Slashdot Mirror


Rolls-Royce Unveils First Driverless Car Complete With Silk 'Throne' (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Rolls-Royce has unveiled its first driverless vehicle dubbed The Vision Next 100. It is an autonomous vehicle aimed at "the most discerning and powerful patrons in the world." There's no steering wheel but there is a silk "throne" where passengers can sit and stare out the window. Rolls-Royce said the zero-emission model, codenamed 103EX, showed the company "rejects the notion of anonymous, utilitarian and bland future modes of mobility." The owner will be "encircled by the most modern handcrafted fine-line Macassar wood panelling" as they gaze at a "generous" high-definition television display. In addition to the "finest one-off deep-pile ivory wool carpet," the vehicle features a virtual assistant named Eleanor, inspired after the actor Eleanor Thornton. It will be able to remind users about meetings; it will even bring the car around to the front of the owner's house at the start of a journey. "As the Rolls-Royce Vision Next 100 gracefully comes to a halt, something magnificent occurs," the company said. The glass roof rises to allow the occupant to stand, while a step emerges from below the running board and a red light is projected, "carpet-like" to announce their arrival. Rolls-Royce did not say how the vehicle would be powered or how much it costs, but it did say it's due to hit the streets in the 2040s. You can watch a 360-degree video of the 103EX the company posted on YouTube.

105 comments

  1. Smart or not... by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...thats one fucking ugly car right there.

    1. Re:Smart or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is ugly and impractical. Look at how low the wheel covers go. You wouldn't be able to go over the slightest bump or incline in that piece of shit.

      Also the story lies when it says there is no steering wheel. From the interior picture, you can clearly see a steering wheel.

    2. Re:Smart or not... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Rich people don't use roads that have bumps in them.

    3. Re:Smart or not... by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      "Concept car"... the final car (if there is one) will take styling cues from this but will also be fit for actual use.

    4. Re:Smart or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess if they only want to drive up and down the roads in their gated communities then it will work. Seems kind of pointless though.

    5. Re:Smart or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to say that about the steering wheel. Glad someone else read the article before me.

    6. Re:Smart or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just threw up in my mouth a little...

    7. Re:Smart or not... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      ...thats one fucking ugly car right there.

      Also, I'm not sure the Flintstone-style square wheels are a terribly good idea. Surely they'll make the ride a bit bumpy?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    8. Re:Smart or not... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Yep. How does the damn thing turn anyway?

    9. Re:Smart or not... by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Rich people don't use roads that have bumps in them.

      You have never been to Great Britain, have you?
      Manors tend to be at the top of hills. Away from the town centres, serviced by twisty country roads where parts might not even be paved. Or at least not this century. As for the town centres, potholes and sleeping policemen (speed bumps) galore!

      Many of the luxury cars have been prized not only for a strong engine that lets the car accelerate effortlessly without sounding like a strangled mule, but ability to shield the occupants from the variable road conditions. If you wanted a smooth, quiet ride, RR was once king.
      Now... not so much so. Never mind that the interior looks like a gilded BMW i3. This is one concept car that should never make it past concept, and I doubt it will.

    10. Re:Smart or not... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      The article put the wrong picture in there. Notice it does say Next 1000 in there. BMW (the parent company), is planning a
      Mini Copper Next 1000
      BMW Next 1000
      Rolls Royce Next 1000

      The BMW next 1000 which is supposed to have a removable steering wheel, but still that picture isn't quite right, I'm not sure where its from but the RR next 1000 that is not.

    11. Re:Smart or not... by Black+LED · · Score: 1

      All I can think of is HUDSON.

  2. 2040s?!? by burtosis · · Score: 2

    Typically when it's technically infeasible it's 5 years out. Apparently this is at least 5 times that.

    1. Re: 2040s?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, at least consult the chart before posting...

      Clearly what they're suggesting is that a self-driving throne-car has not been proven conclusively impossible.

    2. Re: 2040s?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll never be release . Even if it is ever released. It'll never compete with any major market. Just like everything they have ever produced. It's a luxury items meant for an extremely small subset of the population. Not even most of the 1%ers can truly afford a Rolls Royse. Why is this on /. Anyway. It's not tech or geek unless you're into ultra expensive over priced cars. Just because they think they can create a self driving car why would they? Most of the people who own a rolls don't even drive the damn things. They have people for that....

    3. Re:2040s?!? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They are worryingly far behind, aren't they? Tesla already has a zero emission car with autopilot. Nissan is supposed to be releasing their basic autopilot this year, although they say it will be at least 2018 before they can do what Tesla does today. And of course Nissan have a zero emission car too.

      I guess RR think they don't have to compete on features because they compete on bling instead.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:2040s?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a zero LOCAL emission car with BETA VERSION autopilot.

      FTFY.

    5. Re: 2040s?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla is a fucking joke. Once the proper car manufacturers come out to play the Tesla will be relegated to the garbage bin of history.

      Americans cannot make cars. Period. No US manufacturer can hold a candle to a Japanese car, let alone a European.

      Teslas value is in getting the whole ball rolling. For that they are to be commended, but there life expectancy as a brand is about a year after BMW, VW, Toyota, Volvo, Nissan etc start churning their cars out.

    6. Re: 2040s?!? by Traxton1 · · Score: 1

      You appeared to reference the XKCD about this, but somehow forgot to link it.

      https://xkcd.com/678/

  3. You could... by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can watch a 360-degree video of the 103EX the company posted on YouTube.

    I could, but the three views I've already seen have caused my eyes to bleed. That is one butt-ugly car. The only way I can rationalize it being a Rolls Royce is that they are so dead set against self driving cars, that they produced this turd-wash to make people gag on the concept of self drive from now on.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  4. Needs some... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corinthian leather.

  5. Trump 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You know what needs to be done.

    1. Re:Trump 2016 by zenlessyank · · Score: 0

      Fuck off.

    2. Re:Trump 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, fascists need to be stopped.
      I thought we all agreed that fascism is unacceptable in the 40s, but the Trump supporters seem to disagree.

    3. Re: Trump 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think you understand what facism is

    4. Re:Trump 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that post when Hillary will attack Russia and people around you will start to melt.

  6. Throne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see a toilet paper holder anywhere.

    1. Re: Throne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foolish peasant, one does not wipe one's own arse whilst ascendant upon yon thronecar.

    2. Re: Throne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the function of the Lord of the Privvy.

  7. It will not just be the first ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    It will also be the last.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:It will not just be the first ... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      And that's still one too many.

  8. Fucking Ugly As Sin by zenlessyank · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Holy shit that looks retarded. See what happens when HR works in the design department?? Someone HAS to get fired for this. I'm throwing rocks at it if I see one.

    1. Re:Fucking Ugly As Sin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Release in the 2040's? It's obviously a joke. And a bad one. And if it's not--it's so ugly it makes me angry. LOL

    2. Re:Fucking Ugly As Sin by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I love how the roof opens so that the occupant can stand up, making it easier for onlookers to hit them with rotten fruit.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  9. Re:Early post by zenlessyank · · Score: 0

    Eat shit.

  10. Fiat Rolls Royce Elizondo Camacho? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's good to dream. If they're planning 2040 they're going to have to do better.

    Can you imagine what "futuristic" tech was designed 24 years ago? That's 1992. No public Internet. No smartphones. No Windows 95, no PC in every home (let alone one per person). Anyone "imagining technology" back then was missing -new-concepts- yet to be created that revolutionized everything.

    I would bet by 2040 Rolls Royce will be a division of FIat, and their cars won't be a simple cabin on 4 wheels. For goodness sake, instead of an infotainment system they have a stuffy British gal who can "tell you your schedule." Royalty, effete snobs, people who drown in silk luxury, and the rest don't have a "schedule".

    It's making them get some PR buzz and marketing so good on them. Otherwise this is suitable for April 1st.

    E

    1. Re:Fiat Rolls Royce Elizondo Camacho? by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      24 years ago? That's 1992. No public Internet. No smartphones. No Windows 95 .....

      Ruined my keyboard when I got to "No Windows 95". A good reminder of how tech can go downhill as well as up..

  11. Imagine the repair bill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the repair bill if that car ever hit a pothole. It looks like it has maybe 3" clearance from the road. Are they thinking that the people rich enough to buy it will only drive on newly paved roads? Of course this is just a concept car that will never actually make it to market. I guess they can throw common sense and practicality to the wind since their only real objective is to get press coverage.

    1. Re:Imagine the repair bill... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Roads? Where Rolls Royce is going they don't need roads.

      Or designers, for that matter.

    2. Re:Imagine the repair bill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who can afford this won't blink an eye at buying $10k bottles of wine to drink never mind the "minor" repair bill for their slumming 6th most expensive car from their fleet.

    3. Re:Imagine the repair bill... by war4peace · · Score: 2

      When I saw that car I immediately thought of pimps and African country tyrants, maybe with a couple of Arab sheikhs thrown in the mix.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:Imagine the repair bill... by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      When I saw that car I immediately thought of pimps and African country tyrants

      And the guy in the video backs that up.

  12. And the joke... by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "due to hit the streets in the 2040s."

    Ah, there's the joke. They're bringing this out long after every other car manufacturer will already be selling autonomous cars. They're promoting their vintage car. By the time it comes out it will be old tech.

    1. Re:And the joke... by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      With that lack of clearance it's literally going to be hitting the streets.

    2. Re:And the joke... by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      With that lack of clearance it's literally going to be hitting the streets.

      I came here to point that out. There's almost zero clearance, and none of the four tires can change direction; this car design can only go forwards and backwards in a straight line.

      I agree with the idea that this is some sort of rich-person joke.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
  13. they need a new marketing arm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never mind that it's about the ugliest vehicle you could imagine, or that it would be utterly incapable of traversing normal roads in that form.

    The ad copy reads like an April fool's joke. They seriously need to fire that ad agency. "Thus, as in Botticelli’s ‘Birth of Venus’, our guest is framed and ready to step gracefully into the limelight and greet their audience..." Or the ever popular, "...contemplate the majesty of the stars in the firmament above as they glide through the night”. Really now?

  14. Fit for a future dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    “the most discerning and powerful patrons in the world” Really? Don't forget the bulletproof glass and armor plating for when plebeian rabble decides to become brave.

    There's only around 125000 ultra high net worth individuals (50 million USD+) around the world and I wonder how many of them are crass enough for this.

  15. silk? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    if it doesn't have fine corinthian leather seats I don't want it.

  16. The caption says, "butt-ugly". by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    That it is.

    The Homer looks much better

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  17. It's a turd with fins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like a turd with a 57 chevy fintail.

  18. okay I give up... by darkitecture · · Score: 1

    okay, I give up.

    The summary says it doesn't have a steering wheel. The picture in the linked article shows a steering wheel. What?

    1. Re:okay I give up... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      That's not a steering wheel. It's a directional hoop.

    2. Re:okay I give up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's no steering wheel. It's simply their patented circumferal yaw control interface.

    3. Re:okay I give up... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's the wheel for your hamster.

  19. Who was it that took over Rolls? by jcr · · Score: 1

    That is one butt-ugly car. Rolls and Royce would be spinning in their graves if they saw that.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Who was it that took over Rolls? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      The designers obviously had today's Minecraft players in mind when they designed the thing.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  20. A car with a toilet - NICE! by rdelsambuco · · Score: 1

    Can take a dump whenever, since you don't have to pay attention to the road. No info on how big the holding tank is, so range might be limited if you bring a lot of snacks on a trip.

    --
    I comment occasionally so that I can mod others -1 overrated or -1 offtopic.
  21. No Steering Wheel? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

    Sure looks like one in that second picture! Or is that a scroll wheel because it's too far away for a touch screen?

  22. Steering Wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm confused.

    "It has no steering wheel ..."

    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/9355a5e76ae5b80400d602329cabef5eec84aac1/0_0_5616_3744/master/5616.jpg?w=620&q=20&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&dpr=2&s=4a9dda96d71e3d37277c0dd7eb07c938

  23. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing but the hand crafted leather of a Kobe grade cattle using finest natural dyes crushed from a endangered beetle by a enslaved Indonesian boy forced to work 14 hours everyday. Tanning process involves child molesting monks of Ibiza with tears of 13 year old boys as the special ingredient. Lastly the leather is hand stitched by bearded hipsters in Portland.

    1. Re:blah by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yeah a commercial with Ricardo Montalban's voice saying that would be awesome.

    2. Re:blah by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I don't think the recording would be awesome as much as the fact that you brought him back from the dead to do the recording.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:blah by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      the tech has existed for a while to assemble sentences from sufficient collection of recorded phonemes; with Montalban's film and television works from 1941-2009 I'd think all the building blocks should be there for building any sentence in two languages!

  24. LOLWUT? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rolls-Royce said the zero-emission model, codenamed 103EX, showed the company "rejects the notion of anonymous, utilitarian and bland future modes of mobility."

    While the outside might be flashy, that's the most bland, boring interior I've ever seen in a concept car. That interior looks like it belongs in a sub-$2000 car for some emerging market.

    1. Re:LOLWUT? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The interior is designed for only one purpose. Which is strange because silk stains so easily.

    2. Re:LOLWUT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interior is designed for only one purpose. Which is strange because silk stains so easily.

      But just like a certain blue dress, if it gets stained you simply buy another one. Whazz the prob?

  25. Video Link by labnet · · Score: 2

    A link for the lazy.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    This car rocks.You computer nerds have no style!

    --
    46137
    1. Re:Video Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the lady is hot, as long as I don't have to look at the car.

  26. old fuddy by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    In my mind I could see a Rolls Royce engineer compiling that video on a 20 year old supercomputer equivalent to a modern workstation and not noticing the low quality and frame rate because the computer was usually used to design cars. In the background a hastily gathered panel of 50 year old futurists talking to an artist and turning out retrofuture concepts at a rapid clip.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  27. Satire? by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

    I honestly can't tell if this is a satire piece ore not.

    1. Re:Satire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The "The owner will be "encircled by the most modern handcrafted fine-line Macassar wood panelling" as they gaze at a "generous" high-definition television display. In addition to the "finest one-off deep-pile ivory wool carpet,"" sounds so Trumptastic.

    2. Re:Satire? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Indeed. The "The owner will be "encircled by the most modern handcrafted fine-line Macassar wood panelling" as they gaze at a "generous" high-definition television display. In addition to the "finest one-off deep-pile ivory wool carpet,"" sounds so Trumptastic.

      Oh, you are absolutely correct. You've figured it out.

      It's the Trumpmobile. When he is president, he's going order four of them.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  28. Haute Couture by Spasmodeus · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that a lot of concept cars are created in the same way high fashion is: Create the most absurd, hideous, impractical thing currently imaginable, a thing which wouldn't survive a single day in actual use, then use pretentious jibber-jabber to convince people with more money than sense that it's something they should actually want.

  29. Three thoughts.. by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    1. Suddenly the Citroen DS-19 seems drop-dead gorgeous.

    Hm. On reflection, the older I get, the prettier the DS gets. I may even wind up getting one.. one day.

    2. Silk?! SILK?! REAL cars use leather, always have, always will!

    3. Did RR crib that design from the back of a third-grader's notebook?

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Three thoughts.. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      1. Suddenly the Citroen DS-19 seems drop-dead gorgeous.

      Hm. On reflection, the older I get, the prettier the DS gets. I may even wind up getting one.. one day.

      Or go one step up.

      (Another interesting late-60's-to-early-70's model, although, alas, that one didn't make it into production. Non-Mazda rotary engine, though, so caveat emptor - not that you'll ever be able to buy one of the remaining ones from Daimler-Benz.

      And as long as we're talking about Citroens and Wankels....)

    2. Re:Three thoughts.. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      And as long as we're talking about Citroens and Wankels....)

      Slashdot Unicode non-support + Wikipedia Unicode characters in URLs = suck.

      Try this, instead.

  30. The Homer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost looks like they stole the idea from Fox. Just with the edges rounded to get around copyright violations:
    https://youtu.be/Pw9gaEiQAxY?t=8s

  31. Too BoatyMcFacey and Open by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks too much like a boat inside. Rolls-Royce is like a private club or residence, safe place to retreat from the pressures and threats of the world. A too clinical and open interior fails to deliver this feeling. The actual implementation of the idea might have to have more space for client protection features, although the high rising roof door is a cover as it is.

  32. Already a division of Volkswagen and BMW by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > I would bet by 2040 Rolls Royce will be a division of Fiat

    The Rolls Royce company was sold to Volkswagen a long time ago. They also bought Bentley. Later, the Rolls Royce brand name was sold to BMW. So what was Rolls Royce is now part of Volkswagen, making cars branded Bentley.

    Cars with the Rolls Royce brand are made by BMW, and there's no relation to the original RR company other than the name.

  33. Correction: Bentley was Rolls since 1946 by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Correcting myself. I said "they also bought Bentley." In fact, RR bought Bentley back in the 1940s, and they produced virtually identical cars with both namesplates. When VW bought the RR company, the Bentley brand was included. The RR brand name, however, was sold to BMW, who had been making the engines for RR cars.

  34. This seems worthless to its target market. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    Anyone that can afford this shit needs a manual drive option for when they need to get away from rioters or assassins.

  35. disagree. its nice by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

    Its way nicer than the trend in round cars that goes back to the early 90s. Its got a bunch of sharp lines, looks like something from batman or a cylon. I really love the look. I always did want a catamaran though.

    Its simply too bad it will cost more than i will make in a lifetime.

    --
    -
    1. Re:disagree. its nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would any sane person want such a butt-ugly piece of shit? Oh, never mind you have an account at slashdot.

  36. The ad looks like it's for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a Reynholm Industries product. -T

  37. Look at the renderings. This has to be a joke. by chebeba · · Score: 0

    The 3D rendering has the work quality I would expect from a 1st year multimedia student that had his parents choose his line of education for him.
    As in, he is not even interested.

    If it is impossible that a company like RR puts out something like this, I would sell my shares... (If I had any)

  38. Meaningless lusury by jandersen · · Score: 1

    I have to admit, I couldn't be bothered to actually get informed about this new gadget; to me, a car is only ever going to be a tool, and I want to be able to load mine up with useful things like sand, stones, manure and so on. Silk thrones doesn't seem to fit the bill, although I have no experience with using silk in my car.

    That said, Rolls Royces are impressive machines. I once drove beside one on the motorway at around 80 mph and thought, that looked very comfortable and rather sedate. When I looked back a few seconds later, it had gone - I could see it visibly red-shifted in the distance. Apparently they come with 8-liter engines.

  39. Not quite a throne. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Rolls-Royce has unveiled its first driverless vehicle dubbed The Vision Next 100. It is an autonomous vehicle aimed at "the most discerning and powerful patrons in the world." There's no steering wheel but there is a silk "throne" where passengers can sit and stare out the window.

    Second picture on the article shows a center-mounted front seat that look like some crap 1960's "space age" design, nothing royal, and a there most certainly is a steering wheel.

  40. Be Local, Think Global by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not going to comment on the vehicle's design, which pretty much speaks for itself. What's interesting is that Bavarian cowboy leaning onto it as if it were his.

  41. Looks like they understand their target market... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    With such repugnant phrases such as these:

    “ivory-coloured luxurious throne upon which our passengers are conveyed, and from which they command”.

    “the powerful have always understood the symbols through which they express their standing”

    Ah yes, that'll be the psychopaths who sacrifice everything and everyone to get power and money, then...
    Too bad that we keep electing them.

  42. It looks like a post-modern rework of a 20's car. by waspleg · · Score: 1

    Which makes sense as this is an even more gilded age.

  43. Sounds like the "Architect Sketch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The owner will be "encircled by the most modern handcrafted fine-line Macassar wood panelling" as they gaze at a "generous" high-definition television display. In addition to the "finest one-off deep-pile ivory wool carpet,"

    I expected this to be followed by:
    Client 1: Did you say 'knives'?
    Mr. Wiggin: Rotating knives, yes.

  44. I'm disappointed... by zarmanto · · Score: 1

    What, no fine Corinthian leather?

  45. Oh please by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Rolls-Royce did not say how the vehicle would be powered or how much it costs, but it did say it's due to hit the streets in the 2040s."

    1) It'll cost more than any mere mortal could possibly afford, and

    2) It'l never see the light of day. A 25-year lead time on ANYTHING means it'll never be built and and never come to fruition. FFS, Hoover Dam, the Moon landing, and the Manhattan Project combined didn't take 25 years.

    3) Rolls-Royce is just jerking us off with this bullshit. They might have just as well announced that they're planning a Start Trek-style transporter beam with built-in blowjobs.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  46. brainfart by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    "The Vision Next 100 – the brainchild of Giles Taylor"
    Must have ment brainFART.

  47. Thinking small by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    Why not complement the throne with holographic projections of four Nubian slaves bearing the thing?

  48. Holy fail by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    Not only is that thing ugly AF, the design makes 0 sense... it looks like they just copied and pasted a bunch of parts from other vehicles into this. And even the inside is ugly and non-functional. Those back seats are way too close to the front seats, too. Uncomfortable to look at, uncomfortable to use.

  49. My favorite part(s) of this article : by nult · · Score: 1

    " One critic described the Vision Next 100 as ‘butt-ugly’. " hahaha Also, they say it has "no steering wheel" but clearly, it has a steering wheel, unless that is some sort of new concept chair for rich folks ass*s.

  50. Doom. by kheldan · · Score: 1

    The owner will be "encircled by the most modern handcrafted fine-line Macassar wood panelling"..

    ..as they careen at high speed into a concrete abutment and die horribly, when the so-called 'autonomous' system fucks up so badly that nothing can save you, yet you have no controls whatsoever with which to save yourself. Nicely done, Rolls-Royce.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  51. Why reinvent the wheel (or the whole car)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should've just contacted the Gerry Anderson estate about licensing the body styling of the FAB 1 from "Thunderbirds Are Go!" (Snarky ex-con chauffeur/bodyguard is optional.)

  52. Vapor car is vapor by Drewdad · · Score: 1

    "Your grand entrance on the red carpet of light."

    Really? Who the eff writes this drivel?

    Might as well read, "drive this and display your flaming narcissism for all to see!"

  53. Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugly car alert.

  54. Well that's going to be a bumpy ride! by gizmo2199 · · Score: 1

    This car has maybe 3" of clearance off the ground. i could see it easily getting stuck pulling in to a parking lot.

    --
    This Sig does not Exist.
  55. Even better Luxury Transport by Residentcur · · Score: 1