Slashdot Mirror


US Dementia Rates Drop 24%, New Study Finds (cnn.com)

A new study involving more than 21,000 people across the country finds that dementia rates in people over age 65 fell from 11.6 percent in 2000 to 8.8 percent in 2012 -- a decline of 24 percent. CNN reports: The decline in dementia rates translates to about one million fewer Americans suffering from the condition, said John Haaga, director of behavioral and social research at the National Institute on Aging, part of the National Institutes of Health, which funded the new study. Dementia is a general term for a loss of memory or other mental abilities that's severe enough to interfere with daily life. Alzheimer's disease, which is believed to be caused by a buildup of plaques and tangles in the brain, is the most common type of dementia. Vascular dementia is the second most common type of dementia and occurs after a stroke. The study, which began in 1992, focuses on people over age 50, collecting data every two years. Researchers conduct detailed interviews with participants about their health, income, cognitive ability and life circumstances. The interviews also include physical tests, body measurements and blood and saliva samples. Although researchers can't definitively explain why dementia rates are decreasing, Langa said doctors may be doing a better job controlling high blood pressure and diabetes, which can both boost the risk of age-related memory problems. High blood pressure and diabetes both increase the risk of strokes, which kill brain cells, increasing the risk of vascular dementia. Authors of the study found that senior citizens today are better educated than even half a generation ago. The population studied in 2012 stayed in school 13 years, while the seniors studied in 2000 had about 12 years of education, according to the study. People who are better educated may have more intellectually stimulating jobs and hobbies that help exercise their brains, Langa said. The study has been published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine.

105 comments

  1. Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This makes no sense. If it were true how did Trump get elected?

    1. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      My thoughts exactly. I think they've simply changed the level at which they're declaring someone demented.

    2. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This makes no sense. If it were true how did Trump get elected?

      The article is specific about dementia. Not stupidity, which is now rampant.

    3. Re:Impossible by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      This makes no sense. If it were true how did Trump get elected?

      Actually it makes total sense: the reason why there's an apparent drop in cases of dementia in the US is because the rest of the population is getting it. When Americans select a dangerous populist as POTUS, clearly they've started to forget the past and behave erratically. If that's not dementia, I don't know what is.

      In other words, when the entire country is starting to go gaga, the real gagas go under the radar. Hence the drop.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    4. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People at Trump and Clinton's age already have signs (in the Brain) of Dementia even if the condition doesn't present itself. That's an actual fact, not some made-up nonsense.

    5. Re:Impossible by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      Keep it. You're gonna need it when you finally figure out what you've done.

      --
      No sig today...
    6. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They both were bad for the public and as much as we have a strong media bias and a bunch of know-nothings shouting down Trump the fact is the man is an amateur that will likely try to swindle the public but Hillary was plainly dangerous and had a plan that would have meant many lives be sacrificed for the powers behind the throne.

    7. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent post is no flame-bait at all but rather a spot-on analysis...

    8. Re:Impossible by rholtzjr · · Score: 2

      Actually it makes total sense: the reason why there's an apparent drop in cases of dementia in the US is because the rest of the population is getting it. When Americans select a dangerous populist as POTUS, clearly they've started to forget the past and behave erratically. If that's not dementia, I don't know what is.

      As opposed to selecting a documented career politician who shows the characteristics of being a power-hungry, corrupt, pathological liar who cares nothing about the lives she is effecting?

      Hmmm, now I will agree about the position of "rest of the population getting it" in the context of they have finally woken up (thus the decrease in cases) and started to see the truth themselves instead of being told what the truth is.

    9. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, please, tell us white men how we're sooo self destructive. Keep insulting us and maybe next time we'll think about voting for team #KillAllMen.

      Protip: if you're having trouble getting people to support you, perhaps it's time to consider that maybe punching up is not the best approach, and not punching at all might work better.

    10. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they've merely lowered the bar.

    11. Re:Impossible by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      power-hungry, corrupt, pathological liar who cares nothing about the lives she is effecting?

      Why are you talking about Trump again?

    12. Re:Impossible by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      I am not the one who brought this up. I am just reflecting an opposing view on the previous comment.

    13. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      this study period ended 2012. like to blame trump on someone, but this isn't it (that is a study of the effects of mass and social media and reality television on poorly educated, easily influenced morons breathing too much manure fumes in rural red states; among other things)

      it's more like doctors are facing increasing pressure from their facilities' business offices to not officially diagnose conditions that can be expensive to treat, are incurable and life-long, that mostly affects older lower-profit medicare patients, and are not directly life-threatening

    14. Re:Impossible by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      It's not impossible. The drop in dementia could be related to the year over year drop in PC sales. As PC sales drop, so do the number of people afflicted with Microsoft Windows. And thus dementia rates decline. For several years now, Chromebooks have been the most popular laptops on Amazon. So there is hope.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    15. Re:Impossible by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      And I am saying your "opposing view" is misguided at best and morally bankrupt at worst.

    16. Re:Impossible by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

      You have just describe Hillary, congratulations!

    17. Re:Impossible by syntotic · · Score: 1

      Such is the size of the genocide to achieve such advance in public mental health. I omit the argumentation but someone had to stop it! And it would not be the Administration that did not even notice it.

  2. Lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if it is part of the theorized behavioral wave resultant from banning Tetraethyllead.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    The ban is correlated with the lead free generation of young adults having a greatly reduced threshold for criminal violence and murder.

    1. Re:Lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This was also the first thing that came to my mind when reading this. It is amazing how regulatory changes can affect the well being of millions of people. Not to get too political, but this is one of the aspects of Trump's "Remove two regulations for every one added" that scares me a bit. Let's hope regulation on emissions is not one of the regulations that get cut. (although the plan to expand the fossil fuel energy sector suggests otherwise)

      As an interesting tidbit that slashdot readers may find interesting; exposure to diesel fumes cause epigenetic changes:
      http://www.whatisepigenetics.com/epigenetic-changes-result-from-breathing-in-diesel-exhaust/

      I predict that in the next ten years the "oxygen depletion crisis" will be a thing. (fwiw, human respiration contributes 7% towards O2 use and CO2 emission. Most of the rest is fossil fuel use.)

    2. Re:Lead? by TheLink · · Score: 2

      The release of Doom and similar video games is also correlated to the falling crime rates. Perhaps the more hours young adults spend on such games the fewer hours they spend bashing or killing each other? ;)

      --
    3. Re:Lead? by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      I doubt it. Dementia is a disease of the elderly. Even my parents in their mid 60s spend half their lives around leaded gas. I am not sure how old you have to be before they stop calling it early onset but the folks with sever issues that I have mostly encountered tend to be in their late 70s and 80s. So they will have spend the majority of their lives around leaded gas.

      So I would expect its to early to make attribution. That does not rule out all kinds of other environmental factors though.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:Lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stroke treatment has massively improved, too.

    5. Re:Lead? by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Or more people switched from Tylenol/Paracetamol to Advil/Ibuprofen.

    6. Re:Lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The release of Doom and similar video games is also correlated to the falling crime rates. Perhaps the more hours young adults spend on such games the fewer hours they spend bashing or killing each other? ;)

      How many inner city gangbangers even had computers, much less those that could actually play DOOM back in the day?

    7. Re:Lead? by Chaset · · Score: 1

      Coincidentally, I was just mulling over the lead thing this morning before I saw this. My pet theory/wishful thinking is that just as we saw reduction in petty crime rate as the "leaded generation" moved out from that age group (teens-30), we will see reduction in "big" crime as the leaded generation moves out of positions of power and influence. Most politicians and business leaders of influence are 50-70 range. It's possible that even at levels that don't cause a measurable decrease in IQ, lead may affect decision making and long term planning in ways that, on the average across the population, are detrimental to society. (In D&D terms, if everyone took a -1 to WIS penalty across the population, individual effects might be small, but the population effects would be large.)

      I also speculate (or it's my wishful thinking that) the general "I got mine FU" attitude and anti-science denialism also stems from this.

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    8. Re:Lead? by Udom · · Score: 1

      "believed to be caused by a buildup of plaques and tangles in the brain", but on autopsy the brains of lots of people who had dementia show no such plaque, while lots who had no sign of dementia did have plaque. The focus on a physical cause suits the disease biases of doctors and the financial interests of big drug companies. But there are other models. Seniors are excluded from their families and stripped of any productive activity. They then lose track because keeping track no longer matters.

  3. Mod parent GAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be taboo to be gay. Now it's a basic requirement of every min and womyn. Children too, can't forget those pesky children and that mangy mutt. Ruby ruby rooooooo...!!!

    -timothy

  4. Re:Lead? ~56% reduction in crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From WIkipedia
    Reduction in the average blood lead level is believed to have been a major cause for falling violent crime rates in the United States[52] and South Africa.[53] Researchers including Amherst College economist Jessica Wolpaw Reyes, Department of Housing and Urban Development consultant Rick Nevin, and Howard Mielke of Tulane University, say that declining exposure to lead is responsible for up to a 56% decline in crime from 1992 to 2002.[54]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  5. Re:What about younger women? In US 25% are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems pretty much half of America is mentally il, lost touch with reality a long time ago, see Idiocracy for the lnevitable end of the US.

  6. In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news, yearly oral consumption of non-toxic glue products by first graders has apparently decreased by 24% over the same period.

    More research is required to form a hypothesis. Please send more glue sticks to Anonymous Coward c/o Cowboy Neal at the registered address for slashdot.org.

  7. Falling smoking rates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As the main modifiable risk factor, it's almost certain that cigarette smoking factors in there.

  8. Just a relabeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    These days it's called Trumpism

    1. Re: Just a relabeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol cracker. Been rioting since day one and it's a blast. Jamal's gonna bring guns tomorrow.

    2. Re:Just a relabeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait whose butt'll be hurting once the white thrash which helped put Trump where he is realizes that Trump is just about himself and his cronies. With far restraint than elitist, corrupt Clinton.

      That's gonna be ugly.

      Butthurt? Me? No. Just sad. Watching the show from a (precariously, yes) safe distance and really sad about what such a great country as yours has come to.

  9. Tangles? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Tangles in the brain? They make it sound like the brain is just made up of several million coat hangers!

    1. Re:Tangles? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      No, it's a series of tubes.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re: Tangles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given some people I've argued with argue against their own arguments after the ol' switcheroo, you'd think it was, at most, several thousand coat-hangers.
      Not even those Good plastic or wooden ones either, the really cheap plastic ones that break before you even pick them up in the store.

    3. Re:Tangles? by xtsigs · · Score: 1

      They make it sound like the brain is just made up of several million coat hangers!

      The real problem is that when you brain tries to throw them out, they come back as safety pins (find and read Hugo Awarded short story Or All the Sea with Oysters by Avram Davidson).

    4. Re:Tangles? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Tangles in the brain? They make it sound like the brain is just made up of several million coat hangers!

      Nope, it's made up of long strings of used Christmas lights.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  10. Poor Kanye West by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

    He's so out of touch with trends, he even loses his mind when it's going out of style.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  11. Crazy Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Trump needs to release his medical reports. He is over 70 years old. He probably has Alzheimer's and a shitload of dementia.

    1. Re:Crazy Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a race going on between H. Clinton and the Clinton Foundation to see which of the two is going to fall off the twig first.

    2. Re:Crazy Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Becoming President instantly adds 10 years to your age. Trump dyes his hair orange to hide his gray.

    3. Re:Crazy Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're talking about his supporters.

    4. Re:Crazy Trump by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      From what I heard, both Clinton and Trump are in good health. I was more interested in Trump's tax returns.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:Crazy Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why Trump flipflops back and forth. He can't remember what he said before. Poor memory.

  12. When? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's before or after the PUSA election?

  13. It's snowing early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Therefore Global Warming is a lie and a scam.

  14. Simply not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Alzheimer's disease, which is believed to be caused by a buildup of plaques and tangles in the brain, is the most common type of dementia.

    Is the most common type of NON VASCULAR dementia. Hypertension (high blood pressure) is by far the most common cause of dementia.

  15. the cause of this sudden decline by Mysund · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First thing that jump into my mind: Can this be caused by the removal of lead from petrol/gasoline and other consumer products?

    1. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      Funny - first thing that jumps to MY mind is "bogus study/experimental error/statistical outlier". Critical thinking ftw.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First thing that jumped into my head was 11.6 - 8.8 = 2.8, not 24. After that I stopped reading and went to the comments so I could make this one.

      Sounds like some poor news writer trying desperately to make an "astonishing headline".

    3. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and 2.8 is 24% of 11.6 - that seemed pretty obvious to everyone else here.

    4. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The first thing that jumps to my mind is this:

      figures released Tuesday by the Alzheimer's Association show that deaths from the disease increased by 68 percent between 2000 and 2010.

      "It's an epidemic, it's on the rise, and currently [there is] no way to delay it, prevent it or cure it," says Maria Carrillo, a neuroscientist with the Alzheimer's Association. More than 5 million people in the U.S. have the disease, she says, and that number could reach nearly 14 million by 2050. -- NPR 2013

      So the studies cover comparable time spans and come to widely diverging results -- unless there is some unknown factor that has made Alzheimer's less detectable and more lethal. Before that is explained I would not draw any conclusions.

    5. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the invention of faster, insurance covered glucometers, which was an *incredible* help for diabetics?

    6. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop bringing liberal-biased arithmetic into this.

    7. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alzheimer's is a subset of dementia. The study in the article also looked at a particular age cohort, whereas for the study from the Alzheimer's Association you are seeing figures from all ages for a subset of conditions referenced in the article.

      The two studies are not necessarily at odds with each other.

    8. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dying would tend to reduce the amount of people with the disease. So maybe people with the disease just die faster now.

    9. Re: the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dementia just claimed another victim.

    10. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outright rejection is not critical thinking. Critical thinking is more along the lines of saying to yourself "That's interesting. I'd like to see the data that they're using to form this conclusion."

    11. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File not found.

    12. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Funny - first thing that jumps to MY mind is "bogus study/experimental error/statistical outlier". Critical thinking ftw.

      What kind of person naturally assumes that the result of any scientific study is a fault of the study? Is god telling you the answer is wrong?

    13. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peer reviewers. Other scientists. A vital part of the scientific process is validation and verification.

      Don’t trust everything you read in the psychology literature. In fact, two thirds of it should probably be distrusted.

    14. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Critical thinking is also more how might I be wrong instead of why I am right.

    15. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you then looked at the study to assess the methodology, rigor, and possibility of systemic errors being present, that's not "critical thinking", that's just "lazy thinking".

    16. Re:the cause of this sudden decline by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I don't reject it. I just don't believe it until I see more data supporting it. Not believing is not the same as rejection. It's more like "keeping an open mind".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  16. Re:What about younger women? In US 25% are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about younger women? In US 25% are mentally ill. Anyone care to explain, what is going on over there.

    Those are only the ones that have been diagnosed.

  17. Side effect of student debt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not being able to retire at 65 because of a ever increasing student debt and only being able to work minimum wage jobs with a MA means they keep their minds busy by working instead of retiring keeps their minds sharp!

    1. Re:Side effect of student debt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not able to retire at 65 because of student debt, you get what you deserve.

  18. It's only 2.8 percentage points less... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    It went from one in about 9 to one in about 11 old people having dementia.

    Plus, they didn't bother with checking if there's any correlation between dementia and hand size.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  19. Reason: Hillary's supporters emigrated away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reason: Hillary's supporters emigrated away
    Good job. You are Making America Great Again too not even knowing about it.

  20. Statistical anomaly? by DThorne · · Score: 1

    Hard to say what this means, just a jump in deaths over a certain segment could be behind it, to say nothing of the fact that data capture must be a bitch. My wife's family is dealing with this right now and just getting all of them to acknowledge it's actually happening seems impossible, let alone the person with the affliction. Everyone's in denial, and we are told this happens in almost every case. Saliva samples aside, how do you get solid data?

    1. Re:Statistical anomaly? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, the results of the previous studies they're comparing this new one to had the same issues.

      So what's changed significantly in the past 16 years? Or, more likely, the couple of decades before the last 16 years?

      Other than no leaded gas, lower pollution levels overall, warmer climate, I mean....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Statistical anomaly? by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, getting really good public health data is hard, because it's expensive to do it in a way that gives you something you can go on, as opposed to something to purely speculate about. For all the limitations of something like the Framingham Heart Study or the Nurses Health Study, they're probably the gold standard when it comes to picking out statistical correlations that might be worth further investigation.

      I think, though, if there were an increase in the death rate of dementia patients that was big enough to explain at 24% decline in twelve years we'd probably know it. Either the sampling was wildly biased at one or both ends of that period, or there's something going on. Management of diabetes and high blood pressure is definitely a plausible cause for such a decline because they're both correlated to vascular dementia and stroke.

      On a personal note I know what you're going through. My Mom was really intelligent woman, but she had both hypertension and diabetes. The last ten years of her life she had progressive dementia, and it every time I saw her it was like a little bit more of her had slipped away. It encouraged me to get my act together -- without my mind I don't have much to live for, certainly not my looks. I dropped my blood pressure over several years 128/86 to 105/64 through diet and exercise.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  21. Re:Lead? ~56% reduction in crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to me to be a bit unlikely.

  22. It must be true... by XB-70 · · Score: 1

    I've got have a mind to agree.

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
    1. Re:It must be true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh! **HALF**

  23. No. of people with dementia dropped by 2.8% by tomxor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I always find it such an exaggerated way of presenting statistics to use a percentage of a percentage, the number gives no context (percentage of what), and the smaller the group of people the more the number is likely to fluctuate wildly.

    Whats wrong with a absolute percentage? "No. of people with dementia dropped by 2.8% between 2000 and 2012"... is it just not sensationalist enough? Otherwise when dementia only affects a handful of people it will be improving worsening by 9927648% every year! what a useful way of measuring it.

    1. Re:No. of people with dementia dropped by 2.8% by Derec01 · · Score: 1

      Clarity is what's important, and the notion of absolute percentage isn't necessarily universal.

      The statement "No. of people with dementia dropped by 2.8% between 2000 and 2012" is wrong given a standard interpretation of the base of a percentage. In an average population, where 4 people once would have gotten dementia, now only 3 will. That is absolutely a drop of ~25%. Your statement would imply that out of a 100 people who would gotten dementia, now only ~97 will, which understates the effect.

      Again though, this is best solved by a clear explanation in the first place. I didn't think the summary was unclear, but it appears to have caused some confusion.

    2. Re:No. of people with dementia dropped by 2.8% by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I always find it such an exaggerated way of presenting statistics to use a percentage of a percentage, the number gives no context (percentage of what), and the smaller the group of people the more the number is likely to fluctuate wildly.

      Of course there's context. The context is within the group of people directly affected. It also provides some very clear information about the outcomes of prevention programs which are completely lost when you specify only absolute numbers.

      Say we eliminated eliminated dementia tomorrow, what would be more useful to you? To know that dementia rates have dropped by 100% from last year to this year? Or that the dementia rate fell by 8.8% across the population from last year to this year?

      Don't fear fluctuating numbers, even that can give you some great information.

  24. Perhaps they changed the test to detect dementia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The title should be "Reported" US Dementia Rates Drop 24%
    I don't know if they changed the dementia diagnosis approach, probably they did.
    It is like evaluating poverty, if you increase the poverty line a thousand bucks, poverty decreases suddenly.

  25. Re:Lead? ~56% reduction in crime by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

    This seems to me to be a bit unlikely.

    Oh, well then. That changes everything.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  26. Statistical skepticism by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I always find it such an exaggerated way of presenting statistics to use a percentage of a percentage, the number gives no context (percentage of what), and the smaller the group of people the more the number is likely to fluctuate wildly.

    I'd go further. It needs to not only indicate WHAT it is a percentage of but also what the confidence interval is for the result and what the population size was and its composition and the calculation methodology. Statistics that do not include the error bars should be considered only with great skepticism. Statistics which do not disclose the calculation methodology doubly so.

    Whats wrong with a absolute percentage? "No. of people with dementia dropped by 2.8% between 2000 and 2012"

    What specifically do you mean by "absolute percentage"? When people talk about changes they generally talk about absolute value change or percentage change but absolute percentage change isn't really a thing. Percentages are by definition relative. You can have an absolute percentage error which is something used routinely.

  27. Fuck you by moosehooey · · Score: 1

    Why do you asshole trolls keep bringing up the election? Go die in a fucking fire.

  28. Statistics by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    It's probably because the baby boomers are just hitting 65+, and so the average person over 65 in 2012 is younger than the average person over 65 in 2000.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Statistics by FranklinWebber · · Score: 1

      Interesting observation. After skimming the JAMA article I am not able to tell whether that difference is significant, but here are two quotes you might find interesting:

      "The study cohorts had an average age of 75.0 years (95% CI, 74.8-75.2 years) in 2000 and 74.8 years (95% CI, 74.5-75.1 years) in 2012"

      "Compared with the 2000 cohort, the 2012 cohort had a significantly larger proportion of those who were 85 years or older..."

  29. Most people that were exposed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to see a study that compares rates of dementia in people that fought in WWI/WWII/Korea compared to people that didn't. My grandfather who fought in the Pacific during WWII and in Korea was exposed to "Agent Orange" and Lord knows what else. Combined with heavy drinking and tobacco use, I wouldn't be surprised if there is a link. Most WWII and Korean War veterans have passed away which could be the cause of this drop in numbers.

  30. social media / internet might be helping. by pezpunk · · Score: 1

    i wonder if social media and the ubiquity of the internet has anything to do with it. i suspect it's more healthy for the brain to be actively engaged with friends and family, even virtually, and reading about current events (even if it's hateful clickbait) than sitting around having very little mental or emotional engagement knitting doilies or whatever.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  31. How does the rate drop by a quarter? by pjv936 · · Score: 0

    It doesn't make sense unless a large percentage of dementia was caused by an infectious disease that has run its course. The disease does not have to happen 10 or 20 years ago. It could have happened 40 to 50 years ago and its effect are only noticed in seniors.

  32. I'm a US doc (MD) by RatPh!nk · · Score: 1

    but I am not a neurologist. I started medical training (med school in 2004) an dI'm in practice today. I have long been suspicious that most dementias that we are calling "Alzheimer's" dementia are really multi-infarct/vascular dementia from mini-stroke/strokes/atherosclerosis etc.... Remember the "gold standard" in a practical sense to diagnose Alzheimer's demential is post-mortem brain pathology examination.

    --
    Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
  33. What kind of person naturally assumes? by pem · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not a natural assumption. Maybe it's a considered position, reached after looking at evidence.

    1. Re:What kind of person naturally assumes? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The GP has made no mention of looking at evidence. He just said it's the first thing that jumped to his mind.

    2. Re:What kind of person naturally assumes? by pem · · Score: 1
      What kind of person naturally assumes that the first thought that comes to mind for somebody else couldn't possibly be supported by prior experience and reporting?

      Is god telling you that Dunbal's answer is wrong?

  34. It's a baseline artifact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When everybody's gone crazy, it skews the baseline to where those with dementia just seem normal.

  35. Of course general dementia has declined. by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Of course general dementia has declined.

    We've been concentrating it all in our politicians.

  36. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Muff diver? More like a zipper head.

  37. Re:Lead? ~56% reduction in crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm think that the reduction in lead, as well as the banning of several pesticides, and flame retardants, has had a hand in this reduction.
    I'm sure over time studies will end up proving that poison is bad for you, and that less poison leads to better health than more poison. :\

  38. right idea, wrong chemical by Narcocide · · Score: 2

    My guess is its more to do with reduced dietary sugar intake across the board. Studies showing statistical correlations between dementia and high-sugar diets have previously been reported on here on Slashdot.

  39. it's the weed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thc removes the plaque causing protean from the brain. more pot smoking, less dementia