Slashdot Mirror


Russia Today: NatWest To Close Russian Channel's UK Bank Accounts (bbc.com)

According to the editor-in-chief of state-run broadcaster Russia Today (RT), NatWest bank froze its account. Margarita Simonyan said, "They've closed our accounts in Britain. All our accounts. 'The decision is not subject to review.' Praise be to freedom of speech!" The Guardian adds: Russia has angrily accused Britain of trampling on freedom of speech after NatWest said it was closing down the bank accounts of the Kremlin TV channel Russia Today (RT). Russian MPs, the foreign ministry and human rights officials all condemned the move, and said the UK government was guilty of violating press freedom and of double standards. Simonyan said she had received a letter out of the blue from NatWest saying that it was pulling the plug on the broadcaster's accounts from mid-December. "We have recently undertaken a review of your banking arrangements with us and reached the conclusion that we will no longer provide these facilities," it said.

131 comments

  1. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about all this before. Of course, then it was East Germany and the KGB doing it...

  2. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Fragnet · · Score: 1, Troll

    RT is the KGB, by another name. Don't kid yourself.

  3. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RT may be run by the Russian interests, but its about as close to the KGB as CNN is close to the CIA

  4. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Rei · · Score: 1
    --
    The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
  5. For those wondering... by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... while the focus in the US has been more about the hacking of the DNC and similar stories, if I had to wager, I'd guess that this is part of the new sanctions threatened against Russia by John Kerry and Boris Johnson over the bombing of Aleppo.

    --
    The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
    1. Re: For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess it is about shutting down one of the few news services not editing in apologetics for Clinton

    2. Re:For those wondering... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      If it were Bank of America, sure. But it's Natwest, a UK bank, which has no US connections (at all, it's owned by Bank of Scotland, which in turn is a Crown property. And before you ask - no, that doesn't mean the UK government has any say in it, Crown properties like the BoS are run at arm's length from the government.)

      That said, I'll be interested to follow how this pans out. Will they get another account at another bank? Will other banks in other countries pull their accounts? Is this really a political decision, or could it just be that RT is a bad customer for some reason?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:For those wondering... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      ... while the focus in the US has been more about the hacking of the DNC and similar stories, if I had to wager, I'd guess that this is part of the new sanctions threatened against Russia by John Kerry and Boris Johnson over the bombing of Aleppo.

      The focus in the US has hardly touched the DNC hacking, if the American versions of RT - CNN, MSNBC, NBC et al are anything to go by. It's all been about women coming out of the woodwork to accuse Trump of doing something a decade or more ago.

    4. Re:For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American version of RT is Radio Free Europe, Radio Free Asia, etc.

      If you really think the US corporate media is just like RT, then either you don't know how they operate, or you don't know very much about RT.

    5. Re:For those wondering... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, the timing is suspiciously coincidental. But if it *is* a US covert sanction, it makes you wonder exactly how it was worked.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:For those wondering... by Xest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, this is part of a change to UK banking law. It occured a couple of years ago and it's effected all sorts of people and organisations including MPs themselves - the law of unintended consequences and all that.

      Basically, the law now allows for banks to be held culpable if they facilitate money laundering, and as such banks have started pursuing a zero risk approach to the topic. Therefore everything from charities merely accused of corruption, funding terrorism and so forth, through to MPs that engage with corrupt foreign leaders even if simply engaging on political fact finding missions have had their and even their families bank accounts shutdown.

      This is merely a continuance of that, Russia is basically the global capital of corruption. Given the rise of the many billionaire oligarchs post-soviet era I'm amazed it's actually taken the banks this long to decide that supplying banking for the a Russian government run organisation is too risky.

      So no conspiracy theories are really necessary, nor would they make any sense. When the same law is resulting in MPs and their wives, kids, and grandmothers having their bank accounts closed down as it is RT it's a complete nonsense to suggest anything nefarious is going on. It really is just about a private company choosing to play it overly safe in the face of a change in the law.

      Given the impact on MPs themselves, I'd be surprised if this particular law change lasts long at all. I believe this also enshrined into law US overreach too, as my father who has never had any link to, nor ever been to the US was asked to prove he was not a US citizen (I don't know how you prove you're not a US citizen, I can imagine how you prove you are one) and avoiding paying taxes whilst living overseas under the FATCA regulations. It rather sickens me that my father had to provide information on his personal finances as a British citzen to the US authorities to allow them to decide if he's evading American taxes or not when he's got nothing to do with America or face having his bank account shutdown in a similar manner.

      Yeah, so long story short, basically they've gone over the top in trying to crackdown on fraud and tax evasion and everyone and their dog (probaby literally) in the UK is being hit right now. On the scale of organisations deserving to be hit by this law though because of probable real actual corruption I'd say RT is pretty high up the list relative to all the people who really are unquestionably innocent and are also suffering the same fate.

      Really, despite all the rhetoric from Russia about censorship, sanctions and such there genuinely is no such story here. It's entirely about our banking regulations currently having been made a complete ass.

    7. Re:For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Crown properties like the BoS are run at arm's length from the government

      In theory.

      In practice the government will make it clear if there is something they want done, and will not leave a paper trail.

    8. Re:For those wondering... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Really? When did they get to set up shop in Russia? Oh, that didn't happen? Guess it's not quite the same then.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    9. Re:For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HSBC gets found guilty of embezzling or corruption an average of what, 4 times a year, every year? Wells Fargo looks like saints compared to British banks.

    10. Re:For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In practice the Illuminati tells the US government who tells the trilateral commission who tells the NSA who tells the UK government who tells SPECTRE who tells MI6 who tells the BBC who tells the Milk Marketing Board who tells the Queen who tells the Bank of Scotland to break the law and do something for political reasons.

    11. Re: For those wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but that just makes you an idiot

  6. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    its about as close to the KGB as CNN is close to the CIA

    That doesn't like much of a stretch. We all have our lapdog press.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  7. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    You mean it belongs to the Belarus government?

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  8. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't that his point?

  9. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No one said Russia is a bastion of free speech, but the hyperbole of the "RT is the KGB" is absurd,

    The KGB did A LOT More horrible shit than produce media with a pro-russian spin, i'm sick of stupid people constantly trying to make a point by finding the most extreme parallel they can imagine and then declaring confidently as if its fact..

  10. Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Propaganda is supposed to be protected speech? Cool, let me open a new TV-station in Russia then..

    1. Re:Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you don't like what is being said doesn't mean they don't have the right to say it.

    2. Re: Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      oh good another clever comment about the election, how original.

    3. Re:Pravda by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Oh, by that standard, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS and a whole bunch of US channels that are openly rooting for Clinton should be treated the same way as RT. If RT is the mouthpiece of Vladimir Putin, these channels carry the water for Clinton and Obama.

    4. Re:Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can open a TV station in Russia. Many TV stations in Russia are owned by Western media companies. Disney, Time Warner etc.... But they are all cable channels. What you can't do in Russia is start an over the air channel. Over the air broadcasts are state only. Start as many cable channels in Russia as you like, bro.

    5. Re:Pravda by unixisc · · Score: 1

      How different is that from the US? If you don't have cable, there are just a handful of over the air channels - maybe 10 or so. One of them - PBS, while not government controlled but definitely government funded, is permanently Leftist. The others, while not government funded, are permanently Leftist as well.

    6. Re:Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, I have traveled overseas to the far East of China, and here is what you all need to understand.

      IN NORMAL TIMES OF PEACE
      =========== :RUSSIA
      CNN tells the truth.
      RT tells propaganda. :AMERICA
      CNN tells propaganda.
      RT tells the truth.

      CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NPR, PRI, BBC are all under control of western government, just like RT is under control of Russian government.

      A communication disruption on them will happen in Russia and China if it hasn't already.

    7. Re:Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think everything on the air or on PBS is leftist it says more about you then it does them.

    8. Re:Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Surely you don't think US media is allowed to operate unfettered in Russia or China? If you do, you are very ignorant about the state of affairs.

      RT takes direct orders from the Russia government. It is not at all comparable to corporate media (except in the fantasies of Russian propagandists with their endless whataboutism).

      But the US really does have an equivalent to RT that's targeted at Russia, it's called Radio Free Europe: http://www.rferl.org/

      There's also Radio Free Asia: http://www.rfa.org/

      Take a look at those and get an idea of what real pro-western propaganda looks like. Then go look at RT for a while, and you'll begin to understand how those propaganda sites really are the mirror image of RT. Then you can begin to appreciate how the major media in the West are much more open, nuanced and honest than either one.

    9. Re:Pravda by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Leftist in US terms means centrist in the rest of the world. There is no real left in the US. Travel a bit and you'll get it. So from the outside it looks like US media are centrist. Apart from Fox.

    10. Re:Pravda by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Yes. Propaganda is protected speech. As are a lot of other things you might dislike.

    11. Re:Pravda by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      yes it is in the western world, it is also a pretty huge double standard given the amount of propaganda western governments pump through the press as well.. Just because you don't like what they say is irrelevant. Russia supposedly has freedom of press too, but you are likely to get harassed or found to have breached some law to allow them to shut you down should you try what you propose. I guess that is what you want to happen here too? our governments dictating what the press can say?

    12. Re:Pravda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like that's already happened. Just plain 'ol corruption, no totalitarianism needed.

    13. Re:Pravda by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      yes it has happened quite a bit, that doesn't mean it is something to support. When spotted it needs to be called out and fought against "regardless" of whether you agree with the message being delivered.

  11. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by guestapoo · · Score: 2

    Talk about CNN, I see funny when CNN edited an interview with RT's Anissa Naouai, in which CNN’s Amanpour definitely planted to show her "guest" is a fool. Forget about "freedom ranking", I saw here is Anissa was much more open, transparent and smarter than Amanpour.

  12. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    You mean it belongs to the Belarus government?

    Belarus has KDB rather than KGB, state in Belarussian is "dzyerzhava" as opposed to [red] Russian "gosudarstvo". But then, Lukashenko hardly even knows Belarussian...

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  13. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Funny

    i'm sick of stupid people constantly trying to make a point by finding the most extreme parallel they can imagine and then declaring confidently as if its fact..

    Damn right! Those people are literally Hitler!

  14. Why do they even have a UK bank account? by Nutria · · Score: 1

    To pay the people in their London bureau?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Why do they even have a UK bank account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.
      And now you can expect that the BBC will have its Russian bank accounts closed, and have a hard time paying its staff stationed there.

    2. Re:Why do they even have a UK bank account? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The BBC manufactures its own news nowadays. They don't need people in Russia or anywhere else.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Why do they even have a UK bank account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, someone doesnt like the news so they blame the messenger.

    4. Re:Why do they even have a UK bank account? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      No I blame the messenger when the "news" he gives me is a lie.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Why do they even have a UK bank account? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      So you do blame RT then. Because if you've ever watched it for any length of time, you'd know that broadcasts nothing but anti-western stories. There is literally nothing of general interest, and every story has a pro-Russian taint to it. And while some of those stories are true, many are not. And while CNN and others have their own "taints", they're nowhere near as slanted. You'll frequently hear stories not in a positive light about western politics and culture. Complete apples and oranges, so don't even try to claim they're equivalent.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    6. Re:Why do they even have a UK bank account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never watched RT but I've read their newpapers. It's all soft propaganda puff pieces about fuzzy baby zoo animals or gifted Russian school children, with a bit of mythologisng Putin thrown in. They hardly acknowledge geopolitics even exists.

  15. Re:Round 1, begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope so.

    It'd just be too shameful if some future civilization from space visited our irradiated wasteland of Earth, and reported back... "Apparently, there was a group called the 'DNC' that did a culture-wide ad hominem fallacy of blaming 'Russians' for some embarrassing facts being facts, and the attempts to add political weight to the fallacy escalated to nuclear annihilation of the planet".

  16. Well, I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some shit is too stinky even for the banking industry.

    Who knew.

  17. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody mentioned Hitler, yet

  18. Re:Any day now by Rei · · Score: 2

    A regional power with ~8k nuclear weapons. At least with the current administration, fear of conflict with this "regional power" has bound their hands pretty well.

    There's no signs that Russia is going to "collapse any day now". It's not exactly on a positive trend, and remains fraught with demographic problems including large numbers of people who don't consider themselves Russian (or consider themselves Russian only second to some other category). And indeed they're playing with fire by, for example, using money to prop up strongmen like Kadyrov who have their own private militaries to try to keep peace in restive areas. But as for signs of any sort of "imminent" collapse, I just don't see it. Russia mains good control over the domestic messaging, and until the pocketbook starts contradicting too much with the message on TV, they'll maintain control.

    --
    The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
  19. Hypocrisy at its best by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Russia has angrily accused Britain of trampling on freedom of speech

    As if Putin, and thereby extension Russia, knows what freedom of speech is.

    If Russia is so worried about freedom of speech then perhaps they should start at home by allowing all those opposition and independent news organizations they keep investigating and shutting down to reopen. Lead by example.

    The same would go for the Tartar news and radio organizations they've shut down since they've taken over Crimea from Ukraine rather than putting locks on the doors and imprisoning Tartars who run those organizations.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Hypocrisy at its best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be nice if, just once, we had a government with the balls to say publicly "Who the fuck do you think you're kidding Mr. Putin?"

    2. Re:Hypocrisy at its best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russians absolutely have freedom of speech on Internet. You can also watch CNN all you like.

  20. conspiratards were right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the conspiracy nuts saying something like this was going to happen over a year ago. It sounded insane at the time, you can't just shut down a media outlet in a western country, but now it's actually happening. If they're correct about everything, then an internet crackdown is next.

  21. UK denies involvement by bytesex · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:UK denies involvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite likely.

      It is probably the US, if RBS/Natwest want to operate in the US they have to cooperate with the US govt. This means not hosting accounts for anything the US finds dodgy.

    2. Re:UK denies involvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be true then.

    3. Re:UK denies involvement by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      No.. the UK Government are not denying involvement, only the UK Treasury are. Not the same thing at all.

    4. Re:UK denies involvement by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Its deep in the text of "RT: NatWest to close Russian channel's UK bank accounts"
      http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
      "The UK Treasury said it does not comment on individual cases, but added that no new sanctions or obligations relating to Russia had been imposed on British banks by the government since February 2015."
      Very careful wording.
      The UK wording gets even more interesting in
      "NatWest decision over Russia's RT is matter for bank -UK PM spokeswoman" (Oct 17, 2016)
      http://www.reuters.com/article... or http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...
      "It's a matter for the bank and it's for them to decide who they offer services to based on their own risk appetite," ... spokeswoman told reporters."
      The term "risk appetite" is chilling.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:UK denies involvement by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      OK I guess it is possible that the Nat West Bank was gently reminded by the British government as to what the rules are.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    6. Re:UK denies involvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reads post
      looks up at user name

      aaaaah, ok makes sense

  22. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Radio Free Europe is...?

    Even propaganda should be protected free speech.

  23. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless you count the comment posted 6 minutes before yours in reply to the same comment as yours.. sure..

  24. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Since Russian is the second official language in Belarus, it still works.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  25. Re:Round 1, begin by Rei · · Score: 1

    You're not sure why? Did you see how hard it was to convince France to stop outright selling them their most advanced warship? So many people are willing to let business interests dominate the discussion; Europe (where I'm at) is particularly gutless on this front ("LA LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU, nothing going on, just business as usual!" (BOOM!!!! BOOM!!!) "I said NOTHING GOING ON, nope, pay no attention to those explosions next door to us!!!!")

    And Russia of course funds attacks on the other flank (Golden Dawn, Front National, Northern League, etc) - populists supporting policies favorable to Russia. And funds anti-fracking groups and other organizations that pose a threat to their energy dominance in Europe.

    Russia would really like to pivot east to China, and has tried, but it just hasn't gone well. Their infrastructure isn't there, their people aren't there, and even the places in China where they need the energy supplies aren't, for the most part, close to the border. Like it or not, Europe is their market. So they have to try to hold onto it. And they know Europe's main weaknesses: established business interests and not wanting to "rock the boat".

    --
    The internet is not a series of tubes. It's more like a net. Or a network of computers. Or an internet.
  26. Re:Round 1, begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Dear lord, this is just like Trump's unhinged tweeting. I'd believe it's him, but I'm sure he'd want to sign in & put his name on it.

  27. Is there more to this by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    I can't help wondering if there is more to this. For some reason, I get a bunch of Russia Today articles in my news feed. It's interesting to read their side of things from time to time. Heavily biased and full of pro-Russian propaganda, but I'm smart enough to wade through most of that.

    That said, it's hard to see how any of it is illegal and deserving of being closed down. Is there more to this story that isn't public? Or is this as simple as Britain shutting off RT just to quiet it. I hope there is more to this and not some overly sensitive clod high-up abusing his power.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Is there more to this by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Since it's government owned it's fair game for sanctions related to things like blowing up airliners in Ukraine and civilians in Syria.
      This doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the content, although that probably doesn't help.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Is there more to this by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      considering ALL sides are guilty of blowing up civilians in Syria does that mean we no longer get any press?

    3. Re:Is there more to this by Xest · · Score: 1

      "That said, it's hard to see how any of it is illegal and deserving of being closed down. Is there more to this story that isn't public? Or is this as simple as Britain shutting off RT just to quiet it. I hope there is more to this and not some overly sensitive clod high-up abusing his power."

      On the contrary, it's none of these things. It's a private sector organisation refusing to provide banking services to another private sector organisation.

      Businesses get to choose what other businesses they do business with, any decision to cease that needn't have anything to do with government enforced censorship - it could be anything from private censorship - i.e. the CEO deciding he wants his company to withdraw it's services to try and silence them, all the way through to RT constantly being in debt, not paying it's bills, or any such thing such that they're not a good customer to have.

      It's none of these things though, I've explained what it is here:

      https://slashdot.org/comments....

    4. Re:Is there more to this by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      banking/financial services don't/shouldn't have the right to discriminate based on political views and certainly should not be using their power to influence such a thing, that is actually far more scary than the government doing it. Not sure about the UK but many countries require banks to not discriminate based on anything other than financial ability to service debt, operate the account legally etc.

    5. Re:Is there more to this by Xest · · Score: 1

      I largely agree with you, but I'm not convinced it's a solveable problem, and you've kind of subconciously noted the problem with enforcing that strictly in your own post - what if someone has strong political views that most people find abhorrent, but the bank has to serve them anyway, but that person is also likely to get them in hot bother because they engage in money laundering, or because they simply cause the bank to take a loss? Can they close the account down?

      If no, then what happens when everyone whose causing the bank a loss simply declares they have strong political views and uses that as a shield, causing the bank to collapse?

      If yes, then what's to stop them just using that excuse to censor anyway - "Oh they're a fraud risk", or "Oh, they're not profitable enough", or "Oh, they cause reputational damage to the company causing a loss for us".

      I absolutely agree with you that financial censorship is scary, whatever one may think of Wikileaks (I don't really like it nowadays, it's become a propaganda organisation rather than a transparency organisation) I thought it was always rather disturbing that the US tried to shut down the Iraq/Afghan war log leaks by strongarming Mastercard, Visa, Paypal et. al. to not work with them to censor them and send them offline. It's definitely a real concern, but on the same note how do you implement that legislation whilst also allowing such organisations to reasonably run their businesses?

      Also, should it apply to just banks, all financial organisations, or every organisation? If it's just banks, then that means organisations like Paypal, Visa, and Mastercard can cut them off, if it's all financial organisations that's much more clear cut, but it doesn't change the fact other organisations can still censor - a communications infrastructure company could still choose to cut off their broadcast, so you could apply it to every organisation, but then you're right back to square one where businesses are having to potentially serve people that cause them loss and end up going out of businesses anyway.

      Here's a semi-related thought experiment from the UK's recent Brexit vote, in the UK it's illegal to discriminate against employees based on political views, but, if a company is forced to make cuts due to Brexit, then shouldn't a company be allowed to fire those who voted for it first and foremost over those who voted against it? Why should some suffer for other's decisions when it would be fairly trivial to make people accountable for their own actions in this sort of case? Should people really be protected from facing the consequences of their actions, whilst expecting others who aren't responsible for their actions to suffer the consequences instead?

      I don't know, or even pretend to know the answer to any of these questions - I'm just making the point that it's massively complex, and I'm not sure there really is a rationally objective answer. I think the answer is always going to be subjective and therein lies the problem - what you may view to be a reasonable approach may not be acceptable to the majority. That is unfortunately the reality of democracy, minority viewpoints often get fucked, and the sad reality is that many people don't actually have too much of a problem with censorship, as long as they're not the ones being censored - they're just too dumb to realise that one day it could be them.

  28. they were not expecting the british inquisition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh snap!!!

  29. Brexit? by Atryn · · Score: 1

    Are we far enough along with Brexit that this action doesn't reflect on the EU?

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
    1. Re:Brexit? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The hot air balloon that is Brexit has been heavily inflated, but has not made an inch of progress in measures that matter - legislation, principally. There has been ink spilled by the bucket load, probably only outweighed by the fuming sulphuric acid (a.k.a. vitriol) , but that's always a distraction from inaction.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  30. Have heard this is to shut down Assange by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Not sure how that works.

  31. As if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia cared about freedom of speech. Or freedom. Why dont they go back to their racist holes and throw some more homosexuals in jail..

    1. Re:As if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because where geopolitics is concerned, it all comes down to the faggots. That's the REAL issue. Fuck you.

    2. Re: As if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add urself yo the hole & u got urself a deal there buddy

  32. Re:Any day now by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Describing a country that spans 10 time zones, and that has borders w/ countries as varied as European ones, Japan, China, Korea and the Middle Eastern countries as a 'regional' power is absolutely laughable. Unless one now divides regions by latitude.

  33. Re: Any day now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia's days are numbered. And she knows it.

  34. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, no it doesnt.
    by that logic everything in Canada is owned by France.

  35. What reason was stated? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    Before we get into the whole "was the UK gov involved" quagmire, for what reason did the bank state that they froze the accounts? Without evidence, everything is pure speculation.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:What reason was stated? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      They gave no reason. RT published the letter on their website earlier. It was a vague corporate form letter saying the accounts would be closed because they no longer wished to provide services.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:What reason was stated? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Closing accounts is very different to freezing them.

    3. Re:What reason was stated? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The letter is "UK bank to close RT accounts, 'long live freedom of speech!' – editor-in-chief" (17 Oct, 2016)
      https://www.rt.com/news/363013...
      Enjoy the freedom to read the text in full :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:What reason was stated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The banks froze the accounts because the banks are run by rat-faced JEWS, that's why...
      And Russia isn't doing what the Jews want, so they are going to be punished...
      And idiots like you will probably end up being conscripted to go and kill innocent Russian people, because the JEWS in Russia haven't got enough power yet...

      Where the fuck have you been? Don't you have internet access?
      www.codoh.com
      www.nazigassings.com
      www.dailystormer.com

    5. Re:What reason was stated? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Vlad?

      More seriously, if you were running a bank, and had reason to suspect that one of your clients might be funneling funds through that weren't quite on the up and up, would you want to run the risk of it coming out in the press that you were supporting them? Even if you didn't have proof, just a reasonable suspicion, isn't that good enough for you to ask them to take their business elsewhere?

      With RT being nothing but a propaganda machine, I wouldn't want my bank to be supporting them, and I certainly wouldn't support a bank that did.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  36. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by unixisc · · Score: 1

    You mean it belongs to the Belarus government?

    Belarus has KDB rather than KGB, state in Belarussian is "dzyerzhava" as opposed to [red] Russian "gosudarstvo". But then, Lukashenko hardly even knows Belarussian...

    It's a better idea to use the term 'Soviet' instead of Russian when the union of 15 Soviet communist republics existed, and when Russian only referred to the RSFSR

  37. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    This is the kind of thing Russia and China do to US/EU media groups.

    Which ones?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  38. Re:Any day now by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Hold your breath. Go on. I dare you.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  39. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    RT is and has always been part of the propaganda arm of the FSB. Yes, the vast majority of stories it runs are true, and responsible journalism (with the exception of now, while they are ramping up to try to destroy the US electoral system), however, their standard play-book is to leak the random false propaganda story in with the real occasionally. This gives the propaganda more credibility. This is what they have done to steal elections from Ukraine, and attempt the same in France and Germany where they have printed false stories in favor of far-right white-supremacist parties. This is the exact reason why Liz Wahl resigned while live on-air.

    Please read this Newsweek article on the subject:

    http://www.newsweek.com/rt-america-anchor-resigns-protest-white-washed-ukraine-coverage-230969

  40. Re:Round 1, begin by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    stop backing the Syrian regime so Europe and the Middle East can deal with the influx of refugees.

    You are laughably uninformed. Carry on.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  41. Re:Round 1, begin by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    You do not outsource the construction of your most advanced or secret technology. The Mistrals were helicopter carriers. A helicopter carrier is not a new concept, nor is there anything particularly advanced about it. France had to pay reparations for breach of contract, by the way. This doesn't say so much about Russia as about how much France is an American puppet.

    And Russia of course funds attacks on the other flank (Golden Dawn, Front National, Northern League, etc) - populists supporting policies favorable to Russia. And funds anti-fracking groups and other organizations that pose a threat to their energy dominance in Europe.

    You have actual evidence of this or are just making shit up?

    but it just hasn't gone well. Their infrastructure isn't there, their people aren't there, and even the places in China where they need the energy supplies aren't, for the most part, close to the border.

    Yes they're doing something that's totally ALIEN to Americans because they haven't done it in so long - they're :: get this :: BUILDING the infrastructure. This creates jobs, which attracts people. It attracts the workers. And it attracts all the people who want to provide services to the workers. The gas pipeline will be ready in 4 years. Then it will be built.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  42. How about using Wells Fargo? by Streetlight · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't be surprised if Wells Fargo might be interested in setting up multiple accounts for Russia Today. They have the infrastructure in place to set up multiple accounts whether you want them or not, though that infrastructure has been sidelined recently.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  43. COMMUNICATIONS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An attack on communications can mean only one thing... WAR!

  44. Re:Round 1, begin by Cederic · · Score: 1

    he Mistrals were helicopter carriers. A helicopter carrier is not a new concept, nor is there anything particularly advanced about it.

    That doesn't stop it being France's most advanced warship.

    You're also rather naive if you think a warship is just a chunk of metal and maybe a couple of wocka wockas.

    The French have historically actually been very good at designing and building warships. Just utter shite at fighting in them.

  45. Re:Round 1, begin by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    That doesn't stop it being France's most advanced warship.

    Then France is in a pretty sorry state. Not to mention the fact that someone should be concerned that they're selling one to that staunch ally and NATO member - Egypt............ oh wait

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  46. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    That doesn't [sound] like much of a stretch...

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  47. Re:Any day now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What border does Russia share with a Middle Eastern country?

  48. Honestly... by benjfowler · · Score: 1

    These stupid vatniks didn't realistically expect that their dirty and unsavoury tactics against the West wouldn't be repaid in kind, did they?

  49. Re:Round 1, begin by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    There is nothing advanced about Mistral - it is basically a modified ferry.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  50. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Larry King has been a KGB agent since 2013?

  51. Re:Any day now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends on how you define the Middle East! I imagine this is supposed to refer to the borders with Georgia and Azerbaijan. Though it may be mistakenly referring to Central Asia as part of the Middle East.

  52. Re:Any day now by unixisc · · Score: 1

    I was referring to Azerbaijan - ethnically Turkic, religiously Muslim. Also, depending on how much influence either Turkey or Iran ultimately have in the stans, they may fall under that definition as well. While it may be inaccurate to think of the stans as Middle Eastern, historic cities like Samarqand, Buqhara, Merw, Nisa were historic cities in medieval Iran and Turkestan

  53. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    It's a better idea to use the term 'Soviet' instead of Russian when the union of 15 Soviet communist republics existed, and when Russian only referred to the RSFSR

    There's no "Soviet" language even though one of those republics forced its language on others to a level that only the French (as a minority or majority) beat, including forcing people to switch their native languages to Cyrillic.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  54. NOT posting anonymously. by mmell · · Score: 1
    I guess I get a buy on being called a conspiratard because I never thought it'd come to this and so never said anything out loud until it was too late . . .

    (Says one prairie dog to the other): "I think the lawnmower's gone. I'm gonna stick my head up and check."

    ***WHACK!***

  55. Re:Round 1, begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have actual evidence of this or are just making shit up?

    http://www.politico.eu/article/le-pen-russia-crimea-putin-money-bank-national-front-seeks-russian-cash-for-election-fight/

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/16/russian-resurgence-how-the-kremlin-is-making-its-presence-felt-across-europe

    http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/02/23/why-europe-is-right-to-fear-putins-useful-idiots/

    It's also widely thought that Russia was funding the Ukrainian fascists before the coup against Yanukovych. You can draw your own conclusions about why it might have been useful for them to fund a coup against their own man.

    Yes they're doing something that's totally ALIEN to Americans because they haven't done it in so long - they're :: get this :: BUILDING the infrastructure.

    Are you not aware of the huge commotion in the US in recent years about the big oil pipelines being built?

  56. They are not "frozen" or "closed" by aepervius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They were given a two months notice. Whatever the reason. They can still access their assets and move them elsewhere. A PITA, yes, but a far cry from "frozen".

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  57. Please allow me to introduce myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who controls the British crown?
    Who keeps the metric system down?
    We do, we do!

    Who keeps Atlantis off the maps?
    Who keeps the Martians under wraps?
    We do, we do!

    Who holds back the electric car?
    Who makes Steve Guttenberg a star?
    We do, we do!

    Who robs cavefish of their sight?
    Who rigs every Oscar night?
    We do!
    We do!!!

  58. Re:Round 1, begin by rtb61 · · Score: 1

    Seriously get real. The US government opinion as given by Hillary Clinton, let them kill each other until they get tired of it, this after the US pumped them up and supplied arms and munitions (this includes Syria, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Iran and to be brutally honest pretty much the entire African continent, shh, it also includes NATO member Turkey). They do not give one crap about how many die, well, that's not quite accurate, more accurately they do care that as many die as possible. As for the Ukraine, did not the Ukraine government report a BUK system, launcher, transport and radar system missing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., also they apparently lost the entire specialist crew required to operate the system, complete with photographic proof of the lost equipment before the US government changed their minds and their stories. Did not the Ukraine government purposefully direct that flight over the zone and then destroyed the record of radio transmissions and radar records. Russia did not so much annex Crimea as dump the Ukraine and took the Crimea back, seriously what the fuck did the Ukraine expect the outcome would be).

    Why the stupidity because RT is exposing western corruption upon a daily basis and in typical psychopath corporate executive fashion in the most ignorant and arrogant manner possible, those insiders telling tens of thousands of well trained FSB agents to fuck off. This without the tacit agreement to not launch more personally directed eliminations unlike the currently protected politicians and government officers, corporate executives lack that protection. Now those corporate executives are choosing to attack Russia and so the Russian response will be interesting, they do prefer extended imprisonment in Siberia, a huge preference for that, the Chinese government on the other hand is quite comfortable with executing corporate executives no matter where they come from (they are most upset with regard to the corporate war games and threats of nuclear first strike, which will never happen, even if they took out a thousand corrupt executives).

    Ahh, when corporate executives look to play war games, killing as many people as they can get away with, whilst pocketing billions in profits and feeding their insane sick egos.

    --
    Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  59. To note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes a retard of cosmic proportions to want to fuck with russia as if its a simple no cost matter, luckily for us the left is full of joyous beta male retards who think the world is their pearl, the universe is rosy & that they are all special hairless monkey snowflakes

    1. Re:To note by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      When the west bargained from a position of strength, we ended the Cold War. And when Obama thought we could just all sing Kumbaya, Russia took that as a sign of weekness...as did N. Korea, Iran, and others, and they took advantage of it. So if, by "fuck with Russia" you mean let them do what they want, you're an idiot.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  60. Re: Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this thread, The Russia Defense League

  61. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and how is that any different to how the US Government uses the press?

  62. Not the uk government doing this... by Smid · · Score: 1

    This isn't sanctioned by the uk government. It's a bank who, for some reason, has decided they don't to take a risk with Russia Today. There's nothing stopping Russia Today opening another bank account with another bank in the UK.

    To say it's under the control of the uk government is wrong. They bailed this shoddy excuse for a financial institution in the last recession, and would likely sell it up if it ever got worth anything.

    However, RT IS a voice of the Kremlin. They both share those chips on their shoulders. Indeed, it's quite bizarre when there's news about Ukranian rebels accused of shooting down a commercial airline on all the other news broadcasts. RT will not even mention this news even to deny it...

  63. Re: Any day now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    possibly, but then So are the US and UK's. I think the US is likely to go down first, they have an economic, political and military holes and they just keep digging. Russia has a lot of political problems but has quite a vast amount of natural resources that can keep it going a lot longer than the US. Hopefully those all the dick waving superpowers days are numbered though, especially US and Russia. between them they have caused more death and destruction than the rest of the planet combined.

  64. Re:Round 1, begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this point Russia is actually the best chance of stopping the influx of refugees the fastest, but that also means the US doesn't get the economic benefits they were chasing by backing the Rebels. Sadly Money is likely to rank as higher importance than stopping refugees

  65. Re:Round 1, begin by Xest · · Score: 1

    "You have actual evidence of this or are just making shit up?"

    Actually there's a shit load of evidence of this, if rather than simply trying to declare the other person's post false you could've simply Googled it. Given that an AC appears to have done that for you it appears I wont have to. Long story short though, some of it is covert, and some of it is overt. There's evidence of both, but the funding for France's national front for example wasn't even a secret:

    https://themoscowtimes.com/new...

    Russia also holds an annual meeting of far right European leaders including people like Le Pen, Nick Griffin from the UK's BNP and so on and so forth. Interestingly these groups they host were the same people, and the only people they allowed into Crimea as "international observers" for their Crimean independence referendum - they wouldn't let any actual neutral observers in from the UN et. al. Make of that what you will, it's really not rocket science though.

  66. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in Russia you can speak ukrainian. In Ukraine you go to jail if you speak russian. Do you really are saying Russia is a dictatorship, while the US, UE, Ukraine, Saudi Arabia are angelic democracies?

  67. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by guestapoo · · Score: 1

    The announcement to resign of Liz Wahl was lived air, without being interrupted. And, RT claimed that she is a "mole", just staged a plan to show RT is a propaganda network.
    Another reporter, but less of attention is Abby Martin, because she did not resign and RT did not fire her.

  68. Re: Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Most people in Ukraine routinely speak Russian as their preferred language. If you watch Ukrainian trips fighting the Russian troops in Ukraine, you will hear all the Ukrainians speaking in Russian. It's not a war about language.

  69. Re:Round 1, begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hull is one thing. Combined arms communications/networking, advanced sensor arrays, and cutting edge fire control systems aren't found on the average ferry.

  70. Re:Nice to see the West pulling tricks from the by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    yé, thing is here they claim not to do it ... my today reading slashdot session is giving me acid reflux i might as well have turned on the tv lol omg ... i think we should all invest heavily in ironcurtain building companies cos it seems we gonna get nothing but that in the next decade ... so i need to get out
    of europe
    FAST

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?