EFF Delivers 210,000 Signatures Opposing Trans-Pacific Partnership (eff.org)
An anonymous Slashdot reader writes:
"The TPP is simply bad for tech users and innovators," writes the Electronic Frontier Foundation, arguing the proposed trade agreement for the Pacific Rim "exports the most onerous parts of U.S. copyright law and prevents the U.S. from improving them in the future, while failing to include the balancing provisions that work for users and innovators, such as fair use." At a press conference, the EFF delivered 210,000 signatures gathered in conjunction with other activist groups "to call on Democratic Party Leader Nancy Pelosi to stop the Trans-Pacific Partnership from going to a vote during the 'lame duck' session of Congress following the November election."
More signatures are still being collected online, to be delivered on July 21. In a statement, the EFF adds that the TPP also "does nothing to safeguard the free and open Internet, by including phony provisions on net neutrality and encryption, trade secrets provisions that carry no exceptions for journalism or whistleblowing, and a simplistic ban on data localization...to buy off big tech."
More signatures are still being collected online, to be delivered on July 21. In a statement, the EFF adds that the TPP also "does nothing to safeguard the free and open Internet, by including phony provisions on net neutrality and encryption, trade secrets provisions that carry no exceptions for journalism or whistleblowing, and a simplistic ban on data localization...to buy off big tech."
Sure the TPP is wrong and evil, but Disney and others in Hollywood want it and have bought our political leaders, so it is going to happen.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
This is not only a Democratic pillar, as your conservative candidate may also oppose this rendition of the treaty.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
Now that that pesky democracy thing has been nipped in the bud, the Democratic party is doing the right thing. Supporting their masters....
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/...
Trump is the Iron Fist. Clinton is the Iron Fist in the velvet glove. I'm voting Trump, at least he honest about who he is.
putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
Just go vote.
Both Donald and Hillary oppose TPP. Gary and Jill also oppose it. Nobody running is for it.
Now that that pesky democracy thing has been nipped in the bud
People keep saying this and I really, really don't understand it. Donald Trump's nomination - in the face of implacable opposition from nearly every major Republican officeholder, megabucks donor and deep pocketed SuperPAC - is proof that democracy is alive and well, in the sense that the guy who got the most votes won. Against all the entrenched elites and gigabucks influencers, the guy who got the majority of votes from our assembled Joe Sixpacks actually got the nomination.
Personally, I believe he's a buffoon and would be a catastrophe as President. (I think Hillary would be awful too but for different reasons.) But how can you say that democracy has been replaced with the politics of oligarchs and moneyed interests has replaced "one person, one vote?" Republican voters voted and got who they asked for. Not liking the results of democracy is one of its hazards.
Oh, and FWIW, both Trump and Clinton oppose the TPP despite the "establishment" of both of their parties supporting it. So there's another reason not to suggest that the Powers That Be will always get their way...
"95% of all Slashdot
Both Donald and Hillary oppose TPP. Gary and Jill also oppose it. Nobody running is for it.
Hillary is on record as supporting it many times. When Sanders gave her more of a fight than she expected then suddenly she was against it. If elected, I fully expect her to go back to her previous position of supporting it. The Clintons are easily (and rather openly) bought. If money is behind it she will find a way to justify it. Much like Bill & NAFTA.
What about this? http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/...
If Hillary opposes it where is she?
putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
our politicians only listen to dollars.
Most people think EFF is for all people, I am Canadian, I was going to donate, but this just proves they are for American interests only, not for interests of Canadians, Europeans, Asians.
Hillary as Sec of State worked to create TTP along with President Obama. And early in the election cycle fully supported it. It was only as Bernie started to cause her problems that she said she was against TTP. This opposition to TTP is only a smoke screen. Once safely in the Oval office she will return to fully supporting TTP. And will be pushing hard for it's passage.
Oh, and FWIW, both Trump and Clinton oppose the TPP
Trump's opposition to these trade deals goes back decades. Hillary's opposition to TPP goes back to when Trump started using it against her a couple months ago; before then she supported it, just like she supports NAFTA, MFN for China, etc., all of which her husband is responsible for. She'll enact TPP as well, after a suitable amount of time has passed and enough spin has been applied.
Hillary opposing TPP is as fake as a three dollar bill and the only people that believe it are her sycophants.
Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
If Hillary opposes the TPP why isn't she supporting Sander's fight on the topic?
putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
I already patented the idea of the "international trade treaty" and trademarked TransPacific Partnershipâ, as well as copyrighting the ©TPP text.
Disney likes there H1B's and with this bill they can use it to wipe any bills that will change the law.
Trump opposing anything is as fake as a three dollar bill. You seriously think he'll do anything to block either TPP or TTP if he's elected? If so, I have an Internet to sell you.
No, Hillary started waffling on the TPP during the Democratic debates. But I didn't find any clear statements against in for a long time after that, and she's one of the authors.
She hasn't be pushing the campaign to take a stand against it. I think she's still in favor of it. I'm likely to vote "Other".
I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
The internet is not yours. I bought it last week.
Vote Trump! It's time to turn the bull loose in the china shop. (you have to say "china" the way Trump does)
It used to be you had to go out knocking on doors to get people to sign your petition. Running the risk of getting the door slammed in your face. Now you just post the thing the thing on a web site where the nay-sayers won't be around to spoil your fun.
Why Nancy Pelosi? It's not her decision what gets a vote in the house, it's Paul Ryan.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Trump is the Iron Fist. Clinton is the Iron Fist in the velvet glove. I'm voting Trump, at least he honest about who he is.
Allow me to quote the average Russian Red Army Soldier in Leningrad in 1941...
"On one side we face an evil, ruthless dictator who will stop at nothing to crush us and get what he wants...
On the other side, we face Hitler, who will stop at nothing and crush us to get what he wants...
I'll pick the one who speaks Russian..."
To get anything actually accomplished, an outsider president must be accompanied by an outsider Congress. Vote for whichever of your local candidates has the least corporate support.
Oh, and FWIW, both Trump and Clinton oppose the TPP despite the "establishment" of both of their parties supporting it. So there's another reason not to suggest that the Powers That Be will always get their way...
Clinton is full of shit, she totally supports the TPP, don't let her lies tell you otherwise...
25 years of her history say it loud and clear, if you bother to listen. 3 months of being against it because of the election doesn't mean crap.
Petitions are meaningless in federal law.
Signatures on nothing mostly, since most are electronic.
Anyone who wants to make this a single issue vote in Nov. really needs to wake up. Most Republicans support it.
If congress doesn't pass it before January, it may never pass. Just because Clinton won't oppose it doesn't mean she'll support it on her watch.
Don't make assumptions.
Stalin spoke Russian? He didn't even lose his horrible Georgian accent when he was drunk, no Russian would consider what he spoke Russian!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
My guess is you weren't alive in the 70's.
I was, and I call bullshit on that article.
_ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
Forgot to mention, a few years after that Ted Danson declared that in 10 years the oceans would be DEAD. All life - gone, because people were whatever.
Oh, and the "Acid Rain" years, where we were destroying the planet - those too.
_ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
Hillary's opposition to TPP goes back to when Trump started using it against her a couple months ago; before then she supported it
Actually, she announced this posture in October of last year.
The truth, of course, is actually quite more nuanced than that, and had little to do with Trump. During her tenure as secretary of state, though, she did her job and represented the view of the administration that was employing her. After leaving that job, in 2014, she started to say she'd reserve judgment until the final deal was announced.
Someone had to do it.
is it so actually so terrible for democracy that both of them will waffle and follow the popular opinion of their constituents?
Depends on how insane or transient popular opinion is... it can swing suddenly to really dumb shit, and then back in a matter of months. Also it is important to have a good grasp of which popular opinions are abandoned once a holder is fully informed, which can be statistically ascertained through focus groups. You don't want a leader who will order lead put into all water supplies because the public got some crazy idea that lead was good for you, and you don't want a leader who lays uncertainty at the feet of the economy by changing policy too rapidly just because the public cannot make up its mind.
Then there's demagoguery, where a preexisting ill-informed popular opinion is pimped into a frenzy by the politician. Or in other words, Trump, who would not be where he is without standing on the shoulders of those who did it before him.
Someone had to do it.
Hillary is *saying* she opposes it. Her history says that she supports it.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
The "most onerous portions of USA copyright law" are tiddlywinks compared to the "most onerous portions" of Japanese copyright law (citation Fuji vs. Jazz Camera, Lexmark vs. Arizona Cartridge Manufacturers). Unfortunately, Japan's interpretation of protecting OEM rights internationally ("e-waste" takeback laws were invented in Japan for reasons having NOTHING to do with environmental destiny and EVERYTHING to do with re-manufacture and reverse-engineering) seems to have metastasized in Asia. EFF is on the right side of this, but pulling TPP's finger from the hole in the dike may result in "the perfect is the enemy of the good", ie if the USA was the strongest proponent to protect copyright - Disney lobbyists aside - then it's speculation whether TPP "could have done more".
I'm not an expert in TPP, or what concessions USA made or even brought to the table to protect USA lobbyists. But I'm above average as expert in the fact that trade is generally anti-protectionism, and protectionism is generally anti-trade, and TPP, NAFTA, TAP, etc. are generally trying to remove barriers. Glad EFF is there, but when I interviewed them about Chinese and Japanese law they said they didn't have enough bandwidth to be experts in that, and since the point of TPP is to leverage Japan vs. China (which despite certain idiot comments is NOT PART OF TPP), we had to find common ground, ie try to compromise with Japan.
Gently reply
You have to look at their motivations.
Hillary's motivation is money and power: she'll do whatever makes her richer, with "donations" to the Clinton Foundation or "speaking fees". She's not going to make more money by vetoing the TPP, but she stands to make a lot of money by passing it.
Trump's motivation so far appears to be feeding his ego, not making money from "speaking fees". I don't see how pissing off all the people who voted for him, and reneging on all his anti-free-trade rhetoric, is going to help him pump up his ego.
Why are the "globalist republican scum" his? He pledged support for Trump. Trump is not a real Republican, that's why he has the GOP in fits. Trump is as much in agreement with the mainline GOP as Bernie is with the mainline DNC.
Chalk it up to different expectations, then. While I'd prefer more honesty from her, I'll take competency and an record that is good on balance.
Someone had to do it.