Slashdot Mirror


The FBI Spent Two Years Investigating An Online Cult That Didn't Exist (muckrock.com)

A two-year FBI investigation apparently centered on the satirical web site "GodHatesGoths". Long-time Slashdot reader v3rgEz writes: In 2005, the FBI launched an investigation into the "Church of the Hammer," a fundamentalist Christian sect which called for the wholesale slaughter of practitioners of the goth subculture. Two years later, the investigation was closed, on grounds that the Church didn't exist. The FBI's threat assessment detailed "an extremely right-wing Christian group that adheres to a Middle Ages Catholic text called the 'Malleus Malificarum.'" But MuckRock.com reports that "The Bureau's main source on the case was a goth who had engaged with members of the Church via their Yahoo Group...trying to dispel their misconceptions about the relationship between the subculture and Satanism." After two years of scouring through crime databases and making phone calls to the Salem police department, FBI investigators actually visited the GodHatesGoths web site -- which turned out to be a parody.

134 comments

  1. a successful parody by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    which is what they wanted them to think

    1. Re:a successful parody by JustOK · · Score: 1

      but you fooled them by not thinking! Brilliant!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:a successful parody by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      tally good show, old chap
      can i get a tax refund on that then, please, after all i paid for .. ah , no wait .. i dont live there, god dam americans have all the luck

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Re:Hillary for Prison 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IDIOT

  3. The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is incompetent.

    1. Re:The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is incompetent.

      No, they're CORRUPT.

      As in "no reasonable prosecutor" BULLSHIT to let Crooked Liar Felon Hillary! off.

    2. Re: The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you're saying is, the FBI is in like, the sweet spot of corruption, where they're corrupt enough to not prosecute her, but not corrupt enough to have not investigated in the first place? How convenient.
      And what about prosecuting Crooked Asshole Trump? Hate speech, death threats, conspiracy to commit crimes, fraud, tax evasion... just when you think the man couldn't get any more stupid, racist or misogynist, he opens his mouth again... Or a recording surfaces of him opening his mouth in the past... But OMG! Crooked Hillary sent and received emails, burn her on the spot!

      The douche himself says he could murder someone in broad daylight and his supporters would still vote for him; it's true, redneck white trash KKK members don't know any better, in fact they'd be more supportive of him if the victim were black, Hispanic, Muslim, female, democrat or gay. Meanwhile, Hillary could use her "God given right" to bear military assault rifles and shoot up an Orphanage for Cute Children, Puppies and Kitties, and her supporters would still vote for her because she'd still be the least worst option compared to Trump (but the NRA would love her too!).
      And Americans are too stupid in general to consider any other candidates because they all complain about how no one else will vote outside of those two, so it's just "throwing away my vote".

    3. Re:The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They let Rove, Cheney, and the RNC get away with all kinds of things like running a private mail server, leaking classified information to the press, facilitating bribery, etc. Were they corrupt then?

    4. Re:The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Obama administration is one of the LEAST corrupt and MOST competent in American history.

    5. Re:The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's explicit corruption where a leader is breaking a law to advance their own interests (at the expense of those they govern) and then there's implicit corruption where the leader achieves the same result - but without explicitly breaking any laws.

      So take healthcare. A while back I had some new funny looking moles that I wanted checked by a dermatologist. Well, living in the USA, I'm basically required to have the health insurance plan that my employer chooses for me. Now, maybe I just have a lame employer who chose a bad insurance company (Blue Shield of California) but it was two months of pointless bureaucracy for a five minute exam.

      First, I have to go to my primary care doctor to get a referral. And I've been assigned a doctor an hour drive both from where I work and where I live - even though both are in Los Angeles. Well, I phone up my primary care doctor's office and I'm told that it's basically impossible to get an appointment with the doctor himself but they can squeeze me in with a nurse practitioner in a couple weeks. Well, the nurse practitioner does give me the referral the rules are that it has to be sent to me in the mail from the insurance company. So that's another couple weeks of waiting. Then once the referral arrive in the mail, I spend an afternoon on the phone getting all the administrative errors resolved and finally get an appointment with the dermatologist for a month later. And then at the dermatologist, the dermatologist spend literally less than five minutes looking at my moles - after making me wait half an hour while he chatted up the pharmaceutical rep who was going to buy him and his office staff a free lunch the next week.

      Now, I can just walk into a McDonalds and and say "Give me a burger and fries", pay my money, and a few minutes later I'm out the door. And there's no fundamental medical or technological reason I couldn't just as well walk into a dermatologists office and say "Look at my moles.", pay my money, and a few minutes later I'm out the door. So why, instead, is it two months of bureaucracy and waiting to get that done? And why am I paying $1,000/month in insurance costs for less than five minutes of a dermatologists time?

      My answer, fundamentally, would be government bureaucracy. First, it sure looks to me like there's a serious shortage of medical doctors - as a result of US government bureaucracy artificially limiting medical school admissions. I mean, I get that not just anyone should be allowed to do something like brain surgery - but why try to decide who will be a good medical doctor before they've even set foot in a medical school? If the US government was really serious about maintaining quality in the medical profession, they would train up a lot of medical doctors and have an aggressive system of weeding out the bad ones on an ongoing basis; go through a nasty divorce and become an alcoholic? Boom, loose your license to practice medicine. Second, why is the insurance company blocking my access to healthcare with months of pointless bureaucracy? Well, obviously that's how they maximize their profits. Third, why is the pharmaceutical company spending money from their drug patents (artificial government monopolies) on free lunches for medical doctors - instead of doing more biomedical research? Well, because that's how they maximize their profits from the artificial government monopoly. And why is a country like the USA that supposedly believes in freedom of speech telling companies that they can't post useful health information on a website - or give people their genome sequence (which is fundamentally ones and zeros on a computer disk)?

      So the point is that certain people have become very rich and powerful as a result of government bureaucracy that serves little purpose other than to enrich those people. But these people are rich and powerful enough that going up against them and eliminating the bureaucracy that they benefit from could cost a politician an election. So the politicians pretend these issues don't exist - a lie by

    6. Re:The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Obama administration is one of the LEAST competent and MOST corrupt in American history.

    7. Re:The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO U

      (keep saying stuff that isn't true, but feels true to you)

    8. Re:The FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      So take healthcare. A while back I had some new funny looking moles that I wanted checked by a dermatologist. Well, living in the USA, I'm basically required to have the health insurance plan that my employer chooses for me. Now, maybe I just have a lame employer who chose a bad insurance company (Blue Shield of California) but it was two months of pointless bureaucracy for a five minute exam.

      It's not the insurance company, it's the type of plan in this case. Based on your description, it sounds like you have an HMO. Those plans are designed to have primary care physician gatekeepers to keep costs down, and you can thank Nixon for them. If you can get a PPO instead, you'll have less bureaucracy when getting to a specialist at the cost of higher premiums.

    9. Re: The FBI by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Comey clearly dislike some of the things Clinton did, but the mail server investigation did not turn up sufficient evidence to prosecute. Clinton had clearly been negligent with classified materials, but I found no examples of such negligence involving criminal prosecution.

      As far as Trump goes, I believe his fraud trial starts later this month. This is being done properly, in that the case is not publicized before the election.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re: The FBI by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sigh. The President directs the use of vast but limited resources, and this includes which laws to emphasize for investigation and prosecution. There's nothing criminal about it.

      The President can negotiate all he or she wants. A treaty isn't the law of the land until the Senate vote.

      The Iran negotiation was to get something out of a deteriorating diplomatic situation, and in my judgment is more likely to keep Iran from getting a nuke than continued US sanctions. It isn't treason. It could be a mistake, but not treason.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:The FBI by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I've never had problems with my HMO. I have to see my primary doctor for referrals or pay Tier 3 rates, but I can see him fast, frequently the next day, and I've never had a referral I though indicated turned down. I've been having some health issues, and not having to worry about insurance has been a real help. (I belong to Healthpartners in Minnesota.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  4. Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a Catholic text about witchcraft, after all. What better cult to investigate than Catholicism? If the leader of a cult like FLDS molest children, he rightly ends up on a most wanted list and eventually in prison. Warren Jeffs absolutely belongs in prison and all forms of LDS are creepy cults. But Catholicism seems to get a free pass, where clergy molest children and then are shielded by bishops or even by the Vatican. The clergy are shuffled around while allegations by victims are hushed. If the allegations get too loud, the clergy get recalled to the Vatican, where they can avoid foreign prosecution. Catholicism is a really big and really nasty cult that needs to be investigated and shut down. We'd solve a lot of the world's problems just by ridding ourselves of dangerous cults like Catholicism and Islam.

    1. Re: Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps in 2000 years people would be more understanding.

    2. Re:Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Yah, like the Church of the Subgenius. I'll even give them a link to the web site, so they don't need to spend two years looking for it: http://www.subgenius.com/

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    3. Re:Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by rickyslashdot · · Score: 1

      This may well be MOD'd as off-topic - BUT
      Eliminating any religion / cult / whatever does nothing effective to remove their influence, it merely drives them underground.

      Try this on for size - TAX the churches. It doesn't have to be much - say 10% of their 'take' as a reasonable start, since that is the same amount that the churches want in tithes. Imagine the benefit to society as a whole from this enormous wealth redistribution.
      As a side benefit to society, there would be fewer 'churches' scheming for church-status exemptions if they knew from the get-go that they WOULD be taxed, and that the rate could be set by whatever govt agency is responsible for taxes in their country.

      Granted, it could, and probably WOULD, be abused by certain govt's to suppress some religions, but, face it, there is abuse already rampant in all organized nation's governments.

      --
      redneck geek
    4. Re:Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      The Yearning for Zion Ranch was confiscated because of Jeffs crimes but for some reason Catholic churches don't get confiscated for the same crime.

    5. Re:Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, like the Church of the Subgenius. I'll even give them a link to the web site, so they don't need to spend two years looking for it: http://www.subgenius.com/

      How much time have the FBI and DHS wasted investigating The Jihad Against Barney?

      TV news once confused it with an actual jihadi website ("jihad" vs "jehad") and sent people to the address. TJAB got a large volume of hate mail from people who visited the website, saw the logo of crosshairs on Barney the Dinosaur, and still went through the contact form to yell at the roleplayers. Fun times.

      Captcha: heathen

    6. Re:Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      You don't have to do ANYTHING special. Simply allow whatever church to follow any existing tax law that isn't church specific.

      You'd think that most churches would fit just fine under existing not-for-profit organization types, except, of course, for the fact that religions tend to be very explicitly for-profit.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    7. Re:Perhaps the FBI should investigate real cults by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That's a vampire cannibalism cult, not just a vampire cult. I don't think it's really a zombie cult, as it claims return to life rather than undeath.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Next by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    Next, pastafarians and the church of the flying spaghetti monster.

    1. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't investigate a legitimate religion. That would be unconstitutional.

      Although, nothing stop them from investigating Anonymous. Of which i am the supreme leader and they never caught me yet! You will not be forgotten, nor forgiven. We are Anonymous. The deep web army.

    2. Re:Next by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can't investigate a legitimate religion

      Define legitimate religion...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Established religions in other words and ones that pre-date 1950 or something like that. The Church of the Sword attempted to gain tax exempt status in New Hampshire and they ruled against it in the highest court of the land (ie New Hampshire, not federal):

      http://www.sentinelsource.com/news/local/self-described-westmoreland-church-loses-its-appeal-in-the-state/article_76b7d703-e584-5b90-afad-392dbfb97516.html

    4. Re:Next by blindseer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Define legitimate religion...

      One that the speaker is a member.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    5. Re:Next by dbIII · · Score: 1

      One where there is not a clear paper trail leading back to a blatantly obvious scam.
      How's that for a start?
      The equivalent of renaming dog to God should not be enough to evade the law and scam people via a loophole.


      That's the low hanging fruit. Cults are more difficult. The early history of the Mormons and some of the evangelical groups makes it a bit difficult to show that new cults are not just there for the benefit of their leaders. There's a bunch in evangelical Christian guise near me that started just because the leader wanted to collect boys to fuck - including his own nephew. However the leader has passed on leaving a very popular if somewhat strange bunch that is very politically active (disturbingly so). Isn't it funny the someone who was fucking children was pushing hard for internet censorship? Cults do shit like that.

    6. Re:Next by roca · · Score: 1

      I think we can at least require that the religion's tenets be sincerely held by members and leaders alike. (In general; if some individuals disbelieve that needn't deligitimize the entire religion.)

      This implies that the members and leaders share the same tenets and generally means those tenets are publicly known, not secret.

    7. Re:Next by PPH · · Score: 1

      generally means those tenets are publicly known, not secret.

      Church of Scientology

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Next by LoztInSpace · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They can't investigate a legitimate religion

      Define legitimate religion...

      A religion is a large, popular cult. A cult is a small, unpopular religion.

    9. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One where there is not a clear paper trail leading back to a blatantly obvious scam.

      Which conveniently exonerates every religion that validates their "belief" in god/s with "scriptures". Sure, they are scams, but the paper trail can only be "unclear".

      I'm guessing your "test" made sense when you heard it in your head. Also, that you do/did a lot of cocaine and believe it did no damage...

    10. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, a cult is any secretive practice. A religion is open about what they believe.

    11. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... Mormons are definitely a religion. Do you know what they do in the super secret room in the Temples? Yeah, I didn't think you did. Nobody knows but them.

      The government gets ZERO say in religion or cult. The fact some of you assholes want them to get involved is .... sad.

      And nobody gets to "require" anything, you fucking communists.

      I'm so sick of hearing people say "I don't like X, let's get the government involved." Fuck you..

    12. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Roman Catholic - most of Vatican and Vatican archives are secret and off limits to the general public
      Scientology - most of their buildings and practices are not open to the public
      Jewish - parts of synagogues are not open to the public & maybe not even to their women
      Mormon - Interior of their temples and higher level rituals are off limits to the public
      Muslim - some sacred sites and interiors of Mosques are off limits to the public
      Global Warming - In public claim it is about the environment when in private is about control, power, and money
      USA Government - claim it is open and for the people; however, repeatedly withholds information, hides information, and Government Officials lies about the information and what they did (both Clintons)

    13. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try going to a Mormon church if you are not a member.

    14. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.

      How does that work then?

    15. Re:Next by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Do I have to spell out "Scientology" in big capital letters for you?
      Just because you didn't see the obvious or understand the rest is no reason to act as if I had a background like Glenn Beck.

    16. Re:Next by roca · · Score: 2

      is not a legitimate religion, yes.

    17. Re:Next by roca · · Score: 1

      The Vatican having some secrets doesn't negate the fact that every significant doctrine of Catholicism is public knowledge.

      Likewise, the inaccessibility of some parts of some synagogues and holy sites doesn't negate the fact that every significant doctrine of Judaism and Islam is public knowledge.

      Quite a big difference from Scientology and other cults where a lot of information about what the leaders believe is deliberately held back from potential converts.

    18. Re:Next by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Funny. I've been in dozens of different synagogues. I've never seen an area blocked off for religious reasons. (Locking up the Rabbi's office is just common sense.)

    19. Re:Next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One where there is not a clear paper trail leading back to a blatantly obvious scam.

      Which conveniently exonerates every religion that validates their "belief" in god/s with "scriptures". Sure, they are scams, but the paper trail can only be "unclear".

      Kinda like how you conveniently stopped reading after the first sentence. Or did the words "How's that for a start?" just confuse you?

    20. Re:Next by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      > Quite a big difference from Scientology and other cults where a lot of information about what the leaders believe is deliberately held back from potential converts.

      Not really. Information forms belief. There's a collection of books kept in the Popes own apartment that only Popes are ever allowed to see. There's tons of stuff that the Vatican actually does that is completely contrary to Christian doctrine.

    21. Re:Next by MercTech · · Score: 2

      Legitimate religions are the ones with either enough adherents or enough money to get enough legislators in their pocket.

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
    22. Re:Next by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm free and unarmed. That's one of the benefits of modern society.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    23. Re:Next by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The IRS is likely to investigate a church if they engage in political activity, such as recommending a candidate or political party. It's constitutional.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  6. Well, what did you expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Well, what did you expect from a bunch of government workers who into the bargain are working for an organization that is reported to be a veritable nest to Trump voters... intelligence?

    1. Re: Well, what did you expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that this is the narrative that this article is meant to progress.

    2. Re:Well, what did you expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As I suspected this is an FBI hit piece, related to the election.

    3. Re:Well, what did you expect... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      You know, I literally learned this from watching conservatives. When you can't challenge facts, challenge the reasoning of the facts.

  7. FBI investigating a cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should investigate teh Catholic Church.

    1. Re: FBI investigating a cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not send a few troops to raid the Vatican? I'd say to send some cruise missiles, but there's some art worth preserving despite of the creeps who live there

    2. Re: FBI investigating a cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a bomb that kills people and leaves goats standing.

    3. Re: FBI investigating a cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd say to send some cruise missiles,

      I prefer the idea of strapping Tom Cruise to a missile - no matter what the target, as long as it's launched.

    4. Re: FBI investigating a cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jerusalem is an Islamic holy city. So you're fine with flattening Jerusalem, too? If so, I'm with you...

      AC

    5. Re: FBI investigating a cult by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      ...they can't Mecca no more.

      A blatantly-obvious setup-and-pun joke gets a '-1' on Slashdot over some PC oversensitivity?

      I can see why comedians like Seinfeld won't tour colleges anymore.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  8. Perhaps not time wasted by whoever57 · · Score: 0

    Perhaps this isn't wasted time.

    Any time spent on this activity was time that was not available for activities such as persecuting people like Aaron Swartz.

    The FBI has been a corrupt organization since its founding. Any real criminals caught by the FBI are perhaps an aberration rather than the FBI performing its primary mission.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re: Perhaps not time wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, any time spent on Aaron Swartz was wasted, all they had to do was yell "boo!" and he would have hung himself, much quicker than going through the legal system.

    2. Re:Perhaps not time wasted by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      It's surprising how slow they are in real life. The guys on Criminal Minds would've wrapped this up in a 1 hour episode and had enough time left over to read all of HRC's emails.

    3. Re:Perhaps not time wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any real criminals caught by the FBI are perhaps an aberration rather than the FBI performing its primary mission.

      Harassing/silencing/killing US citizens that have a politically unpopular point of view pretty much is its primary mission. You have read the agencies history and list of scandals haven't you? The FBI is linked by circumstantial evidence to conspiracies to assassinate several politically unpopular people over the years, such as Martin Luther King Jr. They even publicly admit to creating terrorist plots so they can swoop in at the last minute and save the day.

  9. ALL secret government agencies are badly managed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on many years of infrequent information, I agree. The FBI is EXTREMELY badly managed, as are all the secret or mostly secret U.S. government agencies.

    Consider the situation: If a secret government agency does something destructive or stupid, the agency managers have many ways to hide their incompetence.

  10. you never know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even fake stuff can have consiquences look at slider man.

    1. Re: you never know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slider man? Is that the guy who patented "slide to unlock"? I think he's dead now.

    2. Re: you never know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably but its more than likely slender man. a purely internet created myth that some crazy girls did some wierd sacrifice to that ended up in a death. talk about triggered by a meme.

    3. Re: you never know by DMFNR · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about the Waukesha, WI case, the girl actually survived even though she was stabbed 19 times. Being from the area, it wasn't surprising. Most of the people around there practically get their news from internet memes. Ask any random stranger in a gas station here what stood out the most from the incident, they'll say, "It's really scary that Slenderman is still out on the streets".

  11. FBI is a cult by blibbo · · Score: 0

    ... of somewhat crazy people that waste time and money. An overly powerful, overly funded cult. As with many cults, I don't think I would want to work with/for an organization that gets in the news for so many ridiculous things so often.

    Hey America, why not vote for someone who's smart enough to do a cost-benefit analysis on the FBI and make changes? I don't know who, but it's probably not Trump or Clinton.

  12. This proves they hate the people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and support the rump.

  13. Not so surprising by sjames · · Score: 1

    They also investigated the Kingsmen's Louie Louie for 31 months for obscenity before deciding the lyrics were indecipherable.

  14. I had a similar experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FBI called me up asking about some website I had visited, thinking that it was related to Columbine. It turned out, they were investigating a website related to the tabletop RPG "Teenagers from Outer Space," which apparently the Columbine kids played and wrote about in one of their journals.

    In between gales of laughter, I told the agent that if he had any more leads on threats from role playing games that he should feel free to give me a call and I'd be happy to help out as best I could.

    1. Re:I had a similar experience... by lgw · · Score: 1

      The FBI called me up asking about some website I had visited, thinking that it was related to Columbine. It turned out, they were investigating a website related to the tabletop RPG "Teenagers from Outer Space," which apparently the Columbine kids played and wrote about in one of their journals.

      In between gales of laughter, I told the agent that if he had any more leads on threats from role playing games that he should feel free to give me a call and I'd be happy to help out as best I could.

      It wasn't so funny when they actually raided Steve Jackson Games when they were making a hacking-themed game. I wonder about the FBI - surely a portion of them are actually savvy about this sort of thing. Is it just some institutional bias against asking fellow agents who might be familiar with the subject at hand?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:I had a similar experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the Secret Service.

  15. If you want freedom you got to move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    http://www.freestateproject.org/

    Lot's of people are migrating for freedom to New Hampshire to take part in a movement to end tyranny and the state (short term goal is not secession, as that's more complicated, but rather to have an undue influence on politics via an over-active minority in the state- which should and has already led to more people liberty-loving folks migrating for the cause and a lot of positive impact on state and local politics; people are doing it and they live in New Hampshire):

    http://www.freekeene.com/
    http://www.freetalklive.com/
    http://www.shiresociety.com/

  16. Re: Hillary for Prison 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I talked to a homosexual once and got the AIDS. Now I cant stop sucking dick.

  17. The church switched to a for-profit model by Snufu · · Score: 1
  18. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They're BOTH. Why does it have to be one or the other?

  19. Re: Hillary for Prison 2016 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

    Mr Thiel, this is not the time nor place.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  20. Another Clinton Story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like just another day in the life of the Clintons.

  21. Spirit Cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This article has been posted to discredit the FBI, the revelation of the Democratic party's "Spirit Cooking" scandal, and the Clinton corruption investigations.

    1. Re:Spirit Cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post was was written to discredit Trump voters as bunch of whackadoodle conspiracy theorists.

    2. Re:Spirit Cooking by Calydor · · Score: 1

      But aren't they?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re:Spirit Cooking by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Your post was was written to discredit Trump voters as bunch of whackadoodle conspiracy theorists.

      Conspiracy theory: Straight out of the horses mouth with a paper trail, author, and events to go with it.

      In other news, channers were running around screaming "We love you Christ-chan" and "deus vult." FBI currently investigating all the way back to the 11th century for leads.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Spirit Cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The woman who invited Podesta to the spirit dinner is offering twitter follows if you just post her "666" hastag.
      https://twitter.com/AbramovicM666/status/713643403544817664
      Rich people are often extremely freaky. It doesn't take a conspiracist to point that out. I'm not going to vote these kind of freakitude back into power.

    5. Re:Spirit Cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Podesta's spirit dinner woman is into the whole "post 666 and I'll follow you on twitter" thing, because that's so mainstream progressive.
      https://twitter.com/AbramovicM666/status/713643403544817664
      Conspiracy? I think not.

    6. Re:Spirit Cooking by CommanderRyalis · · Score: 1

      The woman who invited Podesta to the spirit dinner is offering twitter follows if you just post her "666" hastag. https://twitter.com/AbramovicM... Rich people are often extremely freaky. It doesn't take a conspiracist to point that out. I'm not going to vote these kind of freakitude back into power.

      And I thought this whole thing was a typo, they really meant "Spirited cooking"

  22. Re:Hillary for Prison 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The burden of proof is on the accuser and the only things that have been documented are accusations.

    You might want to look up Watergate/rat-fucking and Lee Atwater to get a hint of why Hillary has the reputation she does today but you probably won't.

  23. I'm not sure I mind this by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a "2 year investigation" could easily just be somebody at the FBI keeping tabs on them to make sure it really is just harmless trolling. That's sorta what an investigation is. And befor you ask yes, I do want my law enforcement to keeping tabs of folks who go around advocating violence. It's not too hard to do it without violating anybody's rights and if we'd done a bit more of that perhaps that whole Sept 11 fracas coulda been avoided.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm not sure I mind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, someone at FBI quickly threw some info into a document and tossed it aside for two years. Someone finally picked it up, looked into it, noticed it was bunk, and closed it. Whooptydoo.

    2. Re:I'm not sure I mind this by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      a "2 year investigation" could easily just be somebody at the FBI keeping tabs on them to make sure it really is just harmless trolling.

      It could also be a spare time project that no one got to. One of those open investigations that ended up on the bottom of the pile in a last in first out approach. Then someone finally had a second to get to, it open it up, have a laugh, and close the case.

    3. Re:I'm not sure I mind this by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Right, someone at FBI quickly threw some info into a document and tossed it aside for two years. Someone finally picked it up, looked into it, noticed it was bunk, and closed it. Whooptydoo.

      This. Anyone who is reassured by this is a dumbass because we have learned that 1) the FBI will open a file without any legitimate provocation and 2) the FBI leaves these bullshit files open for years without addressing them, meaning that legitimate hate groups can hide in the noise.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I'm not sure I mind this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah +1 if I started an extremist cult and was worried it was getting too much attention, I might say "it was all a parody" until things cooled down. The follow up in CO and MA was good investigative work. Imagine if investigators gave up on seeing that the site's a parody, and later discovered the arsons and poisonings were real.

  24. The have quite the track record ... by quax · · Score: 1

    ... of investigating none existing crimes.

    Just saying.

  25. ./ supporting conspiracy theories now by bongey · · Score: 1

    A vast right wing Russian, KGB/FSB, FBI conspiracy to steal the election from Clinton.

    Good thing there is 3 days to go.

    1. Re:./ supporting conspiracy theories now by JustNiz · · Score: 0

      lol I think you need put that doobey down now.

  26. Comeyites by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Oh join me fellow Comeyites, to give the iPhone a holy back door like God has asked of his followers, per Galatians 8:12. For God needeth space ships and God needeth back doors.

  27. Re:Hillary for Prison 2016 by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2

    >Hillary fed the FBI tons of false leads so they wouldnt notice her corrupt deals.

    Fortunately, an email by a tech saying he was part of the Clinton coverup operation was ruled a joke by the FBI.

    (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user230519/imageroot/2016/09/24/20160924%20-%20Hillary%20Coverup%20Operation.jpg)

    I wonder why it took them so little time to decide that was a joke, but took two years on these guys.

  28. No clue, no sense of humour by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    Yup, just the FBI honouring its founder - looking for monsters under beds and, when they don't find any, trying to create them. Helluva make-work project.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  29. Re: Hillary for Prison 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You too, huh? Umm, wanna meet?

  30. I Feel Much Safer Now by littlewink · · Score: 1

    Don't publish this too much further - the FBI is already embarrassed by/about the Clinton investigation.

    Revealing this would make them laughingstocks of law enforcement for a decade to come.

  31. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we are relying on them to determine about Hillary's emails and Donald's links to Russia? jesus christ help us all.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah so, the Narrative is revealed!

  32. Re:Hillary for Prison 2016 by ooshna · · Score: 1

    I'd honestly doubt many man hours were spent on this. Probably just forgotten till someone noticed. They check the site see its fake and close it. The only reason we are hearing about this is because of the whole #SpiritCooking thing. Plus this author has just been submitting muckrock.com links for 2 years dozens and dozens. Not sure if human or bot to be honest.

  33. I'm not sure you used your mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you (and I suspect, many of the people who gave you karma) had actually read the article, which contains excerpts from files of the investigation, you would know that it was not the FBI keeping tabs on anyone, it was a "threat assessment". From one of those files: "Writer could not locate via open sources (Internet, [etc]) any information to substantiate the existence of Rev. Green or the church." From a subsequent file dated 2 years (I think muckrock typoed the year) after the writer was assigned to it: "Writer went to godhatesgoths.com, the website produced by "Rev. Green"..."

    Knowing about something before talking about it is sorta what common courtesy is. And before you ask, yes I do want people in the forums I visit to read articles before commenting on them. It's not hard to do it (or simply keep your mouth shut if you haven't) without making a fool of yourself. If you and people like you, and the FBI do a bit more of it perhaps stupid posts, irrelevant assumptions about what other people may or may not ask, rights and Sept 11, as well as wasteful investigations could be avoided.

  34. I'm not sure you used your mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you (and I suspect, many of the people who gave you karma) had actually read the article, which contains excerpts from files of the investigation, you would know that it was not the FBI keeping tabs on anyone, it was a "threat assessment". From one of those files: "Writer could not locate via open sources (Internet, [etc]) any information to substantiate the existence of Rev. Green or the church." From a subsequent file dated [b]2 years[/b] (I think muckrock typoed the year) after the writer was assigned to it: "Writer went to godhatesgoths.com, the website produced by "Rev. Green"..."

    Knowing about something before talking about it is sorta what common courtesy is. And before you ask, yes I do want people in the forums I visit to read the articles before commenting. It's not hard to do it (or simply keep your mouth shut if you haven't) without making a fool of yourself. If you and people like you, and the FBI do a bit more of it perhaps stupid posts, irrelevant associations about what other people may or may not ask, rights and Sept 11, as well as wasteful investigations could be avoided.

  35. Re:ALL government agencies are badly managed. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    Fixed that title for ya.

  36. Not the first time by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Back in the late 80s or mid 90s, I forget exactly when, police and the FBI spent years assembling a massive chart of where, when, and how Satanists met, stole, and ate human babies. Guess what: that never happened either. And that whole thing was pre-Internet-as-we-know-it. They had to come up with that shit based on verbal rumor and wishful thinking.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    1. Re:Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There was even that agent, in the 90s who was specifically assigned to look into the cases that were obviously reported by crazy people. A lot of people thought it was pretty wasteful of the FBI, but I think it was one rare point of government efficiency. Have one guy deal with all of the crazy bullshit, and let the rest of the agents do the REAL investigating... Oh, and have him take that mouthy redhead from the morgue with him!

  37. Fan Belt Inspectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a reason the local police often have nicknames like the above for the FBI, and it isn't all jurisdictional jealousy...

  38. Next Up by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    They should investigate the Ordo Malleus, I hear they do racial cleansing and such. Really nasty stuff.

    1. Re:Next Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have authorization from the Holy Orders of the Emperor's Inquisition to open such an investigation. Disobedience would be Heresy.

      You aren't being Heretical.... are you citizen?

  39. #gamergate update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminder that the FBI start an investigation of the notorious Gamergate roughly two years ago as well. Perhaps its time for Muckrock to submit another FOIA on the status of the investigation.

  40. there is a cult called cabal rich and influencial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see Podesta emails SpiritCooking? lady gaga, J-Z, plenty at the white house partake in unsavory ceremonies. those who try to daylight them suicide=murdered
    In today's news: FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide http://denverguardian.com/2016/11/05/fbi-agent-suspected-hillary-email-leaks-found-dead-apparent-murder-suicide/

    Obama is in it too! He is leaning on Dept of Justice Not to Dig! Anthony VVeiner and Donald Trump= two pricks who saved us from the Hildebeast :)

    "do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" { Aleister Crowley's Book of the Law = how to do rituals drink elixir to 'bring forth the Bohemoth
    I checked the spelling Bohemoth: LooK what someone posted in wikipeda on Nov4th: " World government in fiction
    scurrilous novel New Shoes, RD Le Coeur has the president of earth as BernadoBohemothBeelzebub who the alien visitors come seeking on Earth. ISBN978-1-84923-882-3
    15 KB (2,082 words) - 14:46, 4 November 2016
    Now we know why after talking in private to Pope Francis John Boehner quit being Speaker of the House!

    WHO SUPPORTS HILLARY CLINTON IS ON THE SIDE OF EVIL - WHETHER THEY KNOW IT OR NOT IS A QUESTION WE NEED TO ASK

  41. Society for Creative Anachronism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At one time the Society for Creative Anachronism (SCA), a medieval reenactment group, was tracked by the FBI because they thought it was "The Society for Creative Anarchy" instead. Considering that the messages going back and forth among members often invite involved plotting against other "kingdoms", waging war, building medieval war machines, swords, armor, etc. you can maybe appreciate where they were coming from :-) Fortunately, one of their agents was a member or had kids that were members.

    1. Re:Society for Creative Anachronism by MercTech · · Score: 1

      The song to google is "True Story"

      Harmless historical nuts
      Who wear boiler plate on their butts
      Who dress up in clothes from the twelfth century
      To bash on each other with sticks and debris
      And make up the world's largest private army
      Harmless historical nuts

      --
      NRRPT/RCT
  42. Diverting FBI from their regular work by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    And this is a bad thing, why, exactly?

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  43. WOW, maybe if the FBI would actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    READ the wikileaks e-mails they might find the one of John Podesta going to a satanitst/wiccan (sorry, cults are not my thing and I forget which it was) ceremony and THAT might be what it takes to get those idiots to look at the REST of the content and start counting all the felonies that they would pursue with a fervor if committed by Hillary Smith or Hillary Jones.

    Who knew that it would be crazy religious nonsense that get them to spend time and manpower "investigating"... of course, then we get to the secondary issue of COMPTENECE and I'm afraid we're all screwed...

  44. Took two years? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Either they were real thorough or they're really slow.

  45. Call for you, Directory Comey. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From someone named Nathan Poe.

  46. Re:Hillary for Prison 2016 by Maritz · · Score: 1

    You don't prove claims false, especially something posted without evidence. Assert without evidence, expect to be dismissed without evidence. Go on then, off you fuck.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  47. Oh, the competence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With results like this, it's NO WONDER they were about to examine over 650,000 emails in under 690,000 seconds.

    I have to say, I feel safe knowing such solid and intelligent investigators are out there looking out for our best interests.