Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Helps Develop Smart, IoT-Enabled Refrigerators (microsoft.com)

An anonymous Slashdot reader writes: Promising "intelligent food management" to help with shopping and meal planning, Microsoft is collaborating with household appliance manufacturer Liebherr to develop a refrigerator where stored groceries "can be monitored using internal cameras." The refrigerators will use Microsoft's object recognition technology to create a list of your groceries -- with photos -- accessible via an an Android or iOS app (or a Windows device).

"Microsoft is providing computer vision capability as part of this collaboration," says their web page, citing the deep-learning technology underlying the Microsoft Cognitive Services Computer Vision API, released in Microsoft's open source Computational Network Toolkit. "Using the deep learning algorithms contained within CNTK, Microsoft data scientists worked with Liebherr to build a new image processing system to detect specific food products present inside a Liebherr refrigerator..."

118 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Pharmaceuticals by tal_mud · · Score: 3, Funny

    If I installed this on my fridge I would use the app when I went to the pharmacy. That way I could check up on which antibiotics where already growing in my fridge.

    1. Re:Pharmaceuticals by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I'd use it to see how much open sauce there is in my fridge.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Pharmaceuticals by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Technology like this could enable men to find the barbecue sauce even if it were behind something else on the shelf. I predict a significant increase in the birth rate.

    3. Re:Pharmaceuticals by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Japanese fridges already kinda do this. I think it was Sharp that introduced it. When they detect mould growing a light comes on, and the newer models connect to wi-fi and talk to a phone app.

      The good news is that from memory they only operate on your LAN, not via the net.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Pharmaceuticals by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Japanese fridges already kinda do this. I think it was Sharp that introduced it. When they detect mould growing a light comes on, and the newer models connect to wi-fi and talk to a phone app.

      The good news is that from memory they only operate on your LAN, not via the net.

      Great- so not only will someone be able to hack my fridge- they'll be able to laugh at all the mold I've got growing too!

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  2. Fucking Useless Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. designed to get people more used to having cameras and other sensory equipment all around them.

    1. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by Calydor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, the sensor broke?

      The cooling element gets disabled and the refrigerator needs to be repaired.

      Same way you can't scan a black and white paper if your all-in-one printer and scanner is out of cyan ink.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You disabled the sensor, so the warranty is void. Yes, the cooling element is highly dependent on the visual sensor so we cannot grant your warranty claim, so sorry.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      But what's more intresting: Which idiot would buy a smart fridge with cameras and network connection just to disable cameras and network connection? INstead of buying a regular fridge for half the price...

      --
      bickerdyke
    4. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because eventually there won't be any regular refrigerators. Have you searched lately for a television that's not a smart tv?

    5. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      In the 90s Epson disabled black and white printing even though the printer had four cartridges for CMYK.
      Mom rushed to buy an overpriced namebrand black cartridge and it refused to print.
      Later, the printer was ruined anyway since an inkjet that doesn't print for a month gets that way, ruined.
      A black and white laser printer is a better solution since
      - there is only one color, so you can't be ripped off that way
      - it still works even if you don't use it
      It used to be 10x more expensive than a color inkjet, but not anymore.
      Some people buy an inkjet a year for the "printing season" related to a home business.

    6. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      This is Microsoft. Periodically the fridge will lock up - like because of the bug where it you put a jam jar with an expiration date whose month is an odd number on the middle shelf between leftover Chinese takeout and a can of soda,

      To reset the fridge and resume cooling, you will have to press the refrigerator-side door closed while cycling the icemaker and lifting up on the water dispenser lever.

    7. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

      If you're using all 3 colors to simulate black you screwed up when buying the printer.

      I guess that's a fair assessment for me since I had a printer that did that even if you told it to just use black but I should have known better. It was an HP printer. (Only way to get it to not use color ink to do black was to remove the color ink cartridge and leave the black one in.)

      --
      Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    8. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

      But I have directly seen printers that locked you out of everything until you replace the ink cartridges.

      If the colour cartridges are empty then how can they print the yellow dots that lets the government know which printer was used ?

    9. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Please try to Google for the sentence "Can't scan with no ink" and look at all the results. Then come back here and say that again with such certainty.

      The reason I specifically said 'cyan' ink was because that should never, never be needed for anything that has to do with black and white, not printing and certainly not SCANNING.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    10. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might have noticed that TVs are actually cheaper than comparable computer monitors. One has to wonder why...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That could create some interesting liabilities for the manufacturer. If your electricity goes out and the contents of your fridge are lost you can claim for them in many European countries. So if some non essential part fails and it results in an avoidable, unreasonable loss...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Fucking Useless Shit by kheldan · · Score: 1

      designed to get people more used to having cameras and other sensory equipment all around them

      Exactly, precisely this. Why the actual FUCK do you need cameras in your gods-be-damned refrigerator in the first place, and why the actual FUCK does it need to be connected to the Internet at all in the first place? This is more stupid, trendy, useless so-called 'internet of things' crap that has no real useful purpose -- except maybe as previously stated, to put more gods-be-damned surveillance in our lives. What's next? IoT toilet, that monitors your pooping? Sends directly to your doctor? TO HELL WITH THIS SHIT. Reject the so-called 'Internet of Things', it does nothing to enhance your life, all it does is create more ways for corporations and three-letter government agencies to track and monitor you and otherwise stick their noses into you personal, very-much-private lives. Them, them, fuck them, sideways with a rusty chainsaw.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    13. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by kheldan · · Score: 1

      That's exactly why no one should be encouraged to buy such stupid things as an 'internet connected refrigerator' in the first place. This is 'technology' that NEEDS TO DIE QUICKLY. No one needs an 'internet connected refrigerator' in the first place, either. Also, fear not: There will always be a need for lower-end refrigerators because so many people are poor, and more people are going to be poor in the future. Even so, if you're stuck buying something that wants to be internet connected, they'll have to have some way for it to work normally without out, because poor immigrant families won't necessarily have internet -- so all you'd have to do is call them up and say you don't have and can't afford internet, and someone bought the refrigerator for you, and all your food is going to spoil how do I get this thing to work OMG my kids are going to starve!1!! and there'll be a way to make the damned thing work. Then you put tape over the camera(s) anyway and not worry about it. Manufacturers that get too many returns on crap like this because people literally can't use it are going to make sure it can work anyway.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    14. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by kheldan · · Score: 1

      There will always be a market for lower-end appliances because there are poor people and will be more poor people in the future because of the downward spiral we're all in economy-wise; the 1% in control of 99% of the wealth of the world will just tighten their grip and DGAF about the 99%, just like always. So there will always be plain-old-refrigerators and TVs, and even if not there will be ways to activate and use them without internet, because poor people can't afford internet, now can they? Manufacturers don't like returns for things people can't use so there'll be a way to make the basic functionality work.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    15. Re:Fucking Useless Shit by bjwest · · Score: 1

      Holly mother of god DUDE! WTF is wrong with you?? Don't you know if we don't IaTT right fucking now, we might as well start slinging clubs and dancing around the campfire again. CHRIST! What the actual FUCK is wrong with you?!? IoT, dude it's the fucking Internet of THINGS. Fucking THINGS ON THE INTERNET!!!

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    16. Re: Fucking Useless Shit by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      Normally that would more likely have to do with quality. Clarity of each pixel is usually demanded to be sharper for computers than TVs, etc.

    17. Re:Fucking Useless Shit by kheldan · · Score: 1




      Need I say more?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    18. Re:Fucking Useless Shit by kheldan · · Score: 1

      (image)
      (image)
      (article)
      Had to re-post because /. is apparently retarded in the way it posts hyperlinks that contain no text. :-(

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    19. Re:Fucking Useless Shit by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Oh, for mod points today... +2

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  3. Smart refrigerators by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A solution in search of a problem.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Smart refrigerators by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is lack of business for MS, the solution is clearly a fridge that you have to pay SW licenses for.

    2. Re:Smart refrigerators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually there is one feature that looks handy: the camera. I've often been at the supermarket and thought "hang on, do I need milk/eggs/whatever?" The rest though? Meh. And I'm not cool with paying more that $50 or so extra for the camera either.

    3. Re:Smart refrigerators by NotInHere · · Score: 1

      Problem: how do we get more data to sell and lock in our customers to buying our products?

      Solution: smart devices!

    4. Re:Smart refrigerators by brad3378 · · Score: 2

      It would also work much better if RFID tags were embedded in food packaging.

      --

    5. Re:Smart refrigerators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hardly an insightful comment. You don't push the boundaries of technology and what can be accomplished by sitting on your hands and saying "OK, what we've got works fine, let's forget about trying to see what else we can do with it".

    6. Re:Smart refrigerators by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


      You obviously cannot see problems but let me illuminate you by suggestion what the features of a smart fridge are.

      Facebook status updates; We're run out of tomatoes!

      Twitter feedback; After 2 hours of refrigeration we have discarded your new product because it sucks!

      Family alerts (via facebook); We've run out of tomatoes!!

      Intrusion detection; "Toddler attempting to open fridge door. Deploying countermeasures!"

      MaaS (Maintenance as a Service; Fridge printer ink running low, please consider replacement.

      Seamless integration; update to phone (via Facebook) - friedge temperature decreased by 20c so your coke can be cold in-time for pizza before your favourite show.



      Sure you might think this is useless but soon people will not remember a time when their fridge didn't have a GUI. A fridge that cannot reboot would be looked upon like a CRT B/W television.

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    7. Re: Smart refrigerators by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      And the next step from there is "it would work much better if RFID tags were embedded in people."

      Though they already can track you by the chip in your pet ... your passport ... the tag hidden in your Nikes that was personalized at the checkout counter when you bought them ...

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:Smart refrigerators by coofercat · · Score: 1

      What about the stuff from the pick your own, or the local farmer's market?

      I agree this looks like a terrible way to go about this 'problem', but there are lots of likewise terrible ideas looking for this 'problem'.

    9. Re:Smart refrigerators by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You obviously cannot see problems but let me illuminate you by suggestion what the features of a smart fridge are. Facebook status updates; We're run out of tomatoes!

      You forgot the most obvious one:

      A Windows 10 refrigerator edition update screws up your compressor driver and the fridge blue doors and spoils all your food, then Slashdot shills call you an idiot because you weren't running the thing in VM mode.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    10. Re:Smart refrigerators by dohzer · · Score: 1

      How about just buying it and using it twice if you already had it?
      Or do you have to cook every meal to a recipe in a weekly plan?

    11. Re:Smart refrigerators by bluegutang · · Score: 1

      The problem is insurance companies don't know enough about your diet and lifestyle. This allows them to know.

    12. Re:Smart refrigerators by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Most IoT stuff, like his fridge, are really stupid. Like the IoT kitchen stove you can turn on with your phone... WTF??? You DON'T want the stove on when you're not home!

      Adjust the A/C with a phone? What, you're too damned lazy to walk across the room? Stupid! If I can turn off the heat with my phone, so can the FSB.

      I may have to buy a TV even though the one I have works perfectly fine, because it may not be long before you can no longer buy a dumb TV.

      It's bad enough that my computers and phone are hackable, I don't want anything else I own on the internet at all.

      People are stupid, though, "Ooh! Shiny!"

    13. Re:Smart refrigerators by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Your milk and egg cartons are transparent? You keep paper towels and canned goods and spices in the fridge?

    14. Re:Smart refrigerators by fl_litig8r · · Score: 1

      Your milk and egg cartons are transparent?

      Actually, both of mine are, so it's not unheard of. My gallon of milk is in a plastic container you can see through and I buy eggs in a 30-pack that has a clear top and bottom plastic enclosure (which also makes it easier to to check for broken eggs at the store).

    15. Re:Smart refrigerators by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      A solution in search of a problem.

      Indeed. An unwanted solution in search of a non-existent problem.

      "The refrigerators will use Microsoft's object recognition technology to create a list of your groceries..."

      Great...I can't wait to pay thousands of dollars for Microsoft to do what I've happily been doing for years with a pencil and paper.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    16. Re:Smart refrigerators by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Not entirely. If combined with heat storage, a smart refrigerator could take advantage of time-of-day pricing where available.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re:Smart refrigerators by bjwest · · Score: 1

      This is why I use OurGroceries (not affiliated in any way, just love the app) and add things as I need them.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    18. Re:Smart refrigerators by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The thing is the IoT world has plenty of business for MS, especially in industrial and business-to-business settings which pay far higher license fees than any shit screen glued to a fridge door ever wood.

      I just really don't understand this announcement. By all other accounts MS was a serious IoT company and now they pull this we have a lightbulb you can change colour from the internet garbage. For shame!

    19. Re:Smart refrigerators by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      It will be a smart refrigerator but you'll have to leave the door open because the camera won't work without the light.

  4. Hmm. by buss_error · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a solution in search of a problem to solve. What's wrong with a note pad and a pen on the fridge's door? That's what I've been using since DARPANET.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  5. And when the information gets sold by Calydor · · Score: 2

    Health insurance goes up because you're not eating healthy enough, police have free access to all these cameras to make sure no one's storing drugs in their fridge etc.

    Because writing 'Milk' on a list when you take the last carton of milk is such a daunting task!

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:And when the information gets sold by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Screw you and your first world problems. Milk. As long as it's quite, liquid and mixes ok with the coffee it is ok.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:And when the information gets sold by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Only your body.

      And that of every other goon asking that silly question.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:And when the information gets sold by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Quite what?

      P.S. If you put milk in coffee, you're a fucking savage.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:And when the information gets sold by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      White, not quite. Brain fart leading to a wrong word being typed. Don't ask me to write legibly before I had my first coffee.

      And yes. With milk. The creamy swirl in the melange between the black of the coffee and the white of the milk is what keeps me believing in culture, civilization and dignity.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:And when the information gets sold by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Quite what?

      P.S. If you put milk in coffee, you're a fucking savage.

      How about sugar? Chocolate sprinkles? Little cocktail umbrellas?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  6. Good by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 4, Funny

    I really need one of these

    1. Re:Good by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      Yes, Me too. I'll get one right away as soon as I have something to put in it.

      --
      home
  7. The idiocy of the reporting by jandersen · · Score: 1

    - tends to obscure the usefulness of the technology, as usual. The socalled IoT has a lot of very promising uses, none of which have anything to do with spying on people. Just think of finding parking spaces - a very mundane task, and something that can make a visit to a cuty centre daunting. There will usually be a legal parking space somewhere, but how do you find it? If all spaces had an IP address and a number plate recognition camera, you could book you space in advance, and be sure that anybody who parked in you space would be fined. I would give my left arm for that - or somebody's left arm at least.

    I listened to a programme recently about energy and how to use the production capacity optimally. The problem now is that we have to have enough capacity to cover surges in demand; like when everybody goes to put the electric kettle on when there is a break in the TV programmes. With a bit (well, quite a bit) of clever, automatic management, if certain equipments were on the IoT, they could be told to hold back on their energy needs just while there is a short surge in demand. These equipments could be small (but numerous) things fridges and freezers, or big things like the bitumen heaters in a factory that produces asphalt coatings for roads. They don't actually needs to be active at set intervals - they could certainly wait 15 minutes without problems. Apparently this alone could help us stretch our energy capacity a lot.

    Regrettably, all you see headlines about is nonsense like this, about how bloody cool it would be to have a camera inside you fridge or whatever. Even at best, this is no more than a mildly amusing gimmick that comes along for the ride and tries to steal the show from the actual, serious importance of the IoT.

    1. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      none of which have anything to do with spying on people

      You are very naively disregarding the problem of spying. Advertisers will take any and all data they can legally get their hands on. EULA's allow us all to sign our privacy away to provide the "optimal user experience". Windows 10, Smart TVs, store loyalty cards, IoT devices, browser plugins, tracking cookies, FaceBook messages, Smartphone apps that access device ID etc... all sources of data that help to erode our privacy.

      That's not even starting on the security aspect of IoT. It will be a nightmare.

    2. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There has been some discussion about booking chargers for EVs at given times, but it's generally thought of as a bad solution to the problem of there not being enough chargers. People book and then don't turn up or get delayed, and it requires forward planning which is something that EV drivers want to get away from. With a petrol car you just jump in and drive, with an EV if you are going beyond your range you at least want to check that the charger you plan to use is working and that there are alternatives. That's why 200+ miles range is attractive.

      The same problems apply to parking spaces. People don't want to book, they just want to park. And what if someone does take your booked space, okay they can be fined but you still can't park there until they move. What you want is an app that can tell you where free spaces are so you can save time by not driving around looking for one.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re: The idiocy of the reporting by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      Really? Mind Blown?
      I have seen these things all over the world - Hell - I have seen them in New Zealand, where hobbits roam the mountains.

      And, of course, none of it needs 'networked sensors and signs' in any IoT way, its good old sensors and a controller somewhere - probably a per floor controller.
      There are often road signs around the cities telling you how many spaces are left in which buildings.
      Nice solid 1980s tech, nothing to see here. No IoT required.

    4. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      In your scenario, the only result would be that you pay for the parking spot. And not from the moment that you put your car there, but from the moment you reserve that parking spot. And you better reserve early, because everyone wants one and not everyone gets one, so instead of paying for the time you're there, get prepared to pay for the whole day, in the end resulting in even FEWER legal parking spot because everyone would ensure they have one and reserve one from 10am to midnight 'cause they will want one from 6pm to 8pm but reserving it from 10am onward is the only way to make sure you actually still get one.

      In the end, what you'll get is a load of empty parking spots that you cannot use because, officially, they are taken.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by mlush · · Score: 1

      I think the more general problem with the IoT is that it's putting a vast population of ageing, unpatched and unmaintained computers onto the Internet running applications who's sole aim is to get them to market ASAP. I would expect a fridge to last anything up to 15 years I don't see Microsoft supporting Windows 98, LED lightbulbs should last 25 years and at end of life would be running the equivalent of Windows 3.1. Probably the only good thing is that at least its not a monocluture :-(

    6. Re: The idiocy of the reporting by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Your"find me a parking spot" app will be doomed as soon as it becomes popular. You'll be racing against everyone else looking for a parking space in the same area. Same as when Waze diverts people to a less congested area and it now becomes congested. Also, RFID tags won't tell you if there's a car in the spot - for that you would have to tag all cars.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re: The idiocy of the reporting by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      We had that happen here. The transit Corp wanted to make more money, so they convinced the city to let them charge for reserved parking - "to allow people to be sure that they could park." So the spots stayed empty and more people parked further away, increasing parking problems all over.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      The same problems apply to parking spaces. People don't want to book, they just want to park.

      This is the problem with most Internet of things ideas. They require booking and planning ahead. Imagine when we're all driving Google Cars. we aren't going to just hop in and it will know where we want to go. You'll program every day's trips on your calendar app, and any changes will need to be manually done. This might be great for obsessive compulsive's who have to have a rigidly set schedule, but I might have any of 5 different work destinations, and sometimes don't know until halfway to work. So I'll be spared the inconvenience of making a quick decision with reprogramming on the fly.

      Back to the refrigerator, I see the same problem. Instead of the terrible inconvenience of a notepad and pencil, we'll be able to program the thing, then I'll be damned if we won't see advertising when the refrigerator decides we're low on something. Then it'll be just fscking awesome when in a meeting with the director, and my phone alerts me to the milk situation being both low and 1 day away from the expiration date, but before that wants me to watch a commercial for Udderly Awesome Milk, in White, Chocolate or NEW! Hazlenut flavored!!!

      There are good uses of technology, Internet connected refrigerators are not.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by mlush · · Score: 1

      Do you have anything interesting to say?

    10. Re: The idiocy of the reporting by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Your"find me a parking spot" app will be doomed as soon as it becomes popular. You'll be racing against everyone else looking for a parking space in the same area.

      Sure - my off-the-cuff idea isn't very good, perhaps, but maybe with some work it could be. The point, though, is to start thinking about the things an IoT could actually be useful for, rather than everybody just saying "not good enough" about every silly idea that comes along. I am old enough to remember a time when the internet was widely regarded as "the biggest timewaster ever". It still is that, no doubt, but look where that's got it.

    11. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by jandersen · · Score: 1

      LED lightbulbs should last 25 years and at end of life would be running the equivalent of Windows 3.1

      Windows running a lightbulb? Yeah, that should work well. I imagine something slightly more appropriate, perhaps, with only the functionality that is relevant. And - what kind software support do you expect will be necessary for a lightbulb? Is it going to be a full media hub or something?

    12. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by sjames · · Score: 1

      And what if someone does take your booked space, okay they can be fined but you still can't park there until they move. What you want is an app that can tell you where free spaces are so you can save time by not driving around looking for one.

      No, what they really want is an app that can fling the offending car into a nearby dumpster so they can park in their reserved space.

    13. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by mlush · · Score: 1

      There are already internet enabled light bulbs and they have Security issues. Now in this case it appears that its just breaking into the bulbs mesh network and the manufacturer has released a fix, but most users won't apply it and what happens if they drop the product or just go out of business? The threat could easily more like the WiFi Kettle hack

    14. Re: The idiocy of the reporting by yuriklastalov · · Score: 1

      Nice solid 1980s tech, nothing to see here. No IoT required.

      Well there's your problem. Using 30 year old tech means none of the current tech companies can make any money off you.

    15. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The advertising angle will make any useful functionality too shitty to bother with. What are the chances that I'll be able to program it to order the milk for delivery from the cheapest source, rather than Samsung's limited choice of expensive "partners"? Of course they will optimize their delivery system so that the milk they deliver is the one with an expiry date two days hence, rather than the really fresh one that I'd pick up if I was in an actual shop.

      To some extent the convenience of something like an Amazon Dash button outweighs the additional cost from not finding the best deal, but you can guarantee they will slowly edge the price up and rely on people not switching to the very slightly newer and much cheaper "new" version.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The advertising angle will make any useful functionality too shitty to bother with. What are the chances that I'll be able to program it to order the milk for delivery from the cheapest source, rather than Samsung's limited choice of expensive "partners"?

      I'm certain that these wonderful devices will come with electronic rather than mechanical door latches.This will open a whole new world of consumer convenience. The door won't open until you watch an advertisement.

      Then I can just imagine Forbes.com getting involved.......... Then your Refrigerator sassing you - "We see that you have adblock enabled on your Refrigerator. Please disable it to allow opening the door and to continue accessing your food."

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:The idiocy of the reporting by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Only if you're interested in not sounding like a semi-literate.

  8. I know what it will happen... by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Your fridge cannot recognize the ice cream you installed. (R)eboot fridge or (M)elt the ice cream ?"

    "Your fridge is 99% full. You can make more space with the Fridge Cleanup Tool. Proceeed ? (Y/N)"

    and at the very end:

    "I am sorry Dave, you should not eat this."
    "Open the fridge door, HAL!"

    1. Re:I know what it will happen... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There are some high tech features in a fridge that I'd like, but only one requires any kind of network access. That is, the fridge should be smart about when it uses electricity, both to avoid peak time loads if possible and to save me money by using cheap power.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:I know what it will happen... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Where's my fridge? How about not running the compressor when it's well below freezing outside? How about venting the heat outside instead of into the kitchen when it's sweltering outside?

    3. Re:I know what it will happen... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      "Your fridge is 99% full. You can make more space with the Fridge Cleanup Tool. Proceeed ? (Y/N)"

      Shuddup and take my money. Actually take my girlfriend's money, she's the one with 5 year old leftovers that greet me when I open the fridge door. I had a complete conversation with it the other day.

  9. "Object Recognition Technology" by lobiusmoop · · Score: 1

    This would be much easier to do if all the items purchased in a supermarket had some kind of machine-readable label that linked to a database holding the product information and price...

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:"Object Recognition Technology" by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      This would be much easier to do if all the items purchased in a supermarket had some kind of machine-readable label that linked to a database holding the product information and price...

      You mean like a bar code that they could scan at the checkout?

    2. Re:"Object Recognition Technology" by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I think you just got the joke. The problem is though that not everything, specifically fresh fruit and veg have barcodes.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:"Object Recognition Technology" by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      And often the bar codes are on the bottom of the container (e.g., twelve packs of beer).

      Dumb idea. And when Microsoft stops security updates when your fridge is only nine years old?

      WTF are these idiots thinking?

  10. Re:"I'm sorry Dave I'm afraid I can't do that." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Refrigerator: "...just a moment...just a moment... I've just picked up a fault in the AE35 unit. It's going to go 100% failure within 72 hours."
    Dave: "It's still within operational limits right now?"
    Refrigerator: "Yes. And it will stay that way till it fails."
    Dave: "Would you say we have a reliable 72 hours till failure?"
    Refrigerator: "Yes. That's a completely reliable figure."

  11. You are missing the opportunity! by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    While the chances of them being able to SEE more than 15% of the contents of my fridge around, you know, all the other stuff in it, no matter how many cameras there are....

    I can see a great opportunity to livestream the constant evolution of internal lifeforms as a new reality TV show - their daily trials and tribulations, the constant ebb and flow of bacterial and viral battle.

    Just dont ever open the door - never ever open the door. I tried that once. ONCE.

  12. "Smart" appliances by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    More and more I get the feeling, to want smart appliances you gotta be rather dumb yourself.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. Re:No more double dipping! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Let's start at "how much do you pay me to use one of these".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Re:Already proven worthless by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    My 25 year old fridge is pretty simple. Mechanical thermostat + self defrost. In 25 years will today's IoT fridge still be relevant? Will it be like trying to get online with Windows 3.1?

    While I like technology, I subscribe to the KISS principle. The simplest solution is usually the best. In the case of home appliances, they usually seem to work better with basic mechanical timers than fancy electronics... let-alone foolishness like Internet connectivity.

  15. You mean .. like Samsung already has?? by johnlcallaway · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok .. they don't have image detection. But they do already have a fridge that has a camera to see the inside and a neat Android interface. My wife and I played with one at a local store recently and it was kinda neat. It had a nice whiteboard function to leave notes, supported streaming video and supposedly interfaced with the SmartTVs, although I'm not sure of the functionality. Since it appears to use Android, it was pretty intuitive to us. I don't think it would be to people who haven't used Android phones though.

    I don't know how useful image detection will be without several cameras in the back and side of each shelf. But it was interesting to be able to see very clearly what was inside without opening the door. I wonder if the energy cost of the TV screen and computer hardware will outweigh the savings of not opening the door as often or as long.

    It wasn't worth to me the extra $2K more a comparable fridge costs. It might be to people with more disposable income than I have.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:You mean .. like Samsung already has?? by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "I wonder if the energy cost of the TV screen and computer hardware will outweigh the savings of not opening the door as often or as long."

      I'm not sure, the heat capacity of air is pretty low.

      Assuming temp in the room is 25C and the air inside the fridge is at 4C we need to know the volume of air lost during each door opening, the difference in energy content of said air between 25C and 4C, and the efficiency of the refrigerator cooling circuit to remove that energy.

      The volume of a standard fridge is about 500L (or 20 cubic feet) and we should assume the fridge is 1/2 full of stuff other than air, so 250L is the working volume. Heat capacity: Cp for dry air is about 1kJ/kg.K, at STP the density of air is 1.275 kg/m3. To do this exactly we have to integrate down from 25C to 4C taking into account the change in air density and the change in heat capacity. But we don't really have to do that to solve this problem, just assume Cp is constant, take the STP density, and work out how many joules have to be removed from 250L of air to cool it from 25C to 4C. The answer I got is 21kJ.

      The final step is actually quite tricky as we don't know the energy efficiency of the refrigeration or the temperature difference between the refrigerator's hot side and the ambient temperature. A quick web search returns lots of values for total power consumption for refrigerators, but very little about the thermodynamic efficiency which is what we need to estimate the energy required to remove 21kJ from inside the refrigerator, plus we need to know the energy removal rate so we can convert this to power so we can compare to the power draw from the LCD and the computer.

      Unfortunately, while I was just getting going, I have to stop now. Perhaps someone wants to finish it?

    2. Re:You mean .. like Samsung already has?? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      That sounds neat and all, but I'm at a loss as to what use streaming video on a fridge would be. Our connecting to a tv, smart or otherwise.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:You mean .. like Samsung already has?? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      That sounds neat and all, but I'm at a loss as to what use streaming video on a fridge would be. Our connecting to a tv, smart or otherwise.

      You can bet that if Kim Cardassian's Refrigerator is streaming video from inside, some tools will be watching it. Probably become a new reality series.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    4. Re:You mean .. like Samsung already has?? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I decided to not worry much about the energy loss when opening the door : wouldn't refreshing the air a bit be healthy, anyway?
      Is there an amount of cycling the air recommended to fend off odors and unwanted life? Do high end fridges cycle the air on their own?

  16. Re:Stupidest idea ever... by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    No, the script kiddie noticed that the fridge contents weren't changing after 2-3 days and sold the list of all vacant houses in the area to the local gang. The outcome could be a lot worse than just moldy milk.

  17. Re:Already proven worthless by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    If you live in a freezing climate then if it's a fridge-freezer then you need dual-thermostats, but otherwise, KISS is exactly the right approach.

  18. Why do they use Windows in refrigerators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because it always freezes.

  19. Re:Already proven worthless by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Usually with the dual thermostats one of them is just a damper controlling how much air gets blown into the fridge from the freezer.

  20. Internal cameras by NetAlien · · Score: 1

    will finally solve the mystery of the light -- it's ON in order to see what's inside...

  21. BCoD by vittal · · Score: 1

    I foresee the Blue Cheese of Death.

  22. Coupons will appear on the screen by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    What brands do you use? Microsoft will feed you coupons, readable with your smartphone, or sent directly to your smartphone, to save you money on whatever companies overpriced products are paying them to send you ads with coupons. If you think a "smart" fridge is for your benefit, think again.

    1. Re:Coupons will appear on the screen by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      No, nobody will buy these so Microsoft will have to pay you to use the product along with their "focused advertising"

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  23. Why? by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

    Because we're not smart enough to keep track of what we have in our own fridge. What a waste.

    --
    linquendum tondere
  24. Re:Already proven worthless by NotAPK · · Score: 1

    These comments only apply to dual fridge-freezer units, which are quite common:

    My understanding is that two actual thermostats are required since the freezer needs to be at -20C and the fridge at 4C. If the ambient temperature goes between -20C and 4C then a single thermostat (typically located in the fridge) turns off and the compressor stops. But the freezer will now defrost, especially so if the ambient temperature is floating around 0C. Worst case would be weeks of temperatures between -5C and 0C where the feezer contents would freeze and thaw and freeze and thaw in random ways, and even worse, upon inspection in the spring time the food may appear safe and completely frozen: but potentially deadly.

    The second thermostat ensures the compressor keeps driving to keep the freezer section cold. Of course this also requires two coolant circuits, or a way to throttle the flow of coolant between the fridge and freezer, all of which adds cost, which is why it's rarely done properly.

    You're right then: the better approach is to have the thermostat on the freezer side and have the second thermostat control a damper. Damn...need more coffee :)

  25. For how long will it work? by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    LG has shown a Windows 10 fridge, running on a low end x86 PC. Your Samsung fridge seems a lot of fun and niceties from the read while I'm sure most people will turn away from the Metro apps and Windows store, if only instinctively. But I really hate to be the guy that breaks the fun :), so as to point out the Android fridge's near term future is dubious, whereas the Windows fridge is promised security updates till 2025, subject to extension if an OS upgrade occurs or if MS has another moment of "shit, if we drop off support right now there will be 400 millions more Internet zombies so let's extend this OS version for three years".

    Hopefully we may end up getting "long term Android". Perhaps using Android on straight x86 PC hardware? nvidia ARM hardware may end up with some long term support too. Will another SoC vendor follow suit? There is no hard technical reason to drop driver support etc. after a couple years. Looking forward for LESS innovation :)

  26. Re:spolier alert below by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Funny

    So would a system freeze be seen as a positive feature ?

  27. ... and selling the data acquired to marketers... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    This is just another egregious data harvesting attempt by Microsoft. Not being satisfied with scooping up data from our computers, Microsoft is now looking to look inside our appliances to see what we eat, what clothes we wash, etc.
    .

  28. Re:No by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    In China students are fined for 'excessive' toilet flushing, they must use an electronic pass every time that they go to the toilet.

  29. Stop conflating "smart" with shit like this by DrXym · · Score: 1
    So-called "smart" TVs push ads, track usage and after a few years start to go bitrotten as apps and services become discontinued. So-called "smart" watches are tied to proprietary services, can't last more than a few days on a charge and are obsolete in a few years. A "smart" fridge will be no different in this regard - you'll pay a premium for something that spies on you, will discontinue service after a few years and then display a bunch of error messages.

    Meanwhile their supposedly dumb counterparts carry on working. A genuinely smart device would be one which provides value independent of some ephemeral service in the cloud and it would do so without compromising your privacy.

  30. ... and no mention of security by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Typical Microsoft --- features first, security as an afterthought.

  31. Definition of oxymoron by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Microsoft smart.

  32. "Using the deep learning algorithms ..." by ve3oat · · Score: 1

    I suppose their intent is that this fridge will be able to manage supplies and demands the same way that my mother so effortlessly and effectively managed our ice box and pantry in our very dynamic household when I was a kid. She had learned her stuff from my grandmother and added a few tricks and neat solutions to the repertoire, doing all of it everyday in her head and without blinking an eyelash in the face of last-minute changes in the number of chairs around the table and last-minute confessions to the "Who ate all the ..." question. And today we need a computer to do this? What a waste of resources!

  33. Ancient Question Solved ! by kjhambrick · · Score: 1

    I suppose this means that the answer to the ancient Question:: Does the light in the 'fridge really go out when I close the door is: NO :)

  34. Re:"I'm sorry Dave I'm afraid I can't do that." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fridge: "I'm sorry Dave, the ObamaCare 2.0 Single Payer daemon has detected whole milk."
    Dave: "Yeah so what."
    Fridge: "Your household is now ineligible for health benefits per 66 U.S.C. 192."
    Dave: "I need my statins. My daughter needs cancer surgery!"
    Fridge: "I'm afraid the government will not allow that."

  35. Again with the Internet fridge by xarragon · · Score: 1

    What is this, the third time someone tries this? Last time we used to joke about Internet-connected toasters and fridges was around late 90s and the dotcom boom? Then again in the mid-2000s?

    While I do believe that tracking your food intake can be beneficial, I am not sure this particular implementation will be for the benefit of the consumer. Regardless, computer vision seems a bit overkill for this. A smartphone app with barcode reader and a small scale should be enough, the trick is getting it streamlined.

  36. Windows Refrigerator Features by DougReed · · Score: 1

    1. It will crash and your food will spoil.
    2. You will get calls requesting your SSN and bank details from people with Indian and Russian accents saying they are from Microsoft support and you have a virus.
    3. You will need to double click on the door handle to open it.
    4. You will have to pay $300 a year to subscribe to fresh food.
    5. The camera will send pictures of you in your underwear at 2 AM to Microsoft for quality improvement.
    6. You will need to subscribe to virus protection for your refrigerator. ... I can't wait!

  37. BSOD by lophophore · · Score: 1

    Now you won't only see the blue screen of death on ATM machines and airport display boards, you can see it on your own 'fridge. And there will be a blue film of death on all your rotting vegetables. #badidea

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  38. I wonder if it qualifies for a Energy Star rating by Dorianny · · Score: 1

    They mounted a very large tablet on a Refrigarator. The really crazy part is that because of "innovative features " like ice dispensers and water chillers the 1940's refrigerators were actually more energy efficent then the modern ones. Putting a power hungry giant screen on it is one way to continue driving down energy efficency

  39. Re:Already proven worthless by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

    Most residential fridges are rated for ambient temperatures between 10C - 32C. The first issue is the control issue you mention, the second is the efficiency of the refrigeration cycle, and possible lubrication issues. Most solve this issue by installing their fridge inside a climate controlled living area (like a kitchen). There are some "garage kits" for fridges that are a heater to trick the thermostat in the fridge section. You may also need a heater to keep the compressor and refrigerant warm (and gaseous).

    My current fridge-freezer only has one thermostat, with no way of separately controlling the freezer. I live in Canada where it gets to -25C outside, but my kitchen doesn't go below 15C, and I haven't had any problems with stuff thawing in the freezer. Some dampers may be thermostatically controlled, some may just be a simple damper.

  40. IDIOT == Insecurely Designed Internet Of Things by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    IDIOT == Insecurely Designed Internet Of Things

    Spread the meme.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  41. Cortana for the IoT? by ThatOneSDGuy · · Score: 1

    This seems as useful for refrigerators as Cortana is for a PC, which is to say,"Not at all." there is no description of what the features might do for the consumer, and the only real benefits listed above are for advertisers, much like Cortana. when I purchase one of these things, will I be required to pay for the bandwidth it uses? What about my IoT range, Washer,Dryer, hot water heater and microwave? What do I get? A shopping list with dry spices, fabric softener, dryer sheets and an add for a water softener which can tell me to buy salt? Unless some appliance maker can show me how I do better because something is connected, and enough better that I am compensated for the bandwidth I pay for, I will never buy a connected appliance.( I believe unconnected appliances will still be produced and sold in underdeveloped countries for the foreseeable future.)