Slashdot Mirror
LinkedIn Now Lets You Look For New Job Without Your Existing Boss Finding Out (venturebeat.com)
A new feature on LinkedIn can come in handy to thousands. An anonymous reader writes: LinkedIn has removed an obstacle preventing some members from using the professional social network from finding their next job: The possibility of their current boss finding out. On Thursday, the company released its Open Candidates feature which now lets members privately notify recruiters that they're open for opportunities without exposing themselves to their current company. Additionally, businesses are also receiving updated career pages that can be used to better market themselves to potential hires. In research conducted in the past year, LinkedIn claimed that 77 percent of professional workers are open to their next opportunity. However, with social media, the fear has been that any signal made on a profile could get back to an employer, which is why the Open Candidates feature lets anyone operate stealthily. It's perfect for those who are open to change, but aren't precisely set on making a move... yet. "This is a signal to recruiters that you want to hear from them," explained Eric Owski, LinkedIn's head of talent brand products.
Why wouldn't I want my boss to know that there are other people chomping at the bit to hire me and that if he wants to keep me around he'd better make sure the money's worth it?
It would be great if Linked In had a make me move feature like Zillow where a candidate could post a Salary which would make them leave their current job
**Life is too short to be serious**
I work for a recruiter, you insensitive clod!
Where prospective candidates can pick up a phone and discretely call a company or head hunter about a job. Then call in sick a week later to attend an interview.
Up next, the further expansion of information markets to overcome this minor obstacle, providing "enhanced employee loyalty metrics" as yet another valued add-on to their existing datasets. Good times! -PCP
All this will do is sell one additional recruiter account per company, where the HR department browses applicants from home. That will last until someone devises an automated solution and sells the data scrape to the HR departments directly.
I used to use Ashley Madison to look for new strange without my existing wife finding out. Long story short, she found out and now I have a different wife. Since most recruiters seem to be hot women (and plenty of twinks for our startup brothers), maybe they could also discretely offer (blow-) jobs without my new wife finding out?
Copyright (c) 1990 - 2014 Dice. All rights reserved. Use of this comment is subject to certain Terms and Conditions.
Because different bosses have different attitudes, different companies have different cultures, and between countries there can be huge cultural differences. The way it works out for you may be completely different from the way it works out for someone else working for a different company in a different country.
I am an employer, who hires folks . My HR team gave me "linked in recruiter" rights, for a special account - can basically search *.*.
I think that this isn't really thought through, to say 'um, do we think that employers will have recruiter accounts, and if they wanted to, could see their employees ?'. Kinda, likely, silly.
Is what it should say
New in LinkedIn for 2017: check which of your employees searched for new jobs with Open Candidates! Only $10,000 per year! (Disclaimer: additional license required to view employees who have purchased Open Candidates Plus)
Who pays the bills at LinkedIn? Users or Recruiters?
Users are the product, and LinkedIn will polish the product any way the recruiters want them to.
Microsoft is leveraging their LinkedIn buy to get into the Managed Services Provider Market as well, promoting themselves and companies that use their products.
Remember when Microsoft got caught up in that class action lawsuit pertaining to suppressing market wages? Same deal here.
For those reasons, this will devolve into EBay. Some opportunities, with a lot of sketchy and illegal crap going on.
LinkedIn is little more than an incestuous whore market, where people sell each other and make themselves feel important and great. It is pretty pathetic.
I maybe old fashioned but controlling this information to a degree is the right approach.
To me linkedin is just another way to sell my info that may backfire.
So that explains all the time you spend up here on Slashdot! You have nothing to do!
LinkedIn has removed an obstacle preventing some members from using the professional social network from finding their next job:
Is it an easier way to remove your details from LinkedIn?
If anyone has learned anything from Facebook, it should be that your Friends count isn't a count of people who can rely on you for anything.
This wouldn't be necessary if not for discrimination against the unemployed. Applicants need to be currently employed to find work, preferably already doing the kind of work they are applying for, and preferably already employed by the company at which they are applying. There is no economic mobility in this economy, except for being expelled from the workforce permanently, and being unemployed means being unemployable.
... welcome the new Linkedin overlords! (they are all available to find new "challenges" [in coporate lang] now)
I've always hated the whole cat and mouse game that's involved with finding a new job. You have to sneak around, start calling contacts, hope one of them doesn't spill the beans to someone else both they and your boss knows, etc. It's just one of those things you wish you could be open about, but you know you can't.
The problem is that even managers who aren't insecure know that if someone's looking, and they're good, they're unhappy and will be gone as soon as they can find something that they like. Note that I said "that they like" instead of "that pays more." Lots of employee moves aren't due to compensation. I work at my current employer for less than I could be making elsewhere because at this point in my life I trade off a flexible, stable job for reduced earning potential. Not everyone is a nomadic childless consultant who doesn't even have a permanent address because they travel so much. By the same token, not everyone is a family guy working a stable job who wants to see their kids go through school in the same place rather than move 3 times in 10 years.
It's like mental illness...if some way could be found to remove the stigma around talking about it, things would improve. If employees felt they could go to their boss with concerns and not worry about being targeted for layoffs or being fired, things would work out much better. The problem is that in the current climate, you can't tell your boss "Hey, I'm not totally happy here because [tangible reasons]" or "Hey, I could use another 5% in salary because [tangible reasons]." Even if your boss were supportive and understanding, everyone's deathly afraid of unemployment...especially if you're over 40. Getting caught out in a layoff when you're over 40 makes it significantly harder to find new work. Employers just assume anyone over 40 is too old, and anyone unemployed can't possibly be any good.
The lady who found me for my current job, she is a recruiter for several different companies. Hence if she knows I'm looking, you can assume my employer knows I'm looking.
Secondly, my previous employer knew I was looking because I had connected with tons of recruiters. I am still connecting with tons of recruiters, but I now have my activity not going to my feed.
everyone's deathly afraid of unemployment...especially if you're over 40. Getting caught out in a layoff when you're over 40 makes it significantly harder to find new work. Employers just assume anyone over 40 is too old, and anyone unemployed can't possibly be any good.
Basic Income will fix the stigma of unemployment.
How do I flag my profile for recruiters to say I am not interested in moving and please stop emailing/calling me? That would actually be useful :)
---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"
With LinkedIn, as with most social media, the only way to win is not to play. Ignore the useful millennial idiots who insist it is 'Teh Fut0rz!' and anyone who opts out is obsolete. As long as they are still in the minority (and thank god, in my industry they still are) you can still choose to have both a life, and control over your interactions with everyone else.
I'm currently looking for a job, and am actively using Ladders, Monster, CareerBuilder and Dice, but not LinkedIn. And I won't either, until I leave my current employer
This is great and all. but I'd just like their system to work. I am continuously getting email that "John Smith" is still awaiting my invitation. But when I log into the app or the web page, it says "No Invitations" perhaps they should straighten their DB out first, then make improvements.
Outside of that, the two big things they need to deal with are the "Message Streams" which put everything from colleague achievements, work anniversaries, birthdays, and endorsements all on a splash screen. I do not want 41 of my contacts saying "Happy Birthday" when I do not work for them and have only contacted them for professional assistance. Secondly, those endorsements are a joke. The "so-and-so has endorsed you for 'data center'." means absolutely nothing. and the person who endorsed me? Never worked with me professionally. so how would they know?
The app is good for networking professionals and keeping contacts with people I have worked with but don't want to "friend on facebook" because I just want to know if I can reach out to someone for electroplating questions or SQL bench-marking with my cluster and SAN. Not to wish them a happy birthday.
E8B8B
I mean, they can just register a second account in a fake name and pretend they're a recruiter.
It might help those that already have employment, but it doesn't really help those that are still looking.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
you can still tell because its the only time people bother to update their account
How does this work when your company is using recruiters, as most of them do ?