Slashdot Mirror


Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos Thinks Space Can Be the New Internet (theverge.com)

Speaking at the Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit in San Francisco today, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos said space is essentially a new internet, as it is the next frontier that needs new infrastructure to support new entrepreneurs. He said the purpose of Blue Origin is to build out a similar kind of infrastructure for space that Amazon used to operate during the days of the early internet, such as the United States Postal Service and long distance phone network. The Verge reports: "Two kids in their dorm room can reinvent an industry," Bezos said, referring to the strengths of the modern internet. "Two kids in their dorm room cannot do anything interesting in space." Bezos says rocket reusability needs to be improved, and both Blue Origin and Elon Musk's SpaceX are working toward the goal of vastly reducing the cost of sending payloads to space. Bezos said there's also a number of restraints right now that prevent the kind of entrepreneurial spirit that helped create Amazon do the same for a next-generation space venture. "We need to be able to put big things in space at low cost." Bezos talked of his earliest days at Amazon more than 20 years ago, where he was driving packages himself to the post office with a 10-person team. "We were sitting on a bunch of a heavy lifting infrastructure," he said. "For example, there was already a gigantic network called United States Postal Service. The internet itself was sitting on time of the long distance phone network." This is the kind of infrastructure Bezos hopes to build out with Blue Origin. "Every time you figure out some way of providing tools and services that allow other people to deploy their creativity, you're really onto something," Bezos said. But building that infrastructure space is still the grandest dream. "I think space is about to enter a golden age."

90 comments

  1. So does this imply that if I live in the ISS... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 2

    ...I can subscribe to Amazon Prime program ?

    1. Re:So does this imply that if I live in the ISS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't even subscribe to Amazon Prime in the Amazon rainforest. I think we can hit that target first.

  2. Yeah, right. by EzInKy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So now that the costs of research and experimentation have been paid for by the public, "entrepreneurs" are willing to step up and reap the profits?

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Yeah, right. by rickyslashdot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, sir, this is EXACTLY what NASA was initially designed to do, and still does in many areas of research. Basically, govt / public funded research to develop technologies that can then be passed to the private sector for utilization (and, yes, even exploitation). I would mod you down (ignorance / flame-bait), except I cannot post and mod the same article.

      --
      redneck geek
    2. Re:Yeah, right. by joh · · Score: 2

      Just like with... the Internet?

    3. Re:Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly. The costs of research and experimentation are ongoing - that's why the "entrepeneurs" want the public to pay them all the money. (Not because it makes any sort of independent economic sense on its own, certainly.)

    4. Re:Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The costs of research and experimentation are ongoing [...]

      Exactly. NASA is (after the military) probably the biggest pork barrel distributor in the US.

      Not that I don't appreciate what they're doing (technically), but they could operate much better if they weren't forced to fulfill this politico-economical job.

      And seeing them getting flak because "private is more efficient than state" (HAH) just hurts.

    5. Re: Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon will build the next outerspace domed geocities.com and xoom.net it's all its trash and junk all up in your space.

    6. Re:Yeah, right. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      So now that the costs of research and experimentation have been paid for by the public, "entrepreneurs" are willing to step up and reap the profits?

      As long as they don't try to patent it for themselves, why in hell not?

    7. Re:Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Bezos is using a crazy analogy in order to get his hands on some government money. The "internet" level opportunity in space has already been realized. That opportunity was satellites for communication, global positioning and observation of the earth(weather etc) . It is a crazy analogy because the internet leveraged existing infrastructure already financed by existing use. The space opportunity is not already financed and the payoff is more obscure and uncertain. Mining in space presents real potential gains. But even then the internet outclasses that opportunity. Tourism is really not in the same league as global internet communications. Tourism is like the economy of Jamaica where the internet is like the economy of California in comparison. Tourism doesn't really facilitate subsequent technology the way communication does.

    8. Re:Yeah, right. by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is or whatever its not. Fact is the big boys are starting to measure dicks in space. Way better than the muppets and certainly less waste of money then the 3DTV in every living room ..., o i mean vr sets ...
      The way this is going can only be beneficial ... musk, boeing, besos ... thats big folk who don't like to lose, private sector, they really couldnt stand any of the others getting in before they do so this might actually turn americants back into americans before the chinese colonise pluto.
      which is extra competition ... which is the only thing that seems to motivate these people : killroy was here first
      i dont think they ever played co-op matches back in the days of doom primus

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    9. Re:Yeah, right. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Fine, but don't pretend this is some sort of private space industry, when it's just a giant welfare program.

  3. just one teeny tiny difference.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the internet has just a slightly lower cost-of-entry than space.

    1. Re:just one teeny tiny difference.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend has a very high cost of entry. Reentry isnt on the cards just yet until the next promotion so i can aford to buy her a horse then reentry is achievable.

    2. Re:just one teeny tiny difference.... by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      On the positive side, thanks to gravity the exit cost from space is nil.

    3. Re:just one teeny tiny difference.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude get another girlfriend. Reentry costs for mine are CONSIDERABLY lower :)

    4. Re:just one teeny tiny difference.... by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      I hear reentry costs for your mom are ZERO

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    5. Re: just one teeny tiny difference.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "eeking out excess server capacity."

      Like they saw a mouse on the floor or something? That's eking.

    6. Re:just one teeny tiny difference.... by dargaud · · Score: 2

      Wrong. Thanks to orbital mechanics, you have a lot of inertia to shed, and thus need to accelerate in the opposite direction, spending precious fuel before you can hit the atmosphere again. Or wait years / forever for atmospheric friction to slow you down, depending on the altitude of your orbit.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    7. Re:just one teeny tiny difference.... by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      You'll never be able to compete with a horse. After all, it's hung like . . . . a horse.

    8. Re: just one teeny tiny difference.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't compare information processing with physical transport. Information is weightless and it's taking less and less matter and energy every year to store and process information. A computer from 1965 doesn't look a thing like a 2016 computer.

      Cars, planes, boats, and houses? Look exactly the same. If you wanted to go to the Moon today, you'd start with a metal tube full of fuel, and it would look pretty much like a rocket from 1965. The pointy end points at the sky, the fire end points down.

      Space is a dead end, always was, always will be.

    9. Re: just one teeny tiny difference.... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, it was a computer mouse.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  4. So you're telling me by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

    I can shitpost IN SPACE soon?

    Excellent.

    1. Re:So you're telling me by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      And you'll soon be able to get emails from the recently deposed Ploivark of Proxima Centauri who needs your help in getting 2^27 Zroogledollars out of the country and is willing to cut you in for a generous percentage and just needs a very small investment to make the funds available to you.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  5. Slashdot Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...The internet itself was sitting on time of the long distance phone network."
    Try this instead, Bezos Bozo:
    "...The internet itself was sitting on top of the long distance phone network."

    What Bezos, and similar Libertarian Leeches fail to appreciate is... well, this:
    "For example, there was already a gigantic network called United States Postal Service..."
    Benjamin Franklin is credited with the idea of the Postal Service as a Government function in the US, because Private Enterprise had failed in this function up to then. Franklin was many wonderful things, but ultimately he was that rare American Character- A Realist. Some things simply have to be left for those that we choose to Govern Us.
    While Bezos et al are rewriting History to suit their egos, note that four little letters are missing from this Puff Piece. An "N", an "A", an "S", and another "A". I know that "NASA" is, by Bezos' Standards, an antiquated Government Institution, somewhat like the Postal Service, that hasn't ever created something New and Profitable for Centuries. (Centuries, Decades, Parsecs... what are you, a Commie?)

    I actually do hope that Bezos succeeds. That would be a wonderful thing, somewhat unprecedented in US History. But to ignore the Billions of Dollars, tens of thousands of People, and a few deaths that some of us still grieve, in search of Profit In Space for Bozos...
    That is something of which I will not put up with. No Siree.

    Captcha: trouble

  6. True or not but... by joh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a chance of slightly more than zero that something like that is going to happen and ignoring it may mean to miss it or to come too late. Of course there is a dream of tricking out the limits of growth by just growing out of Earth. Then someone else already is sitting on the juiciest resources out there.

    Well, either that or we will be increasingly fighting over diminishing resources down here, sooner or later. In case you haven't noticed the world is becoming smaller and smaller.

    Bezos is just spending some money on trying not to miss the ultimate growth opportunity in history. In the worst case he will just be selling engines to ULA (and he's is already developing the BE4 engine for them).

  7. Two kids in their dorm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can do nothing on the internet now; people expect polished products and most markets are getting saturated and if you do start to gain traction in some new area, the big guys like Amazon can easily spin up their own version of whatever you're doing rather than buy you out.

    1. Re:Two kids in their dorm by TomashBraun · · Score: 1

      I agree with you

  8. Silicon valley just gets stupider by the cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    call me when we can lift millions of people into orbit, not to mention the Lagrange points the moon, mar etc, the internet cost nothing space will cost thousands of times planetary gdp

  9. I was going to agree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They can turn it into just as big of a cesspool as the internet has become, funnelling all the profits into an ever decreasing group's pockets while they first flaunt then pay fines to get back on the good side of the law. And all the while the little guy will be fucked as there is less opportunity to earn the money necessary to own your own property and as the physical resources are cornered more and more first by corporate might and then by legal capture.

    Space as Internet makes Sad Panda stuffed panda.

  10. Tired of this space obsession by Viol8 · · Score: 0

    What is this obsession with shoving stuff into space? There are already so many satellites in orbit that we'll soon be at a critical point of so much space debris flying around that it'll be self generating and dangerous for humans to venture there especially if this idiotic idea of microsatellites takes off (pun intended). As for deep space - until someone invents a serious much faster and practical competitor to the chemical rocket we ain't going anywhere and thats only going to happen if the laws of physics suddenly open up in unexpected ways. I know a lot of people dream of a Star Trek like world, but I'm afraid its just TV kids, reality is another ball game entirely.

    1. Re:Tired of this space obsession by phayes · · Score: 2

      What is this obsession with moving out of the basement? There are already so many people in cars driving around that we'll soon be at a critical point of so much cars driving around that it'll be self generating and dangerous for humans to venture there especially if this idiotic idea of autonomous vehicles takes off. As for flying vehicles, called aeroplanes - until someone invents a serious much faster and practical competitor to ships we ain't going anywhere and thats only going to happen if the laws of physics suddenly open up in unexpected ways. I know a lot of people dream of a Jules Verne like world, but I'm afraid its just books kids, reality is another ball game entirely.

      Yeah, not a prefect match but does reflect your "I don't understand it so it can't happen outlook".

      Two specific points:
      The Microsat movement isn't going to contribute much to space pollution as low lifetime sats deployed to low orbits aren't the problem.
      Creating an space-based economy and self sustaining workforce aren't objectives beyond our means unless we allow ourselves to be hobbled.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    2. Re: Tired of this space obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellites are barely in space. The ISS is barely in space.
      But I agree. We need more deep space exploration like the Voyager probes. And we need to make a space internet!
      Wifi on Mars 2021!

    3. Re:Tired of this space obsession by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Oh look, lame sarcasm in place of a reasoned response. How unlike slashdot.

      "The Microsat movement isn't going to contribute much to space pollution as low lifetime sats deployed to low orbits aren't the problem."

      Who said they're only in low orbit?

      "Creating an space-based economy and self sustaining workforce"

      And what exactly does that hand waving soundbite mean in practise? What will the economy be based on, how will they be self sustaining in a hard vacuum with everything having to be shipped up from earth? Take your time.

    4. Re:Tired of this space obsession by swb · · Score: 2

      The way I look at is if the reusable rocket guys get the cost of orbital rockets down to 1/10th of the cost that it is now, lots of options open up. If you can get 10 trips up for the cost of 1 now, suddenly assembling a Mars-distance ship in orbit and all the fuel and supplies to make it happen seems pretty plausible.

      We aren't going interstellar without some new physics, but with a much less expensive orbital lift platform, interplanetary starts to look much more within reach even if it is initially limited to Mars or even Mars orbit stations.

    5. Re:Tired of this space obsession by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Two specific points: The Microsat movement isn't going to contribute much to space pollution as low lifetime sats deployed to low orbits aren't the problem.

      We already have a government/military component spending hundreds of millions of dollars every year tracking every single piece of space junk we've put out there in our artificial asteroid belt. And if the planet is any indication, any place we humans occupy we manage to fuck up with garbage. This will become a problem because of the exponential growth in interest they're hoping to drum up with this capitalist space race. Forget low orbit. Higher orbits will become the issue when human arrogance labels low orbit for "losers" who "can't get it up" or some stupid shit. You know, kind of like the bigger-dick syndrome we suffered from in the 60s with planting a flag on a moon.

      Creating an space-based economy and self sustaining workforce aren't objectives beyond our means unless we allow ourselves to be hobbled.

      Speaking of hobbled, tell me how well our electronic world that is critically dependent on communications would fare if a catastrophic event occurred where the majority of our major satellite system were inadvertently destroyed. It would be at minimum years before we could fully recover communications and capability at this level. For the fucking planet. Good luck with your "self-sustaining" workforce then.

      TL; DR - Humans fuck up any space they occupy. History has shown this, so don't be ignorant about the inevitable dangers of exponential growth.

    6. Re:Tired of this space obsession by Foundryman · · Score: 2

      What's cool about your post is that I can swap your space references with Internet references and it still stands up pretty good!

      "What is this obsession with shoving stuff into the Internet? There are already so many things in the Internet that we'll soon be at a critical point of so much Internet debris flying around that it'll be self generating and dangerous for humans to venture to the Internet especially if this idiotic idea of IoT takes off (pun intended). As for deep web - until someone invents a serious much faster and practical competitor to the Tor Browser we ain't going anywhere and thats only going to happen if the laws of physics suddenly open up in unexpected ways. I know a lot of people dream of a Star Trek like world, but I'm afraid its just TV kids, reality is another ball game entirely."

    7. Re:Tired of this space obsession by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What is this obsession with shoving stuff into space? There are already so many satellites in orbit that we'll soon be at a critical point of so much space debris flying around that it'll be self generating and dangerous

      Maybe with lower costs, some of this extra stuff could actually take the other old stuff out of the way?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Tired of this space obsession by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Since the Jules Vernes times, we've learnt that no civilizations exist on Mars and Venus. Two or three habitable planets in the same solar system would have been awesome and we'd be there already, but too bad.

    9. Re:Tired of this space obsession by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The way I look at is if the reusable rocket guys get the cost of orbital rockets down to 1/10th of the cost that it is now, lots of options open up. If you can get 10 trips up for the cost of 1 now, suddenly assembling a Mars-distance ship in orbit and all the fuel and supplies to make it happen seems pretty plausible.

      Assuming the rocket is really the blocking cost. A Falcon 9 expendable is around $62M * 130% = $80M for 22,800 kg to LEO. Even a hundred launches for 2,280,000 kg payload (Saturn V had 140,000 kg to LEO) would be "just" $8 billion and they've spent more on that developing the SLS before it's flown once. Granted it'd be some assembly required but >20 ton modules aren't trivially small either if we design good interlocks and docking in space is pretty routine now with the ISS. So for the sake of argument, say we're now down to $800 million instead that's basically pocket change in this context. We'll still need everything else, uniquely designed for this particular mission. I think a one-off mission will still be >10 billion. Musk is thinking further out than that though, he'll want to bring the price so far down we'll want to keep going. Not one mission but ten, hundred or a thousand. Good for him, but there's still some pretty big hurdles to cross... they need a customer who's willing to pay.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Tired of this space obsession by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Because in the future, there will be no more jobs on Earth and people will have to venture out into the final frontier for work.

    11. Re:Tired of this space obsession by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I'm a pretty dull guy and when I first saw the internet, I immediately thought of a dozen cool things to do with it. And that was in the first 30 seconds without trying. Thousands, millions, of people have been trying to justify space for half a century and all we have is...tourism. Everything else is better with machines.

    12. Re:Tired of this space obsession by swb · · Score: 1

      There isn't any one fix that makes it cheap, but making orbit much cheaper to get to seems one of the more major steps to going anywhere.

    13. Re:Tired of this space obsession by phayes · · Score: 1

      Two specific points:
      The Microsat movement isn't going to contribute much to space pollution as low lifetime sats deployed to low orbits aren't the problem.

      We already have a government/military component spending hundreds of millions of dollars every year tracking every single piece of space junk we've put out there in our artificial asteroid belt. And if the planet is any indication, any place we humans occupy we manage to fuck up with garbage. This will become a problem because of the exponential growth in interest they're hoping to drum up with this capitalist space race. Forget low orbit. Higher orbits will become the issue when human arrogance labels low orbit for "losers" who "can't get it up" or some stupid shit. You know, kind of like the bigger-dick syndrome we suffered from in the 60s with planting a flag on a moon.

      Millions of $$$ every year just to track space debris?!? You're delusional. The tracking radars were not developed and paid for in order to track space debris, but to detect attacks upon the U.S. Until the U.S. no longer fears missile attack, the cost will be borne by the military. Use of those radars to track debris in an incidental and beneficial side effect that is almost free, not the reason we continue to spend hundreds of millions/year to do so. If, in your opinion, mankind is such a problem I'd suggest that you help us all out by removing yourself as part of "the problem".

      Creating an space-based economy and self sustaining workforce aren't objectives beyond our means unless we allow ourselves to be hobbled.

      Speaking of hobbled, tell me how well our electronic world that is critically dependent on communications would fare if a catastrophic event occurred where the majority of our major satellite system were inadvertently destroyed. It would be at minimum years before we could fully recover communications and capability at this level. For the fucking planet. Good luck with your "self-sustaining" workforce then.

      TL; DR - Humans fuck up any space they occupy. History has shown this, so don't be ignorant about the inevitable dangers of exponential growth.

      Ah, because you think that because you've never heard of anyone preparing for a situation where a major solar storm or nefarious action that no-one in the Military has ever thought that loss of GPS and comm Sats would be critical to our Defence? You think that the Military that has plans for everything including invasion by Canada wouldn't have thought of that and prepared for it with sufficient spare satellites on a black budget to restore minimal function within ASAP? The capability certainly exists and anyone with half a brain would have figured that out and that it isn't publicised to keep it as safe as possible.

      History has also shown what happens to the stagnant. They're the ones that used to live where you do now.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    14. Re:Tired of this space obsession by phayes · · Score: 1

      So in your opinion "shoving stuff into space" is insightful commentary.... Nope, it's knuckle-dragging commentary well deserving of ridicule.

      If you want to come off as informed/insightful why don't you inform us exactly what orbit categories microsats have been launched into up to now, proving that microsats are a long term menace due to their multiplication in long term orbits and not a category of objects that reenter and burn up before ever becoming one. Ah but that'd be _hard_, certainly too hard for a knuckle-dragger.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    15. Re:Tired of this space obsession by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Re-usability doesn't just lower cost, but increases launch cadence because you don't need to build a hundred rockets for a hundred launches.

  11. Great! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

    So your all for increasing NASA's budget in the off chance other new profitable opportunities will arise?

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    1. Re:Great! by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lets be honest, no one wants to increase government budgets, what most would consider reasonable is shifting some of the budget from the War Industrial Complex. Some of that War Industrial Complex spending should also be shifted to infrastructure spending and well, what is development of space but quite simply the building of off earth infrastructure to allow access for humanity, not only to the rest of the solar system but also the galaxy beyond that. It will also not be one nations goal but the majority of democratic nations working together to achieve a goal for the entirety of humanity on this planet.

      The comparison of what that exploration provides, is the gap between cave persons and where we are today. So, why leave the cave, why climb past that mountain range, why cross oceans, well, if we hadn't there would still be a tiny number individuals squatting in caves, terrified of all the far more physically capable predators around us and continually under threat of immediate extinction.

      It is not destiny, it is just another challenge, just another goal, just another step in working together to become more than what we were. We will either fail or succeed but we will most certainly fail ie extinction inevitable, if we do not try. Personally I see that step next step of becoming a galactic species to be the greatest ever possible achievement of humanity, every other fear pales against it (consider that trillions of species over billions of years did not manage to escape this planetary cocoon and we are now in a position to do so). Humanity on many worlds and scattered throughout the galaxy, writing their history across this galaxy, possibly hundreds of millions of year of it. How can you deny that, in all good conscience, to future generations. This versus turning in on ourselves, squabbling ever more violently over diminishing resources and tearing down this planet down around ourselves.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Great! by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2

      you're

      Damn, this is tiresome !

    3. Re:Great! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      Then don't waste so much time on trivial matters.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    4. Re:Great! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying if anyone benefits all who paid should profit. Why would you have a problem with that?

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    5. Re:Great! by umghhh · · Score: 1

      But they do. This is true now and was true before. State supports development of some silly thing like pyramids or suez canal, investors pile up the finances in hope of profit all gain. The same happened with pyramids and the same happened with railways (with exception of Brits who developed rail but have no rail service to speak of and benefit from). Any big industrial development has been based on state induced investment that usually failed and became a fertile ground for others.
      The only problem with that is when the state gives the inventions for free without conditions attached - see all the medical research done for government money and sold for lots of green stuff by private companies.

    6. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get the trivial things right if they're so trivial.

    7. Re:Great! by Drethon · · Score: 1

      Lets be honest, no one wants to increase government budgets, what most would consider reasonable is shifting some of the budget from the War Industrial Complex. Some of that War Industrial Complex spending should also be shifted to infrastructure spending and well, what is development of space but quite simply the building of off earth infrastructure to allow access for humanity, not only to the rest of the solar system but also the galaxy beyond that. It will also not be one nations goal but the majority of democratic nations working together to achieve a goal for the entirety of humanity on this planet.

      I'm pretty sure that war complex is already performing a lot of that kind of research. Just shifting from classified military development to publicly available research would be freaken awesome.

    8. Re:Great! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 0

      If you can't get this trivial thing right, what kinds of trivial mistakes are you making in your programming?

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    9. Re:Great! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, not just the US but a whole bunch of countries spending ludicrous amounts on the war black hole, all those investments either thrown away or blown up. Once the leading spender refocuses their excess war spending so the rest will follow, else get left behind, seriously left behind. Governments would suffer huge loss of prestige for failing to participate and effectively, permanently, limiting the future of their society.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    10. Re:Great! by EzInKy · · Score: 1

      If I were a programmer I MIGHT worry about such minutia, but would bank on AI eventually becoming smart enough to interpret the usual human error. After all, people have been doing it since there were people.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    11. Re:Great! by gtall · · Score: 2

      The U.S. government budget for 2016 was $3.999 Trillion. The U.S. Defense Dept. budget for 2016 was $597 Billion. So, that's, 14% of the budget. Of that, approx. 1/2 is due to personnel costs. Another $100 Billion goes into physical plant, leaving about $200 Billion for everything else. A chunk of that goes into R&D and not fielded weapons.

      Now, about the War Industrial Complex. Most companies do not rely on U.S. Defense dollars because the money isn't big enough. The U.S. has approx. at $19 Trillion economy. To think you are going to swing that in any direction with $200 is silly. You might argue that the entire approx. $600 Billion should be included. However, if you remove that from salaries, health benefits, etc., you lose that chunk of the economic savings you think you are going to get.

    12. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all profit is monetary. You are profiting now.

    13. Re:Great! by khallow · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying if anyone benefits all who paid should profit. Why would you have a problem with that?

      Why should that be the case? Money isn't always helping, especially when a) the research would happen anyway, or b) you're paying scientists to do less productive work? Those two problems are particularly common with publicly funded research.

  12. KIt's all fun and games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until you get sucked out of an airlock.

  13. The Final Frontier! by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    Growth at any cost is the human way. When humanity stagnates we start getting antsy and when we start getting antsy people start to do things that are destructive.

    We need to figure out how to navigate space. We need to figure out how to colonize other worlds. There are asteroids out there filled with all sorts of lovely minerals for the taking.

    Saying, "There's no financial incentive to go up there" is a defeatist mindset. It's the logical next step in our cultural and technological advancement as a species. Self driving cars, smart phones, and even the internet are small peanuts compared to the veritable gold mine that space is.

    1. Re:The Final Frontier! by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Growth at any cost is the human way. When humanity stagnates we start getting antsy and when we start getting antsy people start to do things that are destructive.

      We need to figure out how to navigate space. We need to figure out how to colonize other worlds. There are asteroids out there filled with all sorts of lovely minerals for the taking...

      Minerals you say? Well then, let's go! After all, nothing "destructive" has ever followed mans quest for minerals on our planet, right? I mean that whole thing about blood diamonds, I'm sure it's just a myth. And scientists have now proven that the vacuum of space is going to suck all the evil from capitalistic greed and turn it into a magical utopia of growth and prosperity.

      Human behavior will not change in a vacuum, so I fully expect to see countries waging warfare over asteroids or planets. History has proven this, and continues to today, so wake up.

    2. Re:The Final Frontier! by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Mineral resources on Earth are becoming increasingly difficult to reach on environmental grounds alone. At some point wil become cheaper to get our metals from asteroids than from ever-deeper, ever more environmentally problematic terrestrial mines. Here in Arizona, a multibillion dollar copper mine is on hold to protect the habitat of a single individual panther.

    3. Re:The Final Frontier! by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Growth at any cost is the human way.

      No it's not. That is the defining feature of western civilization, not humanity.

  14. Metaphor? I dont' know what it's for. by PMuse · · Score: 1

    Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos Thinks [a cheap* heavy launch infrastructure] Can Be the New Internet

    There, fixed that for you. What Bezos is saying is that Amazon's rise was possible because some one had already deployed a long distance phone network and a postal system, and had already invented the Internet and the web. He is proposing to invent*/deploy the systems that will make startup companies for applications in space feasible.

    *This is the step of his proposal, where a miracle occurs, is not going to be as hard as jumping from a long distance phone network to the Internet was. It is going to be as hard as jumping from hide drums to the Internet was.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  15. Space Porn? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    Count me in.

  16. After Hubble ... by AncalagonTotof · · Score: 1

    ... the Space Bubble !
    Sorry, it's Friday, I'm tired ...

    --
    Totof
  17. Space Junk Delivery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, instead of space junk, entire Amazon wharehouses will be built in space.
    Get your packages space dropped to your doorstep.

  18. Unless... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    "Two kids in their dorm room cannot do anything interesting in space."

    What if their dorm room is in space? Then the possibilities are endless.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  19. I'm not convinced by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    I'm not convinced that space is the next internet. How is space going to bring more porn to the masses?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  20. Re:More IMMEDIATELY Useful: HAIR FOR THE BALD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OTOH, seeing what results a bad hair job can produce, I'm not so sure...

  21. can't pay for life support = legal to kill by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    can't pay for life support = legal to kill. As in legal to kick someone out of an air lock to there death.

    That is the GOP view of space

  22. 2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god, it's full of porn.

  23. Barrier to Entry Much? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> Space Can Be the New Internet

    Um...the thing that makes the Internet the Internet is that anyone with $100 or a computer can contribute something new, whether open source, artwork or, for a little more investment, hardware. Space has a significant barrier to entry that will keep the vast majority of us...er...grounded.

  24. can't have a golden age "soon" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    We've got to bootstrap our way into space before we can have a golden age thereof. We can't feasibly have a golden age of space until we're building spacecraft in space out of stuff we mined in space.

    We're going to have to have a boring age of mining before we can have a golden age of exploration.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:can't have a golden age "soon" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 for this comment. It's way too premature to be talking about a golden age, notwithstanding the very promising advances by SpaceX, Blue Origin and Orbital Sciences.

      Bezos lead-in comments are instructive. The networks of the USPS and the phone networks were built, and had existed for decades, before Amazon, Facebook, Google and all the rest were able to leverage that infrastructure. The promise of space travel, tourism, mining, colony establishment and all the rest need not wait for a space transportation network to exist for decades previously. However that space transportation network does need to precede any massive boom in space utilization.

      For instance, where are the low-cost, routine passenger space flights between Earth and Mars? Between Earth and the Moon? Between Earth and anywhere? We can set up one-off spaceflights, but these are custom bookings and that increases the barriers to using them. They are more expensive and more work to set up as a result.

      In order to get the space equivalent access to "two teenagers working on an internet dream out of a garage, and on a shoestring budget", you need low-cost, pre-scheduled spaceflights between Earth and somewhere interesting. Make it so that all a customer has to do is book a ticket. Anyone can go at any time. As soon as you need to have a budget of millions of dollars, and any space flight requires personally speaking to Elon Musk of SpaceX, or the President of the United Launch Alliance, then you know for certain that low--cost, low barrier space access does not exist.

      I exaggerate a little, but only a little. And we aren't "about to enter a golden age". That is some decades out yet.

      Do you know what we have a golden age of? Telescopes. Telescopes are in a golden age, without any doubt. We are able to build huge telescopes, each generation surpassing the superlatives of the previous, and the previous generations are often just a couple of years old prior. Furthermore project build failures for these remarkable instruments are rare, despite each new generation being on the cutting edge of technology. Our ability to create superlative telescopes has never been greater, going all the way back to Galileo.

      Just a partial list of the more recent scopes:

      - Keck (I and II);
      - Gemini (North & South);
      - Canada-France-Hawaii;
      - Square Kilometer Array;
      - Green Bank Telescope (re-built and enlarged just a few years ago);
      - Large Binocular Telescope (LBT);
      - Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST);
      - Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC);
      - South African Large Telescope (SALT);
      - Very Large Telescope array (VLT);
      - Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA);
      - James Webb Space Telescope (JWST);
      - Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST);

      Proposed, Likely to Proceed:
      - Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT);
      - Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT);
      - Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT);

      Given this list, even grandiose ideas like the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) sound semi-plausible.

  25. Economic benefits by sjbe · · Score: 1

    So now that the costs of research and experimentation have been paid for by the public, "entrepreneurs" are willing to step up and reap the profits?

    Yes! That's one of the great things about publicly funded research. It turns into economic benefit to society via technology transfer. You seem to be implying (wrongly) that this is somehow a bad thing. Quite the contrary - this is a hugely awesome good thing. It means tons of jobs, new industries, and economic benefits all around. It grows the economy. Keeping the research in a lab where it will do nothing would be pretty much the worst thing you could do with it because then you spend the money and get no economic benefit either.

    1. Re:Economic benefits by drsquare · · Score: 1

      You seem to be implying (wrongly) that this is somehow a bad thing.

      Most tax payers would consider it a bad thing if they had to pay for some expensive technology to be developed, just for some parasitic CEO to come along and use it for free and make billions.

  26. That's because Bezos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And pretty much all of his ilk are delusional, egocentric, flipping *morons*. He is like a thong made out of piison ivy, sandpaper, and laxitives (as I think half of the things these people say are just verbal diarrhea, and some of it sounds like it's coming out of their ass, not their brain. If you truly aren't on the spectrum, or metamucil, you really don't need to share every retarded thought that flies through your head. Also, neither money nor 'influence' are an indication of intelligence or character, genius). Troll me!

  27. Not enough space? by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

    "Two kids in their dorm room cannot do anything interesting in space."

    Obviously.

    The Wright brothers didn't create the aircraft in their dorm room - they needed a garage and wide areas in order to do their stuff. Plus they needed wealth, which two kids in their dorm room are much less likely to have nowadays. They need space to construct that sort of stuff, much more than what's needed to build a hot-rod or small aircraft.

    As for something interesting in space, the only things left is to colonize another planet (or moon), extract resources from the other planet, FTL jump to another system, etc. Two kids in the dorm room can't build the Lunar Cheese Extraction Facility, nor can they do hyperspace stuff.

    The two kids in the dorm room that are capable of designing improved rockets or space vehicles wouldn't be in the dorm room because they would have been hired by any company wanting to do the same type of work.

    1. Re:Not enough space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect example of fighting that last war. The dorm room/garage incubator was relevant to the development of the internet. So obviously, the next technological frontier must be explored in the exact same way!

      Cargo cult, anyone?

  28. Jeff Bezos has a grasp of the obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the internet came out we have been saying it is the wild wild west and as regulation gets implemented a next wild west will be space.

    Note: on trying to post this, Slashdot says "Slow Down Cowboy!"

  29. Stop making Jeff Bezos any richer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop buying from Amazon, Tesla or anyone else who wants to go out there and reap all of space for themselves.

  30. Taxes by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    How refreshing! The tax-dodging tycoon tells us its business could not have emerged without tax-subsided public services.