Slashdot Mirror


Paris Makes All Public Transportation Free In Battle Against 'Worst Air Pollution For 10 Years' (independent.co.uk)

Paris has barred some cars from its streets and has made public transportation free as it suffers from the worst and most prolonged winter pollution for at least 10 years, the Airparif agency said on Wednesday. The Independent reports: Authorities have said only drivers with odd-numbered registration plates can drive in the capital region on Wednesday. Drivers of even-numbered cars were given the same opportunity on Tuesday, but could now be fined up to 35 EUR if they are caught behind the wheel. More than 1,700 motorists were fined for violations on Tuesday. Paris mayor Anne Hidalgo said images of smog blanketing the capital were proof of the need to reduce vehicle use in the city center. The air pollution peak is due to the combination of emissions from vehicles and from domestic wood fires as well as near windless conditions which means pollutants have not been dispersed, the Airparif agency said. "This is a record period (of pollution) for the last 10 years," Karine Leger of AirParif told AFP by telephone. For more than a week, Airparif has published readings of PM10 at more than 80 micrograms per cubic meter of air particles, triggering the pollution alert. Along with odd-numbered cars, hybrid or electric vehicles as well as those carrying three or more people will be allowed to roam the roads. Foreign and emergency vehicles will be unaffected.

239 comments

  1. But... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Many people drive a car in order not to use public transportation... And people having a car don't really care about saving a couple of euros to travel within Paris/suburbs.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that fuel costs in the EU is between double and triple that of the US, and Diesel is more popular there.

      I wish the French good luck on this, but I don't think it will do much except push homeless people into underground metro stations. I hope they raise the respective transportation taxes to cover the metro use so car drivers are "paying for it anyway"

    2. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      theres somthing called carpooling too which can help.

    3. Re: But... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      theres somthing called carpooling too which can help.

      Except, not even the French want to carpool with Frenchmen.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:But... by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right, it's a luxury that negatively affects everyone else to the point of being a health hazard, which is why it's ok to ban it. Just because they can afford it doesn't mean everyone else needs to needlessly suffer. They could just ride a bike if they wanted. Or walk.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    5. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      carpooling is as useless as public transport.

    6. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no

    7. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good enough lol

    8. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let us make layers of solutions.

    9. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and i suppose create a foundation in order to show good practices in this issue in a social way.

    10. Re:But... by skids · · Score: 1

      They could just ride a bike if they wanted. Or walk.

      Except for the ones that medically cannot do either of those two things. Or have cargo. Or need to get there faster. Or have prohibitively far to go.

    11. Re: But... by Soft · · Score: 4, Informative

      theres somthing called carpooling too which can help.

      Good point, and indeed, carpooling is encouraged in Paris on smog days: although they ban half of the cars (those with odd-numbered license plates one day, even-numbered the next), cars that transport 3 people or more are exempt from the ban.

    12. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Avoiding some confusion in the comments, Paris is making all public transportation free for one or two days alone, to reduce the amount of smog/particulate matter in the air. No, they are not making public transportation free indefinitely, this is an emergency measure... not all that different from similar stuff that China and India already did.

      These are predicted to happen in several cities around the world in particular atmospheric conditions... if things keeps getting worse though, you can predict that soon, along with heavy snow days, we'll also have heavy smog days for some cities.

    13. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Maybe the French can extend their burka ban also to 1500kg steel burkas.

    14. Re:But... by lxs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Or need to get there faster. "
      Get there faster in a car? Not in any European city.

    15. Re:But... by itsme1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      people having a car don't really care about saving a couple of euros to travel within Paris/suburbs

      I don't know about France but in Germany those "few euros" quickly add up to something that looks more like a fine precisely design to discourage the use of public transportation. One-way one person is around 5 euros for anything but the shortest stretch (you can easily pay 4.65 euro even for just one stop if crossing the tariff zones). And there's no cheaper option for a return ticket so you're looking at 20 euros for a return trip for two persons. It just doesn't compare with 1 euro in gas plus 1-1.5 euro parking (if needed).

      Plus no matter if there is no inflation, no matter if the prices for energy and gas drop the prices for public transportation go up like 4% each time I check...

      The way it is and because of loss aversion many people consider public transport not something cheap that lacks comfort but rather some expense they wouldn't do unless they're forced (like car in the shop or they can't drive because of some medical problem, or they want to drink something, etc).

    16. Re:But... by fnj · · Score: 1

      Nailed it with "or carry cargo". Every week I drive to the supermarket and pick up 20-30 kg of stuff[*]. It pretty well maxes out my Golf trunk. I couldn't possibly lug that stuff even 30 meters, let alone 10 km to take it home. No; sorry; not even with a hopelessly cumbersome cart. I'm 69 and pretty-well busted-down. I'm doing pretty well just to walk through the store and COLLECT the stuff. And no, nobody will deliver it, even if I had two pennies to rub together to pay them with.

      You can say I'm not worth society "allowing" me to live at this point; I'll just say I'm self-sufficient as long as I can make that short drive, and the drive to the post office. I use no more than 1/2 gallon of diesel fuel per week.

      [*] 3-4 gallons of spring water (I drink a lot of water), other bottled drinks totaling at least a gallon, a pack of 12 Ensures, cans of soup, etc., etc.

    17. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should build pipes underground to get water to your dwelling.

    18. Re:But... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      If things keep getting worse? Perhaps in developing countries. But such smog already was a common occurrence in large European cities in the early 20th century, and in some cities as early as the 1700s. This was mostly due to burning wood or coal for heating and cooking. The switch to natural gas for heating along with improvements in IC engine technology, and a shift from diesel to petrol (except some countries like France where diesel is still very popular), have made the air here a lot cleaner since the '60s. Things have gotten a lot better, and they are still improving.

      People still keep going on about cars and pollution, but in truth it's a small contributor these days, especially to particulate matter. Last figures for PM2.5 particulate emissions in NL show a only 5% contribution from cars (not including trucks). In contrast, container vessels contribute 17%, and a whopping 26% comes from fireplaces. Not surprising then that people already managed to work up a smog in pre-industrial times.

      If you want to help the environment and prevent smog, stop worrying about public transport, ditch your diesel and buy a modern car (in NL, maybe we ought to ditch the luxury tax on new cars that in some cases exceeds the factory price). And stop using the damn fireplace, or get an efficient closed fireplace or stove.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    19. Re:But... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Every week I drive to the supermarket and pick up 20-30 kg of stuff[*].

      Why do you do this? I haven't done a big supermarket shop in person for over 10 years. It takes 10-20 minutes to drive each way, an hour wandering around the shop, I have to queue for the checkouts, and it's just a horrible experience. All of the major supermarket chains deliver and it takes about 10-20 minutes to do the shop online (5 minutes for a routine shop where I'm just adding stuff from my favourites) and then it's delivered to my door, by a van that's delivering to a dozen other people on the way.

      I'm doing pretty well just to walk through the store and COLLECT the stuff. And no, nobody will deliver it, even if I had two pennies to rub together to pay them with.

      Delivery from most supermarkets here is free and even from the rest it's far cheaper than the cost of driving there, even if you don't factor in the cost of your time.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    20. Re:But... by peragrin · · Score: 2

      Paris and Europe did a strong diesel push for better mpg but the manufacturers cheated.

      Now they have more smog than they anticipated.

      Mean while petrol is getting cleaner. A strong push on hybrids and electrics would help quite a bit too.

      At least until trump takes office we had an EPA with a backbone. For information testing and compliance and it wasn't perfect but it drastically reduced smog and emmisions. Combined with fire code and even wood stoves with particulate filters on them and our situations is better

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    21. Re:But... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2
      I think that this is less of a problem in Paris, but it's crazy in some other places. I used to live in Swansea, and for the last few years I lived there the cost of a day ticket was less than most fares (which the drivers knew, so they'd give you the day pass if you asked for most things). At £2.30/day, it wasn't too bad, but for 3-4 of you it was often cheaper to get a taxi. We went back a few months ago and it was cheaper for one person to get a taxi for shortish hops than to take the bus and the cost of the day tickets had gone up enough that it wasn't worth it.

      The city council had spent millions remodelling the city centre to allow larger bendy busses when I was there. I never saw one more than 50% full and apparently a year or two ago they discontinued them. If they'd spent the same amount of money on more frequent, subsidised, minibuses, treating it as infrastructure that encourages people to do things that raise tax revenue rather than as a profit centre, then they'd have had far more people using public transport. Instead, privately owned bus companies have made a lot of money and it's now at a point where it's cheaper to drive than to take the bus.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:But... by pereric · · Score: 1

      I put about 20-30 kg of stuff in my bike panniers. Or you could perhaps get an cargo bike. I know a grandmother here in town who got one to transport her grandkids. 30 kg for 10 km isn't much; you could get an electric one if the distance or hills are an issue. Probably beats a owning a car in most ways if you don't driver longer than that daily. I live in Uppsala, 60 degrees north in Sweden, Europe (and manage a pool with 25 vehicles; both bikes and bike trailers). But people seems to start using cargo bikes in the US too.

      (there are legitimate reasons sometime for using a heavier vehicle like a car, but people claiming "I have to save a few minutes more of commuting" in many cases actually don't save that much time - if you take in account the cost of driving. Also, putting breathable air at risk for some convenience if you actually can go bike bike or transit seems a bit selfish ...)

    23. Re:But... by Orphis · · Score: 5, Informative

      When I worked in Paris, I lived in the suburbs surrounding Paris and worked in another one.

      Public transport was easily 1h30m of traveling time. I would have to go through the town center and back. Share the train with all the people with the flu, suffer the unpredictability of the Parisian public transport.

      In my car, it was a solid 20 minutes, and I never caught the flu. I was saving 2 hours everyday thanks to my car.

      I'm not saying it's perfect for everyone, but for some people, it's definitely really great. Would I ever take the public transport again? Probably, if there were better routes around, not like this though.

    24. Re:But... by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      The just need to buy an electric or hybrid, they aren't that much more expensive. Problem solved.

    25. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've spent plenty of time on Paris trains. They are uncomfortably overcrowded during much of the peak hours. No thank you to riding for free with even more people shoving each other around.

    26. Re:But... by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 2

      I wish the French good luck on this, but I don't think it will do much except push homeless people into underground metro stations.

      I think that you are wrong about that prediction. In my area they effectively halved the price of public transport by reducing the number of tariff zones and usage rose dramatically. It was most notable during off-peak times when the trains had been quite underused but are now fairly full until the last service.

      Previously I had advocated for making public transport completely free, and I thought it was a stupidly short-sighted move to simply reduce the costs. But after I saw how many extra people began using the system after they did that, I have had to change my mind because I don't think if they could support the extra passengers if the service was completely free; at least not without some major expansion of capacity.

    27. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you need to buy that you cannot make plans to buy it on a specific driving day?

    28. Re: But... by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      That's really only useful if you can find two people who live near you, keep the same hours, and have workplaces within easy walking distance of yours. The slug line system for DC HOV lanes is much more effective.

    29. Re:But... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

      One-way one person is around 5 euros for anything but the shortest stretch (you can easily pay 4.65 euro even for just one stop if crossing the tariff zones). And there's no cheaper option for a return ticket so you're looking at 20 euros for a return trip for two persons. It just doesn't compare with 1 euro in gas plus 1-1.5 euro parking (if needed).

      Well, I don't know where you live, but I have a lot of experience in Hamburg, Stuttgart, and Munich - not exactly known as cheap cities -, and spending 5 EUR on any one-way travel in the extended inner city is nearly impossible. I'd agree that it is still too expensive, but its not as bad as you say. For EUR 20 you can typically get a 5-person all-day unlimited ticket.

      I'm glad if your car does not depreciate, needs neither oil changes nor other service, is untaxed, and the insurance is free. Otherwise, comparing the price just based on fuel and parking is like judging the calories of a triple-size double chocolate sundae with extra cream by ignoring everything but the cherry on top...

      --

      Stephan

    30. Re:But... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's great for you, but I've never lived anywhere that had grocery delivery. Stores have recently introduced services that will, for a fee, collect your order and put it in your car for you once you get there. About $5/order, definitely not free. And that's only in the past six months.

    31. Re:But... by Whibla · · Score: 1

      While you might be right it is also the case that people generally do not appreciate things that are free. A minimal charge, even if it's only 1 euro, is a better fit for maximising overall benefit for not only the environment but also for all other 'interested parties', passengers, operators, supporting personnel, etc.

      As a carrot to get people to change their behaviour, rather than (for the moment anyway) the stick, being a tax to drive within the city - much as London has, I'd say it has a lot going for it.

    32. Re: But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Layers of French solutions.... layers like an onion?

    33. Re:But... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had the same experience in SF. 15 minutes driving including parking, or an hour and a half minimum on MUNI (bus, train, bus). Asthma plus hills plus office job equals no, so there was certainly no biking or walking going on. Nobody needs to smell my pits that bad.

      This is why we need PRT. Buses don't solve the problem because they don't go where you need them to go. Self-driving cars don't solve the problem because they won't alleviate traffic issues, only parking.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 3-4 gallons of spring water

      There's your problem.
      Water pipes have been invented for a reason.
      If you live in an area where drinking tap water isn't reasonable, you live somewhere with far more serious problems than just smog.

    35. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3-4 gallons of spring water (I drink a lot of water),

      Get a water filter you fucking dumbass.

    36. Re:But... by Kopp · · Score: 2

      Well, the tax thing is more a way to drive poor people out of the city while maintaining the rich one. I'd say that given that Paris municipality is socialist, it won't happen. But since they forbidden old cars because they pollute, while all big SUVs, Ferraris etc can still come and burn 20L of petrol to go across the city... it's not impossible they'd do something like that too

    37. Re:But... by Kopp · · Score: 1

      Ok, so you shop weekly. What about the other 6 days (or 4, not counting week-ends) ? Once i had to move our of my house, so everyday i drive a truck around the city.

    38. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water pipes have been invented for a reason.

      Yeah. Apparently to administer lead to the poors to keep them violent and stupid. .

    39. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not needed in Paris. In every movie I have seen, they all carry around a single bag of groceries, with a super long loaf of bread sticking out.

    40. Re:But... by operagost · · Score: 0
      Is it that hard to read before pontificating?

      And no, nobody will deliver it, even if I had two pennies to rub together to pay them with.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    41. Re:But... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I didn't mind the crowds on the Metro as much as the smell. I think one would be forgiven for thinking that half of Paris use the Metro stations as a latrine.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    42. Re:But... by fgouget · · Score: 1

      When I worked in Paris, I lived in the suburbs surrounding Paris and worked in another one.

      Great. Since you're not entering Paris you can take your car as usual. See not a problem for you. Now just stop ranting.

      In my car, it was a solid 20 minutes, and I never caught the flu.

      There's also flu shots for that. They cost a mere 10€ and 65% of that is reimbursed. By the way, what's the point of going to an office where you are all alone? What? You were not alone at the office? How did your car help you to not catch the flu from your crazy public-transport-using colleagues?

    43. Re:But... by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know where you live, but I have a lot of experience in Hamburg, Stuttgart, and Munich - not exactly known as cheap cities -, and spending 5 EUR on any one-way travel in the extended inner city is nearly impossible.

      Maybe your experience is outdated. Specifically if you just cross a "circle" for Munich the one-way ticket is 5.40 ... wait just for the next 2 days because then it goes up to 5.60, they were probably thinking it's too cheap...

      Note that what they call "Inner District/Munich" is 4 circles and if you go again to the same circle you have to count it again. Like you go 2-1-2 it is 3 circles = 8.40 EUR.

      I'm glad if your car does not depreciate, needs neither oil changes nor other service, is untaxed, and the insurance is free.

      We're talking about people who already own cars (and how to make them use public transport instead). Extra expenses from driving 5-10km (total) are absolutely marginal while 20+ euros (for example for going 3 U-Bahn stops and back for 2 adults) aren't.

    44. Re:But... by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Many people drive a car in order not to use public transportation...

      This seems like a very American sentiment (i.e. it always seems to be the first thing people say on Slashdot, and only on Slashdot). I don't know any one like that though I guess some of the very rich who would never mix with the plebes think that way. Most people they use their car because, for their particular case, it's the faster means of transport, just as for many others it's the public transport that's the faster and less irritating means of transport.

      And people having a car don't really care about saving a couple of euros to travel within Paris/suburbs.

      That's certainly true but it makes it less of a hassle for people who are forced to switch means of transportation for a couple of days in the year. Also it removes a reason for them to complain.

    45. Re: But... by Ralgha · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think automated cars would solve some traffic issues. Around here, most freeway jams are caused by people not knowing how to merge and fucking the whole freeway over when they try to enter at 35 mph. Automated cars would be much better at merging.

      They would also take interchange ramps at speed instead of slowing down too, which is the primary cause of fucking up a particular five mile stretch of freeway around here. So yes, traffic would get better with automated cars.

    46. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also worth noting that in Europe, their emission standards are used to limit how much CO2 they produce. In the US we are more concerned about emission you can see like smog and particulates. If they started driving US cars, or adopted our emission standards, the smog would be less.

    47. Re:But... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      In contrast, container vessels contribute 17%, and a whopping 26% comes from fireplaces

      After looking at a map, I really don't think container vessels contribute anything to Paris's smog problem. Maybe London's.

      Part of the problem is Europe pushing diesel because of its better fuel efficiency, and forgetting its big NOx pollution problems that are inherent in diesel engines. They've pushed everyone to buy diesel all this time, so it's pretty hard to suddenly change course and get everyone to throw away their 2-year-old VWs and buy brand-new gas cars, esp. when the tax incentives favor diesels.

      And stop using the damn fireplace, or get an efficient closed fireplace or stove.

      Where are they getting wood for those things? Here in the US, wood for burning in fireplaces isn't that cheap, unless you live in a rural area in which case pollution isn't a big problem anyway. Anyway, if the government wants people to use more efficient closed fireplaces, they should offer tax incentives for them, because those things are extremely expensive.

    48. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can say I'm not worth society "allowing" me to live at this point

      Anyone that would say that is a horrible excuse for a human being. Seriously, the fact that you even considered the need to state that gives me cold chills. Sure, it's not anyone else's responsibility to support you (or my or anyone else who isn't a legal dependent) ... but "allowing you to live" ? Anyone who would dare tell you that they are no longer going to allow you to live is making a threat against your life and is asking to be shot dead in self defence.

      You have every right to exist and no one, regardless of what kind of social welfare / "safety net" they create / impose / vote for, has the right to determine the state of your existence.

    49. Re:But... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      It's not emissions "you can see" that we base our standards on, it's how they affect smog. NOx emissions are invisible too (when they come out of the tailpipe), but the problem is that they react with stuff in the air to create really nasty smog. CO2 isn't just invisible, it's completely harmless as far as smog goes, as well as human health (as long as there's sufficient oxygen in the air). To us, CO2 is inert, just like nitrogen (N2). The only problem with it is that it causes global warming, but that's a global problem, not a local problem like smog. So worrying about CO2 while ignoring NOx in your emissions standards means you're sacrificing the air quality in your localities in order to try to reduce global warming.

    50. Re:But... by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 1

      Flu shots that work or flu shots that just make you sick for 2 weeks straight? Catching flu in the first place is easier and you're sick for less time.

    51. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly it seems to be like this in Tokyo as well based on every anime I've seen. They never seem to explain when they actually eat the loaf of bread that's always sticking out of the top or why it's never in a plastic bag like the loaves I can buy at my supermarket.

    52. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are commuting from suburb to suburb then you are not the use-case that public transit is generally optimized for... but you were presumably also not driving through the urban core of the city.

      The "ban" on cars in London (which was actually implemented as a surcharge rather than an outright ban, which unfortunately makes it behave more as a regressive tax than a true deterrant) only affects the urban core, which is well-served by dense and interconnected public transit. London does not try to prevent people from commuting from suburb to suburb by car, although in many cases there are reasonable bus services between neighboring suburban towns to deal with local trips.

      I'm not sure what the GP poster was suggesting, but I'm generally in favor of banning private automobiles in the urban core of a city if public transit density has reached the point that the majority of commute and leisure trips can be made in not consider San Francisco to meet that criteria (r.e. the other reply), since its rail service is very spotty and buses are so slow as to make any reasonable commute take upwards of an hour ignoring suburbs.

    53. Re:But... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      The figures were for the Netherlands. By the way, the use of diesel is being discouraged here for a while now;l the tax on the fuel is low so as not to ruin farmers and truckers who depend on it, but the high road tax on non-business diesel vehicles makes them an unattractive choice for anyone not driving a ridiculous amount of kilometers every year.

      Fireplaces are mostly being used as "decorative heating", not to actually heat the house all day, so the cost of the wood isn't a big factor. I pay €9 for a a bag of wood that lasts 2 evenings. The fact that fireplaces are only used to bring some cheer in winter, I sooner expect the government to ban their use than to subsidise better ones.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    54. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      auto fahren,
      nerven sparen,
      bus und bahn fahren!
      Seen on a bus in Munich more than 30 year ago. Sounds like they forgot the "nerven sparen" bit.

    55. Re:But... by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Flu shots are based on a guess each year of which flu strains to guard against. They've gotten the guess wrong some years, and people ended up with the flu whether they got the shot or not. If you have a weakened immune system, this is a big problem.

    56. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be fair. It is a 'pretty shitty city'.

      'Twin town' was good.

    57. Re:But... by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't know where you live, but I have a lot of experience in Hamburg, Stuttgart, and Munich - not exactly known as cheap cities -, and spending 5 EUR on any one-way travel in the extended inner city is nearly impossible.

      Maybe your experience is outdated. Specifically if you just cross a "circle" for Munich the one-way ticket is 5.40 ... wait just for the next 2 days because then it goes up to 5.60, they were probably thinking it's too cheap...

      Note that what they call "Inner District/Munich" is 4 circles and if you go again to the same circle you have to count it again. Like you go 2-1-2 it is 3 circles = 8.40 EUR.

      I'm sorry, but that is wrong, and I hope you haven't overspend for long. There is a significant difference between rings and zones. There are just 4 zones (the coloured ones on this plan). For single-trip tickets, you only count the number of zones, not the number of rings. Anything in the white zone (which is all of the built-up area of Munich) is just one zone, and is (currently) EUR 2.70 per trip. The most you can pay is EUR 10.80, which is for "4+" zones, and allows you to travel, say, from Tutzing to the airport (nominally 7 zones). And you can get a group day ticket for the green and white zones for EUR 12.20, which gets you out to Lake Starnberg, then to the Garching campus of TUM, and back to Goetheplatz for Theatre...

      The smaller rings are only used to calculate the price for subscriptions, not for single-trip and day tickets.

      --

      Stephan

    58. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Paris and Europe did a strong diesel push for better mpg but the manufacturers cheated.

      Now they have more smog than they anticipated.

      Manufacturers cheated on NOx, not on particulates.

      Mean while petrol is getting cleaner.

      They're still much dirtier than diesels. Not just in PM2.5, but also hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. A few manufacturers will be introducing particulate filters in petrol engines next year. Let's hope it helps.

    59. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also ride my bike to the grocery store. I only carry about half the weight in my panniers though. It is either 2 or 4 miles away, and it isn't that bad.

    60. Re:But... by jwdb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Every week I drive to the supermarket and pick up 20-30 kg of stuff

      This is a key cultural difference between Europeans and Americans, and it doesn't get pointed out enough. When I lived in Europe, I'd stop by the store almost every day on my way home and by what I needed for the next 24-48 hours, which'd always fit in just one bag (drank tap water). Living in the US now, I've gotten out of the habit and instead tend to buy in bulk.

      If there were more smaller supermarkets/butchers/grocers/etc more widely and evenly distributed in the US, then we wouldn't have to "carry cargo" at that scale. That's neither a quick nor an easy change to make, however.

    61. Re:But... by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Yes, the system definitely wants to make people poor, violent and stupid. That always leads to stability!

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    62. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you need to be physically in the office?

    63. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I worked in Paris, I lived in the suburbs surrounding Paris and worked in another one.

      Public transport was easily 1h30m of traveling time.

      If that's the case, I'm guessing you lived far enough out in the 'burbs that you wouldn't have been affected by the car ban this week. I mean, when I lived in the suburbs I was able to get from home to Charles de Gaulle airport, which is pretty far out, in less than 1h30 on public transit and it was a similar deal -- go from the suburbs in the wrong direction to the center of the city, then back out again. By taxi it was 30-40 minutes without entering the city at all.

      I now live in the city center. It takes 30 minutes to get to my job in the suburbs (the same one I used to live in) on public transit. The one time I took a car it was more than 1h30 (and it wasn't even rush hour). Granted that isn't typical, but from what other drivers who make a similar commute tell me, it isn't unusual either. As for the airport, well, now it's 40 minutes by public transit and the time by taxi can be a lot more or a little less, depending on time of day.

    64. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Paris I pay €73/month for unlimited travel in the entire region across all tariff zones. Granted on a per-ride basis it's more expensive for tourists, short-term or occasional residents, and people who use the public transit system infrequently and buy single-ride tickets, but considering that a place to park a car in Paris is significantly more expensive than that (in my last apartment building I think the going rate was €150/month, and that was in the suburbs), I think it's hard to argue that a car is cheaper. And the rare times that a car is more convenient, I can rent one for €9/hr or less from the electric car stand 100 m down the road.

    65. Re:But... by fgouget · · Score: 2

      Flu shots are based on a guess each year of which flu strains to guard against. They've gotten the guess wrong some years, and people ended up with the flu whether they got the shot or not. If you have a weakened immune system, this is a big problem.

      The GP seems to think taking the car is a valid alternative to taking a flu shot. That's just crazy. It's not public transportation you must avoid: it's everyone, starting with your kids if they go to school!

    66. Re:But... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > Why did you need to be physically in the office?

      There's this thing called "paperwork". And much of the stuff is confidential, and cannot be copied and handed out to a dozen workers. And try to keep them all synced with up-to-date copies, versus merely replacing the master copy in the main office. And before you mention doing everything remote...

      1) Sometimes there is physical equipment to fix/set. Not everybody is a paper-pusher.

      2) Unlike most Slashdotters, the average person knows zilch about security, and any confidential stuff on their home computers will be slurped up by the bad guys in a few minutes.

      3) If it's possible for Bill in the boonies to do the work remote, then it's possible for Madheev in Mumbai to do the same job... for a fraction of the pay.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    67. Re:But... by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      You are right, but the point still stands: once you step over a zone border (which is what I mentioned from the original post) the ticket is 5+ euro (well, if it doesn't qualify for Kurzstrecke, 1-2 stops which is for U-Bahn for example). YES, you can go a long way with 2.70 (2.80 from Sunday) for a single-zone ticket but once you're outside "the white zone" every time you step on the U-Bahn feels like you've been fined. Again, assuming you have already a car and you need to decide for a one-off trip: do I take the car or public transport.

      We aren't talking about suburbs that are tens of km away from city limits, we aren't talking about gated communities for billionaires, we aren't talking about some small village in the woods that's hard to service by public transport.

    68. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a shift from diesel to petrol (except some countries like France where diesel is still very popular), have made the air here a lot cleaner since the '60s.

      There has been no such shift. Diesel passenger cars were rare until the early 1980s and their market share grew gradually from then on. Moreover, such a shift would not have made the air cleaner. Before fuel injection and three-way catalysts with a lambda probe became standard in petrol engines (around 1990), diesel engines were significantly cleaner than petrols. Diesels caught up a bit when direct injection became common (early 1990s), but petrols remained cleaner until Euro 5 effectively mandated particulate filters for diesels and petrol engines started to use direct injection without particulate filters.

    69. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has stricter emission standards for NOx, but they are laxer for everything else (including particulates). Adopting US emissions standard would be slightly better for people with respiratory diseases in densely populated areas, but it would make smog worse (if manufacturers would actually use the additional leeway).

    70. Re:But... by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      It's a little out there, but it's not wrong. Contagions can spread in places where there are a lot of people stuck close together, which is what public transport is during the rush. People aren't generally crammed together in their homes or workplaces. Things can still spread, but not easily.

    71. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can fit a lot in a backpack (e.g.), although the gallons of water just seem hard to carry. I likely can drink a gallon of beer and red wine in a day, so I have to say I can't fault you much on having a water habit (but I can pretend beer is a reliable source of clean water of historical precedence!)
      I guess I have some moral duty to try not getting busted-down FAR before reaching 69. I like to play the "environment police" too, but I have a problem of indoor pollution and deliberately polluting my own lungs too. I guess that's the "next frontier" in green environmentalism at least for me.

    72. Re:But... by fgouget · · Score: 1

      People aren't generally crammed together in their homes or workplaces. Things can still spread, but not easily.

      Are you saying that couples don't sleep together and never kiss their children? I think you should check up on this family concept. Even at work people shake hands or even kiss (yeah, certainly not in the US for the latter, though Americans are known to hug sometimes which from a contagion point of view is probably not so different). At least in public transports you don't kiss or shake hands with everyone you come across ;-)

    73. Re:But... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Many people drive a car in order not to use public transportation... And people having a car don't really care about saving a couple of euros to travel within Paris/suburbs.

      Here's the thing. Reducing fares for transit in general everywhere would encourage usage and point out the need for more buses. An anonymous tracking app or transponder can be designed so that people can each have one, thereby illuminating where they like to go - the transit system can optimize routes to make the experience better (minimizing the pain). Overall, with more people in the buses, the roads become less congested and work better for people who have suboptimal trips. Using transit a lot does save people money, so they can afford better cars, perhaps hybrids and electric. Taking all measures to maximize transit usage worldwide would make a big difference in pollution.

      The big question is how to pay for it. It's a bit of a catch 22. If people want to use transit more tax revenue could drop as people spend less on cars and carry less stuff out of the stores (how much can you carry from the bus stop?). However, smart retailers might hire strong teenagers or perhaps people who need exercise to be mules.

      Retailers and road planners have made it easy for many car users to get from A to B in a fraction of an hour. Almost paradoxically the problem is being exacerbated by many people choosing to live in suburbs because of the great convenience of transportation. What could entice and accommodate people to live closer to work? The suburbs offer larger and more affordable homes, for one thing. I suggest that family-friendly neighborhoods with large multistory residential be built near the places where vast numbers of people work because that is the source of traffic. Land costs an arm and a leg in these places so the buildings have to be tall - not like Paris, more like Dubai. However, there has to be enough supply to make the homes affordable - not like Dubai.

      Another thing is that the industry and hence the populace has to be diverse and flexible. Numerous, multistory but affordable residential neighborhoods require big money to kickstart. Many large cities have little houses relatively close to the city centre full of people believing one day they can sell their little gold mines yet they are still living there because developers are not into losing money. There needs to be foresight to rebuild the residential and move people closer to work.

      In my city I see this happening here and there because the economy was strong at the time of the rebuild. Indeed, many rebuilds across the world can kill a couple of birds with one rock, paper, or scissors. The economy would be stimulated while pollution will be reduced. More people even save time on their commutes. A no-outsourcing job creation idea, Mr. Trump or Mr. Obama. How nice is that?

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    74. Re: But... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      theres somthing called carpooling too which can help.

      Good point, and indeed, carpooling is encouraged in Paris on smog days: although they ban half of the cars (those with odd-numbered license plates one day, even-numbered the next), cars that transport 3 people or more are exempt from the ban.

      Yo, register your car twice, even the odds.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    75. Re: But... by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think automated cars would solve some traffic issues. Around here, most freeway jams are caused by people not knowing how to merge and fucking the whole freeway over when they try to enter at 35 mph. Automated cars would be much better at merging.

      They would also take interchange ramps at speed instead of slowing down too, which is the primary cause of fucking up a particular five mile stretch of freeway around here. So yes, traffic would get better with automated cars.

      Amazing, I didn't know until you expressed the actual problem. Fucking. The whole problem is caused by too much fucking. Less fucking, fewer people, things get better.

      --
      Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
    76. Re:But... by samwichse · · Score: 1

      NOx gases react to form smog and acid rain as well as being central to the formation of tropospheric ozone.

      --Wikipedia

    77. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people having a car don't really care about saving a couple of euros to travel within Paris/suburbs

      I don't know about France but in Germany those "few euros" quickly add up to something that looks more like a fine precisely design to discourage the use of public transportation. One-way one person is around 5 euros for anything

      I'm parisian.

      In Paris, a ticket costs 1.4 € ; and the monthly price for paris and the entire suburbs is now around 70 €.
      It's immensely cheaper than using a car.

      Concerning the time spent, if you're using a direct line, public transportation is generally a lot quicker, and with a lot less variance. If you aren't, then a car may be useful. Most of my colleagues don't own a car, as it would be totally useless, mainly from the time needed to find a parking slot.

      Finally, the ban on car driving discussed here only applies to Paris center, not to the suburbs.

  2. To avoid confusion... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Avoiding some confusion in the comments, Paris is making all public transportation free for one or two days alone, to reduce the ammount of smog/particulate matter in the air. No, they are not making public transportation free indefinitely, this is an emergency measure... not all that different from similar stuff that China and India already did.

    These are predicted to happen in several cities around the world in particular atmospheric conditions... if things keeps getting worse though, you can predict that soon, along with heavy snow days, we'll also have heavy smog days for some cities.

    1. Re:To avoid confusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it makes sense, though if it happened here I wouldn't mind (as long as it also comes with a partial refund of my insanely overpriced vehicle registration and 3rd party insurance).

    2. Re: To avoid confusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reminds me of when burger king made all wappers 1usd for a good year or two.

    3. Re:To avoid confusion... by ripvlan · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they could get the cars to drive faster and faster around the Arc - they could generate a wind and push the smog out of the city!

      All cars must be equipped with a Fin on the roof. Whether it be a human Fin flapping his arms or a shark-like Fin probably doesn't make much difference.

    4. Re:To avoid confusion... by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      These are predicted to happen in several cities around the world in particular atmospheric conditions... if things keeps getting worse though, you can predict that soon, along with heavy snow days, we'll also have heavy smog days for some cities.

      This is old hat here in Los Angeles. There is a whole series of defined smog levels with different suggested and mandatory actions associated with each. There hasn't been a stage 3 alert (the highest level) since 1974, and even the lower level alerts are extremely rare, largely because Southern California adopted a really comprehensive approach to cleaning up the air. So it's only going to get worse in other places if they are fatalistic about it. If they are aggressive about trying to prevent smog, they can succeed.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    5. Re:To avoid confusion... by godrik · · Score: 2

      I am not sure why they are talking about that. Similar measures happen almost every year in Paris. Pollution goes high and they shut down local traffic for a few days and promote public transportation as an alternative.
      It is the first time I see it on Slashdot, but it happens frequently.

  3. IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2011 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2011 costs forced them to cut it to just low-income seniors.

  4. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2011 costs forced them to cut it to just low-income seniors.

    No, there are no free rides. What you mean is, "Illinois decided to have taxpayers buy rides for certain people from 2008 to 2011" ... and ... "they couldn't get the taxpayers to pay even more, so they cut down the number of rides the taxpayers were buying to a more select group of those certain people."

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  5. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, you mean that Illinois decided to serve the elderly population by accommodating their situation and get them off the roads since many of them were forced to continue driving, thereby putting everybody at risk, but a bunch of twats decided that was just unacceptable, but they couldn't quite find a way to kill the entire, program, let alone turn them into Soylent Green.

  6. Re:domestic wood fires by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe an unpopular oppinion

    Well being completely untrue tends to have that effect on an opinion.

    This has nothing to do with refugees (Who are not 'burning shit' in paris). Calais was a good 300+ km away, nearly a year ago, and ironically the fires where lit by englishmen.

    But hey, keep mashing the crazy keys Anonymous Coward.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  7. Re: domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they mean ACTUAL WOOD FIRES, as you'd know if you weren't a xenophobic shit.

    https://www.frenchentree.com/blog/paris-bans-open-fires-to-reduce-pollution/
    http://www.france24.com/en/20141209-paris-log-fire-ban-goes-flames

  8. To avoid collection. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    Maybe turn the Eiffel Tower into a giant ionic collector?

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:To avoid collection. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe turn the Eiffel Tower into a giant ionic collector?

      It's already a giant ironic collector.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:To avoid collection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack it into some insulators, then ramp up the voltage until the coronal discharge starts - how cool would that look at night!

      For added fun you could modulate the voltage like a giant singing tesla coil.

    3. Re:To avoid collection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civ4 taught me that the Eiffel Tower is made out of Copper.

      Oh, and it gives a broadcast tower in every city.

  9. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad to see AmeriKKKa hasn't (yet) cornered the market on lying right-wingnut fucktards.

  10. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are still many very old houses with indoor fireplaces in the towns surrounding the Paris city proper. In winter the smell of burnt log is unmistakable.

    Paris is in a river basin where there used to be a swamp. When the airflow stops, pollutants get stuck there.

  11. Re:I propose free probiotics instead by grub · · Score: 0

    I found this oddly hilarious. Well done!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  12. Finially a good reason to buy that second car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just need to make sure the license plates are 'right'.. I wonder if theres anything in place to tie odd/even numbers to a registered family name?

  13. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 0

    No, you mean "Rod Blagojevich decided to have taxpayers buy rides for certain people as a re-election tool, but then he went to jail, so they rolled it back as far as they could get away with."

  14. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or libtards with their heads buried so far up their own asses that they can't see what's actually going on around them.

  15. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

    To be clear about exactly what happened.

    In 2007~2008 the CTA was having financial difficulties. The Illinois legislature made a deal to bailout the CTA from some financial difficulties.

    At the last minute Governor Blago, who is now in jail for trying to sell a Senate set, thew in an additional condition: free rides on all Il public transportation for handicapped and seniors.

    It really pissed the legislature off because they had to redo the whole budget, but it got passed. He looked like a hero to seniors and the handicapped.

    Eventually he got inmpeached and the new Gov discovered that free rides were not sustainable. So they means tested it.

    Keep in mind though, that a largbe part of the cost is due to pensions for Chicago machine "cronies".

  16. Re:domestic wood fires by quax · · Score: 1

    There goes the /. neighborhood. Another AC full of shit, unfortunately yours can't even be burned, albeit it is indicative of a flaming ahole.

  17. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    What does that even mean? Forced to continue driving? Driving is one of the most expensive hobbies in the world, and if you can afford to drive you can afford the far cheaper option of public transportation and taxi's.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  18. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow, holy fuck that's a lot of mental gymnastics you have going on there. The refugees from Calais were in Calais much more recently than a year ago (try October) and ended up mostly moving elsewhere - including Paris. No Englishmen lit fires in Calais - the French government would have thrown a fucking fit the likes of which you haven't seen since the early twentieth century if that were the case. The English did turn down a bunch of migrants, and France obliged by not sending them to England without authorization.

    Many of the migrants did end up in Paris, though. Here's a Reuters article for you: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-paris-idUSKBN12Z0JR

  19. Way ahead of you by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I'm in Phoenix, Az and we've already got smog days. I can't think of a good reason not to have free public transportation besides the classic line "But who's gonna pay for it?"...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Way ahead of you by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm in Phoenix, Az

      Are you looking for sympathy?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Way ahead of you by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a good reason not to have free public transportation besides the classic line "But who's gonna pay for it?"...

      How about "Will this solve the problem I am trying to solve?"

      The answer is probably no, that it will not solve your smog problem. It would have a minimal impact on particulate emissions that are due to transportation. Getting even 5% of the people to use public transport that do not use it already would be a huge success, and that at most reduces emissions by.... 5%.

      Public transport is already cheaper than driving. Cost isnt enough incentive. You would have to pay people to ride to provide enough incentive.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Way ahead of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public transport is already cheaper than driving. Cost isnt enough incentive.

      BULLSHIT

      MBTA commuter rail costs about $20 for a ride that burns about $4 of automobile fuel and $1 of vehicle depreciation

    4. Re:Way ahead of you by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      One issue with public transportation in the US (not so much in the EU) is that everyone assumes that the primary incentive to get people to use it must be cost. As a result, it's usually run on an absurdly low budget, given revenues are only a fraction of costs, and inevitably it ends up not being terribly useful. Which means few people ride it, at any cost.

      If you want public transportation to be popular, you need to make it useful. Make it useful enough, and people will use it, even if the prices are similar to, or even higher than, other forms of transportation.

      One Parisian above claims that it takes an hour and a half to cross the city to get from one suburb to another, while it takes 20 minutes by car. That, to me, is a sign that there aren't enough buses filling in the gaps. Here in Martin County, Florida the "bus system" appears to be designed to turn tax money into jobs, rather than provide a useful service, with buses spaced an hour apart, taking an inordinate length of time to cross the county, only offered during daylight hours, and providing no effective county to county service. If they ran every ten minutes, with express buses linking to nearby county systems, I'd probably use it, because I hate driving.

      On a wider scale (yes, I know this isn't directly comparable, it's to demonstrate the point about usefulness vs price), Amtrak's Acela Express charges passengers orders of magnitude more per mile than, say, the Silver Meteor. It also carries 10-20x as many passengers. Why? Because it's useful. It links major population centers with an hourly service, rather than linking minor towns and cities with a once-a-day service. So people are willing to pay big money to travel on it. Which is why it makes double what it costs, as opposed to the Meteor which makes half of what it costs.

      Build a useful service and they will come. You don't need to make it free. In fact, making it free is probably the worst possible thing you can do.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Way ahead of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't think of a good reason not to have free public transportation besides the classic line "But who's gonna pay for it?"...

      How about "Will this solve the problem I am trying to solve?"

      In case you hadn't noticed, pollution is not a problem we are trying to solve. For some values of "we".

      The southwestern and northeastern power brokers who control the US economy view pollution as a social good; they have overdosed on "Atlas Shrugged" and "The Tragedy of the Commons" respectively. Their goal is to destroy all natural commons and make clean air and water something that people have to pay them for. Surely you've noticed the stock market and hiring consequences of the recent US elections? Drill, baby, drill, and burn that coal even if we take a loss on digging it up.

      I'm not kidding. I had dinner with several billionaires and a half dozen multimillionaires last week. Still not kidding.

    6. Re:Way ahead of you by Rastl · · Score: 1

      One Parisian above claims that it takes an hour and a half to cross the city to get from one suburb to another, while it takes 20 minutes by car. That, to me, is a sign that there aren't enough buses filling in the gaps. Here in Martin County, Florida the "bus system" appears to be designed to turn tax money into jobs, rather than provide a useful service, with buses spaced an hour apart, taking an inordinate length of time to cross the county, only offered during daylight hours, and providing no effective county to county service. If they ran every ten minutes, with express buses linking to nearby county systems, I'd probably use it, because I hate driving.

      You're thinking of your specific situation. Now think about all the stops those buses serve while they're inconveniencing you. Public transportation runs where the public is. Unless you're a civil engineer with a specialty in public transportation logistics you can't know how they routed and scheduled the buses.

      I need to drive to the light rail station that takes me into downtown to my office. I would love to be able to step on a bus that takes me right to the station but there isn't one. Because they're needed to transport people in other places. I could take a bus if I wanted to add 45 minutes to my commute each way.

      Yes my commute is longer because I take light rail. I'm lucky I can take light rail. I don't have to deal with traffic, the downtown stop is katty corner from my office building, my company pays for my pass, and parking downtown would be a significant expense. So I'm trading time for money and personally I'm OK with the trade.

    7. Re:Way ahead of you by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Now think about all the stops those buses serve while they're inconveniencing you.

      Uh, none. No buses inconvenience me. What are you talking about? What do you think the quoted paragraph is trying to say?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:Way ahead of you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no single thing is going to solve the problem. It requires a combination of things, of which this is just one.

    9. Re:Way ahead of you by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      Plus it doesn't run in the snow and the buses they send to substitute for the trains are so few and so misdirected that people end up waiting hours in line to get where they're going.

    10. Re:Way ahead of you by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Here is an example of what goes wrong with bus and rail service in US cities. All bus and rail service is city-center centric -- so if you live in one suburb and work in another, you must travel to the center of the city , change (trains, say) and go out to another suburb. However, in terms of office parks they TEND to be built on the ring roads around the cities. But no one discusses running rail service on the ring road with a few 'spokes' going downtown. In other words, the planning for the tracks isn't necessarily where people live and work. (And I don't see the point of light rail as once you've put in tracks you can't change them whilst you can change a bus route by altering a bus schedule)

  20. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by EmeraldBot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What does that even mean? Forced to continue driving? Driving is one of the most expensive hobbies in the world, and if you can afford to drive you can afford the far cheaper option of public transportation and taxi's.

    ... The average American living in the suburbs is ~ 20-30 miles from the nearest city / shopping area. If you feel like you can make a 30 mile hike and back in less than a day, at the age of 85, you're welcome to it. But for many elderly people, who live alone, driving is not a luxury - it's a necessity, because there's often no other way for them to get basic needs. (medical care, food, etc.)

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
  21. Fake! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Pretty sure Reuters is one of those fake-news sites the liberals have been hyperventilating about recently, after all it disputes "fact" that he knows.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Fake! by fgouget · · Score: 2

      Pretty sure Reuters is one of those fake-news sites the liberals have been hyperventilating about recently, after all it disputes "fact" that he knows.

      Well if you had read the article you would have noticed the migrants got evacuated to the countryside a month ago. Furthermore in the pictures you would not have seen any trace of a wood fire because you would just not find any wood to burn in Paris. So no, migrants are not responsible for the wood fires that are in part responsible for the current pollution.

      Plus, wood fires have been blamed for pollution for many years and almost got banned two years ago. Are you going to blame the migrants for that too? Now like then the wood fires the article talks about are just lit by people in the chimney of their residential house just because it's nice to sit by the fire when it's cold. But of course don't let a mundane explanation get in the way of your paranoia.

    2. Re:Fake! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Well if you had read the article you would have noticed the migrants got evacuated to the countryside a month ago.

      Well if you had thought at all you would realize that's enough time for camps to re-form.

      Furthermore in the pictures you would not have seen any trace of a wood fire because you would just not find any wood to burn in Paris.

      I was in Paris this summer, when was the last time you were there?

      Never mind the wide abundance of trees everywhere, and in the winter so much dead foliage from which a camp could easily pull material to burn, you could keep a campfire going all night every night simply by burning trash people leave along the river pathways every evening. I imagine that's reduced in the winter but there are still a ton of trashcans everywhere you could raid for flammable material.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Fake! by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Furthermore in the pictures you would not have seen any trace of a wood fire because you would just not find any wood to burn in Paris.

      I was in Paris this summer, when was the last time you were there?

      Well, yesterday. And last Monday. And last week. And the week before that. But sure, as someone who has been there for a couple of days six months ago you must have some deep insight lacking to people who live here.

      Never mind the wide abundance of trees everywhere, and in the winter so much dead foliage

      Yeah, foliage that's been collected a couple of months ago. You know we have those pesky leaf blowers too.

      you could keep a campfire going all night every night simply by burning trash people leave along the river pathways every evening. I imagine that's reduced in the winter but there are still a ton of trashcans everywhere you could raid for flammable material.

      You should try that next time you're there. The police will be happy to help you save on hotel and food. Good riddance.

  22. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What does that even mean? Forced to continue driving? Driving is one of the most expensive hobbies in the world, and if you can afford to drive you can afford the far cheaper option of public transportation and taxi's.

    Hobby? Hobby? What do you think, we're talking about a bunch of poncy English Lords tooting around Silverstone in leather caps? We're not talking hobby, we're talking necessity. This is America, after all. If you don't drive 100 miles uphill(And hills in Illinois are especially treacherous) just to get your mail, you're not really American.

    It's also why we can't have high-speed internet. Or a decent beer. Or a White Christmas.

    And God forbid the cheeses. What the fuck is American cheese? Seriously.

  23. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... The average American living in the suburbs is ~ 20-30 miles from the nearest city / shopping area.

    Where the hell did you get that statistic from? If you're 20-30 miles from a mall you're no longer in the suburbs, you're considered to be rural.

  24. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and they sent an man who did nothing to prison. At least we still have all kids

  25. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Kergan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Eventually he got inmpeached and the new Gov discovered that free rides were not sustainable. So they means tested it.

    Dunno how they discovered it wasn't, but FWIW it might be an unfortunate (mis-)find.

    Public transportation where I live is free for seniors. Trains, metros, busses, boats, etc., in all cities and between all cities. Everything except airplanes. It surprised me somewhat when I came here for the first time, and it certainly surprised my parents when they first came (since as EU seniors they didn't need to pay either), but apparently this has been going on since the communist era.

    There arguably is a cost. Perhaps one can shrug it off as in "meh, the bus is scheduled anyway. The only point in time where it might be problematic is during rush hours when you need to field a few more busses." Or perhaps not.

    Either way, the positive side effects are observable when you care to look: seniors tend to visit their children and grand children across the country instead of it being the other way around like where I'm from - and more often, at that. You see seniors everywhere, and the contrast in their behavior is palpable when I compare this with the other two dozen or so countries I've lived in. When they do go out they can afford to go to cafes and restaurants, give some money to their kids and grand kids, etc. Plus nanny savings that allow single moms to work more than part-time where applicable.

    I've no idea if the net economic balance is positive, but when you factor in the quality of life side effects across generations it certainly seems worth doing.

  26. Volkswagen by Smiddi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are VW Diesel's still allowed on the road?

    1. Re:Volkswagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this moderated -1? It's factually correct and it's relevant.

  27. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf slashdot? insightful?

  28. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's only one way to freshen it...

  29. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    ...because the location of malls is the final arbiter of what is rural and what isn't.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  30. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's be clear

    Yes, let's. You are an ignorant moron. There, that was easy. Next!

  31. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    There arguably is a cost. Perhaps one can shrug it off as in "meh, the bus is scheduled anyway. The only point in time where it might be problematic is during rush hours when you need to field a few more busses." Or perhaps not.

    The set of people that would be paying for the service but now dont have to is the cost. This cost is pushed on to the tax payers, and the bulk of state and local tax dollars are surely paid by the middle class and the poor since Illinois has a single-rate income tax (a flat tax.)

    This progressive policy has a regressive consequence. Free rides should be given to the poorest people, not the oldest people.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  32. Banish cars from the city center by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Allow service vehicles, public transportation, cabs and bicycles, and everyone will be happy.
    This will be unpopular with North Americans (US and Canadians alike) who live their lives in cars, but in Europe we can conceive of an existence where you don't need to hop into a car every time you have to go from point A to point B.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Banish cars from the city center by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      Really?

      I have found some of the worst traffic congestion in European cities, and have found the public transport systems generally rather poor for anything other than either local or intercity transport (ie: almost completely ignoring medium distance needs).
      Of course I assume YOU live in a central apartment, work not far from there, and work in a job where you dont have to move much around, right? is that pretty much it? No one else should live differently to YOU?

      Well, I live on outside one side of a city which happens to form a geographical block (the city is at a choke point, unless you like boats), most of the work is on the other side of the city (great urban planning, and the council is actually working to make that WORSE by restricting residential and commercial mixing). From one side of the city to the other is around 90km, and buses (the only public transport that travels through) run regularly, every 2 HOURS from my area.

      Care to handwave your way to a solution there, genius?

    2. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better idea: banish companies from city centers and distribute them closer to where employees live.
      Better better idea: non-manufacturing companies must allow a minimum of 50% of their workforce to work from home at any given time.

    3. Re:Banish cars from the city center by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sure just put endless amounts of free parking easily accessible out side your city. Then make magical transporters to get everything larger than one grocery bag home, oh and don't forget those who travel outside a city but live in them, let them pack their cars with 20 trips of public transport.

    4. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell us the names of the cities you complain about.

      1) What the hell is your medium distance? Can't be the living districts/close by towns as they are usually connected by a local train service.
      2) People who have to use a vehicle in town (for work) are far better off if the rest uses public transport.
      3) Which European city has 90km from one side to the other and a 2 hour interval (and only busses?)?
      - London is about 50km from side to side, Paris, Munich and Hamburg are about 45km in diameter
      - Bus frequency ranges from 5 to 20 minutes, and there is an underground, local trains and express trains to cover more distance quickly
      - It takes about 30 to 45 minutes max to go from any one place to another by public transportation. If you don't switch lines it is another story.

    5. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a better idea: make mopeds obey the same emissions standards as cars and prohibit those that do not meet the new standards, maybe with a scrappage scheme to get them off the road completely. Also ban wood and oil based heating that does not have proper after treatment systems.

      Let's focus on fighting the main sources of pollution, not on symbolic gestures to annoy motorists.

    6. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Aliks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, and put lots of local stores around town so that you don't need to drive to some out-of-town megastore.

      Maybe even some cycle lanes so that people can get some exercise.

      Actually most UK cities do have endless free parking outside the city with a park and ride service to the centre.

      Socialism huh?

    7. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Oxygen99 · · Score: 1

      Europe would look exactly the same if its entire social geography had been designed with the motor vehicle in mind.

      --
      I had a dream, bright and carefree, but now there's doubt and gravity
    8. Re:Banish cars from the city center by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Please tell us the names of the cities you complain about."

      I'll do: Madrid. I live just in the border of "inner city", 32Km away from my job place. Going by car takes me slightly above an hour in rush hour, about 25 min without traffic. Using public transportation takes one hour and a half with two switches and it is almost inhuman in rush hour. But then, go to the supermarket. I did for a while, less than ten minutes by car, less than half an hour in public transportation -except for the little fact that they won't allow your bags in the public bus and just going with your shopping car through the subway entry is an odissey. Now, try to go to a suburban mall -i.e. when I was furnishing my new apartment, and cry.

      I used to live in a different -much shorter, town and I didn't even have a driving license (very uncommon, but still doable). Then I came to Madrid and while I don't use my car when I go to downtown, mainly for leisure, it became obvious to me that you just can't live in these kinds of big cities without a car (and, remember, I'm a rarity on this regard, wanting to live without a car if at all possible) since they are developed on the assumption that you have one, and I ended up taking my driving license at the age of 44, less than three years ago and buying a car. Not only I don't regret, but my overall transportation costs have cut in half (even while I'm still paying a loan for the car) not to mention the increase in my quality of life.

    9. Re:Banish cars from the city center by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Then make magical transporters

      They're called "delivery vans". It's kind of like magic: you go to your magical blinkenlight box and wiggle the wiggly thing and press the buttons. Then at the designated time, a van arrives with your stuff in JUST LIKE MAGIC!!!

      to get everything larger than one grocery bag home

      Are you really so weedy that you can't carry more than one grocery bag?

      Or you know, get one of those wheelie shopping baskets. I mean they used to be the exclusive preserve of little old ladies with headscarves (the actual scarf thing, not the religious item), but purely because everyone else thought themselves too cool to use one.

      Now they seem popular with young men in Brixton. Oh my days!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Berlin is a big city where practically nobody has a car (except the rich newcomers). It works.

    11. Re:Banish cars from the city center by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Europe would look exactly the same if its entire social geography had been designed with the motor vehicle in mind.

      I don't disagree.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    12. Re:Banish cars from the city center by blind+biker · · Score: 0

      Sure just put endless amounts of free parking easily accessible out side your city. Then make magical transporters to get everything larger than one grocery bag home, oh and don't forget those who travel outside a city but live in them, let them pack their cars with 20 trips of public transport.

      As I said, in Europe we can conceive of an existence where you don't need to hop into a car every time you have to go from point A to point B. You, obviously, can't. It's remarkable to see your mental block at work, and I hope you answer this post as well.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    13. Re:Banish cars from the city center by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Allow service vehicles, public transportation, cabs and bicycles, and everyone will be happy.

      Okay, sure. Just as soon as I figure out how to get my SUV registered as a "service vehicle"...

      Don't even try to tell me it won't happen... There's widespread fraud just in handicapped placards, because parking a few feet away is too much hassle for some people. You think the ultra-wealthy will resign themselves to riding the bus with the peasants? Not a chance, they'll find any means to maintain their status, privilege and convenience.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:Banish cars from the city center by shilly · · Score: 1

      You said 90km from one side of Madrid to the other. 90km takes you from Meco to Valmojado. In no conceivable world would those little villages be considered part of Madrid. You said you have a 30km commute from the border of the inner city to your place of work. That's like Alcobendas to Buenavista -- a massive journey. I really strongly doubt that is a typical commuter journey for 90%+ of Madrilenos.

      There are tens of millions of urban residents of European cities who live in houses in the outer city who commute in to work by public transport daily without any of the issues you describe. I personally commute from NW London to the centre of town daily. It takes 40mins door to door on the tube.

    15. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe just put all selfish morons like you in the city center and let everyone else not live in the god damn city center.

    16. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at no point was 90km mentioned, try reading

    17. Re:Banish cars from the city center by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Europe would look exactly the same if its entire social geography had been designed with the motor vehicle in mind.

      Of course it would not. Roadways in cities would be wider, at a minimum.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Banish cars from the city center by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If everyone uses the wheelie shopping baskets, then bus occupancy is going to have to drop to accommodate them. I agree that those are still silly arguments if you live in the city, you can just have things delivered. But what happens when you leave the city? Auto rental fees are still abusive. It cost me fifty bucks to use a U-Haul pickup for firewood for a couple of hours. It doesn't take many of those to pay off a little old Japanese pickup.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Banish cars from the city center by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      I used to walk half way across Reading, in the UK, from Sainsburys in the city center to my flat, carrying four or more bags of groceries. Older people had little carts, resembling carry on bags (the type with a slide out handle and two wheels) you'd see in an airport, to do the job.

      And in the event I really had too much weight in those bags to contemplate walking that distance, I'd take a bus.

      Why would you think you'd need a magical transportation device for more than one grocery bag?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    20. Re:Banish cars from the city center by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      But what happens when you leave the city?

      But the whole article is about reducing car traffic in cities to reduce the smog. It makes more sense to have a car if you live in a more rural location and smog isn't a problem.

      Plus also, you have to be really pretty rural before you can't get things delieved.

      Auto rental fees are still abusive. It cost me fifty bucks to use a U-Haul pickup for firewood for a couple of hours.

      Well, yes the per-journey incrementalcost is much higher for a rental. But I don't own a car currently. Even with the rentals, I spend much, much less per year than I would on maintainance, insurance, road tax etc. And, I can also rent an appropriate vehicle for the journey, like a nice long wheelbase transit if I'm moving big things or a normal car for simply getting me somewhere.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    21. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are one sad stupid little man. Your environment and experience reflect the tiniest part of reality, go learn something new.

    22. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer to hop in my F-150 Crew Cab. It's like traveling in my living room. American's live far better than you Eurotrash.

    23. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      in Europe we can conceive of an existence where you don't need to hop into a car every time you have to go from point A to point B.

      Please come to Minneapolis (Minnesota) and try walking 3 miles to the Park & Ride to get on the bus, 1.5 miles to your workplace off the bus, then the reverse in -30C weather with -60C to -70C windchill a couple of times and tell me how you don't need to hop in a car on those days.

      Sure, it's possible for a fit person with the right gear. It's pretty uncomfortable, however, and somewhat dangerous regardless, and extremely dangerous for the elderly/infirm.

    24. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On some buses you aren't allowed to carry your weeks worth of groceries on the bus with you.

    25. Re:Banish cars from the city center by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Plus also, you have to be really pretty rural before you can't get things delieved.

      You don't have to be very far before it becomes much more expensive, though. Since I live in a crappy little county with a crappy little retail store selection, I can only have most large things shipped to a freight depot. Some people will ship them to the foot of my driveway, but they can't get a big truck up it.

      This is not about me, though, this is about the city. And if you seldom leave it, and you happen to live where you can walk to work or where public transportation works for you then yes, it surely makes sense to have no car. In a lot of cities, it's not reasonable to relocate to be closer to work — finding any housing at all is often an epic struggle. So we're going to need either to fix that problem, or to build public transportation systems which actually let people go where they need to go in a timely fashion. For example, it has to be faster than walking. Certainly in San Francisco that is often not the case, depending on which boroughs you're traveling between.

      Even with the rentals, I spend much, much less per year than I would on maintainance, insurance, road tax etc.

      In the USA we pay the same road tax regardless of whether we own the vehicle. Our registration fees only pay for... well, they don't apparently pay for much of anything actually. But that's another rant. EVs will cut maintenance costs. Insurance is based on the number of miles driven.

      And, I can also rent an appropriate vehicle for the journey, like a nice long wheelbase transit if I'm moving big things or a normal car for simply getting me somewhere.

      If you're commonly making trips which can be made in a total econobox then that can be viable. If you are commonly making trips which require a larger vehicle, that becomes prohibitively expensive in fairly short order. I, for one, am two meters tall, and I always require a larger vehicle. Only a very few mid-size vehicles are even large enough inside to accommodate me. Nissan and Subaru are the only Japanese manufacturers which leave enough space for a human of my dimensions, for example, in anything other than the largest vehicles from a luxury sub-marque. In Panama I was able to rent an Almera (Sentra) at one point and that was not great but okay, but then I got stuck with a Yaris later and it was a knee-cramping nightmare.

      There are lots of considerations which might lead people to need to own a car even if they live in a city. Most of them could be eliminated by implementing elevated PRT, for those people who tend to stay within its borders.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the GP was saying "Europe would look exactly the same [as the U.S.] if its ..."

      It looks like you understood it as "Europe would look exactly the same [as Europe currently looks] if its..."

    27. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From one side of the city to the other is around 90km, and buses (the only public transport that travels through) run regularly, every 2 HOURS from my area.

      It's right there, in the GGGP.

    28. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet they voluntarily drive in crappy cars like yours.

    29. Re:Banish cars from the city center by PmanAce · · Score: 1

      Simple solution. Move or change cities.

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    30. Re:Banish cars from the city center by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're almost certainly correct. Hmm, is it that time already?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Banish cars from the city center by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They're called "delivery vans".

      The old "Let everyone pay extra for someone to haul around something in a vehicle with even worse emissions than those being banned trick.

      Are you really so weedy that you can't carry more than one grocery bag?

      Me? No. I'm built as. But I also don't have my head up my arse and I know people outside my gym.

      Or you know, get one of those wheelie shopping baskets.

      Oh I get it now. You don't have a family, or enough friends to host a party. You have no need for more than a baguette and a stale cigarette to keep you nourished. In the mean time how about you actually go and have a look at what people buy to get them through a day or two. It may blow your mind.

    32. Re:Banish cars from the city center by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I live in the least car friendly city in Europe, a city where I would get fined if I drive from one side to the other. Yet I still need to own a car.

      Not needing a car on a daily basis is quite different from a blanket ban of cars in a city, which is just out right stupid. But I see you have put as much thought into your post as the GP.

    33. Re:Banish cars from the city center by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I live in the least car friendly city in Europe, a city where I would get fined if I drive from one side to the other. Yet I still need to own a car.

      Not needing a car on a daily basis is quite different from a blanket ban of cars in a city, which is just out right stupid. But I see you have put as much thought into your post as the GP.

      In spite of what you seem to think, the trend in many cities is to reduce and gradually remove cars from the inner city.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    34. Re:Banish cars from the city center by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The old "Let everyone pay extra

      Contrary to popular belief, car journeys are not free.

      for someone to haul around something in a vehicle with even worse emissions than those being banned trick.

      You haven't thought this through. One van has worse emissions than one car. But one van carries many loads of shopping. I believe that they supermarket delivery vans carry something like 10 loads. A van is not 10 times worse than a car, which means it's a net win for the van.

      Me? No. I'm built as. But I also don't have my head up my arse and I know people outside my gym.

      You really do: you're dismissing as an impossibility something I and literally millions of others do in just my home city every single day. I also am not a total weed to the point where I can't carry a couple of bags---something I see even tiny little old grannies doing. Not having a gym, I don't know any of those grannies from my gym. But given you seem to be less physically able than them, I would recommend you find another gym with great urgency, because your gym is not working very well for you.

      Oh I get it now. You don't have a family, or enough friends to host a party.

      Have you *already* forgotten about the delivery vans? They can deliver a lot of stuff.

      You have no need for more than a baguette

      I make my own bread, as it happens, and almost always wholemeal.

      and a stale cigarette to keep you nourished.

      Never bought a pack of fags, I only roll my own. Or perhaps I go for a pipe. I think pipes have a certain timeless style.

      In the mean time how about you actually go and have a look at what people buy to get them through a day or two. It may blow your mind.

      I like how you're telling me that my life and the life I live like millions of others is impossible, and when I find out its impossible, it will blow my mind. Given that I have been happily living it for years and know people from singletons to families living it too, I strongly suspect that yet another trip to the super market is not going to reveal the impossibility of it.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    35. Re:Banish cars from the city center by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Some people will ship them to the foot of my driveway,

      OK, once you can speak in those terms about where you live, you're definitely living somewhere it makes sense to have a car..

      This is not about me, though, this is about the city. And if you seldom leave it, and you happen to live where you can walk to work or where public transportation works for you then yes, it surely makes sense to have no car

      In European cities, very many places are with reach of public transportation. For slightly more spread out bits, people often drive to near the train station, then take the train.

      If you are commonly making trips which require a larger vehicle, that becomes prohibitively expensive in fairly short order.

      Yeah, OK. That's going to change the costs a lot. I'm a normal height (slightly under 6 foot), so I fit into normal cars comfortably, so I can rent the cheapest.

      There are lots of considerations which might lead people to need to own a car even if they live in a city

      Oh sure. There's plenty of reasons to own one, but it's not essentially mandatory like it is if you don't live in a city. When I didn't live in a city, I owned a car. I do however like coming on these threads to have people tell me my life is essentially impossible and I can't be living it because I don't have a car.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    36. Re:Banish cars from the city center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people that exercise in the middle of pollution and traffic from heavier vehicles are a crossover between retarded and insane, like, idk, intarded or something

    37. Re:Banish cars from the city center by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Really? I do not live in Britain but found it a bit shocking that I had to pay 20p to park for 30 minutes...at a suburban Sainsbury store. When I got as far north as Lincoln that was not true but south of there...yeah. Now I don't have an exhaustive list of places obviously, but..

    38. Re:Banish cars from the city center by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "You said 90km from one side of Madrid to the other."

      No, I didn't. While there are 150Km from, say, San Martin de Valdeiglesias to Buitrago de Lozoya, my bet is that a vast majority of commutes fall within the 50 Km limit being modal somewhere between 20~30Km.

      "You said you have a 30km commute from the border of the inner city to your place of work. That's like Alcobendas to Buenavista -- a massive journey"

      In what world is Alcobendas or Buenavista "the inner city"? The inner city is what falls within the M30 limits. In my case my daily commute is between Vicente Calderon Stadium sorroundings to Tres Cantos. And no: it isn't a "massive journey" but quite a standard one -be my guest the hideous traffic jams at rush hour I stand every-single-damn-day, both at M30 and M40: be it a rarity and, by the very definition, there wouldn't be such jams.

      "I really strongly doubt that is a typical commuter journey for 90%+ of Madrilenos."

      Where do the traffic jams come from but from those very lots of "Madrilenos" making more or less the same journey I'm doing? Going from the cheaper residential South of Madrid (say, Getafe, Parla, Pinto...) to the business centers on the North (say, Boadilla, Tres Cantos, Las Rozas, SS de los Reyes...) is nothing but standard.

      And then, more on the anecdotal side, I must be quite unlucky on your account because it's been more or less the same in all the other jobs I've had before: from Vicente Calderon to Parla (the shortest), to Las Rozas, to Las Tablas... Even the one where it certainly made more sense going by tube, a time I was working at Cuatro Caminos, well within the inner city, it still took me 45~50 min door to door.

  33. for perspective.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ..Beijing was at 286 last week for the pm10 reading.

  34. Re: IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Older drives are more expensive on the roads, incentives to reduce their driving saves money and benefits the public.

    Of course, they could also just bus all the elderly to Arizona and Florida, as nearby Governor Pence of Indiana suggested. This would have a multitude of benefits, especially for production of NEW! Soylent Avocado.

  35. Re: domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a faggot. Hope that helps.

  36. Re: IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Agreed that the poorest benefit the most. However, encouraging the elderly to stay fit and active using the incentive of low cost-travel could extend lives and reduce medical expenses.

  37. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    that's a suburb, if it's just 20-30 miles.

    you know what's rural? driving 100km both ways just to buy booze.
    that's Lapland for you.

    anyways, for a lot of elderly people the choice is to either keep driving or move into an old peoples cesspit. free public transportation doesn't really come to the play even, if the bus is 10 km away.

    what's a mall anyways? and look, I lived in a 23 000 people about city in Finland and having a car was pretty much non-optional even if you lived 2km from the "mall"(highschool, shops, restaurants area). the local bus went maybe two times a day and just walking to it would have been half the distance anyways - and yeah I did walk many, many times to school in -20-30C and biked in -10C.

    When I lived in Helsinki however the public transportation was pretty good, albeit expensive all things considered. like 1.5 liters of gasoline for a 3 minute metro ride kind of expensive. if it wasn't snowy half the year I bet nearly everyone would have some kind of a moped or scooter, like people in asia do.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  38. Why? It's a waste! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in a major US city and I take a bus to my job (typical 9am-5pm hours) and I think at least 75% of the time there's no more than 4 people on the bus including the bus driver. What a waste! I've had the entire bus to myself many times.

    1. Re:Why? It's a waste! by shilly · · Score: 2

      Newsflash: major US cities aren't the same as Paris, and load factors on buses are a shit ton higher there than where you reside.

  39. Re: domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he was right and you want to frame him as an "other" by labeling him and dismissing what you know to be actually happening. You even posted two links about burning wood being a problem and a ban.

    What's the angle that makes you full of hate?

  40. Great System by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    Authorities have said only drivers with odd-numbered registration plates can drive in the capital region on Wednesday. ....

    Great System. Rich self entitled bastards with multiple cars get to drive whenever they want, working stiffs trying to get to their jobs have another burden. Also, if people have multiple vehicles and one is a small relatively clean and efficient vehicle and the other is a large dirty low mileage vehicle, this law tells them to drive the dirty inefficient vehicle some of the time.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Great System by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That system's in use all over the world.

      The administrative burden of JUST ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE is far too high and would actually cost you more.

      On Thursdays (I think), you can't drive a truck through Italy. Same thing.

      As soon as you get into registered lists, issuing stickers or permits, etc. it gets so expensive that you don't want to do it.

      You can do it fairly, cheaply, or easily enforceable. Pick any two.

    2. Re:Great System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rich get richer and the poor get poorer, nothing new there.

      Who set up the rules? The rich you say?

    3. Re:Great System by jandersen · · Score: 1

      As soon as you get into registered lists, issuing stickers or permits, etc. it gets so expensive that you don't want to do it.

      Not necessarily - ANPR is a new word I've started seeing on signs in and around London: Automatic Number Plate Recognition. It is used for many things: police cars can identify the owner of a car in front of them and see if they paid road tax, have a valid insurance etc, Transport for London can see who enters the Congestion Charge Zone, and there is this new thing called Average Speed Check - and so on. If it works for these purposes, how hard would it be to use it to check whether people are allowed to use their cars on certain days? Very easy, is the answer, in terms of technology. The hard bit is the legislation and deciding on how to administrate and implement it; because you don't want to cobble a system together and then have to change it over and over, or go through Parliament several times.

      Personally, I think we should be quite heavihanded about this - require that a family can only buy a car if they can prove they have a secure, legal place to park it (that would sort a lot of the problems in Beijing, where they tend to park in several layers - illegally - every night). Or require that people can justify a real need to own a car, like being unable to use public transport for serious, medical reasons. And then provide good, public transport and good facilities for bicycles; if you have less than 5 - 10 miles to work, then a bike is perfectly suited, and you shouldn't need a car.

    4. Re:Great System by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      This is for two days. It's not likely even the ultra rich are going to buy a new Mercedes specifically to bypass this rule when the maximum in fines they'll suffer will be EUR35. Not unless Europe has seen some significant deflation lately and EUR34 is the cost of a brand new Mercedes.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Great System by fgouget · · Score: 1

      The administrative burden of JUST ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE is far too high and would actually cost you more.

      And yet next year it's supposed to get replaced with which is an environmental badge that one will have to have on the windshield to get into Paris on days such as these. Cars will get a different color badge based on the environmental standards they implement. The color coding will make it easy for the police to spot cars that are not allowed and to stop + fine them.

  41. Re:domestic wood fires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >(Who are not 'burning shit' in paris).

    This is what brainwashing looks like. Incredible.

  42. Re: domestic wood fires by prefec2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is totally fake bullshit. For starters there are not that many refugees in Paris. And they have houses in Paris. The largest sum in the EU is residing in Germany. And they have houses too. Most domestic fires are fireplaces which middle class families have for fun.

  43. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just used the words 'cheaper' and 'taxi' in the same sentence. Are you sure you are alright?

  44. I am still baffled as to why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't France have stringent polution controls on their cars? (Euro IV, Euro V) WHY, then, is there smog? Is this the consequence of having lots of diesels, but weak controls on nitrous oxides, unlike the USA?

    1. Re:I am still baffled as to why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smog is caused by particulates, not by nitrous oxides. Only a relatively small fraction of particulates is due to cars and with modern cars, most of it does not come out of the tailpipe, but from the tyres, the road surface and, to a lesser extent, the brakes.

      Paris has a few problems that lead to smog formation. One is that scooters are used quite extensively and for reasons I cannot fathom they are subject to much weaker emissions standards than cars, which are also not enforced in practice. A single scooter can produce as much particulates as dozens or hundreds of modern cars. Another is that it has become fashionable in recent years to heat houses by with wood stoves, because that is cheap and renewable. However, it produces enormous levels of pollution, especially in poorly constructed and/or maintained installations. This combined with a high population density and lots of particulates from natural sources can cause smog during extended periods with little wind and high ozone levels.

      It would not be difficult to enact policies that reduce the actual sources of the problem. Unfortunately, that would be nowhere near as popular as symbolic anti-car measures with the electorate of the current administration in Paris and ultimately, politicians are more interested in what gets them reelected than in what works to solve problems.

  45. Half ass collection schemes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bleh, our city just has a cop randomly check for tickets. I guess they can just give out big fines for not having a ticket.

  46. I'm in Paris right now. by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    And the pollution isn't that bad at all. It's on par with Boston in the winter. It's nice that I don't have to pay to ride the subway, but this reporting and reaction is hyperbole.

    1. Re:I'm in Paris right now. by necro81 · · Score: 2

      And the pollution isn't that bad at all

      It's already working, then!

  47. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by turbidostato · · Score: 1

    "if you can afford to drive you can afford the far cheaper option of public transportation and taxi's."

    Have you done the numbers? Really? Because I've done and no: taxis are not cheaper than cars, not by a far margin like somewhere from 300% to 1000% more expensive. Other means, yes, can be cheaper... usually if you don't value your time. And while car pollution can shorten your life, so also do sleep deprivation from having to wake up one to one hour and a half earlier to go to workplace on public transport.

  48. Our invasion is successful again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ja, mein Fuhrer!
    French are choking to death by our Volkswagens!

    1. Re:Our invasion is successful again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The French brands produce much more emissions than Volkswagens...

  49. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by mvdwege · · Score: 1

    The obvious solution is of course to address the regressive part of the problem and abolish the flat tax.

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  50. Why not ban combustion engines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least until pollution levels go back. Make an exception for public transport, taxis, disabled people and true emergencies. These half-assed attempts will have no effect whatsoever. And a 35 € fine is a joke. How can car ownership Trump public health? Fucking idiots.

    1. Re:Why not ban combustion engines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of findiing a good solution, your primitive brains just want to selfishly ban shit. I bet that took a lot of thought from you.

  51. Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fake news. They didn't make it free, they simply stopped charging riders fares and instead are using everyone's taxes whether you ride or not.

    1. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really consider this to be fake news in the same sense that "HRC runs a paedo chain out of the back of a pizza restaurant" is fake news, you are probably odds-on the person with the biggest difference between your evaluation of your intelligence and the actual truth.

    2. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about Pizzagate? This article blatantly misrepresents the truth: public transportation costs just as much as it ever did, possibly less the overhead from collecting fares from passengers. Attacking the messenger is the way of your Democrat kind. America saw through it a month ago and told the crooked old hag to take a hike. Get over it.

      Independent.co.uk = fake news, pending a retraction of this very misleading story.

    3. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you always complain like that when someone offers you a "free" beer or something?
      Also, I don't think they use horses for public transport, so what fake news are you making up talking about "riders"?!

    4. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were being taxed to pay for everybody else's "free" beer then, yes, I'd complain. Loudly. Wow you are stupid.

    5. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you paying taxes in Paris? Because otherwise you aren't being taxed at all for this, so the headline even by your criteria would be entirely correct.
      And if you complain about SOMEONE still paying for it, that's exactly the same as for the free beer.
      (not to mention that you were most likely taxed for the road and many other things that were used to get that "free" beer to you)
      I'd suggest you stop trying to re-define words to mean something they don't., it's just annoying to everyone else who understand everyday expressions and doesn't think every single word needs to come with a footnote because of people like you who are on some kind of "liberal" "political correctness" crusade.

    6. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fascists are attempting to dilute the meaning of "fake news" so they can continue to promote hoaxes like the pizza restaurant thing to keep their base rabid.

  52. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

    While you are correct that you couldn't economically use taxis to replace all you driving, in some circumstances the mixture of walking, cycling, public transport and taxis/Uber can be cheaper than owning and operating a car. It depends on how much you travel and where you need to go. I also did the sums and decided to not replace my car when it gave up the ghost. I found that it was cheaper for me to use the other transport options.

    Whenever I have moved to a new home, I have always chosen a location that is close to a major public transport hub and either walking or cycling distance to university and work. For those rare occasions when I have to go somewhere that is not easily serviced by trains or buses, I get a taxi. Doing this is still cheaper for me than buying, maintaining, fueling, insuring and parking a car. I am also able to spend my commuting time working, surfing the web, or even playing video games. It's nice if you can get it to work for you.

  53. The REAL reason for this change..?? by geekmux · · Score: 0

    "Authorities have said only drivers with odd-numbered registration plates can drive in the capital region on Wednesday. Drivers of even-numbered cars were given the same opportunity on Tuesday, but could now be fined up to 35 EUR if they are caught behind the wheel. More than 1,700 motorists were fined for violations on Tuesday...

    Well, this is certainly one creative way to throw a blanket of fog over the fact that you now have a new revenue stream.

    Congratulations on opening up another channel of greed and corruption.

  54. Quit taxing EVs by WindBourne · · Score: 0

    Seriously, it is much cheaper to quit taxing EVs than subsidizing public transportation.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Quit taxing EVs by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Your proposal is to not tax rich people driving status symbols while not subsidizing public transport?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Quit taxing EVs by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Really? Only rich ppl drive cars?
      Last time I was in Europe, I saw PLENTY of regular ppl driving cars.
      However, unless you get those ICE off the road, nothing will change. And making public transportation free will NOT change things. The reason why they are not taken is that they are no convenient and were poorly designed.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Quit taxing EVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many countries, EVs are not taxed and/or subsidised. Yet in none of those countries the percentage of people using EVs comes anywhere close to the percentage of people who use public transport.

    4. Re:Quit taxing EVs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your proposal was to stop taxing EVs (i.e., status symbols), not cars in general.

    5. Re: Quit taxing EVs by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Status symbol? They are having massive pollution problems and EVs are none polluting.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  55. Nobody wants to use public transportation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They keep trying to force people into cans like sardines. This is the 21st century! Let's talk about NO commuting. Our office works one day per week from home. That's a 20% reduction in dry cleaning, fuel, etc. I also typically get more done because I don't have people wandering by my desk with time on their hands.

  56. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that they're not really being bought, are they? The buses have to go places whether or not anyone is riding. People whose senses are gradually failing should not be driving. Even if you're so delusional as to equate taxation with theft, the theft was the public transportation, not the discounted fare. But hey, never settle for critical thinking when there's fear and hatred to be relied on.

  57. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My home city has a map of how much you save by going by bus instead of by car, and they compared it to buying the cheapest, one-year ticket.
    If you were from any of the neighboring villages, going by bus was the more expensive option even by their calculation.
    Where I live now, if you already own a car, going by bus is about 3x more expensive and 7x slower. Enough that owning a car just to drive to work would probably break even.
    Well, except that going by bike is still 3x faster than bus and even cheaper, can earn back the price of a cheap bike in half a year.
    I like public transport in principle, but in so many cases it's completely broken even in Europe that my best hopes for it are when they can make self-driving busses on the cheap and cut the price by at least 5x, otherwise it'll continue to be limited to inner cities and exceptional cases.

  58. Only 1700 ? by Kopp · · Score: 1

    Well, they didn't put a lot of effort to find those not applying the restriction. You can stop at any red light and find dozens of cars with the wrong category of number in a few minutes. Apparently, they had 120 checkup points ... not really efficient. Unless those check up points were actually at the outskirt and only prevented people from going in, not fining. Still, if they wanted to make money witht that, it'll be quite easy to get more than that.

  59. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by dywolf · · Score: 1

    a) the poorest people and the oldest people are often the same people. there is significant overlap
    b) the bus/train is going to run anyway. the difference between an empty seat and an unpaying seat is zero. there is no net increase in cost to taxpayers.
    c) drivers past a certain age are a liability on the roads. keeping them off the roads is a boon to taxpayers.
    d) therefore, given A B and C, seniors who are able to still be out and about and not just shut in their homes or a nursing facility are a boon to the local economy, whether they are working or consuming. it also keeps them more active and engaged and improves their quality of life.

    Conclusion: there are no regressive consequences here.

    Free rides should be given to the poorest people, as well as the oldest people

    FTFY

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  60. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    The onetime costs are low for driving, but that is actually a downside, as most of the costs come in single lump sums. You either buy a $200 junker every other month, and get caught in the middle of nowhere a few times a year and need to use a taxi or you pay $15 grand every 10 years. Then lets say you are OK with driving illegally, and don't get insurance. Sure, if you drive an average of 4 hours or more every day, and break the law, and plan on going to jail and being bankrupt for the rest of your life if you get in an accident, maybe owning a car is cheaper. But if you just need to get into town a few times a year, taxis are cheaper. You can take quite a few rides in taxis for $1000, and you will never end up spending less than that on average a year owning a car.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  61. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and yeah I did walk many, many times to school in -20-30C and biked in -10C.

    Yeah, I did this in Minnesota, too, but it still isn't any fun. I don't begrudge people their transportation choices when it gets below 0C for that reason.

  62. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whenever I have moved to a new home, I have always chosen a location that is close to a major public transport hub and either walking or cycling distance to university and work.

    Not everyone gets to make that choice. The best you can probably do with an ideal infrastructure is a spanning-H tree (a la the core clock distribution systems on microprocessors) and that still only scales as O(n) or O(n log n) at best, but the areal density scales as O(n^2). Just from a geometry standpoint *some* people are going to have to drive if everyone wants to live in or near a metropolis.

  63. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by JackieBrown · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the new Gov discovered that free rides were not sustainable.

    Dunno how they discovered it wasn't, but FWIW it might be an unfortunate (mis-)find

    I know! It's too bad the greedy bus driver don't drive seniors and poor people for no paycheck. I guess bus drivers really don't care about the poor and the seniors. To be clear, these bus drivers should also be paying for the gas and maintenance.

  64. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for the TANSTAAFL. You'd added a lot to the conversation.

  65. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by ghoul · · Score: 1

    This is a benefit which would help Native born more than Immigrants as Immigrant grandparents are probably overseas.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  66. I visited Paris in the mid 1980s by tgibson · · Score: 1

    I remember riding one of the buses. True story.

  67. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Here in San Francisco Public Transport Drivers are some of the most overpaid people. They get better pay than Software Engineers with 4 years of college and have fantastic pension schemes. I was talking to one of the drivers of our corporate Shuttle. he drove for VTA for 20 years and now has a pension for life. He can live on the pension but he is bored so he drives for our company's corporate shuttle. What he made as a driver was way more than what Software engineers make in the first 5 years of their career

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  68. Saas-Fee by Max_W · · Score: 2

    I was recently in the town of Saas-Fee in the canton of Valais in Sitzerland: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    All fossil fuel vehicles are banned from this town. There is a special underground garage to park cars outside.

    People, the life in 19th century was better than now. Clean air, quiet splendid streets without grey rubber dust from the cars' tires, nice houses, all districts of the town are equally prestigious, as all of them are clean and calm, without steel rivers of cars and clouds of toxic smoke.

  69. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Don't even look at the pay extorted by the port of Oakland longshoremen. They get paid more than senior developer/project leads.

    You have to inherit the job from a family member though.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  70. Live news from Paris : 4th in a row ! by mind_of_delusion · · Score: 2

    It's the fourth day the alternate traffic circulation rule is applied (and the first in Lyon [where the public tranportation company is on strike ...] and Villeurbanne). Since I've right now a nice view on La Defense from my desk, I can say that the fog is lighter than previous days, but still here.

    I're red some wrong statments, and here's some clarifications :
    - the monthly transportation fee is 73€ for everyone, with no travel limit adn all transportation medium in "Ile de France" (quite a large area, take a look in Google :))
    - the bus network (RATP inside Paris, other companies, like Transdev, outside) is pretty dense : look on Google map on Paris, and zoom enough to see the little blue buses, you'll see :) There's actually 353 buses lines in Paris and the nearest suburbs.
    - there's a metro each 2 or 3 minutes, if all works well (but because of the terrorist threat, every abandonned luggage tend to cause delays)
    - the RER, who permit me to go to work (I live near Fontainebleau and work near La Defense, and out of the holyday season, I can't even imagine to go to work by car [count about 2-3 hours x2]), is ... let's say, almost reliable. At rush hour, we have 1 train every 15 minutes, and after that, one each 1/2 hour or each hour (depend of the station and the RER line).

    Mmmm ... that's it, I think I haven't forgot anything ... all the other things is true (the smell, especiallly during summer, the crowd, the way the disease could be catch in the metro ...) ... Ah, one more thing : the chimney using is tolerated for supplementary heating or for your own pleasure (see https://www.service-public.fr/... [french page]), and the studies who says that this wood bunring polution represent 23% of the pollution are very controversed.

  71. Re:IL had free rides to all senior citizens 2008-2 by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    ... The average American living in the suburbs is ~ 20-30 miles from the nearest city / shopping area.

    If this is true (which I doubt. 20-30 MILES on average from the NEAREST place for shopping??? Extremely implausible.) then America needs to do some serious re-modelling of it's cities to make them more inhabitant-friendly. Living in a small (10,000 people) city in a rural area, I have two supermarkets and a full-service pharmacy within under a mile, a late night (07:00-22:00 x7 x365) store in the same range. Another 7 miles (I cycle it routinely) I add 3 more general supermarkets, a town with three computer-bits stores and several furniture and clothing shops. 30 miles out, there's a cinema but I've never felt the need to travel there. (Maybe even two cinemas ; it's not on my "need to know" list.)

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"