Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Unveils 'Self-driving' Brick-and-Mortar Convenience Store (seattletimes.com)

Amazon announced Monday it has built a convenience store in downtown Seattle that deploys a gaggle of technologies similar to those used in self-driving cars to allow shoppers to come in, grab items and walk out without going through a register (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled; alternate source). From a report on Seattle Times: The 1,800 square-foot store, officially dubbed "Amazon Go," is the latest beach in brick-and-mortar retail stormed by the e-commerce giant, which already has bookstores and is working on secretive drive-through grocery locations. It's clearly a sign that Amazon sees a big opportunity in revolutionizing the staid traditions of Main Street commerce. Located on the corner of Seventh Avenue and Blanchard Street, the store is open to Amazon employees participating in a testing program. It is expected to be open to the public in early 2017.

78 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. We have those already in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is called "self checkout". You still need a person there to make sure people aren't stealing stuff. This is just a way to save on labor costs.

    1. Re: We have those already in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The people at the self-checkout registers are there when the machine (or customer) screws up, or when there is some exception which requires human interaction (ie. the self-checkout register can't currently measure a length of wire, for example, and charge the correct amount per foot).

      You can steal something anywhere in a store. I'm not sure why you'd do it at a register (there's more cameras in this area than anywhere else, to prevent theft of cash by employees).

    2. Re: We have those already in the US by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Do they check ID's when you try to buy beer?

    3. Re: We have those already in the US by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      You can steal something anywhere in a store. I'm not sure why you'd do it at a register (there's more cameras in this area than anywhere else, to prevent theft of cash by employees).

      Plausible deniability*.

      You go to the bakery section and self select a bunch of expensive pastries and place them in the non-seethrough (provided by the bakery) bag and then proceed to the self-service checkout. At that location you punch in the code for a much cheaper pastry. They system only works on a weight basis and accepts your code. So you get an instant discount that amounts to theft. Plus if you actually get caught (unlikely) you can easily blame the error on confusion in selecting the correct product at the register.

      * Not that I would advocate stealing or that my knowledge of this loophole is anything but theoretical /s

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re: We have those already in the US by bazorg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Over here in the UK all that is plausible but the customer would still risk the public embarrassment. At Tesco supermarkets, about 1 in every 4 times I use the "Scan as you shop" portable device I get a random check at the till.
      It's still practical shopping: I take one bag into the shop, scan the barcodes as I pick the products and use a specific group of tills (usually less busy) without having to take the stuff out of the bag. If I get delayed by the "random check" it's their staff that has to unpack and pack my items again. Not a huge problem for anyone involved.

      The scan as a you shop is for registered shoppers only, so it would be silly to try fraud after scanning the loyalty card that links the products to your address and identity. Non-registered shoppers using the self-checkout tills possibly get more attention and more sensitive scales to be sure that the 100 grammes of cheap pastry is not really 102 grammes of expensive pastry or cheese.

    5. Re: We have those already in the US by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Yep. The barcode scanner is used for all items, if some restricted products are scanned, the till won't let you go through to payment before the supermarket attendant comes over and approves the transaction.

    6. Re: We have those already in the US by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, because Europeans are inherently all honest and Americans are all t'ieves aren't we?

      Self-service checkouts turn honest shoppers into thieves, warn criminologists

      The study involved data from nearly 12 million shopping trips from four major British retailers as well others in the US, Belgium and Holland between 2013 and 2015

      The researchers found that introducing self-checkouts raised the rate of loss by 122 per cent to an average of 3.9 per cent of turnover.

      It is also difficult for retailers to identify whether a customer wilfully took items without scanning or were simply absentminded.

      I'm in the US and I must plead guilty to being absentminded and "stealing" a loaf of bread once. It was very crowded and I just wanted to get the hell out of there. After I exited the store I noticed it sitting there in the lower basket of my cart (not scanned or paid for). I briefly thought about going back inside and paying for it, but then I thought of the crowds and the time it would take.

      I figured I could just make it right the next time I shopped there. I never did.

      I've also seen, but never taken, the opportunity to mis-enter the codes for my produce. Am I buying the expensive apples or the cheap ones? Hmmm....I could easily claim it was an honest mistake.

      I don't do that because the risk is not worth the few pennies I might save. I also consider myself honest, but I guess I'm not that honest since I never made good on that loaf of bread.

      And they don't always watch given that I sometimes have to track down an employee when the self-checkout thinks there's a problem. Usually they just clear the register without checking to make sure I didn't cheat.

      I believe that Honesty through paranoia is a real thing. Of course sometimes they really are watching. You can never know for sure unless you try, right?

      Of course that's not going to stop everyone. Even before self-checkout some people would switch price tags, barcodes or just stuff more expensive merchandise into cheaper packaging. And then there's what's called "sweethearting" where the cashier just cooperates with the thief and doesn't ring certain things up properly if at all.

      Don't kid yourself. Shoplifting and other forms of theft are a real problem all over the world. There are people who actually make a living at it.

    7. Re: We have those already in the US by bazorg · · Score: 1

      nope, but I'd like to visit one day :)

    8. Re: We have those already in the US by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      No you don't. Some things are best left set to 'virtual'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re: We have those already in the US by Kohath · · Score: 1

      People who steal stuff from stores generally come up with elaborate, multi-step plans?

      Supermarkets are structured differently than bank vaults. Why? Because stores are structured to facilitate trade and banks are structured to secure things.

    10. Re: We have those already in the US by bazorg · · Score: 1

      ahaha.
      I've been keeping this in my bookmarks/bucket list for years. I don't think VR would be an acceptable replacement. Even if I have to dodge a few bullets here and there :)

    11. Re: We have those already in the US by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Companies adopt self-checkout because the money they save on employee wages far outweighs the money that they lose on additional theft.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re: We have those already in the US by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Despite the insistence of one or more people to mod down everything I post, if you do decide to come over and will be somewhere in the New York City area, drop me a note beforehand. I can't promise you the world, but I'll do my best to get you oriented on how we move in this country.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    13. Re: We have those already in the US by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

    14. Re: We have those already in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You would be surprised. There are plenty of "lifter" forums out there where people brag and take photos about their hauls, usually from smaller Mom and Pop stores since they tend to have less security than the big stores. Most amusing thing was one guy talking about when he was going to do his next run... The store owner was an acquaintance of mine, so I let him know. Said person's next post on the forum was how the LP guys were onto him and how he was facing felony larceny charges.

    15. Re: We have those already in the US by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, exactly. Also, most shrinkage in retail is caused by employee theft. So if anything, self-checkout helps avoid that part altogether :D

    16. Re: We have those already in the US by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      ...we can be trusted not to steal stuff in situations like that.

      Yes, you are undoubtedly all well-behaved little serfs; centuries of the feudal elites' culling have effectively seen to that...

    17. Re: We have those already in the US by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The original statement was that, in the US, there's a person sitting there to stop theft. In what way would having a person keeping an eye on the self-checkout lane stop that from happening?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. hotel mini bar like where if you bump something by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    hotel mini bar like where if you bump something you are billed?

    and one person at a time?

    1. Re:hotel mini bar like where if you bump something by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      It literally explains why and how that won't happen in TFA.

      I know, I know: "this is slashdot, we don't need no stinking articles."

  3. Lovely but. by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    So I'm going to be a naysayer here (and yes I watched the video)

    1. How do you control age restricted materials?
    2. How do you control for multiple people co-ordinating to select a complete set of goods?
    3. How are they going to use the huge amount of personal information they will collect on what you buy?
    4. You can't pay with cash.
    5. You have to have a smart phone plus the Amazon App. So it verges on "company store" mentality and all the negative connotations of "company towns"
    6. You can't come in and browse to see if you want to shop at the location before committing.
    7. How do they control for turning your phone off after entering the store (or the battery dies)?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Lovely but. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      1) not sell them
      2) don't know what you mean
      3) the same way as on there website
      4) I think that's part of the point, it's hardly a hurdle for uber
      5) yes, and 100 years ago those connotations may have been in the collective consciousness in a real way
      6) haven't watched the video, but that seems like a bad idea on their part
      7) by not letting you purchase and having a greeter/security stop you.

      Some of these will clearly be negatives, but they're betting on convenience and price being a good trade off. They don't need to be everything to everybody, they need to be something new to enough people to cover the extra overhead of a location with space for shoppers in a more prime location than a warehouse.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Lovely but. by Kohath · · Score: 2

      So I'm going to be a naysayer here (and yes I watched the video)

      1. How do you control age restricted materials?

      By not selling them. Obviously a better choice is for everyone to stop policing their neighbors' lives, but...

      2. How do you control for multiple people co-ordinating to select a complete set of goods?

      By not opening the stores in high crime neighborhoods. But mostly by not worrying about it. You know who is in the store and presumably you have cameras.

      3. How are they going to use the huge amount of personal information they will collect on what you buy?

      Add it to the info Amazon already has on what you buy from Amazon.

      4. You can't pay with cash.

      Shut down Internet commerce. You can't (generally) buy things online with cash.

      5. You have to have a smart phone plus the Amazon App. So it verges on "company store" mentality and all the negative connotations of "company towns"

      Apparently you don't know what company stores and company towns are. Hint: it's not when there are lots of competing stores around.

      6. You can't come in and browse to see if you want to shop at the location before committing.

      ... to download Amazon's free app.

      7. How do they control for turning your phone off after entering the store (or the battery dies)?

      Same way self checkout handles exception conditions.

    3. Re:Lovely but. by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      You need to watch the video. The store works by scanning a QR code on your phone in order to let you through a turnstile. That means that there is one person per phone in the store. But in reply to your reply.

      1. They show alcohol being sold.
      2. A group of people can't enter and shop as one unit. Imagine what that means for families.
      3. There is shitload more surveillance going on in this store compared to a website. Stuff gets added/emoved from your "cart" as it is picked up/placed back on the shelves.
      4. May not be an issue for Uber, but retail has always had the cash option. People have been using CC's for years in Taxis.
      5. So history is repeating itself with potential Balkanization of stores.
      6. You can only get in with QR code supplied by the App.
      7. The video emphasizes walk in/walk out with no interactions and nobody at the exit/entrance.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    4. Re:Lovely but. by Ranbot · · Score: 1

      Good questions and I'll add to them..

      How do they apply coupons?
      How does the store manage returns?
      What happens when a customer puts an item back on the shelf in the wrong place?
      What digital security measures are they taking? (not just on the database side, but criminals with RFID scanners would surely target a place like this)

      I'm not against the idea, but I'm skeptical.

    5. Re:Lovely but. by corvax · · Score: 1

      1. Controlled by in app credentials ie calls security or police of minor takes beer. (Could be in a locked case that dispenses item only if you meet requirements) 2. Also controlled in App If you are talking about your wife or kids and yourself grabbing different things you will just designate you are shopping for so and so... 3. They will use it the same way they do now. 4. Maybe they'll have a machine that you can put cash into to get a shopping code for the App Or a self checkout slow lane for the few people with cash? 5.The smart phone part does not apply here. But the Amazon App only makes sense to use at the Amazon store. You are not being Paid by Amazon and FORCED to spend your pay to buy thing in their store. 6.Who says you cant come in and browse just don't take anything. 7. If your phone dies the last thing you took off the shelf is the last thing you will be charged for. YOU will have to police yourself and KNOW if you take anything else it will be stealing. Since the app communicates with the cloud/store if you turn off your phone on purpose it will know and it will call security or the police.

    6. Re:Lovely but. by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Good questions and I'll add to them..

      How do they apply coupons?

      By not taking coupons.

      How does the store manage returns?
      What happens when a customer puts an item back on the shelf in the wrong place?

      Have guys working there to stock shelves and handle weird exception conditions.

      What digital security measures are they taking? (not just on the database side, but criminals with RFID scanners would surely target a place like this)

      Dealing with elaborate theft schemes isn't the main thing that stores worry about. Maybe the answer is: "buy theft insurance".

    7. Re:Lovely but. by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      on #1 local state laws may force an ID check / say manual lane only

    8. Re:Lovely but. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      OK, thanks.

      1) Clearly this won't work overall (for example the under 21 issue), but that doesn't mean they won't modify it for general public. Unless the state and local laws allow them to treat a pre age verified amazon account as enough proof of age

      2) Does Amazon have family accounts? That should handle the family situation for 12+, and if they don't, they probably should

      3) Is it really gathering much more than the site? Amazon makes suggestions not just on what I've purchased, but what I've looked at.

      4) depends where you are, cabbies can be the worst, but that depends on where you are, I don't really see why cash is a necessity in most stores for their success, this is certainly an area that other stores can advertise to try and compete, but I don't see it making a huge effect on the bottom line

      5) I'm not going to defend or promote Amazon and their vertical integration, I'm simply saying it's not going to be the thing that bothers people in 2016

      6) So it's like costco, but non club members can't even enter? doesn't seem like a huge negative, but probably something they should consider

      7) I'm sure there will be some security when they open to the public, as long as it can detect unpurchased items crossing through, it won't really require human interaction to purchase, and the phone off trick won't work.

      Also, it's in beta, maybe some of these (1,6,7) will be resolved before public open, or shortly afterwards. Either way, it definitely won't be for everybody, but neither is a box store in general, or we wouldn't see them closing left and right.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:Lovely but. by laurencetux · · Score: 1

      "1) Clearly this won't work overall (for example the under 21 issue), but that doesn't mean they won't modify it for general public. Unless the state and local laws allow them to treat a pre age verified amazon account as enough proof of age"

      any smart system would have a flag for "Requires Employee Verification" since i know for a fact that in NC|USA the ALE folks try to trap stores.

      Fun Factoid: In North Carolina if you have an out of state ID card it is not valid for Alcohol/Cigarettes
      Valid includes: US DL , NC ID , Military ID card , Passport (with English text)

    10. Re:Lovely but. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      In my state many bars have decided a passport card doesn't count. It's caused me trouble, because I often go out with a throw away credit card and my passport card, as there's nothing to really lose then.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  4. Re:Simple questions by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    It's hard to say, sometimes having staff is good, sometimes not.

    Web shopping used to be good because there were no sales staff pressuring or trying to mislead you. Then they figured out how to do that online too.

    On the one hand I hate car dealers, but on the other hand I can always get a pretty hefty discount from them unlike Tesla who just have a single online price and you take it or leave it.

    Japanese shops have lots of staff on the checkouts, sometimes two to a customer (one to pack, one to scan and handle payment). This applies even to low cost supermarkets and the like, because throughput is higher to offset the relatively small cost in wages. I like that. On the other hand, in the UK we have self-service checkouts to handle the same issue, but they suck and it's rare to get through one without staff assistance.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. also no 21 and up items can be sold with by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    also no 21 and up items can be sold with no one there and in some states you must use the full checkout lane.

    1. Re:also no 21 and up items can be sold with by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 2

      Believe it or not, one of the arguments against allowing grocery stores to sell beer is that the grocery stores (who are very eager to sell beer) would have to hire people over 21 to ring people up.

      It was an absurd argument and some day we'll be able to buy beer with our groceries in my state.

    2. Re:also no 21 and up items can be sold with by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I hated being in New York (upstate) in the early 00s.

      Yes, shitty beer at grocery stores, but I couldn't find a good beer anywhere, it was the worst Liquor system I've seen (short of dry counties).

      I assume beer becoming trendy has made this a lot less of an issue over the last 10 - 15 years.

      PA was a close second in shitty laws though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  6. Retail and Driving by ghoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The most common jobs for Females in the US is Retail Cashier. The most common jobs for Males in the US is driver. Amazon is coming out with a store which doesnt need cashiers and Google is coming out with a truck which doesnt need drivers.
    Just what are people with only high school supposed to do? This is not Europe where govt pays for you to go to college. Many poor families cannot afford college and need jobs which can be done with a high school education.
    If this goes on the govt. will have to fund college including a living stipend while people made redundant go back to college to learn skills for the new economy.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Retail and Driving by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      >Just what are people with only high school supposed to do?

      In the words of one of the most (in)famous capitalists:

      "I can't afford to make idle people merry. I help to support the [welfare] establishments I have mentioned: they cost enough: and those who are badly off must go there.''
      "Many can't go there; and many would rather die.''
      "If they would rather die,'' said Scrooge, ``they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population."

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Retail and Driving by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Just where do you think Zombies come from?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Retail and Driving by asylumx · · Score: 1

      What did they do before cash registers and cars existed? I'm not suggesting they will go back to that, but rather that there will be a new demand for them just like there was last time the paradigm shifted.

    4. Re:Retail and Driving by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well.... when two zombies love each other very much....

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    5. Re:Retail and Driving by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Just what are people with only high school supposed to do?

      Be unemployed, getting angrier and angrier. And if history is any indication, that always ends well.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Retail and Driving by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    7. Re:Retail and Driving by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Just what are people with only high school supposed to do? This is not Europe where govt pays for you to go to college. Many poor families cannot afford college and need jobs which can be done with a high school education.

      Votechs. The US needs to go to a more European model where students pick either a college track or a technical skills track. Maybe slightly modify it to where they split the last 2 years of high school, and make the first 2 years a much more general education, ie liberal arts, math, and life skills like basic accounting etc. After the second year if you want to go the college track you can take more advanced sciences, math, literature, etc; if you want the technical track you can start taking classes specializing in mechanics, welding, shop class, nursing, AMT, whatever. Have some classes in house and for others pair up with local (certified and approved) vocational schools or community colleges. Push federal funding for votechs and community colleges (which all happen to be cheaper than 4 year institutions) with better regulated and tracked job placement-you could even go so far as to offer internships/coops/apprenticeships with local companies or unions to help with job placement once graduated. This keeps people who either shouldn't, can't, or won't go to college from going and racking up large debts while giving them another way to obtain a career that offers a fairly decent living wage (on up to exceedingly good wage depending on field/skills/experience in the case of some vocations such as AMT, welding, or nursing).

      Now, of course there are always some people that don't even have the ability or desire to go through votech schools. In these cases that's where your burger flipping or menial jobs come in, supplemented with a little (or more, depending on situation and actual ability to work) safety net support. Couple in easy to access job retraining programs which tie in to vocational and technical fields so that older people who have been laid off or are otherwise jobless have opportunities to pivot to another field instead of relying on multiple minimum wage jobs or gig economy jobs and you have solved both the jobs issue and the mounting costs of college education.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:Retail and Driving by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      >This is not Europe where govt pays for you to go to college

      Doesn't matter because it's a broken assumption to think that college is for everyone.

      That's not the entire answer, but it's a huge part of it. Even if every unemployed person without a college degree were willing and able to get one, that would put downward pressure on salaries for the people they're now competing with.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    9. Re:Retail and Driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is skirting the real issue... Why doesn't someone have better skills than flipping burgers or ringing out customers after 12 years of public education?

      We have lost the value associated with vo-tech education. We are graduating people who can't do simple tax forms or balance a check book. We're letting people loose on society that can't follow the instructions on a box of laundry detergent...

      Public education has fallen apart and, no, funding isn't an issue. We have tons of funding. We also have a social problem that people are overlooking so they can whoop it up for their favored political party. This is what needs to change first. After that we can see how society comes together and make adjustments. Let's stop acting like we're doing our best for our children in those 12 years of already paid for education in an attempt to create a new solution looking for a problem.

    10. Re:Retail and Driving by bfpierce · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the suggestion here is.

      Are we trying to say we should halt innovation because little Johnny can't get his ass through a 2 year degree program that costs next to nothing? There's tons of financial support for Community Colleges, lack of money isn't a valid excuse.

    11. Re:Retail and Driving by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The issue with this is that in previous years Capitalists had a motive in training people for the new jobs. Now however there are 3rd world nations like India and China training people in colleges for free. It is much easier to go setup a factory in India and China because you have already trained college labor - labor for example who can supervise and fix robots. You can pay much lesser than in the US because these fresh robot techs have no student loans neither are they living in a high cost economy.
      This is made worse for those who lose their middle class jobs in the US as services and trades are very highly paid so even an unemployed factory worker stil has to pay for an expensive plumber while his competition does not.
      If you are going to allow unbridled Globalization the middle class of rich countries will have to become poorer till they are as poor as the middle class of poor countries. The elite of both rich and poor countries are rich. In fact the elite is international they are not tied to a country.
      Else you put some checks on Globalization. Allow enough to let the middle class of poorer countries get rich enough that they are demanding similar wages while during the transition period supporting the middle class of richer countries with some unfree market policies.
      Its not a zero sum game. We do not want to stop Globalization and condemn enttire countries to poverty but at the same time those whose parents have already manged to establish a high standard of living should be given some protection from competition. Raw capitalism always leads to abuses so there is nothing wrong with tempering it with some protectionism.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    12. Re:Retail and Driving by ghoul · · Score: 1

      If you think college is not for everyone and I think their are some skills needed by everyone in todays economy which are only taught at the college level then the obvious solution is to update K-12 schooling to include those skills. Skills like being able to do some programming. Understanding how public media/advertisement works to influence you. Knowing how markets/economies work so that you can save and invest efficiently. If necessary High School could be increased by 2 more years and adulthood could be defined as 21 years. When Humans used to live to 40 a boy became a man at 13. Now that humans live till 70 no harm in redefining adulthood as 21. Also add Pre-K so that by the time kids start Kindergarten they are ready to study and not spending it on Potty training and learning numbers. Make 15 years of education compulsory.
      Include real world internships into the years 11-14 of High School.
      Also encourage people to go work abroad. The Average American High School graduate is still more skilled than vast numbers of foreigners in their countries. They can still contribute. Also meeting new people and cultures will probably encourage them to go back to college or to emigrate permanently. In either case the number of non college graduates goes down.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    13. Re:Retail and Driving by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      If this goes on the govt. will have to fund college including a living stipend while people made redundant go back to college to learn skills for the new economy.

      Nope. Government-funded college is socialism--the worst evil of all. More US citizens will simply have to cope with poverty, which, though undesirable, is at least ideologically pure. Maybe buy a lottery ticket and dream big!

    14. Re:Retail and Driving by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and cut down college to 2 years for most BA / BS. And have a GED like test to get one as well.

      With the new extended HS taking place of the old AA / AS.

    15. Re:Retail and Driving by ghoul · · Score: 1

      I would suggest

      Lower-Primary - Start as Age 4 - Pre-K, K,Grade 1, Grade 2
      Upper-Primary - Start at Age 8 - Grade 3,4,5,6
      Lower Secondary School - Start at Age 12 - Grade 7,8,9,10 +Point All the human Biology stuff can be left till Grade 7 instead of introducing in Grade 6.
      Upper Secondary School/Vocational School - Start at Age 16 - Grade 11,12,13,14. 50% of the time has to be in internships/apprenticeships/AP classes in High School. 50% in life skills + Point Students are old enough legally to drive and work part time when in high school. No division between upperclassmen who can drive and lowerclass men who cant. Also there can be specialized schools like Sports schools, Carpentry school etc. All schools would share life skills part of the curriculum but the rest would be specific to a school.
      College - 3 year college. Even now the first year of college is spent catching up on stuff which really should be taught in high school. +Point People are 20 by the time they go away to college and a bit more mature and don't freak out too much at college. Also make the age to drink 20. People at college will drink. Encourage respect for the law by not having laws that will be flouted.

      Age to work part time, age to Drive , age of consent 16. Basically when you come to the new High school (Grade 10) you get to fuck,drive and work.
      Also make the age to vote, age to drink , age to enlist 20. When you come to college you get to vote, drink and fight.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    16. Re:Retail and Driving by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Here in Minneapolis, the public school system does have distinct high school programs, depending on what you want to do. My son was in a college-track one, which suited him well. Some programs are designed for people to get jobs after they graduate, without a vo-tech or community college. As far as I can tell, it seems to work.

      However, as long as there are jobs where a college degree is a legitimate plus, you haven't solved the problem of rising college costs.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  7. Finally - IBM suggested this a decade+ ago by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    Even cashiers are being automated. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    At one time Walmart pushed vendors to put RFID in all items. They hoped to remove checkout lines - fill your basket and walk out the door.

    Maybe technology has moved that magic step forward. Plus the world is **ready** for this - we've all been using self-checkout stations for awhile now --- and many of us are still waiting in the Thanksgiving lines at Walmart.

    Prime is working for our family. Beyond "Top Gear Two" (TGT :-) The Grand Tour being a favorite - we do buy more. Just click and it arrives - terrific for those things We Need but it isn't worth driving to the store to get them.

    A local grocery store is putting in some kind of "drive in" --- details short at this time. Change is coming.

  8. Yeah, but you should see them in the US by p51d007 · · Score: 2

    I was behind a YOUNG couple at a self checkout in a grocery store. She had TWO items. She scanned the item and it didn't work, then she scanned it 3 more times before it took. Then she LAYS IT BACK on the rubber mat. Scans the 2nd item and of course the machine started complaining about it not being correct. You have to place it IN the sack because that is how it knows. The WEIGHT determines it. When you scan an object, it knows the weight. After she scanned the 2nd item and then placed both in the sack, she sits her purse on the table too. It's starts complaining again. She picks it up, inserts her chipped card, and pulls it out and then inserts it again. I'm sitting there just shaking my head. She then plays with her phone, shows something to her boyfriend and by this time I'm thinking about saying something, but from their youth, and they were wearing college clothes I was thinking if I said something, they would have to run off to their safe space. It amazes me that kids that should be "connected" with all of this tech had that much trouble with a self check out. My mom is in her 80's and handles this stuff like no ones business.

    1. Re:Yeah, but you should see them in the US by unixisc · · Score: 2

      This is one of those urban legends. I'm not a Bush fan (any of them), but here is what happened. The cashier scanned a barcode, and Bush was curious about it, which people interpreted as him being totally out of touch. In fact, the barcode that was being scanned was split - either the paper containing the barcode was torn, or something, but the scanner still managed to pick up the details and come up w/ the correct reading. It was that capability that impressed HW and he asked about it. Shouldn't have made any news, but the MSM being the MSM, it did.

    2. Re:Yeah, but you should see them in the US by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      Sssssh,

      Didn't you get the memo? It's time again to be divisive and not tolerate and make fun of presidents. We did have eight years of silence, but that's almost over now.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    3. Re:Yeah, but you should see them in the US by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Which eight years was that, in which people didn't criticize the President? I'm pretty sure it hasn't been in my lifetime?

      Or are you so biased or blind that the accusations leveled against Obama, including the ACA, foreign policy, etc., didn't register?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:Yeah, but you should see them in the US by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Anybody who criticized Obama for anything was branded a racist. That's not something that was there for previous presidents

    5. Re:Yeah, but you should see them in the US by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Anyone who criticized Bush II was called unpatriotic. I got called a "black propagandist" for disagreeing with the Bush-accepted interpretations of UN Security Council resolutions. In some respects, it's the coolest thing anyone's ever called me, but I digress.

      However, I saw plenty of criticism of Obama, regardless of what the insult du jour for dissenters was. Heck, I criticized the guy myself sometimes.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. Seattle has a huge homeless population by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1
    How are they gonna track those folks who will undoubtedly stop in to "grab and go"? Folks without phones, or who just want to grab stuff and run out?

    </ gets popcorn ready>

    1. Re:Seattle has a huge homeless population by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      This is tied to your Amazon (probably Prime) account (you can't get in otherwise). If you are a bad customer,we lock you out of your account.

      And then you die a slow, unpleasant death. You have no access to bulk toothpaste and clever little bits of Chinese electronics. Not to mention movies and books that no one has ever heard of (for good reason). Or whatever else we tacked onto the Prime subscription last week (I keep forgetting just what it was).

      -- All the best, Jeff.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Seattle has a huge homeless population by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I am sure that an algorithm will impartially reject potential customers based on impartial criteria....

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:Seattle has a huge homeless population by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Cant they just walk in the exit door. If they are planning to break the law with shoplifting I am pretty sure they are not bothered about not going through turnstiles

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  10. an unlimited student loans get's you to college by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    an unlimited student loans get's you to college and it's very easy to get one.

    1. Re:an unlimited student loans get's you to college by ghoul · · Score: 1

      There are already many people indebted with college debt. If College was a choice then debt makes sense. But if college is no longer a choice and is mandatory to survie then it makes sense for society to pay for it..

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  11. We need more tech and trade schools like germany! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    We need more tech and trade schools like Germany! and they have good unions there as well.

  12. Theft by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Lol.. good luck with the loss prevention on that.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  13. "Unknown item in bagging area" by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    How would this system resolve the annoyances of existing self-checkout? What happens if your cart includes a bottle of wine or a head of lettuce? Could it sanely handle very light items or large and heavy items?

  14. Re:We need more tech and trade schools like german by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    yes but they need not be 2-4-6+ years long. also hands on is an much better fit then 4+ years of Prue class room for people who have a hard time in school / for jobs / rolls where you really don't learn that well by cramming for tests.

  15. RFID countermeausures by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    "Alexa, on what aisle can I find aluminum foil?"

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  16. If two people are standing next to each other by machinerebel · · Score: 1

    How can they tell who picked up the item?

  17. maybe some kind of badge systems to fill the gaps by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    maybe some kind of badge systems to fill the gaps.

    Right the boot camps and certs really don't add up to any thing.

    The College accreditation system can use some change. The tech/trade schools have accreditation that is more open to faster changes but did not crack down as much as they should of.

    The non tech/trade schools have accreditation that makes it hard to do fast updates to class content and does not crack down on the transfer mess and joke classes for student athletes. Minor leagues for football and basketball can go a long way in fixing that.

    When student-athletes spend more than 40 hours a week on the team they don't have time for class and The team travel schedule makes them miss a lot of class as well.

  18. Priceing errors? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    What happens when the bill is higher then the posted price do you need go through a big refund paperwork chain? vs just telling the cashier that wrong price came up. Also in laws say they must give you the lower posted price and they can't say the price went up and we do not up date the posted price till end of the day but our on line rules say we can up the price at check out.

  19. This seems very different by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    I don't think there's a checkout in this model. You just fill your bag and walk out.

    The self-service pay stations are a temp solution until they can be removed. IBM ran an ad in the 1990's that predicted the future for RFID technology - just grab items and walk out. Walmart tried to do it - requiring vendors to place RFID in all items. I don't know why the Walmart initiative failed.

    Maybe technology has made the important step forward.

    But you're correct - this is a labor saving initiative. People will be replaced by machines. Those new jobs? Robots. Here they come.

  20. Tag all the itmes by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

    The simple (TM) solution is to tag all products on display, then bill the customer for whatever he takes out of the store. The amount is deducted from a pre-registered credit or debit payment account. An alternative is to have a display terminal near the exit that will alert the customer on the items he is about to bring out, absent-mindedly or not. The customer then has the chance to return any items taken by mistake (he will still not be liable for shoplifting since he's still inside the store) or to call for the assistance of store staff if there's an error in the items scanned by the auto-checkout system

    1. Re:Tag all the itmes by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Currently, with a checkout station, I've got a list of items to be purchased, and I can examine the pricing as it goes on. At the end, there's a total price that I explicitly pay. If there's a problem, I can bring it up on the spot, and, if it isn't resolved on the spot, I can simply refuse to purchase the item involved.

      With any sort of out-the-door scan, if the store screws up in any way, it's going to be difficult to challenge. It may be difficult to detect. If there's a listed sale that's not in the system for some reason, I'm likely to miss it. I'd much rather make an itemized and formal transaction out of paying.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  21. Re: We have those already in the US. Other places by eionmac · · Score: 1

    And some who die from it!
    Shoplifter/thief in watch store in Africa switched watches from cheap to expensive and left store (paid for cheap one) assistent saw it , chased with a meat cleaver, cut of parts of thief. I watched. Took note, and always in the open market thereafter paid openly with no hidden discount.

    --
    Regards Eion MacDonald
  22. Especially convenient by jtgd · · Score: 1

    Especially convenient for those jobless folks whose job was replaced by automation. Gives them more time to look for that job that will never come.

    --
    J