Slashdot Mirror


FBI Hacked Over 8,000 Computers In 120 Countries Based on One Warrant (vice.com)

Joseph Cox, reporting for Motherboard: In January, Motherboard reported on the FBI's "unprecedented" hacking operation, in which the agency, using a single warrant, deployed malware to over one thousand alleged visitors of a dark web child pornography site. Now, it has emerged that the campaign was actually several orders of magnitude larger. In all, the FBI obtained over 8,000 IP addresses, and hacked computers in 120 different countries, according to a transcript from a recent evidentiary hearing in a related case. The figures illustrate the largest ever known law enforcement hacking campaign to date, and starkly demonstrate what the future of policing crime on the dark web may look like. This news comes as the US is preparing to usher in changes that would allow magistrate judges to authorize the mass hacking of computers, wherever in the world they may be located.

90 comments

  1. Where is this dark web, and how come I've never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seen it?

    1. Re:Where is this dark web, and how come I've never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's too dark, you can't see it without special filters.

    2. Re:Where is this dark web, and how come I've never by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's like dark matter or dark energy. You can't really interact with it, but we're sure it's there because we can somehow see its effects.

      Though in the end, we might find out that it's something completely different that we didn't take into account.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Where is this dark web, and how come I've never by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Because none of it is indexed.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    4. Re:Where is this dark web, and how come I've never by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Because none of it is indexed.

      www.google.onion

    5. Re:Where is this dark web, and how come I've never by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      You're modded funny, and it is ... but it's also completely accurate. Excellent.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    6. Re:Where is this dark web, and how come I've never by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Good jokes are funny because they're true.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. What's the commotion? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    They had a warrant!

    At this point, that's already more than could be expected.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they came for the child pornographers... and I said. Good Job!

      Seriously

    2. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid fuck. You commit three felonies a day just like the rest of us. You're just lucky, for the time being, that the laws you break don't matter to anyone in power.

    3. Re: What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us don't break child porn laws even once in their life so... Not stupid. Good job!

    4. Re:What's the commotion? by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      Are you one of them? I'm willing to argue that more than 95% of the adult population would have agreed with the authorities leveraging this kind of power to take down child pornography. As far as most are concerned, we will deal with they're abuse of power when it's not in 99% of the population's interest (and we already do).

    5. Re: What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America has just declared war on 120 countries with cyber attacks!
      Roll out the nukes people.

    6. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one of them. They're the first to point fingers at others.

      "we will deal with they're abuse of power when it's not in 99% of the population's interest (and we already do)"

      It's definitely not your kind who gets to decide what 99% of the population wants.

      (end of empty accusations)

    7. Re:What's the commotion? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      They had a warrant!

      I can say with confidence that it was not "particularly describing the place to be searched".

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good example of why child porn enforcement gets the spotlight. It makes the people sympathetic to otherwise-draconian surveillance. And then people get so surprised when they find out that these electronic fishing expeditions are used against them, for reasons that have nothing to do with child porn.

      We get the government that THEY deserve. Because they outnumber us.

    9. Re: What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moment an underage girl sends to your phone a dirty picture of herself, YOU are breaking child porn laws. People have been prosecuted for nothing more than this, since possession is illegal no matter how you obtained it, nor whether or not you knew you had it.

    10. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was done legally, with a warrant signed by a judge...

      Stories have also come out about abuses like local authorities using stingrays without proper warrants.

      They are considered criminals as well by us 'law abiding citizens', we are not as easily snookered as you seem to think

    11. Re: What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if that would ever happen to me. I'm not even a congressman.

    12. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't have a warrant in EVERY country, so this is just the tip of MAJOR cyber crimes committed in a LOT of countries.
      A US warrant is NOT a valid excuse for hacking PCs in other countries.
      It is a CRIME. Perhaps those countries should EXTRADITE those responsible to face imprisonment in their country ?
      After all, the US attempts to extradite people to the US that have NEVER set foot in the US but "may" have broken a US law IF they were in the US when they committed a "cyber crime", just like this.
      The REASON for committing a crime is NEVER taken into account as an excuse if it's you or I, so the FBI have NO excuse in saying it's about "kiddie porn".

    13. Re: What's the commotion? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Just wait 'til your daughter is really pissed 'cause you grounded her and didn't let her go to a Bieber concert...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:What's the commotion? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure it said "the computer".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:What's the commotion? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, all true, but hey, be happy with what little remains of due process and correct proceedings. At least they had a warrant. Sure, they overstepped it and it was certainly never meant to be like that (at least that would be the LESS problematic case, imagine they actually HAD a warrant that was meant to be used like that...).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From whom? I strongly doubt the courts in 119 of those 120 countries issue warrants to foreign agencies.

    17. Re:What's the commotion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So a judge signed a warrant for something outside of the country's border to make it legal... So if another country does the same allowing someone to attack something within the US that would be legal according to this?

      How about if China has a warrant to hack something in the US?
      How about if Russia has a warrant to hack something in the US?
      How about if North Korea has a warrant to hack something in the US?
      How about if US has a warrant to hack some embassy somewhere in the world?

      At what point would these types of warrants be on the same level as declaring war against another country?

  3. I think you mean the CIA by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    The FBI, by law, is not permitted to hack computers in other countries.

    If that were true, we wouldn't be in a democracy, but a plutocratic oligopoly pretending to be a democracy, living outside the Rule of Law like a Banana Republic ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I think you mean the CIA by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      If that were true, we wouldn't be in a democracy, but a plutocratic oligopoly pretending to be a democracy, living outside the Rule of Law like a Banana Republic ...

      And this is news, how?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:I think you mean the CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, like the UK?

    3. Re:I think you mean the CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI, by law, is not permitted to hack computers in other countries.

      Neither is the CIA. That doesn't mean they're not doing it.

    4. Re: I think you mean the CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're wrong. That's their fucking job.

  4. orders of magnitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several orders of magnitude larger? Looks like it's less than one order of magnitude larger.

    1. Re:Orders of magnitude by houghi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Base 2.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re: orders of magnitude by pchasco · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it!

    3. Re:orders of magnitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, in binary it would be 3 orders of magnitude...

    4. Re:orders of magnitude by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      5 different comments on "Orders of magnitude" and only one on a US agency illegally hacking computers in other countries... I think you are missing the bigger picture.

    5. Re:orders of magnitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are missing how pedantic some people can be. (Yes, I was going to post about it too...)

    6. Re:orders of magnitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 orders of magnitude. We don't use a mere decimal magnitude basis here on Slashdot ;-)

      fwiw, if you have nothing more than 2 single points to compare then leaping straight into order is the most arbitrary and needlessly sensationalistic way of going about it.

    7. Re:orders of magnitude by fisted · · Score: 1

      well, in binary it would be 11 orders of magnitude...

      FTFY

    8. Re:orders of magnitude by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing how pedantic some people can be.

      I don't think "pedantic" takes a modifier. You either are or you aren't.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    9. Re:orders of magnitude by HybridST · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod but I must post. There are most certainly levels to the art of pedantry. I am a minor grammarian where there are true doctorate-level grammar nazis just within the walls of /..

      --
      Ever notice that Cobra Commander sounds an awful lot like Star scream?
    10. Re:orders of magnitude by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to debate the definition of pedantry without also demonstrating it?

      --
      Nope, no sig
    11. Re:orders of magnitude by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Is it possible to debate the definition of pedantry without also demonstrating it?

      And thus ends the thread. :)

  5. 8000 IP addresses is not the same as 8000 computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....as they will have been watching for a while. Typical shoddy journalism,

  6. OUTER SPACE!! by darkain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to the transcripts, the FBI also hacked OUTER SPACE! (check TFA, it is right there, this isn't a joke)

    1. Re:OUTER SPACE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must have been from this guy.

  7. "actually several orders of magnitude larger." -No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's not what orders of magnitude means. 1,000 computers -> 8,000 IP's in 120 countries is not "orders of magnitude" by any stretch of math.

  8. But because it's about CP by phorm · · Score: 1

    But because the warrant was about CP, nobody will want to stand against it because that would seem like he/she is supporting child abuse as opposed to supporting due-process and proper judicial oversight/responsibility.

    1. Re: But because it's about CP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. But all those russian and chinese attacks are ok now. So no more whining about that please.

  9. 8,000 on one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warrant? Gee, that is a little bit of an indication of rampant
    "well, just an inch, just the tip, ok?"
    I cannot fathom the arrogance and purely outlaw nature of this.
    Let us hope that some common sense and the constitution infect them........

  10. Orders of magnitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >1000 becomes >8000 how is that several orders of magnitude?

  11. Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by El+Cubano · · Score: 5, Informative

    deployed malware to over one thousand alleged visitors of a dark web child pornography site. Now, it has emerged that the campaign was actually several orders of magnitude larger.

    several orders of magnitude... really?

    • base: 1,000
    • 1-order: 10,000
    • 2-order: 100,000
    • 3-order: 1,000,000

    Am I to believe that the FBI hacked over 1,000,000 computers? Oh wait, that's not at all what happened. Why is it that journalists and journalistic websites (people and organizations whose entire livelihood depends upon the written word) can't even perform the most basic of editing reviews? Were I an editor, such a clearly hyperbolic and improperly used statement would never have made it to publication.

    Note that my gripe is not with the /. editor, but with Motherboard.

    1. Re:Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. That bothered me too. You beat me to the comment.

    2. Re:Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop visiting "Fake" news sites then..

    3. Re:Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm, orders of magnitude are are usually reserved for 3 base-ten place settings, i thought?

      so:

      base: 1
      1-order: 1,000
      2-order: 1,000,000
      3-order: 1,000,000,000

      it's only per each place setting? people usually reserve "orders of magnitude" as parlance for times one thousand, no?

    4. Re:Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by fisted · · Score: 1

      no?

      No.

    5. Re:Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In base 2, it was 3 orders of magnitude larger. I mean 11 orders of magnitude.
      And in base 1...

    6. Re:Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "order of magnituide" does not need to be base-10.
      The smallest magnitude base possible is 2. "several" generally requires at least 3. So "several orders of magnituide" could be 2 to the 3rd power, which is 8, not 1000.

    7. Re:Can journalistic websites do basic editing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smallest possible magnitude is base-2. Several generally requires at least 3. 2 to the 3rd power is 8, not 1,000. So it is possible.

  12. Target practice. by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    We might as well get the practice in while we can.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  13. it's a declaration of WAR by the USA? by quantic_oscillation7 · · Score: 1

    after all, HRClinton said this during the 2016 campaign..."As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses,"

    glad she didn't win.
    although if this is true i believe the US can't do this without asking all those countries if they can do that.

    1. Re:it's a declaration of WAR by the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was just a signal to the MIC to start hiring those hackers cause MommaCyberWar is gearing up for a shopping spree.

    2. Re:it's a declaration of WAR by the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a reason why the US can do this: they have a huge military and no country will risk a military confrontation. In addition, they effectively control the military of many of their so-called allies through NATO, so those countries are not even able to defend themselves when the US attacks them. Of course these hacks and many other foreign activities of US government agencies are illegal and many could be considered acts of war. However, they get away with it each and every time and nobody does anything about it.

    3. Re: it's a declaration of WAR by the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have just launched a crippling assault on the US. I downloaded one of their shitty movies with my cyber skills. I bet they're feeling the pain now!
      If they continue attacking our country we will copy ALL the floppies.

    4. Re: it's a declaration of WAR by the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't cyberattack, it was cyberdefense.

      No one was targeted. The visitors brought it on themselves.

  14. Well, not orders of magnitude more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [quote]the campaign was actually several orders of magnitude larger[/quote]

    Swing and a miss! An order of magnitude is 10x. From 1300 IP addresses to 8000 IP addresses is a fraction of one order.

  15. They will get away with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am afraid it is safe to assume they will never be prosecuted in any of the 119 countries where they did this illegally. The US government can do whatever it wants wherever it wants and the nation where they are breaking the law will often even help them.

  16. If you don't want your computer hacked by FBI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you shouldn't do child porn?

  17. OK by no-body · · Score: 1

    Is the US now again at it or still at it - playing World Police?

    Do those laws valid in the US spread out into the whole world?

    Or, the other way around, there are countries where some simple things are penalized with death penalty, would those laws over the wire spread as well to here in the same way and then, when one travels there, applied?

    Seems people got nothing better to do than abusing whatever is available to them without any reflections on consequences...

    1. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the US is playing world police, haven't you been watching the last 20 yrs + ?

      If they don't follow our laws then we just put political and financial pressure on them until they cave. This is the new democracy apparently.

      I think I will step out of this "democracy" before some country thinks I agree with this behavior.

  18. If I were the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would encrypt their files, ask them to pay a ransom in Bitcoins, and when they pay, delete their files and arrest them if possible.

  19. And when Russian Hacks the FBI... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    They can claim they were just looking for child porn....
    Of which we know the FBI keeps a huge stash of....

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  20. US World Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternate headline: "US to ask permission from itself before hacking entire world on its whim"

  21. Turn it off by U8MyData · · Score: 1

    Turn the whole internet off and see what we get. Not even a reboot will work. I'm not a Orwellian conspiracy theorist, but it is really down to it isn't it?

    1. Re:Turn it off by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The world was never really aware of what the GCHQ, NSA and FBI could do to alter or access computers globally.
      That was the great fear of the GCHQ going back years. The question of the US, FBI and NSA using their tracking ability and having years of perfect clandestine methods exposed in open US courts.
      Now that reality of observation and tracking vs interesting people not risking the "internet" is becoming more real.
      For years the NSA, GCHQ and FBI could have watched vast criminal networks online and gathered real actionable information to use with parallel construction.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  22. Re: Where is this dark web, and how come I've neve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of those websites are FBI honeypots in the first place. They walk a fine line of morality when they themselves are the distributors of much of the illegal content for which they arrest others of possessing.

  23. no wrong doing will be admitted by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

    no one at the FBI will get even a slap on the wrist as police states take care of their own. The citizens, not so much.

  24. Re: "actually several orders of magnitude larger." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 orders of magnitude, actually (base 2)

  25. reuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was targeted to people no one cares about and would celebrate about. as long as it stays in that realm i would be cool but who's to say this wont be used on normal sites just to watch normal users by the state. it "could" be another form of surveillance state and even if known the virus scanners could allow it course something would pop up to counter it and a cycle would ensue but thats not the point. im a optimist and hope it doesnt become evil.

  26. 8000 on one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warrant? So why does anyone/everyone just assume that all >8000 were for child porn?
    It would be very tempting to sneak in a few other hacks for other things.
      ("Oops, this one wasn't for child porn... Oh well, just bag and tag 'em")

    And child porn is a pretty good cover story...
    ( I know - conspiracy theory - LOL )

    1. Re:8000 on one by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      At least I know I'm not the only one thinking that.

      Every news story the number gets bigger. What, did the FBI not keep track of how many computers they hacked? Or are they just tacking a few extra on and figuring nobody's going to actually look and see if they're telling the truth about the ever-growing pedo menace?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  27. Legal requirements in each of 120 countries? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    You said, "Several orders of magnitude larger? Looks like it's less than one order of magnitude larger."

    I'm guessing "Several orders of magnitude" is intended to refer to the huge amount of additional taxpayer money necessary to break into computers in 120 countries. Not well written, but that seems to be the underlying issue.

    I imagine that there are legal issues in each country. Without following the legal requirements, the FBI would break laws in each country, and there would be a huge international outcry.

    1. Re:Legal requirements in each of 120 countries? by epine · · Score: 1

      huge amount of additional taxpayer money idling wastefully while waiting for its big chance to break into computers in 120 countries

      FTFY.

      Why do so many people struggle with the basic idea that the margin frequently log-jams on political constraints other than funds?

      Cynicism as the last refuge of the one-track mind.

  28. Most hanus crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to undermine the importance of their work. The work or catching these sophisticated criminals is paramount but the methods used are shamefully disturbing. Those sites had been kept alive by the FBI to conduct their sting operation. Yes the FBI ran those CP sites for a period of time This can not be a method of operations or tactic used by law enforcement, its illegal and immoral to have kept the compromised sites up for a nano second longer when the power to shut it down was under their control. In my opinion they continued and contributed to the exploitation of those children to fulfill there mission. It's time to reflect and create a operation policy that would prevent the re-victimization of these children. The ends do not justify the means.

    1. Re:Most hanus crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Heinous

      Take the dick out of your ass and learn how to spell

  29. Re:If you don't want your computer hacked by FBI.. by BitterOak · · Score: 1

    Maybe you shouldn't do child porn?

    Or better yet, harden your computer against hacking. As a side effect, it will also help when the bad guys try to hack your computer to get your bank account or credit card info as well. Seriously, the bigger story here shouldn't be the over broad warrant, but the fact that most people are using vulnerable computers. I'm less concerned about the FBI getting a warrant to hack my computer as I am concerned about the fact that my computer is vulnerable to hacking in the first place.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  30. US excells at exporting US law, rules and intrest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just take the rest of the world's submission for granted.

    Thinking about human rights overseas? Thinking about equality? Thinking about the loudly exported (fictional) free and open democracy role model?

    ROFLCOPTER

    Submiss (and go flushing down the drain), or don't (and do the same, but faster).

    If there's so much gap between idol (and stored memory) and (permanent worsening) reality, there's no wonder, you'll meet dissapointed all over the planet.

    You just believe, your bad actions never ever worsens your own path.

    Wrong.

  31. i dont see the problem with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we all know the cia does drug trafficking around the globe on a daily basis

    and now we know the fbi does pedo stuff around the world

    i wonder what nasa is doing, but i bet it isnt nice and it somehow involves uranus

  32. Re: 8000 IP addresses is not the same as 8000 comp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worse: slashdot translated the 8000 ips into having 8000 computers. We don't know how many computers (or ips) were hacked, only that they're in 120 countries.

  33. economies of scale by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    So much for complaints about government inefficiency. They got a lot of mileage out of just one warrant.

    I hear the FBI also economizes in its use of the truth, too. Truth is valuable. They don't use it unless absolutely necessary.

    More efficiency. These guys are wizards!

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.