Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Wants To Pay You To Use Its Windows 10 Browser Edge (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report by The Guardian: Microsoft has a new browser. It launched with Windows 10 and it's called Edge. The company says it's faster, more battery efficient and all-round better than Chrome or Firefox. You can even draw on websites with a stylus. Trouble is, not very many people are using it. So now Microsoft's trying to bribe you to switch. The newly rebranded Microsoft Rewards -- formerly Bing Rewards, which paid people for using Bing as their search engine (another product Microsoft says is better than a Google product but that very few people actually use) -- will now pay you for using Edge, shopping at the Microsoft store, or using Bing. Users of Edge who sign up to Microsoft Rewards, which is currently US-only, are then awarded points simply for using the browser. Microsoft actively monitors whether you're using Edge for up to 30 hours a month. It tracks mouse movements and other signs that you're not trying to game the system, and you must also have Bing set as your default search engine. Points can then be traded in for vouchers or credit for places such as Starbucks, Skype, Amazon and ad-free Outlook.com -- remember, if you're not paying for something, you are the product.

149 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Worldwide news are always US only. by MindPrison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What else is new? Every banner for every campaign I've ever seen, every special offer, every 100s spam mail I get from anyone, MS or otherwise, is always "US" only when you read the fine print.

    Can we get a "US" news filter here so we can filter out the news that have offers only exlusive to US citizens? Please?

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Worldwide news are always US only. by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      How would that work? Does it require someone to read through the fine print of every offer presented in every story and manually tag whether or not that story contains US-only news? When The Guardian reports on a US-only story, it doesn't sound like that process can be reliably automated.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well that's your perspective, and it's not a terribly accurate one. The entire global technology infrastructure begins and ends with the United States. Oh but you think your Intel chip us made in Singapore because it says made in Singapore on it? Try again: The chip was fabricated in the US (specifically, Chandler Arizona) and was just packaged in Singapore. Intel, AMD, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, Facebook.... All US companies.

      Android and iOS make up 99% of the global smartphone market.

      But not just information technology... Name any health condition you can think of, and chances are the top hospital for that condition resides somewhere in the US. Cancer, pediatrics, cardiology, neurology...

      The same is true of other fields as well, such as aerospace.

      We're not somehow backwards just because don't use fucking metric. We don't use it mainly because we haven't felt a pressing need for it, much like some countries drive on the left side of the road, which itself comes from feudal times when you would always pass on the left so that you could unsheathe your weapon from your right hand and have it ready for combat in case you passed an adversary.

      Pigs and backwoods? Your thinking of somewhere else.

    3. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      We're not somehow backwards just because don't use fucking metric.

      Well, umm, actually we are. The only countries in the world that don't use the metric system are the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar.

      So yes, we're about as backwards as it gets in that respect.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Worldwide news are always US only. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It's a damn shame we don't have people who... what's the word?... "edit". Like, an editor.

      FWIW, you can be safely assured the stories here on /. are US-centric because it's a US-centric site. Thank you for playing.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      And that means what, exactly? Are you trying to say that North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela are somehow more technologically advanced because they measure their water using metric?

      Just because the US is the only one of a few who do a particular thing doesn't really say a whole lot, especially because there are many things like that beyond a measurement system that many countries hold unique.

    6. Re:Worldwide news are always US only. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What makes you think this is world wide? You're on a site hosted in the USA, run by a USA based company with USA based editors and a user base that primarily lives in the USA.

      Say it like it is. You're a guest of this site. So am I.

    7. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      Well, umm, actually we are. The only countries in the world that don't use the metric system are the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar.

      Damn near anything that you can purchase by weight or volume is listed in imperial and metric on the label. Just look at the labels. So it is in use.

      Canada still uses imperial units for many things. If you ask most Canadians how much they weight, they'll tell you in pounds. Speed limits in the UK are in MPH. Real estate in Hong Kong is measured by the sq. foot. Gas (petrol) is sold by the gallon in a dozen or so countries still. While the US, Myanmar and Liberia are the only three countries to not make metric the official system, the usage of imperial units is still very common in many countries.

    8. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to say that North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela are somehow more technologically advanced because they measure their water using metric?

      Nope, what I said was that we're about as backwards as it gets in terms of using the metric system.

      Since virtually all scientific research has moved to the metric system, perhaps we should jump waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead to the 1980's or so and do the same.

      The metric system has so many advantages that I really should have to detail them here.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    9. Re:Worldwide news are always US only. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Microsoft wants to squirt diarrhoea into your face? They'll pay to do so?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    10. Re:Worldwide news are always US only. by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Pfft this is Slashdot. Even the editors can't be bothered to RTFA.

    11. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

      The entire global technology infrastructure begins and ends with the United States. [...] Intel, AMD, Google, Apple, Microsoft, Cisco, Facebook.... All US companies.

      That looks like a reasonable list of most of the biggest US companies in computing today. You might have added a few more, notably Amazon, and perhaps the big PC manufacturers like Dell.

      However, for their size and resources, many of these companies have done remarkably little to advance technology infrastructure in the last few years. Almost all of them became big on the back of a small number of very successful products or services, but many of their more recent attempts to diversify have failed horribly. Today they mostly survive because they're so huge that they can afford to buy almost any other business that is actually innovative and potentially disruptive to their market dominance, and that's also how a lot of "their" innovation happens. Most of them are going to be in trouble if one or two geee that lay golden eggs die, and in several cases there are warning signs already.

      Meanwhile, you kind of forgot all the Asian giants and quite a few European companies that actually make most of those smartphones you mentioned, not to mention many of the household appliances we buy, huge amounts of telecomms infrastructure, huge amounts of transportation tech...

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    12. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Nope, what I said was that we're about as backwards as it gets in terms of using the metric system.

      And what's backwards about it?

      Since virtually all scientific research has moved to the metric system, perhaps we should jump waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay ahead to the 1980's or so and do the same.

      Tell me, when you pick up a bottle of tylenol, how are the doses measured? When you get blood lab work done, what measurements are used for all of the numbers written on the report? When you read an NIH whitepaper, how are all numbers they use measured?

      We've been on metric for a lot longer than you think in all of the areas that actually matter.

      The metric system has so many advantages that I really should have to detail them here.

      Hence it's used when it's needed. The only countries that don't exclusively use the metric system for every single thing that every person does are typically authoritarian governments. In the UK they still use the pint and the stone for every day shit. Unless you want to argue that authoritarianism is the only system that isn't backwards, I'm not sure what your message is. A while back one of those whitehouse petitions was for us to switch to metric; do you happen to recall what the response was?

      You may as well argue that we're also backwards for not switching to Esperanto as our national language.

    13. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      That looks like a reasonable list of most of the biggest US companies in computing today. You might have added a few more, notably Amazon, and perhaps the big PC manufacturers like Dell.

      Yeah and some other heavyweights I didn't mention include IBM and Nvidia. The point is, there are a ton of big ones in the US, and very few elsewhere. Europe actually comes in somewhere third in this regard, with perhaps ARM Holdings and maybe Philips being their most well known tech brands, with Asia being second, i.e. Samsung, LG, Asus, Lenovo, etc.

    14. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      you're confused, the USA does use the metric system where it makes sense. and "metric countries" like the UK use english measurements for many things, like railroads using miles, cars using miles and gallons and miles per gallon, people weighing themselves in "stones", beer by the pint, etc. etc.

    15. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Scientific research in the US is conducted in entirely metric, without exception. Medicine, the military, and most engineering firms in the US use metric.

      That street signs, recipes, and people's height/weight use customary units is a non-issue. Even many countries that claim to use metric still cling to customary units in trivial areas such as this. Getting all bent out of shape about it is silly.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    16. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      The metric system, not only makes much more sense than the imperial system, but is also the most widely used system of measurements.

      Even though both of these statements are true, they don't combine together to form some kind an unstoppable argument in favor of the metric system. Tell me, what is the advantage in having 120kph speed limits? "Oh, look I can go 120,000 meters per hour! See how easy that was to figure out?1?!?!??!" Or for weight, "Yup, I weigh 200 kilograms, and proud of it! Did you know that 200kg is the same as 200,000g? Amazing but true!"

      For science applications it's absolutely the best measurement system we've got. For mundane every day shit? There's no clear advantage over any other system, unless you just have a fetish for being able to convert arbitrary measurements into smaller ones for some reason.

      Maybe you can impress the ladies by expressing your dick size in metric, "Hey baby, wanna see my 17,000,000 nanometer cock?"

    17. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by armanox · · Score: 1

      Plenty of valid reasons for the average person to use US units over metric. Hell, the divisible-by-12 that the US units tend to follow is a lot better then base 10 when you think about it.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    18. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by wickedwitchofwest · · Score: 1

      Actually the only place in the UK that either pints or stones is the pub, where a pint or half pint is still served. Stones are not used we use kilos, like the rest of Europe.

    19. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      the divisible-by-12 that the US units tend to follow is a lot better then base 10 when you think about it.

      How so?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    20. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      ^US^MS Thing only runs on MS-OS. Not going to browse in a VM.

    21. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Fractional values are easier to come by with measurements divisible by 2, 3, 4, or 6 than with measurements that are only divisible by 2 or 5. Liquid measures are mostly divisible by various powers of 2: two tablespoons in an ounce, eight ounces in a cup, two cups in a pint, two pints in a quart, four quarts in a gallon. (Three teaspoons in a tablespoon is the exception.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    22. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Fractional values are easier to come by with measurements divisible by 2, 3, 4, or 6 than with measurements that are only divisible by 2 or 5. )

      Seems like dividing by 10 is easier, but that's just me.

      How many yards in a mile? Errr....lessee, 5280 divided by 3....hang on, let me get a calculator.

      How many meters in a kilometer? 1000.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    23. Re: Worldwide news are always US only. by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      We're not somehow backwards just because don't use fucking metric.

      Well, umm, actually we are. The only countries in the world that don't use the metric system are the United States, Liberia, and Myanmar.

      So yes, we're about as backwards as it gets in that respect.

      And France, Germany, and many other countries. Matter of fact, Airbus and many others. It's around more than people think.
      https://www.quora.com/Why-are-...

      There really is nothing special about metric, except it's the base 10. We now know that the whole basis of a meter was supposed to be 1 millionth of the distance between the North Pole and the equator is wrong. So it's clearly just a made up system, by the French. Imagine that, using a French standard. I've heard things like it's more accurate, and such. Nope, all the measuring systems are the same in accuracy. More data points, consider temperature, Farenheight has more.

      Personally I don't care. I have both sets of tools. I can go between them without much thought. Still kind of a pisser when I pick up a 10, 13 or 15 and it's not that. I have to get the standard socket (3/8, 7/16 and 1/2 are the usual suspects, then there is the 8mm and 1/4"). I suppose Metric is easier for people with an IQ below 100. I'd say even an idiot could do it, however I've met honest to goodness idiots. Their grasp on things is very light. Most of life gets by them. Sad really.

      Would be nice if we'd all just use the same thing. Don't care which, just pick one.

  2. Reeks of desperation by clubby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is what you do when you can't make a better product for your user base; you make a better product for those who prey upon you user base, bill the predators, and if not enough victims show up, you up the incentive.

    1. Re:Reeks of desperation by clubby · · Score: 1

      Search queries and results are mined already so why not use one that pays a little cash?

      Seriously? Shit's bad, so why not accept a pittance to make it worse? Also, cash and Amazon gift cards aren't quite the same thing.

    2. Re:Reeks of desperation by Sowelu · · Score: 2

      They're pretty darn close, if you use Amazon for cheap household necessities like a lot of people do.

    3. Re:Reeks of desperation by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Spend a few hundred thousand upfront for commercials and other advertising or spend that same money on what is effectively direct marketing with guaranteed capture rates? I think I'll go for option 2.

      Personally, I'll consider using Edge when it supports NoScript completely. Chrome still doesn't, so I don't use it.

    4. Re:Reeks of desperation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How dare they expand their rewards program!

    5. Re:Reeks of desperation by ranton · · Score: 2

      Also, cash and Amazon gift cards aren't quite the same thing.

      Physical cash is starting to have the same relationship to money as a picture of a 3.5" floppy disk has to saving data. It isn't completely phased out, but its really close for any affluent enough to have a credit card. For instance less than 3% of my spending is done with cash, and its only that high because my wife loves estate sales.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    6. Re:Reeks of desperation by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Edge doesn't even support third party plugins... Trouble viewing a PDF? Good luck discussing that with Microsoft. I don't know what they are thinking.

    7. Re:Reeks of desperation by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      I suspect that Edge's quality isn't the issue here. Microsoft could make Edge the best possible browser in the world, that leverages quantum computing to instantaneously give you web pages the second your mind just thinks about wanting to browser there, and it wouldn't matter.

      Microsoft has spent almost it's entire lifespan fucking over everyone and their goldfish in order to dominate and monopolize the PC market, and people are remembering that. On top of everything else, Windows 10 is demonstrating very clearly what Microsoft is willing to do when they think they can get away with it. In this case, they miscalculated very very badly, and manage to even piss off loyal members of their fanbase. I'm going to be ready with popcorn in hand to see what happens when 2020 rolls around and Windows 7 support finally ends.

      Note that every single product Microsoft has release, that doesn't have to do with their core Windows/Office base, has either failed miserably, or is in the process of failing miserably. Every. Single. One. Their only non-business oriented division (x-box) has had a brief run, but is also falling further and further behind.

      Zune failed so badly that not even Microsoft acknowledges it's existence anymore.

      I know that I wouldn't use Edge even if it could make me poop gold bullion, because I don't want Microsoft to repeat what they did with IE6. Of course, I can't use it anyway because I don't have Windows 10, and will do my damnedest to avoid it because of Microsoft's we-own-your-ass-now policies. But if Microsoft pulled their head out of their ass and ported Edge to Windows 7 and possibly other operating systems (Remember when IE4 ran on Solaris?), I still wouldn't use it.

    8. Re:Reeks of desperation by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      This isn't even payment. If people aren't using Edge there's a reason for it, and being forced to also use Bing just to get points that only give discounts is pitiful. A discount is not money unless you were already going to buy item anyway.

    9. Re:Reeks of desperation by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And people wonder why the local stores are going out of business. From people too lazy to get out of their mom's basement. If the reward is only for Amazon cards, or Starbucks cards, it is NOT because the reward has an equivalent cash value but because there's a kickback to drive people to those stores. To bad you can't send that $100 card to Amazon and get a $100 bill back in the mail.

      This is why when there's a class action judgement that the penalties are often paid out as coupons beause they're cheaper than cash.

    10. Re:Reeks of desperation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It takes a special combination of laziness and social anxiety to order toilet paper off of amazon because you'd rather wait 2 days for it to show up in the mail than drive five minutes to the store and buy it from a human being.

      (And surely there's some kind of site somewhere that'll let you sell that $100 amazon gift card for $98 cash to someone, right? That must be a thing...)

    11. Re:Reeks of desperation by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Edge has extensions now.

      It's still not a usable browser. Even Paul Thurrott can't endorse it yet. He talked recently about its many small frustrations, about how basic copy and paste features don't work, or how when you scale text up on a single page, ALL other tabs get scaled as well. Stupid, annoying stuff like that creates a terrible user experience.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    12. Re:Reeks of desperation by ranton · · Score: 1

      This is literally the "Everyone I know drives a Ford, therefore Buick is a failing company" argument. You're on /., you're balls deep in a techie bubble where no one's ever seen a dollar bill or used a phone for a voice call or bought a book anywhere *except* amazon.

      I did say my statement only applies to those affluent enough to have a credit card. Considering a third of Americans don't even have a credit card, and many purchases still must be done with a check / money order (such as rent / mortgage), its not surprising that half of transactions involve cash.

      But we are on Slashdot here, so saying Amazon gift cards are any different from cash here is just being pedantic.

      I will concede there are plenty of tinfoil hat conspiracy nuts who care if all of our transactions are tracked, but most people with the means to use digital currency vote with their actions (which show they don't care about the privacy implications).

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    13. Re:Reeks of desperation by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      It isn't completely phased out, but its really close for any affluent enough to have a credit card. For instance less than 3% of my spending is done with cash, and its only that high because my wife loves estate sales.

      It's really close for you, but a single point of anecdotal data is meaningless. Let me counter with my own anecdote: I'm reasonably affluent and have credit cards, but I pay in cash for about 80% of my transactions.

      But the observation that a gift card is not the same as cash has nothing to do with this. Being given a credit at a particular store is not the same as being given cash, regardless of whether or not that "cash" is in the form of physical currency.

      The point is more around "can you spend it in any way you like"? If you're limited to a particular retailer or retailers (even if it's "all of them" -- what if I want to give it to an individual?), then the answer is "no".

    14. Re:Reeks of desperation by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I did say my statement only applies to those affluent enough to have a credit card. Considering a third of Americans don't even have a credit card, and many purchases still must be done with a check / money order (such as rent / mortgage), its not surprising that half of transactions involve cash.

      Most people, even those without credit cards, have debit cards that can be used to buy stuff and pay rent just the same as credit cards. According to the FDIC, around 10% of the US population does not have access to debit card services. Indeed, there are a lot more people paying with debit cards than credit cards -- in supermarket purchasing, it's about 2 to 1. The only segment where credit cards are used more than debit cards is with online purchasing.

  3. Bing It by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use Bing because I find it to be as good as Google or better for searches (especially image/video searches) and maps.
    The fact that they pay me to use it is a bonus.

    They'd have to pay me a LOT more to use Edge, however. And make Edge available for Windows 7, because fuck Windows 10.

    1. Re:Bing It by halivar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bing is actually better that Google in returned results. But I do absolutely hate the interface with a fiery passion.

    2. Re:Bing It by LichtSpektren · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why don't you use duckduckgo or some other search engine that doesn't violate your privacy by tracking you?

    3. Re:Bing It by the_skywise · · Score: 2

      What?!

      I wouldn't fuck Windows 10 if they gave it away for FREE!!!

      Oh wait...

    4. Re:Bing It by internerdj · · Score: 2

      I've been doing my daily number of required searches for the Bing rewards program for a while. I can usually get fairly helpful answers for everyday things, but when I start diving deep into technical problems it is beyond useless. As for me being the product, what major search engine can I use that isn't mining my searches for profit?

    5. Re:Bing It by LichtSpektren · · Score: 2

      As for me being the product, what major search engine can I use that isn't mining my searches for profit?

      See: https://www.privacytools.io/#s...

      If you're too lazy to click, it says DuckDuckGo, Disconnect Search, MetaGer and ixquick.

    6. Re:Bing It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bing is better than Google in porn searching, especially videos, just turn safe search off.

    7. Re:Bing It by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      DuckDuckGo kind of sucks as a search engine, though. The results even on the first page are not always relevant.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    8. Re:Bing It by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sucks for porn.

      Not if you understand the wonderful DDG bang commands.

      !bi my fetish

      Search Bing images, the best porn image search, without having to go to Bing's eye-damaging front page. There are many cool ! commands, including !wa to search Wolfram Alpha, the world's best online calculator.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Bing It by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Informative

      I use Bing because I find it to be as good as Google or better for searches (especially image/video searches) and maps.

      This is demonstrably false. As soon as you look for something even remotely rare where Google finds only 5-10 matches, Bing finds 0. I've done this experiment innumerable times.

      Some examples:

      Search for "tig welding" "cantilever" "bronze"
      Google: 491000 results
      Bing: 3150 results

      Search for "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat"
      Google: 1150 results
      Bing: 58 results (none of which very relevant)

      search for "ion scavenger" "fluorescein"
      Google: 192 results
      Bing: 23 results

      Search for "osmosis" "peristalsis" "cowboy bebop"
      Google: 34 results
      Bing: 1 result!

      Finally... search for "forked code" "bonded" "lap"
      Google: 4 results
      Bing: fuckall

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    10. Re:Bing It by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Bing maps seems to lack a lot of the detail that Google has. Stuff like individual business names in every building, with opening times, contact details etc. It probably depends on the area you are looking at but for Japan Google Maps are way, way better.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Bing It by Nunya666 · · Score: 2

      DuckDuckGo kind of sucks as a search engine, though. The results even on the first page are not always relevant.

      So pick your poison: MS crap, Google's track-everything-you-do, or DDG that works 90% of the time (for me, at least).

      I choose DDG. When the search results don't answer my question, then I run the same search in Google.

    12. Re:Bing It by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      It's nice that you think they don't track you.

      There's no trackers on their website, and the ads are generalized by your current search query, not your past searches. I see no evidence they're tracking anybody. Maybe they sell their visitor logs to some other company, but if anybody caught them in the act, they'd be destroyed instantly (since [1] privacy is the singular thing their business hinges on, and [2] it would be such a massive violation of their explicitly clear, non-jargony Terms of Service that they'd be sued into oblivion).

    13. Re:Bing It by clubby · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I do. About one search in 20, I nope it on over to Google. Just stick a !g in front of your query, and off you go.

    14. Re:Bing It by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Google returns a few billion results for pretty much every search these days. That's the problem, it doesn't know when to say "There's literally nothing about this on the Internet". Google's programmers don't actually seem to understand that that is a useful answer.

      That said, I haven't tried your search strings above, and for all I know every single page Google is returning is either relevant or actually contains the search term.

      That would be a first though.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    15. Re: Bing It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The best image search? The world's best online calculator? You appear to be channeling Donald Trump, Ken Rockwell, or both.

    16. Re:Bing It by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I have given DDG several tries - it is a total waste of space. But, so is Bing IME.

      Not that I love Google - five years ago, it was great. now its beginning to fester.

      Please, someone, can we have a search engine that looks for what I typed in the Search bar, and nothing else. Always. And respects "-" when I want to exclude irrelevant crap.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    17. Re:Bing It by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Who needs search when you have xhamster?

      I wonder if they have any connection to the old newgroup alt.sex.hamster.duct.tape...

    18. Re:Bing It by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Bearing in mind that if you're using Windows 10, it won't be you doing the fucking...

    19. Re:Bing It by ilsaloving · · Score: 4, Funny

      "tig welding" "cantilever" "bronze"
      "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat"
      "ion scavenger" "fluorescein"
      "osmosis" "peristalsis" "cowboy bebop"
      "forked code" "bonded" "lap"

      You either have the worlds most amazing Saturday nights, or the most terrifying.

    20. Re: Bing It by lgw · · Score: 1

      The best image search? The world's best online calculator?

      Everyone knows that Bing is for porn. And, yes, Wolfram Alpha is ridiculously good - it's from the same guys who make Mathematica, and it sits on a substantial raw data set for something general purpose (such as "all current and historical weather data"). It's not the all-purpose factual search engine it wants to be, but as a calculator on steroids it's quite nice.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:Bing It by stephenmac7 · · Score: 1

      Not anymore. Both search engines have now indexed your post.

      --
      "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." -- Judge Gideon J. Tucker
    22. Re:Bing It by CrashNBrn · · Score: 2
      Except Google is lying to you. There actually aren't 1150 results for "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat"
      Click on page 15 of the results

      Your search - "botox" "cannabis" "dingbat" - did not match any documents.

      Suggestions:

      * Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
      * Try different keywords.
      * Try more general keywords.
      * Try fewer keywords.

      Search Results

      In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 129 already displayed.

    23. Re:Bing It by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      On top of Bing being more honest about how many actual results there are. You can still use FOO +BAR +BAZ instead of "FOO" "BAR" "BAZ".

    24. Re:Bing It by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Don't jump to gGoogle. There are a lot of engines that wrap Google searches (like startpage)./p.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    25. Re:Bing It by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, Windows Fucks *YOU*!

    26. Re:Bing It by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Bing is actually better that Google in returned results. But I do absolutely hate the interface with a fiery passion.

      We agree about the interface, but my experience with Bing's returned results is different from yours. I found Bing lacking enough that I gave up on it entirely.

    27. Re:Bing It by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I feel the same way about DDG. I really, really want it to be good enough to meet my needs, but it just doesn't. I suspect some of that is because it relies heavily (but not solely) on Bing.

    28. Re:Bing It by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I've found the opposite. Now whenever I use Google I'm amazed at just how bad the results often are. That's actually the big reason I stopped using Google in the first place. Now some of it is not really Google's fault (people doing SEO mostly only try to game Google's results) but a lot of it is Google's fault (Google searching for what it thinks I want to search for, not what I actually searched for). This is the most obvious when DuckDuckGo doesn't return many results for a search, so I try Google which returns a huge pile of results which turn out to have nothing really to do with what I actually searched for.

      As far as Bing is concerned, I've not found it to be a whole lot better than Google, but certainly no worse. Some of the features (maps, image search) are considerably better and more useful than Google's.

    29. Re:Bing It by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That doesn't prove much of anything. Google always seems to return a huge pile of "results" for any search. Most are completely useless and have nothing to do with what I was searching for. And somewhere buried in that huge pile of useless crap I'll find the same few, at least somewhat relevant pages that Bing (or DuckDuckGo) would have turned up. I'm not sure what your searches are actually about, but I bet you'll find a most of of the Google results don't contain all three of those terms, with many only containing one of the terms, and even pages that have none of those terms(!).

    30. Re:Bing It by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Due to the Slashdot effect, Google will find that 'peristalsis' is inexplicably trending upward.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  4. Still nope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A browser that is buggy as hell, has no plug-in support, and just plain doesn't work right. No thanks!

    1. Re:Still nope! by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that the "Microsoft actively monitors whether you're using Edge for up to 30 hours a month. It tracks mouse movements and other signs that you're not trying to game the system, and you must also have Bing set as your default search engine." statement means that Microsoft will be setting up a telemetry service on your computer to record what you do and send it to Microsoft. Just like the "Customer Experience Improvement Program" updates that add telemetry trackers to your Win7 system which Microsoft keeps trying to push to people even after the Windows 10 free update period has expired.

    2. Re:Still nope! by Bugler412 · · Score: 2

      so just like Chrome then?

    3. Re:Still nope! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Edge is a couple years behind Chrome, Safari and Firefox in standards support. Why should I use edge on my powerful desktop where pages actually render better and sometimes faster on my phone! Microsoft Energy per page load metric is kinda useless being that Windows is mostly installed on a rather powerful PC, where such battery life metrics isn't that big of a deal.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  5. Ehh maybe halfway? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 2

    They've put a lot of work into Edge. Now that it supports extensions and has Adblock, it may even be good enough to use regularly. It sounds unlikely but it's not without possibility that it is better than Chrome in perf.

    But Bing? They're nuts. The search results are measurably worse and the user experience is lacking advanced features that makes Google so powerful.

    1. Re:Ehh maybe halfway? by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Now that it supports extensions and has Adblock

      Sweet! So it's on par with what other browsers have had with years or in the case of Firefox, over a decade.

    2. Re:Ehh maybe halfway? by aisaac · · Score: 1

      I tried it. Rendering was fine and reasonably speedy. (They disagree with FF and Chrome on whether the first EOL after a `pre` tag must be rendered in an XHTML document, and they are probably on the wrong side of that.) But then I tried to download a file to my preferred location: no choice, and no way to set a preference to ask for a save location. 'Bye to Edge.

  6. Remember AllAdvantage? by thebes · · Score: 1

    Anyone else remember AllAdvantage?

  7. Re:Bah Humbug! by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fuck Micro$oft!!!

    I will not. Have you seen how many viruses they have?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  8. Trust busting by LichtSpektren · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Setting aside the privacy implications of this (at this point, anyone who thinks they aren't being bagged n' tagged when using Windows 10 is either woefully naive or incredibly stupid), I think this warrants another antitrust investigation into Microsoft's behavior.

    Microsoft's OS will silently and without permission uninstall programs that compete with the ones shipped with Windows 10, such as Firefox and Chrome. Or sometimes it will just silently and without permission change your default web browser back to Edge. The reason for this is because Edge's default search engine is Bing, which gives money to Microsoft via personalized advertisement brokering. And now they're locking in Edge, Bing, and the Windows Store so the user is given some menial rewards for using the three lock-in-step.

    When a company uses its monopoly or near-monopoly on one platform (e.g. desktop OS) in order to break into other platforms (e.g. web browsers, search engines, app stores), and rewards users for obeying or inconveniences/punishes users for not obeying, that's called abuse. It is far worse than AT&T bundling free phones with their service, and that got them split up into multiple companies. And it's several steps advanced from the original case that Microsoft was convicted for, which was bundling Internet Explorer with Windows 95.

    1. Re:Trust busting by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      And it's several steps advanced from the original case that Microsoft was convicted for, which was bundling Internet Explorer with Windows 95.

      But that was way before there were dozens of billions being made with such systems. Look at google, they have featured invasive ads for their chrome browser on the most popluar website on the internet. Any punishment? None. Or take google apps. Abusing their monopoly is the only control they have in fact over android, the remainder is open sourced. On the smartphone maket, google approaches monopoly status.

      Or take systemd. It bundles many services and is forced down the throats of thousands of gnu/linux users. Thanks to it, everyone is forced to use binary logging if they want to use udev.

    2. Re:Trust busting by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      But that was way before there were dozens of billions being made with such systems. Look at google, they have featured invasive ads for their chrome browser on the most popluar website on the internet. Any punishment? None. Or take google apps. Abusing their monopoly is the only control they have in fact over android, the remainder is open sourced. On the smartphone maket, google approaches monopoly status.

      You can change the default browser in Chrome or install another browser. Besides, Android isn't a monopoly, since iOS is a viable alternative. On the other hand, many governments and what not still require legacy x86 Windows-exclusive standards, so even though Linux and macOS and ChromeOS exist, Windows is still de facto a monopoly.

      Or take systemd. It bundles many services and is forced down the throats of thousands of gnu/linux users. Thanks to it, everyone is forced to use binary logging if they want to use udev.

      Use eudev. Problem solved. Or, forward all your logs from journald to your preferred syslog daemon so they're in plaintext. Also you're not really forced to do anything since Linux is free as in speech and beer, but have fun with your victim complex.

    3. Re:Trust busting by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      It is far worse than AT&T bundling free phones with their service, and that got them split up into multiple companies.

      If by AT&T you mean Ma Bell, then free phones? When did that ever happen? Under Ma Bell you leased your phone equipment from the phone company. Ma Bell got split up into multiple companies because it was a massive monopoly that maintained this and other predatory pricing practices.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:Trust busting by LichtSpektren · · Score: 1

      Most subscribers to AT&T in the 1980s got Western Electric equipment bundled with their telephone subscription. Western Electric of course was owned by AT&T, making them a vertical monopoly.

  9. MONITORS FOR 30 HOURS A MONTH-- WHO KNEW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    everybody. fuck your shit spies.

  10. So.. like.. by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    With Apple and Google getting into cars Microsoft can't be far behind so will this happen with their cars soon?

    Here, here's our car for FREE and while you drive it we'll give you mileage rewards. Just make sure you use BING navigation and BING auto-insurance which will track your driving and mileage habits!

    Heck, why not start that with Windows Phones first...

    Or they could, y'know.. just make a better web browser?

    1. Re:So.. like.. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Or they could, y'know.. just make a better web browser?

      Could they though? I'm beginning to think they lack the capacity.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:So.. like.. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Microsoft have a partnership with Ford for vehicle automation already.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:So.. like.. by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      So Ford is the new Nokia?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  11. Here's an idea for Microsoft by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    How about taking the money that Microsoft is going to "pay" to users and:
    - Go through Windows 7 (or previous versions, personally I'm using Win 7 for my MS only software development) and fix outstanding bugs
    - Create an open source, WebKit based browser that can compete with Chrome/Firefox/whatever without having to pay for users

    In the long run, this would be money better spent (ie generate more paying customers) than bribing users to use the substandard products that Microsoft has on it's "Front Line".

    1. Re:Here's an idea for Microsoft by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Or, just like they are open-sourcing PowerShell, they can open-source Windows 7, and wash their hands of the need to maintain that completely. And continue to use & promote Windows 10 w/ all their vendors & partners. As it is, there is ReactOS being developed, but that can be done even faster once they know what code they can't resemble

    2. Re:Here's an idea for Microsoft by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      How about taking the money that Microsoft is going to "pay" to users and: ...

      That won't get them all the data that they'll be able to collect from the people who "agree" to installing the telemetry processes that will let Microsoft track what you're doing on your computer.

    3. Re:Here's an idea for Microsoft by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      But if they did that, then why would anyone use Windows 10??

  12. Browser Turing Test . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It tracks mouse movements and other signs that you're not trying to game the system

    This sounds like a challenge to me. Can you write a bot that can fool the Edge bot detection system . . . ?

    Search on a tech topic. Open the StackOverflow result. Take some time, and follow some of the links to death.

    In another tab, search for porn, and follow the links.

    Hey presto! Normal user browser behavior!

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  13. Reason I don't use Bing... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...Bing as their search engine (another product Microsoft says is better than a Google product but that very few people actually use...

    The Bing spider did not follow the instructions (about which subdirectories to skip) I gave it in the robots.txt file on my website.

    .
    I sent logs and my robots.txt to Bing's support team, and got back an answer along the lines of, ~yeah, we know that sometimes it doesn't follow robots.txt, that's your problem to solve~.

    If Microsoft thinks their search spider is so "special" that it need not follow the instructions I give it for my websites, then I don't want anything to do with Bing.

    1. Re:Reason I don't use Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      it sounds like you think microsoft are a bunch of selfish pricks who don't give fig for standards of behaviour, standards for technology or standards in general. I'm shocked.

    2. Re:Reason I don't use Bing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      BingBot was hitting my site for invalid urls - changing case. And I was getting hit thousands of times a day. It wasn't like they were hitting old urls - they literally changed the case on the URL and my server was properly returning a 404. This went on for weeks until I opened a support ticket and then it finally stopped some weeks after that. What a shit bot.

    3. Re:Reason I don't use Bing... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...where is it the law that I have to check for a robots.txt file?

      There isn't a law.

      .
      Bing support admitted to me that their spider had a bug and they were not going to fix it.

      There's nothing I can do to make Microsoft be good netizens, that ball is entirely in their court. Bing support made it obvious to me that they don't care.

    4. Re:Reason I don't use Bing... by clonehappy · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck. While I agree with your sentiment, absolutely, 100%, I had no idea anyone (maybe besides myself) still had the concept in their mind that ANYBODY on the internet was still interested in being a "good netizen" in 2016.

  14. Re:"All around better" by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

    Nothing like facts to drive your point home...

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  15. Not a differentiator: by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

    You can even draw on websites with a stylus.

    This is just plain lame. If it's a killer feature, then what is stopping other browser manufacturers from duplicating it? If it's not a killer feature, then other browser makers will ignore it and it will die!

    How is this feature even useful by the way, it's not a web standard, so it's not as if someone else can see what you are drawing on the web page... unless you cast it to raster, in which case, I can already do this with ms paint and a screen grab... I'm just not seeing how anybody is clamoring for this feature.

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  16. christ its like a fever dream by nimbius · · Score: 1

    MS manager: xbox is turning into scorpio, and everything is windows 10
    Manager 2: hololens is now unaccountably integrated into windows 10. virtual reality email.
    manager 3: powershell is now for linux
    manager 4:: people will now need to pay money to surf the internet using our browser.
    manager 5: windows 10 now runs on the raspberry pi
    janitor: guys how does all this make money....

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  17. Another use for my Arduino by raymorris · · Score: 3, Funny

    Once I had a system where the power management (sleep) couldn't be turned off, and we wanted to use it for digital signage. So in about eight lines of code I turned an Arduino into a USB mouse and set it to wiggle the cursor every 5 minutes, thereby preventing the system from going to sleep.

    Later, I wanted to wanted to guess someone's PIN number over night, so with a few lines of code I set the Arduino to act as a USB keyboard and type in every possible PIN, waiting a few seconds between tries.

    Now, Microsoft is willing to pay me to wiggle a mouse around and occasionally click. Hmm ... :)

    1. Re: Another use for my Arduino by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      Electricity is free at work!

    2. Re:Another use for my Arduino by WarlockD · · Score: 1

      Now, Microsoft is willing to pay me to wiggle a mouse around and occasionally click. Hmm ... :)

      I remember, back in college maybe 1998, my roomate signed up for this startup company that would pay him per click on advertisments. He wrote a script that would reload the website, move the mouse, and click on the link evey 2 seconds.

      He made close to 300 bucks over 3 months before the company went belly up. I wish I got in the action but I was taking ethics:P

    3. Re:Another use for my Arduino by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      Sounds like All Advantage. My roommate and I used several pay to browse adbars services for beer money around that time too. For broke college students it was a decent way to make a few extra bucks. Unfortunately most services didn't last very long.

  18. BUaaS by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    Browser User as a Service vendor here: My pricing structure starts at $10,000 per month.

    HMU.

    --
    Who did what now?
  19. Even paid by danbob999 · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole

    1. Re:Even paid by jimbob6 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if it were a 9 foot pole that just says 10 on it?

    2. Re:Even paid by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      What if it were a Microsoft 9 foot pole that just says 10 on it?

      FTFY

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  20. Re:Bah Humbug! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow, real insightful and snarky, ya know, substituting the S with a $. I somehow think people were doing that before you were born.

  21. Bing sucks by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    Wife got a new laptop, win10. Tried figuring how to do something in Win10 (was different than earlier versions). Couldn't. Did a search. Default was BING. No luck. Entered same search terms into Google, and as well as serving up relevant looking links, it gave me the answer outright. Google knows more about Win10 than BING does. WTF?!?

    And Edge crashes her laptop a lot.

  22. Hmmm Cash Opp by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    back in the day we botted sites to keep clicking on the ad.

    Seems like now is a good time to script up a Macro using edge to search bing for every word in a dictionary...The laptop I was using to see the preview builds of win 10 will do nicely.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  23. What is old is new by thunderclees · · Score: 1

    M$ was paying users to use Edge before using a token economy. The proble mwith Edge is that M$ gives you nowhere in recent version to have it automatically dump the the cache and clear history. If I wanted to sell my browsing privacy to some faceless monopoly I'd run Chrome.

  24. Re:You mean a ... by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    It says a lot about the state of US news consumers if you think an advertisement for a brand loyalty program is "hard news."

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  25. I stand impressed ... by stevez67 · · Score: 1

    ... by the sheer volume of people who think that anything they do on the internet, regardless the "precautions" they take to try to maintain their anonymity, is really anonymous. Or that Microsoft is more evil than ANY other tech company. But if self-delusion lets you sleep better at night, so be it.

  26. I'm noticing a trend... by Immerman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows 10: free*
    Edge: we'll pay *you*

    Could it be that the price of Microsoft products are finally approaching their actual value?

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    1. Re:I'm noticing a trend... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Step 3 is, "We'll pay you in bitcoins so you can buy heroin on the dark net."

      Step 4 is, "We'll send you heroin by drone."

      Step 5 is, "Windows 11 is $5000/month and comes with free heroin."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:I'm noticing a trend... by Altrag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on what you define as their "products."

      Windows 10 is only "free" if you had a (recent) prior version of Windows. Sure there will be a few lost sales but the vast majority of people don't "upgrade" their OS until their PC breaks and the new version comes with their new PC.

      And in turn they reduce their support costs significantly (they can justify EOLing Win7/8 much sooner if you've been given every incentive to upgrade already.) And of course they can leverage any new "features" in Win10 as an ad platform to generate third party compensation. They probably didn't expect quite as much backlash against Win10s intrusiveness but even with that, I'm guessing they're not hurting too much from the giveaway.

      As for Bing and Edge. That's a much more direct and obvious bribe attempt. Microsoft can say whatever it wants, but Bing almost never returns more relevant results than Google. At least in my experience. Even when you're searching through MSDN and other Microsoft-owned sites where you think Bing would have a significant advantage.

      Edge might be OK. From a technology standpoint it sounds pretty good (though that's mostly based on MS' own claims so salt required.) Problem is that they didn't bother with any sort of compatibility layer that I can tell, so it completely flips out on a large portion of websites. Occasionally it will even notice that its flipping out and suggest you retry with IE, but that brings up the question of why anyone would bother loading Edge if its just going to direct them to load IE half the time anyway -- may as well just start the one that works in the first place.

  27. LOL, "no" by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft Wants To Pay You To Use Its Windows 10 Browser Edge"

    Lol, no, not even if they paid me.

    Look, I'll admit that I've done a LOT of shameful things for money, but even I have limits, low as they are.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  28. Cool by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    Can I script it and run it in a VM?

  29. Ahead of the curve? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    So is this how the economy will work when robots take all the jobs? Because otherwise I don't see how this makes sense.

  30. And we just found one! by raymorris · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Yes, because electricity is free.

    An Arduino in a sleep, wake cycle like that will have average power usage of about 0.005 watts. That's $0.005 per year (one penny every two years).

    > There are a lot of dumb people here.

    And we just found one of them.

  31. Re:You are Microsoft's product, not customer. by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    Free windows 10 you are the product, The non free version of win 10 is the very same OS nothing is diffrent except you now have to pay for it and you still are the product. Isn't that unfair?i think it is.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  32. Business plan by istartedi · · Score: 1

    1. Sign up for this program.
    2. Sue them for violating labor laws.
    3. ???, IANAL and it probably won't work
    4. Profit!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  33. dnf install edge by short · · Score: 1

    I see no Edge in Fedora and neither Debian. How is the package called?

  34. Adblock. by Fragnet · · Score: 1

    Edge has no Adblock as of yet, so a lot of websites are almost unusable. Bing is fucking terrible compared to Google, so that's a no-go. Rewards? Kiss my ring.

  35. Windows is a dealbreaker by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    No, I can't really see it. I also value my privacy so I don't think their offer will work for me. I've got friends doing this and they only get an store credit card for $5 every 3 months, not really worth it IMHO!

  36. Uhm... no by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    Fuck off cunts. :D

  37. It's about time... by dbreeze · · Score: 2

    ... Microsoft finally got nearer to a true price point for using their products.

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  38. What is this .... by DeafAnchovy · · Score: 1

    ... Microsoft you speak of?

    --
    "We must never stop at all until we see the day when nuclear arms have been banished from the face of this earth." -- Ro
  39. Bribes by outlaw69 · · Score: 1

    If you have to pay someone to use your browser, your browser may just SUCK. No thanks macrosuck, I'll stick with chrome.

    --
    It's better to be hated for who you are, than be loved for who you're not.
  40. Re:You mean a ... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Yes, but it's true. US news is mostly a bunch of BS about the Kardashians and the like.

  41. Re: Make in Phillipines Packaged in... by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    Chandler is the home of the most advanced fab in the world. And yes, Intel still assembles parts in Singapore, among other places, I just listed them as an example.

    In fact even some of the cheap crap electronics you buy from China are made from parts here. I live within miles of an Avnet plant where they make things like resistors, capacitors, diodes, etc, that are shipped straight to China for assembly into PCBs that later make their way back here inside of a smartphone or a refrigerator.

  42. Microsoft Refuses To See Why We Use Firefox by alternative_right · · Score: 2

    Apparently Microsoft execs are wondering why people are using Firefox, Chrome, Google and Linux instead of Edge, Bing and Windows.

    It is scapegoating and denial to say that the problem is popularity alone.

    The answer is that Microsoft products, while usually well-engineered under the hood, are awkward in interface and exhibit a corporate mentality of control in forcing us to use other Microsoft products.

    In what is clearly a shock to all the first-decade MBAs out there, people hate being forced to do things, and they hate schlocky time-wasting interfaces. Microsoft has made only part of the product, and that is why they are lagging.

    Why did people stop using IE, Edge's ancestor, which was once a market leader? Answer: security problems, a cruddy interface, and being forced into using other Microsoft schemes like Windows Live or whatever.

    Instead of looking at the actual reasons why their products are failing, Microsoft execs are dancing around the edges, looking for excuses for failure. This is a shame because it dooms to failure the quality work done by Microsoft engineers.

  43. Re:You mean a ... by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

    That says a lot about the state of US reporting, A lot of US hard news articles are UK newspaper based, and not reported much, if at all in the US.

    http://www.pcworld.com/article...

    There you go US Based and more computer/tech oriented.

    Just a suspicion the Guardian was used because Pravda isn't what it used to be and the Russian State organs are now about Russian Nationalism not communism.

  44. Screw that by neminem · · Score: 1

    I would actually be tempted - Firefox has gotten increasingly sucktastic, and Chrome has some glaring deficiencies as well, so if I had already been forced onto Windows 10, I'd certainly have tried out Edge, and if it wasn't actively noticeably *worse* than FF or Chrome these days, I'd happily use it if they were paying me. Hard to pass up free money.

    But must use Bing as your default search engine? Frack that. (Moot point anyway for the moment, I'm staying with Windows 7 for as long as I possibly can. Eventually, though, my machine will die, and I'll be forced onto 10. So at that point...)

  45. Garbage by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    It's horrible, has a ton of bugs and doesn't properly support JavaScript or CSS, we had to end up blocking it on my companies website just to be safe.

  46. Lesson Learned by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Even IF I were going to potentially try Edge, there was a lesson I learned as a child, and it has held to this day as zero fail: When something seems too good to be true.....

    Well, you know the rest. The suckers that actually think that MS isn't getting that $ worth PLUS MORE at the expense of said suckers are very unfortunately under-educated. Even more unfortunate is the number of people that will jump right on it and keep this sort of BS alive.

  47. They can keep by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Microsoft can keep their money. As a general rule I block Bing at the firewall level.

  48. Not the bleeding edge... by meerling · · Score: 1

    When edge first came out, I tried it, and it worked pretty good, but it didn't have the extensions and other things for blocking ads and that kind of stuff I've grown to love. So I went back to my usual browser.
    Some stuff happened, and I had to use edge for a few things. They've done updates to it since I'd used it before, and now the thing is so freaking SLOW!
    Microsoft also made it the default with one of the updates without telling me it would or had changed it. :(
    So I'd click on something in a program, and it would launch the browser, and suddenly edge would start to come up...
    I said "start to come up" because after about half a minute, I'd get tired of waiting for that piece of #### to load and would fire up chrome. Chrome would start up, and have the page fully loaded before edge that had at least half a minutes head start had anything. Often I was done reading the page and had already closed chrome before edge would finally get anything.
    It went from ok but not what I want to absolute and utter trash in less than a year.
    If microsoft wants anyone to actually use that ####, they're going to be paying through the nose!

  49. Having used MS Edge by Trogre · · Score: 1

    You couldn't pay me enough to make it my main browser.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  50. No Chromecast or other extensions by fastAlan · · Score: 1

    Why would we use it if it doesn't even have basic extensions like chromecast? I found an MS answer saying to use chrome! http://answers.microsoft.com/e...

  51. Too bad Edge doesn't support javascript by naranek · · Score: 1

    According to MS support page Edge doesn't support javascript. That's a bit of a downer ;)

    "While Windows 10 does support JavaScript, the Microsoft Edge web browser does not. You cannot activate or enable the Java plug-in on the Edge browser. However, Windows 10 also includes Internet Explorer 11. If you encounter JavaScript content in Edge"

    https://support.office.com/en-...

    --
    Only dumb birds land downwind.
  52. Re:Fuck me by freeze128 · · Score: 1
    No, you don't get it. You will actually be using the internet MORE. Here's how:
    1. 1. You configure BING as your default search engine.
    2. 2. You browse as you normally do. When you want to search for something, it brings up results from BING.
    3. 3. After seeing this, you manually type in the address bar "google.com" and search for what you were looking for from a GOOD search engine.
  53. Failing by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    A company wanting to "pay you" to use their product is a company that is admitting their product is failing.

  54. Still in development... by macruzq · · Score: 1

    This sounds like paying Beta testers to do the job... is it still Beta?

  55. Fighting old success by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    I've seen it a bunch of times. People still want to use the old stuff. I use edge, and unfortunately IE. Certain sites I use have to not only use IE, it has to be a certain version or the Microsoft back end won't work. Standard Microsoft crap. So fragile.

  56. Re:You mean a ... by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Is The Guardian serving up the Microsoft ads to everybody, or just to US users? There will always be a few cases they will get wrong, such as non-US users of corporate networks of US-based companies, but they should be able to get it right at least 95% of the time.