Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Charged With Fraud After 'Stealing' In-game FIFA Currency (cnet.com)

The FBI said it believes a group of hackers made millions off a scam to defraud publisher Electronic Arts. From a report on CNET: A US man is facing felony wire fraud charges for the theft of digital currency from game developer Electronic Arts. According to an FBI indictment, Anthony Clark and his co-defendants are being charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud for "stealing" in-game currency in multiplayer football game FIFA Ultimate Team for Xbox One, PS4 and PC. The indictment details that Clark and three others, named as Ricky Miller, Nicholas Castellucci and Eaton Zveare, members of hacking group RANE Developments, designed an app using the game's source code and developer kit. This app fraudulently told EA's servers that thousands of matches had been completed in the game. These completion reports were rewarded with FIFA coins, which the group sold to what the FBI called "black market" coin dealers. Between them, the group earned $15-$18 million.

149 comments

  1. They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were able to do this because they were SMART!

    --The Don

    1. Re:They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So smart that they used their initials as part of the name of their hacking group...oh, the humility!

    2. Re:They were able to do this because... by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, they were able to do this because EA was dumb. Never trust state information that the client is giving you in a networked game or at the very least sanity check it occasionally if its not feasible to do everything server-side. Anyone who played MMOs or shooters back in the 90's probably has fond memories of all the crazy hacks people could use because the server would just accept whatever data the client sent.

    3. Re: They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      besides, "in-game" currency is an unlawful fraud to begin with.

    4. Re: They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was this a 90s problem? The problem then was too much information being sent to the client enabling things like radar or wall hacks. Client latency didn't affect anyone but yourself.

      I'm talking about netquake/quakeworld, tribes, quake engine games etc. Nothing else mattered in the 90s, seriously.

      Offloading collision detection to clients in a huge distributed game is a modern thing. It's more scalable and a better experience, but it has a ways to go...

      State of the art in the 90s was everything ran on server time, and clients did their best to predict what the server was going to tell them.

    5. Re: They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem then was too much information being sent to the client enabling things like radar or wall hacks.

      Player locations were updated based on proximity, regardless of whether a wall was in the way or not because the wall might be destructible, permeable or a detail.

      State of the art in the 90s was everything ran on server time, and clients did their best to predict what the server was going to tell them.

      That wasn't state of the art, it was the norm. Most multiplayer games in the 90s did it this way.

    6. Re: They were able to do this because... by Sowelu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If these points were 'earned' from playing games, then it sounds like they're not much different from winning tickets at a Skee-Ball machine. If the publisher decides to gate content behind them, I don't see how that's even the slightest bit unethical. They create content and then limit access to it.

      This seems a lot like printing your own skee-ball reward tickets, using them to "buy" passes to the exclusive backroom pinball arcade, then selling them on Ebay. You obtained a thing through deception, and everyone in the transaction agrees that the thing has value. How isn't that fraud?

    7. Re: They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except skeeball tickets are physical items that require real money to purchase. This video game shit is just points, no different than a score in Pac-Man.

    8. Re: They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a tip on ethics: it's normative and never objective. If sufficient people are upset by an act, that is unethical.

    9. Re: They were able to do this because... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Except skeeball tickets are physical items that require real money to purchase. This video game shit is just points, no different than a score in Pac-Man.

      Obviously they weren't just point sinces they were able to sell them and make $15 million. I'd sure like some of those "points."

      BTW, your reference to Pac-Man makes it clear to everyone that you are up on the bleeding edge of today's technology.

    10. Re: They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your second paragraph is tilting at windmills.

      You gonna say that I'm not up to date on the latest drivel on urban dictionary for that old phrase?

    11. Re: They were able to do this because... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Your second paragraph is tilting at windmills.

      When speaking about online currencies, gold farming and gaming APIs, if the best analogy you can come up with is a pac-man score, yeah, you don't get it.

    12. Re:They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Ultima Online. Pass a check to someone, walk back and forth across a server line, take both checks to bank and cash them, getting a new set of checks (they would have identical unique IDs that would erase a copy the next day), and repeat.

    13. Re: They were able to do this because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then everything is unethical because there are sufficient people in the world who would be upset by anything you do.

  2. Got Greedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should have stopped after only a couple of million?

  3. $15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Huckleberry_Hell_Raz · · Score: 2

    If real, that is more lucrative than most apps that are developed!

    1. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      why is this fraud?

    2. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fraud is deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain. How is it not fraud?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by H3lldr0p · · Score: 2

      Well, who did they deceive? The blurb says that everything was done through the game's API. If EA wasn't keeping track of how often games were reporting as being finished, how is this an exploit or deception? AFAICT, everything was done out in the open. So it goes back to how is this deception?

    4. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really? I mean really? Is English a second language for you? They were telling the system that games were played which had not been played.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Rei · · Score: 1

      At the very least, their API was terrible if it permitted this.

      --
      It's times like this I wish I had a friend named 'The Professor'.
    6. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by nikhilhs · · Score: 1

      What is the value of the FIFA Coins? Is there a line in the TOS that says the Coins have no value? I will laugh if this gets thrown out on a technicality of value of virtual currencies.

    7. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by jandrese · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My guess is that it was the part where they sold the coins to other people knowing full well that EA could revoke the coins or terminate the accounts of anyone who bought them.

      But yeah, the actual crime of writing a bot to farm coins seems more like a TOS violation than a felony. Punishment should probably be limited to getting kicked out of the game and never being allowed back online. Maybe even kicked out of EA online servers entirely.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    8. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But is deceiving a computer fraud?
      What if my level 14 thief steals an dagger from an NPC?
      What if I sell that dagger to another player for real money?
      What's the functional difference between game rules and an API?
      A clickthrough ToS?

    9. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

      Isn't the real fraud here committed by E.A. in converting real money to worthless in-game "money"?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    10. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Neither TFS or TFA use the term API, or the phrase Application program interface. What it says is "designed an app using the game's source code and developer kit". The app was not part of the game, and was not commissioned by the owners of the game. The purpose of the app was to report the completion of matches that never happened, purely for the self enrichment of the app developers. If someone tells you they will pay you X to dig a hole at a certain location, and you report back to them that you have completed the task (having not done the task at all) and you collect your wage for said task, that is fraud. It does not make it OK if you got paid by someone who did not verify that the task was or was not in fact completed before paying you... still fraud.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    11. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/fraud

      Fraud: A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading allegations, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to her or his legal injury.

      >What if my level 14 thief steals an dagger from an NPC?

      No, an NPC has no legal rights.

      >What if I sell that dagger to another player for real money?

      No fraud, because an NPC has no legal rights and thus it is not stealing to take from them.

      >What's the functional difference between game rules and an API?

      API connects to servers which you don't own, which are governed by rules that you didn't set, and have property that is effectively owned by someone with legal rights. For example, $15 million dollars owned by EA.

      >A clickthrough ToS?

      Partly. Also the fact that EA (a legal entity that has the legal right to ownership) owns the stuff and not an NPC (A fictional entity that has zero legal rights, even fewer than lab rats have).

    12. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money is worth what people are willing to exchange it for, whether in terms of goods, services, or other forms of currency. There is no fundamental difference between "real" money and in-game money in that respect. If people are willing to exchange "real" money for in-game currency, then there is an exchange rate between the two, and thus a measurement of relative value, and the in-game currency cannot be said to be worthless.

    13. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fraud is deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain. How is it not fraud?

      Because it didn't really happen in our universe. It virtually happened within a nested universe. It's a game, not real life. The "gain" is virtual.

      What's next? "You murdered that other player in the gladiator wave of Joust!" or maybe "Hey, someone came to my Clash of Clans base and stole some of my gold and elixer!" or maybe "you solicited sex for money in Leisure Suit Larry!"

      Congress coins money; EA does not. What happens to EA currency isn't real. He should be charged for fraud (or justice dispensed however they do it) within the virtual universe, not within ours. If you kill me in Joust, I just kill you back (as deterrent; is 3000 points worth my wrath?); I don't go crying to mama outside of the game. And if I do go crying to mama, mama's job is to tell me to settle the fuck down.

      If you start getting confused about the nesting within universes, you're going to cause a lot of problems and paradoxes. I will eat YOUR dots, Pac-msauve. Don't, and don't legitimize those who do.

    14. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe I would check that the work was completed as requested and as stated, then pay based on that inspection.

    15. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe even kicked out of EA online servers entirely."

      I thought you wanted to punish them?

    16. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      But is deceiving a computer fraud?

      Someone is facing 30 years in prison for deceiving High Frequency Trading algorithms. These guys allegedly sold $15-$18 million worth of FIFA coins they obtained by deceiving EA's algorithms. If they'd just harvested a few hundred dollars worth of FIFA coins for their own use, probably nobody would have noticed or cared, but when you do it for profit and millions of dollars are involved, you can bet it's going to be considered a crime.

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    17. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is deceiving a computer fraud?

      Yes.

      We know, and you know, that there's a clause in their contract that would prohibit this type of activity. We're not wasting time to cite it because we know it's there. If you go through it and can tell us, in your expert lawyerly opinion, that it's actually not there and this is totally 100% allowed in their Terms, then holy shit, call me out on it. But otherwise, stop wasting our damn time. Your example is crap.

      btw, Intent has meaning in the Court.

    18. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by 91degrees · · Score: 1
      But is deceiving a computer fraud?

      YES! This is exactly what computer fraud is!

      What if my level 14 thief steals an dagger from an NPC?

      Depends on the nature of the game and the real world value of the dagger.

      What if I sell that dagger to another player for real money?

      If you cheated then it's potentially fraud. If you didn't then it's not.

      What's the functional difference between game rules and an API?

      The game rules give the intent. The API gives the actual results. Breaching the game rules is what makes it potentially fraud.

      A clickthrough ToS?

      Doubt the rules and the TOS would be seen as significantly different.

    19. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Drethon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fraud is deliberate deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain. How is it not fraud?

      Because it didn't really happen in our universe. It virtually happened within a nested universe. It's a game, not real life. The "gain" is virtual.

      What's next? "You murdered that other player in the gladiator wave of Joust!" or maybe "Hey, someone came to my Clash of Clans base and stole some of my gold and elixer!" or maybe "you solicited sex for money in Leisure Suit Larry!"

      Congress coins money; EA does not. What happens to EA currency isn't real. He should be charged for fraud (or justice dispensed however they do it) within the virtual universe, not within ours. If you kill me in Joust, I just kill you back (as deterrent; is 3000 points worth my wrath?); I don't go crying to mama outside of the game. And if I do go crying to mama, mama's job is to tell me to settle the fuck down.

      If you start getting confused about the nesting within universes, you're going to cause a lot of problems and paradoxes. I will eat YOUR dots, Pac-msauve. Don't, and don't legitimize those who do.

      "Between them, the group earned $15-$18 million."

      This appears to be real world cash they netted, at this point it has left the game world.

      Though if selling imaginary world things for real world cash isn't fraud, I have a great vacation home in middle earth to offer you!

    20. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer fraud requires that a person is not authorized, or exceeds their given authorization, for their fraud. In this case they were authorized to use use the API. Courts have said a ToS violation isn't exceeding authorization.

      EA made the API.
      EA allowed others to use the API.
      API was used as written.

    21. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      I realize that California does things a little differently, but it sounds like they used real money for these transactions:

      The FBI seized a home in California, over $3 million from several accounts listed under the names of all four defendants, and several cars.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    22. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is deceiving a computer fraud?

      Deceiving the people who own the computer is fraud, yes.

      What if my level 14 thief steals an dagger from an NPC?

      If you use established game mechanisms to steal the dagger, then it's not really "stealing" in the prosecutable legal sense. Any more so than baseball players "stealing" a base can be brought up on larceny charges.

      If you're authorized to do something, it's not theft. ... And I'll stop you there, because "authorization" in a computer sense is *not* the same as "authorization" in a legal sense. Heck, the presence of a computer (as opposed to a person) doesn't factor into the legal determination of "authorization". For instance, if you show the bank security guard a fake ID and he waves you through, you're still not "authorized" (in the legal sense) to take the money from the vault - even if said security guard sees you do it and tells you "good night" as you leave with the cash. So having a computer permit you to do something doesn't necessarily mean that you're authorized-in-a-legal-sense to do it.

      What if I sell that dagger to another player for real money?

      Currently a legal gray area. At the very least it probably violates the terms of service for the website.

      The gray area comes in with the fact that in order to legally be able to sell something, you have to have ownership of it. Depending on how the law views the in-game item, you might not actually have (legal) ownership of the in-game item. That is, the law may view access to the virtual item as being owned and controlled by the owner of the game server - particularly if the TOS prohibit real-world trading. You might have obtained the rights to the use of the item in the context of the game from the game operators, but that doesn't necessarily equate to having true resale-able ownership of the item. For example, the TOS prohibitions on real-world trading may apply: you get the use of the item, so long as it's within the TOS. Some grants of use are transferable, some are not. It's entirely up to the owner (e.g. the operator of the game server) to determine the restrictions under which you can use the item.

      At any rate, if you obtained the dagger through (out-of-game) deception, even if the license grant from the game operators permits real-world trading, then you haven't properly entered into the license and would thus not have the rights to participate in real-world trading of the item. Thus (knowing you don't have free and clear rights to resell the item), you're committing fraud against the person you're selling it to, in addition to the fraud you committed to obtain it.

      What's the functional difference between game rules and an API?

      In practice? Intent. Fraud in large part is defined by intent. If you intend to deceive the other person - that is, lie to them to get them to do something they wouldn't normally do - then it's fraud. If you didn't intend to be deceitful, then it's not fraud. (You don't necessarily get to keep goods thus obtained, but it's not fraud for you to have obtained them.)

      If you find a loophole in the API, and intentionally exploit it - despite knowing it's against the rules of the game - then you've committed fraud.

    23. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or in other words, I don't get to take your TV just because you forgot to lock your front door. ("The doorknob authorized my entry!")

    24. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe those hackers should be sent to a virtual prison for some virtual hard time.

      Was it theft if the coins never existed in the first place? Shouldn't this be considered "mining" instead?

      If the value of these coins really can be considered real money, shouldn't EA be paying income taxes on the billions and billions of coins that they've been virtually holding on to? Can't someone go after them for tax evasion? (Of course they could weasel out of it by paying in EA coins. I'd love to be able to pay my taxes in monopoly money too!)

      Is the games deterministic, or is there an element of chance? If so, EA is running an illegal gambling operation, right?

      If our government is treating EA's play money as equivalent of real money, shouldn't EA's play money be considered a bank note, EA considered a bank, an regulated as such?

      A slippery slope they slide upon indeed. Our legal system is horked.

    25. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      crime of writing a bot to farm coins

      If the both actually played FIFA games, then yeah, I too might call it a "bot" to farm coins. But the bot didn't actually play the games. It just lied, and said it played the games. That sounds closer to fraud.

    26. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      They were authorized to use the API. But it should have been obvious to them that this was not the way the API was intended to be used.

      Or maybe it isn't obvious, but I'm sure that the prosecution will be arguing that it was.

    27. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 1
      They didn't steal those $15-$18 million from EA, though. They got that money from other players. If they didn't deliver on the virtual coins, then yes, that would be fraud. If the virtual coins arrived as paid for, it wasn't fraud.

      Let me put it another way. Let's say I sell my World of Warcraft account to another player. It violates Blizzard's TOS, but it's not illegal. I may have also obtained the characters on that account through illicit means - using bots. Again, that's not illegal (maybe a DMCA case could be made for it - I'm not familiar - but it's not fraud). Substitute WoW characters obtained through hacks for virtual currency obtained through hacks, and here we are.

      Though if selling imaginary world things for real world cash isn't fraud, I have a great vacation home in middle earth to offer you!

      This is entirely how many games make their money. Is League of Legends fraud?

    28. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Fraud does not necessarily have to involve monetary gain.

    29. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      no
      what about if say to your when though a toll lane that was closed as the ETC hardware was not working working in that lane so you when not billed and after the fact we went to the tape. But the toll way failed to cone it off / put up the right X light.

      They can try to say that you where not authorized to be in that line and you need pay the toll + a fine as you failed to pay on line / tell about the missing tolling But in court that may not hold up and it will be very hard to say it's hacking .

      But with this on line things with you used a URL on website our site to get past the log in system / pay wall with out even trying to hack any thing. As been listed as hacking in a court.

    30. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      But is deceiving a computer fraud?

      No, not at all!

      I mean, if I manage to deceive my bank's computer into depositing $100,000,000 into my account, well that's just totally legal!

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    31. Re: $15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck did I just read. Either I had a stroke or you need to try harder.

    32. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by I4ko · · Score: 1

      You mean any guy who ever picked up any girl any place in the universe is guilty of fraud?

    33. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by tattood · · Score: 2

      For example, $15 million dollars owned by EA.

      Unless players can also purchase coins from EA (which I don't think you can do), then they didn't steal $15 million from EA. They sold the coins on the black market to other players who used the coins to get whatever you can get from the EA store. If you google "FIFA Ultimate Team coins" you will find a hundred sites where you can purchase coins.

      This is no different than the gold farmers in World of Warcraft, except they found a way to get coins much quicker than you could from gold farming.

      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    34. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Like when you told her it was 12 inches, but it was really only 4.

    35. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I really don't see the distinction there. Are you saying if the bots had to actually simulate the inputs and play a perfect game against one another for the purposes of farming coins it wouldn't be fraud? I'm still not sure I accept that it is fraud in any case. If this is fraud how is it not fraud when someone steals from the bank in Monopoly? Little brothers everywhere would be in so much trouble.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    36. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      yup bad API not fraud.

    37. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      real money vs FIFA coins which have no value from the manufacturer... as in you can;t buy them from EA

    38. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      also is EA out that money (18 mil?) or just some tokens that you can;t buy from EA

    39. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      also what is the value of FIFA money to EA

    40. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      10000000000000000000 in FIFA money is worth what to you?

    41. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      if FIFA money has real value, are they being taxed on it.

    42. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by zlives · · Score: 1

      again my question is FIFA money is valid tender?!! if so are they giving out 1090's or w2's

    43. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Though if selling imaginary world things for real world cash isn't fraud, I have a great vacation home in middle earth to offer you!

      Lord Of The Rings Online has already beat you to it!

      http://www.lotrolife.com/img/quests/housing/thorin_hall_homesteads.jpg
      -and-
      http://lotro-wiki.com/index.php/housing

    44. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting one...

      It might make sense for the accused to claim TOS violation instead. EA do crack down on trading, after all, and will happily take in-game money from people if they believe they've been cheating. It would be a little perverse to do this if they actually believe the coins have value.

    45. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My guess is that it was the part where they sold the coins to other people knowing full well that EA could revoke the coins"

      I'm pretty sure they refunded anyone who had problems. They are not doing anything unique. This has been done in all online, MMO, RPG games ad infinitum.

      What's next? Charge all chinese farming items in WoW and other popular games with fraud? Most of these gold/item farmers use tools that are against ToS of the game - tools that automate actions, multiple accounts, etc. This is ridiculous. The only thing they should be able to charge them with is if they didn't pay taxes on profit.

    46. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Because it didn't really happen in our universe. It virtually happened within a nested universe. It's a game, not real life. The "gain" is virtual.

      Nope. Definitely happened in our universe That's how we know about it. It happened on a network located at least in part in the US; hence the FBI's involvement.

      Fraud can be for anything of value, even if the value is just perceived. If I trick you into giving me 10000 Swiss Francs then it's fraud. If I trick you into giving me a first edition Harry Potter, it's fraud.

    47. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by ADRA · · Score: 1

      "On February 1, 2008, Blizzard Entertainment, the makers of World of Warcraft, won a lawsuit against In Game Dollar, trading under the name Peons4Hire. The court ordered an injunction that immediately halted all business operations within said game.[37]"
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://www.techdirt.com/artic...

      Yes, exactly like Gold farming. Both are violations of the TOS, and one could argue that stealing something of value (even if constrained by their applicable uses) by using external tools is a pretty safe ground for fraud. I may have rot13 security on my content, but someone breaking it without permission is still most likely committing a crime under DMCA. The crime could've been amazingly elaborate, or stupidly simple. The outcome of said crime is the same. Fraud with a computer is wire fraud. So, if in fact the defendant was issued something of value through deception, I could see this having some merit. Gold farmers are just as culpable of this, especially if its facilitated through the use of outside tools.

      --
      Bye!
    48. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with tender, anything of value (i.e. convertible to or exchangeable for something else of value) can be involved in fraud. Jack traded the family cow for some magic beans. There was no fraud because the beans were in fact magic... they also took Jack down a path of crime that ended in a perfectly normal giant being killed for trying to defend his home and property... but still no fraud involved... just burglary and murder. Had the beans been fake, THAT would have been fraud.

      All money is in fact symbols just like FIFA money. Some is hard (gold and what not) and some is numbers in a computer, but it is the agreement that there is value that allows these things to be used as a medium of exchange. One could argue that obtaining FIFA money outside the terms of service may not be fraud, but once conversion takes place the perpetrators have themselves to blame for creating the condition of fraud.

      TFA states: "The FBI seized a home in California, over $3 million from several accounts listed under the names of all four defendants, and several cars." None of those assets were obtained directly with FIFA money, once conversion occurs it's a whole new game, and wire fraud was added because they did the conversion on-line. BTW, this is filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, not someplace where the jurors are likely to be tech savvy or even geek friendly.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    49. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though if selling imaginary world things for real world cash isn't fraud, I have a great vacation home in middle earth to offer you!

      I have one too. In LOTRO.

    50. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't particularly think hacking should be illegal particularly given the nature of the internet. People need to take responsibility for themselves and get whatever protection is sufficient to thwart whatever the risk is which they aren't willing to accept.

    51. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by bhiestand · · Score: 2

      Though if selling imaginary world things for real world cash isn't fraud, I have a great vacation home in middle earth to offer you!

      If online currency and items have real-world cash value, I'd like to see EA defend the illegal gambling in most of their games.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    52. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Dude it is a digital simulation and they were just simulating the simulation being played ;D. Are you saying that was one layer of simulation too much, I struggle to see it beyond civil suit. Post simulation trade of virtual toy currency into real currency, is neither here nor there. All the did was cheat computer cycles into creating virtual outcomes.

      Keep in mind this is really, really, dangerous territory and quite a dangerous precedent. Corporations can create any kind of digital evidence they wish, for any reason they wish and should this be used as sole evidence of a crime, then any person the corporations considers a deplorable is under threat.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    53. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Well, who did they deceive? The blurb says that everything was done through the game's API. If EA wasn't keeping track of how often games were reporting as being finished, how is this an exploit or deception? AFAICT, everything was done out in the open. So it goes back to how is this deception?

      So, let's get this straight. You argument is that since the supposed victim didn't immediately identify the exploit, there's no fraud? So like if I take a car from the local dealer in broad daylight and no one notices for a few days, there's no theft either right?

      "The victim was stupid" has never been a working defense. If it you think it should be, take a few minutes and ponder the implication to the legal system.

    54. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by msauve · · Score: 1

      Try posting when you're not high, and can write understandable English.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    55. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by elvesrus · · Score: 1

      Slightly more relevant as it takes mithril coins.

      https://lotro-wiki.com/index.p...

    56. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the glider case says that bots are illegal, due to copyright since it has to technically copy the code to run in memory, when you don't have a license to run it. And there are similar issues with selling your characters.

      Here's what I'm wondering, though: if this is considered fraud, and EA can pursue it, then EA is stating their in-game currency is worth real money. If it's worth real money, they can't simply forbid it from being sold. If they claim it's theirs (which virtually every game maker does) and has zero value (which virtually every game maker does), having it worth a real value could force it to be declared legal to sell characters and in-game currency for real-world money. Doctrine of first sale and so on.

    57. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      10000000000000000000 in FIFA money is worth what to you?

      I have no idea, but I bet it's worth something to somebody. So I suppose whatever they'd pay is what it would be worth.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    58. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One big difference is that the length of the games being played and the number of clients (all purchased $60 copies) places a limit on the number of these coins that can be earned in a set period of time. Lying about the games can essentially rob EA of the market they designed in the game. EA isn't a sympathetic character, but it's pretty blatant that these people were defrauding EA. This would be a silly case if EA was suing over some kid essentially stealing one player pack, but apparently these people made $15 million off of it, and a non-negligible portion of that money would have otherwise gone to EA.

    59. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero, but in all online games your character and ALL of their possessions, every single one, remain property of the company. You cannot sell what you do not own. Even if he was selling legitimately earned currency he would still be violating the law.

    60. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is illegal. Blizzard only grants you access to the character and can revoke that whenever they please. They are the ones that own the character, its progress, and possessions. They can change, delete, move, sell, or otherwise alter it however they please. As the ones who own the character, they are the only ones who are allowed to change it for your benefit or detriment in exchange for money. If you sell the character, you are selling the property of someone else, or selling access to an unauthorized person.

      Digital goods are licensed rather than sold due to being infinitely reproducable and easily accessible, and you are given no right to sell that license.

    61. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by fedos · · Score: 1

      The law doesn't require EA to have lost money on the transaction for it to be considered fraud, only that the perpetrators profited through deception. But if you're only going to be satisfied if a monetary loss was involved, remember that the people they sold the ill-gotten coins to are out the money (since EA would have deleted the coins and anything they were used to purchase), and that EA would have had to sink man-hours into the forensics to track what happened who ended up with the coins. This was not a victimless crime.

    62. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      This argument is nuts. If I write a chess app that allows illegal moves, is it really a game of chess just because I claim it was intended to be played that way?

      A program is defined by what it does. If the designers did not want to have the game accept the outcomes of matches that did not occur, then they should have stated that in the "API rules"... if they exist. But if the designers had even considered this, then why didn't they write code to prevent it from occurring? It seems obvious that they never really considered this usage and therefore had no intent for it to be used one way or the other.

      Hate the game not the player.

    63. Re:$15-$18 million of real money or FIFA money? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Again, I don't see the difference. Rob a place for $5 or for $500 it is still robbery. Sentences may be different depending on the severity of the act, but the act itself is unchanged.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  4. Re:Correction for summary by Rei · · Score: 1, Troll

    I'm sorry, I think you're confusing football - you know, the game where move a ball around with your feet - with an American curiosity, "Handegg".

    While we're on the subject, "Handball" is not a game played by yuppies involving hitting a ball against a wall; it's a fast-paced aggressive team sport, something like a cross between basketball and football (not handegg).

    --
    It's times like this I wish I had a friend named 'The Professor'.
  5. EA are criminals so what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They abuse their employees, Origin has been proven multiple times to be malware that scans instant messaging logs of its users, and ever since their inception so many long years ago they have pursued anti-consumer ethics and policies. They have destroyed entire companies and livelihoods.

    But that doesn't matter because when it comes down to it I guess. Anyway they've done this shit before with Dead Space 3 and they'll keep doing it. The F2P bullshit is South Korea's fault, a poisoning of the well.

    1. Re:EA are criminals so what by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you commit a crime against criminals you're still a criminal. But that's beside the point. It's a tech story. The way they pulled of the fraud is of interest to certain people for various reasons.

  6. Back in Lienage 2 days by future+assassin · · Score: 0

    lots of people lost their in game currency and items from exploits/hackers yet most of the time the company did nothing and if you as a plebeian tried to get the authorities to investigate you'd be told to beat it but BUT oh a corporation loses some in game currency and the FBI is on it.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:Back in Lienage 2 days by Moof123 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, this.

      It never seems to rise to fraud when unplayable buggy games are shipped, or are missing advertised features. Nobody in power bats an eye when multiplayer games have their servers shut off and thus ruin the value of something I paid for, or when the first sale doctrine is violated and I can't sell my property due to DRM.

      So yeah, these guys behaved badly, but it sort of like finding out a mobster's house got robbed. I have no sympathy to spare, and kind of hope the thieves get off.

  7. IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash now by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash now?

    You won in game cash and you need to pay us for it.

  8. Re:Correction for summary by freeze128 · · Score: 0

    It's not football, it's futbol!

  9. Re:Correction for summary by bobbied · · Score: 1, Troll

    This particular game is not a football game, it's a soccer game.

    Outside of America the term "Football" means a game played with a round ball and your feet that Americans prefer to call soccer. Why Americans call their rugby like game played with a rugby ball that rarely involves playing with the feet "football" is a mystery, but they do, much to the confusion of Americans who overhear foreigners discussing "Football" and don't recognize the team names.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  10. Re: IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the odds of them reporting this income?

    But no, this wasn't in game cash. This was taken out of game, making it converted.

    It'll be seized, and if the FBI does its job, the transactions refunded to the victims.

    Ok, ok, so they'll keep the proceeds fof themselves, unless the customers complain.

    Oh well.

  11. Stealing by freeze128 · · Score: 2

    I like they way that you put "stealing" in quotes. It's not really stealing because EA did not lose any money. The hackers found a way to make the FIFA game CREATE money for them, and then they sold that in-game money for real money. The only people who are out "Real" money are the clients who bought the in-game currency, but they have something to show for it.

    If anything, the people who bought the in-game currency from the hackers should sue EA for making a crappy program that someone could abuse.

    1. Re:Stealing by wardrich86 · · Score: 2

      The real question is if the hackers declared the income. If they did, I really don't see how they managed to get in trouble for selling game data for cash... seems fucky. If it were earned the way EA expected the credits to be earned and then sold, would they still care?

    2. Re:Stealing by Sowelu · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you sell limited-edition prints of a painting, and people buy it because having one out of only a hundred has value to them, then someone making counterfeits is decreasing the value even if they don't directly take from the original creator.

      If these game points are considered to have value because they take time, effort or skill to obtain, and then someone finds a way to manufacture more of those points by deception, then clearly it's diminishing the value of the legitimate ones.

    3. Re:Stealing by subanark · · Score: 1

      Does EA sell this currency themselves? If so, then some people would buy cheaper illegal coins, rather than ones from official sources. If not, then anyone who legally sells them is losing money.

    4. Re:Stealing by rhazz · · Score: 1

      I believe that the coins can be purchased from EA directly (in addition to being slowly earned via gameplay). The "black market" is black because it's against the TOS for the game, and essentially means that EA loses money when players get their coins from that market rather than from EA (there are apparently dozens of sites out there). If the black market undercuts EA too much then EA loses more sales, and flooding the black market with millions of ill-gotten coins likely leads to undercutting.

      This is just based on limited research... maybe an actual player could clarify. So is EA losing money? I would guess that the $17M could represent lost coin sales, since somebody paid those guys for those coins that they may otherwise have bought from EA. At best it is unauthorized use of their servers or possibly a breach of TOS, which I guess in the US is equivalent to whatever crime the writer of the TOS wants.

      From a player point of view, having automated generation of in-game currency leads to market inflation and essentially leads to items being priced out of your average player's range. However since EA is selling the currency themselves and making the goods scarce (it seems that certain player purchases used to be auctioned) I don't feel bad that someone is pissing in their pond.

    5. Re:Stealing by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      If you sell limited-edition prints of a painting, and people buy it because having one out of only a hundred has value to them, then someone making counterfeits is decreasing the value even if they don't directly take from the original creator.

      Yeah, that's competition for you. One has a right to the property itself, not the market value of the property. So long as this hypothetical competitor doesn't claim that the copies are either originals or authorized reproductions, no fraud has been committed. "Decreasing the value" is not a crime by itself.

      Calling this "wire fraud" is ridiculous. EA might have a case for regular fraud, in the sense that they were tricked into issuing the tokens (though that is partly their fault for blindly trusting whatever the client software tells them). It's hard to imagine any damages being associated with that "fraud" unless EA is in the business of selling these tokens for real-world money, which would make them rather hypocritical since that behavior is prohibited to others in their ToS. The buyers have a better claim, since they are out real money for the unearned and likely-to-be-cancelled tokens, but since they were buying from "black market dealers" in the first place they don't have much room to complain.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    6. Re: Stealing by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

      Yes. All of the EA Sports games with Ultimate Team modes offer the ability to purchase "coins" that can be used to buy in game "cards." The in game cards are also available for purchase directly with real money.

    7. Re:Stealing by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Then in that case, you still make my point for me, because the only people who have anything to gripe about are the people who bought the in-game currency from the hackers. They paid more for the in-game currency than it was worth (because it was de-valued, like you said). However, free market rules indicate that the hackers can charge what the market will bear. So, I don't know, sue Ticketmaster instead.

    8. Re:Stealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if they only farmed fifa coins? (no selling, no real money involved) Would it still be fraud? Or simply a gamer using a bot?

      What if they farmed fifa coins and then gave them away? (no selling, no real money involved) Would it still be fraud? Or simply a gamer using a bot that happens to give away his in-game fictitious earnings?

      What if they farmed fifa coins and then exchanged them for bitcoin? (no selling, may be bartering but no real money involved) Would it still be fraud?

      When is fraud fraud then.

  12. Is the a reward? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    I could turn n a few people for on-line in-game murder.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  13. 1996 vs 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 1990s on a MUD, I would sometimes pick other player's pockets to get coins. On a few occasions I even virtually killed someone, and though I don't remember very well, I probably took the in-game currency from their corpses, too. In 2016 this would get me real-life fraud charges?!

    1. Re:1996 vs 2016 by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      No. Picking pockets and killing people was an agreed and accepted part of the game. In this case, those coins had no real world value either.

  14. This is absurd! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    If there is no currency exchange and it cannot be used to buy goods, it's property. The wire fraud charge is just bonkers. The reason the FBI would jumped to such a conclusion is that what was being done wasn't actually illegal. They were authorized to use the servers and nothing of value was taken because it was created by the hackers.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:This is absurd! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you think up a new crime does not mean it is not covered by old law.
      Most computer crime involves wire fraud.
      They can try to convince a Jury its not.

    2. Re:This is absurd! by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      Actually it wasn't created by the hackers. It was created by the servers, and access was granted by the servers to the hackers through fraudulent identification.

  15. Re:IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash now?

    You won in game cash and you need to pay us for it.

    Aren't things like "XP" (experience points) earned in-game and used to purchase items/abilities/etc the same thing?

    If criminal currency laws apply to in-game currencies, will people who play computer games that use XP or similar in-game transactional "currencies" need to fill out an IRS Form 1099 after every game session? What about the value of "property" bought within the game, is it taxable? Should State sales tax be levied against in-game currencies?

    I'd hate to receive a tax bill for the ~15 million C-Bills I've got sitting in my Mech Warrior Online game account.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  16. Re:Correction for summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Australia it can mean Rugby League, Rugby Union or Aussie No-rules depending on where you are.

  17. Re:Correction for summary by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    If that is true why on earth is the governing body for rugby in England named the Rugby Football Union?

    It's almost like "football" is a term that covers a wide variety of sports and different locales use just plain old "football" to refer to whichever happens to be more popular there.

  18. Hold The presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is actually people who actually play EA games these days?

    They haven't made a relevant sports game since Mutant League Football.

  19. Interesting paradigm by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

    This is an interesting situation, from my limited knowledge of it. It's the first time I'm aware of that something with no monetary value was taken from the issuer with no actual deprivation of services (i.e. it's not a limited resource; nobody was deprived of these coins), yet the criminals were able to literally receive millions of dollars selling them. It's as if someone was selling pirated Mp3s, except in this case, the coins aren't purchased in the first place; they're won through playing a game (which doesn't have a cost per match, meaning they're actually free after you purchase the game & xbox live membership or whatever platform this is.)
    So, basically, we have a victimless* crime that made real money. Seems quite unusual.

    *The victims here are the other players who didn't cheat, and now have an unfair disadvantage.

    1. Re:Interesting paradigm by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      In terms of "who's the victim and who benefits", this seems identical to art forgery. Nothing was taken, but value was removed from existing goods. If there is utility in scarcity, then removing scarcity destroys that utility.

    2. Re:Interesting paradigm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The victims here are the other players who didn't cheat, and now have an unfair disadvantage."

      It's probably a pay to win game anyway. They are at disadvantage by default if they do not open their wallets.
      They are not victims because they could buy the same coins from EA directly.

  20. Sad Reality by U8MyData · · Score: 1

    Something that I have always had a beef with is software companies. Does Ford, Toyota, or any other hard goods manufactures state or enforce what I would call "left turn Sundays?" Where, as a part of a Ford EULA for example, states it is the company's right and requirement that you as an owner (not really) are required to make left turns only on Sunday. If you fail to do this, then we have a right to take you to court and prosecute. Let's not even talk about arbitration. If EA left a wide open window in its API or SDK, it's their fault. Period. Anyone want to talk about IoT and DDoS in this regard? Same thing...

    1. Re:Sad Reality by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Ford, Toyota, or any others hide under there network of dealers both ways when it benefits them.

    2. Re:Sad Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Um, car manufacturers do this all the time. You buy a warranty, either separately or with the car. The warranty states that you must have service performed at X, Y or Z service locations. If you have the service performed elsewhere and something happens to the car, the warranty is void. If you force them to provide the service you paid for they will take you to court.
      How is this any different?

    3. Re:Sad Reality by Sowelu · · Score: 1

      If you social-engineer your way into a bank vault to steal stuff, then of course the bank employees are idiots and massively liable, but it's still your fault too.

    4. Re:Sad Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Key word being steal.
      If I walk into a bank and ask "Hey, can you print out some new $100 bills for me?" and they do it, I'd say that's their own damn fault.

  21. Can I sue the owner of a pinball game for make the by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Can I sue the owner of a pinball game for make the outlines to wide? or the having the tilt set to high?

  22. in some games hacking is part of the game and by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    in some games hacking is part of the game and other ways for some setting as long as it's just in game it should be ok. But for people to be facing real court / jail / prison for it?

  23. Re:Correction for summary by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Why Americans call their rugby like game played with a rugby ball that rarely involves playing with the feet "football" is a mystery, but they do, much to the confusion of Americans who overhear foreigners discussing "Football" and don't recognize the team names.

    Because it initially developed from a game that was similar to soccer in that you could not carry the ball but had to either kick or bat the ball to progress down the field. It was only a few decades later that the sport started to include more rugby-like rules, and even more decades before the gained the start/stop style of play and the forward pass was included.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  24. Re:Correction for summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI it isn't just Americans, ask an Australian about football and he will probably ask you if you mean Aussie Rules or Rugby.

    The Soccoroos is the name of the Austrailan National futbol/soccer team.

  25. Re:Correction for summary by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    It's called football to distinguish it from horseball.

  26. Re:IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 2

    IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash now?

    Hardly. But if you sell your in-game cash for $15 million in real money, the IRS will want their cut of the profit.

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  27. Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goldman Sachs do this all the time. Too big to fail, too big to jail.
    --
    AmiMoJo

  28. Just like the real FIFA by lxs · · Score: 1

    Lets see if the hackers get harsher punishments than Sepp Blatter and Michel Platini.

  29. Wire fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So "wire fraud" means tricking EA into generating a few fake game coins? Since when is this a real crime, and why is the FBI getting involved - have they solved all the real-world crimes already?

  30. Re:IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    This is legally wrong. According to the IRS, if you, for example, receive something as a gift, you're supposed to declare that as "income", and pay taxes on it based on its fair market value, even if you don't actually sell it.

    I don't see how it's any different here.

    So yes, people who win a bunch of in-game cash need to report this to the IRS and pay taxes on it.

    Otherwise, these people should be cleared of the "fraud" charges.

    You can't have it both ways.

  31. Re:Can I sue the owner of a pinball game for make by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    to wide what??

  32. Re:Correction for summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Americans call their rugby like game played with a rugby ball that rarely involves playing with the feet "football" is a mystery, but they do, much to the confusion of Americans who overhear foreigners discussing "Football" and don't recognize the team names.

    No it is not a mystery and those names were used in Europe too at one point.

  33. But if it's a wireless cell phone game by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    How can it be "wire" fraud.

    Wireless.

    Means no wires.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  34. Re: Correction for summary by jmac_the_man · · Score: 2
    The full formal name of the game depicted in the FIFA games is "Association Football." This name is often shortened (depending on locale) to either "football" or "soccer." The name of the game comes from the fact that it's played "on foot" unlike polo, which is played "on horseback." (The implication was that soccer is a game for poor people, too poor to own their own horse.)

    The NFL sanctions games in a sport called "Gridiron Football," which is also commonly shortened to football. The name comes from the fact that the oblong ball was historically 12 inches (one foot) long, when measured tip to tip. (The size of the ball was changed to the modern 11.5 inches in the 1930s to make the forward pass easier.)

  35. so a fake field goal, fake punt = fraud by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    so what about in game stuff like a fake field goal, fake punt, etc = fraud?

    1. Re:so a fake field goal, fake punt = fraud by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Well, because they are in-game, there is no "real" field goal or "real" punt... they are all "fake", when you get right down to it. What makes something fraud is when there is deliberate deception involved.

    2. Re:so a fake field goal, fake punt = fraud by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I believe GP is talking about real world football. Faking a punt involves deliberate deception, but is part of the game.

      Eve online players would have a hell of time convincing a court that in game ponzi schemes/protection rackets/piracy were illegal. All part of the game by design.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:so a fake field goal, fake punt = fraud by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Eve online players would have a hell of time convincing a court that in game ponzi schemes/protection rackets/piracy were illegal. All part of the game by design.

      But what about the state prosecutor? Or say some kid loses in game to a in game scam and his not that tech dad who is a judge / cop / prosecutor things that is a fraud and under bad laws like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
      Maybe able to make it stick or at the very least have it come to court in some way. Even more so with games like EVE Online where you can make in game cash to a level where you can play for free.

  36. Such realistic content by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    This makes the game even more realistic.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  37. You must not live in the US by HBI · · Score: 1
    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  38. Re:IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    This is legally wrong. According to the IRS, if you, for example, receive something as a gift, you're supposed to declare that as "income", and pay taxes on it based on its fair market value, even if you don't actually sell it.

    You do not have to declare a gift as income unless it's over the reporting amount of $16,000 (for 2016).

  39. Re:IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1
  40. Re:Can I sue the owner of a pinball game for make by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the tilt set too high?

    If you want: But how do you prove the maker owed you a lower tilt? Or, that you didn't know the tilt being 'offered' was too high, when you purchased access to the machine? Or, that you suffered distress and material damage from the level of tilt supplied?

  41. I'll be on that jury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not guilty.

  42. Re:Correction for summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Americans call their rugby like game played with a rugby ball that rarely involves playing with the feet "football" is a mystery...

    I don't know. Maybe it's something to do with the game being played on foot as opposed to on horseback?

  43. So wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some guys are being locked up because they played a fake sports game and made fake money in the fake game world and sold the fake stuff for real stuff? Fuck my world. The zombie apocalypse is real. Trump is president. The world is over.

  44. Re:IRS to go after any one that wins in game cash by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    $15 milion is a lot more than $14,000. We're talking about someone who "cheated" an online game for in-game funny money and sold it for $15M here, so that certainly qualifies for the gift threshold. It would be the same for anyone else who didn't cheat in the game and made a bunch of in-game funny money, and didn't sell it. So my point is: does the IRS actually go after people who are really serious gamers and amass lots of in-game "money" (without selling it for real money) and demand tax payments? If not, then this is not real money, and these hackers didn't really commit "fraud".

    Not only that, but (you might be able to answer this better than me) doesn't the IRS require you to pay taxes on any "income" you earn? The gift exclusion is for gifts only, not for payment maid in lieu of US Dollars. If you do some yard work or handyman work for someone (not a relative/friend), and he pays you in produce from his garden or eggs from his chicken coop, you're supposed to assess the fair market value of those goods, and declare them as income and pay taxes on them, both state and federal. Of course, no one does, but that's the law. There's no minimum value exclusion here I know of. It's no different with in-game "money". So logically, the IRS should be demanding that all these MMORPG companies provide detailed information to them about all their players and how much in-game money they have, so the IRS can demand payment.

  45. Re: Correction for summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name of the game used to be 'Association Football'. It isn't anymore, it's just 'football'. The alleged origin of the term 'soccer' is that both football and rugby were played at some public schools. The rugby players referred to their game as 'rugger', the football players abbreviated the name of their game to 'soc' (short for association). A sporty type who played both games was asked at the beginning of the season if he was going to play rugger this season, and he replied that no, he was going to play 'soc-er', the rest of the lads picked up the term and it spread from there. Or so the story goes. In any case, soccer as a term for football is very old.

  46. "Wire Fraud" is narrower than other fraud crimes. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    You obtained a thing through deception, and everyone in the transaction agrees that the thing has value. How isn't that fraud?

    It's not a matter of "fraud". It's a matter of "Wire Fraud" under U.S. law.

    Wire fraud is narrower than, say, mail fraud (which can apply to services). To be "Wire Fraud" there has to be a transfer of "money" or "property", not just "something of value".

    If the thing transferred is something of which there is a fixed and limited amount, it might arguably qualify. But if it's just a count that the service can bump up and down arbitrarily, or an instance of a token of a class where the service can create or destroy as many as they like, it isn't "money"-like or "property"-like, no matter how much someone is willing to pay for it. It might be "service"-like. But that isn't an element of wire fraud.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  47. The right questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's suppose they only farmed the coins and didn't sell them.
    Would it still be fraud? No real money involved. Or a simple violation of TOS?

    Let's suppose this is not a computer game, its monopoly, with real game components.
    Would it be fraud if they stole monopoly money while other players are not watching?

    Let's suppose you are playing monopoly and you pay real money to your brother to steal monopoly money from the in-game bank.
    Would it be possible to be accused of fraud in that case?

    Let's suppose it the other way around, they didn't farm the coins but earned them right and then sold them to earn millons in cash but didn't mention it to the IRS.
    Would it still be fraud? Or tax evasion?

    Let's suppose they break the game rules / tos and farm them, and then exchange the game coins for bitcoins.
    Would it still be fraud? Like stealing monopoly money for bitcoins would be?

    So what is "fraud"... how they obtained them? (making stealing money in monopoly also "real" fraud) ... or is the fact that obtaining them under violation of game rules (like stealing monopoly money is) and then selling them what makes it fraud?

    So, is it fraud? tax evasion? tos violation?

  48. Re:"Wire Fraud" is narrower than other fraud crime by Sowelu · · Score: 1

    Oh, good point. That does seem a little weird, then.

  49. Re:"Wire Fraud" is narrower than other fraud crime by fedos · · Score: 1

    wire fraud is identical to mail fraud statute except that it speaks of communications transmitted by wire

    If the thing transferred is something of which there is a fixed and limited amount, it might arguably qualify.

    Even if your definition of wire fraud only involving money and property were true, this statement wouldn't follow since money doesn't have a fixed and limited amount.

    Conclusion: You have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

  50. Re:"Wire Fraud" is narrower than other fraud crime by fedos · · Score: 1