Slashdot Mirror


Black Friday Protest Sites Included An Amazon Warehouse (thecourier.co.uk)

An anonymous reader writes: Friday a group of protesters picketed Amazon's warehouse in Dunfermline, Scotland, alleging workers there face "up to 60 hours per week for little more than the minimum wage," according to an article in The Courier. "They also claim that new workers are tracked and monitored every minute of their working day and sacked if they fail to meet targets... Amazon has dismissed the claims, insisting that the firm values its employees and maintains a 'culture of direct dialogue' with them."

But around the world, more than 1 million people celebrated Buy Nothing Day on Friday, according to the editor in chief of Adbusters, saying their event has now spread to more than 60 countries. The Adbusters.org site suggested protesters stage zombie walks to parody the mindlessness of consumerism, and urged credit card-cutting ceremonies as well as "Whirl-Marts," where large groups of people "silently drive your shopping carts around in a long, inexplicable conga line without ever actually buying anything." The site is also sharing downloadable images which can be printed out for posters "to insert into public spaces."

One prominent retailer even closed both its physical and online stores Friday and gave all of its 12,000 employees the day off, according to USA Today. REI, which sells outdoor recreational equipment, was encouraging people to take advantage of Friday's free admission to many state parks for the second year in a row, and as many as 2.7 million people "pledged to participate" using the company's hashtag, #OptOutside.

86 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. i bought nothing friday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    just wanted to make sure i was included in the metrics. #fuckblackfriday

    1. Re:i bought nothing friday by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Didn't buy anything either on Friday. Maybe I will when I get some cash together again (you insensitive clod)

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re: i bought nothing friday by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a story a professor told once while helping to set up a factory in China. A few years after the Nike thing, which was 20 years ago!!

      He was adamant with the local factory owner that no one under 16 be allowed to work in the factory. For those under 10 they already had set up the daycare & educational facilities like other companies. They didn't want to repeat the Nike nightmare. It was not only a company policy, but one the prof took personally. He would not want his children working in this environment.

      The owner just laughed. The professor got stern and said this was no laughing matter and had to be taken very seriously. The owner responded that Americans are very funny. No one under 16 will work in his factory. They will go back to their prior jobs. Jobs that will pay more than before because of the factory.

      Later in the day, the prof asked what kids did here. He was a bit concerned that kids still thought they had to work... The owner replied that they will service the men standing in line outside the factory waiting for a spot in the next shift. The owner was surprised because the prof was the first American to have asked... The rest usually don't want to know.

      My prof left speechless and the conversation still haunts him 10 years later. Just a few years later the local economy had improved enough that the factory was having trouble finding workers, let alone finding kids near it. But even to this day, there are other parts of the world that are still like that.

    3. Re: i bought nothing friday by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bought three Nike Golf polos on Kohl's website yesterday for $50. I'm not a big Nike guy, but those shirts are awesome for work, and normally cost about three times that price.

      #buycott

      So let me get this right - you paid ONLY one-third the normal price for the 'privilege' of allowing Nike to use your body as a walking billboard? Good for you my man - way to grab a bargain! I suppose it never occurred to you that if you were advertising for Nike on a building you own or a magazine you publish, THEY would pay YOU for advertising for them.

      Why should plastering a company's logo on your body cost YOU money?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    4. Re: i bought nothing friday by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      So Nike shirts normally cost ten times what they're worth? What a bargain you got, paying only 3-1/3 times what a smart shopper would pay.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re: i bought nothing friday by Falos · · Score: 1

      ...they said to each other while both mud slinging.

    6. Re: i bought nothing friday by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      So let me get this right - you paid ONLY one-third the normal price for the 'privilege' of allowing Nike to use your body as a walking billboard? Good for you my man - way to grab a bargain! I suppose it never occurred to you that if you were advertising for Nike on a building you own or a magazine you publish, THEY would pay YOU for advertising for them.

      Why should plastering a company's logo on your body cost YOU money?

      I don't care whose logo is on it, they're just really nice shirts. I've tried the other brands, and they're just not as comfortable or as cool to wear. And I'm in Phoenix, Arizona where being cool matters.

    7. Re: i bought nothing friday by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Something is worth whatever somebody will pay for it. Most people do pay $50 for these shirts, though even at that amount, these are by far NOT the most expensive work shirt you can buy. But to me, they are the most comfortable work short you can buy. And I've tried other (cheaper) brands made out of the same material, and they just don't feel as good, and/or the collar curls (a peeve of mine with polo shirts) and/or the buttons take a little more work to button. So yeah, I think it's worth it. Besides, you can't get these shirts for this price even on ebay.

  2. Very good point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a good customer of Amazon's and make multiple purchases pretty much every month, but the protesters have a good point about the working conditions (and according to that NYT piece, that apparently extends to the white collar workforce as well, except maybe for the compensation). More power to them.

  3. Re:Carbon monoxide detector by itsenrique · · Score: 1

    Please come down more fully from your psychoactive drugs, or take your anti-psychoactive drugs before engaging.

  4. what a load. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    Amazon has dismissed the claims, insisting that the firm values its employees and maintains a 'culture of direct dialogue' with them

    Here's how that "direct dialogue" goes, "Oh, you have a problem with your job? Ok, I'll listen to your complaints while security escorts you out the door."

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:what a load. by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Everything is racist, everything is sexist, everything is homophobic and Amazon is not listening to it's special snowflakes employee well enough. #BlackLivesMatter #NotMyPresident

      Considering adbusters was at one time run by a jackhole named Jonathan McIntosh, sounds about right. That's the same jackhole that ran around with Anita "take things out of context" Sarkeesian.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    2. Re:what a load. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Here's how that "direct dialogue" goes, "Oh, you have a problem with your job? Ok, I'll listen to your complaints while security escorts you out the door."

      Given that this is happening in Scotland the result would very quickly favour the employee in an unfair dismissal lawsuit.

  5. How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    Whirl-Marts and any card cutting "services" are a good way to find yourself banned from a property.

    And yes folks you can in fact have Private Property with Public Access.

    1. Re:How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by laurencetux · · Score: 2

      no catching a trespassing charge (and others if the LEO is in a bad mood) is the big issue if you go to store you need to be there to 1 BUY 2 Shop 3 return an item going to a store to interfere with that store doing business is criminal

    2. Re:How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      It makes just as much sense as protesting other people going to a store on a day that should be spent giving Thanks.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by sjames · · Score: 1

      It isn't trespassing if you leave when asked to.

    4. Re:How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      It makes just as much sense as protesting other people going to a store on a day that should be spent giving Thanks.

      Um, the protest in the story is taking place in Scotland. It's not Thanksgiving in Scotland.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by laurencetux · · Score: 1

      but it is if you decide to come back (oh btw chains can and will share bans)

    6. Re:How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you go back. But since you're presumably planning to boycott anyway, so what?

      That presumes they actually have any idea who you are in the first place. They don't, and if you're smart you'll just walk out when they confront you (perhaps go whirl at another store).

    7. Re:How to get banned from a store in 3 easy steps by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      . At least that is how it sounded to me, like people were physically inside the stores, just wandering around, no intent to buy anything

      "intent"? How do you determine intent? Have you ever in your life gone into a store, say, looking for a TV, and not really intending to buy anything but just looking to see which model you want when you're ready to pull the trigger? Or maybe just getting specs so you can compare?

      If so, then you should also be banned. I've seen many people here talk about looking for a certain gizmo or something and checking it out in a store and then going home and ordering it online.

      Ban the world.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  6. 60 hours a week? by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of minimum wage people would love to get 60 hours a week of work.

    1. Re:60 hours a week? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      A lot of minimum wage people would love to get 60 hours a week of work.

      The workers are not the protesters. The workers themselves are likely happy for the overtime pay.

    2. Re:60 hours a week? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It is the UNIONS that are protesting. They didn't get their tribute.

    3. Re:60 hours a week? by Sartr · · Score: 1

      Clearly the work of a genius.

    4. Re:60 hours a week? by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What they would really love is being able to make a decent living on 40 hours a week so they can actually spend time with their family.

    5. Re:60 hours a week? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, time spent with family does nothing for the next quarter's profits. This wouldn't be a problem if the workers had any bargaining power, but the workers are also competing against warehouse robots, which work 168 hours a week on a few cents of electricity per hour.

      In fact, I'm surprised there are still workers in those warehouses given how much they cost and how they attract negative press for Amazon.

    6. Re:60 hours a week? by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that the workers would rather make a living wage than destroy their health working unsustainable hours doing manual labor and racking up medical bills they can't afford to pay. Your fat ass probably couldn't make it through a single shift in one of those sweat shops.

    7. Re:60 hours a week? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The BBC did an undercover investigation of an Amazon warehouse. They found a very fit guy, a cross country runner, and got him a job there. Amazon gave him a cart and a little hand held device that tells him where to go. The screen has a big countdown timer on it, and beeps incessantly to encourage the worker to move faster. If they don't get to the right shelf and pick the item before the countdown hits zero, they get a demerit and eventually fired.

      That kind of high pressure, physically demanding job very quickly took a toll on the guy's health. If constantly being ordered around by a computer, controlling his every movement, wasn't bad enough, the time allocated to collecting each item required moving pretty quickly. Often the automatic lights would fail and he would be wondering about in the dark. Managers showed little sympathy.

      A company that designs its jobs such that a physically fit person starts having health problems working there is evil and such practices should be banned. We got rid of most of that back in the 19th century.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:60 hours a week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about this story dated 2013? There is no mention of super fit cross-country runner. But other than that, thanks for sharing. Very informative. Is there another similar story? Please post the link if you have it.

    9. Re: 60 hours a week? by orlanz · · Score: 1

      What good old times? People keep thinking history was some glorious time. It was shit; most of it was way worse than today! There were actual threats to worry about, actual wars, not enough food to buy, not enough gas, higher ppl to home ratios, people worked in more dangerous environments, had less stuff in the house...

    10. Re:60 hours a week? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Sure, but no one wants to be forced to work 60 hours a week.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    11. Re:60 hours a week? by ranton · · Score: 1

      And your statement is bullshit. Hence why you got called out on it.

      Have you ever worked minimum wage when you required that money to pay the bills? (meaning not while in school)

      I have (well, it was about $1 over minimum wage at the time), and I certainly enjoyed times when I was able to work 60 hours per week. That meant about $2200 take home per month instead of around $1300. I can tell you I really wanted that extra $900. So while my experience doesn't speak for everyone, his statement certainly was not bullshit for me or nearly anyone I worked with at the time.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    12. Re:60 hours a week? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You sound like the psychopath. My statement is "A lot of minimum wage people would love to get 60 hours a week of work." Thats it. Now go make me a latte.

      Side note. Always - but always, be nice to the person who is preparing your food and drink.

      It will tend to taste a lot better.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:60 hours a week? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Careful where you order that. A "Latte" is a wooden beam in Germany. And you just might get it. To the neck.

      I'm going to open a coffee shop in Utah. Think I'll call it the "Latte Day Saints."

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:60 hours a week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many minimum wage workers love their job so much they actually want to spend more time there? What they actually want is more money and they will do overtime to get it, but they don't actually want to work more hours.

    15. Re:60 hours a week? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      How long before you get out of prison?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    16. Re:60 hours a week? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      I've worked in a warehouse and seen many others. It's not hard work, it's not an unhealthy environment, and unless you're stupid enough to stand under a motorized forklift it's not dangerous. Given that there's exercise involved and fresh air coming in from shipping bays, it's probably healthier than an office job.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    17. Re:60 hours a week? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the runner was temperamentally unfit for the job.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    18. Re:60 hours a week? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      How funny. You think the employer provides union membership, instead of the union.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    19. Re:60 hours a week? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The TV programme the report is based on has more detail, including footage of the guy running cross country.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:60 hours a week? by sjames · · Score: 1

      It worked OK in the '50s and '60s. The 8 hour day and the 5 day week was a thing for decades. So was closing on every Sunday and major holiday. That was right here in the U.S.

    21. Re:60 hours a week? by hoofie · · Score: 1

      This is Scotland, part of the UK. There are no medical bills to rack up as it's one of the more enlightened countries on Earth which has free medical care for EVERYONE regardless of need or ability to pay. It's not perfect but it's a damn sight better than losing your house because you hurt yourself. Oh and if you can't work due to injury the state will pay you benefits. Also note that UK Health and Safety laws are very, very tough. If employees were being injured at an Amazon warehouse due to heavy manual labour they would be dragged through the courts by the Government.

    22. Re:60 hours a week? by eionmac · · Score: 1

      The way they treat employees is why I do not buy from Amazon. I restrict my purchases so I can use 'decent shops'; cost more but most do not 'bully' employees as Amazon was shown to have done on BBC in UK. PS I live in UK, so also motivated by Amazon's deliberate tax avoidance in paying UK tax.

      --
      Regards Eion MacDonald
    23. Re:60 hours a week? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the tame words of the slave. Grow a spine and demand your right to a life.

  7. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    The Walmart effect

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  8. Friday? by sgunhouse · · Score: 1

    Many big chains (Wal-mart, etc.) have most of the big stuff Thursday night. I can't claim to have bought nothing Friday, but I spent more Thursday. (If you're protesting consumerism, you'd have to protest both days.)

  9. Re:Silly America by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Funny

    Silly America. One day they'll learn

    Friday a group of protesters picketed Amazon's warehouse in Dunfermline, Scotland

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  10. Re: Carbon monoxide detector by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did you know the average smoker is killed 17 times per day?

    OK, I don't mind the 17 times thing, but what is the cost of resuscitating this poor soul just to off him again?
    Also, is it the same smoker day after day or do you pick a new smoker everyday?
    And if it's the latter, is there a nomination process or is the selection random?
    Lastly, is this occurring near a medical supply company so the participants can cash in on Black Friday savings on things like defibrillator gel and EKG leads?

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  11. Re:Bullshit by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They did this scam last year too

    The point was to give their workers the day off, which they did, so I don't see how it is a "scam".

    ... and it increased their online sales by a large amount due to the free publicity.

    Good. They deserve it. Maybe this will serve as an example for others that treating workers well can be good business.

  12. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I didn't know they still had slavery in Scotland.

    It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just quit.

    Why don't they just quit?, have a good look at the job market in Scotland sometime, and when I say a good look, I mean try and actually get one not just count the vacancies (there is no guarantee a lot of them actually exist - there are various 'numbers games' being played), I say this as someone who does have a job and who deals with people who are either currently unemployed or will soon be in that category again on a weekday basis.
    Amazon prey on the fact that there are large pools of available labour they can exploit as and when required, and I have to point out here that they 'Pontius Pilate' the thing to an extent by making sure these 'peons' are employed by agencies, not Amazon themselves, and I do have to point out that some of this 'seasonal' workforce aren't the 'unskilled morons' that some would like to paint them, money is money.
    As to slavery...look up 'wage slavery' sometime, there are people in this country struggling to keep both warm and fed, they'll do any shitty job just to keep their heads above the waters financially, and that's what Amazon et al are banking millions off the back of.
    Welcome to the 21st fucking century...

  13. Re:What am I missing? by SeaFox · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What am I missing here... workers apply for a job, get the job, agree to and get paid a legal wage, get held accountable for what they do, and are sacked if they don't do the job. Am I missing something?

    The problem is people unable to have a normal work-life balance and have a job at the same time. I have a relative who works for Wal-Mart. When she first got hired the company was actually CLOSED on Thanksgiving, in fact, they weren't even open 24 hours then. Since then, Wal-Mart has expanded their hours and started to be open now on holidays. They expect employees to work in a all-hands-on-deck fashion that leaves people with no way to enjoy the supposed "holidays" with their own loved ones. Can you imagine having a family and being told you have to work 9-5 on Thanksgiving? Even if you were an "evening Thanksgiving" type, that's not getting off early enough to actually cook a Thanksgiving meal from scratch. And would have the energy to anyway, after working 8 hours on what has become one of the busiest shopping days of the year thanks to Black Fri^H^H^HThursday?

  14. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    working 60+ hours a week isn't healthy for one.. unfortunately, placing restrictions on that causes problems elsewhere.

  15. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Nobody has adequately explained to me the difference between needing to hold down a job in order to survive and slavery, especially when used in your context.

  16. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the 21st fucking century...

    Same as all the previous centuries? Honestly, all those who think the modern (Western) world is so progressive are really just deluding themselves.

  17. Re: love by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Love is such a strong word. They'd 'like' to be able to work 40 hours a week for the same amount of money they'd get for working 60 even better.

  18. Re:What am I missing? by sjames · · Score: 1

    You are missing a balanced society where people actually have a family that they spend time with.

    The sad/funny thing is that the very places that count on Thanksgiving to signal the start of Christmas shopping are the ones working so hard to turn it into just another Thursday. I wonder what they plan to do once they accomplish that? Perhaps they'll invade Christmas and totally kill the season that makes them so much money (and the society that surrounds them).

  19. Sigh by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    One prominent retailer even closed both its physical and online stores Friday and gave all of its 12,000 employees the day off, according to USA Today.

    Why would you close the online store? Nobody has to be there. Just let everyone know there will be no support on that day and their problems will have to be solved another day. Harbor Freight was among the companies which closed all of their stores, but they had black friday coupon deals on their site.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Probably for the same reason the people crying for bread didn't just eat cake instead.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. Re:Silly America by bgarcia · · Score: 1

    Silly America. One day they'll learn

    Friday a group of protesters picketed Amazon's warehouse in Dunfermline, Scotland

    How did all of those silly Americans get to Scotland?

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  22. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by ranton · · Score: 1

    With slavery, you have no ability to either leave a job or to better yourself so you can deserve a better one. Wage slaves have options, even if they may be dismal. I was a wage slave about 15 years ago, and it was certainly far different from anything I have heard about real slavery. Even when working on about $1 over minimum wage, I could afford to go drinking with friends, play video games, have hobbies, have some limited control over my schedule, etc. My life then had more in common with my current upper middle class lifestyle than it did with actual slavery.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  23. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    Maybe Amazon should placate the protestors by doing what most companies do these days and give each worker just 20 hours a week instead of 60...

    The only way to placate the protester is to pat them on the back for how wonderfully considerate they are. As they care more about the appearance of care than anything else. Welcome to the 'here's my list of complaints...look at how wonderful I am' generation.

  24. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    b/c Amazon drove most of the mom and pop stores, as well as many big box retailers like Tower Records and Virgin Music, out of business.

    Mom and Pop used to work 70 hours a week keeping their stores running.

  25. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    Why should such jobs pay much?

    I guess it depends on your view of how an economy works.

    I canna say how it works in Scotland, but here in the states if you are working a minimum wage job, a whole world of government subsidized services are opened to you.

    It's an interesting conundrum, as the largest employer in the US would claim that raising the minimum wage is a socialist or at least anti-capitalist action, while fully knowing that it allows their workforce to be subsidized by the taxpayers. Purposeful socialism under the guise of capitalism.

    And here's the interesting part of that whole scenario. As we travel down this road, unless we start killing those at the bottom rung, the old threat of automating the job loses it's power, because since they are already on the dole from the start, it might make more sense to just stop working altogether. Brought to us by the people whose words say one thing, and actions, another.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  26. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    there are people in this country struggling to keep both warm and fed, they'll do any shitty job just to keep their heads above the waters financially, and that's what Amazon et al are banking millions off the back of. Welcome to the 21st fucking century...

    Yes, there are many people struggling, but in comparison with other centuries they have it a heck of a lot better overall. I'd much rather be a struggling wage earner today over one 50 or a hundred years ago. Its not even close.

    I suppose we'll help all these struggling workers by not buying stuff. Lets eliminate the need for the few jobs that are available!

  27. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Amazon should give the workers the fucking option of of not working overtime. When I was unemployed I was asked to go along to a recruitment thing for Amazon by my job advisor, I walked ourt of it after about 10 minutes when they made it clear that overtime was mandatory, I was (and still am) a single parent it wasn't reasonable for me to do that many hours.

    I'm sure some people would jump at the chance of overtime, but is it right to force your employees into it?

  28. Re:Black Friday by unixisc · · Score: 1

    where large groups of people "silently drive your shopping carts around in a long, inexplicable conga line without ever actually buying anything."

    How sadistic! Why not just ask people to stay at home and do whatever - play w/ the kids, watch their favorite show, cook, do whatever, instead of causing those store employees to stand at their checkout counters waiting for the next customers!

  29. Re:What am I missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine having a family and being told you have to work 9-5 on Thanksgiving?

    Does it even matter? It's a completely bullshit holiday anyway. Now tell me I have to work on Election Day and I'll get pissed.

    Happy fuck-over-the-natives day.

    captcha: Murder

  30. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Walmart pays poorly because the jobs it hires people for are mostly unskilled labor. Training consists of "take this, put it there". The alternative to "subsidizing Walmart" is that they get nothing from Walmart and everything from the government. Which is cheaper?

    Now just between you and me, there is money to be made at Walmart. And like it or not, the higher paid positions are not exactly rocket science either.

    As for your interesting "what the market will bear" remark, it should be cheaper in the end to have WalMart pay a wage that allows it's employees to survive without government assistance. That's simple efficiency. You can't have it both ways of wanting government subsidies because cheap, while banging a free market drum.

    Raising the minimum wage is just shifting the burden of welfare funding from the public to Walmart, which will have to raise prices to compensate.

    What the holy baby jeebuz in a pup tent? If a person is working and getting paid, and living off it - it isn't welfare.

    And dear Coward, if Walmart can't pay a wage that allows it's employees to not have to take money from the government, perhaps it is using a flawed business model, and should do what the market does to failed business models. Puts them out of business.

    As their entire business model is "sell stuff cheap to poor people", you are risking killing one of the most successful businesses ever in order to achieve your social goals. And, at the end, who gets screwed? The poor who shop at Walmart.

    Sounds awesome. Make everyone poor as possible so they can shop at Walmart.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  31. Re:What am I missing? by burningcpu · · Score: 1

    A primary difference here is the necessity of health care.

  32. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    You did not address any of the points laid out. Whether you agree with them or not, those were fairly reasoned arguments. You resorted to toddler name calling. The old internet with higher barriers of entry was more erudite.

  33. Re:It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just qu by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, I drove around Seattle last week and saw half a dozen 'mom and pop' record stores and zero Tower Records.

  34. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    WalMart has competitors. If it pays much more than the competition, it will lose money. If it pays much less than the competition, it will lose employees. WalMart's advantages of efficient systems and tough negotiations with suppliers are not enough to allow them to successfully pretend that nobody else is competing with them.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  35. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    There's an additional advantage to working compared to being on the dole. You learn skills, your attitude is different. You are a better person. Yes, I do mean that if you're receiving government assistance you're inferior.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  36. Re:What am I missing? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    What is a normal work-life balance? I worked 60-80hrs/week for twenty years while I was young and retired by forty. I met a guy once who was an oil worker...two actually...who did the same thing.

  37. Re: It's a job, not slavery, why don't they just q by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Tower Records entered bankruptcy for the first time in 2004. Factors cited were the heavy debt incurred during its aggressive expansion in the 1990s, growing competition from mass discounters and Internet piracy. Mismanagement, managerial incompetence, and crippling restrictions from the first bankruptcy deal also contributed to Tower's demise. (wikipedia)

    Amazon was already well established selling CDs by then. In 1997 Amazon was big enough to be sued by Barnes and Noble, and that didn't happen by selling just "used college books".

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  38. Re:REI's actions are commendable but... by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

    I bought my last backpack (gregory denali pro) at amazon. It was $115 less expensive than REI.

  39. Re:Bullshit by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Vladimir Lenin was responsible for somewhere between 200,000 and 4,000,000 deaths, depending upon just which deaths you count. The freedom you're referring to is the "freedom" of the grave.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  40. non-event by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    a million people in the world? ha, might as well have been zero for any impact, the multi-billion dollar megacorps couldn't care.

  41. Re:Silly America by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    Silly America. One day they'll learn

    Friday a group of protesters picketed Amazon's warehouse in Dunfermline, Scotland

    Amazon is an American electronic commerce and cloud computing company, founded in July 5, 1994 by Jeff Bezos and based in Seattle, Washington.

    Yes, but the customers and employees of the Dunfermline, Scotland warehouse are not.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  42. Re:Silly America by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    Silly America. One day they'll learn

    Friday a group of protesters picketed Amazon's warehouse in Dunfermline, Scotland

    How did all of those silly Americans get to Scotland?

    Booze Cruise gone awry is my guess.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  43. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    WalMart has competitors. If it pays much more than the competition, it will lose money. If it pays much less than the competition, it will lose employees. WalMart's advantages of efficient systems and tough negotiations with suppliers are not enough to allow them to successfully pretend that nobody else is competing with them.

    So what you are saying is that competition demands lowering wages to stay competitive, so we race to the bottom of figuring out a way to pay people nothing at all, or as close to it as possible. So these companies will be hauling in the cash lake crazy from all of the money they'll make when no one can afford to buy anything because the ultimate goal is to lower the wages to the point where 100 percent of the pay is devoted to survival eating.

    It's unskilled labor, fuck 'em they can die and the company will save 100 percent of their salary then. Your argument reduces to that you would support WalMart paying nothing, and my tax dollars paying for the employees entire living. That would indeed be competitive and a great advantage for WalMart and any other retail outfit. Then the people living off my tax dollars will spend wht they have at WallMart, and......PROFIT!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  44. Re:Bullshit by wyHunter · · Score: 1

    It's just amazing what education teaches these days - that terrorists are 'freedom fighters' that 'Lenin invented freedom' and so on. Just amazing.

  45. Re:Hey guess what, low skill jobs suck by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    You have your head stuck so far up your own ass I'm not sure if it's possible to shout loud enough for you to hear this, but you are a fucking asshole. America has shitty welfare to begin with - most of the people on it are "working poor" - they work, but don't earn enough to make ends meet. Government is basically subsidizing shitty corporate culture that doesn't pay enough for people to live on.

    The one who needs a serious attitude adjustment is you.

    One meme that won't go away is the concept that there are people spending their entire lives on welfare. Most, and maybe all welfare programs today are very limited both in time and money. But the memes are the same from the 70's.

    It is an uncomfortable part of life, that despite what we are told, all of us cannot be anything we want to be. There is a whole subset of humans who are not capable of more skilled or intellectual activities.

    So what do we do with these less fortunate or less ambitious people? Eugenics is pretty distasteful as well as a big moral problem. Joe Libertarian might not like it when the tests show little Johnny is subnormal in intelligence and drive, so her has to be taken away and recycled, even though he makes a convincing argument of "adapt or die" for other people's children. All a matter of perspective.

    It isn't a question of do we make people at the bottom of the employment ladder wealthy. Being able to survive without Government handouts is not being wealthy.

    It isn't a question of the jobs at the bottom of the employment ladder being jobs for high school kids. I haven't seen a person under 30 at any McDonald's I've been in for years.

    A very uncomfortable fact that those people are trying to make a living off those jobs because they don't have any other jobs they can do. Maybe they were working in that factory down the road that closed. Now they are at McD's or WalMart.

    So we've been having a big shift in jobs that 20 years ago were considered Workplace entry level are now "careers". And the kicker is that the companies hiring these folks have managed to work out that the taxpayer funds a large part of these folk's living expenses - and people who might otherwise claim they are capitalists or Libertarian seem to be just fine with this!

    In a real pay as you go world, anyone working full time at a legal job would make enough to pay the rent and put food on the table without government handouts. And anyone having a problem with that is living in a weird fantasy world where they can hold 2 opposing viewpoints at the same time.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  46. Re:"Money to be made at Walmart" by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    You just can't dangle that claim and not tell us how. List the way, otherwise all you have is BS.

    My bad - I wrote something that can be interpreted two ways.

    The Walton children of the WalMart clan are doing just fine, despite not having a whole lot to do with the company that Sam built. I think you interpreted what I wrote as a basic employee could make money. No, the company has that pretty well locked down.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  47. Re:What you've heard about slavery by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Funny, because I heard about this guy named Joseph who went from being a slave to being a high up official in Egypt. Funny how we hear different things about being a slave.