Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Wants To Pay You To Use Its Windows 10 Browser Edge (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report by The Guardian: Microsoft has a new browser. It launched with Windows 10 and it's called Edge. The company says it's faster, more battery efficient and all-round better than Chrome or Firefox. You can even draw on websites with a stylus. Trouble is, not very many people are using it. So now Microsoft's trying to bribe you to switch. The newly rebranded Microsoft Rewards -- formerly Bing Rewards, which paid people for using Bing as their search engine (another product Microsoft says is better than a Google product but that very few people actually use) -- will now pay you for using Edge, shopping at the Microsoft store, or using Bing. Users of Edge who sign up to Microsoft Rewards, which is currently US-only, are then awarded points simply for using the browser. Microsoft actively monitors whether you're using Edge for up to 30 hours a month. It tracks mouse movements and other signs that you're not trying to game the system, and you must also have Bing set as your default search engine. Points can then be traded in for vouchers or credit for places such as Starbucks, Skype, Amazon and ad-free Outlook.com -- remember, if you're not paying for something, you are the product.

40 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Worldwide news are always US only. by MindPrison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What else is new? Every banner for every campaign I've ever seen, every special offer, every 100s spam mail I get from anyone, MS or otherwise, is always "US" only when you read the fine print.

    Can we get a "US" news filter here so we can filter out the news that have offers only exlusive to US citizens? Please?

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Worldwide news are always US only. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      How would that work? Does it require someone to read through the fine print of every offer presented in every story and manually tag whether or not that story contains US-only news? When The Guardian reports on a US-only story, it doesn't sound like that process can be reliably automated.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well that's your perspective, and it's not a terribly accurate one. The entire global technology infrastructure begins and ends with the United States. Oh but you think your Intel chip us made in Singapore because it says made in Singapore on it? Try again: The chip was fabricated in the US (specifically, Chandler Arizona) and was just packaged in Singapore. Intel, AMD, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, Facebook.... All US companies.

      Android and iOS make up 99% of the global smartphone market.

      But not just information technology... Name any health condition you can think of, and chances are the top hospital for that condition resides somewhere in the US. Cancer, pediatrics, cardiology, neurology...

      The same is true of other fields as well, such as aerospace.

      We're not somehow backwards just because don't use fucking metric. We don't use it mainly because we haven't felt a pressing need for it, much like some countries drive on the left side of the road, which itself comes from feudal times when you would always pass on the left so that you could unsheathe your weapon from your right hand and have it ready for combat in case you passed an adversary.

      Pigs and backwoods? Your thinking of somewhere else.

    3. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're not somehow backwards just because don't use fucking metric.

      Well, umm, actually we are. The only countries in the world that don't use the metric system are the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar.

      So yes, we're about as backwards as it gets in that respect.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Worldwide news are always US only. by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Pfft this is Slashdot. Even the editors can't be bothered to RTFA.

    5. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      The entire global technology infrastructure begins and ends with the United States. [...] Intel, AMD, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, Facebook.... All US companies.

      That looks like a reasonable list of most of the biggest US companies in computing today. You might have added a few more, notably Amazon, and perhaps the big PC manufacturers like Dell.

      However, for their size and resources, many of these companies have done remarkably little to advance technology infrastructure in the last few years. Almost all of them became big on the back of a small number of very successful products or services, but many of their more recent attempts to diversify have failed horribly. Today they mostly survive because they're so huge that they can afford to buy almost any other business that is actually innovative and potentially disruptive to their market dominance, and that's also how a lot of "their" innovation happens. Most of them are going to be in trouble if one or two geee that lay golden eggs die, and in several cases there are warning signs already.

      Meanwhile, you kind of forgot all the Asian giants and quite a few European companies that actually make most of those smartphones you mentioned, not to mention many of the household appliances we buy, huge amounts of telecomms infrastructure, huge amounts of transportation tech...

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    6. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      you're confused, the USA does use the metric system where it makes sense. and "metric countries" like the UK use english measurements for many things, like railroads using miles, cars using miles and gallons and miles per gallon, people weighing themselves in "stones", beer by the pint, etc. etc.

  2. Reeks of desperation by clubby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is what you do when you can't make a better product for your user base; you make a better product for those who prey upon you user base, bill the predators, and if not enough victims show up, you up the incentive.

    1. Re:Reeks of desperation by Sowelu · · Score: 2

      They're pretty darn close, if you use Amazon for cheap household necessities like a lot of people do.

    2. Re:Reeks of desperation by ranton · · Score: 2

      Also, cash and Amazon gift cards aren't quite the same thing.

      Physical cash is starting to have the same relationship to money as a picture of a 3.5" floppy disk has to saving data. It isn't completely phased out, but its really close for any affluent enough to have a credit card. For instance less than 3% of my spending is done with cash, and its only that high because my wife loves estate sales.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    3. Re:Reeks of desperation by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And people wonder why the local stores are going out of business. From people too lazy to get out of their mom's basement. If the reward is only for Amazon cards, or Starbucks cards, it is NOT because the reward has an equivalent cash value but because there's a kickback to drive people to those stores. To bad you can't send that $100 card to Amazon and get a $100 bill back in the mail.

      This is why when there's a class action judgement that the penalties are often paid out as coupons beause they're cheaper than cash.

  3. Bing It by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use Bing because I find it to be as good as Google or better for searches (especially image/video searches) and maps.
    The fact that they pay me to use it is a bonus.

    They'd have to pay me a LOT more to use Edge, however. And make Edge available for Windows 7, because fuck Windows 10.

    1. Re:Bing It by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why don't you use duckduckgo or some other search engine that doesn't violate your privacy by tracking you?

    2. Re:Bing It by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      What?!

      I wouldn't fuck Windows 10 if they gave it away for FREE!!!

      Oh wait...

    3. Re:Bing It by internerdj · · Score: 2

      I've been doing my daily number of required searches for the Bing rewards program for a while. I can usually get fairly helpful answers for everyday things, but when I start diving deep into technical problems it is beyond useless. As for me being the product, what major search engine can I use that isn't mining my searches for profit?

    4. Re:Bing It by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      As for me being the product, what major search engine can I use that isn't mining my searches for profit?

      See: https://www.privacytools.io/#s...

      If you're too lazy to click, it says DuckDuckGo, Disconnect Search, MetaGer and ixquick.

    5. Re:Bing It by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sucks for porn.

      Not if you understand the wonderful DDG bang commands.

      !bi my fetish

      Search Bing images, the best porn image search, without having to go to Bing's eye-damaging front page. There are many cool ! commands, including !wa to search Wolfram Alpha, the world's best online calculator.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Bing It by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

      I use Bing because I find it to be as good as Google or better for searches (especially image/video searches) and maps.

      This is demonstrably false. As soon as you look for something even remotely rare where Google finds only 5-10 matches, Bing finds 0. I've done this experiment innumerable times.

      Some examples:

      Search for "tig welding" "cantilever" "bronze"
      Google: 491000 results
      Bing: 3150 results

      Search for "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat"
      Google: 1150 results
      Bing: 58 results (none of which very relevant)

      search for "ion scavenger" "fluorescein"
      Google: 192 results
      Bing: 23 results

      Search for "osmosis" "peristalsis" "cowboy bebop"
      Google: 34 results
      Bing: 1 result!

      Finally... search for "forked code" "bonded" "lap"
      Google: 4 results
      Bing: fuckall

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    7. Re:Bing It by Nunya666 · · Score: 2

      DuckDuckGo kind of sucks as a search engine, though. The results even on the first page are not always relevant.

      So pick your poison: MS crap, Google's track-everything-you-do, or DDG that works 90% of the time (for me, at least).

      I choose DDG. When the search results don't answer my question, then I run the same search in Google.

    8. Re:Bing It by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Funny

      "tig welding" "cantilever" "bronze"
      "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat"
      "ion scavenger" "fluorescein"
      "osmosis" "peristalsis" "cowboy bebop"
      "forked code" "bonded" "lap"

      You either have the worlds most amazing Saturday nights, or the most terrifying.

    9. Re:Bing It by CrashNBrn · · Score: 2
      Except Google is lying to you. There actually aren't 1150 results for "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat"
      Click on page 15 of the results

      Your search - "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat" - did not match any documents.

      Suggestions:

      * Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
      * Try different keywords.
      * Try more general keywords.
      * Try fewer keywords.

      Search Results

      In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 129 already displayed.

  4. Ehh maybe halfway? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 2

    They've put a lot of work into Edge. Now that it supports extensions and has Adblock, it may even be good enough to use regularly. It sounds unlikely but it's not without possibility that it is better than Chrome in perf.

    But Bing? They're nuts. The search results are measurably worse and the user experience is lacking advanced features that makes Google so powerful.

    1. Re:Ehh maybe halfway? by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Now that it supports extensions and has Adblock

      Sweet! So it's on par with what other browsers have had with years or in the case of Firefox, over a decade.

  5. Re:Bah Humbug! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fuck Micro$oft!!!

    I will not. Have you seen how many viruses they have?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  6. Trust busting by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Setting aside the privacy implications of this (at this point, anyone who thinks they aren't being bagged n' tagged when using Windows 10 is either woefully naive or incredibly stupid), I think this warrants another antitrust investigation into Microsoft's behavior.

    Microsoft's OS will silently and without permission uninstall programs that compete with the ones shipped with Windows 10, such as Firefox and Chrome. Or sometimes it will just silently and without permission change your default web browser back to Edge. The reason for this is because Edge's default search engine is Bing, which gives money to Microsoft via personalized advertisement brokering. And now they're locking in Edge, Bing, and the Windows Store so the user is given some menial rewards for using the three lock-in-step.

    When a company uses its monopoly or near-monopoly on one platform (e.g. desktop OS) in order to break into other platforms (e.g. web browsers, search engines, app stores), and rewards users for obeying or inconveniences/punishes users for not obeying, that's called abuse. It is far worse than AT&T bundling free phones with their service, and that got them split up into multiple companies. And it's several steps advanced from the original case that Microsoft was convicted for, which was bundling Internet Explorer with Windows 95.

  7. Browser Turing Test . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It tracks mouse movements and other signs that you're not trying to game the system

    This sounds like a challenge to me. Can you write a bot that can fool the Edge bot detection system . . . ?

    Search on a tech topic. Open the StackOverflow result. Take some time, and follow some of the links to death.

    In another tab, search for porn, and follow the links.

    Hey presto! Normal user browser behavior!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  8. Reason I don't use Bing... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Bing as their search engine (another product Microsoft says is better than a Google product but that very few people actually use...

    The Bing spider did not follow the instructions (about which subdirectories to skip) I gave it in the robots.txt file on my website.

    .
    I sent logs and my robots.txt to Bing's support team, and got back an answer along the lines of, ~yeah, we know that sometimes it doesn't follow robots.txt, that's your problem to solve~.

    If Microsoft thinks their search spider is so "special" that it need not follow the instructions I give it for my websites, then I don't want anything to do with Bing.

    1. Re:Reason I don't use Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      it sounds like you think microsoft are a bunch of selfish pricks who don't give fig for standards of behaviour, standards for technology or standards in general. I'm shocked.

    2. Re:Reason I don't use Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BingBot was hitting my site for invalid urls - changing case. And I was getting hit thousands of times a day. It wasn't like they were hitting old urls - they literally changed the case on the URL and my server was properly returning a 404. This went on for weeks until I opened a support ticket and then it finally stopped some weeks after that. What a shit bot.

  9. Another use for my Arduino by raymorris · · Score: 3, Funny

    Once I had a system where the power management (sleep) couldn't be turned off, and we wanted to use it for digital signage. So in about eight lines of code I turned an Arduino into a USB mouse and set it to wiggle the cursor every 5 minutes, thereby preventing the system from going to sleep.

    Later, I wanted to wanted to guess someone's PIN number over night, so with a few lines of code I set the Arduino to act as a USB keyboard and type in every possible PIN, waiting a few seconds between tries.

    Now, Microsoft is willing to pay me to wiggle a mouse around and occasionally click. Hmm ... :)

  10. Re:Still nope! by Bugler412 · · Score: 2

    so just like Chrome then?

  11. Re:You mean a ... by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    It says a lot about the state of US news consumers if you think an advertisement for a brand loyalty program is "hard news."

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  12. Re:Even paid by jimbob6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if it were a 9 foot pole that just says 10 on it?

  13. I'm noticing a trend... by Immerman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows 10: free*
    Edge: we'll pay *you*

    Could it be that the price of Microsoft products are finally approaching their actual value?

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    1. Re:I'm noticing a trend... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Step 3 is, "We'll pay you in bitcoins so you can buy heroin on the dark net."

      Step 4 is, "We'll send you heroin by drone."

      Step 5 is, "Windows 11 is $5000/month and comes with free heroin."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:I'm noticing a trend... by Altrag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on what you define as their "products."

      Windows 10 is only "free" if you had a (recent) prior version of Windows. Sure there will be a few lost sales but the vast majority of people don't "upgrade" their OS until their PC breaks and the new version comes with their new PC.

      And in turn they reduce their support costs significantly (they can justify EOLing Win7/8 much sooner if you've been given every incentive to upgrade already.) And of course they can leverage any new "features" in Win10 as an ad platform to generate third party compensation. They probably didn't expect quite as much backlash against Win10s intrusiveness but even with that, I'm guessing they're not hurting too much from the giveaway.

      As for Bing and Edge. That's a much more direct and obvious bribe attempt. Microsoft can say whatever it wants, but Bing almost never returns more relevant results than Google. At least in my experience. Even when you're searching through MSDN and other Microsoft-owned sites where you think Bing would have a significant advantage.

      Edge might be OK. From a technology standpoint it sounds pretty good (though that's mostly based on MS' own claims so salt required.) Problem is that they didn't bother with any sort of compatibility layer that I can tell, so it completely flips out on a large portion of websites. Occasionally it will even notice that its flipping out and suggest you retry with IE, but that brings up the question of why anyone would bother loading Edge if its just going to direct them to load IE half the time anyway -- may as well just start the one that works in the first place.

  14. And we just found one! by raymorris · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Yes, because electricity is free.

    An Arduino in a sleep, wake cycle like that will have average power usage of about 0.005 watts. That's $0.005 per year (one penny every two years).

    > There are a lot of dumb people here.

    And we just found one of them.

  15. It's about time... by dbreeze · · Score: 2

    ... Microsoft finally got nearer to a true price point for using their products.

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  16. Microsoft Refuses To See Why We Use Firefox by alternative_right · · Score: 2

    Apparently Microsoft execs are wondering why people are using Firefox, Chrome, Google and Linux instead of Edge, Bing and Windows.

    It is scapegoating and denial to say that the problem is popularity alone.

    The answer is that Microsoft products, while usually well-engineered under the hood, are awkward in interface and exhibit a corporate mentality of control in forcing us to use other Microsoft products.

    In what is clearly a shock to all the first-decade MBAs out there, people hate being forced to do things, and they hate schlocky time-wasting interfaces. Microsoft has made only part of the product, and that is why they are lagging.

    Why did people stop using IE, Edge's ancestor, which was once a market leader? Answer: security problems, a cruddy interface, and being forced into using other Microsoft schemes like Windows Live or whatever.

    Instead of looking at the actual reasons why their products are failing, Microsoft execs are dancing around the edges, looking for excuses for failure. This is a shame because it dooms to failure the quality work done by Microsoft engineers.

  17. Re:You mean a ... by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    That says a lot about the state of US reporting, A lot of US hard news articles are UK newspaper based, and not reported much, if at all in the US.

    http://www.pcworld.com/article...

    There you go US Based and more computer/tech oriented.

    Just a suspicion the Guardian was used because Pravda isn't what it used to be and the Russian State organs are now about Russian Nationalism not communism.