Slashdot Mirror


The $5 Onion Omega2 Gives Raspberry Pi a Run For Its Money (dailydot.com)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via The Daily Dot: Onion's Omega2 computer may give the Raspberry Pi a run for its money if the success of the Kickstarter campaign is any indication. The Daily Dot reports: "With an initial goal of just $15,000, over 11,560 backers have pledged the company $446,792 in hopes of getting their hands on this little wonder board. So why are thousands of people losing their minds? Simple; the Omega2 packs a ton of power into a $5 package. Billed as the world's smallest Linux server, complete with built-in Wi-Fi, the Omega2 is perfect for building simple computers or the web connected project of your dreams. The tiny machine is roughly the size of a cherry, before expansions, and runs a full Linux operating system. For $5 you get a 580MHz CPU, 64MB memory, 16MB storage, built-in Wi-Fi and a USB 2.0 port. A $9 model is also available with 128MB of memory, 32MB of storage, and a MircoSD slot. The similarly priced Raspberry Pi Zero comes with a 1GHz Arm processor, 512MB of memory, a MicroSD slot, no onboard storage, and no built-in Wi-Fi. Omega2 supports the Ruby, C++, Python, PHP, Perl, JavaScript (Node.js), and Bash programming languages, so no matter your background in coding you should be able to figure something out." You can also add Bluetooth, GPS, and 2G/3G support via add-ons or expansions. It looks promising, though it is a Kickstarter campaign and the product may not come into fruition.

124 comments

  1. StarCitizen of Embedded Devices by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    They're wanting to do a lot for $5

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:StarCitizen of Embedded Devices by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      They're wanting to do a lot for $5

      They already have a successful product

      https://www.kickstarter.com/pr...

    2. Re:StarCitizen of Embedded Devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No they have a successful kickstarter/hype. remains to be seen whether they have a successful product or this will just be another of those ventures whey falls apart long before it becomes successful.

  2. I hope they put in an external antenna port by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    I hope they plan to put in a connector for an external Wi-Fi antenna. No antenna that you could fit into something the size of a cherry is likely to be decent. Not to mention that anything you put the device into is going to reduce your signal strength.

    Beyond that, my main concern would be the lack of flash storage. I used to build ramdisks for MkLinux, and you couldn't even fit a kernel with the RedHat installer into 16 MB. And that was fifteen years ago. I'd be surprised if a kernel with a full driver stack would even fit by itself into 16 MB of flash.... And I didn't even know you could still get flash parts that small. Is that supposed to be 16 GB, by some chance?

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    1. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it really is 16 MB not GB. Here's a whole list of devices that run Linux on between 8 and 128 MB of RAM and between 4 and 32 MB of flash.

      https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/start

    2. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, the WiFi antenna is external. It's one of those tiny wire antennas that snap onto the board.

      And no, it's MB not GB. :-\

      The screenshot shows it running BusyBox (https://busybox.net/). It says it can run FreeBSD as well.

    3. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks. Here is a list of uses I have for a device that has 16MB of storage capacity:

    4. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I stand corrected. People are finding ways to do things in ridiculously small amounts of disk space.

      Still, the small one doesn't really give the Pi a run for its money, which was the reason for my initial comment. After all, most folks stick a large SD card in the Pi for development, and scale back for deployment. And even then, they don't typically scale back to megabytes of storage, if only because it is basically impossible to find new stock of flash cards under about 8 GB these days. So any Pi setup you could come up with would wipe the floor with either of these RAM-wise and CPU speed-wise, and would wipe the floor with the smaller one storage-wise, too.

      It is slightly smaller and has Wi-Fi, of course, so for some purposes, it might be interesting. Still, unless space is really that critical, I'd much rather use a Pi with a cheap USB Wi-Fi nub (assuming the Pi Zero doesn't have broken USB power supply limits like the original Pi).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are finding ways to do things in ridiculously small amounts of disk space.

      Absolutely agreed with the sentiment. But man, do you ever know how to make those of us who grew up with more or less 1024 _bytes_ of RAM in our personal computers feel old, what with applying the phrase "ridiculously small" to "16 MB" and all :-/.

      Seriously though, these inexpensive ARM boards seem like a spiritual successor to the old KIM-1 / SYM-1 / etc systems of yore. They're aimed at the same sort of folks.

    6. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Taking 5 seconds to look at the kickstarter:

      There is an antenna port on the top left.
      It has a micro-SD slot on the $9 version.

    7. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by CaptainLard · · Score: 1

      Speaking of antennas...

      FCC ID: TO-BE-DETERMINED

      There goes at least a quarter of their existing funding.

    8. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      No antenna that you could fit into something the size of a cherry is likely to be decent.

      There are plenty of wifi dongles that are smaller than a cherry, and most of them work reasonably well. For many applications, smallness and cheapness are way more important than extreme range.

      I'd be surprised if a kernel with a full driver stack would even fit by itself into 16 MB of flash....

      You can easily boot basic Linux from 16MB. You just need to skinny it down by deleting all the modules and drivers that you don't need.

    9. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Ok the 1k zx81 was never that good and the 16k spectrum was pretty good fun the 512k Amiga 500 was much better and the 2 megabyte A1200 was great especially with a 52 MByte quantum fireball hard drive. 68030 cpu in the trapdoor and an additional 4 MB of ram. It got me on the internet and aminet a wonderful archive of amiga software.

      guess kids today can't comprehend running a full desktop on so little resources. It is still hard to comprehend why we now need so much.

    10. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > People are finding ways to do things in ridiculously small amounts of disk space.

      The first business computer that I was employed to work on had 2 8MB disk drives, recently upgraded from 2 x 4MB drives. The disks were 14 inch exchangeable.

      My first computer for my software development had 2 x 1MB 8 inch diskette drives. I enhanced that by adding another pair of drives. The first hard drive that I owned was 16MB.

      My current computers have ridiculously large amounts of disk space.

    11. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can easily boot basic Linux from 16MB.

      There are (or at least were) several Linux systems that would boot from a 1.44MB floppy disk. I used FreeSco on an old 80386 that had 20MB RAM, a diskette, a couple of network cards and a modem. It provided a shared internet connection, and a handful of server applications.

    12. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you fogot a link or something...
      http://openwrt.org

    13. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I had an Amiga 500 that I used to amaze people with. It had a total of 1MB of ram installed and I had a 3.5 inch floppy disk that would load the OS, a TCP/IP stack with PPP dialer and an IRC client. I could hook it to my 14.4 US Robotics courier modem, dial into my ISP and go online with IRC client. No hard drive needed all off one single floppy. Many nights hanging out in #amiga_warez on Galaxynet.

    14. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fun factoid: the Curiosity Mars rover has 256 Megabytes of RAM and 2 Gigabytes of FLASH.

      I'm sure people will be able to come up with a lot of interesting uses for one of these units.

    15. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My first machine had 16 kilobytes, so I feel your pain. :-)

      With that said, there's a huge difference between the space requirements for hand-rolled assembly code running on an 8-bit CPU and software that sits atop a modern monolithic kernel and glibc on a 32-bit (or worse, 64-bit) CPU. :-) Just saying.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by unrtst · · Score: 1

      My first computer for my software development had 2 x 1MB 8 inch diskette drives. I enhanced that by adding another pair of drives. The first hard drive that I owned was 16MB.

      I think that's the point. Holy hell, how is someone shipping something with only 16MB of storage in a new product today? Your first hard drive was probably massive for the time, but that was back when memory was measured in bytes or Kb. This thing has FOUR TIMES as much memory as storage!

      I do think it probably has some extremely good use cases, and it may eat into the Pi market a little bit, but it's not a significant overlap there.

    17. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      My PDP11 used 20kVA, with 1Mb of RAM, and three 40Mb H/Ds, but actually supported 12 users.

      I would buy some of these if they had a SCSI port.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    18. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Users? As I'm typing this I'm surrounded with electronics that do useful things, are almost general purpose computers and yet don't give me access to ANY of their storage capacity.

      And so are you.

    19. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by srl100 · · Score: 1

      Fun factoid: the Curiosity Mars rover has 256 Megabytes of RAM and 2 Gigabytes of FLASH.

      I'm sure people will be able to come up with a lot of interesting uses for one of these units.

      1) Roving around Mars, satisfying curiosity.

      2) ?

    20. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Pfft! That's all you got? Broadening the horizons of all mankind through stellar exploration by something lasting years beyond it's life originally measured in days?

      Get back to be me when you have something impressive. /runonsentence /humor

    21. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by gustygolf · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. People are finding ways to do things in ridiculously small amounts of disk space.

      Come on, an installation of Win95 took, what, under 50 megabytes? It's not really a stretch to think that you could squeeze quite a bit into 16 MB, when you don't need graphics and stuff and especially when you add disk compression to the mix.

      --
      "Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 58 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment" -- slashdot, driving users away.
    22. Re:I hope they put in an external antenna port by jnaujok · · Score: 1

      The original Omega (I own two of them) doesn't have an external antenna either, and does quite nicely without it. I have connected to it as an AP with a laptop from up to 50 feet away even through walls. That's not in a metal case or anything, but I can't complain about it at all. Now the GPS add-on without the external antenna... that's a different story.

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
  3. What kind of processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the CPU architecture? Strange information to leave out.

    1. Re:What kind of processor? by psergiu · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's in the FAQ at the end of the kickstarter page

      What SoC is used in the Omega2?
      The SoC is the MediaTek MT7688K, and the datasheet is available here: https://labs.mediatek.com/file....

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    2. Re:What kind of processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIPS then. That was my expectation. Cool.

  4. "you get..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) It doesn't exist yet. Hype does not a product make.

    2) The RaspPi is an educational tool made good by its support, not by being a superbangwhiz elite spec pro power platform. Most client computers were more than powerful enough for daily usage (excl. hyperrealistic games) a decade ago, and it's just the increasing shitness of software developers with 100,000 layers of abstraction that mean things mostly remain slow as fuck.

    1. Re:"you get..." by psergiu · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a "Omega" board that is already released by those guys.
      Supposedly available to buy at: https://onion.io/store
        (slashdotted at the moment)

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    2. Re: "you get..." by smathieson · · Score: 1

      It exista, u hace 6 of the Omega 1 boards and while they are not incredibly fast they do as promised. My home automÃtico system is running on Python in those boards.

    3. Re:"you get..." by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Exactly right for 2). There are lots of Pi-style clones out there, many of which are significantly higher spec than the Pi is. What the Pi enjoys is the community and support which means there are multiple dists, documentation, howtos, tutorials, magazines, books, peripherals, robot kits, cases etc. to use with it.

    4. Re:"you get..." by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      The best hardware in the world is useless if you have no software to run on it. - (can't recall who said that)

      Also, software aside, which one is "the best" depends on what your project is. This thing would be completely worthless for a tiny gaming system.

  5. Feature Creep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reading the description, it sounds like this thing will do anything and everything I could ever possibly want it to do; all that's needed is to either pledge more money or buy an expansion piece.

    This sounds like it's headed for disaster.

  6. Duke Nukem competitive with DOOM II by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Make that DOOM III, err, nevermind.

    I've watched enough long term KickStarters to know how this is going to go.

  7. Cost gravity at work by pieterh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good. The price of computing power falls by 50% every 18 months or so. We should see these devices settle in at a few bucks, and then keep increasing in capability. The last IoT project I did used a $20 OpenWRT router (glar150) and it was already impressive how much that little box could do.

  8. Ok so by The-Ixian · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a computer made by an onion the size of a cherry that competes with a raspberry... only in this industry...

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Ok so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh oh... This effort doesn't have anything to do with The Onion, does it?

    2. Re:Ok so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a computer made by an onion the size of a cherry that competes with a raspberry... only in this industry...

      which is why I smirked a little at the end of the summary "come into fruition."

  9. What CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another allwinner gpl-violating turd?

    1. Re:What CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another allwinner gpl-violating turd?

      MediaTek Mips

  10. 16MB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For $5 you get a 580MHz CPU, 64MB memory, 16MB storage, built-in Wi-Fi and a USB 2.0 port."

    16 MB of storage? What do they hand you a box of 3 1/2" floppies and say "Go to town!"?

    I'm sure that was meant to read 16 GB. Memory:storage ratio at 4:1 would likely only exist in tiny controller modules in a larger complex super-system.

    1. Re:16MB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, MB is correct. Many low end home routers come with 4MB flash memory and 32MB RAM. 64MB RAM and 16MB flash is generous compared to the device which might handle your Wifi.

    2. Re:16MB storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ESP8266 is an Arduino-like device that carries builtin WiFi and in small quantities comes in at under $4 each. It can be programmed in LUA or Arduino's C/C++-like programming language and can serve either as an Internet client or server - including as a small web server all in a package about 3x2 cm, depending on which kind of circuit board it comes mounted on. It has a LOT less memory and CPU speed than the Onion - only 64KiB for code and 96KiB for data.

      You can't run Linux on it, but you can have a lot of fun. Heck, the old CP/M systems would have been really fat and happy with that much RAM. And they didn't have builtin WiFi!

  11. It makes the Raspberry PI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look like daylight robbery. That is quite a lot, in a very tiny package, at only $5.

    1. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by psergiu · · Score: 1

      Read the storage & RAM sizes again.
      Values are in MEGA not Giga :-)
      It's just a very cheap OpenWRT box.

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    2. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Pi Zero costs the same and has a much faster CPU, 8x the RAM, support for external storage, HDMI video output, nearly three times as many GPIO pins, and its USB/HDMI/Power/Camera ports/sockets are already populated with connectors. How exactly does the Pi "look like daylight robbery"? The only advantage that the Omega2 seems to have is built-in networking support.

      I'll be the first to admit that these devices are serving very different purposes (the Omega2 seems to want to be a network-enabled arduino), but it hardly makes the Zero seem like a poor value considering the Zero is so much more powerful/capable.

    3. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you cant FIND Pi-Zeros and so they effectively don't exist for most of the interested market?

    4. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Because you cant FIND Pi-Zeros and so they effectively don't exist for most of the interested market?

      These are not available yet either. The difference is that I have some degree of confidence that the Pi foundation will eventually produce zeros in enough quantity to satisfy demand...

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    5. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're not looking very hard, then. Lots of places have them in stock:

      http://whereismypizero.com/

    6. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pi Zero can fit those things on the board, because it is a BIGGER board. Granted, for most usage cases where you would fit this little thing, a Pi Zero would probably fit as well, but this is the format they have chosen - extra tiny.

    7. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Pi Zero costs the same and has a much faster CPU, 8x the RAM, support for external storage, HDMI video output, nearly three times as many GPIO pins, and its USB/HDMI/Power/Camera ports/sockets are already populated with connectors.

      so, "...Lame?"

    8. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The Pi Zero is a limited edition part that exists because Broadcom wants to clear inventory of the crappy old SoC that the original Pi used. It's not really a fair comparison. Nevertheless, a MIPS 24k is something that really should be avoided like the plague. It's MIPS32r2 and all of the current ImagTec-funded development effort (compiler, OS support) is on MIPS{64,32}r6, which is not backwards compatible. The entire MIPS ecosystem is a clusterfuck at the moment.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pi Zero's camera port is not populated actually, and it only takes power over the USB port so the aux power port isn't populated either. Still, it is bloody amazing at the price.

      Meanwhile, for most of the Omega 2's applications, an ESP2866 will do the job, and they cost like $3 and are actually available.

    10. Re:It makes the Raspberry PI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "at the moment" ...

      I cried tears of joy when Sony finally abandoned MIPS and put a PPC into the PS3.

      Those tears of joy quickly became tears of pain though.

      Then tears of joy again, when they put an x64 into the PS4 :)

  12. Note that it's not their first board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The original Omega was based on the Atheros AR9331 chip that is also used in many low end home routers. Solid choice. There's OpenWRT for lots of these devices, for example the Gl.iNet 6416A or its successor, the AR150, and these also come with GPIOs. These systems are in a different league from the Raspberry Pi, but at least they don't connect the LAN through the USB port.

  13. "Full" linux distro by nwaack · · Score: 1

    Running a full linux distro on 64MB of RAM? That's gonna be one lean distro!

    1. Re:"Full" linux distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:"Full" linux distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      64MB RAM is all you'll ever need

    3. Re:"Full" linux distro by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Son, that's nothing.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  14. Doesn't look like a complete scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh, at $5 you get a pretty basic SOC with no external storage (i.e. microsd support), and will need a breakout board to do any sort of display out or USB interfacing. That's entirely possible when you look at the other offerings on the market and maybe even skews towards being a no so great deal.

    1. Re:Doesn't look like a complete scam by psergiu · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only Display Out available at the moment for this device is a tiny I2C LCD.
      You will need to pay extra $15 for the expansion dock and $15 for the tiny LCD module.
      No option for Composite / VGA / HDMI / LVDS / anything

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  15. One thing I'd love to see... by grub · · Score: 3, Interesting


    One thing I'd love to see in all these devices is Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) as their power source rather than needing a wall-wart to power them. Would be great to have one cable for the entire device.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:One thing I'd love to see... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Adding a PoE module significantly raises the cost. The Raspberry Pi PoE hat is $42 USD. I know its not cheap for Arduino either. What makes it so these boards need such expensive power converters?

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:One thing I'd love to see... by brantondaveperson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      PoE for a tiny device like this, with built-in wireless, doesn't really make any sense. What makes sense is to stop trying to cram Linux into these things, and design them for low-power usage from the ground up. These are so-called "Internet of Things" devices, and will be single-purpose embedded systems. You do not need Linux to do that, it just gets in the way. I wonder how much current it needs to run, and how long it'll last on batteries, and whether or not it has any low power modes.

    3. Re:One thing I'd love to see... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It doesn't get in the way.

      Well more specifically, it uses up a lot of space memory wise and a relatively large amount of power. However, general development is way, way easier on Linux than a smaller platform, unless you're doing real-time bit banging. As soon as you hit "oh and then I want to some data from a server", it's 1 line in Linux, compared to many on deeper embedded platforms.

      Plus, you get familiarity of tools.

      You won't ever hit the smallest, cheapest, lowest power systems running Linux, but then they're trying to appeal to a broader crowd than embedded devs who already own a copy of IAR.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    4. Re:One thing I'd love to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 1 line of C when you're running on an ESP2866 too, and those can maintain a WiFi connection at 5mW.

      Sorry, you just don't know what you're talking about.

    5. Re:One thing I'd love to see... by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tell me about it. Why run Linux when you can run Windows 10 IoT edition.

    6. Re:One thing I'd love to see... by LienRag · · Score: 1

      Especially since the development of RIOT OS specifically for these devices...

  16. Installing a 3ware RAID card on your $5 picoboard? by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > I'd be surprised if a kernel with a full driver stack would even fit by itself into 16 MB of flash

    The full Redhat kernel and initrd is about 16MB - and contains drivers for most of the hardware Linux supports - RAID cards from 20 years ago, fibre channel, tons of network cards, etc. I'm pretty sure you won't be plugging a PCI-X RAID card into this $5 board, so why would you include those drivers in the boot image?

    As someone else said, OpenWRT is pretty popular, and it's about 6MB.

  17. 580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by phorm · · Score: 1

    According to the Spec sheet listed for the MediaTek MT7688, the CPU is only 580Mhz and it uses DDR1 RAM. That sounds a fair bit slower than even the Pi Zero

    1. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Ah... too bad they aren't using the Celeron 300A (malaysia fab plant?).... I heard you could OC those a fair bit ;)

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by onionomega · · Score: 1

      According to the Spec sheet listed for the MediaTek MT7688, the CPU is only 580Mhz and it uses DDR1 RAM. That sounds a fair bit slower than even the Pi Zero

      We use DDR2 :)

    3. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You sure as fuck did not read the spec sheet. Section 4.8.1 - DDR2 SDRAM INTERFACE, PAGE 35.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by phorm · · Score: 1

      You mean the one they link from the section entitled "What SoC is used in the Omega2?", with the description "The SoC is the MediaTek MT7688K, and the datasheet is available here"

      I sure as fuck did. As per "Section 2 - Main Features", the KN supposedly only supported 64MB (MB, what?) of DDR1, whereas the AN supported 2GB of DDR1/DDR2 at 193Mhz.

    5. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, you sure as fuck did NOT. FROM YOUR EXACT LINK have a goddamned screencapture.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also mentioned section 2 (main features). Perhaps you could take the time to read that one instead of screenshotting the "Maximum ratings" section.

      The PDF file states that there are two models of the "MT7688", there's a "MT7688KN" and a "MT7688AN". As I mentioned, only the AN model is listed as having DDR2. The KN has an "N/A" in that row.

      Other sections of the spreadsheet - such as ratings - would apply only to the features available on the given model.

      Now back to the kickstarted, where they link the PDF in section "What SoC is used in the Omega2?" and clearly state "The SoC is the MediaTek MT7688K"

      So yes, if the Omega2 was using a MT7688AN, then the DDR2 ratings might apply. Since the SOC is supposedly a MT7688K, no DDR2, and that section of "Maximum ratings" (what you screenshotted) does NOT apply.

      To summarize

      * NT7688 has two models (AN/KN)
      * PDF covers BOTH models
      * Kickstarter says Omega2 has MT7688K model SOC (assume this means KN)
      * PDF says no DDR2 in KNmodel, only in AN
      * Other sections provide ratings for DDR2 but likely only apply to the AN variant that actually has said parts

      So thanks for the "goddamn screen capture." Perhaps next time you could include some reading comprehension and actually look at the section I noted before you blow your top, it probably would have taken less time. While your at it, please take your Ritalin and calm down a bit.

      thanks!

    7. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Yes, I also mentioned section 2 (main features). Perhaps you could take the time to read that one instead of screenshotting the "Maximum ratings" section."

      Zero reason to do that when the actual product manufacturer comes into this very thread and says "We use DDR2."

      Not my fault you bothered talking without reading EVERYTHING, first, including the developer, who was here in this very comment section.

      THANKS!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:580 Mhz CPU and DDR1? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I want a little bit more to go on than a random Slashdot comment saying "We use DDR2".I did see that comment, but - having been burned before - tend to believe the actual product literature.

      Nice deflection though. Rage on me for not reading the sheet correctly, get corrected in that I *have* done so, and then fall back to a 3-word comment made previously. If you want to believe that, feel free, but I believe you were attempting to tear-me a new a-hole for not having read the spec sheet, which I obviously did.

  18. only 5 dollars but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 dollar addon
    15 dollar addon
    30 dollar addon

  19. The big question - SUPPORT! by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Rpi isn't the cheapest board out there. There are many cheaper ones, many offering faster processors, more cores, built-in WiFi, etc.

    Bang per buck, you can do better than Rpi. Even the Zero.

    But what the Rpi does have over everyone else? Community and long-term support. The other cheaper boards often only release an ancient kernel and that's it - nothing more. Yes they can run Android, but the only one they release code for is Android 4. And if the driver is buggy, you're SOL - no one's fixing it.

    But the Rpi community is what makes the Rpi the better board - there's lot of support, lots of people are keeping a maintained kernel for it, and drivers are actively being developed and debugged.

    How's this board compare? What are they doing to ensure long-term viability of their hardware? Or are they going to build them all, then go onto the next generation, forgetting about what's out there already?

    1. Re:The big question - SUPPORT! by youngone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But what the Rpi does have over everyone else? Community and long-term support...

      I came here to say exactly this.

      I'm not much of a programmer, I can mess about with bash and a bit of Python if I'm forced to, and do you know what?

      With a Raspberry Pi I can always find guidance to do exactly what I want, with the skills I have, written by some clever person who has made their knowledge available.

      That just makes the Raspberry Pi better value.

    2. Re:The big question - SUPPORT! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There could be a market for something like this, between an Arduino and a Pi, with wifi. A lot of projects end up adding wifi, and both the Arduino and Pi suck for low power operation.

      As you say, it really depends on how they support if. If they can get a really good, low power OS and tools out they could be on to a winner.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:The big question - SUPPORT! by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Yes - thankyou! I'm just going to link to this post every time someone thinks they're being really clever by pointing out yet another small device that beats RPi in some specific way. The RPi is a massive compromise, but a very well understood, documented and flexible thing.

    4. Re:The big question - SUPPORT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are they doing to ensure long-term viability of their hardware?

      A particularly pertinent question given that when I went to the Onion website to try and buy an Omega 1, they don't even sell it. They don't have any information on it at all on their entire website. It looks like they built the Kickstarter batch and then moved immediately to the Omega 2. Even when you click Products -> Omega it just takes you to the Omega 2 Kickstarter page.

  20. Nope by FryingLizard · · Score: 1

    Not impressed - too little storage to do much of use easily. "Easily" being the active word here; sure I've programmed lots of things with less Flash than that but it's about ease of use in a linux environment. A few meg is no fun at all to work with when there's the _potential_ for installing a ton of nice packages but you'll run out of space instantly.
    Get a C.H.I.P. ($9) which uses a much more capable CPU (Allwinner H3) also has wifi & BT but vastly more RAM and (especially) Flash, more i/o, it's streets ahead. Or an Orange Pi (good) or a Banana Pi (personal fave but a bit long in the tooth now; but has Gig-E, SATA, 3x USB host ports etc)...

    Saving the price of a latte to get something vastly inferior to the above options isn't worth the sweat IMO.

    --
    [FrLz]
    1. Re:Nope by Lorens · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you want to do. If you have an IoT product to develop, this could be exactly what you want at its heart. If you're looking for the smallest cheapest silent but-still-powerful Linux machine to play around with, this one is probably not for you.

    2. Re:Nope by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you want to do. If you have an IoT product to develop, this could be exactly what you want at its heart.

      If you have an IoT product in mind, this is the last thing you want. I do this for a living. The problem with this thing is that it takes too much development effort to shave a few bucks off the unit cost. That extra effort translates into longer time to market. While you are loosing precious months trying to get your OS running with everything you need in a tiny memory footprint, another up-and-coming startup built a product around one of the other SBCs out there that isn't vastly under-powered. They beat you to market by 6 months with a product that only costs $5 more than yours, and you suddenly find your brilliant IoT product just got flushed down the loo because you couldn't execute a viable business plan.

      Time to market is huge in this day and age. Just ask Intel and Microsoft how their IoT plans are rolling out, and you'll find out real quick that even a superior product at a lower price point will have a hard time competing when you're late to the party.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    3. Re:Nope by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      If you do this for a living then I suspect you don't make a very good living.

      This isn't for commercial enterprises to bring product to market nor does this burden anyone with losing "precious months" getting an OS running nor is the processor in this inherently "vastly under-powered" nor does $5 dollars of BOM cost translate only into $5 in product cost. None of your points indicate that you understand what a "viable business plan" is.

      No one is late to the IoT party yet. It's not clear there's even going to be one.

    4. Re:Nope by geoskd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No one is late to the IoT party yet. It's not clear there's even going to be one.

      By the time these kinds of trends have a dopey name, the party has already started. If you didn't already have an IoT product well under development by now, its already too late because all the players that will be successful, in what people are calling the IoT, already have a product at or near market release.

      These guys with the kickstarter want to start a business, otherwise they wouldn't be putting the energy into this. The problem they face is that they are trying to enter an already saturated market with a product that has no real differentiation from the market. In the low volumes they will likely be able to sell, and facing competition from the Raspberry Pi foundation who are a not for profit in a saturated market, They will be roadkill in 2 years. Even an established player like Intel is getting rogered good in this market. In two years they have gotten just a few thousand supporter. There is some reason to believe they are funding the production of promised units through future donations. Even if they are on the up and up so far, they do not have a clear path to profitability. Even if their unit cost is $0, they have so far sold just 10,000 units per year. That amounts to $50,000 per year in income. Thats barely enough to keep 1 person gainfully employed. In order to be remotely successful, with a profit margin of $1 per unit, they would need to sell hundreds of thousands of units. Even if by some miracle they do managed to sell 100k units per year for two years, in two years their product is completely obsolete, and if they haven't spent a huge percentage of that money developing the next generation, they sink like a rock.

      The only way to avoid that fate is to manage to sell millions of units with at least a few dollar per unit of profit margin.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    5. Re:Nope by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you want to do. If you have an IoT product to develop, this could be exactly what you want at its heart.

      If you have an IoT product in mind, this is the last thing you want. I do this for a living. The problem with this thing is that it takes too much development effort to shave a few bucks off the unit cost. That extra effort translates into longer time to market. While you are loosing precious months trying to get your OS running with everything you need in a tiny memory footprint, another up-and-coming startup built a product around one of the other SBCs out there that isn't vastly under-powered. They beat you to market by 6 months with a product that only costs $5 more than yours, and you suddenly find your brilliant IoT product just got flushed down the loo because you couldn't execute a viable business plan.

      Time to market is huge in this day and age. Just ask Intel and Microsoft how their IoT plans are rolling out, and you'll find out real quick that even a superior product at a lower price point will have a hard time competing when you're late to the party.

      This is exactly backwards (which probably explains why IoT is almost a decade old and has yet to find any legs).

      In the embedded space a saving of a few cents per unit can mean the difference between failure and success. If your goal is to chase venture capital/funding, then certainly you want quick time to market, but if your goal is to sell units and make a profit on each one then an extra two or three months getting your product cost-competitive is better.

      For things like IoT you may *think* that adding $5 on top of the price of a unit is fine as long as you are first to market, but in reality when the consumer wants to buy 20 of them to outfit a building they're going to go with your competitor who spent the extra two-three months.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    6. Re:Nope by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      No one is late to the IoT party yet. It's not clear there's even going to be one.

      By the time these kinds of trends have a dopey name, the party has already started. If you didn't already have an IoT product well under development by now, its already too late because all the players that will be successful, in what people are calling the IoT, already have a product at or near market release.

      IoT is almost a decade old at this point. If there was a party nobody noticed.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    7. Re:Nope by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You are in principle right, but your argument is wrong.
      For things like IoT you may *think* that adding $5 on top of the price of a unit is fine as long as you are first to market, but in reality when the consumer wants to buy 20 of them to outfit a building they're going to go with your competitor who spent the extra two-three months.
      The price on the market is close to irrelevant. People buy by features and quality. When I buy stuff that I expect to last 30years or longer, $5 more costs might he worth it. Especially when we have to consider the time and cost to install them and get them up and running.
      The difference in production cost is _rarely_ forwarded to the customer. How ever I like to safe perhaps a $1 or even $5 in production for one reason: if I sell 10million units per year and safe $5 on each, that is 50million more earnings!
      Some things get sold in 100 millions chunks, so even 10cents saving add up to $10 million more profit!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  21. Based on Kickstarted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the success of the Kickstarter campaign is any indication.

    HA! Since when has this been any indication of long term success?

    1. Re:Based on Kickstarted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the success of the Kickstarter campaign is any indication.

      HA! Since when has this been any indication of long term success?

      Espruino for example. Successful kickstarter campaigns and still going strong and growing.

  22. Can the WiFi do monitor mode? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    I ask, because these tiny, fully integrated and inexpensive devices look like very inexpensive, and easily concealed WPA password crackers, or network listening devices to me.

    The one with the sdcard slot could be made to do quite a few things, if you don't mind wearing out the card using it for swap space. A combination of zram and sdcard spillover swap, some sensors, and an ext data partition on the card would let this thing do quite a lot, such as sticking it on the back of a USB printer to make the printer network enabled, to running an electronic door control, camera monitoring (using vfl capable cameras), making WiFi driven toy cars or drones, and quite a few others.

    For many things, you don't need a whole lot of power. I have used an old router as a pvpgn server for some time, in fact. Works fine.

    For a lot of possible projects, physical size of the package and power draw are the obstacles, not the memory size or the processor.

  23. Coming soon... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Ruby, C++, Python, PHP, Perl, JavaScript (Node.js), and Bash programming languages

    And soon, PowerShell!!!

    1. Re:Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you weren't being eye-rollingly sarcastic... it runs linux.. no fucking shit it supports all of that. I really want to punch someone.

      (and also, this is way way way more powerful than the linux machine I was using not too long ago... 14 years? (486DX 120 with maybe 16mb memory)

  24. 680 kB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is all that Bill Gates said that we really need.

    1. Re: 680 kB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For RAM, not storage.

    2. Re: 680 kB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was 640 KB, you morons.

  25. So what? Get C.H.I.P. by stiebing.ja · · Score: 1

    because Chip Has Incredible Possibilities and C.H.I.P. is only slightly larger and only $9 and has Bluetooth onboard.

    --
    I lag
    1. Re:So what? Get C.H.I.P. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      C.H.I.P ($9) is a bit like the Omega2 ($5) + Expansion Dock ($15), except half the price and you get more RAM, more Flash, more GPIOs and more peripherals. And the C.H.I.P is a bit smaller than an Omega2+Dock, but not as small as the Omega2 alone.

      I'll stick with the C.H.I.P. for now. Although I urge anyone thinking of getting one to skip the PocketCHIP and get the HDMI, VGA, or hook up a SPI LCD instead. There are lots of 320x240 SPI LCDs for around $8 or less on ebay and aliexpress.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:So what? Get C.H.I.P. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because i'm still waiting to get my C.H.I.P. It's been on backorder for 2 months

  26. KEEP FBI DEBIAN OFF OF IT AND YOU ARE OK --- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >For the BSD fans out there, the Omega2 also runs FreeBSD!

    That is the best part. There is no need to remote control it from anywhere. Stupid feature, especially at $5.

    So just shitcan all of the remote shit.. put FreeBSD on it.. boom. Awesome. Kind of slow as far as cycles.. but still useful.
    ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.0/

    arm images available.

    1. Re:KEEP FBI DEBIAN OFF OF IT AND YOU ARE OK --- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of this for free!
      https://www.freebsd.org/ports/categories-alpha.html

      FUCKING SWEET!

      That little PC for $5 smokes anything Windows has because it an be secured.

  27. Re:Installing a 3ware RAID card on your $5 picoboa by Anon-Admin · · Score: 1

    If you recompile the linux kernel, eliminate the loadable kernel modules and only compile in the drivers for the hardware it will be running on, then you can get it down to below 2MB

  28. C.H.I.P. is $9 w/ WiFi, 1GHz, 4GB Flash, 512M RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The C.H.I.P. at $9 is a much better value for the cost in my opinion.
    All you need is a USB cable and it has real horsepower, built-in WiFi and much more storage.
    Great solution for small connected controllers.

  29. Just to put this into perspective ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I remember buying my first tower PC, a 4000$ Cyrix P200+ with 150Mhz Clock on a Tomato Board with astonishing 75Mhz clock and 32 MB of memory, including a Matrox Mystique GFX Card with 2 MB of memory back in 1996. At the time it was the most powerful standard PC available, and the first to sport a CPU that needed fan cooling.

    Looking at this with that in mind and seeing how far we've come amazes me.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Just to put this into perspective ... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      ...and ten years before that, we had sub 1 MHz clock speeds. Kids these days don't appreciate what they got. Now get off my lawn!

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  30. Urgh, ImgTec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how they got to my email as an (uknown sender) spamming me about the Onion, but they sure have nasty marketing practices.

  31. for $5 dollars you MAY Get .... eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but The similarly priced Raspberry Pi you can buy immediately and get within a few days.

  32. Omega 13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the Omega 13.

    It runs code so fast, it can branch-predict 13 seconds into the future!

  33. Re:Installing a 3ware RAID card on your $5 picoboa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, OpenWRT appear to more-or-less ignore platforms with less than 4MB because of tight constraints. (Even though, in some cases, you could stick a bootloader in there and boot off of, for example, USB stick)

  34. PoE is a bad (expensive) standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're entirely right about calling for power delivery over Ethernet, but alas the PoE standard isn't likely to be bringing that into common use. The PoE spec is far too expensive to implement, and price is a killer in the Raspberry Pi or Beaglebone meme spaces and in all of IoT / M2M.

    The only way you're going to get your power arriving over Ethernet lines at a sensible price is if someone else comes up with an alternative specification, one less suited to industrial Cisco routers and better suited to home use.

  35. The Onion by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    First they made America's finest news source. Then they invented the Gillete Fusion 5 blade razor. After that, they made a routing protocol. Now they are make a computer?

    Interesting, but quite frankly I liked them better when they made news for nerds and stuff that matters.

  36. Wait a second! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    With "only" 16MB of flash memory, how do you get Systemd on it?! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  37. Obligatory comedy sketch by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1
    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  38. Is anyone else amazed by MarkH · · Score: 1

    That a pint of beer - Basically 500ml of water with a dash of alcohol and some bubbles - now costs the same as a beautiful, intricate and tiny computer.

  39. viking lander memory by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Viking lander
    2K ROM
    2K RAM
    Storage was stainless steel, not ferrite, tape, just like the first recorders that Hitler used for speeches. (really).

    http://history.nasa.gov/comput...

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  40. Oooh! It runs Apps! by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Oooh! Reading the kickstarter page, there's a whole section on how it runs Apps!

    I bet the Appy Apps guy is just thrilled!

  41. Not the same class of device as the Pi by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    This is on a different playing field than the Pi Zero.

    On the one hand, the Pi Zero can run a full desktop Linux distribution. On the other hand,the $5 price is just a starting point. At the very least you have to add a MicroSD card to be able to use it, bringing the bill closer to $10. And if you need any kind of networking that's also extra.

    The Omega2 includes WiFi and flash onboard. But the tiny amounts of RAM and flash mean that you're limited to distros that are intended solely for embedded applicatoins. (The one provided with it is based on OpenWRT, a distro that is mostly used to replace the firmware in wireless routers.) But if your application can fit within those constraints, $5 is really all you have to spend on it. It's strictly an embedded systems play, unlike the Pi Zero which can be used in a wider variety of applications.

  42. But can it run a spell checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much for just the mircoSD slot?