Slashdot Mirror


Office 365 Gets New Word, PowerPoint and Outlook Features (networkworld.com)

New submitter Miche67 writes: As part of the July 2016 update to Office 365, Microsoft is adding several features across the board to Word, PowerPoint and Outlook. Word, however, is getting the biggest new features -- Researcher and Editor -- to improve your writing. "As its name implies, Researcher is designed to help the user find reliable sources of information by using the Bing Knowledge Graph to search for sources, and it will properly cite them in the Word document," reports Network World. "[Editor] builds on the already-existing spellchecker and thesaurus to offer suggestions on how to improve your overall writing. In addition to the wavy red line under a misspelled word and the wavy blue line under bad grammar, there will be a gold line for writing style." The new features are expected to be available later this year. In addition to the two new features added to PowerPoint last year -- Designer and Morph, Microsoft is offering Zoom, a feature that lets you easily create "interactive, non-linear presentations." "Instead of the 1-2-3-4 linear method of presenting slides, forcing you to place them all in the order you wish to display, presenters will be able to show their slides in any order they want at any time," reports Network World. "This way you can change your presentation order as needed without having to stop PowerPoint or interrupt the display." As for Outlook, Focused Inbox is coming to Office 365. Focused Inbox separates your inbox into two tabs. The "Focused" tab is where all of your high-priority emails will be found, while everything else will be in the "Other" tab. Outlook will learn from your behavior over time and sort your mail accordingly. In addition, @mentions are coming to Outlook 365 and Outlook for PC and Mac, "making it easy to identify emails that need your attention, as well as flag actions for others."

55 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. So in other Words, by The+Real+Dr+John · · Score: 5, Informative

    they didn't add any new useful features except to force more searches through Bing.

    --
    A brain is a terrible thing to waste... Mind? That's debatable.
    1. Re:So in other Words, by msauve · · Score: 2
      It's all clueless hype.

      The "Focused" tab is where all of your high-priority emails will be found, while everything else will be in the "Other" tab. Outlook will learn from your behavior over time and sort your mail accordingly.

      That's a non-sequitur. High priority emails are those with a Priority:urgent header. There's nothing to learn, it's a simple, straightforward rule, which has been done for decades by any decent MUA. If they're doing something different, they shouldn't call it "priority.'

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:So in other Words, by ShaunC · · Score: 2

      Moreover, most MUAs can be set to ignore the X-Priority, X-MSMail-Priority, etc. headers altogether. Everyone's email looks the same to me, so a few times a year I get to take an angry call from someone asking why I haven't replied to their urgent priority message yet. Sorry, but "Subject: data export for October" isn't as urgent as you think it is, and the guy who sent "Subject: Utility work at Chicago datacenter tomorrow" with a normal priority header is actually going to get attention first. Outlook's return receipt feature is another barrel of fun, my client is set not to honor them, which occasionally sends people into a frenzy.

      Speaking of things that have been done well for decades, the @mentions thing doesn't sound like any great shakes either. "Making it easy to identify emails that need your attention, as well as flag actions for others" sounds a lot like CC'ing people to me.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    3. Re:So in other Words, by morcego · · Score: 2

      High priority emails are those with a Priority:urgent header.

      Except that most antispam software treats that as a clue it's not really high priority, but spam.

      --
      morcego
    4. Re:So in other Words, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's all clueless hype.

      No, it actually is not. And this is from a person who really despises Microsoft and has no intention to upgrade from Windows 7.

      That's a non-sequitur. High priority emails are those with a Priority:urgent header. There's nothing to learn, it's a simple, straightforward rule, which has been done for decades by any decent MUA. If they're doing something different, they shouldn't call it "priority.'

      The priority you are describing is what the sender of the email is stating.

      That sender-stated priority may or may not have nothing at all to do with what you consider to have a high or low priority, which is what the feature is about.

      So, the sender's priority may or may not factor in to the overall classification, and will most likely still be able to show up in red or whatever style you wish, but the "Focused" stuff will learn about what you think has high priority and show such emails there.

      So, no, it's neither clueless nor a non-sequitur.

    5. Re:So in other Words, by msauve · · Score: 1

      it actually is not.

      Yes, it most certainly is. The point flew over your head, you just didn't hear the "whoosh" because of how far over your head it went. "Priority" is a long time, well defined term with regard to email. Everyone does email priority, which makes this PR release hype. Whatever MS is doing, they're wrong to call it "priority."

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  2. More crap to turn off by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Word rarely does what I want it to do so I've turned off most of the "help". Once we're forced to upgrade to this crap this will be more cruft to disable.

    I can't wait to hear from our users when they whine about not being able to get their work done because Word is trying to be "helpful".

    Word for Office 365: Revenge of Clippy

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:More crap to turn off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > I can't wait to hear from our users when they whine

      Sounds like you're the one whining.

    2. Re:More crap to turn off by chipschap · · Score: 2

      AbiWord is surprisingly good for its small size.

    3. Re: More crap to turn off by pthfdr · · Score: 1

      Yes. Do you ever wondered why LibreOffice occupies 100MiB+ of your precious hard disk space,and all you want to do is to just write a document? At least The documents produced by Word for DOS can still be read by those modern bloatware.

    4. Re:More crap to turn off by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      As if MS Word wasn't already counter intuitive enough

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  3. Woah, non-linear PowerPoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now it's almost caught up with Hyper-Card.

  4. Re:365 = You pay for it 365 days of the year by chipschap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Office had all the function you needed back in Office 2000.

    I could argue (at least up to a point) that WordStar 5.5 had everything you need for, you know, writing. And once you learned the key patterns, which made eminent sense in terms of finger motions, using a mouse would just slow you down (a lot). Try using Word without frequently lifting your hand off the keyboard to grab the mouse.

    Word and the rest of MS Office have too much stuff that only adds confusion and bloat.

  5. Oh $DEITY, Have Pity on Me! by namgge · · Score: 1

    The only good thing about PowerPoint was that it forced people to think about what they were going to say and in what order.

    1. Re:Oh $DEITY, Have Pity on Me! by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> PowerPoint was that it forced people to think about what they were going to say and in what order

      Have you ever BEEN to a PowerPoint presentation?

    2. Re:Oh $DEITY, Have Pity on Me! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only good thing about PowerPoint was that it forced people to think about what they were going to say and in what order.

      Exactly. If Abraham Lincoln had Powerpoint, the Gettysburg Address could have looked like this.

    3. Re:Oh $DEITY, Have Pity on Me! by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      The only good thing about PowerPoint was that it forced people to think about what they were going to say and in what order.

      Too funny! I'm gonna print this out and frame it, that's how funny it is.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  6. Revenge of Clippy by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    >> Researcher and Editor

    which was codenamed "Clippy", right?

  7. Re:Non-linear Presentation by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    >>>> Non-linear Presentation
    >> Whatever the fuck that means.

    It's a new feature that allows the audience to read whatever they want into your presentation. Very popular, I would imagine.

  8. LibreOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I suppose this confirms LibreOffice has almost caught up in the interoperaton stakes.
    MS had to introduce new incompatability features.

    1. Re:LibreOffice by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      My Office 2008 has a couple incompatibility "features" with the version the rest of my office is using... So I decided to try Libre Office again. It has gotten pretty good, although there are a few things I find mildly annoying. Just might switch the office over to it, no real reason at this point not to, at least from what I see today.

  9. Re:Non-linear Presentation by chispito · · Score: 1

    Whatever the fuck that means. What, are people trying to make games in PowerPoint now?

    Choose-Your-Own-Presentation. While most people prefer the Edward Packard slide decks, R. A. Montgomery does have a substantial following in the board room circuit.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  10. Office 2K by antdude · · Score: 1

    I am still using it even though rarely. It works well for me. Better compatibility than the non-MS Office softwares.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  11. Re:Word up by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

    Far be it from me to "defend" word (a plain text editor and TeX is more my style), but do really blame the programmers for the bulk of Word's shortcomings? I suspect it wasn't a programmer who said, "hey, let's have a talking paperclip!"

    If it's buggy and crashing all the time, then it's poor programming, poor QA, or unrealistic timeframes set by the higher-ups. If it's the features that are completely useless and laughable, then I wouldn't be blaming the programmers. But that's just me...

  12. Re:Non-linear Presentation by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

    In a nonlinear world, I might be the OP of this thread!

  13. Re:365 = You pay for it 365 days of the year by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could argue (at least up to a point) that WordStar 5.5 had everything you need for, you know, writing.

    Not at all. By far the hardest part of writing is thinking of something to say. Wordstar didn't help with that. But Bing-enhanced Word-365 can actually help you create the content. This is especially useful when you have no opinion or knowledge about the subject, such as writing a school term paper.

  14. Cut 'n Paste by Kernel+Krumpit · · Score: 1

    How I wish that I could Cut & Paste what I wanted to quickly and easily - just like in the old days. Cutting text in Word is - always - a nightmare and it's suggestions are - always - less than helpful. I agree let's go back to the functionality of the 2000/3 version. Thank Buddha I still have a couple of versions installed. Word 'functionality' is an oxy... If you've ever tried to get anything done with Tables or moving text round then it's taken you way longer than it used to.

    --
    May the lies we live by make us strong, healthy, happy and wise - Kurt Vonnegut.
    1. Re:Cut 'n Paste by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you've ever tried to get anything done with Tables or moving text round then it's taken you way longer than it used to.

      Me: "I want to move this paragraph a little to the left."
      Word: "No, I'm going to fuck up the entire document instead."

      Me: "Insert an extra-indented bullet point here."
      Word: "Excuse me while I ruin all your formatting and renumber everything from the start of your thesis."

      Me: "Remove this line from the Table Of Contents."
      Word: "HEY! Look at all the extra shit I found and slammed into the Table Of Contents!"

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    2. Re:Cut 'n Paste by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

      I have never rage quit anything as hard as when I rage quit MS Word during my picture heavy study assignment the other day. It's all a bit of a blur now, but I distinctly remember the hate, the absolute hate I had for all things Microsoft after it complete fucked my assignment. Hours were lost. :( But, from every down there's an up. That day I gave up on Word for ever, my friends reminded me that I had Powerpoint installed, and needless to say that all my assignments are done, rightly or wrongly, in Powerpoint... and I can put my photo's where ever the fuck I want.

    3. Re:Cut 'n Paste by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And this is what we get when somebody tries to use a word processor for complex document layout. This is what's behind all the bloat in Word: people using the wrong tool for the job.

      I know people do it all the time, but that doesn't mean it ever made sense. Typesetting and layout should be mostly independent of content creation. When you try to combine the two dynamically, this kind of crap is just bound to happen.

      You want to do layout and actual decent typography? Use a tool designed for it. InDesign works. LaTeX is good.

      Or heck, learn how to use styles and proper global formatting settings in Word, rather than direct formatting hacks everywhere... And suddenly a lot of this crap won't happen.

      (P.S. I hate Word with a passion and rarely use it except when forced to. And Word is buggy. But if this stuff happens too often, it's likely also because you're trying to do things like you're still using a typewriter instead of the right features or even the right software application.)

    4. Re:Cut 'n Paste by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Word makes it difficult sometimes to use it as a word processor. In particular, I find it's implementation of styles somewhat clunky and it is painful to create and manage tables, figures, and pictures. The fields also have odd behavior that hasn't been updated in decades. They keep bolting stuff on, but not fixing the underlying warts - presumably for compatibility. The result is several different "layers" on the document, with a combination of new and old objects that you can stick on various layers, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. There are several ways to do a text box, for instance, and each are edited through a completely separate workflow.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:Cut 'n Paste by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      And this is what we get when somebody tries to use a word processor for complex document layout.

      I couldn't agree more, but Microsoft promotes Word as a tool that can do all of these things. Look at any of their promo stuff and it shows Word being used as a layout tool, a graphics design tool, etc etc.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  15. Zoom by Trogre · · Score: 1

    As in the video conferencing software that has pretty much replaced Skype in academia and business?

    Or another Zoom?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  16. Does outlook now sync with Google calendar / Andro by brasselv · · Score: 2

    you know, without hacks, 3rd party synchronizers, gapps subscription, etc etc.
    just painless straightforward two way synchronization like almost any other calendar client does.

    genuinely interested to know if it works. last time I checked it was a nightmare.

    --
    "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
  17. Re:365 = You pay for it 365 days of the year by chipschap · · Score: 2

    You're saying that Bing searches, embedded in Word, help you write? I suppose they help you do research, which you can do equally well in your web browser. About the only thing special here is the citation feature. Embedded research isn't new; Google Docs has it, for one.

    But yes, what to write is one of the hardest parts of writing. I'd argue that a word processor's role is to write your words down, not do research. It's the Unix philosophy: have a tool do one thing and do it well.

  18. Not yet! by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    Not yet! I'm not done bitching about the last new features!

  19. Re:365 = You pay for it 365 days of the year by chipschap · · Score: 1

    I have to add that Emacs has had comprehensive web lookup since at least 2011 (the xah-lookup package). Your choice of Wikipedia, Google, and six different dictionaries, but surprisingly(!) the package maintainer didn't include Bing search.

  20. Re:What about Excel? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Sheets was far behind a year or two, but what do you think it can't do today? Pivot tables, filters, formatting are all comparable, and some of the formula building stuff is actually better.

  21. Re:Fix the MAC version first by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Try Libre Office. Only been a week or two since I started using it again, but it definitely does the job for me.

  22. Re:Does outlook now sync with Google calendar / An by Gaccm · · Score: 1

    Doesn't look like it. The crazy thing is that Windows 10's default mail and calendar apps seamlessly work with Google calendar. Are the codebases really so different that they can't import that feature into Outlook 365?

    --

    Only dead fish swim with the stream...
  23. Re:And a totally new error message by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Completely useless format, I use the ISO A4 format.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  24. Re:Word up by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

    Word 2.0c was decent.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  25. Plain text... by pthfdr · · Score: 1

    Every document used to be simple. Every document used to be direct. Every document used to depend on no software. What about now?

  26. Re:Non-linear Presentation by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    It's very useful to be able to create presentations with multiple paths through them. You can embed deep-dives into things that you're trying to explain and skip over them if the audience either isn't interested in that part or that they want more information about. Quite a few other presentation tools provide support for non-linear presentations, PowerPoint is playing catchup.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  27. Re:Does outlook now sync with Google calendar / An by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Excel alone has it's own completely vertically integrated team who maintains their own compiler... doubt that there is much shared code between Excel and the other Office apps, let alone Windows 10.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  28. Re:What about Excel? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    I'm torn on this... Excel is so abused by engineers already, I'm not sure I want too many more engineering-friendly features added. Python, R, MATLAB, JMP... please, just use another tool. The other solutions are not quick and dirty, and sometimes quick and dirty is all you need - but good lord, know when to move on to another tool. We have an abortion of an Excel sheet that does data collection, including ftp and telnet, and then tries to manipulate the resulting huge data sets. I blame MS for removing the row and column limits that used to nip such silliness in the bud. :)

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  29. Re:Fix the MAC version first by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    My hat's off to you on wrestling Word into that workflow. You are a patient man/woman.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  30. Re:Word up by tsqr · · Score: 1

    Word 2.0c was decent.

    I'll second that. Word 2 and Excel 4, on OS/2.

  31. Re:365 = You pay for it 365 days of the year by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about MS products and Windows itself is that there are keyboard shortcuts for nearly every function.

    I don't often use my mouse when in Office apps. Even in Windows, I use the keyboard as much as possible.

    I guess it just depends on how much you are willing to learn. The mouse is for beginners.

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  32. Search? by davidshewitt · · Score: 3, Funny

    The feature I'd like to see in Office is a search bar that finds the button you're looking for on the ribbon.

  33. Bad grammar by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    "the wavy blue line under bad grammar"

    I don't see any wavy blue line. Network World doesn't use Word, I surmise.

    1. Re:Bad grammar by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      Dude, you majorly misunderstood my comment.

  34. Is it just me with this concern? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I am concerned that because of the ubiquity or Word/Office, many corporate sheep are already unjustifiably using Microsoft tools as the final arbiter of proper grammar/writing style, and will now start to use them to determine the veracity of all knowledge.
    That puts Microsoft in one hell of a powerful position that they have already proven themselves to be far to untrustworthy to actually be in.

  35. Re:Does outlook now sync with Google calendar / An by brasselv · · Score: 1

    Yup, but I doubt it's a "technical issue" anyways...
    Plenty of 3rd parties are using the Google Calendar API to update back and forth - so it cannot be rocket science.

    More likely that it's a battle of corporate overlords ("do we have more to gain or more to lose, if we allow this?")

    --
    "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." (Oscar Wilde)
  36. Re:365 = You pay for it 365 days of the year by Agripa · · Score: 1

    I actually preferred WordStar 3.31 to the later versions. And running on the 8-bit CP/M systems of the time, it was *still* faster than Word running on a modern system.