Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Leaks Michelle Obama's Passport (nypost.com)

The hacker who leaked Colin Powell's private email account last week has struck again. This time they have hacked a low-level White House staffer and released a picture of Michelle Obama's passport, along with detailed schedules for top U.S. officials and private email messages. New York Post reports: The information has been posted online by the group DC Leaks. The White House staffer -- who also apparently does advance work for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign -- is named Ian Mellul. The released documents include a PowerPoint outline of Vice President Joe Biden's recent Cleveland trip, showing his planned route, where he'll meet with individuals and other sensitive information, according to the Daily Mail. In an email to The Post, the hacker writes, "The leaked files show the security level of our government. If terrorists hack emails of White House Office staff and get such sensitive information we will see the fall of our country." The hacker adds, "We hope you will tell the people about this criminal negligence of White House Office staffers."

122 comments

  1. Totally. by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

    If terrorists hack emails of White House Office staff and get such sensitive information we will see the fall of our country."

    Yeah, I totally believe you're an American. Totally. Look, this is my not-being-sarcastic face.

    --
    "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
    1. Re:Totally. by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the contrary?

    2. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese are buying shit on credit. They get credit from the true evil in this world. The old evil.

    3. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nyalarthotep?

    4. Re:Totally. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I assumed they must be Chinese. Who else could claim ownership of the US "our country"?

      Wait, so you don't consider it to be your country? Maybe that is why your country is so screwed up if you do not think of yourself as having "ownership" of it. You think the problems are for someone else to solve.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    5. Re:Totally. by chispito · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the contrary?

      Simple: risk vs reward. Why release such trivial and mundane information unless you're basically immune to repercussions?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    6. Re:Totally. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Who else could claim ownership of the US "our country"?

      Mexico. Next question?

    7. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so you don't consider it to be your country?

      No.

      Maybe that is why your country is so screwed up if you do not think of yourself as having "ownership" of it.

      Which country are you talking about now?

    8. Re:Totally. by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well considering that only Americans could be dumb enough to think this kind of low level data is "such sensitive information"

      Apparently, you don't understand anything about the physical security of dignitaries and top officials.

      Travel plans, routes, and details about the stops of heads of state are always considered highly sensitive security information. This country is full of extremely stupid, gullible, and ridiculously-overarmed people, and a small subset of whom probably thinks it would be a good thing to bring harm to the First Lady. The Secret Service plans the routes, the stops, provides decoy vehicles, and secures each of those locations to an incredible degree; but no amount of effort can secure every location against a patient, well-camouflaged, entrenched sniper. Uncertainty in the travel routes is one of the best ways to keep the lone wolves from being able to plant themselves along the route.

      So yes, it is highly sensitive information.

      --
      John
    9. Re:Totally. by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Always be praised.

    10. Re: Totally. by Pop69 · · Score: 2

      Britain, France, the actual natives that were there before the European invasion.

    11. Re:Totally. by Immerman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ego and bragging rights? Everyone knows the leet haxxors get all the babes...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Secret Service plans the routes, the stops, provides decoy vehicles, and secures each of those locations to an incredible degree [...]

      At least for the transportation component, why do they do static routes? Why not do like the British do and have it completely dynamic and basically made up as you go along:

      * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmZ7hhREZhI

      Have a few decoys, but it seems much more elegant than fencing off large parts of city streets.

    13. Re:Totally. by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Well considering that only Americans could be dumb enough to think this kind of low level data is "such sensitive information"

      Apparently, you don't understand anything about the physical security of dignitaries and top officials.

      Travel plans, routes, and details about the stops of heads of state are always considered highly sensitive security information.

      I'm sure it's considered highly sensitive by the people whose job it is to make sure as many things fall under their scope of work as possible, but is it really? I mean this has now been leaked and what is the impact? No injuries or deaths, nothing. Maybe we shouldn't just believe these things are special because the people who are paid to look after special things say they are.

    14. Re: Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chaos that crawls up to you with a smi le.

    15. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it's considered highly sensitive by the people whose job it is to make sure as many things fall under their scope of work as possible, but is it really? I mean this has now been leaked and what is the impact? No injuries or deaths, nothing. Maybe we shouldn't just believe these things are special because the people who are paid to look after special things say they are.

      Information about where someone was is not nearly as important as to where they are going to be. If information was released, say to a little dark corner of the internet with the truly rabid racists, that for some reason doesn't get immediately noticed by the authorities, then, well, it becomes possible for something unthinkable to occur.

      Security at this level must be taken very seriously. This is much more true today than even a few years ago. Two factor authentication should probably be required for anything with that kind of information, as well as end to end encryption. Keeping all the information inside a semi isolated firewall helps as well, but should not be the only line of defense.

      Defense in depth is not just a slogan, but a requirement at this level these days. Add as many serious layers of security as you can, as long as they don't seriously impact the ability to do your job.

      Let's face it. This election has a nation state attempting to change the outcome. Any security less than the best is not remotely enough, nor is that ever likely to change. Information that does not need retained should be deleted. Information that does not need to be retained online should be pulled offline, or moved to systems in closed areas.

      In fact. Give the NSA a standing order to attempt to hack people and entities that could be used to influence the election. If they succeed, fix it, until they don't.

    16. Re:Totally. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the contrary?

      The fact that he thinks making it slightly easier to assassinate Joe Biden will bring down the country.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    17. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, it is very sensitive information. As noted above, you clearly have no clue about the security of high-profile political figures. I'd wager you have nary a clue about the real world in general.

      Maybe you shouldn't believe what you make up in your head out of ignorance.

    18. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got 72 babes myself!

    19. Re:Totally. by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      In short it's a trade off between your resources and the supposed resources of the attacker. Even though SO14 escorts "heads of state" they don't escort the US first lady, etc. they bring their own apparatus.

      So, since SO14/Britain couldn't do what the US does, because it would be too disruptive and cost too much given the level of threat and resources, the US secret service can. They have both a higher threat to deal with, and the resource to do so.

      It's the same as in the military. If you just want to know what's going on, sneaking a four man recon patrol in, using maximum stealth is the way to go. However, if you expect the enemy to be too thick on the ground for that (problem with small patrols is that they go missing all the time, and then what?), an armoured reconnaissance battalion is the way to go. So either go very small, or sufficiently large. If you can't cordon off the area and man the whole route, then go small and stealthy, trying not to give away anything. If you can, then you go whole hog, complete with barriers and "x" number of officers per yard of road travelled.

      This of course also depends on your objective. If you check the SO14 film, it's a couple of cars. The presidential motorcade OTOH isn't that far off in size from an armoured reconnaissance battalion (well, company at least), so they have to behave like one. You couldn't bring that kind of mass of vehicles and people through on a contingency basis anyway, all traffic would grind to a halt, and the smallest fender bender ahead of you would make you a static target. So, you're basically forced to go the whole nine yards anyway, and hence you have to do it properly.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    20. Re: Totally. by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      So it would be fair and square to invade the US now, exterminate 90% of the population and enslave the rest?

    21. Re:Totally. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And I'm equally sure that you're quite possibly a complete moron and that you're very definitely someone who's never, ever had to deal with actual security issues for important visitors of any sort, much less for heads of state and their families.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    22. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such hackers (i.e. Lulzsec) are trivial to track down and catch over a few months though because they're their own worst enemy - their arrogance gets them caught.

      Honestly, part of me thinks there's a genuine cyber war going on between the US and Russia right now with all these pro-Trump hacks given that Trump is Putin's man in America.

      What's the bet the Yahoo attack was a Russian action to hit an American company hard and the Yandex attack was retribution by the US?

      A lot of these attacks aren't just the sort of plain old SQL injection attack that the script kiddies use, they're spear phishing attacks and such that require detailed knowledge of targets and calculation of weak links. This isn't new of course, people like Kevin Mitnick did exactly this, but that was prior to 9/11 and the world of CCTV surveillance.

      I don't buy the idea that anyone with the ability, energy, and will to do this sort of research is just some script kiddie out to make up for the fact he was bullied at school by pretending he matters. It fits a pattern of repeated attacks against the Democratic campaign, and it's not as though the Trump campaign has a monopoly on sophisticated computer security specialists - on the contrary, Trump supporters are statistically much more poorly educated, I don't mean that as an insult to them but as a statement of fact - there's just something that doesn't make sense about the persistence of attacks against the Democrats campaign and the complete lack against Trump's campaign.

      Trump's links to Russia and praise of Putin are well documented, hacking support for Trump that has been linked to Russia is well documented. This just seems to fit part of an ongoing pattern more so than a script kiddie out for glory. This all seems to fit the pattern of Putin's goal of trying to disrupt the US elections, it fits Putin's love of maskirovka, and it fits in as justified by Russia's well voiced perception that this is what the West does to Russia during it's elections. It fits in with the sort of revenge Putin and co would claim is justified in light of it's belief that the oil price crashed caused by US fracking is an attempt to topple him.

      This really does seem like it's Putin's attempt to neuter the one thing standing in the way of his ambitions to make Russia a great global player again. Really, the only thing stopping him doing to Estonia, Latvia et. al. what he's done to Ukraine is precisely US support and if Trump gets in he's already made it clear that he would pull out of defending these nations against Putin.

    23. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The awkward English, for starters.

    24. Re: Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So it would be fair and square to invade the US now, exterminate 90% of the population and enslave the rest?"

      I'd really love to see someone try that by conventional military means and with clear intentions. Even if it was the U.S. government.

      If you're talking about doing it over the course of many generations, it's already happening.

    25. Re:Totally. by bigpat · · Score: 1

      If terrorists hack emails of White House Office staff and get such sensitive information we will see the fall of our country."

      Yeah, I totally believe you're an American. Totally. Look, this is my not-being-sarcastic face.

      Regardless, our national security is built on the stronger foundation of common purpose of Liberty and democracy and not merely the ability of our government officials to keep secrets from us and our enemies.

      Sure there are some things that should be secret to keep people safer and which allows our government and military to operate without adversaries knowing their every move. But our national security must be stronger than secrets.

    26. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While agreed that security of heads of state (or the FL) should always be taken seriously, I seriously doubt any "rabid racists" are actually looking to off Michell Obama; we've seen no evidence of any plans or serious calls to violence during this administration, just the usual empty rhetoric. If you want to see actual, dangerous racism in action, look at Charlotte, NC.

    27. Re:Totally. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      his country is full of extremely stupid, gullible, and ridiculously-overarmed people, and a small subset of whom probably thinks it would be a good thing to bring harm to the First Lady.

      Meanwhile, Jefferson often complained about the never-ending parade of people who walked into his office at all hours of the day to complain.

      But he didn't have a Department of Education. Or bombing campaigns in sixteen countries (the Barbary Pirates not withstanding).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    28. Re:Totally. by Gussington · · Score: 1

      And I'm equally sure that you're quite possibly a complete moron and that you're very definitely someone who's never, ever had to deal with actual security issues for important visitors of any sort, much less for heads of state and their families.

      Oh dear, you couldn't fallen into that any deeper. I have Govt Security Clearance and actually worked on some security related things for the G20 involving exactly that.
      But keep believing whatever it is makes you feel better about your beliefs...

  2. Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Only 5 years? No middle name? Seems suspicious.

    1. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diplomatic passports are valid for five years.

    2. Re:Expry date by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Only 5 years? No middle name? Seems suspicious.

      I don't have a middle name. What's suspicious about that?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know who else doesn't have a middle name? Al Qaeda.

    4. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the commie! Hey everybody, TechyImmigrant has no middle name. Who wants to organize the pitchfork party?

    5. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "Expry" did you mean the English word "Expiration"? That's a really weird slip.

    6. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A United Kingdom passport has "Date of Expiry:", so this is likely a British person mis-typing "expiry". Similarly the UK has had a "Department of Transport" instead of the US-style "Department of Transportation". It all frees up extra letters that we can then trade for "u"'s in color, honor, etc.

    7. Re:Expry date by jmcharry · · Score: 1

      That is a type P passport, not a diplomatic or official passport. It is probably a fake.

    8. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The P stands for "Passport", not what type of passport it is.

    9. Re:Expry date by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't have a middle name. What's suspicious about that?

      Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama does have a middle name. That's why it's suspicious.

    10. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ex passport service employee here: Type P=Passport, ID=Identity Document, LP=UN laissez-passer, PT=Travel document (issued under United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951 and its Protocol of 1967)

      It's normal for all passports (including service/special and diplo) to bear the TYPE=P, since well, it's a passport!

    11. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would she have a diplomatic passport? She doesn't hold an office, she's just married to a guy who does.

    12. Re:Expry date by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I don't have a middle name. What's suspicious about that?

      Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama does have a middle name. That's why it's suspicious.

      Fair enough.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  3. In the end by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    I suppose all of these stupid hacks make us all more security conscious. That's good.... right?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:In the end by rlp · · Score: 2

      You're assuming the learning curve is positive ...

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
  4. She is Muslim from Kenya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

    1. Re:She is Muslim from Kenya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's hot.

  5. Terrorists win by XparXnoiaX · · Score: 2

    This is how it should be. Organizations need to embarrassed and publicly shamed for having lousy security. Otherwise they will never fix it (see also: linkedin, yahoo, verizon, etc). If they don't fix their security, terrorists win.

    --
    Irresponsible disclosure is responsible
    1. Re:Terrorists win by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Sony has been embarrassed several times, so have those other organizations. There's no evidence they've fixed anything in response, because nothing really happens to them. Only thing that's changed recently is that they've taken a page right out of HBO's comedy VEEP and now blame every one of their fuck ups on the Chinese/Russian/North Korean governments.

  6. Smile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hold on, why is she allowed to smile on her passport? This is bullshit

  7. If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know the election was hacked by the Soviets.

    1. Re:If Trump wins... by OzPeter · · Score: 0

      The niggers were not looting with GB was president.

      I'd like to introduce you to Rodney King. He lived in a place called Los Angeles at the time GB was president.

      Oh, what's that? You're so young that you didn't know that there have been two presidents named GB?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I remember Rodney King. I lived 2 hours away in San Bernardino. I remember it well. I was 23 at the time.

    3. Re:If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All of these lootings and BLM assclowns wouldn't be doing this if a white Republican were in office. Were I in charge, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. OUt come the snarling 120 lb German Shepherds. Let's see how quickly these dumb niggers learn not to loot.

      Some riots during the GWB presidency:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unrest_in_the_United_States#2000s

      Cincinnati riots of 2001
      Benton Harbor riots (see 2003)
      Miami FTAA Protests
      2004 American League Championship Series (wow sports riots!)
      Civil disturbances and military action in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
      2005 Toledo riot (Neo-Nazi's!)
      San Bernardino punk riot (more Neo-Nazis!)
      2007 MacArthur Park rallies (Go police riot!)

      Huzzah, I guess you aren't on top of affairs, Bull Connor Jr.

    4. Re:If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have no excuse for your ignorance.

    5. Re:If Trump wins... by r1348 · · Score: 1

      We are really sorry for your virility issues.

    6. Re:If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feed the troll.

    7. Re:If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All of these lootings and BLM assclowns wouldn't be doing this if a white Republican were in office. Were I in charge, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. OUt come the snarling 120 lb German Shepherds. Let's see how quickly these dumb niggers learn not to loot.

      Some riots during the GWB presidency:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unrest_in_the_United_States#2000s

      Cincinnati riots of 2001
      Benton Harbor riots (see 2003)
      Miami FTAA Protests
      2004 American League Championship Series (wow sports riots!)
      Civil disturbances and military action in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
      2005 Toledo riot (Neo-Nazi's!)
      San Bernardino punk riot (more Neo-Nazis!)
      2007 MacArthur Park rallies (Go police riot!)

      Huzzah, I guess you aren't on top of affairs, Bull Connor Jr.

      Yeah, but at least while Bush was President we didn't have any damn terrorists.

      Aside from 9/11. Or the smaller follow up. LAX shootup too. Which is why we need to focus on them A-rabs and profile more. Profiling has never failed to turn up a bad A-rab and they are aLWAYS the bad guys.

      Except for the anthrax letters, or the first couple 'pox issues too. Oh, and that sniper, he turned out to be black. And not alone. But otherwise, ITS ALWAYS LONE WOLF ARABS and totally Obummer's fault!

  8. How do I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do I add freon to my cpu cooler? It runs hotter now than before.

  9. More like grudge attack against staffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have the "hacker" come forward and prove they accessed files remotely through the internet. Otherwise this could be an angry-ex grudge attack.

  10. What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieBros by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >> The White House staffer -- who also apparently does advance work for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign -- is named Ian Mellul.

    The one thing the dox's have in common is that they show the Democratic party trying to have a democracy/debate-free transition of power from Obama to Clinton. And this dual-employed "staffer" would seem to fit the profile.

    The group most pissed about the attempted coronation has been Bernie supporters, i.e., anyone leaning left and under 45. That also happens to be most of the IT security gurus I know. (The rest tend to be intelligent and right-leaning and have therefore tuned out both remaining candidates.) So...why are people trying to say "the Russians" when it seems more likely that the hackers are Bernie supporters ticked off that the Democrats kneecapped the only viable progressive in a generation?

  11. 'Murica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The backdrop picture in the passport is hilarious.

  12. well timed 'hacks'... by s1d3track3D · · Score: 0

    What a total disaster, I sure wish there was a way to make our country great again....

  13. NY Post by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    It's not real.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by SirSlud · · Score: 3

    I like the way you make points. You just say stuff, and it sounds right to you, so it must be a good theory. Because you're smart, and you see the world the way it is.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  15. Re:now that would be ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Illinois, birther.

  16. reuse old computers? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    This along with the huge Yahoo email hack, maybe repurpose IBM-360s? I don't think those beasts were ever hacked. Yeah, just being sarcastic as only way for me to vent about all these hacks.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:reuse old computers? by number6x · · Score: 1

      Oh, they were hacked. It's just that the hackers didn't get EBCDIC and kept trying to 'unencrypt' the files they got into ASCII.

    2. Re:reuse old computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, they were hacked. It's just that the hackers didn't get EBCDIC and kept trying to 'unencrypt' the files they got into ASCII.

      Pffft, I can convert EBCDIC on my Mac, it's not THAT obscure.
      dd if=in of=out conv=ascii

  17. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by hey! · · Score: 2

    Sorry, it was the White House that made Cheddar Mussolini the Republican nominee?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  18. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Plausible Denial is of course to blame it on the Russkies.

    In reality it a a service so secret it does not have an official member list. They use a communication system which NSA does not even know it exists. They like to hide their men in candybar makers and at caterpillar.

    They use highly covert means to connect to the internet. Sometimes they work as sysadmins. Then they expose while concurrently spreading the ideas the Russkies did it.

    Let's call the service PATRIOTS.

  19. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is Al CIA Qaeda.

    1. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Betty when you call me, you can call me Al.

  20. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you a fucking idiot? Any party is going to want a smooth transition between offices. Literally every party does this, ever, because why would you fire all your staffers and hire new ones when you already have the talent working for you? Bernie would have inherited Obama's staff too.

  21. Re:now that would be ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's also no Hawaii in Illinois. GP is a fucking twit, no surprise.

  22. Wow by s.petry · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You start okay, because yeah many of us are fed up with a political class running ram-shod over the rest of us so that they can work toward their global domination agenda. Obama's UN speech made it clear that he does not care as much about sovereignty as he does about that agenda. The "We" in his speech that need to make sacrifices to support that end do not include him and the political class who has been wiping their ass with the US Constitution for decades. You in Europe are not much better off, but in fairness we have lost much more liberty because we had more.

    Then, you go off to the deep end. Most intellectuals working in security are for personal Liberty, which is the exact opposite of Sanders. That leaves us with Trump as the only hope, which does not have great odds but it's better than a very well known liar. Sanders attracted crusaders who are not well educated in history, not the students of history. Sanders was shat upon, but that was in the cards when he was chosen to run against her. He got a decent retirement plan for his efforts, he's not too worried. People who followed him on the other hand found the system to be corrupt and many have dropped out. Study Communist transformation, and you will see that demoralizing the populace is requirement in large doses. This crap was well known 50 years ago and published by defecting KGB agents.

    Why do people say "Russians"? That is a multi-part answer. The easiest is that it takes people's eyes away from the wrong doing you started with. Will this double dipping person face any penalty for shafting tax payers? Will the people who employed her? Obama is running around on Tax payer dollars for Hillary fundraisers and campaign purposes. But hey, look at those stinky Russians.

    I'll grant you that the game is complex, but it's not "that" complex if you focus on the team playing. They own the media and own most politicians, and it's a club that you can't join.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem like the worst Slashdot stereotype, completely retarded for personal freedom and yet you seem to prefer the party that only believes in personal freedom for corporations.

    2. Re:Wow by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Remind me, which of the two major political parties supports giving away ICANN? Which of the two won't shut the fuck up about "hate speech" when they encounter someone they disagree with? Who's supporters are going on about inane issues such as "Air conditioning is sexist" and "Because you're X, you can't talk about Y" (X being sexual orientation or skin color).

      Both parties are completely fucked, but I would easily trust the right to preserve freedom of speech over the left.

    3. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you'd be dumb, because the right insists the Left should shut up all the time, that feelings don't mattet, only THEIR logic, that they have THE FACTS and that the liberal media is corrupting our youth which is why we need to stop letting anti-American Hollywood make movies and only have decent works like American Sniper and no anti-white black Annies or gay Sulus or witchcraft using Harry Potters.

      But wait, they insist they're the only ones who care about freedom and liberty too, so....

      Perhaps you don't have the whole story.

  23. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, it was the White House that made Cheddar Mussolini the Republican nominee?

    xxJonBoyxxx's use of "coronation" means he's been listening to way too much talk radio. So, yes, he probably does believe Hillary is behind the selection of such a poor Republican candidate.

  24. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know who the hell did it. He got a total of four votes in my precinct caucus.

  25. Abandon all hope ye who enter here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The comments here are some of the most retarded and toxic that I've ever seen on slashdot.

  26. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> The White House staffer -- who also apparently does advance work for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign -- is named Ian Mellul.

    The one thing the dox's have in common is that they show the Democratic party trying to have a democracy/debate-free transition of power from Obama to Clinton. And this dual-employed "staffer" would seem to fit the profile.

    The group most pissed about the attempted coronation has been Bernie supporters, i.e., anyone leaning left and under 45. That also happens to be most of the IT security gurus I know. (The rest tend to be intelligent and right-leaning and have therefore tuned out both remaining candidates.) So...why are people trying to say "the Russians" when it seems more likely that the hackers are Bernie supporters ticked off that the Democrats kneecapped the only viable progressive in a generation?

    Can you please provide evidence that this dual-hat person shows malicious intent? I would expect at least a couple of people to be interfacing with both the Clinton campaign as well as the Trump campaign. If either of them wins, they will need to start operating as the POTUS within 2-ish months, and that's a very short time for a transition. (Remember the big news about how Trump would start having classified intelligence briefings back after the Republican convention?)

    I'll admit it sounds bad, and I'm very prepared to believe that this does show conspiratorial leanings. However, speaking for myself, I would want more than just an observation which can easily be explained by innocent circumstances.

  27. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If we're going to just make shit up with no evidence, why not say it was aliens?

  28. But not Trump's Taxes? by tekrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    How is it that we can have everything on the Democrats hacked, *everything*, but not one little thing comes out from the RNC? I find that highly suspicious.

    Perhaps the RNC is paying someone or is colluding with the Soviets to hack the election.

    If only Anonymous could obtain Trump's taxes to even the score a bit...

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:But not Trump's Taxes? by KeensMustard · · Score: 2
      What would be the point?

      If they aren't embarrassed by the things Trump says and does, and by the fact that they had no-one, not one person, in the ranks of the party that they thought was better qualified to lead the party and the country then Donald Trump, they surely wouldn't be embarrassed by the release of schedules or private emails.

      How can the private things be MORE embarrassing then the dirty laundry of Donald's mouth? That just boggles the mind.

      Every few days we hear of another republican disowning him and his bizzarro worldview. What could be said that's more embarrassing?

    2. Re:But not Trump's Taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the rnc appears to be at least slightly more competent and didn't surround themselves by clueless party line worshipers.

  29. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, you probably live in an old-school Republic precinct. The kind of town where folks at they Y thoughtfully leave their back issues of Rich Protestant Golfer magazine behind so others will have something to read on the treadmill. The kind of place where you serve your guests drinks in the living room, not on the kitchen table. Good people, but sometimes a little obtuse about how the other 80% live.

    Trump locked down the non-traditionals, and the rest of the Republicans were splitting the traditional R vote a dozen ways. Add to that primary rules that were written to favor early front runners. Those rules worked like a charm: instead of the agony of prolonged uncertainty the party suffered the agony of premature certainty.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  30. Maybe Trump didn't choose the lowest bidder for IT by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Maybe Trump's company didn't use the lowest bidder on all of their IT projects.

  31. Maybe Russian, maybe Bernie. Let's say communists by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Maybe it was Russians, maybe it was Bernians. Since we don't know which, let's use a term which includes both - communists.

  32. Re:Maybe Trump didn't choose the lowest bidder for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody needs to hack the RNC to make Trump look like a poor choice for president, he does that every time he talks without a script.

  33. It's a FAKE! by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    SORRY but this is a FAKE! Look at the issue and expiration dates.... It shows it's only good for 5 years. REAL U.S. Adult passports are good for 10 years!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:It's a FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably a diplomatic passport, which is usually good for 5 years.

    2. Re:It's a FAKE! by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Does that apply to special issuance passports for official state department travel/business or other "special" passports?

      Obama was elected in 2008 so the family getting official business passports in December 2008 isn't far fetched. Add 5 years puts it in 2013 when it gets reissued. Not saying that is what happened, but it'd be plausible.

    3. Re:It's a FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you have all the answers. So tell me bro, why is her face so big? Because she's a special passport and gets to have her head fill the entire frame without ample whitespace around the image?

      Keep protecting the status quo

  34. Don't forget the FBI's "intelligent conversation" by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 1

    The head of the FBI has stated that this year they "are gathering the data" for an "intelligent conversation" next year about "encryption". I think this type of story should be catalogued, indexed, made available for that conversation. Add to that the just revealed 500 Million account hack at Yahoo. Encrypted files would have made these vacuum cleaner jobs a bit harder ...cm

  35. credit from the true evil: Capital One? by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > They get credit from the true evil in this world

    They a Capital One card?

  36. IBM 360s were used by hackers. I did it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM 360s were used by hackers. I did it.

    Had a job programming IBM360s for the Govt. Did some amazing things on those and hacked a crap-load of code together for them.

    You've seen my work, I'm positive. Ever see a space shuttle launch or land? http://history.nasa.gov/comput... - shuttle GN&C computers were modified IBM 360s.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... - jump to 1 min into the video and be amazed at how perfect that landing is. That's my code dude. After maingear touchdown, the astronauts don't really control the elevons.

  37. Look at that smile by fonitrus · · Score: 1

    That is a nice smile. She must have some special privileges to be able to smile on passport photo. Unlike us mere mortals that are forever grumpy looking on our photos.

    1. Re:Look at that smile by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Wookiees smile a lot?

    2. Re:Look at that smile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're allowed to smile now.

  38. Information wants to be free by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    What's the problem?

    1. Re:Information wants to be free by Gussington · · Score: 1

      There is no problem. But that doesn't stop the people in the business of selling controversy making it one.
      Our role as readers is to learn what is noise and ignore it.

  39. There is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A modern equivalent of the Boston Tea Party. Only instead of throwing tea into the bay we throw the politicians from DC into it!

    I am less sure what you should do if they successfully swim back to shore, or worse yet: float. Some of them are big enough to float. Should you harpoon them like a whale, or introduce some sharks or orcas?

  40. Yeah, the only one who polled losing to Clinton by raymorris · · Score: 1

    True. When there were four or five candidates vying for the Republican nomination, all beat Clinton in head-to-head polling, except Trump. The primary voters chose the candidate who may be worse than Clinton.

    I sure would like to see a good president again. I don't even care too much whether it's a good Democrat or a good Republican. Kennedy or Reagan, either would be a huge improvement over this year's choices and the last few presidents. For younger people, the best president of their lifetime is a guy who simply didn't do much, gpod or bad. A president who spent most of his time chasing women and trying to cover up his womanizing. Sad.

  41. Re:now that would be ironic. by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

    Michelle Obama was born in Umbwandanabe, Kenya, Illinois, Hawaii?

  42. What I dont get .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume that the hack was done through some form of social engineering and/or that social engineering played a part leading up to the hack. Could be someone calling posing as an IT Help Desk staff, could be a "forged" email with a "funny" attachment, or getting someone to follow a link to a page with malicious code.

    Directly hacking an email server through a firewall without being on the inside of the network is extremely though and would require as a minimum some unknown zero day exploit ... it would also most likely result in the entire server compromised and not one (or a few) account(s).

    Getting back to "What I dont get ...."

    In literally all companies I worked at there has been new-starter security training to educated about "social engineering" and other attempts of getting inside information to use in an attack. In my current companies we even every 12 month do a security awareness training and refresher course (online learning) that everyone has to do (and those that do not complete the course in time will be locked out from the network!) to reinforces this.

    Considering this is the While House, a "prime target" for hacks, I don't get that they are not more rigorous with training staff in these dangers and how to mitigate and identify them - this is even more important at the low level functions where you may have increased turnover, less awareness/less knowledge in general about security/threats, less knowledge about IT in general etc.

    I am utterly surprised that these things happen again and again and believe it to be a failure by management NOT to train their staff adequately and rigorously.

  43. I ask you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this disgrace ever end?

    As we choose between a person who has unquestionably betrayed the United States of America and some douche bag I have hated since he proclaimed, "You are fired!" I seriously question the integrity of the USA. I watch as our country continues to fail at having even a ghost of decent representation. How is it that the worst of humanity leads us?

    How it is that... this... is our first lady?

    How can we condemn dictators when this human trash, Bush, Clinton, and Obama... lead us.

    When people from other countries condemn us I find that I can't really fault their logic.

    This world is broken and the United States of America really can't claim leadership in this world when we continually fail this world.

    We need to fix this failure, and perhaps we need the efforts of others to fix this problem as our leaders are a sickening joke upon humanity.

    One could extrapolate that we must be worthless idiots if this... trash... we make our leadership.

  44. Wait... by darkitecture · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute... since when were you allowed to smile in a passport photo?

    I had to resubmit my passport application once because the photo provided apparently involved a smirk. Really not kidding.

  45. Maybe they should stop using email by adfraggs · · Score: 1

    Or do what Hilliary did and set up their own server. For all of the fuss that was made about it, she was never actually hacked and most of the emails were eventually released by the state department to anyone who wanted to see them. Goes to show that using government servers doesn't guarantee anything, and that's not even considering people like Snowden.

  46. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The contractors don't get much funding after suggesting correctly everyday police work will uncover the insider.
    With experts pushing Russia, China in the press, contractors can request huge new software support rentals and hardware investments, bid for ongoing gov staff training.
    Then upgrades and a new generation of security related software and hardware will keep that ubiquitous Skilled Bear v 3.0 out of any gov network.
    Academic grants to study other nations educational structures, write reports on the kind of code patterns their best university graduates will be unable to hide.
    Having a real nation as the origin to show political leaders is a corporate and academic funding dream. Suggesting a local police effort to find an insider will get a real result but no big contracts or grants.
    So expect a lot of people online with a mil, gov background to be pushing early and wild stories about traces of code, other nations ip ranges, time zones, logs been found.
    Why let a cyber crisis to go to waste and not cash in on decades of no bid federal cyber funding by suggest police interview a few staff members?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  47. Re:now that would be ironic. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    FSFS...

    Michelle LaVaughn Robinson [Obama] was born on January 17, 1964, in Chicago, Illinois, ...

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  48. Re:Don't forget the FBI's "intelligent conversatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the quote was "adult conversation".

    Fuck that guy.

  49. How come SHE got to smile? by therealbev · · Score: 1

    When we got ours smiles were forbidden.