Slashdot Mirror


Alien Life Could Thrive In the Clouds of Failed Stars (sciencemag.org)

sciencehabit writes: There's an abundant new swath of cosmic real estate that life could call home -- and the views would be spectacular. Floating out by themselves in the Milky Way galaxy are perhaps a billion cold brown dwarfs, objects many times as massive as Jupiter but not big enough to ignite as a star. According to a new study, layers of their upper atmospheres sit at temperatures and pressures resembling those on Earth, and could host microbes that surf on thermal updrafts. The idea expands the concept of a habitable zone to include a vast population of worlds that had previously gone unconsidered. "You don't necessarily need to have a terrestrial planet with a surface," says Jack Yates, a planetary scientist at the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom, who led the study. Atmospheric life isn't just for the birds. For decades, biologists have known about microbes that drift in the winds high above Earth's surface. And in 1976, Carl Sagan envisioned the kind of ecosystem that could evolve in the upper layers of Jupiter, fueled by sunlight. You could have sky plankton: small organisms he called "sinkers." Other organisms could be balloonlike "floaters," which would rise and fall in the atmosphere by manipulating their body pressure. In the years since, astronomers have also considered the prospects of microbes in the carbon dioxide atmosphere above Venus's inhospitable surface. Yates and his colleagues set out to update Sagan's calculations and to identify the sizes, densities, and life strategies of microbes that could manage to stay aloft in the habitable region of an enormous atmosphere of predominantly hydrogen gas. On such a world, small sinkers like the microbes in Earth's atmosphere or even smaller would have a better chance than Sagan's floaters, the researchers will report in an upcoming issue of The Astrophysical Journal. But a lot depends on the weather: If upwelling winds are powerful on free-floating brown dwarfs, as seems to be true in the bands of gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn, heavier creatures can carve out a niche. In the absence of sunlight, they could feed on chemical nutrients. Observations of cold brown dwarf atmospheres reveal most of the ingredients Earth life depends on: carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen, though perhaps not phosphorous.

67 comments

  1. But what would they eat? by BlytheBowman · · Score: 2

    Where would they get the proper matter to feed themselves and reproduce with?

    1. Re:But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Wendy's?

    2. Re:But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tripple Baconator w/extra bacon FTW.

    3. Re:But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where would they get the proper matter to feed themselves and reproduce with?

      They eat farts and reproduce by farting. In the name of science, of course.

    4. Re:But what would they eat? by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I see that the ACs are idiots, as usual.

      The brown dwarf does not really have fusion at its core, but it does have fission. (It is heavy, and absorbs heavy atoms from the nebular cloud it forms from, which settle to its core.) This heats the brown dwarf internally, causing convection.

      This supplies energy, and a weather system that will move raw materials around inside the brown dwarf. Dead microbes will be subducted deeper into the brown dwarf, become denaturated from the heat, and become raw materials. Those will be pushed up by convection.

      In addition to heat, brown dwarfs DO emit light from blackbody radiation, and being pretty damned hot down there (just not enough for fusion), that is quite a bit in the visible spectrum. That means photosynthetic life can persist in the temperate layers high up.

      So, what do they eat?

      1) chemicals replenished by denaturation deeper inside the star.
      2) Light emitted from deeper inside the star.
      3) each other.

    5. Re:But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They eat chemicals, light and each other? And you are calling ACs idiots? How do you eat light?

    6. Re: But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. So, Soylent Green is just microbes. But what would the first microbes eat? They're the first and there are no other microbes. Are they eating gases, aka stellar farts?

      If abiogenesis is such an inevitability, why don't we see it all the time, right here on Earth?

    7. Re:But what would they eat? by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here genius, because you are clearly an idiot.

      Chemotrophs get energy by ingesting electron donating chemical substances, which gives them the energy they need for respiration.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Heterotrophs consume other organisms to gain their energy for respiration.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Autotrophs are able to absorb inert substances, and combine them with some form of radiant or abmient energy, and turn them into lower entropy food supplies that they use to power respiration.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      So, again-- the answers are:

      1) chemicals
      2) each other
      3) light

    8. Re: But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ACs are "idiots" but you're the one convinced that aliens exist and know what their actual dietary preferences are. You write with your pretentious textbook language, but it seems that in you being so smart, you're actually stupid. It sounds like you are the one who is the actual idiot.

    9. Re: But what would they eat? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      carbon rich amino acids, ammonia, water, methane, and a whole panoply of the building blocks of life all form abiotically in interstellar dust clouds, such as what this star will form from.

      Because there is no fusion inside the star, there is not nearly as much energy to rip these complex molecules apart with, and instead they will form complex interplay and layering inside the star, moving around because of convection.

    10. Re: But what would they eat? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      keep telling yourself that AC. maybe if you repeat it enough times it will come true! (No, really, it wont.)

    11. Re:But what would they eat? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      WE HAVE THE MEATS

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    12. Re: But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "maybe if you repeat it enough times it will come true! (No, really, it wont.)"

      Sort of like the Space Nutter fantasies you cling to?

    13. Re: But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't answer the question of why we've never observed abiogenesis anywhere, including Earth.

    14. Re: But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot, AC.

    15. Re:But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I see that the ACs are idiots, as usual."

      And yet you're replying to a logged-in post... My god you're stupid.

    16. Re: But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have, you're just ignorant.

    17. Re: But what would they eat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "maybe if you repeat it enough times it will come true! (No, really, it wont.)"

      Sort of like the Space Nutter fantasies you cling to?

      Or the anti-space nutter rhetoric, holier than thou crap of trolling idiots like 110010001000

    18. Re:But what would they eat? by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      They eat chemicals, light and each other? And you are calling ACs idiots? How do you eat light?

      Holy motherfucker, have you ever heard about photosynthesis, or chemotrophs?

  2. Well there would be a lot of it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

    And if it developed space travel I wonder if it would notice our kind. Would it even interact as well as the aliens in Blindsight?

    1. Re:Well there would be a lot of it by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Would it even interact as well as the aliens in Blindsight?

      Stretching the definition of "well" there, aren't you ? :-(

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    2. Re:Well there would be a lot of it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah "to same the degree as the Aliens in Blindsight" .

      Great book.

    3. Re:Well there would be a lot of it by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty big "if". The escape velocity of a star, even a brown dwarf, is pretty high, and if you though that the Earth's atmosphere got in the way of space flight, whew! They'd need to go directly to nuclear rocket.

      Then there's the question of how large the minimum intelligent entity would be. They need to be diffuse enough to float. Whoops, that means that their brain "cells" need to communicate with each other via wireless transmission. And that implies at each entity would need a huge transmission spectrum. Possibly they could do it at the microwave level, but they might need to go to terahertz or infrared. But the diffuse means that they require an immense volume.

      Then there's the question of what they build the vehicle out of. It has to be something that will float in the area of the cloud within which they can live...or they've got to have some kind of remote manipulator.

      I really think that space flight is extremely unlikely for this kind of life form. But they might well be able to think extremely well. Possibly they would be "inherently telepathic" to the extent of only having a group mind, as the individual floating entity would probably be too simple to be intelligent.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Well there would be a lot of it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Fair arguments but I think you are assuming that their means of getting around will be too much like ours. Forget space ships. Consider a plume of information laded bacteria squirted up out of the atmosphere into the path of an orbiting asteroid. They splat on to the surface, some survive and grow into a new spacegoing species.

    5. Re:Well there would be a lot of it by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      One of the best! (Maybe spoilerish!)

      Explores the relevance of consciousness to intelligence and highlights the possibility that alien life is so different from us that our mere attempts at communication could be considered an assault.

      If you haven't read his other works I suggest the Starfish/Rifters series in it's entirety. Almost all of his works are free on his website www.rifters.com by the way.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    6. Re:Well there would be a lot of it by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Chemical reactions slow down remarkably as the temperature drops. I could envision using this as a spore transportation system, but they'd need to pick an asteroid that was either headed out-system (towards another brown dwarf) or headed towards a plausible planet. And the success rate should be expected to be less than that of wind-pollened plants. If they land on a planet they'll be evolving in the kind of environment we know about subject to things like gravity, so they'll probably need to start in an ocean...and we're back where *we* started. (Obviously there are different kinds of planet, and some of them may work, but in each case the evolutionary adaptations required would take a long time and a lot of evolution away from the star-resident form.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  3. Larry Niven Called it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Science really should read science fiction.

    1. Re:Larry Niven Called it by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more Peter Watts. When did Niven suggest this idea?

    2. Re:Larry Niven Called it by lavaboy · · Score: 1

      1984 - The Integral Trees, 1987 - The Smoke Ring...

      slightly different concept, here it's a failed planetary disk, so a failed solar system, but similar.

      --
      Steve -- If you have to call it a system, you don't know what it is.
    3. Re:Larry Niven Called it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1992 - Star Control 2, the Sylandro

      Gas giant, not brown dwarf, but close enough.

      The Slylandro are the only known race whose homeworld, which they call Source, is a Gas Giant.

      They are essentially sapient bags of gas (and a limited quantity of solid and/or liquid) that float through their homeworld's atmosphere.

      They evolved from simple, unimodular consumers that thrived in atmospheric convection currents. Originally mindless but social creatures, they developed language to better coordinate efforts to herd their food source into dense concentrations. Source has a great biodiversity for a gas giant—hundreds of species, some producers, others consumers, hunters or parasites—but the Slylandro claim to be the only ones to have evolved intelligence.

    4. Re:Larry Niven Called it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because a sci-fi writer comes up with an idea that is plausible by current science doesn't mean it exists and it doesn't mean that it's likely either.

      People who speak shit like you are the same kinds of people who think the understand science from a headline or a Science Channel show but when it comes down to actually discussing or applying science in a meaningful way you're the same fucks who turn to bashing religion and shitting out political puke.

      You wouldn't know real science if it bit you on the ass and your opinion in these matters has no value.

    5. Re:Larry Niven Called it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was my first thought. The Integral Trees was the last SF book that I read

    6. Re:Larry Niven Called it by Rei · · Score: 1

      "We know A LOT about clouds. If you've got any cloud questions, ask us."

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  4. Carl Sagan's Cosmos on possible Jupiter life by Tablizer · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Carl Sagan's Cosmos on possible Jupiter life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cozemoze. Cozemoze. I really like saying that. Cozemoze.

  5. Sinkers? Floaters? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0

    I've got alien life in my bowl too...

  6. SETI sends probe into David Hasselhoff's OneDrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was funny.

  7. But then again ... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    ... it might not.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Heard this before. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    The Integral Trees/The Smoke Ring, Larry Niven.

    1. Re:Heard this before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citaTRUMPtion needed]

    2. Re:Heard this before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Niven is shit.

      Here's a REAL writer...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Algebraist

    3. Re: Heard this before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aurthur C. Clarke A Metting with Medusa 1971 Award winner. Cyborg ballons In the upper atmosphere of a gas giant. Run into larger life than microbes.

    4. Re:Heard this before. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      The Integral Trees is a free-falling environment, but it's in the accretion disc of a neutron star, not the atmosphere of a brown dwarf.

      It's an interesting exercise in working out an environment, but TBH, far from my favourite bit of Niven. I can barely remember the plot(s), nor even if I've actually read more than a couple of the books.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  9. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i prefer a beowolf cluster of natalie portmans covered in hot grits, myself

    ph wait
    *triggered*

    port*MAN*?!?!

    me man-boobies efuse to assume gender, but this mee-mee is despicable!

  10. Alien life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a possibilty of alien life some where in space. We don't know where. I no longer care. There is no alien life until we encounter alien life. I no longer care about the possibility of life existing in the most hostile places in the universe. I don't believe it. The so called scientist don't have any proof for it. Stop making up things and just study the objects in space using all tools we have and suggest the tools we still might need to get a better understanding of the universe. That's all that we need. I don't even know why those people look at stars. Is it still to try to understand the universe, or is it like the pop science articles seem to suggest only trying to find extraterrestrial life?

    I really hope it are only the articles who give a wrong a wrong impression about astronomie. I really hope they aren't a bunch of crazy scientist believing in things like alien life they can't proof

    1. Re:Alien life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing very interesting to me is *intelligent* alien life. Multi-cellular, non-sentient alien life would be moderately interesting, but only if it was discovered in our solar system i.e. reachable by us where it could be examined in detail. Single cellular alien life that is light years away is not interesting and not worth spending a penny on. It is an exercise for academics and nothing more.

  11. Wait by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute. Maybe alien live could BE the clouds of a failed star. Think about it!

    1. Re:Wait by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      What about brown dwarves makes you think that they've "failed" in some sense? What were their pre-construction design criteria that they've failed to achieve?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  12. Hollywood context by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> Alien Life Could Thrive In the Clouds of Failed Stars

    Yeah I think they're called Scientologists.

  13. Re: Qualty for your home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asshole.

  14. Re: Qualty for your home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those microbes and alien parasites are more welcome than smelly obnoxious brown monkeys from india infesting businesses in america.

    Shouldn't you be picking out your cabinet or something, Donald?

  15. Oceans have life at different layers by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    Oceans have life at different layers, so why not gaseous atmospheres of varying densities?

    Unless there is something magical about life, its seeds are embedded in the fabric of the universe. Earth coalesced out of a dust cloud and without any human intervention, life appeared and evolved to what we have today. This is a natural process. That it could occur in circumstances other than earthlike does not strike me as farfetched. OTOH, we still can't spontaneously make life in the lab so we don't know all its secrets, and perhaps in reality, our knowledge is very limited (you don't know what you don't know).

    1. Re:Oceans have life at different layers by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Oceans have life at different layers, so why not gaseous atmospheres of varying densities?

      Except for very temporary, small-scale local "inversions", the density of atmospheres increases as you descend into them. Same physics from 100-odd Kelvin (Jupiter cloud tops) to many thousands of K (O-stars).

      OTOH, we still can't spontaneously make life in the lab YET

      FTFY

      so we don't know all its secrets, and perhaps in reality, our knowledge is very limited (you don't know what you don't know).

      We don't know what we don't know, but we do know what we do know in the laboratory - about how to construct enzymes and structures abiotically, in the beaker - and we do know what basal ("primitive") Bacteria and Archaea do in their metabolisms, and the gap is closing fast.

      Speaking as a geologist with billion-year old fossils which I collected with my own hands, I'm more confident of seeing the biochemical gap closed than I am of a strong answer to the question "did life evolve a billion, or a half-billion, or a quarter-billion years after formation of the Earth?"

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  16. No life, cannot evolve there by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    No phosphorous, it's as absolutely essential to any form of life as we know it as carbon is for more than one reason. It's a dealbreaker not to have it. No phosphorous, no life. And no there is not replacement for it, the hoopla over supposed replacement of it with arsenic in a certain bacteria has proven to be false. Replace phosphorus with arsenic and you get dead organism.

    1. Re:No life, cannot evolve there by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      The paper under discussion is a theoretical study not an observational one. They don't claim to have fund - or even looked for - phosphorus. But since we know that phosphorus is produced in the "oxygen burning" phase of large stars (I don't think the Sun will ever get there), and is present in planets (direct analysis on Earth, Moon, Mars and less directly in some asteroids ; spectroscopy as phosphine in the atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn, e.g. http://www.sciencedirect.com/s...) and in molecular clouds (spectroscopy again, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...), the there is no reason to not expect to find phosphorus in our putative brown dwarf. More - from the abundance in molecular clouds, we can make reasonable estimates of how much there is.

      Though there are a variety of non-volatile phosphorus species (e.g. metal phosphides), the presence of phosphorus in the upper atmosphere of Solar System gas giants sufficiently indicates to me that in hydrogen-helium dominated systems, appreciable amounts of phosphorus would be available. Phosphorus might be a limiting nutrient in such an environment, but it is also in some terrestrial environments (that's why farmers apply "NPK" - nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium - fertilizer by the tonne).

      the hoopla over supposed replacement of it with arsenic in a certain bacteria has proven to be false.

      That was indeed a false result.

      Replace phosphorus with arsenic and you get dead organism.

      That way of building life without phosphorus doesn't work. That is not a proof that no way of building life without phosphorus works. (But you'd probably have to do a lot more than just a straight swap of P for As.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  17. yes, but where does it come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a purely academic exercise. Perhaps life could exist there (that is, after all, the definition of a habitable zone), but how would life originate in such an environment? Biochemistry needs liquid water (OK), available energy (OK), and a "stable" environment. On Earth it might have occurred in warm ponds (unlikely) or near black smokers. What is the analogous stable place in a the atmosphere of a cooling brown dwarf? Water droplets? How long are they stable before they evaporate or precipitate?
    - proffmw

  18. Larry Niven... by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

    The Integral Trees/Smoke Ring books explore a similar idea, though it is based around a gas torus surrounding a neutron star. Definitely a fun read as Niven incorporates the physics of such a system in his world building. He did the math and thought through the model exceptionally well.

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  19. pensu.com puts poison in their pdoducts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a product from the cheap Chinese website pensu.com and their product was tainted with poisons that send my family to the hospital.

  20. Sinkers, floaters, oh my by execthis · · Score: 1

    This sounds like it would make an absolutely amazing VR world that you could cruise around in. Even more fun would be designing such a world!

  21. Gravity would crush life there by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    I can see how theoretically some balloon type structures could float on Venus ... but on a brown dwarf those structures would get quickly yanked down into the high pressure death zone.