Slashdot Mirror


Google Rebrands 'Apps for Work' To 'G Suite,' Adds New Features (thenextweb.com)

Google has renamed "Apps for Work" to "G Suite" to "help people everywhere work and innovate together, so businesses can move faster and go bigger." They have also added a bunch of new features, such as a "Quick Access" section for Google Drive for Android that uses machine learning to predict what files you're going to need when you open up the app, based off your previous behavior. Calendar will automatically pick times to set up meetings through the use of machine intelligence. Sheets is also using AI "to turn your layman English requests into formulas through its 'Explore' feature," reports The Next Web. "In Slides, Explore uses machine learning to dynamically suggest and apply design ideas, while in Docs, it will suggest backup research and images you can use in your musings, as well as help you insert files from your Drive account. Throughout Docs, Sheets, and Slides, you can now recover deleted files on Android from a new 'Trash' option in the side/hamburger menu." Google's cloud services will now fall under a new "Google Cloud" brand, which includes G Suite, Google Cloud Platform, new machine learning tools and APIs, and Google's various devices that access the cloud. Slashdot reader wjcofkc adds: I just received the following email from Google. When I saw the title, my first thought was that there was malware lying at the end -- further inspection proved it to be real. Is this the dumbest name change in the history of name changes? Google of all companies does not have to try so hard. "Hello Google Apps Customer, We created Google Apps to help people everywhere work and innovate together, so that your organization can move faster and achieve more. Today, we're introducing a new name that better reflects this mission: G Suite. Over the coming weeks, you'll see our new name and logo appear in familiar places, including the Admin console, Help Center, and on your invoice. G Suite is still the same all-in-one solution that you use every day, with the same powerful tools -- Gmail, Docs, Drive, and Calendar. Thanks for being part of the journey that led us to G Suite. We're always improving our technology so it learns and grows with your team. Visit our official blog post to learn more."

63 comments

  1. OMG Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Google has changed this service more times... For some reason I like this service, bit jiminy, stabilize!

  2. I wonder if they thought this through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds an awful lot like "g-spot."

    1. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds an awful lot like "g-spot."

      Well, hopefully it will be more user-friendly, since apparently there are many who still can't make it work.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    2. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by _merlin · · Score: 1

      Or "g-suit", the inflatable pants worn by fighter pilots to stop blood pooling in legs/feet during high-g manoeuvres.

    3. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sounds an awful lot like "g-spot."

      "move faster and go bigger"

      Well, at least Google is working with a theme here. (The theme of course being "you're fucked".)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more a service location issue. It'd be great if only more people could find it!

    5. Re: I wonder if they thought this through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G-spot works! Youredtube porn! Is google trying to tell us something?

    6. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. First Youtube Red (too close to Redtube) and now G Suite (G-Spot)... Are they about to get into the porn industry or something?

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    7. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      Sounds an awful lot like "g-spot."

      I came here to say exactly that, and to ask if fingering it will make Google squirt...

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    8. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Ah yes...There's the G-Suite-Spot...

    9. Re: I wonder if they thought this through. by bleugh · · Score: 1

      Gooogle search, now to be called "g spot"

    10. Re: I wonder if they thought this through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to post "do I have to find the g-spot before I can use the g-suite" looks like you beat me sir.

    11. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Sounds an awful lot like "g-spot."

      They decided against that as they were afraid no one would be able to find it.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    12. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing. First Youtube Red (too close to Redtube) and now G Suite (G-Spot)... Are they about to get into the porn industry or something?

      Data mining is the new pornography of the twenty-first century young man. Go data and seek your fortune.

    13. Re:I wonder if they thought this through. by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 2

      The could call the whole line of apps the g-string.

  3. Google wants you to touch their G Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you can find it

  4. basic features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wake me up when you can filter and sort on messages in mail, only allow access to G-whateva from certain src IPs, freeze an account and have it read only for a much reduced monthly fee (like when employees leaves) etc etc etc x100

    1. Re:basic features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Why can't I have a "show how big a folder is" in Google Drive? Or how about a way, as a G Suite admin to change ownership of individual files or folders without having to use some third party application or writing my own program? Aren't they supposed to be smart to create some simple features like this?

    2. Re:basic features by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      Why can't I have a "show how big a folder is" in Google Drive?

      I feel your pain, but it is actually a hard problem. Folders do not exist in Drive. They are just the result of a specialized search. Having files locatable using tags associated with them, and all files being stored all over the globe provides some pretty cool capabilities. A single item typically is stored in several different places, for redundancy and speed of access reasons. The same file can also exist in many different "virtual locations" at the same time, with an individual deciding where it best fits in their own hierarchy (possibly several places for the same individual for cases where a traditional filesystem would use links).

      However, it does suck when you really do wish they behaved like real folders. It would be fiendishly difficult, when tags change, or even files renamed, moved or deleted, to maintain indexes for each individual user of the items in their own Google Drives.

    3. Re:basic features by GNious · · Score: 1

      Install Google Drive desktop app, wait for it to sync, let your OS tell you how big a given folder is - simples!

    4. Re:basic features by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      Great now all I need to do is check how much space I need to allocate for the synced copy... goes back to Google drive... ummmm now what?

    5. Re:basic features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except Box works very similar, and they do have this feature, and a lot of others, which is why my employer chose that over Google. Unfortunately I also help out at a non-profit who is using Google Apps, and run into a lot of features that are missing, but available in other sites. For the folder size, I did find a third party Google Apps script that could do this, but you had to give that script full access to your Google Drive, which is something I'm not likely to do.

      The bigger issue for me is that as a super admin there's very little I can do as far as managing permissions and ownership of files, unless the owner has granted me permission or, I reset that users password, login as them, make the changes I need, then tell them they have to reset their password. Again, there are some third party apps that have been created using Googles APIs, but you have to give that third part full access in order to do anything.

    6. Re:basic features by Hulfs · · Score: 1

      I'm going to call BS here. Folders DO exist as object in Drive, they're technically just specialized files with a mime type of application/vnd.google-apps.folder. Every file in Drive has parent(s) - which are either a folder or the drive root. It is very easy to walk the folder object hierarchy listing what files were in each folder and report on the sizes. Just using the public REST API I could write a script to do this in a few minutes, it's not going to be the fastest thing in the word, but it's not hard to implement. There's no way Google couldn't easily do this.

      There's a weak argument to be made that since files can technically belong to several folders that telling you how much data is in one folder and you added all your folder sizes together that they wouldn't match your total drive usage (your total usage may be smaller).

    7. Re:basic features by GNious · · Score: 1

      If it only has your files, look left side where it says something like "17/19 GB used" ?

    8. Re:basic features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure each item has a size, perhaps the same query could IDK, use a SUM function?

  5. G Suite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Line up the underwear jokes!

  6. Looking for the exit by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    I was actually using Google for Work as a spam filter service, but they have thrown so much other stuff in that spreads sticky fingers all over your Android system. Back to an Open Source solution. Who runs a good crowdsourced spam filter these days?

    1. Re:Looking for the exit by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      What "sticky fingers" do you see?

      I mean, it's Google so you expect a certain level of intrusiveness and they must read the e-mail to characterize it for filtering. But I find their spam filtering to be the best going precisely because it's crowd-sourced. The sheer volume of users would be tough for any other shared database to duplicate, but I'd be curious what responses you get, myself.

      I see no reason for a name change, but VPs need to make themselves appear useful somehow, I guess. If Google would limit its changes to names and color themes I'd be happy, but they seem to reduce functionality and rip out features with every "upgrade" across many of their apps any more. If it aint broke, don't fix it.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    2. Re:Looking for the exit by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      A Google login, whether you get it via gmail or "G Suite", ties into all of the Android apps and keeps search history and integrates it into other Google products, and runs synchronization of most app data so they can see a great deal of what you do on the phone. About the worst that you can do is turn on device management. It will take about two days to turn off and during that time it will do its very best to force your email users to put their devices under your control. After that you apparently even have control over booting of the device. It's enough to make me want to support another open phone. Mozilla just gave up the ghost on that.

    3. Re: Looking for the exit by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Sticky fingers you'll get if you spend a long time looking for the g-spot!

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    4. Re: Looking for the exit by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      G the F out of here!

    5. Re:Looking for the exit by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1

      I have not tried a hosted spam filtering service, but I have had success with using amavisd on my email server once I trained the Bayesian filter with my spam and ham corpus. I also turned on razor, SORBS, SURBL, Spamhaus, and BRBL. The MTA is configured to drop pathological email attempts.

      On any given day, at least 50% (and sometimes up to 75%, the weekly average is 60%) of the spam attempts get dropped before anything is delivered for filtering. Amavisd is able identify around 50% to 70% of the spam during filtering, which gets automatically redirected to the Junk folder. I could probably improve that a bit more, but it does not seem to be worthwhile at this point.

    6. Re:Looking for the exit by ooloorie · · Score: 1

      A Google login, whether you get it via gmail or "G Suite", ties into all of the Android apps and keeps search history and integrates it into other Google products, and runs synchronization of most app data so they can see a great deal of what you do on the phone.

      Gosh, what does that remind me of? Oh, right, every networked workstation since networked workstations have been around: they store their mail, configuration files, history files, and documents on a central server and run remote management, configuration, and update scripts. They do that because it's convenient for users: it provides backup and means users don't have to work as system administrators for their own computers. Of course, Google has an additional reason for doing it: they run machine learning software over it to (1) send you relevant ads (that's why these services are free), and (2) give you functionality you wouldn't otherwise get. Oh how very evil of them!

      About the worst that you can do is turn on device management. It will take about two days to turn off and during that time it will do its very best to force your email users to put their devices under your control. After that you apparently even have control over booting of the device.

      Centralized control is the whole point device management exists. Why would you turn it on if you don't want to use it?

      It's enough to make me want to support another open phone. Mozilla just gave up the ghost on that.

      Well, if you only did! I'm sure the only contribution that cracking the technically tough nuts of large scale privacy-preserving remote management, machine learning, and backup still needs is your benevolent support! People are just holding back all the good stuff because Bruce Perens hasn't given it His blessing! Never mind that Firefox OS isn't meaningfully more private or secure than any other of the shitty phone operating systems out there! Remember kids: all it takes to create great technology is Bruce Perens' blessing!

    7. Re:Looking for the exit by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I don't know about crowd sourced, but I am using FastMail these days.

      It does everything that I used to use Google Apps for: multiple domains and aliases and spam filtering. I love it. Plus, as the name implies, the web interface is very snappy.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  7. Name Better than Alternative by perry64 · · Score: 2

    Although the poster had an issue with the name, I thought "G Suite" is better than the alternative, "G Spot."

    More practical, too - half the population wouldn't use something named "G Spot, since most men can't find it and would swear it doesn't really exist!!

  8. G Suite for the G Unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGpYoMCpjBw&sns=gp

  9. one account all of google by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Fell for that line and logged into G Suite (aka: Apps for work) with it.

    Worked on my Google domain for a week to do what an FTP program would taken seconds to of done; only to find this site an exception to the fact.

    Said screw it and let a $10 domain run out, would of nickeled and dimed me to death in the long run anyhow.

  10. They missed a golden opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would have been a lot more credible and interesting if they had created a spot for all their applications... the G Spot.

  11. "Machine Learning"??? by darkain · · Score: 1

    Machine learning, really? They mean the "recent documents" feature that has been apart of windows, since what, '98 or so? Super Cool Story, Bro!

  12. Never updated by fermion · · Score: 2

    The collaboration in the word processor is nice, but even Apple has that to some extent now. Google does this a lot, provides a decent product then ignores it and lets it get stale. I was thinking they were going to kill it off like they do with most of their products. Does the spreadsheet have a real regression line feature yet?

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Never updated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not quite certain if the word processor and spreadsheet are part of Apps for Work/G Suite, so your comment may be a bit off-topic.

      The "Apps for Work" seemed to be something along "package these independent Google services that could also be used separately into something enterprisey-ish". I have never managed to get a grasp of what additional value it is supposed to provide over just using the free services.

    2. Re: Never updated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apps for work are reachable at my.domain not Google.com.

  13. I can't stand "predictive" software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's like some weird mutation of Clippy. It never works properly and as such, just gets in your way.

  14. Google losing focus by swell · · Score: 1

    The engineers and creatives who founded Google brought us powerful tools that made us more productive. Now, with money in the bank, they are hiring marketing people and MBAs and they are 'sprucing up their image' and trying to appeal to advertisers.

    It's all going downhill at Google/Alphabet. Relax. Inhale deeply. Now rethink the plan.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re: Google losing focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has never had focus. Search gave them money and then they completely went off the rails and never looked back.

  15. Too many useless managers by flyingfsck · · Score: 2

    Rebranding is a symptom of too many useless and bored managers in the marketing department.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Too many useless managers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also a sign that the product name is synonymous of garbage,

      The hope is that with a rebrand people would forget how crappy the product is and would try it again.

    2. Re:Too many useless managers by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      I don't get the strategy. If the product is crappy, why would people change their minds about its crappiness with a rebranding?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    3. Re:Too many useless managers by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      Does this mean the App Store is now the Gspot?

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    4. Re:Too many useless managers by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      Because marketing decrees you have to do something stupid to your product every year so people won't forget about it.

    5. Re:Too many useless managers by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      I think the rebranding has nothing to do with the 'product being crappy'. It's an attempt to unify what are now thought of as a bunch of separate products - and get potential customers thinking about the whole package. Yes, as an attempt to compete with Microsoft's similar suite.

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  16. Amazing features... not by lucm · · Score: 1

    So this thing will pick up meeting dates and guess which files you want. Nice. But you still cannot create a fucking MAILING LIST. You want a nice support@yourcompany.com? You have to pick ONE mailbox (which cannot be shared).

    Their solution: use Google Groups. Which are useless especially since you have to whitelist every sender. And still no real backup.

    Sad to say but those guys are 5+ years behind Office365.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re: Amazing features... not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not need to whitelist groups senders. I regularly create a Google group every time I want to create a new email alias or have a bunch of people handle a support mail address.

  17. Aweful name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously they are TERRIBLE at naming things. Sounds too much like G-String.

  18. Present with your G-point ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They forgot about presentations - show the G-point!

  19. Run out of ideas? by ConallB · · Score: 1

    Have you run out of ideas to improve your product? Is listening to your customers too difficult and time consuming?

    Why not do what every lazy marketing department does, REBRAND!

    It gives the illusion of doing something whilst actually doing nothing. Who cares if you are doing something as long as it _feels_ like you are!

    Now available wherever the kool-aid is drunk!

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  20. Makes searching easier by Geeky · · Score: 1

    This could make searching for things related to it easier. The trouble with "apps" is that searching for "google apps" brings up stuff relating to Android apps and other irrelevant stuff. At least "suite", if it takes off as a name, will make searching for answers specific to the application suite easier than "apps", which is just too generic to be searchable.

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  21. Uuuuuuurrrggggh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Thanks for being part of the journey that led us to G Suite."

    There's nothing more nauseating than this type of would-be-touchy-feely, soulless corporate bullshit.

  22. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move along, nothing to see here.

  23. Always add features. Never fix problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This applies to google and everybody else - including Linux.

    Instead of heaping on "features" that nobody wants, why not make software that doesn't suck? Why not fix long standing problems that users have been begging to have fixed?

    Why not take the same familiar software, and make it awesome, instead of changing the interface, rebranding, adding useless features, and making it suck worse than ever?

  24. Clippy by CauseBy · · Score: 1

    Does this...

    "In Slides, Explore uses machine learning to dynamically suggest and apply design ideas, while in Docs, it will suggest backup research and images you can use in your musings, as well as help you insert files from your Drive account." ...sound like Clippy to anybody else?

  25. Wonderful Infomration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very useful information. Thank you so much.

    Barack Obama

    Quickbooks Support