Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Commits Millions to Help Silicon Valley's Have-Nots (fortune.com)

Facebook wants to be a better corporate citizen, which is perhaps why on Friday it announced a partnership with local community organizations near its headquarters in which it will initially commit $20 million towards making affordable housing, job training, and legal services available to more people in the area. From a report on Fortune: A few groups have signed up to participate, including Youth United for Community Action, Faith in Action Bay Area, Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto, Comite de Vecinos del Lado Oeste -- East Palo Alto, along with the local governments of East Palo Alto and Menlo Park. Here's how that first round of funding will be spread out: This new coalition will allocate $18.5 million into a fund called the Catalyst Housing Fund. The goal is to find ways to accelerate and grow the production of affordable housing in the community. Additionally, $250,000 will be given to Rebuilding Together Peninsula which seeks to assist low-income residents with the upkeep of their homes. $625,000 has been assigned to promote science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in schools, something Silicon Valley has been actively encouraging for years.

36 of 58 comments (clear)

  1. Silicon Valley have-nots? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Would this be someone who lives in a $200,000 shack with an old CRT television and a Windows laptop?

    1. Re:Silicon Valley have-nots? by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      No, they live in a car down by the river...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:Silicon Valley have-nots? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would this be someone who lives in a $200,000 shack

      You are missing a zero. Facebook is in Menlo Park, where a 3 bedroom home is over $2M, and even studio apartments go for over $1M. I am happy to see Facebook helping these people. After their mortgage payment, some of these people have so little money left that they have to settle for a 5-series BMW instead of the 7-series that they truly deserve.

    3. Re:Silicon Valley have-nots? by waterford0069 · · Score: 2

      Actually... yes the do.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    4. Re:Silicon Valley have-nots? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I pay $1466 per month for a studio apartment with an old CRT television and a Windows laptop you insensitive clod!

  2. I didn't know there were any. by waspleg · · Score: 1

    I guess I assumed they had gentrified the fuck out of the place to get rid of the "normals", you know, like in NYC.

    1. Re:I didn't know there were any. by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      But does it miss the point of Silicon Valley driving the minimum wage workers farther and farther away until they quit commuting?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  3. 20 million can buy 3 houses in San Fran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nice try Facebook.

    1. Re:20 million can buy 3 houses in San Fran by zlives · · Score: 1

      but is enough to buy one way tickets out of SF for the unwashed masses

    2. Re: 20 million can buy 3 houses in San Fran by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Are you saying we should give all of the homeless people there a free bus ticket to Portland?

    3. Re: 20 million can buy 3 houses in San Fran by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      Libs and fags are digging their own grave.

      You really should do the world a favor and choke on something.

  4. $18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    When you consider that $18.5M buys maybe 5 single-family home sized lots in the area then it's hard to take the plan seriously.

    1. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      There's no inefficiency in the market - prices are high because there is demand for housing at current prices. You can't lower prices by increasing demand, which is what throwing money at the situation will do.

    2. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point. I did some searching and found that San Jose restricts building height, which limits density. Here's what I found:

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/timothylee/2011/09/19/zoning-laws-are-strangling-silicon-valley/

    3. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I did some searching and found that San Jose restricts building height, which limits density.

      If you read the article all the way to the end, the author updated his article that the building height in San Jose is restricted by the local airport, bedrock incapable of supporting taller buildings and an active earthquake zone.

    4. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      I read to the end and his post-script about those factors seemed more speculation than anything.

    5. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I read to the end and his post-script about those factors seemed more speculation than anything.

      The 22-story height limit is set by the FAA due to air traffic patterns around the airport. Bedrock might be speculation. The earthquake zone is not speculation. The epicenter for the Loma Pieta earthquake in 1989 is 20 miles away. The epicenter for the Alum Rock earthquake a few years ago is five miles away. The San Andreas fault line — the Big One to send California real estate into the ocean that I've been waiting for 30+ years — is around here somewhere.

    6. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Imagine what a small number of high rises could mean to the housing market.

      Many of which are already coming to the market in downtown San Jose. However, all of it is luxury apartments and condos. Even my 50-year-old apartment complex outside of downtown is marketed as luxury apartments with new exterior paint and landscaping. The rent went up even though a brand new luxury apartment complex opened up down the street.

      http://news.theregistrysf.com/residential-projects-taking-downtown-san-jose-vertical/

    7. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      Regarding earthquakes there are tall buildings in lots of earthquake zones around the world.

    8. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It must be impossible to devise more sophisticated engineering for taller buildings...

      Especially if they're too heavy.

      http://sf.curbed.com/2016/8/9/12416702/millennium-tower-tilting-sinking-sf-building

    9. Re:$18.5M to fund affordable housing initiatives by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Regarding earthquakes there are tall buildings in lots of earthquake zones around the world.

      Most of those locations don't have an FAA-imposed height restriction. No one is advocating the removal of the San Jose International Airport. Remove the airport, tall buildings will sprout up. I suspect the residents of the old neighborhoods that got removed for the runaway expansion in the 1960's and the noise control zone in the 1990's will want their property back.

  5. Silly Con Valley by anthony_greer · · Score: 1

    "$625,000 has been assigned to promote science, technology, engineering, and mathematics in schools"

    Yeah...because more STEM funding will help the guy living under the bridge near you!

    Just more play to force everyone to take CS classes and devalue the skillset.

  6. Re:You can't have your cake and eat it, too. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    They think you're a troll, clearly. Just in case you're simply uninformed though; their (and even your) charitable donations are tax-deductible.

  7. $20 million? For shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's almost nothing.

    In the Bay Area where houses go for millions, rent for a single bedroom apartment is over $1600/month. A two bedroom at nearly $2700/month. This will make a few people "lucky" while doing nothing to improve the situation at hand. It'll do nothing to the cost of goods or transportation costs associated with these people.

    Most likely a few housing developers and non-profits will absorb the bulk of it. Making for some bullshitty PR that Mark blasts from his own personal soap box.

    If he donated $2 bn I'd say it was genuine. This is just horseshit, it's like me getting patted on the back for donating $2 to my local charity. Though that $2 I donate probably has a higher marginal value to me than $20 million does to Mark.

  8. I usually hate on Facebook but this is good. by MrKrillls · · Score: 1

    Like I said - "I usually hate on Facebook but this is good."

    --
    Don't step on the baby.
  9. Throwing peanuts to the proles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Like $20 million means anything to Facebook, or would achieve anything?

  10. $20 million for a corp with a $322 bil market cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is like less than a nickel from you or I. It's not even a rounding error for them.

  11. Re:You can't have your cake and eat it, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not true. If you own a home with a mortgage then 99% of the time you can also deduct your charitable giving. True, things might be limited (AMT and the such) but for most people who do itemize your charitable contributions should be 100% deductible.

    Me, I'm glad that the AC above is willing to forgo these deductions and to dissuade others so they will pay more than their "fair" share of taxes, leaving less of a residual burden on me.

    Look at IRS information on the Standard Deduction (Single $6,300, married $12,600)
    https://www.irs.com/articles/2016-federal-tax-rates-personal-exemptions-and-standard-deductions
      And IRS form 1040 A where you place your itemized deductions
    https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1040sa.pdf

    Form 1040 A gives you the option of deducting your home mortgage interest and such (lines 10-14) plus your gifits to charity (lines 16-19) in addition to several local taxes (state income taxes, property taxes... lines 6-8).

  12. They need high-speed rail to the central valley. by jclaer · · Score: 2

    Housing is cheap once you get east over the coastal ranges.

  13. Or Facebook could just pay taxes by Atmchicago · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or, Facebook could just pay taxes like the rest of us do, and contribute as proscribed by established societal norms.

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Or Facebook could just pay taxes by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Never mind that "established societal norms" is to have someone else pay the taxes.

  14. Head shopping by thunderclees · · Score: 2

    SV is expensive and Facebook needs somewhere for all of its visa workers to live.

  15. 20 million is pocket change for FB by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a strange way this illustrates perfectly what's wrong with the US. If FB would pay taxes and those taxes would go into proper schools, proper healthcare and feasible housing projects this token gesture of over-f*cking-welming 20 million USD wouldn't be necessary.

    My 2 Eurocents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:20 million is pocket change for FB by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Wow, a European showing up to point out what's wrong with America. Thanks! Where would we be without you people? If we didn't have your constant sniping and criticism, we'd be lost in a sea of positivity! Thanks again for telling us how we're wrong. It means so much, especially coming from a European.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  16. Housing too expensive? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    Build more houses. Not enough room? Relocate.
    It's not hard.

  17. Such as citizens out of work due to H1b abuse? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Facebook's support of guest workers helped create the problem.

    Perhaps if they were a bit more pro-citizen, they'd not have a problem in Silicon Valley.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.