Religious Hacker Defaces 111 Escort Sites (softpedia.com)
An anonymous reader shares this article from Softpedia:
A religiously-motivated Moroccan hacker has defaced 111 different web sites promoting escort services since last summer as part of an ongoing protest against the industry. "In January, the hacker defaced 79 escort websites," writes Softpedia. "His actions didn't go unnoticed, and on some online forums where escorts and webmasters of these websites met, his name was brought up in discussions and used to drive each other in implementing better Web security. While some webmasters did their job, some didn't. During the past days, the hacker has been busy defacing a new set of escort websites... Most of these websites bare ElSurveillance's defacement message even today... Most of the websites are from the UK."
His newest round of attacks replace the sites with a pro-Palestine message and a quote from the quran, though in January Softpedia reported the attacker was also stealing data from some of the sites about their users' accounts.
His newest round of attacks replace the sites with a pro-Palestine message and a quote from the quran, though in January Softpedia reported the attacker was also stealing data from some of the sites about their users' accounts.
Fucking loser; probably jerks off to illegal Saudi ankle porn...
At least he didn't shoot anyone.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Why do I almost hope that the hacker in question has already managed to hack this Slashdot story, replacing "bear" with "bare" just for shits and giggles?
Probably couldn't get any refunds and got tired of his negative Yelp reviews being ignored.
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
Hmmm, we have the words "Moroccan," "Quran," "religious," "pro-Palestine" . . . something seems to be missing ..
I'm not
Sure if something was
Left out of the story.
All I know is something seems to be
Missing from the discussion.
I wonder if there is a reason for the abstraction and missing element? I'm pretty sure if the hacker was Christian that would have been mentioned.
much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
I consider it off topic.
Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
Here is my favorite escort site. I hope this hacker doesn't mess it up.
http://www.feoa.net/
You are welcome on my lawn.
Infidels are not human, by definition. So there is no agenda - there is no "crime".
It really doesn't matter. Too much religion of any flavor is a bad thing. I leave it to you to define "too much". My definition is "any".
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
Not sure how having sex is destructive to your body, but whatever justification works I suppose...
Too much religion of any flavor is a bad thing.
Agreed. Poor Spock... too much LDS in the 60's...
Maybe it's just me, but I'd guess that guys who are buying hookers off the internet probably aren't all that involved in international politics.
In other words, they couldn't care less and Joe Hacker has been wasting his time preaching to an audience that's completely uncaring.
I mean, how many guys who see his defacement are going to jump up and go, "Damn, I was gonna book a date with Trixie Tightbottom tonight, but instead I think I'll go protest at the Israeli Embassy!"
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
I used to think a certain religion was pretty strict about sexual matters. Very serious about adultery and things like that. Then I discovered "mutah". This is a religiously sanctioned allowance for "temporary wives". Let's say you're on vacation... Sleeping with a prostitute, escort or some random woman would be wrong. However, if you get a temporary wife, complete with payment and contract... You can do all the usual stuff you do with your wife and it's all good!
There is however strict laws about the women involved in this... We must not consider them prostitutes, after all, Mohammed himself did this so it must be proper and holy. (This is why both sects accept the practice to this day) For example, they cannot have vaginal sex with 2 different men within a week of each other... After all, they must grieve one husband before the next. But....... There's a loophole there. Mutah who want to earn more $$ with more frequent husbands can limit her activities to non-vaginal activities and skip the waiting period.
So I used to think a certain religion was very pious about marital fidelity and prohibited promiscuity and prostitution among it's members, then I learned about mutah.
Why hasn't this man? Did he deface mutahmatch.com?
Mutah is prostitution. Mutah is adultery.
(Apologies to those who only use mutah to cook their dinners and iron their clothes)
Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
Do you seriously not know why that wouldn't be considered hate speech?
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
Why isn't there more mention of whatever religion this person might be practicing?
Is he a Quaker, or perhaps an Episcopalian??
How would you know? I wouldn't be surprised if the Fred Phelps clan and the Westboro Baptist Church were actively searching for nukes to take out Las Vegas. Really, NYC, LA, or any other major metropolis either.
And all this time I thought Nimoy was Jewish...I had no Idea he was Mormon!
Rent-A-Rash Cunt Market??!! Say it isn't so!
>>Westboro Baptist Church
Oh, please! Get a better boogeyman, would you, huh? If you "wouldn't be surprised" then you really don't know much about Westboro's theology, and if you would equate the "threat" from Westboro with the very real existential threat of radical Islam, then you don't know much about Islamic theology, either.
But it's the internet, so please, express your opinion. Everyone is a Winner, after all...
"Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home" reference.
I expect to get modded out of existence but here it goes:
True, however the churches that claim to follow Christ (Matthew 24:4, 5; 10-12) share blame and guilt for the atrocities committed by the state by involving themselves in politics, promoting nationalism and advocating violent wars against even fellow believers rather than; telling everyone that these things are wrong, looking to the kingdom of God (Daniel 2:44, Matthew 6:10, 33) to solve mankind's problems and teaching the political neutrality (John 18:36) and brotherly love (John 13:34, 35) that Christ taught.
You're confusing atheism with politics.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
Be somewhat fair to them. Scum they may be, but they have never been violent scum. Not once, and it must take a lot of self-control to remain calm in the face of the reactions they incite.
"Mutah" is not permitted in Islam, not sure where you got that from.
In fact it was banned by Prophet Muhammad, after the lewdness that the pagans and idol/people worshippers used to spread.
It's only the Shia (minority) sect which allow this.
In Islam, God has permitted and even encouraged sex between a husband and wife to increase love and bond within a matrimonial trust, just like Christianity and Judaism.
And yes, sex outside of marriage is a very serious and sick sin as it potentially destroys not only families, but an entire society due to illegitimate children. And children who have no father and mothers are generally worse off in education, health, and society; especially children without father-figures.
Where Islam differs is that God has placed a ban on men to only have ONE wife.
However, as God knows the nature of men and their temptations, God has however permitted more than one wife ONLY in the condition he can bear the financial responsibility and offer safety and equal time to both wives. i.e. to curb prostitution and mistresses; and to help divorced/widowed women (especially with children) who find it difficult to find a husband, etc.
And I also want to clarify that there is not a single Islamic scholar who hasn't spoken against the barbaric, terrorist group ISIS and the corruption they are spreading. In fact, Islamic scholars and imaams have received death threats from ISIS.
Stalin was an orthodox christian seminarist and would have been a priest, if he had the money for higher education. So much for that.
"It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
No, the purge was motivated by the unwillingness to share power. You see, until 1917 Russia has been an absolutist monarchy - the last one in Europe. In an absolutist monarchy the church plays a huge role - the monarch is appointed by the god after all. Russian orthodox church had money, land and a shitload of followers, hence it had to be, as they call it nowadays, "rightsized". Stalin wasn't a Russian, but a Georgian and he spared the churches and clergy in Georgia.
So, the notion that Stalin was an atheist is wrong, as is the notion that his purges of the Russian orthodox church was anything else but a power game.
I have no idea whence you got that. I am an atheist myself, always have been.
"It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
What is this "hate speech" you talk of? is it simply speech you personally find offensive? many here find Islam and its associated Sharia hideously offensive, yet we don't call it "hate speech". Free Speech is not about speech we don't like, but about the things we don't like - and especially about thinks that powerful political people and ideologies don't like.
Claiming something is "hate speech" is merely a tactic that the powerful use to CENSOR speech, *especially* uncomfortably true speech, that they don't like.
A George Carlin brilliantly said, "Political Correctness is fascism dressed up as politeness". Please don't advance fascism by replicating its censorious memes.
Anonymous does?
Best Slashdot Co
"A religiously-motivated Moroccan"
Pleonasm.
If the hacker were an Earth Firster defacing the web sites of Exxon and Halliburton, I have to believe the response would not be quite the same, and that many progressives would instead be cheering him on.
The purges were motivated by the FACT that the clergy were using their pulpits to preach against him. So he decided to kill most of the clergy and put a stop to it. It had nothing to do with religion and everything to do with securing his power.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
I have nothing against prostitutes or prostitution, and to spell it out for you, I think prostitution should be completely legal.
In other words, what's your point?
Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
Interestingly enough, at the time, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the two cities with the largest Christian population in Japan.
The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
What religion? Devil worshiper? Money worshiper? Hindu? Christian? What if that Muslim were an atheist who also did it because he hated hookers?
I swear, you FSM worshipers are worse fanatics than an Alabama Christian evangelist.
Fools, all. BTW, Christians consider the guy's actions sinful.
Free Martian Whores!
By "at the time" I assume you mean just before rather than just after.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Where is his sense of culture? He should have done 101.
Tritium
He wasn't killing them because of their religion. He wasn't killing them because of his either.
He was killing them because they were (from his POV) political adversaries and subversives. Had they stayed out of Caesar's domain he might not have bothered.
Causality and coincidence.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Dude, it's useless to argue with morons. Let him have his little fantasy that all atheists are mass murderers. He's probably the kind of person who thinks that because all firs are conifers and all conifers are trees, therefore all trees must be firs.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
The dead don't preach. Logic fail.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
Hate Speech is speech that keeps a minority group down. It's not about being offensive, it actually causes harm.
So the definition of hate speech has nothing to do with accuracy, truth, or facts. How very useful to anyone trying to control the marketplace of ideas.