Slashdot Mirror


Russian Government Gets 'Hacked Back', Attacks Possibly Launched By The NSA (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader write: Russian government bodies have been hit by a "professional" cyber attack, according to the country's intelligence service, which said the attack targeted state organizations and defense companies, as well as Russia's "critically important infrastructures". The agency told the BBC that the powerful malware "allowed those responsible to switch on cameras and microphones within the computer, take screenshots and track what was being typed by monitoring keyboard strokes."
ABC News reports that the NSA "is likely 'hacking back' Russia's government-linked cyber-espionage teams "to see once and for all if they're responsible for the massive breach at the Democratic National Committee, according to three former senior intelligence officials... Robert Joyce, chief of the NSA's shadowy Tailored Access Operations, declined to comment on the DNC hack specifically, but said in general that the NSA has technical capabilities and legal authorities that allow the agency to 'hack back' suspected hacking groups, infiltrating their systems to gather intelligence about their operations in the wake of a cyber attack... In some past unrelated cases...NSA hackers have been able to watch from the inside as malicious actors conduct their operations in real time."

91 of 173 comments (clear)

  1. Anyone else here just... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    ... suddenly get a picture in their heads of that scene from "The Princess Bride" where Vizzini talks about how he was hired to start a war?

    1. Re:Anyone else here just... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Oh come on it was semi-ontopic, starring Control agent 99. We are discussing espionage...

  2. Hmmm by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    "allowed those responsible to switch on cameras and microphones within the computer, take screenshots and track what was being typed by monitoring keyboard strokes." Kindergarden level keylogger hack by standards of the indistry

    1. Re:Hmmm by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Funny

      But the trick was getting them to install it by putting out a package called "DNC hack files complete ".

    2. Re:Hmmm by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2, Funny

      >"allowed those responsible to switch on cameras and microphones within the computer, take screenshots and track what was being typed by monitoring keyboard strokes." Kindergarden level keylogger hack by standards of the indistry

      Or you just upgrade them to Windows 10.

  3. That's nice by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    Good to see the NSA point their guns in the right direction, no?

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:That's nice by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Oh please! The situation is stable.. The sun is going to consume the earth in a few billion years anyway. Let's not sweat the small shit. Just tell them you're Canadian.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:That's nice by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 2

      There are no right directions in this kind of game any more. Nobody has any moral high ground left to call an end to it, which means it's an ever-escalating cat-and-mouse game. The agencies and politicians doing this should sober up and call an end to it. Make the world a safer place by blocking holes in software products, not create them.

      --
      -SR
    3. Re:That's nice by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      You gotta do both.

      Nobody has any moral high ground left to call an end to it, which means it's an ever-escalating cat-and-mouse game..

      Exactly. All bets are off. The baddest sociopath wins. But you do get points for subtlety. As they say, "blood is a big expense..."

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:That's nice by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I don't care about moral high ground nearly as much as I care about American elections staying American.

    5. Re:That's nice by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      There is a high ground in this case, just not a moral one. That high ground is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and it is exactly where this stupidity will end. They keep playing this game and eventually they will start pulling each others plugs and we will get caught in the crossfire.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:That's nice by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 1

      That's just the thing, it's out of control at the moment. The US, for example, has supported or brought countless dictators to power by fixing or helping fix elections, or otherwise playing dirty. I'm sure the people of these countries feel the same way you do. The healing process begins at home.

      --
      -SR
    7. Re:That's nice by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Good to see the NSA point their guns in the right direction, no?

      So they're probably not.

      Bill Binnie is saying that it was an NSA agent who hacked the DNC because he was personally pissed off that SoS Clinton was using Gamma intel in unclassified memos and never had to be accountable for that.

      Anyway, Snowden said that XKeyscore can already tell exactly who hacked the DNC, so the NSA already knows (assuming he's right - he says he's done that kind of tracing himself).

      Putin is probably laughing at the D's and R's tripping all over themselves to point fingers outward. If you have to vote, at least punch the L lever this round (even if they're not L's).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:That's nice by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Possible that Snowden is the "hacker"? He has shown a certain distaste for the democrats, with all his "leaks" targeting this administration, and potentially the next.

      Yeah, Johnson would be the preferred "anti-Trump" vote, but it's Trump's followers that need to be convinced.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  4. WHAT FUN by axewolf · · Score: 1, Insightful

    THE COLD WAR IS BACK its like a sports game our team vs. theirs what a time to be alive!
    This totally makes me forget about the fact that my government directs the same exact actions that it uses to ATTACK Russia toward me and mine for the purposes of our own SECURITY. It makes a lot of sense! The enemy is not my government and my employer that supports it, but it is a foreign entity that has almost no effect on my life whatsoever.

    1. Re:WHAT FUN by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Yeah it would be fun to watch the CIA fund the opposition in russia to weaken the position of putin. Its not that they are not experienced, this is a standard tool in their toolset. Maybe we get crimea back, and russia becomes a democracy. Russia joining EU, anyone??

    2. Re:WHAT FUN by fnj · · Score: 1

      THE COLD WAR IS BACK

      The cold war was too much of a good thing for too many of the power elite for them to let it go. Part of it (but not all of it) is that it fits their worldview of cowboys and indians. With the cold war to fall back on, they never have to evaluate real issues with real thought.

    3. Re:WHAT FUN by fnj · · Score: 2

      Maybe we get crimea back, and russia becomes a democracy.

      Who is "we"? Russia *IS* a representative democratic republic, Sparky. It's just as much a "democracy" as the US. As for the Crimea, the people spoke in a referendum, and unification with Russia won. Look, the Crimea was always overrun since antiquity by one set of conquerors after another; it got its ass handed to it when it was annexed by Russia in 1783. Then the USSR colonized it pretty thoroughly from 1917 on. Unfortunate, but no way is that going to be undone, any more than the seizure of North and South America from the natives by Europeans will be undone.

    4. Re:WHAT FUN by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      THE COLD WAR IS BACK

      Was it ever really gone, or just taking a nap?

      We're gonna need more missile defense, though.

    5. Re:WHAT FUN by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Who is "we"? Russia *IS* a representative democratic republic, Sparky. It's just as much a "democracy" as the US.

      Not even the most brainwashed supporter could ever actually believe that. Russia is a democracy in name only. It isn't a constitutional democracy--the constitution says whatever Putin says it does. The US is highly flawed, but nobody is concerned that Obama is going to have Trump killed. Putin won't allow challengers, and we both know it.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    6. Re:WHAT FUN by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Who is "we"?

      Citizens of the "grand area" of places of US influence. You know, it is true, the US maintains some sort of control over countries which live in the "grand area", the area of its influence. But the countries have much better freedom, much better judiciary systems, much less bribe going on and almost no oligarchy system in the economy. That's why I am on their side.

      any more than the seizure of North and South America from the natives by Europeans will be undone.

      Are these countries parts of the territory of the european countries? No they aren't, they became independent. Different story for crimea.

    7. Re:WHAT FUN by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah it would be fun to watch the CIA fund the opposition in russia to weaken the position of putin.

      Do you think we didn't have a role in the Ukrainian fiasco that ousted the pro-Russian government?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    8. Re:WHAT FUN by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      I am most certain we had.

  5. Wait... by Budgreen · · Score: 2

    Didn't anonymous post something a day or so ago claiming something similar?

    --
    The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    1. Re:Wait... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Anonymous says a lot of things.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re: Wait... by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      Had to do with a utility company? Wish I could remember where I saw it.

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
  6. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you just born yesterday? NSA hacked a lot of countries before this hack. Even allies. Are you really that stupid? USA is a bully for a very long time. USA is only the best at one thing: creating their own enemies.

  7. In other news by Budgreen · · Score: 2

    Russian intelligence agencies use computers with Webcam's and mic's in uncovered and useable condition?

    I find this a bit hard to believe.

    --
    The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      A bit hard. try impossible to believe. It would be like suggesting the NSA sit in front of computers with open webcams and mics. I work with one defense agency (from another country) and cameras are not permitted in the building, any permanent device with a web cam either has it mechanically disabled or tapped over. I would be stunned if this is not standard practise everywhere, especially agencies in the US and Russia where they take paranoid to whole new levels.

    2. Re: In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have been inside NSA facility, can confirm they are not dumb enough to have webcams, or for that matter non air gapped systems. They are very thorough about that.

    3. Re:In other news by chasm22 · · Score: 1

      A quick reread might help.

      The article stated that "the attack targeted state organizations and defense companies". No mention of intelligence agencies.

    4. Re: In other news by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      ABC News reports that the NSA "is likely 'hacking back' Russia's government-linked cyber-espionage teams "

      Ok.. RE-read.

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    5. Re: In other news by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      or for that matter non air gapped systems.

      Oh good, no databases. That must make IT easy.

    6. Re: In other news by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Have been inside NSA facility, can confirm they are not dumb enough to have webcams, or for that matter non air gapped systems.

      How do they share information amongst their computers then? The only thing I can imagine is via sneakernet, but of course malware can and does propagate via USB keys and laptops also, so it seems like even that might not be sufficient.

      I suppose printing everything to paper and then typing it all back in on the next computer might be secure (assuming the typist recognizes malware before he types it in ;)), but that doesn't sound very practical.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    7. Re:In other news by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  8. Favoritism by ebonum · · Score: 1

    We should ask: If the republicans had been hacked, would Obama launch an attack?

    (Assuming this story is true.)

    1. Re:Favoritism by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The favoritism is all from the media - notice how quickly attention was diverted from the DNC fixing the nomination process? If this had been the republicans, they'd be all over the nomination fixing like flies on shit.

      Subverting the election process is a lot more damaging long-term than a one-time hack by someone in Russia who may or may not be from the government.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:Favoritism by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I'd bet you he would. Any excuse will suffice to get a free pass on collecting all that information.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Favoritism by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Correct. Now if only everybody could figure it out. By now it should be so obvious that a 5 year old could see it.

    4. Re:Favoritism by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "how quickly attention was diverted from the DNC fixing the nomination process"

      That is more because there was no evidence of the DNC fixing their nomination process, just an expected level of ineffectual bitching by minor players.

      The common message these days is that Wikileaks no longer promotes any useful information, just doxing of proles.

    5. Re:Favoritism by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Informative
      The DNC was supposed to be impartial. The DNC favored Clinton before any votes were cast. Bernie was a "problem" for them.

      Other emails show DNC staff in damage control over allegations from the Sanders campaign, when a report - corroborated by a Politico - revealed the DNC’s joint fundraising committee with the Clinton campaign was laundering money to the Clinton campaign instead of fundraising for down-ticket Democrats. Regardless of the fundraising tactics, because both major campaigns didn’t agree to use the joint fundraising committee super-PAC with the DNC, the DNC should have recused itself from participating with just the Clinton campaign.

      Follow the money.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:Favoritism by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      That is more because there was no evidence of the DNC fixing their nomination process, just an expected level of ineffectual bitching by minor players.

      This is the stupid spin we're talking about. There's *tons* of evidence the DNC was subverting their nomination process. But unless Anderson Cooper says it, people don't think it. So the media says "nothing to see here, move along move along" when there is in fact tons to see here. The media shifted focus to "Trump's a russian agent!" This is so completely ridiculous I hope it helps wake people up to the propaganda shitshow our media is.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  9. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt NSA would be that dumb..

    Wow,... did you miss the entire set of leaks from Edward Snowden? Because the NSA has been doing _exactly that_ to the entire world for over a decade. Sorry man, that ship sailed a long long long time ago. It's not a matter of guessing: it's established fact.

  10. Re:I dobut it was NSA by bloodhawk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not openly and so apparently obviously they haven't,

  11. Re:I dobut it was NSA by burtosis · · Score: 1

    No no he is right! I heard it came from a dilapatated arcade on Coney Island with a busted up sign and an illegal connection to the power grid.

  12. Tit for Tat by guises · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, woo! Take that! You fuck with our elections?! Well we'll fuck with your elections, Russia...

  13. Re: Tit for Tat by wasteoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ha ha ha! Russian elections! Oh wait, you were serious.

  14. Russia's "critically important infrastructures". by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Funny

    So their vodka distilleries and botnets got hit?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  15. HEY RUSSIA DONT EXPOSE OUR PSEUDO DEMOCRACY OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Lol. So, the Obama/Clinton duo got outed for rigging the DNC in Clinton's favor, proving, once again, that American democracy is a farce. Their response? Immediately invoke McCarthyism and, without a shred of evidence, attack Russia!

    What a country.

  16. Wouldn't it be nice by Snotnose · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if the NSA would tell Microsoft, Oracle, Adobe, et all of the vulnerabilities they knew about so the companies could patch their software? But no, the Kremlin uses the same vulnerable software so if the NSA protects American citizens it makes it harder to hack the Kremlin.

    1. Re: Wouldn't it be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even worse, the NSA makes companies leave holes open for reasons of national security.
      It really is a 1984 situation, insecurity is security.

  17. Re: No, it was me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes his complete of ability...

  18. I call BS by mea2214 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My bullshit detector is going full tilt over this entire affair. Somebody is making up stories to feed a gullible press that does little to no fact checking anymore.

    1. Re:I call BS by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Is it gullibility or are they just taking orders?

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:I call BS by axewolf · · Score: 1

      I call BS on your entire frame of mind.

      The press isn't gullible, they just don't care. They know their job is to prune the psyche of the public, not to report facts and allow the public to maintain its own psyche.

    3. Re:I call BS by backwardsposter · · Score: 1

      Good call. But doesn't matter, it's a story, damnit!

    4. Re:I call BS by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      It's just kind of all incestuous. You've got journalists married to DNC honchos or siblings of people in the administration, all beholden to the money from the same companies that own the media outlets. Our media is just propaganda, but it's not like the state is running the media. It's more like the same people who run the state run the media.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  19. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    USA is a bully for a very long time.

    It's even more funny when Russia complains it's being bullied while at the same time announcing how it might use nuclear weapons on its neighbors or how it's ramping up its military spending as well as increasing its cyber operations against its neighbors.

    I wonder how much of this is a shot over the bow, for when one of our presidential candidates invited and approved of Russia and other countries to hack us.

    Sec takes statements like that deadly seriously.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  20. Data leaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ever notice how there's never any massive data dumps with salacious details about comrade vlad in these hacks?

    1. Re:Data leaks? by swb · · Score: 1

      Vlad rode a horse without a shirt. Fucking Chuck Norris won't say shit about him.

  21. Re:Tit for Tat by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    Might be pretty easy, just hack into the systems Russia uses to fix their elections.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  22. Re:Tit for Tat by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    that's predominantly white (because gotta be PC)

    Please. The administration has never once shied away from blaming hacks on North Korea or China.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  23. I predicted Trump would cause WW3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I never imagined it would go down like this, or that it would even kick off before he is President.

  24. Good question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Given that they can call the CEO and ask people on Morning Joe to be forced to apologize if they say something they don't like and that they're holding clandestine fundraisers with the Washington Post that their lawyers told them not to do, it's hard to tell any more.

    For anyone asking for a cite, go read the email leaks.

  25. It's not the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's CowboyNeal.

    Oops, I've said too much alreadNO CARRIER

  26. Re: Tit for Tat by aliquis · · Score: 2

    Ha ha ha! Russian elections! Oh wait, you were serious.

    I don't know how Trump consider himself relative Putin but I'm not sure he's got the upper hand.

    Anyone who's willing to vote for Trump would likely had been willing to vote for Putin too. Coming from Sweden I'd vote for all of Trump, Putin and Hitler if I had a choice but sadly I don't.

  27. Hack Hick Hick Hack by no-body · · Score: 2

    Does it pay????

    It's the boys in a sand box, eh - I get you back for destroying my sand castle.

    Only problem here is that this is not limited to just the sand box and the kids playing in it, maybe the parents to some degree but the billions of humans affected - and much fewer participating as string puppets making the games possible...

    A similar game is tit for tat where totally unrelated individuals suffer.
    The string pullers should be locked in a great cage so they can fight it out and hit their own heads bloody.
    Maybe the good Donald will finally get this fixed?

    Oh well.....

  28. Irresponsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If the Russians did it they didn't hack the USA government. They hacked the DNC and made Hillary look bad compared to Bernie by revealing the truth about Wasserman Schultz's grubbiness.

    That's no excuse to use the USA governments resources for a cyberstrike against the Russian government. Very irresponsible. Don't confuse "defending" the DNC with defending the USA. Two very different things.

    1. Re:Irresponsible by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      A foreign agency is very possibly trying to interfere in US elections. Maybe you didn't think about that.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:Irresponsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they are interfering by exposing what politicians plan and say to each other behind closed doors then they're welcome to come and do some more as far as I'm concerned.

  29. Yet more cyber büllshit by khz6955 · · Score: 1

    Prothero: Do you believe this crap: Dascombe?

    Dascombe: It's not our job to believe it, Lewis. Our job is to tell the people --

  30. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Nyder · · Score: 1

    If the NSA was dumb enough to do this then they just wrote a blanket invitation to all countries to attack US owned agencies and companies openly with impunity. They will sound like complete hypocrites (even more so) and be ignored when other countries do it. I doubt NSA would be that dumb...I hope.

    https://news.slashdot.org/stor...

    Read that article, they admit to hacking other countries.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  31. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    All your signals are belong to us!

    X0X0X0 Uncle Sam

    Seriously though, if you don't think the US government takes election tampering seriously, my goodness. There are going to be a wide variety of responses to be expected. I wouldn't be surprised to see arrests or intrigue.

  32. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    USA sends their troops to invade some small and poor countries around the world, miles away from their homes. And who supplies terrorist organizations:
    US, Turkey, Saudi Arabia (Al Qaeda, ISIS, UCQ terrorist organization from Kosovo, and probably more).

  33. Re:I dobut it was NSA by NotAPK · · Score: 2

    Is anyone else a little disappointed with season 2 so far? We're four episodes in and absolutely nothing has happened!! If Elliot spend most of this season pissing about inside his head then I'm afraid all the groove set up in season 1 will be lost :(

  34. Re:I dobut it was NSA by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    NSA hacked a lot of countries before this hack. Even allies.

    How do you even know this? Are you guessing?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  35. Re:I dobut it was NSA by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

    Americans being the bully on this planet is completely unrelated to Russia's behavour, but if you put it that way, then what Russia does is small potatoes in comparison, barely a blip on the radar. Even the UK has invaded more countries in the past 20 years and is responsible for more people killed.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  36. Re: I dobut it was NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    speaking as a finnish dude..

    I find it crazy that USA first says that a cyberattack is an act of war and theb proceeds to give state agencies the rights to perform them without congressional oversight.

    Russia, sure, they do whatever shit they want but at least they don't pretend it would be acts of war.

  37. Re:I dobut it was NSA by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 2

    NSA hacked a lot of countries before this hack. Even allies.

    How do you even know this? Are you guessing?

    How do you not know this? Are you Trolling?

  38. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Funny how the U.S. is the bully when Russia repeatedly interferes in the internal affairs of its neighbors, sends its troops to invade and attack its neighbors and funds and supplies terrorist organizations on its neighbors soil to destabilize them.

    You could have the same about US policy in Central and South America at least a couple of years back.

    Try the last 40-50 years w.r.t. US meddling in Central America and South America among other countries around the planet. Who funded Osama bin Laden when the US was fighting a proxy war with the Russians in Afghanistan? The US has blood dripping from its fingertips.

  39. wow!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Truly the government is embarrassed of what revealed in the DNC emails. In all the hacks that's happened in the past few years, this one prompts the Nsa to hack back?????

  40. Re:I dobut it was NSA by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    They're just following the long-standing example of the USA.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  41. Re: I dobut it was NSA by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    American exceptionalism. "It's wrong except when we do it."

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  42. Typewriters for security? Sure, sure... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    It's just a Russian version of security theater.

    They should know.

    During much of the Cold War typewriters were state of the art, so they were the focus of spooks and spies just as mobile phone networks, emails and social networks are today.
    Techniques were developed to use cheap microphones to listen to key taps and decipher what was being written, spy cameras could peer over typist's shoulders and undercover agents could photograph and leak documents.
    Debonair KGB agents were even tasked with seducing typists and winkling information from them.
    Missile-equipped Aston Martins aside, some of what you see in James Bond films actually went on.

    In 1984 the NSA became paranoid about the extent of this sort of Russian infiltration and began what it called Project Gunman, under which it replaced every piece of communications equipment at embassies in Moscow and Leningrad.
    It shipped the old devices back to the US for analysis, and when they were X-rayed it was discovered that 16 IBM Selectric typewriters had been bugged.
    For eight years they had sent the contents of every single document to the Kremlin, via a man crouching outside with a radio receiver.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  43. Re: I dobut it was NSA by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    American LEADERSHIP exceptionalism. "It's wrong except when we do it."

    FTFY

  44. Re: I dobut it was NSA by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    " Seriously though, if you don't think the US government takes election tampering seriously, my goodness. "

    The USG just hates competition is all. Can't swing an election one way or another with other folks meddling with things too. :)

  45. THIS IS DUMB!!!! And why Democrats suck by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    First off,

    The Democrat Party/DNC/etc is NOT the U.S. government. It is a private company...that is all. Were it not so, the election fraud engaged in would have every oath sword and bound officer of the U.S. armed forces obligated to act in the DNCs removal for being a clear and present threat to our Constitution's democracy. But it's not...it is merely a political party.

    So what if it was hacked by Russians. Of which I am rather doubtful.

    So we are going to engage in an escalation of cyber-warfare with a nuclear armed nation over politics. That's just dumb. And when they respond and hack the Pentagon? Or other fare far more critical assets....what then?

    What happens when they realize they can hack our drones and crash them into our own carriers. This is just stupid behavior on the part of our President who is retaliating over personal attachment. DUMB DUMB DUMB.

  46. Re:I dobut it was NSA by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    Wasn't there stuff in the Snowden files about the NSA hacking Merkel's phone? And bugging G8 summit meetings?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  47. Re:THIS IS DUMB!!!! And why Democrats suck by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Blah blah blah....

    I never said we didn't engage in it. But publicly announcing we're increasing our cyber attacks....sorry. If you think that is good intelligence community action than you're dumb as !@#$

  48. Re: I dobut it was NSA by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Because the US has conquered Middle East countries and occupied them for a period of time?

    Exactly which Middle East country has the US annexed like Crimea or parts of Georgia?

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  49. Re:I dobut it was NSA by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Name a single country that the US annexed like Crimea or parts of Georgia.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?