Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Permanently Discontinues Galaxy Note 7 (twitter.com)

After the replacement units of Galaxy Note 7 also started to catch fire, Samsung is now permanently discontinuing its latest flagship smartphone (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled; alternate source), the company said today. The news comes a day after Samsung halted sales of Note 7 once again and began asking users to return the device. So far nearly 50 incidents of Note 7 causing fires have been reported. More importantly, many people have been physically injured with their new Galaxy phone catching fire. WSJ reports: Samsung said in a filing with South Korean regulators on Tuesday that it would permanently cease sales of the device, a day after it announced a temporary halt to production of the smartphones. "Taking our customer's safety as our highest priority, we have decided to halt sales and production of the Galaxy Note 7," the company said. The move comes on a day when Samsung shares tumbled 8%, its biggest one-day decline in eight years, amid increasing pressure after a new string of reported smartphone fires in the U.S.

14 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. This is not even the most hilarious news by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US CPSC has asked consumers to power down all Samsung Galaxy Note 7 phones, whether original or replacement. As in, permanently.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Why the hate? by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok I admit that I use iOS devices more than android. But why the hate towards Samsung with the good riddance.
    I would much rather see them fix the phone so it's users will have a nice safe phone. Vs what it would be now a possibility exploding collectors item. That in 20 years you can sell to a collector for about a grand.

    Samsung has been pushing the quality of Android phones. They are no longer cheap Apple rip offs but their own phone market. Where Apple has to take notice and the competition impress their phone as well.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Why the hate? by TwentyCharsIsNotEnou · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That in 20 years you can sell to a collector for about a grand.

      It costs almost a grand today!!

  3. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not a dupe. The previous story talked about Samsung halting sales of Note 7. The company has since changed its stand on the matter. Please read before commenting.

  4. I cared enough to post this by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    I could care less, but then I wouldn't have posted at all.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  5. Re:Sad by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kind of funny how people call Apple users "worshippers" and "fanboys" while at the same time pretending Samsung's exploding phones are just a minor problem that people shouldn't make such a fuss about, on the same level as a touch display glitch.

    Worshipping Samsung a little too much, perhaps?

  6. Re:Sad by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if they are unwilling to make a phone with user replaceable battery, serves them right. this could have been so much cheaper for them.

  7. Re:Damn by SlovakWakko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quality control, firmware responsible for charging - these can be easily changed. I think it has to be a serious design error which cannot be repaired without physically altering the case/PCB. Like a chip which gets hot under certain conditions is located too close to the battery, or something similar.

  8. Re: Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Get some perspective man.

    Samsung's phones are a health hazard. They could kill you.

    Apples touch disease, though unnaceptable from a consumer point of view, falls squarely in the domain of "first world problems". They won't kill you. They won't harm you. They'll just cause you a slight annoyance (having to ask Apple for a replacement, which, depending on specifics, they might do for free).

    Also, the instances of Apple devices catching fire are extremely rare, and are caused by mishandling the device (like, for example, using some crap charger).

    Samsung's instances are caused by a defect that they themselves have already admitted existing. Though they haven't exactly clarified what they've fucked up, leaving people - such as yourself - a thin hope that it might just be a bad batch of batteries, totally ignoring that a) replacing the batteries didn't fix the problem and b) that there are only a handful of battery suppliers, and they supply everyone else.

    A manufacturing defect on the batteriez would not just affect Samsung devices, they would affect everyone's devices.

  9. Re:Interesting by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who are you accusing of hating here? The Wall Street Journal for publishing this article? Samsung for discontinuing the model? Or maybe msmash for submitting the story here?

    Is this not a newsworthy topic? Is this not a current red-hot issue in the tech world? Is this not news for nerds?

    How is it that you think that this is a political issue, or one driven by hate? Do you think that we should meekly accept phones that explode on us? You accuse others of being fanbois, but I can't think of any excuse to wanting us to remain silent on this issue other than you being a fanboi yourself.

  10. Re: Damn by slack_justyb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm doubtful that "heads will roll". The manufacturing process is a risky one and higher ups usually accept a level of risk. As for the problem itself, last I heard it was a defect in the entire process. The case itself shrinks and expands with usage. The battery wasn't sized properly. The pressure fitting can produce jagged edges from the expanding and contacting. Additionally the positive and negative ends are incredibly close on the battery. So the idea I've heard is that the expanding and contacting case eventually produces jagged edges on the pressure plate which cause shorts in the battery. Again that's just what I've heard, but it sounds like a failure from the ground up.

  11. Re:Sad by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's totally legitimate to contrast the pooh-poohing of Samsung completely abandoning a flagship product over safety problems with how Slashdot would be reacting if this were Apple

  12. Re:Sad by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Moderating this as flamebait is silly. Having a user-replaceable battery is a desirable feature, at least for me.

  13. Re:cool link by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Editor's note: Submitters and editors should note that it is best to open a private browsing window and manually remove session ID gobblegook from URL to test a link. Greetz BugMeNot, works sometimes.

    For small pocket devices WE HAVE EXCEEDED PEAK LI-ON BATTERY AREA and especially LENGTH. Samsung should retool the G7 to contain two or three smaller 'proven' Lion battery packages with separate charging circuits. It is possible that a manufacturing variance ultimately related to area is fooling the charge circuit and making these more susceptible to overcharge. There is also physical stress, another trigger. Batteries should not straddle the middle of the device where the most butt-pocket deformation will occur.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>