Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Suddenly Stops Selling Student Loans (bloomberg.com)

"The promotion has ended," a bank spokesperson said. After more than a year of preparation, Amazon's partnership with Wells Fargo to sell student loans barely lasted six weeks. An anonymous reader quotes Bloomberg: It's another black eye for Wells Fargo's student loan business, which just last week agreed to pay $3.6 million to the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to settle claims that it misled borrowers, illegally charged certain fees, and processed payments in a way designed to maximize late fees. Wells Fargo neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing.
The article cites a consumer advocate who says both Amazon and Wells Fargo were hiding the high costs of the loans, as well as their inflexible terms for repayment, in a "cynical attempt to dupe current students." The Washington Post noted that interest rates for community colleges and for-profit institutions "can climb to nearly 14%."

81 comments

  1. News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stuff that matters.....

    1. Re: News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, this is selling student loans ON THE INTERNET! Of course this matters.

  2. Editor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "The article sites a consumer advocate who both Amazon and Wells Fargo were hiding the high costs of the loans"

    What? Presumably the article actually "Cites" this consumer advocate who "claims" both... perhaps?

    Does any editing actually occur here?

    1. Re:Editor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to slashdot.

    2. Re: Editor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot? What? I thought this was a looney bin, *looks around*. Yea I'm right, this is a fucking looney bin.

    3. Re:Editor? by Hylandr · · Score: 0

      Editing died sometime in 2012 to free up time for fabricating mis-information.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    4. Re:Editor? by watermark · · Score: 1

      Sadly, such scanty scribbles signifies sufficient substance on Slashdot

    5. Re:Editor? by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Sadly, such scanty scribbles signifies sufficient Slashdot substance.

      Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy...

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    6. Re:Editor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, such scanty scribbles signifies sufficient Slashdot substance.

      Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy...

      Sloppy... you made a funny. Huhhheheh huhuheheheheh!

    7. Re: Editor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the strangest MUD I've ever played!

  3. Or maybe they know something we don't ... by bwanagary · · Score: 1

    One of the presidential candidates has promised they would fix the student loan crisis upon becoming president. If Amazon has some precognition that this candidate will likely become the next president (and I believe they do) and the president-elect does what they promised (and I believe that they will), or that there's an onerous interest hike and regulation in the works (more likely than not) then there's no big money left in student loans and they pulled out.

    1. Re:Or maybe they know something we don't ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...the president-elect does what they promised (and I believe that they will)...

      Congress would have to pass a law. The POTUS couldn't do anything on their own. The ONLY power the POTUS has on issues like this is veto power. And they have hardly any control over the economy. I don't why folks believe the candidates when they say they can fix it.. They can't. (FDR getting us out of the Depression is a myth. Regan giving the boom in the late 80s is a myth. Clinton giving us the great economy of the 90s is a myth. BUT their respective political parties LOVE the credit.)

      President's don't have as much power as the candidates lead people to believe and the fact that the electorate believes they do shows that what we need in school again is Civics - NOT programming. What good is it if everyone can program when they are lead around their noses by candidates that talk out of their asses.

    2. Re:Or maybe they know something we don't ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Candidates, as though Hillary hasn't been the president-elect since back before she was publicly running.

    3. Re:Or maybe they know something we don't ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on how vaguely the laws creating the regulating bodies are written. Congress has given up its power on many issue, handing off to various agencies. Yes that power could be taken back with a new law but that also faces veto.

      This case (student loans) I know nothing of the laws or how detailed they might be. On other issues (Pick any TLA) the president has quite a bit of power as the head of the bureaucratic branch.

    4. Re:Or maybe they know something we don't ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You're saying that presidential candidates don't tell the truth about what they'll do when in office?

    5. Re:Or maybe they know something we don't ... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "I'm going to suggest to Congress - very strongly - that we should do some unspecified thing that might make America great again".

      Doesn't really fit on a bumper sticker, does it?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Or maybe they know something we don't ... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Given the timing is it possible they were targeting Undergraduates as most of those will have their loans by now

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    7. Re:Or maybe they know something we don't ... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Only on a Humvee.

  4. Ads redirecting on mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm on mobile and I keep getting auto-redirected away from Slashdot to scammy websites.

    1. Re: Ads redirecting on mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've noticed the same trend over the past weeks with Chrome on Android. Irritating to have to clear all Chrome settings/data to remove the popups that take over Chrome.

    2. Re: Ads redirecting on mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same. They sold their soul for a few pennies. Looks like it's time to put ad block back on for slashdot.

    3. Re:Ads redirecting on mobile by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I'm on mobile and I keep getting auto-redirected away from Slashdot to scammy websites.

      Adblock browser. It is not slashdot but an adnetwork which uses another adnetwork who has a client in Russia. The same one saying my phone is infected I am getting on mainstream sites too

      Shakes head

    4. Re: Ads redirecting on mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use Simply Slashdot from the Google app store. Free, it scrapes the site and you see the stories and comments only. To reply to a comment or story, hold your finger on it for a few seconds and it will open in your browser of choice.

    5. Re: Ads redirecting on mobile by crunchy_one · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's time to put ad block back on for slashdot.

      Why on earth would you have ever go to any website with ad-blocking disabled? I only trust people that I know personally. You know, real people, not Facebook friends, and certainly not a commercial interest like Slashdot.

  5. wellsfargo owned by Hillary's Backer Warren Buffet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again Warren Buffet screws America

  6. The banks are criminal organizations by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not only do they engage in fraud, but also money laundering. To this day, they and HSBC and BoA, etc. etc. etc. remain immune and untouchable. And we continue to stand by and reelect the politicians that also benefit, totally distracted by *he who shall not be named*, not that anybody cared beforehand.

    It is probably a wise move for Amazon to keep its distance, lest they get caught up in this tornado and lose everything.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see Occupy Wall Street (or is it Black Lives Matter now?) has come to Slashdot for a visit.

    2. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Not only do they engage in fraud, but also money laundering. To this day, they and HSBC and BoA, etc. etc. etc. remain immune and untouchable. And we continue to stand by and reelect the politicians that also benefit, totally distracted by *he who shall not be named*, not that anybody cared beforehand.

      It is probably a wise move for Amazon to keep its distance, lest they get caught up in this tornado and lose everything.

      Well no shit. Gays can't marry and we need the wall ASAP to solve all our problems!

    3. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Hey, look! Vague, hand-wavy Occupy tantrum style assertions about the 6,700+ banks that operate in the United States. Are you keeping a secret dossier on each of them, which you are for special secret reasons hiding from the thousands of law enforcement officers and entities who would like to know which laws all of The Banks are breaking, until you can sell you story? It must be exhausting keep track of all of that crime being committed by hundreds of thousands of people.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      :-) Thank you for your input. You really are my favorite tag-along troll.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Not only do they engage in fraud, but also money laundering. To this day, they and HSBC and BoA, etc. etc. etc. remain immune and untouchable. And we continue to stand by and reelect the politicians that also benefit, totally distracted by *he who shall not be named*, not that anybody cared beforehand.

      It is probably a wise move for Amazon to keep its distance, lest they get caught up in this tornado and lose everything.

      Why they would get involved in the first place is a mystery to me...... Unless they thought that selling student loans and tying it to reduced prices for said students to purchase nearly everything through them. Or, perhaps, just showing student loans somehow increased students' confidence in Amazon so they just plain purchased things through them (quick bait tactic). Once the loans started to actually go through, they realized that the cost exceeds benefit. I don't know.

      Finding out what they got themselves into indicates that there was almost no planning beyond marketing, or the effing asshats at the loan companies BSed them as well as they BS students (no pun).

    6. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no shit. Gays can't marry and we need the wall ASAP to solve all our problems!

      Those are Hillary's traditional political positions, aren't they?

    7. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I know! And we can always count on you to not only post without any sort of detail or backing up of your drive-by assertions, but to make double sure that you never provide that sort of substance in any of your follow-up comments, either.

      And, are you really going to pretend that pointing out how absurd your assertion is is a case of trolling? Or are you one of those people who calls any request to back up your characterizations trolling, as an attempt to distract from the fact that you really have nothing to offer?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    8. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by negRo_slim · · Score: 0

      Hey look a snide remark from a contrarian. One thing about /. the spergs will always show up.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    9. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but also money laundering ...

      To be fair to criminals: "money laundering" in the USA is defined as a criminal buying stuff, which the US government uses to enforce civil forfeiture on the seller for being a partner in this crime of 'buying stuff'.

      The "know your client" crap the USA has forced upon the international banking system to block money laundering, is just a way for the USA to choose which shell companies can hide money in other countries.

    10. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      a snide remark from a contrarian

      You don't think that an absurd assertion about "the banks" being actual criminal operations is snide? Or are you doing along with that, while also not having any interest in backing up such a ridiculous thing to say? Nope. You just toss some lazy ad hominem at the person who points that out. Carry on, of course, if that's what makes you feel good about your world view.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      There is nothing absurd about the facts. I'm not 'asserting' anything. The events in the link are still ongoing. Amazon decided it's best to stay away, which I believe is the right thing to do. You're just shillin' bro, appealing to authority to curry favor, and so your friends think you're all cool 'n stuff. Please, continue, you're fun to watch.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    12. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's no "contrarian", merely a petulant child that likes to troll me for mocking him. Don't bother to take him seriously. I certainly don't. I think that is what upsets him more than anything.

      Posting AC because we're drifting too far off topic.

    13. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I know it's a wasted effort on you, but what the hell... something for the viewing audience

      Too big to punish

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      the banks

      Which means what, then? Specifically? Other than your usual broad innuendo.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    15. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only do they engage in fraud

      Those that do can be taken to court.

      but also money laundering

      Good for them!

      And we continue to stand by and reelect the politicians that also benefit,

      You're talking about Hillary and Fauxcahontas?

    16. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Already answered in the reply below. And we can add extortion to the list. But you will just wave it off, like always.

      Keep on trollin' my brutha!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    17. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      So when you use words, you just don't actually MEAN the ones you use. Got it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      :-) Once again you wander off into la-la-land. Exactly as predicted, any and all evidence is just pearls to the swine with you. Classic evasion, just like before. I bet you didn't bother to read those links either. Must be what intrigues me so much, the challenge of breaking through dense bone to see what's inside, like taking apart a blender to see how it works. The attraction is compelling. You bring such clarity. You answer all the questions. Very entertaining, I mean, enlightening... well, both. Thank you so very much!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    19. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Once the loans started to actually go through, they realized that the cost exceeds benefit.

      The cost being that they could be implicated in Wells Fargo's fraudulent practices and be made into the fall guy. Where Wells Fargo gets a small fine, Amazon could be wiped out, and rather than being forced to blow the whistle on what they discovered, they decided to just back away. But you are right, they were probably temporarily dazzled by the marketing opportunities. Maybe Amazon should open a savings and loan of their own. Dealing with these banks is very risky business. No matter what they do, the client always takes the hit.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    20. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      besides student loans are part of the health care law now.

    21. Re:The banks are criminal organizations by Coren22 · · Score: 1
      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  7. All student loans are sketchy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Banks are incredibly greedy, no doubt. They're always looking for new fees and new ways to prey on consumers. I nearly took out a student loan with Wells Fargo a few years ago, and I'm really glad I didn't. Federal loans are pretty sketchy, too, though. It's not the government, necessarily, that's the problem. The issue is that you get assigned to a student loan servicer. Nelnet is mine, and they're a complete disaster. I've always made my payments on time, and pay a little extra along the way, but they've claimed I've missed a payment when I didn't. Then they tried to tell me I was wrong when I claimed I didn't miss a payment. Finally, I asked which payment was late and, not being able to tell me, they admitted they were wrong. The next month they again claimed I'd missed a payment and, upon me threatening to report them to the BBB and attorney general and threatening to sue them, the problem magically got fixed. I've concluded that ALL student loans are sketchy, and I can't wait to pay mine off and never look back.

    1. Re:All student loans are sketchy by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Banks are incredibly greedy, no doubt. They're always looking for new fees and new ways to prey on consumers. I nearly took out a student loan with Wells Fargo a few years ago, and I'm really glad I didn't. Federal loans are pretty sketchy, too, though. It's not the government, necessarily, that's the problem. The issue is that you get assigned to a student loan servicer. Nelnet is mine, and they're a complete disaster. I've always made my payments on time, and pay a little extra along the way, but they've claimed I've missed a payment when I didn't. Then they tried to tell me I was wrong when I claimed I didn't miss a payment. Finally, I asked which payment was late and, not being able to tell me, they admitted they were wrong. The next month they again claimed I'd missed a payment and, upon me threatening to report them to the BBB and attorney general and threatening to sue them, the problem magically got fixed. I've concluded that ALL student loans are sketchy, and I can't wait to pay mine off and never look back.

      I do not intend to be off-topic (and certainly hope I'm not), but I don't understand how the lucky (who have stories to tell about it) people that got BS/MS/PhD degrees managed to not pay a cent, or only a 1% fee on their loans. What did the loan "companies" have to gain from those individuals versus people with almost identical SAT/etc scores that got shafted with the generic bait and hidden-text switch regular student loan method? Is it like the way they target torrent downloaders/hosts - just do a random pick of a few in a state with hard laws and go with those?

      Shrug.

    2. Re:All student loans are sketchy by slew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Banks are incredibly greedy, no doubt. They're always looking for new fees and new ways to prey on consumers. I nearly took out a student loan with Wells Fargo a few years ago, and I'm really glad I didn't. Federal loans are pretty sketchy, too, though. It's not the government, necessarily, that's the problem. The issue is that you get assigned to a student loan servicer. Nelnet is mine, and they're a complete disaster. I've always made my payments on time, and pay a little extra along the way, but they've claimed I've missed a payment when I didn't. Then they tried to tell me I was wrong when I claimed I didn't miss a payment. Finally, I asked which payment was late and, not being able to tell me, they admitted they were wrong. The next month they again claimed I'd missed a payment and, upon me threatening to report them to the BBB and attorney general and threatening to sue them, the problem magically got fixed. I've concluded that ALL student loans are sketchy, and I can't wait to pay mine off and never look back.

      I do not intend to be off-topic (and certainly hope I'm not), but I don't understand how the lucky (who have stories to tell about it) people that got BS/MS/PhD degrees managed to not pay a cent, or only a 1% fee on their loans. What did the loan "companies" have to gain from those individuals versus people with almost identical SAT/etc scores that got shafted with the generic bait and hidden-text switch regular student loan method? Is it like the way they target torrent downloaders/hosts - just do a random pick of a few in a state with hard laws and go with those?

      Shrug.

      Since you don't get pick which company gets to service your loan and since loans are batched up and transferred to serviced pretty much ad-hoc, it might as well be randomly assigned from the perspective of the borrower. Don't worry, it has nothing to do with your SAT score. Loan servicers bid for contracts to service loans (e.g., keep track of payments) on behalf of the holder of the loan. Like with many things, some servicers bid low and hope to make it up in fees, some might be more reputable but of course they make less money.

      Not saying wells fargo (or other banks and loan originators), are without blame (no doubt they continue to do business with shady loan servicers as well), but it is also quite likely that the originator of the loan packaged your loan into a big pool and sold them to an investment company. That investment company is free to work with these shady loan servicers (and may even potentially be in cahoots with them) to squeeze out every penny from you to maximize the return on their investment. This happens with all types of loans (house, car, student, personal, etc) and is not restricted to student loans. In fact most originators sell your loan pretty much immediately to such investment companies, so they have more money to create new loans (that is how they make money).

      Lest you think originators reselling loans in pools is something only underhanded companies do, two of the biggest USA government chartered companies FannieMae and FreddieMac were created for exactly this purpose: to buy loan pools from loan originators, package them up as bonds and sell them as investments. This was seen as an essential function to make sure that loan originators always had enough liquidity to finance non-FHA conforming loans (loan originators could buy GNMA insurance for FHA conforming loans and securitize them in to US treasury backed GinnieMae bonds, but not non-conforming loans).

      Unfortunately, this whole idea of a secondary market for loan pools is what many believe contributed to the 2008 crash. Since investment companies were making so much money from these loan pools (buying them from originators and reselling them to investors), they wanted any loan pools they could get their hands on. Since AAA rated pools equivalent to FHA loans through FannieMae and FreddieMac were in short supply, investment companies bought lower rated

    3. Re:All student loans are sketchy by hazem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I really hate the for-profit servicers as well. "Obtuse" is a polite term for them. I really miss when my loan was serviced directly by the Department of Education.

      To deal with this kind of issue (I had this with Verizon), I encode my payment amount so I can know what's paid and when. For example, let's say the actual amount due is $253.12. I'll put the month as the last dollars and the cents for the day. So making that payment on June 4th, I'd actually pay $256.04. A payment on July 3rd would be $257.03. So even if they don't post it to my account for 2 months, I know which payment it was.

      Next, use your bank/credit-union's bill pay to send payments so you have an audit-trail. NEVER let them draft from your account - it's just not worth the .25% rate break.

      Lastly, if they're servicing federal loans and still jerking you around, write to your senators and congresspeople. They have staff who are good at helping un-f*ck bureaucratic organizations.

    4. Re: All student loans are sketchy by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      That was very in-depth and quite educational. I've seen plenty of stuff about other loan types; pretty much describes what you said. That means I know what you're saying, though my in-depth knowledge barely breaks the proverbial meniscus.

      What I don't understand is the difference between people who got loans in, let's say, 1998, and didn't have to pay a single cent on their own and made it all the way through to a PhD. Still owe no money. Pretty much a grant, I'd assume. Persons with the same scores coming from the same school would apply for this "grant", which was nothing but a "super special high score personal loan" at the time at the knowledge of the student, but they were actually thrown into the common loan pool to drown.

      What I'm trying to figure out is what differentiates one student from the other, and WHO did it in a way that the student thought they were in the same "grant" status as the other.

      Can you tell I didn't go through the college loan process? Har har.

      Every person who did get a loan doesn't want to talk about it but is so pissed that they basically say they will be paying on this loan until their 50s, if they're lucky. Their words and mumbles, not mine.

    5. Re: All student loans are sketchy by slew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, of course very school is different, but it has been my observation that the people working financial aid dept for colleges are more concentrating on getting people financed (either through grants/loans), than the actual terms of that financing.

      I don't blame them, I know how hard they work, and the are overworked and underappreciated, but their goal is really to get everyone matriculated to be financed (because, generally, they won't be able to attend if they aren't financed). If you want to think about it, it's like Tetris, they have lots of weird blocks of funding (grants, loans, fellowships, etc) that become available at different time to fit to the students empty coffers which appear as they matriculate and sometimes they just need to fill up a row of students because time is of the essence and they generally don't look back to see if it was optimal or not once a row of students is retired and shifted away. When it is done and the whole class is financed, they declare success and move on to their next task (raising funding for next quarter), but unfortunately it is the students that experience the indigestion that can be the result of their efforts.

      The sad part of this is that most students approach educational funding the same way. If they get financed, they win, and generally don't think about the terms. People may lament the apparent unfairness of this lottery based funding system for higher education, but it is the current reality. IMO, part the issue is the fact that students often will opt for a specific educational path regardless of the cost to them specifically blindly believing that a head-in-the-sand approach to educational financing will yield them their desired result. We have sex-ed in secondary school, why we don't have financial-ed is beyond me.

      Your lament seems to be reminiscent to a group of friends sitting around with some beers some complaining how some people got to have unprotected sex in high school and it didn't result in a pregnancy or some dreaded STD, yet others experienced life changing results with their singular lapse in judgement. Perhaps those that dodged the bullet, just got incredibly lucky with their inordinate risk.

      Quantum mechanics tells us that end results in the universe are often only statistical, not deterministic. Since we can't live in a basement, we often need to take risks which potentially have statistical results from time to time, but we know that statistically better (but not guaranteed) outcomes result from calculated risks, not hopeful risks. We can bemoan dependence on luck, but remember, funding for anything (including higher education) is a scare resource and sometime the fairest way to distribute such a resource is by drawing straws. Sometimes you have to ask yourself if a 1550 SAT really statistically better than 1600 based on 1 sampling point taken at one point in time and if it would actually be fair to distribute resources based on a potential statistical anomaly...

    6. Re: All student loans are sketchy by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That was one of the most informative and educational, while analytical and based on direct and scientific observations and sharing things I rarely see the ilk of. Basically, thank you for not being an asshole. Your information is as well-worded as I believe any can be. You know, without getting a gag order.

      Humor aside, thank you again for real information and helping someone keep their head on straight, knowing that the disgusting actions and reactions observed are not always based on ill will or even fractional knowledge of what one is doing. If finance-ed ever makes it to a ballot, I will attempt to not place a plus sign next to my vote. Plus sign... Reading sex-ed above has starting the humor engine again. Cheers!

    7. Re:All student loans are sketchy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they've claimed I've missed a payment when I didn't. Then they tried to tell me I was wrong when I claimed I didn't miss a payment. Finally, I asked which payment was late and, not being able to tell me, they admitted they were wrong. The next month they again claimed I'd missed a payment and,

      Clearly a case of low income office worker cock-up. Even the tax authorities can do this shit, so be ware!

      me threatening to report them to the BBB and attorney general and threatening to sue them, the problem magically got fixed.

      Somebody who cared enough audited your information at this point and managed to correct the typos and missing information in the loan tracking system. What a world of pain people have to go through just because some summer intern can't wait to run off to the cool parties, smoking some weed (in the US context) or shopping with friends.
        The 14% interest is like it's the 70's housing mortgage market here again. At least it's little better than the quick loan market with it's legalized mafia-style interests.

    8. Re: All student loans are sketchy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that any state funded college in the united states gets funding based upon both enrollment and retention. So higher enrollments = higher FTE ( full time equivalent ) counts and usually more funding ( or at least the institution can point to increasing numbers when it's time to beg for more money). So everyone, including grants and loans, gets pressured. The goal isn't to educate students its to maintain funding to keep the institution alive.

  8. Re: wellsfargo owned by Hillary's Backer Warren Bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wells Fargo neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing."

    Because of course they didn't.

    What's good for the banks is good for America.

    When the banks do it, it's not illegal.

    Sarcasm, etc etc

  9. The Fine ate the profits by Dracos · · Score: 2

    The CFPB fine probably ate enough of the projected profits to make the program not worth continuing (which means they'd have to fix the issues).

    Impressive that the stage coach is still blatantly robbing people.

  10. the schools and banks need to Beer some if risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The impossible to discharge needs to go away

    1. Re:the schools and banks need to Beer some if risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im not sure Google translate puts across the message you were intending but in reply to your post: I also like potato

    2. Re:the schools and banks need to Beer some if risk by laurencetux · · Score: 1

      just so this is explained for future readers a while back if you filed bankruptcy then Student Loans got tossed in the pile of "okay this is how much blood is in this stone so y'all have fun trying to divide it" and most of the times all that was left was a couple grams of plasma.

      One of the "reforms" to bankruptcy law changed that and Student Loans got put in the "Nice try You still Owe this money" pile (round the same time these got to be backed by The Fed).

  11. Capitalism... by johanw · · Score: 1

    Fortunately in the country I live, the state offers student loans with low rents (something entirely against the US ideology that the private sector has to do everything). If you can't it pay back in 15 years (minimum payback amount depends on your income) you don't have to pay back the restant. It is considered an investment in a highly educated population, which is itself good for the economy. Add to that that university here is much cheaper than in the US (college money is about 2000 euro's per year, plus costs of books etc.) so the amounts you need to loan are much lower as well. You can borrow money from a bank for your study if you wish of course, but since there is no demand for such loans because the state loans are cheaper they are not even offered.

    This causes that almost anyone with the capacity and willingness to do so can get a batchelor and master degree independent of the income of their parents. We don't need H1B imports.

    1. Re:Capitalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately in the country I live, the state offers student loans with low rents (something entirely against the US ideology that the private sector has to do everything)

      I'm not sure what you think is "fortunate" about large numbers of students wasting their time in government-run universities getting useless degrees.

      This causes that almost anyone with the capacity and willingness to do so can get a batchelor and master degree independent of the income of their parents. We don't need H1B imports.

      Most likely, you can't get H1B imports because (1) your country is hostile to foreigners and always treats them as second class citizens, and (2) your country is so undesirable, has such high taxes, and pays such low wages that you can't get "H1B imports".

      (You don't say what the "country you live" actually is, but what I said is pretty much true of all the northern European nations. I know: I emigrated from one.)

    2. Re:Capitalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whenever the government subsidizes something, whether that be food, medicine, gasoline, housing or yes education people consume more of it and tend to care less about the quality because they (mostly) aren't paying for it. As demonstrated by the 2008 financial crises and housing bust, this can lead to all sorts of perverse economic outcomes. People should be careful about cheerleading for more government subsidies, it may actually make everyone worse off on in the long run.

    3. Re:Capitalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you I guess, we are all very jealous of you now. There, happy?

    4. Re:Capitalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could.
      Or alternatively you could get a situation like the in US, where the students loan money from banks, so the universities can just increase the price of admission ad infinitum, since students will just borrow more money.
      Meanwhile over here, students will get their government loan and make due with that.
      Yes, you get some students who waste years, but there are ways around this, like ending subsidies for not completing a course in a certain number of years.

    5. Re:Capitalism... by johanw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I live in The Netherlands. Yes, we pay more tax than in the US, but we do get something in return for it, not just an overblown military sector or roads and bridges that are falling apart due to lack of maintenance (reminds me of the former USSR, no mainetance is often a sure sign of an empire in decline).

      Government-run universities may be of low quality in the US, but our universities are top notch. Perhaps MIT or Caltech are even better, but the general level is high. And of course some students will "waste their time" on a study that is not directly usefull, or will fail to graduate. That's the risk of an investment in education. However, that risk is quite small and the large picture is largely positive. Besides, if you have not passed all your 1st year exams after 2 years the student loan is stopped anyway. That weeds out most of the students that are incapable of succeeding.

  12. So? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

    Interest rates on Wells undergraduate loans for four-year colleges range from 5.94 percent to nearly 11 percent on a fixed-rate loan and 3.39 percent to 9.03 percent on a variable-rate loan. Rates on the bank’s loans for community and for-profit colleges can climb to nearly 14 percent. That’s a far cry from the pricing the government offers. The government charges undergraduates 3.76 percent interest and graduate students 5.31 percent interest on new loans for the 2016-2017 academic year. Federal loans are only offered at fixed rates, and students don’t need co-signers with stellar credit to qualify for the lowest rate.

    Instead of getting all upset, people should then simply take the federal loan instead of the Wells loans. If they can't get the federal loans for some reason, then it seems unreasonable to demand that private banks match federal rates.

    Pauline Abernathy (TICAS): "Students should consider other schools if a school requires them to take out a private loan."

    So, if you want to take out a 7% loan to get a $2400 Nanodegree on Udacity, Pauline wants to stop you; she wants you to put that on your credit card at 20% or, "better" yet, spend tens of thousands of dollars and waste several years of your life at the kind of institutions she is in bed with. And she probably thinks that she is doing you some good by forcing you to do this.

    This is a textbook example of why costs in the US educational system are spiraling out of control:

    1. Re:So? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Interest rates on Wells undergraduate loans for four-year colleges range from 5.94 percent to nearly 11 percent on a fixed-rate loan and 3.39 percent to 9.03 percent on a variable-rate loan. Rates on the bank’s loans for community and for-profit colleges can climb to nearly 14 percent. That’s a far cry from the pricing the government offers. The government charges undergraduates 3.76 percent interest and graduate students 5.31 percent interest on new loans for the 2016-2017 academic year. Federal loans are only offered at fixed rates, and students don’t need co-signers with stellar credit to qualify for the lowest rate.

      Instead of getting all upset, people should then simply take the federal loan instead of the Wells loans. If they can't get the federal loans for some reason, then it seems unreasonable to demand that private banks match federal rates.

      Pauline Abernathy (TICAS): "Students should consider other schools if a school requires them to take out a private loan."

      So, if you want to take out a 7% loan to get a $2400 Nanodegree on Udacity, Pauline wants to stop you; she wants you to put that on your credit card at 20% or, "better" yet, spend tens of thousands of dollars and waste several years of your life at the kind of institutions she is in bed with. And she probably thinks that she is doing you some good by forcing you to do this.

      This is a textbook example of why costs in the US educational system are spiraling out of control:

      Well duh. You give out free money the cost of goods go up!

      Same with healthcare. The more laws you put down where anyone can make money and be required by law to pay you no shit the CEO's are going to jerk up prices to the sky. Insulin that used to cost $45 a shot in 2001 is now $3000! Why? Well why not free money right?

      Car insurance used to be dirt cheap before it was required law. Now the federal government guarantees you can't loose money and wall street brokers will sell your debt for a gain so people raise the prices.

    2. Re:So? by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      Well duh. You give out free money the cost of goods go up!

      Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be obvious to the voters who keep voting for the crony capitalists that support such laws.

  13. Maybe it dawned on them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Students will bitch and moan regardless of (how good) the terms of the loan are and do what they can to not pay that money back.

  14. This kind of behavior should not surprise people by Sqreater · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The education industry part of the macro-parasite (comprised of government, finance, and business - and which has as one goal: the gathering to itself of all the assets of the mass of people), has identified and targeted the college education as an asset of the mass due to the increase of future earnings that can be expected with a college degree. I've read that increase in future earnings can be a million dollars over a lifetime. Universities and businesses want that money and they will engage in any immoral or illegal activity they have to in order to get it. Tuitions continue to rise in a time of low inflation and low interest rates. There is now over a trillion dollars in student loan debt. That is more than all credit card debt. The mass is being preyed upon with an avidity and efficiency never before seen by man.

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  15. The Movement for Black Lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Movement for Black Lives (not be confused with Black Lives Matter) is the current organization calling cracking down on big banks. They share some ideological positions with the Green Party.

  16. No hard assets to seize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with student loans, is that there are no hard assets to seize if the owner goes bankrupt. With car loans, you can seize, and sell the used car. With a house loan, you can kick out the owner, and sell the used house.

  17. a highly formally educated populace is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pfft, you only need ~1/3 of the populace to be highly formally educated. If there is a lot of money in knowing a particular area of expertise, people will learn it. A populace does not need a bunch of degrees in women's studies. There are all sorts of universities with lower in state tuition, and community colleges.

    Also, the United States has many dull, boring cities with low rent.

  18. Re:This kind of behavior should not surprise peopl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... engage in any immoral or illegal activity they have to ...

    I disagree: The businesses are engaging only in the illegal activity the government allows: Onerous contracts with youngsters guaranteeing free money from the US government. If the government really cared, they would send each student a 'Know your rights' brochure listing the departments describing scams the student must be wary of, plus the departments charged with preventing such abuses.

    The way to fix this is rather easy to find: The single-buyer system. That is, the government sets a price per subject (tiered by school, thus medical subjects earn more than IT subjects), plus a maximum of, say, 40 subjects subsidized per student. That leaves the universities free to charge more and the banks free to loan more; it just won't be subsidized by the government. Once again, much of the world already uses the single-buyer system for tertiary education.

  19. Do you know how money is created? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://positivemoney.org/

    Without this information - that 97% of money is created - out of thin air - by banks, you cannot understand what's really going on in the world.

  20. Re: the schools and banks need to Beer some if ris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I took out my student loans, I believed (even at that time) that my nonprofit but expensive four-year college explained things to me very well. I understood what I was doing before I signed even one loan document. My impression is that kids today are not being told the truth about these student loans. Nobody's pointing out to them that this debt is something even death can't automatically discharge.

      There are grandparents of dead students who cosigned on their grandchildren's student loans. The kids off themselves for variety of reasons and guess what? A portion of Grandma's Social Security retirement check is being garnished every month for the rest of her life to pay back that student loan. None of the standard laws that apply to debt collectors are true with student loans.

    There is no statute of limitations, you cannot discharge the debt in bankruptcy, and income that would normally be exempt from debt collection garnishment, such as disability or retirement checks, is not protected income under the law. At the very least, the government can legally garnish every single tax return refund every year for the rest of your life, until that debt is paid in full. And that final debt you owe could be hundreds of thousands of dollars more than you actually borrowed to attend college. The debt collector gets to add on late fees, delinquency fees, court fees and all other kinds of bogus charges. The college I attended made all of this very clear to me before I signed even one student loan document, but later on in my life, when I went back to school and attended a community college for a refresher courses in my major, you would have thought that money was free, based on the way the school presented the deal to me.

  21. Scumbag Republicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have given the banks EVERYTHING they want.

    The whole lot deserves to die in a fire.