Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Leaks Michelle Obama's Passport (nypost.com)

The hacker who leaked Colin Powell's private email account last week has struck again. This time they have hacked a low-level White House staffer and released a picture of Michelle Obama's passport, along with detailed schedules for top U.S. officials and private email messages. New York Post reports: The information has been posted online by the group DC Leaks. The White House staffer -- who also apparently does advance work for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign -- is named Ian Mellul. The released documents include a PowerPoint outline of Vice President Joe Biden's recent Cleveland trip, showing his planned route, where he'll meet with individuals and other sensitive information, according to the Daily Mail. In an email to The Post, the hacker writes, "The leaked files show the security level of our government. If terrorists hack emails of White House Office staff and get such sensitive information we will see the fall of our country." The hacker adds, "We hope you will tell the people about this criminal negligence of White House Office staffers."

63 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Totally. by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

    If terrorists hack emails of White House Office staff and get such sensitive information we will see the fall of our country."

    Yeah, I totally believe you're an American. Totally. Look, this is my not-being-sarcastic face.

    --
    "You abandoned me! You abandoned my hatred!" "I... I have cuttlefish..."
    1. Re:Totally. by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the contrary?

    2. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nyalarthotep?

    3. Re:Totally. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I assumed they must be Chinese. Who else could claim ownership of the US "our country"?

      Wait, so you don't consider it to be your country? Maybe that is why your country is so screwed up if you do not think of yourself as having "ownership" of it. You think the problems are for someone else to solve.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:Totally. by chispito · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the contrary?

      Simple: risk vs reward. Why release such trivial and mundane information unless you're basically immune to repercussions?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    5. Re:Totally. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Who else could claim ownership of the US "our country"?

      Mexico. Next question?

    6. Re:Totally. by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well considering that only Americans could be dumb enough to think this kind of low level data is "such sensitive information"

      Apparently, you don't understand anything about the physical security of dignitaries and top officials.

      Travel plans, routes, and details about the stops of heads of state are always considered highly sensitive security information. This country is full of extremely stupid, gullible, and ridiculously-overarmed people, and a small subset of whom probably thinks it would be a good thing to bring harm to the First Lady. The Secret Service plans the routes, the stops, provides decoy vehicles, and secures each of those locations to an incredible degree; but no amount of effort can secure every location against a patient, well-camouflaged, entrenched sniper. Uncertainty in the travel routes is one of the best ways to keep the lone wolves from being able to plant themselves along the route.

      So yes, it is highly sensitive information.

      --
      John
    7. Re:Totally. by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Always be praised.

    8. Re: Totally. by Pop69 · · Score: 2

      Britain, France, the actual natives that were there before the European invasion.

    9. Re:Totally. by Immerman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ego and bragging rights? Everyone knows the leet haxxors get all the babes...

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Secret Service plans the routes, the stops, provides decoy vehicles, and secures each of those locations to an incredible degree [...]

      At least for the transportation component, why do they do static routes? Why not do like the British do and have it completely dynamic and basically made up as you go along:

      * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmZ7hhREZhI

      Have a few decoys, but it seems much more elegant than fencing off large parts of city streets.

    11. Re:Totally. by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Well considering that only Americans could be dumb enough to think this kind of low level data is "such sensitive information"

      Apparently, you don't understand anything about the physical security of dignitaries and top officials.

      Travel plans, routes, and details about the stops of heads of state are always considered highly sensitive security information.

      I'm sure it's considered highly sensitive by the people whose job it is to make sure as many things fall under their scope of work as possible, but is it really? I mean this has now been leaked and what is the impact? No injuries or deaths, nothing. Maybe we shouldn't just believe these things are special because the people who are paid to look after special things say they are.

    12. Re:Totally. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      What evidence do you have of the contrary?

      The fact that he thinks making it slightly easier to assassinate Joe Biden will bring down the country.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    13. Re:Totally. by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

      In short it's a trade off between your resources and the supposed resources of the attacker. Even though SO14 escorts "heads of state" they don't escort the US first lady, etc. they bring their own apparatus.

      So, since SO14/Britain couldn't do what the US does, because it would be too disruptive and cost too much given the level of threat and resources, the US secret service can. They have both a higher threat to deal with, and the resource to do so.

      It's the same as in the military. If you just want to know what's going on, sneaking a four man recon patrol in, using maximum stealth is the way to go. However, if you expect the enemy to be too thick on the ground for that (problem with small patrols is that they go missing all the time, and then what?), an armoured reconnaissance battalion is the way to go. So either go very small, or sufficiently large. If you can't cordon off the area and man the whole route, then go small and stealthy, trying not to give away anything. If you can, then you go whole hog, complete with barriers and "x" number of officers per yard of road travelled.

      This of course also depends on your objective. If you check the SO14 film, it's a couple of cars. The presidential motorcade OTOH isn't that far off in size from an armoured reconnaissance battalion (well, company at least), so they have to behave like one. You couldn't bring that kind of mass of vehicles and people through on a contingency basis anyway, all traffic would grind to a halt, and the smallest fender bender ahead of you would make you a static target. So, you're basically forced to go the whole nine yards anyway, and hence you have to do it properly.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    14. Re: Totally. by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      So it would be fair and square to invade the US now, exterminate 90% of the population and enslave the rest?

    15. Re:Totally. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And I'm equally sure that you're quite possibly a complete moron and that you're very definitely someone who's never, ever had to deal with actual security issues for important visitors of any sort, much less for heads of state and their families.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    16. Re:Totally. by bigpat · · Score: 1

      If terrorists hack emails of White House Office staff and get such sensitive information we will see the fall of our country."

      Yeah, I totally believe you're an American. Totally. Look, this is my not-being-sarcastic face.

      Regardless, our national security is built on the stronger foundation of common purpose of Liberty and democracy and not merely the ability of our government officials to keep secrets from us and our enemies.

      Sure there are some things that should be secret to keep people safer and which allows our government and military to operate without adversaries knowing their every move. But our national security must be stronger than secrets.

    17. Re:Totally. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      his country is full of extremely stupid, gullible, and ridiculously-overarmed people, and a small subset of whom probably thinks it would be a good thing to bring harm to the First Lady.

      Meanwhile, Jefferson often complained about the never-ending parade of people who walked into his office at all hours of the day to complain.

      But he didn't have a Department of Education. Or bombing campaigns in sixteen countries (the Barbary Pirates not withstanding).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    18. Re:Totally. by Gussington · · Score: 1

      And I'm equally sure that you're quite possibly a complete moron and that you're very definitely someone who's never, ever had to deal with actual security issues for important visitors of any sort, much less for heads of state and their families.

      Oh dear, you couldn't fallen into that any deeper. I have Govt Security Clearance and actually worked on some security related things for the G20 involving exactly that.
      But keep believing whatever it is makes you feel better about your beliefs...

  2. Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Only 5 years? No middle name? Seems suspicious.

    1. Re:Expry date by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Only 5 years? No middle name? Seems suspicious.

      I don't have a middle name. What's suspicious about that?

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know who else doesn't have a middle name? Al Qaeda.

    3. Re:Expry date by jmcharry · · Score: 1

      That is a type P passport, not a diplomatic or official passport. It is probably a fake.

    4. Re:Expry date by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't have a middle name. What's suspicious about that?

      Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama does have a middle name. That's why it's suspicious.

    5. Re:Expry date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ex passport service employee here: Type P=Passport, ID=Identity Document, LP=UN laissez-passer, PT=Travel document (issued under United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951 and its Protocol of 1967)

      It's normal for all passports (including service/special and diplo) to bear the TYPE=P, since well, it's a passport!

    6. Re:Expry date by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I don't have a middle name. What's suspicious about that?

      Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama does have a middle name. That's why it's suspicious.

      Fair enough.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  3. In the end by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    I suppose all of these stupid hacks make us all more security conscious. That's good.... right?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:In the end by rlp · · Score: 2

      You're assuming the learning curve is positive ...

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
  4. Terrorists win by XparXnoiaX · · Score: 2

    This is how it should be. Organizations need to embarrassed and publicly shamed for having lousy security. Otherwise they will never fix it (see also: linkedin, yahoo, verizon, etc). If they don't fix their security, terrorists win.

    --
    Irresponsible disclosure is responsible
    1. Re:Terrorists win by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Sony has been embarrassed several times, so have those other organizations. There's no evidence they've fixed anything in response, because nothing really happens to them. Only thing that's changed recently is that they've taken a page right out of HBO's comedy VEEP and now blame every one of their fuck ups on the Chinese/Russian/North Korean governments.

  5. Smile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hold on, why is she allowed to smile on her passport? This is bullshit

  6. What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieBros by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >> The White House staffer -- who also apparently does advance work for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign -- is named Ian Mellul.

    The one thing the dox's have in common is that they show the Democratic party trying to have a democracy/debate-free transition of power from Obama to Clinton. And this dual-employed "staffer" would seem to fit the profile.

    The group most pissed about the attempted coronation has been Bernie supporters, i.e., anyone leaning left and under 45. That also happens to be most of the IT security gurus I know. (The rest tend to be intelligent and right-leaning and have therefore tuned out both remaining candidates.) So...why are people trying to say "the Russians" when it seems more likely that the hackers are Bernie supporters ticked off that the Democrats kneecapped the only viable progressive in a generation?

  7. NY Post by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    It's not real.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by SirSlud · · Score: 3

    I like the way you make points. You just say stuff, and it sounds right to you, so it must be a good theory. Because you're smart, and you see the world the way it is.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  9. reuse old computers? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    This along with the huge Yahoo email hack, maybe repurpose IBM-360s? I don't think those beasts were ever hacked. Yeah, just being sarcastic as only way for me to vent about all these hacks.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
    1. Re:reuse old computers? by number6x · · Score: 1

      Oh, they were hacked. It's just that the hackers didn't get EBCDIC and kept trying to 'unencrypt' the files they got into ASCII.

  10. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by hey! · · Score: 2

    Sorry, it was the White House that made Cheddar Mussolini the Republican nominee?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  11. Re:If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All of these lootings and BLM assclowns wouldn't be doing this if a white Republican were in office. Were I in charge, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. OUt come the snarling 120 lb German Shepherds. Let's see how quickly these dumb niggers learn not to loot.

    Some riots during the GWB presidency:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unrest_in_the_United_States#2000s

    Cincinnati riots of 2001
    Benton Harbor riots (see 2003)
    Miami FTAA Protests
    2004 American League Championship Series (wow sports riots!)
    Civil disturbances and military action in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
    2005 Toledo riot (Neo-Nazi's!)
    San Bernardino punk riot (more Neo-Nazis!)
    2007 MacArthur Park rallies (Go police riot!)

    Huzzah, I guess you aren't on top of affairs, Bull Connor Jr.

  12. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is Al CIA Qaeda.

  13. Wow by s.petry · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You start okay, because yeah many of us are fed up with a political class running ram-shod over the rest of us so that they can work toward their global domination agenda. Obama's UN speech made it clear that he does not care as much about sovereignty as he does about that agenda. The "We" in his speech that need to make sacrifices to support that end do not include him and the political class who has been wiping their ass with the US Constitution for decades. You in Europe are not much better off, but in fairness we have lost much more liberty because we had more.

    Then, you go off to the deep end. Most intellectuals working in security are for personal Liberty, which is the exact opposite of Sanders. That leaves us with Trump as the only hope, which does not have great odds but it's better than a very well known liar. Sanders attracted crusaders who are not well educated in history, not the students of history. Sanders was shat upon, but that was in the cards when he was chosen to run against her. He got a decent retirement plan for his efforts, he's not too worried. People who followed him on the other hand found the system to be corrupt and many have dropped out. Study Communist transformation, and you will see that demoralizing the populace is requirement in large doses. This crap was well known 50 years ago and published by defecting KGB agents.

    Why do people say "Russians"? That is a multi-part answer. The easiest is that it takes people's eyes away from the wrong doing you started with. Will this double dipping person face any penalty for shafting tax payers? Will the people who employed her? Obama is running around on Tax payer dollars for Hillary fundraisers and campaign purposes. But hey, look at those stinky Russians.

    I'll grant you that the game is complex, but it's not "that" complex if you focus on the team playing. They own the media and own most politicians, and it's a club that you can't join.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Wow by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Remind me, which of the two major political parties supports giving away ICANN? Which of the two won't shut the fuck up about "hate speech" when they encounter someone they disagree with? Who's supporters are going on about inane issues such as "Air conditioning is sexist" and "Because you're X, you can't talk about Y" (X being sexual orientation or skin color).

      Both parties are completely fucked, but I would easily trust the right to preserve freedom of speech over the left.

  14. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If we're going to just make shit up with no evidence, why not say it was aliens?

  15. But not Trump's Taxes? by tekrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    How is it that we can have everything on the Democrats hacked, *everything*, but not one little thing comes out from the RNC? I find that highly suspicious.

    Perhaps the RNC is paying someone or is colluding with the Soviets to hack the election.

    If only Anonymous could obtain Trump's taxes to even the score a bit...

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:But not Trump's Taxes? by KeensMustard · · Score: 2
      What would be the point?

      If they aren't embarrassed by the things Trump says and does, and by the fact that they had no-one, not one person, in the ranks of the party that they thought was better qualified to lead the party and the country then Donald Trump, they surely wouldn't be embarrassed by the release of schedules or private emails.

      How can the private things be MORE embarrassing then the dirty laundry of Donald's mouth? That just boggles the mind.

      Every few days we hear of another republican disowning him and his bizzarro worldview. What could be said that's more embarrassing?

  16. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, you probably live in an old-school Republic precinct. The kind of town where folks at they Y thoughtfully leave their back issues of Rich Protestant Golfer magazine behind so others will have something to read on the treadmill. The kind of place where you serve your guests drinks in the living room, not on the kitchen table. Good people, but sometimes a little obtuse about how the other 80% live.

    Trump locked down the non-traditionals, and the rest of the Republicans were splitting the traditional R vote a dozen ways. Add to that primary rules that were written to favor early front runners. Those rules worked like a charm: instead of the agony of prolonged uncertainty the party suffered the agony of premature certainty.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  17. Re:If Trump wins... by r1348 · · Score: 1

    We are really sorry for your virility issues.

  18. Maybe Trump didn't choose the lowest bidder for IT by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Maybe Trump's company didn't use the lowest bidder on all of their IT projects.

  19. Maybe Russian, maybe Bernie. Let's say communists by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Maybe it was Russians, maybe it was Bernians. Since we don't know which, let's use a term which includes both - communists.

  20. It's a FAKE! by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    SORRY but this is a FAKE! Look at the issue and expiration dates.... It shows it's only good for 5 years. REAL U.S. Adult passports are good for 10 years!

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:It's a FAKE! by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Does that apply to special issuance passports for official state department travel/business or other "special" passports?

      Obama was elected in 2008 so the family getting official business passports in December 2008 isn't far fetched. Add 5 years puts it in 2013 when it gets reissued. Not saying that is what happened, but it'd be plausible.

  21. Don't forget the FBI's "intelligent conversation" by charliemerritt03 · · Score: 1

    The head of the FBI has stated that this year they "are gathering the data" for an "intelligent conversation" next year about "encryption". I think this type of story should be catalogued, indexed, made available for that conversation. Add to that the just revealed 500 Million account hack at Yahoo. Encrypted files would have made these vacuum cleaner jobs a bit harder ...cm

  22. credit from the true evil: Capital One? by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > They get credit from the true evil in this world

    They a Capital One card?

  23. Look at that smile by fonitrus · · Score: 1

    That is a nice smile. She must have some special privileges to be able to smile on passport photo. Unlike us mere mortals that are forever grumpy looking on our photos.

    1. Re:Look at that smile by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Wookiees smile a lot?

  24. Information wants to be free by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    What's the problem?

    1. Re:Information wants to be free by Gussington · · Score: 1

      There is no problem. But that doesn't stop the people in the business of selling controversy making it one.
      Our role as readers is to learn what is noise and ignore it.

  25. Yeah, the only one who polled losing to Clinton by raymorris · · Score: 1

    True. When there were four or five candidates vying for the Republican nomination, all beat Clinton in head-to-head polling, except Trump. The primary voters chose the candidate who may be worse than Clinton.

    I sure would like to see a good president again. I don't even care too much whether it's a good Democrat or a good Republican. Kennedy or Reagan, either would be a huge improvement over this year's choices and the last few presidents. For younger people, the best president of their lifetime is a guy who simply didn't do much, gpod or bad. A president who spent most of his time chasing women and trying to cover up his womanizing. Sad.

  26. Re:If Trump wins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All of these lootings and BLM assclowns wouldn't be doing this if a white Republican were in office. Were I in charge, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. OUt come the snarling 120 lb German Shepherds. Let's see how quickly these dumb niggers learn not to loot.

    Some riots during the GWB presidency:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unrest_in_the_United_States#2000s

    Cincinnati riots of 2001
    Benton Harbor riots (see 2003)
    Miami FTAA Protests
    2004 American League Championship Series (wow sports riots!)
    Civil disturbances and military action in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina
    2005 Toledo riot (Neo-Nazi's!)
    San Bernardino punk riot (more Neo-Nazis!)
    2007 MacArthur Park rallies (Go police riot!)

    Huzzah, I guess you aren't on top of affairs, Bull Connor Jr.

    Yeah, but at least while Bush was President we didn't have any damn terrorists.

    Aside from 9/11. Or the smaller follow up. LAX shootup too. Which is why we need to focus on them A-rabs and profile more. Profiling has never failed to turn up a bad A-rab and they are aLWAYS the bad guys.

    Except for the anthrax letters, or the first couple 'pox issues too. Oh, and that sniper, he turned out to be black. And not alone. But otherwise, ITS ALWAYS LONE WOLF ARABS and totally Obummer's fault!

  27. Wait... by darkitecture · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute... since when were you allowed to smile in a passport photo?

    I had to resubmit my passport application once because the photo provided apparently involved a smirk. Really not kidding.

  28. Maybe they should stop using email by adfraggs · · Score: 1

    Or do what Hilliary did and set up their own server. For all of the fuss that was made about it, she was never actually hacked and most of the emails were eventually released by the state department to anyone who wanted to see them. Goes to show that using government servers doesn't guarantee anything, and that's not even considering people like Snowden.

  29. Re:What if the hackers are just pissed off BernieB by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The contractors don't get much funding after suggesting correctly everyday police work will uncover the insider.
    With experts pushing Russia, China in the press, contractors can request huge new software support rentals and hardware investments, bid for ongoing gov staff training.
    Then upgrades and a new generation of security related software and hardware will keep that ubiquitous Skilled Bear v 3.0 out of any gov network.
    Academic grants to study other nations educational structures, write reports on the kind of code patterns their best university graduates will be unable to hide.
    Having a real nation as the origin to show political leaders is a corporate and academic funding dream. Suggesting a local police effort to find an insider will get a real result but no big contracts or grants.
    So expect a lot of people online with a mil, gov background to be pushing early and wild stories about traces of code, other nations ip ranges, time zones, logs been found.
    Why let a cyber crisis to go to waste and not cash in on decades of no bid federal cyber funding by suggest police interview a few staff members?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  30. Re:now that would be ironic. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    FSFS...

    Michelle LaVaughn Robinson [Obama] was born on January 17, 1964, in Chicago, Illinois, ...

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  31. How come SHE got to smile? by therealbev · · Score: 1

    When we got ours smiles were forbidden.