Slashdot Mirror


Corning Unveils Gorilla Glass 5, Can Survive Drops 'Up To 80% Of The Time' (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via The Verge: Corning has unveiled their new Gorilla Glass 5, which should make its way to high-end smartphones and other electronic devices later this year and into 2017. Gorilla Glass 5 is designed to improve drop performance from devices that are dropped onto rough surfaces from waist heigh to shoulder height. Corning says it can survive up to 80 percent of the time when dropped from 1.6 meters. For comparison, Gorilla Glass 4, which was released in the fall of 2014, was marketed as being twice as tough as the previous version and twice as likely to survive drops onto uneven surfaces from about a meter high. Some things to note include the fact that in Corning's tests, the 80 percent survival rate was with pieces of glass that were 0.6mm thick -- Corning now makes glass as thin as 0.4mm. Depending on how thin manufacturers want the glass in their devices, the durability results may vary. Also, most of demos consisted of dropping the glass face down, rather than on its side or corner. Corning's vice president and general manger John Bayne said if the glass is dropped in such a way, it's going to depend on the overall design of the phone, not just the glass. Gorilla Glass 5 is currently in production, though the company says we'll hear more about it "in the next few months." There's no word as to whether or not the glass will be ready in time for the wave of devices expected this fall.

111 comments

  1. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "For comparison" does not allow you to make a comparison...
    Also what does "up to 80%" mean?

    1. Re:sigh by pinzvidz · · Score: 1

      80% of Newton's Law?

    2. Re:sigh by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      Also what does "up to 80%" mean?

      it means "some value less than, but definitely not greater than, 80%"

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:sigh by aliquis · · Score: 2

      Also what does "up to 80%" mean?

      Altogether it mean that "sometimes it will survive the fall!"

    4. Re:sigh by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Basically it means "on one out of 5 drops, it's guaranteed to break. For the other 4, you may have hope."

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:sigh by Thanshin · · Score: 0

      what does "up to 80%" mean?

      It means it's 80% if you drop it into a royal goose feather pillow. 0% otherwise.

    6. Re:sigh by tysonedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

      80% or the time, it works every time. Obviously.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    7. Re:sigh by ohieaux · · Score: 1

      It means, maybe

      The alternate hypothesis was (rho) < 0.80

      --
      Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.
    8. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, drops of what? Typical glass survives in all practical purposes 100% of the time, when bombarded with raindrops.

    9. Re:sigh by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I expect it means the glass had broke 1 time out of every 5 attempts.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:sigh by Eloking · · Score: 0

      Basically it means "on one out of 5 drops, it's guaranteed to break. For the other 4, you may have hope."

      Do you know what 80% mean? It doesn't mean "1 out of 5 drop is a 100% break chance, and the other 4 out of 5 are 50% break chance".

      Of course, that figure are for 0.6mm and I'm guessing manufacturer will prefer the 0.4mm which, oddly, doesn't have it's how survivability statistic.

      --
      Elok
    11. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that you're a dumbass who doesn't understand probability.

    12. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing there's a significant chance it's more brittle and will not survive an angular fall with a 0.4mm piece of glass.

    13. Re:sigh by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 5, Funny

      it just means that if it breaks on your 1st drop, you can drop it 4 more times without fear.

    14. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't see any info on how it holds up to repeated drops. The 80% rate is for a single drop to a single unit; repeated drops may alter that rate.

    15. Re: sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it means that you're a dumbass who doesn't understand marketing... "You can save up to 30% or more by switching your car insurance to ... wait, who am I recording this bug for today?"

    16. Re:sigh by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I have less optimistic expectations.

      Corning could test samples in batches of 5 sheets. One test, 4 of the samples did not break, 1 did. 80% survival rate as you said you'd expect. Other batches of 5 sheets, all samples broke at a rate less than 80%. As long as all 5 tests don't survive, Corning gets to say that it survives "up to 80%" since it never survived 5 of 5. Weasel words like "up to" are wonderful for marketing.

    17. Re:sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the "up to" part. When you account for that the statement really says, "at a minimum one out of 5 drops is going to break the glass, but usually even more often than that."

    18. Re:sigh by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      It means that the glass survives during the first 80% of the fall. Which mean it is able to stand 0g for at least 0.5s.

    19. Re:sigh by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      The "For comparison" does not allow you to make a comparison...

      twice as tough as the previous version and twice as likely to survive drops onto uneven surfaces from about a meter high.

      Twice as tough compared to the previous version.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  2. Up to percentage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does that mean AT ALL?

    1. Re:Up to percentage? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Generally it means exactly the opposite of what the one saying it wants to convey. Essentially it means "on 20% of the drops, it certainly breaks". That's not really what I want to hear when you're supposed to tell me how rugged your device allegedly is.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. Really bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a really bad idea. Instead of making the glass thicker and tougher, which reduces the touch sensitivity, how about users take some responsibility and take care of their electronic devices? Be careful with your phone and drops should never be a problem. These new versions of gorilla glass are actually making phones worse, because the touch sensitivity is poorer. This is a really bad idea.

    1. Re: Really bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, why not simply research something entirely not glass related?

      People with minimally active lives will drop the thing eventually. Glass is perfect for all but people that need to move.

    2. Re:Really bad idea by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I must be lucky, I guess - never having cracked a phone's screen.

      My current phone has cheap plastic and is an astonishing 2.0mm thicker than an iPhone 6s. So maybe smaller and lighter means more breakage?

    3. Re:Really bad idea by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to disagree. All I know is that my Nokia N900, having survived more than a few drops, is still going strong after 7 years. Yes, there is that spot on the screen where I mistook for an ash tray on night, but it is fully functionally.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    4. Re:Really bad idea by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's why you have to buy a (relatively) substantial protective case if you want your super-thin smartphone to survive the contract period.

      Of course, it's not such a super-slim-and-stylish fashion accessory anymore.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    5. Re: Really bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      plastics tend to get scratches, and if you make them hard enough to avoid scratches, then they break like glass. So yah, they can make it not break, but then your keys would scratch your phone.

  4. Comparability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Corning says it can survive up to 80 percent of the time when dropped from 1.6 meters. For comparison, Gorilla Glass 4, which was released in the fall of 2014, was marketed as being twice as tough as the previous version and twice as likely to survive drops onto uneven surfaces from about a meter high.

    How is that "for comparison"? There is absolutely nothing there that can be compared.

    1. Re:Comparability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is comparing the marketing strategies for the various iterations of the product.

      (I see that someone else already replied with this, but they were modded down because they then added an insult instead of just submitting the answer.)

  5. Welcome to the 21st century.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..where people care about the version number of a sheet of glass.

  6. 80% of the time it works every time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know how it is.

  7. Anchorman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    80% of the time, it works ... every time.

    1. Re:Anchorman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That didn't impress Veronica CORNINGstone

  8. Alternatively.. by owen.carter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This glass will break 20%+ of the time. Fixed it.

    1. Re:Alternatively.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *At Least* 20% of the time, sometimes more.

    2. Re:Alternatively.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      This glass will break 20%+ of the time. Fixed it.

      You fixed the broken glass, thus bringing the survival rate to 100%?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Alternatively.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what the "+" meant in "20%+". Sheesh.

  9. Pyrex exploding glass problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should fix their Pyrex exploding glass problem first...

    Also, Corning isn't Corning anymore; a law should be passed that
    identifies when a (former) U.S. company identifies itself with another
    country with asymmetric interests and values to our own...

    CAP === 'suffrage' really, no kidding

    1. Re:Pyrex exploding glass problem by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Pyrex is no longer manufactured by Corning, they sold that years ago to concentrate on inventing things like Gorilla Glass. They sold many of their properties not because they weren't profitable but because it wasn't innovative. The buyers subsequently went with lower manufacturing standards and substituted cost making Pyrex style glass a lot cheaper but also less resistant to heat and impact.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  10. OK.. so by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Gorilla Glass 5 is designed to improve drop performance from devices that are dropped onto rough surfaces from waist heigh to shoulder height.

    So it prevents breakage if you're standing on your head then?

    1. Re:OK.. so by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      I quite often hold mine at knee height, especially for taking photographs.

      Of, umm, insects and flowers and stuff. Yes, that's it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:OK.. so by aliquis · · Score: 1

      You meant to say kittens.

    3. Re: OK.. so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice use of code words to refer to the upskirt videos you like to record with your phone, pervert.

    4. Re:OK.. so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, 1.6 meters is 5 foot 3. Are your knees more than five feet off the floor? Are you stupendously tall, or just hideously deformed?

    5. Re: OK.. so by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Nice use of code words to admit that you're a retard, aspie.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:OK.. so by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If I'm upside-down like the guy I was replying to then yes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Broken Windows by monkeyxpress · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is crazy! Everyone knows that the iPhone screen replacement industry employs thousands of workers throughout the world. Corning makes more glass because of it. Apple sells more new iPhones. Nowhere in this story do I see anyone defending the rights of the workers who fix broken glass.

    If Corning really cared about the lowly worker, they would make glass that broke even easier. This could create thousands of new jobs and return the West to the worker utopia that it once was!

    1. Re:Broken Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only tested it when dropping the phones on flat surfaces. Unfortunately, every time the screen has cracked, it's when it falls on a pointy bit of ground like a stone.

    2. Re:Broken Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, there's nothing great about a glass that does not break "80% of the time". That still means if you drop your phone five times, the glass will break (probability Nazis please go away - you know what I mean by the above). How !any times a year do you drop your phone? Mine, it happens probably every month. I am a clumsy person, like most geeks. Yet my phone, which is 8 years old now, never broke. How is that possible? Well, the "glass" is made of plastic. End of story...

    3. Re:Broken Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How !any times...

      How on Earth did you manage to substitute an ! for an m? These keys aren't even close!

    4. Re:Broken Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't see my android keyboard very well because of all the scratches on my plastic screen.

  12. 80% of the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    80% of the time it works every time...

    Is it gorilla glass or panther glass?

  13. Gorilla strong, Teen stronger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would definitely buy something called "Teenager Glass" . My daughters subject their mobys to far greater rough stuff than an angry male Mountain Gorilla ever could . You can surmise then, that up to now ( as Father and family phone procurer and manager :-( ) that I've found that Dow Corning's ridiculously-named product continues to disappoint .

    1. Re:Gorilla strong, Teen stronger... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Are other phones like mine? I've got a low-end Samsung and the surface certainly looks nice and glossy but the slightest trace of moisture makes it like a bar of soap.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re: Gorilla strong, Teen stronger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should try keeping your phone dry, dumbass. Even most idiots understand that moisture damages electronics like phones.

    3. Re: Gorilla strong, Teen stronger... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Which part of slightest trace don't they teach at Fat Cunt Valley Remedial High?

      Over here when it's not hot enough to make you sweat it's pissing it down with rain. On a really good day it does both.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Is that the "best" way to drop test a phone? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    If you drop a phone face-first on a flat surface then the bezel will hit first and the force will be spread out across the entire bezel. If you drop a phone corner-first on a flat surface then all the force has to be distributed from that one corner, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of it went through the screen.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Is that the "best" way to drop test a phone? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      If you drop a phone face-first on a flat surface then the bezel will hit first and the force will be spread out across the entire bezel. If you drop a phone corner-first on a flat surface then all the force has to be distributed from that one corner, and I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of it went through the screen.

      Well. Good for them their name isn't Cornering Gorilla Glass then now isn't it?

      "Super shatter-proof glass 5, only breaks ever second-fourth time!" (Here I wanted to account for less precise falls ..)

    2. Re:Is that the "best" way to drop test a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the best way for them! I mean, who wants to advertise: Buy our new robust glass, it still breaks every time you drop it!

  15. When I see "Up to 80%" by Maritz · · Score: 1

    What I read is "As little as 0%"

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    1. Re:When I see "Up to 80%" by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      What I read is "As little as 0%"

      It's kind of like Sex Panther. 80% of the time, it works every time!

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  16. An improvement is an improvement. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    Ah a tech advance brings out all the fucktards disappointed that it still isn't good enough to prevent them from breaking their phones when they do stupid things with them.

    All I have to say is good job Corning at improving your product. Now back to the lab, there is more work to do, or better yet find some dude name Scotty and ask him about that transparent aluminum stuff.

  17. Don't be stupid; material vs competition at size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tempting as it is for every idiot to act like they know something about testing or quality control, please just go compare this thickness of ANY other material and notice how much better survival rates this material has.

  18. moderately interesting by pD-brane · · Score: 1

    Thinner glass breaks more easily, and probably new versions of things are still overall slightly better than previous versions.

  19. Damn dirty apes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like this is used in a bunch of crappy android devices (high end my ass). Only gorillas would use these devices.

    I'll keep my superior sapphire glass, thanks.

    1. Re: Damn dirty apes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By dirty apes and gorillas, I assume you're referring to niggers. And yes, Android phones are for niggers and other untermenschen. For us ubermenschen, we use iPhones.

  20. Just add Armor by lapm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Funny, phones are so fragile now days that we need to add extra armor just to keep it going... How about actually build that phone properly in first place?

    1. Re:Just add Armor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While on one hand I do agree that phones should be built properly in the first place, I don't think there will ever be total elimination for a case of some kind. Really depends on your use cases for your phone though.

      I like to have my case and screen protector on for no better reason than it can take the wear and tear and be easily replaced. And well, everything will suffer wear and tear no matter how durably it's built.

    2. Re:Just add Armor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like this one was?
      http://static.digit.in/fckeditor/uploads/3-3310.jpg

    3. Re:Just add Armor by turp182 · · Score: 1

      I've wondered this myself and thought about it a bit.

      My conclusions were:
      1.a. People like to decorate their phones as they see fit (proper armor would make cases that much larger)
      1.b. The ability to decorate a phone using after market cases is important to the phone manufacturer since more people are likely to buy a phone if they can dress it up as they would like.
      2. Aftermarket products have varying levels of protection, the consumer can choose what suits them (a woman with her phone in her purse all of the time has different needs than myself, I carry my phone in a pants pocket).

      So they focus on thin phones of various rectangular sizes.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  21. Re: Poor little millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, the word is spelled m-i-l-l-e-n-n-i-a-l, but you know that because you've been corrected previously while posting similar trolls. Now that we have addressed your lack of spelling skills, let's move on to the real purpose of my post. Fuck you. That is all.

  22. still rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But when compared to other thin glasses designed for and used in industries and also massed produced,I still find gorilla glass to be rubbish.
    Ask anyone who works in a chemical lab or lots of industries about their experiences of using other glasses that are made out of thin glasses,some are very delicate,but others easily put corning gorilla to shame.

    1. Re:still rubbish by guruevi · · Score: 1

      What chemical lab uses flexible glass? Corning Glass and Pyrex are no longer owned by this company.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  23. 5' 3" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.6 meters = 5 feet, 3 inches

    1. Re:5' 3" by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Which is the only smart thing about the article. This seems like a good height from which to drop-test a phone. It's about the maximum height from which somebody will accidentally drop it. Of course most people are taller than this, but the test isn't for people who want to balance their phone on their head. Most people hold the phone at chest height and that's when it's most likely to drop.

    2. Re:5' 3" by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Unless they are clumsy, like me. A typical drop for me of something I am holding usually includes a tumble down a flight or two of stairs, sometimes even going off the side of the stairs onto a lower flight, causing falls of distances that are sometimes over 10 feet. Onto tile. Or concrete. Fortunately, I have a very hearty case that has protected my phone well. I had an Otter case for my old phone for many years, and decided to upgrade earlier this year because my provider offered me a good deal for a new phone that I would not have been able to take advantage of much later. I have a UAG case for my newer phone which has protected it equally well.

      I doubt Gorilla Glass would make even a drop of difference.

      (see what I did there?)

    3. Re:5' 3" by O-Deka-K · · Score: 1

      (see what I did there?)

      You made a Corning pun?

  24. Re:Don't be stupid; material vs competition at siz by green1 · · Score: 1

    Sure, I'll compare it to plastic which, if you recall, used to be the predominant screen material. Plastic screens shattered almost never, and didn't have the huge glare problems present in modern handhelds.
    The downside was slightly less scratch resistance, but a screen protector handles that nicely, and large portions of the population use those on gorilla glass anyway.

  25. Re:Don't be stupid; material vs competition at siz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong. Compare it to plastic at 0.6mm thickness. That is comparable to a contact lens. That plastic breaks much more easily.

  26. The problem is metal phones by danbob999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The main problem is that too much phone manufacturers pandered to those who value form over function by making phones in heavy metal. These phones are denser and have more chances to break when they reach the ground. Plastic can bend and absorbs some shock. Metal will transmit the shock to the display and other components. Plastic phones are much better, but some reviewers decided they "felt cheap" (whatever that means).

    A lite plastic phone with gorilla glass has high survivability to drops. Just don't make it in metal.

    1. Re:The problem is metal phones by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      I agree that modern plastics may be better than metal, but regardless of what the phone materials, you can put them in a case made out of whatever you want!

    2. Re:The problem is metal phones by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      When you put a case on it, it's better if the phone is as light as possible so again plastic is better when you have a case. Since it's also better when you don't, phones should never be made of metal.

    3. Re:The problem is metal phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite phone was. Long time ago, I think it was called a G2. Had a slider keyboard and everything.

    4. Re:The problem is metal phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I never understood who and why the trend of "let's make phones of the 2 most unsuitable materials for hand-held devices" started!
      The Galaxy S2 seems like it was the last phone they actually made out of materials suitable for the purpose (no, making it out of shiny and slippery polished plastic is not a good idea either).

    5. Re:The problem is metal phones by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      According to an article I read yesterday, when the Nokia (Non-Microsoft) phones come out in 6 months or so they will be based on polycarbonate frames.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:The problem is metal phones by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      Yeah of course plastic phones still exist. There is still a trend in the high end phone market to switch to metal for no good reason.

    7. Re:The problem is metal phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thermals anyone? Majority of the high end phones have issues with heat and throttle down as soon as you put any significant load on the CPU for longer than few moments. Making the phones out of aluminum helps, insulating plastic not so much.

    8. Re:The problem is metal phones by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      phones should never be made of metal

      And yet the most durable phones on the market are. Stay away from overly broad generalisations and stick to specifics like ultra thin large phones with large crackable surfaces, with no buffer and no bezel protecting shattering components should never be made of metal if durability is your number one concern. It makes much more sense.

    9. Re:The problem is metal phones by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I thought about this too but for this to be really effective, the phone body should contact the hot parts (like the SoC). I've never seen such a design.

    10. Re:The problem is metal phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bitztream, the autism-hating Slashdot troll!

    11. Re:The problem is metal phones by danbob999 · · Score: 1

      phones should never be made of metal

      And yet the most durable phones on the market are.

      Most high end phones are. I expect a $1000 phone to be more durable than a cheap $100 one.
      Yet, the $1000 phone would be even more durable if it was not made in metal.

    12. Re: The problem is metal phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Chinese 100 dollar phone, it came with malware, but damn excluding the faulty battery that I am sure will explode someday, this phone can survive any drop, I take it out of my pocket fumble and accidentally throw it at concrete, the back just popped off, and it got a little dent on the corner.

    13. Re:The problem is metal phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what the heatpipes and whatnot in the newer phones are for? I don't do thermal designs for a living but the frame sure seems way too thin to be able to spread out the heat evenly. And then you could only imagine the torrent of complains if there was a scorching hot spot behind the phone...

  27. It's not even proper Pyrex these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pyrex used to be a trade name for borosilicate glass. That stuff is remarkably safe at oven temperatures. What is sold these days with Pyrex marked on the side is just ordinary glass (ok, maybe ordinary glass, -slightly improved-.) It is absolutely not borosilicate. Evidently, Pyrex means whatever Corning wants it to mean: it's just a BRAND now. Deceptive bastards.

    1. Re: It's not even proper Pyrex these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see Pyrex brand is no longer made by Corning and probably the shenanigans started then. Shame on the bastards who own the trademark now for deception.

  28. Anchorman... by johnwfran · · Score: 1

    "They've done studies, you know. 60% of the time, it works every time."

    1. Re:Anchorman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same joke was posted TWICE already over FIVE hours ago. Dumbass.

  29. Sapphire by StikyPad · · Score: 0

    How does this compare to sapphire crystal? If unfavorably, why are we still talking about it?

    1. Re:Sapphire by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      It compares favorably in terms of cost.

    2. Re:Sapphire by Shatrat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Synthetic Sapphire (Corundum) crystal is very hard and scratch resistant, but also very brittle. I would expect it to be inferior to Corning's solution unless it was much thicker.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  30. That's pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a bit like those systems that claim to stay up 99.9% of the time - nobody would rely on such a system. Likewise, a phone that comes with a screen that is claimed to have one in five chances to break when dropped from 6 feet would provide me with a reason NOT to buy that particular phone.

  31. Re:Don't be stupid; material vs competition at siz by green1 · · Score: 1

    Absolutely incorrect. The plastic remains flexible, so doesn't shatter. But even baring that. Don't be stupid and use appropriate thickness of materials where necessary.

  32. This is glue. Strong stuff. by johnslater · · Score: 1

    And for the 20%+ of the time that it breaks, there's Gorilla Glue

  33. Expected this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fall

  34. Re:Don't be stupid; material vs competition at siz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    faggot