian) and threema (swiss)... Let's see the fuckers threaten them...

  15. This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. It's Glenn! by downright · · Score: 1

    It's Glenn! It's so Glenn! You know it's Glenn!

    I don't actually know, but come on... you know it's Glenn.

  17. Cliff Notes by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess Cliff Notes are off the table, too.

  18. They should post fake spoilers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they want to keep it a secret who dies, then they should start "leaking" fake spoilers, and then just sit back and say nothing. As a bonus, it probably would cost less to create those fake spoilers, than it would to actually go through with a lawsuit.

  19. now go off and be a good fan by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

    send AMC lots and lots of money and watch the show with your mouth open and slobber dripping off your lips as you get surprised like you're supposed to so you keep watching and sending them more money. and don't forget to play the games and buy the trinkets

  20. Talking Dead Implied Otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They say we can't make any type of prediction about the Lucille Victim

    The last Talking Dead before the break implied otherwise. They flat-out said that they had dropped hints throughout the episode on who dies. You don't fucking say something like that, and then expect fans to NOT speculate on who dies.

  21. this is stupid, that show is stupid by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Informative

    No matter how many Japanese soldiers, headhunters, astronauts and Harlem Globetrotters land on that island, Gilligan, the Skipper too, the millionaire and his wife, the movie star, and the rest are never getting off that fucking island.

    PS it's Glenn
    Somebody had to take one for the team, and he's damn sure going to make sure it's not Maggie and their babby.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Can't be Glenn. After the trash bin incident, it has been proven that Glenn is immortal.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re: this is stupid, that show is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he already had a close shave earlier that encounter when he thought Maggie was going to be picked. My bet's on Eugene.

    3. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They did get off the island.

      And yeah, it's Glenn. And nobody cares. TWD jumped the shark 2 or 3 seasons ago. I hate-watched the last two seasons hoping they'd kill off Carl. I won't bother with the next season. It's boring, the plot is nonsensical, and the characters are insufferable. AMC is going to drag the show on for eons, so you can count out any meaningful developments. They're so audacious they created a separate series (Fear the Walking Dead) to double-milk the franchise.

      AMD tried to do the same with Breaking Bad by splitting the 5th season out into 2 parts while they tried desperately to convince the creator to keep going. Thankfully, they failed. They wrangled up a spinoff though (Better Call Saul).

    4. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody had to take one for the team, and he's damn sure going to make sure it's not Maggie and their babby.

      He who, Glenn? You think if Negan picked Maggie, Glenn would volunteer? An interesting theory, except we already know no one volunteered.

    5. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      Better Call Saul is a lot more interesting and innovative than Breaking Bad was, even though BCS is storytelling with one hand behind its back - that is, that you already know what the fate of several of the major characters is.

    6. Re: this is stupid, that show is stupid by fatboy · · Score: 1

      It's Rick. He needs to die to move the story beyond the comic.

      --
      --fatboy
    7. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I enjoyed the first 2 seasons of Better Call Saul, but it's not really innovative. (Has it been 2 seasons? Or 1 and a half? AMC and other cable networks love to break seasons into parts, so I can't even tell anymore.)

      Breaking Bad wasn't very innovative either, it just had a few amazing actors and a lot of tense moments. That tension works when a show isn't afraid to kill off characters and isn't afraid to end the story when it's appropriate. Because Better Cal Saul is a prequel spin off, there hasn't really been any meaningful tension. Mike and Saul are the only characters people really care about, and we know what happens to them. It means I can watch it for the characters, but not the overall story.

      On The Walking Dead, characters have plot armor. Carl gets shot in the eye, slaps on an eye patch, and everything is hunky-dory. Glen dies, but wait, that was a fake out, the other guy we wrote for everyone to hate dies, and Glen lives! Deaths of major characters aren't done when they make sense, they're done for shock and ratings, and the laziest writing possible is trotted out to tell us how they died. How fucking absurd was Dale's death? Or any of the dozens of times they've suddenly found themselves surrounded by hundreds of zombies in the middle of an open field or on the highway, while they had lookouts? I can't watch it for the story because it's tripe, and I can't watch it for the characters because I hate them all.

    8. Re: this is stupid, that show is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't be Rick or his son, because the bad guy said, "if anyone moves, cut out his other eye and feed it to his father."

    9. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I can't watch it for the story because it's tripe, and I can't watch it for the characters because I hate them all"
      Then why watch at all?

    10. Re: this is stupid, that show is stupid by fatboy · · Score: 1

      That's exactly why it's Rick.

      --
      --fatboy
    11. Re: this is stupid, that show is stupid by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      They should have killed Rick at the prison.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    12. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Or any of the dozens of times they've suddenly found themselves surrounded by hundreds of zombies in the middle of an open field or on the highway, while they had lookouts?

      This is really the main reason I stopped watching.
      Calling the writers idiotic is going easy.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    13. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did get off the island.

      And then get shipwrecked on the same island. It's the show that goes on and on my friend.

    14. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by meglon · · Score: 1
      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    15. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, didn't Abraham volunteer?

    16. Re: this is stupid, that show is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we can all agree that the one character that needs to be beaten with a baseball bat the most is Carl, which is why it almost certainly isn't going to be him.

    17. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      It's most likely the red haired guy. He left the unsatisfying relationship he was in and confessed his love for that other girl telling her he was ready to have children. The only thing more likely to get him killed is saying something about this being his last mission, he's getting out in two days to go home to his wife and two loving children.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    18. Re:this is stupid, that show is stupid by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I've seen the last series and still don'y know what this means. Didn't the guy start hitting Carl? Glenn tried to intervene but was stopped. Or is this something that has only happened in the comics?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  22. Workaround?? by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    Don't all they hafta do is preface every spoiler with: "Ya know what I think's gonna happen....." ?

  23. Is it Jeff? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Is it Jeff? I hope it's Jeff. No-one likes Jeff.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Is it Jeff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its eugene

  24. AMC can go fuck themselves. by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Did they sign an NDA??? No? Then they aren't doing anything wrong by publish plot details that they never agreed to keep private in the first place.

    Although giving the matter the further thought, maybe AMC is just trying to use the publicity of this lawsuit to generate more interest in their show.

  25. plot details constitutes copyright infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bad news for Wikipedia, Wookiepedia and all the other 'pedias.

  26. No more book reports on non Public Domain works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess everyone who had been requested to do a book report for any book which is not in the Public Domain will be in violation of copyright by this logic.

    This is the same for anything which discusses the plot of any ongoing non-public domain fiction.

    1. Re:No more book reports on non Public Domain works by Almahtar · · Score: 1

      ... or non-fiction. Just because the written/recorded work was based on real-world facts doesn't mean that it isn't copyrightable. It just helps distinguish how ridiculous it is that re-telling a story is somehow copyright infringement. If it isn't infringement with non-fiction it shouldn't be with fiction either (unless it is so extremely similar that it doesn't get fair-use protection for derived works).

      Not a lawayer, just my opinion, blah blah

  27. Colony is the new replacement by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    Walking Dead got boring three seasons in and don't even enjoy watching it anymore. With Colony, The Expanse, Killjoys and many other sci-fi coming back in full force zombie drama is done.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Colony is the new replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Expanse is garbage. Off-world people relying on interplanetary shipments of water? Fuck. That. Shit.

    2. Re:Colony is the new replacement by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Think te le vi si on.

      Defiance had a good chance to have a nice show with drama and space/alien battles to fill several niches in one shot but they butchered it.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    3. Re:Colony is the new replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm definitely waiting for the return of The Expanse and Killjoys. Now it seems I'll have to go watch Colony too.

    4. Re:Colony is the new replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, was watching on Netflix, and in season 3 it was just, this is not worth watching ...

    5. Re:Colony is the new replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the books. The water shipments are only the backstory to how the main characters get together. Since the TV series is moving along far slower than the books, it looks more important than it actually is. The books don't stay in the asteroid belt and hopefully the TV show leaves it behind too.

      If you like Stargate, take a chance on the books, the two series aren't completely dissimilar.

    6. Re:Colony is the new replacement by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Not watching TWD anymore either - got utterly boring, but please... on IMDb
      7.3 Colony
      8.2 The Expanse
      7.1 Killjoys
      8.6 The Walking Dead

      Still waiting for a decent TWD replacement...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  28. Glenn dies there I said it by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    now gimme my 15 min of fame.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Glenn dies there I said it by CameronSchuyler · · Score: 1

      In the comics Glen dies... but who knows what they will do in the show. Glen is a beloved character and they may go another route to keep him on the show longer. However, they did foreshadow his death several times on the show already (baseball bat held by Glen in earlier scenes, death by the dumpster avoided) and I agree with you that they will more than likely kill off Glen. What has me doubting that Glen dies are the recent photos of Norman Reedus and Steven Yeun on their way to set (they helped some people in an accident at an intersection on the way). But if they went with every plot-line from the comics, Judith, the baby on the show, would have died with her mother by falling from the roof of the prison and being shot by the Governor. Just sayin'... it's a toss-up.

  29. Ok I am confused here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is AMC not suing Wikipedia? If you read Wikipedia on the character Negan, what happens at the end of the season is spelled out in plain english.
    In fact one would be puzzled why AMC is not suing Robert Kirkman for spoiling the death we are talking about in the comic books before the show.

    The argument that AMC is making here is idiotic and pointless and it is clearly nothing more than a money grab.

    1. Re:Ok I am confused here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is AMC not suing Wikipedia? If you read Wikipedia on the character Negan, what happens at the end of the season is spelled out in plain english.
      In fact one would be puzzled why AMC is not suing Robert Kirkman for spoiling the death we are talking about in the comic books before the show.

      The argument that AMC is making here is idiotic and pointless and it is clearly nothing more than a money grab.

      How bad would everyone shit if it turned out to be Daryl Dixon?

      If I were Negan, based on what happened with his biker crew Daryl is the one I would kill.

  30. Sorry lawyer, you fail law by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    You can't copyright a plot. You can only copyright your expression of it, eg: the script you wrote or the TV show you're producing.
    You can't stop anyone from creating their own versions of the plot.

  31. Techdirt's take on the matter by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160613/01084434693/pure-bullshit-amc-threatens-huge-fan-community-with-copyright-claim-over-spoiler-predictions.shtml

    It would be great if the EFF got involved so The Spoiling Dead could take AMC to court. And IMHO this would be worth the EFF's time and money. Somebody needs to keep (re-)drawing the line between legitimate copyright claims, and spurious ownership claims made by corporations that piss on everything in sight like some not-house-broken dog in their efforts to mark it all as their own. Under the current civil law setup, average citizens simply can't afford to defend their own rights against bullies such as AMC.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  32. Matter of Law by CPIMatt · · Score: 2

    Their argument citing that case is pretty weak. In that case, Publisher's International published a book about the TV show Twin Peaks, after the show came out. A very in-depth book citing plots, actors, dialogue, etc. Although Publisher's International didn't have copies of the script, they did copy basically the TV show after it came out. In this case it would be very hard to prove that the website had any such access, especially since the Walking Dead show has not come out yet. They probably haven't even registered their copyright. Plus it is obviously commentary on the show. However these days the one with the deepest pocket wins in court, sadly.

    -Matt

  33. You've got to be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People watch the walking dead? Here are your spoilers for the last episode:

    1. Flat tedious characters will flee zombies who are considerably more compelling than they are
    2. Various people lament about their inability to save people they care about again
    3. The actor playing 'Carl' tries so hard act ... unsuccessfully :(

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding me by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

      Z-nation is better

    2. Re:You've got to be kidding me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TWD could certainly learn a thing or two from Z-Nation, like getting a goddamn sense of humor about itself and not staying in just one boring ass area for an entire season or two.

        I stopped watching TWD mainly because it is so relentlessly nihilistic. No good deed, no act of mercy, no human kindness or compassion is ever rewarded by improving the group's lot in the long term. It always, always goes to shit in the end while being exceeding brutal. I know its a horror show, but still you'd think there would at least be some opportunities for a little gallows humor now and then. Nope, everything is dead serious and boring ponderous all the time.

  34. So what if you knew who's gonna die? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Remember Colombo? You saw exactly, in the first few minutes, who's killing whom, with what motivation and in what way, no doubt about who killed whom, how, why and where.

    And still people watched. Why? Because it's interesting how the whole thing unfolds.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:So what if you knew who's gonna die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, now I want to watch some Columbo...

    2. Re:So what if you knew who's gonna die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Remember Colombo?

      The man in the dirty Mack who discovered America?

      Seriously, though... reminds me of The Secret History by Donna Tartt, which starts out with a murder, telling you exactly when, where, how, and who.

      It's not a whodunnit. You know whodunnit. The book is about whydunnit.

    3. Re:So what if you knew who's gonna die? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Colombo even tells you exactly "whydunnit". It's still funny to watch it resolve.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's not copyright infringement after, then it can't be copyright infringement before. Case closed.

  36. fight back as if they can win this and then hollyw by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    fight back as if they can win this and then Hollywood can pull the same BS to stop bad movie reviews

  37. Foolish way to deal with the problem. by Zxern · · Score: 1

    Fools Just feed a different false spoiler to several different sites and your problem i solved.

  38. Inapplicable by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    It is my understanding that this applies to fair use as a limit on how much you can DIRECTLY COPY of a work. Describing the plot is not the same as quoting the plot's most interesting dialog to the point of spoiling it.

    --
    Good-bye
    1. Re:Inapplicable by Almahtar · · Score: 1

      The wikipedia article on derived works says that things even as derivative as translations are protected under fair use. One could argue that these spoilers are a translation of the work into the author's own terms. Unless there is a substantial amount of information copied from the transcript or some copyrighted, released work this should be a derived work protected under fair use. (I'm not a lawyer, blah)

  39. Major Spoiler Alert !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everyone dies! everyone always dies.

  40. Re:Apparently at AMC "IP" stands for Idiot Pinhead by turp182 · · Score: 1

    Finish Breaking Bad. Best show ever. I watched all 5 seasons in two weeks once, using my time very effectively and to good use (the end is perfect, as is the song at the end).

    Best show ever. I never expected the father in Malcolm in the Middle to be that good of an actor.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  41. Easy solution by Cheviot · · Score: 1

    Then they shouldn't post a spoiler. Their whole front page should just be one character's name in a huge font.

    Surely that cannot be a spoiler, regardless if that character happens to die in the finale.

  42. Just post it everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So just start posting it anonymously all the hell over the place. It's not like the series is any good anymore anyway. It's amazing that "they" never learn; The single best way to make sure something gets read/seen/heard is to attempt to suppress it...

  43. I never do this, but mod this up please! by Almahtar · · Score: 1

    I'd gladly undo my previous posts in this thread to mod you up. That would be a very funny solution to the problem.

  44. If Hobbits live on Endor, you must acquit by tepples · · Score: 1

    Not only Ewoks but also Hobbits live on Endor.

    1. Re:If Hobbits live on Endor, you must acquit by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The ship sinks.

  45. Walking Dead Died after season 1... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It turned into a zombie turd of a show.

  46. You forgot that movie! by antdude · · Score: 1

    Don't forget they did get off the island, but they ended back on the island!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  47. not caring by luther349 · · Score: 0

    the shows been dead for a wile now. .

  48. So by m76 · · Score: 1

    Damn those meteorologists constantly infringing on weather's copyright.

  49. X actor unemployed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... instead of saying "X character dies" we could say "X actor is (or will be) unemployed" :v

  50. Copyright infringement for revealing plot points? by Kinwolf · · Score: 1

    So, Wikipedia could be sued for all those books and movies entries that describes the plot? All those reviews online and on tv could also be sued when they reveal anything about the plot? Pleeaaaaassse AMC. What complete FUD

  51. I feel like I'm from another planet by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    I care so little about this stuff that I made a post to comment on it, lol. :)

    Seriously, all this television-psychosis and social media masturbation seems so alien to me and so far removed from my life that it's kind of sobering to see how much other people care about it. And if that's your thing, have at it, more power to ya. It just shows me how my interests differ so widely from the general population, I guess. I'm not against it, I just feel like an outsider observing a foreign culture with weird, unfamiliar rituals and ceremonies.

    Anyway, carry on, and enjoy.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  52. but Cliffnotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would mean the perennial favorite 'cliff notes' are unlawful?

  53. Comics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this a spoiler when this was already a scene - plot in the comic ? Send the "law firm" the comic issue.