Slashdot Mirror


Bigfoot Spotted Sneaking Around Below Bald Eagle Nest, Multiple Outlets Report (cnet.com)

Take it with a pinch of salt. Maybe some more. Eric Mack, writing for CNET:Bigfoot, that mysteriously unkempt and anti-social gentlemen of the woodlands, has again made an appearance on camera in his trademark blurry yet intriguing style. This time the legendary cryptid has apparently been captured on the CarbonTV Eagle Cam in northern Michigan. The live webcam is trained on a bald eagle nest 100 feet (30 meters) above the ground near the Platte River State Fish Hatchery. In the aforementioned video we see a dark lumbering figure talking into frame about 10 seconds into the clip. The shadowy silhouette of something clearly bipedal makes its way through the stand of trees before walking out of frame. While the creature appears to fit the traditional description of Bigfoot, it also could pretty easily be explained as a bear or a human. Because the camera is capturing the forest floor looking down from 100 feet up, the perspective is a little screwy and it's hard to get much clarity.Further reporting on Time, and Fox.

173 comments

  1. Well, that's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm convinced the editors have resorted to trolling us now.

    1. Re:Well, that's it by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2

      We are being trolled.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    2. Re:Well, that's it by npslider · · Score: 1

      We have found the the truth!! The game is a Foot.

      A rather Big Foot mind you, but a foot none the less.

    3. Re:Well, that's it by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      If they were really trolling us, it would have been a creepy clown.

    4. Re:Well, that's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this is really starting to scrape the bottom of the barrel. Next week they'll be Rickrolling links posted in the summary.

      And yeah, I did look at TFA (though didn't bother watching the video) -- what the heck is going on with it? From TFA:

      This sighting is about on par with other inconclusive bits of evidence..., like the few seconds of something hairy captured in Sequoia National Park earlier this year.

      Is this somebody searching for Bigfoot or a paparazzo trying to score a celebrity crotch shot? What the hell?

    5. Re:Well, that's it by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      A kid dressed like a creepy clown got arrested in my neighborhood for trespassing earlier this week... apparently he was walking through the yards trying to scare someone he knew when a neighbor saw him and called the police. He was a minor so it probably won't be on the news.

    6. Re:Well, that's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couple kids got caught doing that in a town nearby, I think they were cited for public disturbance, but only cause they chased people. Another kid got in trouble in my town for starting an instagram account claiming to be a clown and setting appearances at local schools. Picked up by the police but no formal charges, turned over to the school for punishment as a prank gone awry. Both made local paper, doubt it goes beyond that.

    7. Re:Well, that's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory xkcd cartoon

    8. Re:Well, that's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yaw, that's some good reporting there, Lou.

    9. Re:Well, that's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      science.slashdot.org

      Yeah..."science".

    10. Re:Well, that's it by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      It's not something hairy, it's just a dark humanoid figure. Like some random hiker in a parka, for example.

  2. ...what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This is a story?

  3. Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webcam by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where there are webcams, there will be trolls who put something unexpected into the frame, just far enough away to trick the eye. I may have...er...known someone...who's done this before.

  4. Blurry? by harrkev · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe bigfoot is blurry in real life?

    --
    "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    1. Re:Blurry? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Bigfoot is an extraterrestrial space alien with built in optical stealth technology.

      Sounds feasible.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    2. Re:Blurry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe bigfoot prefers out of focus areas.

    3. Re:Blurry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just might be it! Bigfoots have lens like properties that make them all blurry!

    4. Re:Blurry? by npslider · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the picture had been taken with a Samsung Note 7 it would have been crystal clear, and made for an explosive cover story!

    5. Re:Blurry? by ripvlan · · Score: 2

      Absolutely - he has *Evolved* to use Phase shifting to hide from us humans - knowing that this wavelength of light is just beyond our visible range. Thus remains hidden and safe from us predators

    6. Re:Blurry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you see three little red dots on your chest, dive for cover.

    7. Re:Blurry? by alzoron · · Score: 1

      Confirmed: Bigfoot works for Apple. He's what they test their new revisions of the the reality distortion device on.

    8. Re:Blurry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I liked Mitch Hedberg too.

    9. Re:Blurry? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Maybe bigfoot is blurry in real life?

      It's really a UFO with lowest-bidder cloaking.

    10. Re:Blurry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU dive for cover! I don't have time to bleed.

    11. Re:Blurry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ockham's Razor says I gotta go with that explanation.

    12. Re:Blurry? by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      And that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster, roaming the countryside. "Quick! He's fuzzy! Let's get out of here!"

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    13. Re:Blurry? by silentcoder · · Score: 2

      Or they just vibrate really fast ? Like some spiders do ? It's a form of camoflage that does, in fact, exist in the animal kingdom.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  5. Drunken hunter is dark camo gear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the Loch Ness monster.

    1. Re:Drunken hunter is dark camo gear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the bigfoot said "I need about tree fiddy". Well it was about this time I realised that this"bigfoot" was about 8 stories tall and was a crustacean from the paleolithic era...

    2. Re: Drunken hunter is dark camo gear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ain't giving you know tree fiddy.

    3. Re:Drunken hunter is dark camo gear. by meerling · · Score: 1

      I saw it and the first thing that popped into my head was hiker. The second was that he was wearing dark clothes, and it was probably cold that morning.
      As to the blurry, way out of the focus range of that particular device as it was trained on the nest.

  6. Guerilla Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh... isn't it obvious? This is CarbonTV trying to drive traffic with a man in a hairy suit. Nothing more.

    1. Re:Guerilla Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Gorilla marketing?

    2. Re:Guerilla Marketing by imatter · · Score: 1

      They are beyond Gorilla, they've gone full Squatch!

    3. Re:Guerilla Marketing by k6mfw · · Score: 1

      This is CarbonTV trying to drive traffic with a man in a hairy suit.

      you may be on to something, I never heard of CarbonTV until now (and thousand other slashdotters that clicked the link).

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
  7. Bears can be bipedal by guruevi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not going to grant the ad revenue of the sensational video but 10 frames or ~.5-1s of noise can't confirm much but there are a lot of non-ape alternatives. Plenty of animals are bipedal for short periods of time.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wookies, for instance.

    2. Re:Bears can be bipedal by LordSkippy · · Score: 2

      Yes, bears can be bipedal for short distances. However, that definitely wasn't a bear. Person in dark clothing is most likely answer.

      --
      My karma is in a nose dive
    3. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Not going to grant the ad revenue of the sensational video but 10 frames or ~.5-1s of noise can't confirm much but there are a lot of non-ape alternatives. Plenty of animals are bipedal for short periods of time.

      The arms and legs are too long and it's motions too smooth to be a bear on two legs. It's almost certainly a hominin, with the most likely explanation being a person.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Tablizer · · Score: 0

      Some even dye their hair orange and run for president.

    5. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      You may not have watched the video but it's clearly bipedal. Bears can walk for short distances on their hind legs, but those legs are really short. This thing has legs that are like a human's - half the length of the body.

      It looks to me like a guy in some sort of suit, like a snow suit. He probably has no idea that he's Sasquatch.

      Michael

    6. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you haven't been to a circus, because you would have seen bears able to bicycle for more than a mere short distance.

    7. Re:Bears can be bipedal by LordSkippy · · Score: 1

      And you apparently haven't seen the video in question. Bear? No. Bigfoot? No. Person in dark clothing? Almost certainly.

      --
      My karma is in a nose dive
    8. Re:Bears can be bipedal by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Plenty of animals are bipedal for short periods of time

      Like people in ape suits?

    9. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I was bigfoot, I'd dress up as a clown so nobody would know it's me.


      Also, everybody knows bigfoot is always blurry because he only partially phases into our reality.
      Bigfoot's not real, he's SQRT(-real).

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    10. Re:Bears can be bipedal by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Some even dye their hair and run for president.

      While wearing colorful pantsuits.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    11. Re:Bears can be bipedal by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Bears can be quite bipedal, but this 'thing' grabbed a branch and swung on it. Seen a lot of bears, never seen them do that. When they want to go fast, they drop down on all fours.

      10 bitcoins on a clown in a hairy suit.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:Bears can be bipedal by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I'd dress up as Marco Rubio. Then everyone would ignore me.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be bigfoot, but how can you tell? It's obvious that you cannot see the creature's feet.

    14. Re:Bears can be bipedal by LordSkippy · · Score: 1

      Bears can be quite bipedal, but this 'thing' grabbed a branch and swung on it.

      If all it did was meander across the screen on two legs, then I'd say it could possibly be a bear. However, as you pointed out, the movements it makes rules a bear out.

      It didn't make any movement that would rule out a human walking around in the forest. So, I'd say your bitcoins are quite safe.

      --
      My karma is in a nose dive
    15. Re:Bears can be bipedal by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      15 quatloos it was someone who knew that there was a webcam up above and they dressed up as Bigfoot.

    16. Re:Bears can be bipedal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I doubt they'd jump like Bigfoot did at 0:46

    17. Re:Bears can be bipedal by guruevi · · Score: 1

      A picture at an angle and a lot of shadow (this was an eagle's nest so it must be relatively high) can mask the difference between something standing and going on all fours. Either way, it's not like humans don't go there (hence the camera), so a hunter or a military/militia training is an equally good answer.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  8. King Kong by npslider · · Score: 1

    Nothing to see here. It's just his little brother. They had a falling out a while back. Something about a gal named Nessie.

  9. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Fuck Trump AND Hillary .... Giant Meteor 2016!

  10. In other news...Killer Clowns !!! by ripvlan · · Score: 2

    Watch out for 'dem killer clowns too!!!

  11. Something clearly bipedal... by tomxor · · Score: 1

    The shadowy silhouette of something clearly bipedal makes its way through the stand of trees before walking out of frame.

    .... what like a human. When did this level of supernatural BS conspiracy nut reports get to be on slashdot, it's the opposite of science and technology. Maybe if it was a physiological study on these people it would actually be newsworthy.

  12. Not a bear by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bears do not walk like that. It's either a human in costume or an upright ape more closely related to humans than any currently existing ape.

    1. Re:Not a bear by npslider · · Score: 1

      Considering scientists are discovering new species every day... why not? I'm sure in due time there will be a picture of this species in all future Text Books, and students everywhere will despise having to remember the scientific name: Sasquatchis Footbigis

    2. Re:Not a bear by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?" --Sherlock Holmes

      It's a human.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Not a bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Considering scientists are discovering new species every day...

      Really? Are they discovering large mammals in Michigan every day? I must have missed ALL the announcements.

    4. Re:Not a bear by avandesande · · Score: 1

      It's Bruce Lee in a a Wookie suit.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re:Not a bear by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's definitely not a bear. Bears' forearms cannot swing back behind their body. It's a human or in the primate family.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    6. Re:Not a bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spy Handler couldn't possibly be wrong about how bears walk?

      Espionage agents are well-known to not answer the question, "Does a bear shit in the woods?" clearly proving their ignorance on furry matters.

    7. Re:Not a bear by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Spy Handler ( 822350 ) couldn't possibly be wrong about how bears walk?

      He could, but I've seen bears walk, and I agree with him.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Not a bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear legs also don't make up over 1/3rd of their overall body length/height. Definitely not a bear. My money would be on a hiker/hunter that's out scoping the area for next season.

    9. Re:Not a bear by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Watch the legs. You can see pant legs swinging back and forth as he moves, which skin-with-fur doesn't do. So it's a human in a furry costume.

      Pretty good job of trolling the camera, tho. Someone knew exactly what it's range and focus are, and where the nest wouldn't interfere.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:Not a bear by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      It's a human or in the primate family.

      Definitely a Wookie then. And yes, I know that Wookies are from a galaxy far far away and long ago, so it is impossible for them to be related to primates at all. Probably don't even have mitochondria.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  13. This story was MADE for Slashdot! by npslider · · Score: 1

    Who better to believe in Big Foot than a group of basement dwellers that have never seen real trees, the sun, or a shower.

  14. A guy by bettodavis · · Score: 1

    In a furry suit, trolling us. Next topic, please.

    1. Re:A guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should seriously consider that it may be an actual, bona fide TROLL!

    2. Re:A guy by mark-t · · Score: 1

      where do you get the idea that he's wearing a costume or suit? It could easily just be dark clothing. Looks to me like a person wearing a black hoodie, which would obscure much of his face unless he were to look in the direction of the camera, above.

  15. /. Comments are good reading by Krojack · · Score: 1

    I come to /. just to read the hate comments anymore. They give me a good laugh. I could care less about anything else.

    1. Re:/. Comments are good reading by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

      *couldn't*

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re: /. Comments are good reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you could definitely care less, and - therefore - you do, indeed, care?

      Tell me: why do you care?

      Scratch that, I couldn't care less.

  16. Slashdot by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember back when it was "Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff That Matters"

    Now it seems it's ever trending towards "Slashdot: News for Morons, Inane Bullshit"

    1. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confusing /. with FoxNews.com

    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're confusing /. with FoxNews.com

      The summary links to Fox and provides less information.

    3. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think it's the editors who are doing that. Maybe Dice wasn't so bad after all.

    4. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well this was posted there too, so...

    5. Re:Slashdot by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because what nerds *really* want is to read an earnest exegesis of their subculture by Jon Katz.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Splashplop: News for turds, Stuff that splatters.

    7. Re:Slashdot by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're exactly right. Because it's not like Slashdot has ever had a Bigfoot story back in its heyday.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
  17. It was me guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry I haven't shaved recently. Or bathed. Or changed my clothes.

    I am totally not BigFoot, and you should pay no attention to this video, and go about your business.

    1. Re:It was me guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow! you haven't changed your clothes in so long that they have grown fungus? I applaud your dedication Sir or Madam!

  18. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by npslider · · Score: 1

    Big Foot does not have many friends. All of them suck at taking pictures. Plain and simple. He's too old to know about 'selfies'.

  19. Seriously, Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell is this crap on /.?

    1. Re:Seriously, Slashdot? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Because "webcam".

  20. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blurry.
    From a distance.
    Inconclusive.
    No follow up, other evidence, etc.

    Like every UFO, ghost, loch ness monster or other story: It's BOLLOCKS until you actually have something worth showing.

    There are entire tribes that have only been contacted by modern civilisation in the last few years. They are places in the ocean that we've never been to. We barely understand how many planets there are in our own solar system, let alone anyone else's.

    But the more BOLLOCKS like this that appears as "news" or even a funny, the more idiots confuse "open scepticism and probability" with "acceptance of absolute shite as fact".

    I can't even work out why this is on here, why it's worthy of a submission, why it passed moderation, or why I'm seeing it at all.

    Stop it.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blurry.
      From a distance.
      Inconclusive.
      No follow up, other evidence, etc.

      In the wrong f*ing region of the country.

      Seriously, when you think about Bigfoot, you're talking about the Pacific Northwest, *not* the Lower Peninsula of Michigan. The Cascades and the Rockies are remote enough that you can handwave about isolated pockets of 6-foot tall crypto-primtes, but Michigan? The Lower Peninsula of Michigan? Sure, the northern regions are rather rural and forested, but really? Take a look at a map of the area: There's county roads criss-crossing the area every mile or so, and there's a bunch of houses scattered in there.

      If there was a breeding population of Bigfeet in the area, why are we only getting a fuzzy picture of one now? Shouldn't there have been some interaction before now?

    2. Re:Sigh. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Before you can even begin to say that a certain crypted exists you have to examine the evidence and determine if such a creature can exist. I have devised several questions that I asked myself about such creatures before I put forth any effort to believe them. If the answer is 'no' to any of the following questions then said creature probably doesn't exist. But just because you can answer yes to all the questions only allows for the possibility for the creature to exist. I doesn't prove it does.

      Can the creature exist without violating the laws of physics or biology?

      A couple of examples of this are Batsquatch and the famous chupacabra. Batsquatch, a large Bigfoot like animals that flies around with big bat like wings. Violates the laws of physics, doesn't exist. Chupacabra, a crypted that lives only on the blood of goats. Blood alone doesn't contain enough nutrients to sustain a creature of its reported size. Violates the laws of biology, doesn't exist.

      Where the two most well-known crypteds, Bigfoot and the lochness monster on this question are like this. Bigfoot is really only a big ass hairy monkey which doesn't violate any natural laws. Loch Ness Monster, such creatures have existed in the prehistoric past. No reason they can'y exist today.

      Is there credible circumstantial evidence for the creature to exist? Are there credible eyewitnesses, footprints, credible photos, and or remains?

      In the case of batsquatch? Really? How many of you have ever heard of batsquatch before this posting? In the case of the chupacabra, there lots of witnesses that saw something, most don't agree on the same animal. There is evidence of attacks on farm animals but most of those can written off as known animals. There is even a short film of what looks like a shaved dog to me running.

      In the case of Bigfoot there reliable witnesses, foot prints, some film stock that can't be completely ruled out. There is other body prints and 1 or 2 large piles of shit. If Bigfoot was a murder trial based on circumstantial evidence along we would have had a hanging a long time ago.

      In the case of the lochness monster, there is some witnesses and pictures, of something. Most of which can be explained by perfectly natural creatures or events.

      Is there a entry in the fossil record for a creature similar or related to said cryptid?

      In the case of batsquatch and the chupacabra, no there isn't any such records.

      In the case of Bigfoot we have Gigantopithecus. In the case of Nessie, we have the Plesiosaurus.

      Can the creatures reported habitat sustain a large enough population while keeping it mostly hidden.

      Batsquatch, nobody knows the real habitat of this cryptid. It has been seen only a few times in a very small area. Chubracabra, well there are lots of goats out there to suck on, so who knows.

      As for lochness, well while the loch is big, it isn't big enough to sustain a large enough breeding population of creatures this size. The loch is also poor in nutrients so it probably can't sustain even a small number of creatures. Sorry, Nessie but you probably don't exist.

      Only in the case of Bigfoot is all the requirements of this question positive. Most cases and sightings are in the North American North West. There is millions of square miles to hide and sustain colonies of these creatures. There is large stocks of fish and other game if they are meat eaters. If they are not, there is plenty of grasses, plants, and roots too.

      While this doesn't prove that there is a large unknown hairy ape roaming the country. It certainly does allow for the possibility.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  21. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe it's Donald Trump in the bigfoot costume? Big foot, small hands!

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  22. Quit your bitching by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    This story got /. through one whole page of comments without a single mention of the Second Amendment.

    Well, until now of course.

    1. Re:Quit your bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the point of that would be ??? Merica .... we hazumz?

    2. Re:Quit your bitching by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      But we need our guns to shoot bigfoots.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:Quit your bitching by twotacocombo · · Score: 1

      That sounds like something Hitler would have said.

    4. Re:Quit your bitching by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      As native born US citizens, BigFoots have the right to a gun and the right to shoot back.

    5. Re:Quit your bitching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story got /. through one whole page of comments without a single mention of the Second Amendment.

      Well, until now of course.

      Is this the first example of Charlton Hestons law? That it is only a matter of time before someone manipulates a thread to mention the 2nd amendment?

    6. Re:Quit your bitching by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read a little something called THE SECOND AMENDMENT, you commie!

      A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State from the threat of bigfoots, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    7. Re:Quit your bitching by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      But that was written back when darkies and bigfoots were only considered 0.6 of a normal human defined as pasty white (non-jewish) male property owner. As per amendment now they have right to vote, collect social security, be free to worship BigFooter Jeebzuz and be part of the militia

    8. Re:Quit your bitching by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      This country's gone to hell, and that's why I'm voting Trump.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  23. Talking into frame by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

    What did he say?

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  24. Bigfoot by kwiecmmm · · Score: 3, Funny

    "They typically dwell just behind rocks, but are also sometimes playful bounding into thick fogs and out of focus areas."

    Unfortunately this is on Slashdot for some stupid reason, but that doesn't mean I can't mock the story with a good Futurama reference.

    "Bigfoot is a crucial part of the ecosystem, if he exists. So lets all help keep possibly Bigfoot alive for future generations to enjoy, unless he doesn't exist."

    1. Re:Bigfoot by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      I'm more amused by the bigfoot hunter TV shows talking like they know WTF this animal that's never been directly observed does. "'Squaches are known for their large nests consisting of ..." and "A 'Squaches mating call sounds like..."

      Yea, lets just spread the ignorance nationwide.

  25. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    He doesn't have a selfie stick. Lots of other kinds of sticks, but no selfie stick.

  26. Richard, no no by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Tell RMS to get back to work and stop messin' with the birdies.
     

  27. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    I have many selfies from back in the 80's.

  28. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

    We should start a GoFundMe to buy Bigfoot a selfie stick.

  29. A viable 3rd party at last by npslider · · Score: 4, Funny

    Write-in BigFoot-Nessie 2016.

    Change we CAN'T believe in!

  30. Just before it hops over a log... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    near the end just before it hops over a log and disappears into the shadows, it has it's "back" turned to the camera, and it looks like it's wearing a dark grey backpack.

    1. Re: Just before it hops over a log... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a silverback Bigfoot. The silverback is used to attact mates.

    2. Re:Just before it hops over a log... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that it's BigFoot disguised as a human wearing a backpack. In fact, after I've watched the video again I find that pretty obvious.

    3. Re: Just before it hops over a log... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      specifically, it's a Granite Gear brand Silverback Bigfoot

  31. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by npslider · · Score: 1

    He needs a new phone first. His Blackberry is on it's last legs.

  32. That's no Big Foot.... by gti_guy · · Score: 1

    that's a Creepy Clown! Notify Homeland Security and CNN!!

  33. Obligatory Mitch Hedberg by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. Run, he's fuzzy, get out of here.

  34. GentlemAn, not gentlemen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ONE bigfoot, yah?

  35. It's Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obviously the zombie Steve Jobs looking for his lost AirPods.

  36. definitely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is definitely a bigfoot.

  37. Mitch Hedberg by Major+Blud · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I think Bigfoot is blurry. There's a large out-of-focus monster terrorizing the Pacific Northwest" --Mitch Hedberg

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  38. Human. Obviously. by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    Its clearly a human, and one not even used to walking round the forest. Look at the awkward way he jumps off a small log around 0:40.

    As to being all black and possibly hairy, I'd suggest thats entirely down to poor lighting/camera resolution/compression artefacts.

    1. Re:Human. Obviously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've known hairy goths before, and in these days of big hipster beards there's even more chance of a black, hairy hominid. Being outside in the fresh air might preclude goths, though.

    2. Re:Human. Obviously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. If I saw this footage without hearing or reading the name "Bigfoot" associated with it, I would have just thought, "someone's walking around down there." If someone later had suggested it might be Bigfoot, I would have laughed, then maybe taken another look at the video in this new context. Then I would have said, "Yeah, if I tilt my head just right and squint a little, I guess I can see how it might kind of look like Bigfoot."

      Seriously, that's just a guy walking around down there. I don't even think he's trying to prank anyone, because he's clearly not trying to imitate the Bigfoot stride from the classic video. For all I know, it's a technician coming to check on the camera. The very existence of the camera is proof that this is a location that someone has come before, and pretty strong evidence that they're going to come back at some point. In other words, this is an area traveled by humans. If I see a video of something that may be human or may be Bigfoot, guess which one I'm going to put my money on.

    3. Re:Human. Obviously. by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      >The very existence of the camera is proof that this is a location that someone has come before

      The very existence of ads on the web site for the camera shows a commercial incentive to make up bigfoot stories to drive traffic.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    4. Re:Human. Obviously. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Haha, yes, I had the same thought...it's probably someone from the outfit that owns the camera. (Watch the legs.... pants.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  39. Dana Gould by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Funny how after everyone had phones with cameras, the number of UFO sightings really dropped off."

    1. Re:Dana Gould by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Can you cite the source. I would enjoy knowing that your statement is true.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  40. This monsters really exists... by fbobraga · · Score: 2

    It's written on the Biblie!

  41. Hey I caught big foot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  42. Bullshit! He wasn't there today! by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

    I know that's not Bigfoot. I saw him earlier today chillin' with Elvis at the Burger King.

    1. Re:Bullshit! He wasn't there today! by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 3, Funny

      I saw Bigfoot drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.

      His hair was perfect.

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    2. Re:Bullshit! He wasn't there today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you must be from Eerie, IN.

    3. Re:Bullshit! He wasn't there today! by hey! · · Score: 1

      That wasn't Elvis, it was D.B. Cooper.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Bullshit! He wasn't there today! by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I moved there from Kalamazoo, MI.

  43. Quick! Someone get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....Steve Austin and Jamie Sommers to get the nuclear device to Bigfoot so he can throw it into the lava to prevent the upcoming earthquake!

  44. That's a line technician by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frontier Communications tech following up on reports of eagle cam internet outage.

  45. poor balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    evidently bigfoot has poor balance. notice he has to grab the tree/branch next to him when he gets up on the log? would a real bigfoot really have to do that. he also seems to be hamming it up a little with the excessive arm movements. what a douche...

  46. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > Maybe it's Donald Trump in the bigfoot costume?

    You mean there is a difference? :-)

    *ba dum tsh*

  47. I need Tree Fiddty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need Tree Fiddty so I can give it to the Lock Ness Monster. He won't leave me alone!

    -Bigfoot

  48. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by Potor · · Score: 1

    Somebody got their coastocoastam in my /.

  49. Would somebody please shut off by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

    the Infinite Improbability Drive before the elections? Thanks.

  50. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    There was this story from about 12 years ago. Unfortunately the linked article is no longer available but I did find a follow up that has a more "current" one. The dino has survived until at least 2014 but I didn't find anything newer than that.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  51. Has anyone seen Richard Stallman recently? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice how nobody has ever seen Richard Stallman and Bigfoot in the same room at the same time. Coincidence or conspiracy?

    1. Re:Has anyone seen Richard Stallman recently? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      There are slight differences, Bigfoot does harbor nor eat toe cheese.

  52. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Same Same, but Different.

  53. The obvious answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Are they discovering large mammals in Michigan every day?

    Of course they are! Have you even been inside a Wal-Mart lately?

  54. There is No Sasquatch - The Evidence is Clear by crunchygranola · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although the catch phrase "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is often repeated, it is fundamentally nonsense - unless elaborately qualified.

    If you thoroughly search a room looking for a suspect, and do not find him or her, you know they are not in the space searched. Absence of evidence can obviously be extremely strong evidence of absence if you have effective tools to look for the evidence.

    We now have the equivalent situation with respect to "Sasquatch".

    With the advent of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring, a technology that has been available now for nearly 20 years, it is possible to survey the animals present in an environment, without ever seeing them, by detecting the traces of DNA they inevitably leave behind. When you consider forensic DNA analysis, analyzing the traces of DNA left on most any object you interact with, the technique is almost 30 years old. No one has ever detected the DNA of an unknown non-human primate in North America.

    All of the Sasquatch "evidence" - footprints, disturbed areas, supposed feeding or gathering spots, claimed coprolites, etc. would be loaded with Sasquatch DNA if it was real. Nope, no Sasquatch DNA anywhere. At this point we can close the book on the theory that there is, or has ever been, a Sasquatch.

    --
    Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    1. Re:There is No Sasquatch - The Evidence is Clear by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      "At this point we can close the book on the theory that there is, or has ever been, a Sasquatch. "

      Sure, we could, but what fun would that be?

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    2. Re: There is No Sasquatch - The Evidence is Clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goonigoogoo.

  55. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by ausekilis · · Score: 2

    I knew a guy that removed his license plate from his sport bike and dropped trow before blazing by a speeding camera at 110 mph. Somehow I don't think that's quite what you mean.

  56. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    Nah, hair is all wrong.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  57. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by sl3xd · · Score: 2
    --
    -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  58. Clown by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Given it's the woods, it's most likely a clown.

  59. Re:Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by hattable · · Score: 1

    Thailand?

    --
    OMG facts!
  60. Shoot him! by burni2 · · Score: 1

    I want proof!

    SARKASM ALERT, if you would dare to shoot in the woods or anywhere else on a bipedal creature just4fun or "proof", the only legal way you should use a gun is:
    a.) on yourself
    b.) to compete for the darwin award.

  61. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1
  62. Sorry by Zalbik · · Score: 1

    That was me, sorry.

    And yes, I am hairy and blurry in real life.

  63. I heard Bigfoot by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    on 271.000 MHz, callword for NORAD Western Area Defense Sector. Rambled off a bunch of numbers, probably where a Air Guard F16 to meet for refueling. Getting back to the big scary monster, this is some interesting footage but hope it is not a plant to get BF hunters all excited. I pretty much dismiss all this BF stuff because such hunters do lots of emotional drama and promotional buildup but never deliver the goods. Incredible footage by wildlife from photogs and videographers good for nature programs comes at very high cost. These people have to be very rugged, spend months in the wilderness, very good equipment and broadcast quality technique, and at best get 10 minutes of footage good enough to show on PBS Nature. i.e, the snow leopard where one of them suffered illness that after he is no longer strong enough to go back out into the wilderness. However the Big Foot hunters would never put up with this endurance like what SEALs put up with, but they sure know how to deliver emotional drama!

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  64. total frickin hoax! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    that was no eagle, it was a pigeon in a Halloween costume in the nest. Bigfoot probably is playing a hoax on us.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    1. Re: total frickin hoax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it wasn't a clown. *shudder*

  65. Re: Anonymous Coward Spotted Getting First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Bigfoot is wearing a Trump costume and Trump has been dead for years.

  66. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    I have selfies going back to the 1960s, way before cell phones. You can take a "selfie" with any kind of camera. Back then my camera didn't have the delayed shutter release that my DSLR has, so I had to hold it out at arm's length. Still worked!

  67. "lumbering figure talking into frame" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's talking then why does anyone think it's not human?

  68. Could be a bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When bears walk on hind legs they look freaky.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcIkQaLJ9r8

  69. Where is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Art Bell when we need him?

  70. In other, unrelated, news... by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 1

    Someone accessed Lord Lucan's bank account yesterday at the Central State Bank in the small town of Beulah, Michigan, USA.

    Wait... isn't Beulah near the Platte River State Fish Hatchery?

  71. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Extended shutter releases were common. Used for long exposures, so you didn't shake the camera. They also worked for selfies.

  72. What is this garbage footage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Patterson Gimlin Film looks like 4K video in comparison

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e-8FeEEo-8

  73. Re:Explained...by a dude who knows there's a webca by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

    Now that brings joy to my heart. I didn't get a link to their web cam when I did my search. Sometimes the world just needs to be a little weirder but I don't recommend bobcats.

    --
    Time to offend someone
  74. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can capture high res video of cops killing people, high speed chances, the sun, stars exploding billions of light years away... but never, not once with all the tech in the world can we get one NON blurry pic of bigfoot.... yah... right.