Slashdot Mirror


World Wildlife Falls By 58% in 40 years (bbc.com)

Global wildlife populations have fallen by 58% since 1970, BBC reports citing The Living Planet assessment by the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and WWF. The report adds that if the trend continues, the decline would reach two-thirds among vertebrates by 2020. The figures suggest that animals living in lakes, rivers and wetlands are suffering the biggest losses. Human activity, including habitat loss, wildlife trade, pollution and climate change contributed to the declines. From the report: Dr Mike Barrett. head of science and policy at WWF, said: "It's pretty clear under 'business as usual' we will see continued declines in these wildlife populations. But I think now we've reached a point where there isn't really any excuse to let this carry on. This analysis looked at 3,700 different species of birds, fish, mammals, amphibians and reptiles - about 6% of the total number of vertebrate species in the world. The team collected data from peer-reviewed studies, government statistics and surveys collated by conservation groups and NGOs. Any species with population data going back to 1970, with two or more time points (to show trends) was included in the study.

2 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. More condoms less climate change by Billly+Gates · · Score: -1, Troll

    I am sick and tired of climate change being mentioned in every story with no evidence to back it up?

    To me the solution to most problems is simple ... Less people!

    Why don't we give out condoms to lesser countries and give tax incentives in wealthier ones? Face it. The reason for habit loss is economic as people need housing, food, and cheap products that produce toxins. Immigration problems wouldn't be an issue if Latin Americans and Africans could find work at livable wages. When over supply of labor hits you get a dump on demand.

    When housing and food prices stabilize you get less demand to clear wooded areas for more subdivisions in former wooded areas. We as citizens get less air pollution and plastics in our seas too and more affordable housing and less out of work and migrant workers draining our resources. We all benefit.

    It is 2016 and no family should have 1 or 2 kids each!

    1. Re:More condoms less climate change by houstonbofh · · Score: -1, Troll

      The point is they are dying out due to human activity...

      Really? All of them? None at all died out for other causes? Or perhaps that key differentiation is overlooked in click bait scare articles today...