Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Wants To Enable Cellular PCs, But Will Carriers Bite? (computerworld.com)

Microsoft is aiming to enable the installation of non-removable programmable SIM cards and data radios in PCs and Windows tablets. In the company's vision, users will then be able to purchase cellular data for those cards through the Windows Store. The announcement was made at the company's WinHEC conference for device manufacturers in Shenzhen, China. From a report on ComputerWorld: Users would also get settings to help them better manage the use of data plans, so it's easier for them to control how much data apps can suck up. But there's a wrinkle in that plan: Cellular carriers will have to get on board with selling plans through the Windows Store, which will likely be a tougher sell.

87 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Zanadou · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong???

    1. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Enigma2175 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What could possibly go wrong???

      A better question is "Why does Microsoft need to be involved in this?" I can currently buy a data card from one of the cell carriers or I can tether my computer to my phone. How is having to pay Microsoft going to improve the current state of things? Just make the OS, jackasses, stop trying to use your near monopoly to force your way into other industries -- you are really bad at it.

      --

      Enigma

    2. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How this is improving things? Easy, where is the cut for MS in the current scenario?

      Oh, how is it improving things for you, you mean? Not at all, why would it? Why should MS give a shit about that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't buy this for a moment. Microsoft "telemetry" is several gigabytes per month. No existing data plan could cope.

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      They will get yet another vector to track you by.

      Meanwhile malware writers will also figure out yet another attack vector that they can apply.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by tepples · · Score: 1

      I can currently buy a data card from one of the cell carriers

      An external device sticks out the side of your laptop, making it something extra to lose or break. It also occupies one of the few USB ports.

      or I can tether my computer to my phone.

      For another thing, that requires already owning a smartphone and subscribing to a data plan. For another, only very recently have U.S. carriers begun to treat mobile hotspot use as a standard feature of cellular data plans. Previously, it was considered a breach and thus grounds for disconnection, causing the early termination fee to become due and payable immediately and the carrier to refuse to do further business with that subscriber.

    6. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      The idea is so absurd that it even looks like one of those plans the CIA has in espionage movies to dominate the world.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    7. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who do you hate dealing with more, Microsoft or your cellular carrier?

    8. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Is there an all-of-the-above option?

    9. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I imagine they would have to make larger data plans available for cheaper though I doubt that will happen.

    10. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Is that a new systemd feature?

    11. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Microsoft wants to sell it directly and have the cards installed by default is so they can have them connected and activated even if you have not activated them and signed up for a plan. This way, the PCs and tablets would report back to them no matter what and they'd have your GPS data on top of it as well as audio recordings if you don't have Cortana blocked. You just wouldn't get to use the already active connections. Now, like the summery said, getting the carriers to agree to this will be quite a challenge. They'll want a lot more money from Microsoft then they are likely to be willing to pay. Popcorn time.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    12. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      There is already a setting for metered connection which drastically reduces the amount of traffic. I'd imagine that function would be invoked when on a data capped connection. I'm still unwilling to buy my data plan through the M$ store, especially when I already have one connected to my existing phone. It is just plain retarded that the US doesn't allows phones to be locked to a particular carrier. Somehow no matter what the industry and the FCC tout it doesn't seem to be in the users' interest in any way shape or form...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    13. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by youngone · · Score: 1

      I'm not sold on "non-removeable" though

      Neither will the cell carriers be.

      There are lots of cell phone markets with very limited competition, and the incumbents like it fine that way. The last thing they're going to agree to is Microsoft trying to muscle in.

      This won't be a winner for Microsoft.

    14. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Almost all laptops have internal mini PCIe or M.2 slots.

      How many of them? What are you willing to remove to add a cellular card?

    15. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) Just about any laptop with a wifi card (ie. almost all of them)
      2) Nothing, because you can get a WLAN/WWAN card

    16. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Are a substantial fraction of laptop owners willing to 1. research compatible WLAN/WWAN cards, especially with some manufacturers' habit of BIOS whitelisting; 2. buy one to replace the existing WLAN card; and 3. open their laptop to install it?

      Perhaps this article is just about encouragement to bundle a WLAN/WWAN card in new laptops in place of a WLAN card.

    17. Re:Hol. ly. Sheeeeeit. by tepples · · Score: 1

      BIOS has nothing to do with this. It's an expansion card.

      You'd be surprised. Lenovo has a habit of using BIOS to restrict expansion cards.

      Why not? People buy desktop expansion cards to add new functionality.

      What desktop owners do doesn't necessarily predict what laptop owners do.

  2. non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock the by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock them to ATT only like the ipad's from att?

    MS needs to say no carrier locking!

  3. Enough of this foolishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but I don't need another data plan in addition to my phone. I'll just hotspot from my phone plan as needed.

    1. Re:Enough of this foolishness by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way. I can't imagine a reason I would want multiple wireless devices. Tethering serves the purpose well enough, and really, where I am, wireless data limits are low enough that I would never want my notebook just being able to connect to the wireless network willy nilly.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Enough of this foolishness by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Just that typing is less fluent on a phone

  4. Just what Corporate Security needs... by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...another fucking interface to hack.

    While you've got the hood popped, why not just IoT the BIOS while you're at it.

    Yet another design change justified by maximizing recurring revenue for vendors. I grow very tired of being told what I want in a product. Shit is getting old.

    1. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by mlts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This. You have your internal network nice and secure, and then a blackhat uses the cell interface to enable IP forwarding and turn a PC into an open gateway to the Internet for all and sundry to get on the subnet.

    2. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by jiriw · · Score: 1

      What a marvelous idea you have! And think of all the crimes of stolen laptops you can solve with an unremovable connection at the BIOS level! And, in time, less robberies. Less burglaries as well, I guess. Everything implemented in the most user friendly way possible of course. No need to be bothered installing your own, imperfect, anti-theft services. The 'cloud' will solve it all (including the breezy feel in your cranium).
      How much safer this world will be! That pesky bit of freedom we have to offer for that is nothing compared.

      You can now switch off your sarcasm detector if you usually have need for it.

      If Microsoft ever implements mobile connection technology in PC-grade equipment, before I even remotely would touch that stuff, I want a guarantee I can swap out/backup/etc e-SIMs in that hardware myself AND hardware-switch enable/disable the feature. Yes, I want a ****** button and traces on the PCB I can follow that show me the hardware can be disabled.

    3. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If Microsoft ever implements mobile connection technology in PC-grade equipment, before I even remotely would touch that stuff, I want a guarantee I can swap out/backup/etc e-SIMs in that hardware myself AND hardware-switch enable/disable the feature. Yes, I want a ****** button and traces on the PCB I can follow that show me the hardware can be disabled.

      Have you not seen what Apple has done with their "Pro" grade portable assets and the profit margins they enjoy with designing a sealed box, with all upgrade paths soldered permanently to the chassis?

      Don't assume for a HFT-trading millisecond that any Board of Directors isn't going to clone that fucking profit model.

      The future of portable computing has already been defined, based on corporate greed.

      In short, fuck what you want. You'll get whatever maximizes their revenue.

      Oh, and I fully expect a push from corporate lobbyists to make DIY illegal in some way, so you can forget about that build-it-yourself Kickstarter idea to re-enable the concept of choice...

    4. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because this has never been done before. Cellular cards have been included with laptops before, the Dell Latitude line used to have this as an option, and it was extremely convenient to have for remote workers who could not get a Internet connection. Maybe get off your high horse and quit being a baby and think about what the consumer might want.

      Perhaps you were too busy ranting and didn't see that whole non-removable part in TFS. Clone an embedded SIM and enable a data stream without a users knowledge? Oh right, 'cause that shit that would never happen.

      And after seeing what Apple did with their "Pro" line of hardware, feel free to provide evidence that manufacturers give a flying fuck about what you want. You'll get whatever maximizes their revenue, and like it.

    5. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      I have heard that the AMT stuff is only physically bound to the primary interface in a system. Even if it isn't you could use an add-in NIC which will bypass AMT altogether.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    6. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Next step - Windows wont start up if no valid data carrier is found.
      Monthly pricing is yet to be announced...

    7. Re: Just what Corporate Security needs... by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      Fun. Then the black hat uses it to download child porn and other illegal material, and guess who is the one going to jail? I better be able to shut the damn thing off (and I mean OFF, as in the circuit gets no power and is disabled through a full physical switch/break in the circuit) or NO SALE

    8. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by geekmux · · Score: 2

      eh, they'll go too far at some point and a startup will fill the void. Carpe diem.

      That void will be made illegal by the Free 'Murica Act, because you know, we'll have to think of the terrorist children by then.

    9. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Just have the bootstrap on the device and download the OS from the cloud at each reboot.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    10. Re: Just what Corporate Security needs... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then take your "NO SALE" and enjoy paying three times as much for a customized laptop without the "feature".

    11. Re: Just what Corporate Security needs... by mlts · · Score: 1

      Personally, I want the ability to unplug and physically remove the antenna, and a little clear window on the device showing its absence on a quick visual inspection. Just one of these laptops can mean a complete and udder compromise of a company network on a massive scale. Even worse, an IDS/IPS internally wouldn't see the cellular traffic.

      Even better, I'd like makers to have some extension in the model name showing this feature is present, so I know what models to avoid.

      There are very few things I can think of worse than a business computer with 24/7 cell access.

    12. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I fully expect a push from corporate lobbyists to make DIY illegal in some way, so you can forget about that build-it-yourself Kickstarter idea to re-enable the concept of choice...

      That's not realistic, there's no real way for them to do that without impinging on their own freedoms. But they might well lobby for laws which make modifying their product illegal...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have heard that the AMT stuff is only physically bound to the primary interface in a system. Even if it isn't you could use an add-in NIC which will bypass AMT altogether.

      Except you can't, because they're taking expansion slots out of devices. You can use an add-on NIC dongle, but those are inferior and overpriced.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re: Just what Corporate Security needs... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      ... a complete and udder compromise ...

      Were you the one who kept writing the "moo cows" posts that were so common here before the "app apps" posts took over?

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    15. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I fully expect a push from corporate lobbyists to make DIY illegal in some way, so you can forget about that build-it-yourself Kickstarter idea to re-enable the concept of choice...

      That's not realistic, there's no real way for them to do that without impinging on their own freedoms. But they might well lobby for laws which make modifying their product illegal...

      Based on USPTO activity for the last decade, the mega-corps have already patented their "freedoms", thus nullifying any concerns about deploying the jack-booted lobbyist army.

    16. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Uh, you can always set the cellular data connection to be disabled by default, and not enable it unless you happen to be traveling and explicitly do it for that purpose.

    17. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very true... but there is a difference between a software setting that can have an "accidental" debug mode which allows it to be turned on somehow and some mechanism ensuring it is off, and not coming on.

    18. Re:Just what Corporate Security needs... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Or your user finds some way to enable it so they can watch for Facebook posts.

    19. Re: Just what Corporate Security needs... by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      sexconker would be the culprit my dude. He forget to check the post anonymously box a while back and busted himself.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
  5. The Microsoft business plan by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Trying to figure out if Microsoft wants to eventually extinguish the cell phone or the PC... judging by the amount of sense they've been making lately, it's probably the PC.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:The Microsoft business plan by Pitawg · · Score: 2

      Not so much kill the PC, as convert PC into the phone that they could not sell to the masses.

      "Noone is buying our new phone any more than our old phone, but they are still buying PCs. Let's convert it right under their noses to a phone that won't fit in their pocket. After they get used to it, we can start shrinking them down in size until it becomes their new phone. Our phone, not robo or peach.... then we Win! Doh!"

    2. Re:The Microsoft business plan by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      How about both? A terminal as stupid as possible where everything you run is on their servers. Unless you have decent coverage you won't even be able to call an emergency service because you need to download the emergency service app first.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:The Microsoft business plan by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

      Ditching their bread and butter for foreign territory? Sounds risky but also sounds like MS needs to take* more risks.

      * and stick with!!! no rebranding, no flash in the pan then extinguishing zune/band/kin/etc

  6. How about asking if consumers want it? by H3lldr0p · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That seems like a much better question than if the carriers would do it. Since, you know, that would be the first step to convincing the carriers to get on board. By showing demand.

    1. Re:How about asking if consumers want it? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Since when do consumer wishes come into play? Did you want thinner phones that require a cover now?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:How about asking if consumers want it? by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this is HOW they ask users if they want it... announce it's coming, then listen to slashdot for the neckbeards to revolt. Then when they notice that nerds don't want it, but among normal people are a big enough market... they move forward.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  7. Not a chance in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow the tech industry has an incredibly short memory. Do you remember how cellular carriers had to be dragged, kicking and screaming, into the smartphone era? They don't want "unapproved devices" running on their networks, where "unapproved devices" means anything running software they don't like.

    1. Re:Not a chance in hell by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You have an even shorter memory. You can buy a Mifi device right now that use cellular and run any app you want over it.

    2. Re:Not a chance in hell by tepples · · Score: 1

      Because not everybody already carries a smartphone with a tethering-enabled data plan.

  8. Latency? by Calydor · · Score: 2

    I assume they're going to make sure you get as good or better latency than a wired connection?

    I also assume they're going to pressure carriers into providing proper data plans, not like my phone's plan that just this month got upgraded to all of 500 MB monthly data?

    If no to either one of these (and likely a lot more caveats by people smarter than me) then no to even considering it being possibly a good idea.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  9. Re:Internet of Ears by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    If the NSA approves it.

    Pre-derail-derail: Something something Trump something Clinton something Putin something something Brexit something Westworld!

    Is it a keyword list for triggering Echelon or something?
    I haven't seen these for quite some time.

  10. Re:Internet of Ears by flopsquad · · Score: 2

    Something something Trump something Clinton something Putin something something Brexit something Westworld!

    That's a pretty weird list of items to wear on your wedding day.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
  11. I'd pay for data...if all updates are free by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest problem with Microsoft getting near a data plan is that you could easily see a scenario where most of your data was getting sucked up by Microsoft's ever-present upgrades. That, and, having to wait an extra 10-15 minutes when you really want to restart your phone.

  12. iPads have cell radios by wiredog · · Score: 1

    You can buy monthly plans through the carriers. I haven't needed it since my Nexus phone has a hotspot feature.

  13. Re:non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think bigger. Unremovable cellular cards so that they can always be used to spy, even if not actively being paid for.

    --
    Good-bye
  14. Great business plan. by CptLoRes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Create a new problem by taking away user control of bandwidth usage, forcing untimely app and windows update,s telemetry etc. 2. Sell a solution to the new problem.

  15. Re:lolnope by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Further to that, hell no.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  16. Only if by dwillden · · Score: 1

    They change to a removeable card. Being locked into a carrier is not a good idea. Not only for the problem of movoing to an area where the carrier for your computer has lousy service. The idea is being pushed to aid business travelers who hate having to hunt for wi-fi access. In the US one of the big four will cover most metro areas, but what about the rest of the world where, travel 20 minutes to another country and you have to choose a different national carrier.

    If locked to one carrier the answer is no. Micro$oft needs to implement this with changeable sims. Add that feature to a larger antenna than you can fit into a phone and allow it to act as a hotspot as well and you have something of value. Well except for those afraid of a little telemetry. But for the other 99% of customers it would be a great Idea. Especially if I can get it on a large data cap plan (or true unlimited data like my Sprint account) without breaking the bank each month. If data caps are the norm then let me go into the store and adjust my plan for the month or even the week to allow for more data for a short term when needed.

    It has to be able to switch carriers and do it quickly and easily. No Sprint in this area, Let me pick up a pay as I go Verizon SIM, or AT&T SIM, heading overseas I can swap in the local sim of my choice .

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  17. Re:non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and you will pay the roaming fees that can be as high as $15-$20 A MEG!

    also pay for TXT spam at $0.15-$0.25 meg and $0.50-$1.00 roaming.

  18. Re:non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock by Alumoi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He, he, you're too late buddy. Why do you think batteries are soldered to the phones now?

  19. Re:Non-removable + Microsoft = non-sequitur by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Why do my back hairs ruffle whenever I read the word "Microsoft" next to the word "non-removable"?

    Just don't buy any Microsoft butt plugs!

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  20. Re: It makes sense by Alumoi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dell Wireless 5520 (3G HSDPA) works for me in *buntu and derivates.

  21. Re: Internet of Ears by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    Ahllu Akbar! (waits for the feds to knock on my door)

  22. Drill by clonehappy · · Score: 2

    Meet cellular modem chip.

  23. Ahahaha by fubarrr · · Score: 1

    >purchase cellular data for those cards through the Windows Store

    Cloning somebody's SIM card has just got much easier!

  24. Re:non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock by degantyll · · Score: 1

    Roaming fees for Data? You mean roaming between cellphone providers or roaming between states?

  25. Re:Control by degantyll · · Score: 1

    Damn... this is scary

  26. Re:non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Always until I cut one trace to the IC, or lift it entirely. On the other hand, they're making it harder and harder to open the case without destroying the harware...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  27. One more reason to close the book on MS by Noishkel · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is just a joke and a meme anymore than an actual good choice for software. Windows 10 has been a complete failure, and Windows Phones are an even bigger failure. And now Microsoft has decided to double down to attempt to drag more people into their honey pot and walled gardens by running all of it's security through a cell phone carrier that your going to have to pay to keep using.

    No thank you Microsoft. I hate your phones, and I hate your direction in the OS market. So I'm not going to buy your god awful phones any more than I'm going to ever upgrade beyond Windows 7 until it can not be avoided any longer. And even then I may just say screw it and go fully to Android for an OS and Steam for the gaming.

  28. The Micro$oft Piece by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    Many organizations already have this. It's necessary for first responders who have laptops in emergency vehicles to maintain in constant contact with dispatch. It comes in over a VPN setup through the mobile carrier data. It automatically switches from WiFI to LTE depending on access availability. First Responder organizations are usually Governments with existing carrier contracts for special pricing. There's no need to pay an additional Micro$oft tithe.

  29. Phone PC's by ITRambo · · Score: 1

    This will work with newer phone form factor PC's running full Windows 10. Nothing else makes sense to me.

    1. Re:Phone PC's by unixisc · · Score: 1

      So it'll be a Windows phablet?

  30. Yawn. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    Is it *really* that big a deal outside the sealed & laminated Apple universe to just stick a mPCIe slot on the mobo's underside, cover it with a tiny hatch, and pre-embed suitable antennas for it in the display & run the wires to that same hatch/slot? Most mid+ end laptops *already* have an extra mPCIe slot (though only high-end corporate laptops usually advertise it as a feature & make it officially accessible for things like cellular modems... in most mid-range laptops, it's more like a forgotten, semi-vestigial socket that exists only for factory-installed modules).

    The truth is, unless the laptop mfr is an asshole & explicitly locks out "unapproved" mPCIe cards in the UEFI BIOS, as far as Windows & Linux are concerned, they're just normal 1x (4x?) PCI Express slots waiting to be used for something (warning: MANY such slots can work as EITHER mSATA or mPCIe, but the two DO have different pinouts despite having the same form factor & connector... if they don't support mSATA, you'll need a MUCH more exotic & expensive mPCIe SSD with embedded SATA controller like the ones Apple uses in iMacs for flash/ssd or fusion drives).

    Likewise, most gaming laptops w/discrete video cards use cards that are electronically-compatible... what makes them proprietary is the fact there's no real standard for dimensions, hole-placement, or cooling of laptop video cards, so you could end up with a laptop that can use an arbitrary video card, but will cook it in seconds, not allow it to be properly mounted, or not have enough room for it).

    1. Re:Yawn. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of pressure for laptops to be as thin and light as possible - it's one of the main factors people take into consideration when choosing a laptop. Just as in phones, compromises are made to reduce thickness and weight. Removable components take up more space, so they have to go.

    2. Re:Yawn. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of pressure for laptops to be as thin and light as possible - it's one of the main factors people take into consideration when choosing a laptop. Just as in phones, compromises are made to reduce thickness and weight. Removable components take up more space, so they have to go.

      Let's try this again.

      Removable components imply that an end-user could actually perform their own upgrades, using cheaper 3rd party components.

      Soldering every fucking thing to the chassis and sealing the case shut enables corporations to charge you whatever the hell they want for every upgrade, forced upon consumers at the time of purchase.

      Fuck You Very Much Apple for paving the path to enslaving the consumer. No company is going to make hardware any other way now. Your profit margins make that quite clear.

    3. Re:Yawn. by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      The vast majority of end users do not perform upgrades of even their PCs, let alone their laptops. For most, a laptop is an appliance and they are happy with it that way. More, the need to constantly upgrade components to stay useful has slowed. Decent hardware that's five years old is still useful. The top end still moves one, and there are still people who genuinely need as much speed or power as they can get, but the bulk of the market does not.

      Wanting a laptop that's easy to upgrade is a feature that a vanishingly small number of people want. It's a niche market. You obviously fall into that category and so do most on this forum, myself included. That means we get a narrower range of options when they exist at all, and will end up paying a premium for them.

      Swearing at Apple because you aren't their market is ... odd.

  31. Re:non-removable programmable SIM so ATT can lock by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    An active cellular card is effectively a backdoor into your computer. If your computer is connected to your network, then it's also a backdoor into your network.

    I doubt it would take much in the way of malware . . . . er . . . . NIT as the FBI calls it, to enable that cellular interface without telling you about it.
    Some cooperation from the local telco would authorize the SIM on their network and presto, instant access from everywhere.

    As it stands now, any device I own that has a cellular interface resides on a protected VLAN. ( phones, tablets, alarm system, etc )
    I do not let those devices converse with any of the other networks as I have no way of knowing who, when and what will have access to the device in question.
    If it needs access to network resources, it gets a physical cable.

    If incapable of using a physical cable, it doesn't get access to those resources.

    I see a future in shielded laptop bags :|

  32. Re:It makes sense by StayFrosty · · Score: 1

    Yup. All of them.

    --
    "Frequently wrong, never in doubt."
  33. Surface has that NOW by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Microsoft does have cellular Surfaces, which work w/ GSM networks like AT&T and T-Mobile, but unfortunately, not w/ Verizon or Sprint. The lack of Verizon is one of the things that kept me from getting one.

    They should do two types of Surfaces - just like everyone does w/ cellphones. One that comes unlocked, but where one can put in anyone's SIM: such a thing would be particularly useful in foreign GSM markets. The other can be locked down w/ whatever - Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, et al. So if one buys the thing from a carrier, they can get the locked version w/ the subscription, and if they want the movable (b/w carriers) model, they can buy it in a Microsoft store. Such a thing would probably be better received than the Lumia

  34. Tethering by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Has MS not heard of this? You won't need to fumble with sims or have multiple asubscriptions.. This is already solved.

  35. The worst of Treacherous Computing + carriers. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    All that Microsoft wants to do is shove TC in a device when people really don't want it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  36. "help them better manage the use of data plans" by iampiti · · Score: 1

    ...yeah sure, except for the Windows' updates and telemetry which you can bet the user won't be able to disable.

  37. Re:Part of their plan to make Windows a service? by meerling · · Score: 1

    LoL, you haven't seen some of the cell coverage around here, or rather the lack of it. Some friends of mine have Tmobile and the millisecond they cross the city boundry their connection goes dead. Even if we are on I-5, probably the busiest backbone highway of the pacific west! They can't even make calls in many of the coastal cities other than Newport.

  38. Getting carriers on-board is tough but worth a try by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    Microsoft itself won't be selling the majority of these devices, though I expect we will see a Surface 4 and possibly finally see a Surface Mini. I think the non-removable part is mostly about making it possible to make the devices thinner and less expensive to manufacture by eliminating the SIM slot, with getting to market the plans being a side benefit. It's also possible that Microsoft's real goal here is to use their muscle to get lower prices for cellular data, which would improve sales of their devices and other devices that license Windows.

    Offering cellular plans through the Windows Store will be a non-starter unless Microsoft offers the carriers a drastically reduced rate for those sales; the 30% that they get for app sales is a non-starter. It's also going to go nowhere in most of the world unless Microsoft is prepared to partner with a LOT of providers. The Asian markets, in particular, will just stick with standard SIM slots unless that happens.