Slashdot Mirror


Why China Can't Lure Tech Talent (bloomberg.com)

China may have been hoping to attract tech talent to its nation, but it is unlikely that people in the tech industry will move there. A columnist at Bloomberg explains why: The biggest problem is government control of the internet. For a software developer, the inconvenience goes well beyond not being able to access YouTube during coffee breaks. It means that key software libraries and tools are often inaccessible. In 2013, China blocked Github, a globally important open-source depository and collaboration tool, thereby forcing developers to seek workarounds. Using a virtual private network to "tunnel" through the blockades is one popular option. But VPNs slow uploads, downloads and collaboration. And it isn't just developers who suffer. Among the restricted sites in China is Google Scholar, a tool that indexes online peer-reviewed studies, conference proceedings, books and other research material into an easily accessible format. It's become a crucial database for academics around the world, and Chinese researchers -- even those with VPNs -- struggle to use it. The situation grew so dire this summer that several state-run news outlets published complaints from Chinese scientists, with one practically begging the nationalist Global Times newspaper: "We hope the government can relax supervision for academic purposes." The cumulative impact of these restrictions is significant. Scientists unable to keep up with what researchers in other countries are publishing are destined to be left behind, which is one reason China is having difficulty luring foreign scholars to its universities. Programmers who can't take advantage of the sites and tools that make development a global effort are destined to write software customized solely for the Chinese market. The author has raised several other reasons to make his case.

219 comments

  1. How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would never have thought that people with good educations and job prospects wouldn't want to move to a country with totalitarian control of your daily life. Next you're going to tell me North Korea has similar problems.

    1. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daily life in China is closer to that in the USA than to North Korea.

    2. Re:How strange by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      Daily life in China is closer to that in the USA than to North Korea.

      Most personal, daily life is even freer than in the USA. For example, nobody gives a shit where you smoke, and hardly any concern about how you drive, where you park, etc.

    3. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daily life in China is closer to that in the USA than to North Korea.

      Most personal, daily life is even freer than in the USA. For example, nobody gives a shit where you smoke, and hardly any concern about how you drive, where you park, etc.

      Of course you can smoke any time in China. They just call it breathing over there ;^)

      The government also has no concern at all about driving and parking. The traffic is just like LA or Manhattan, constant gridlock and you simply park anywhere you can find a space (which is generally illegally on a residential street/alley nowhere near a parking lot since there are 3x the number of cars than legal parking spaces because central planning failed to provide any parking space or parking lots for all the cars).

      Now, if you want to spend you life sitting a corner coffee shop sipping a latte and buying stuff on TaoBao (the Chinese amazon) or checking out your friend selfies on RenRen (the Chinese Facebook), it's actually not that different than the USA (except everyone speaks Chinese sprinkled with a few words of "american").

      But that's not "freer" than the USA. You can't move without a residency permit, no talking about the 3-T's (aka, Tienanmen, Tibet, Taiwan), and you still generally have to apply "grease" to get things done (remember, the Chinese invented bureaucracy)

    4. Re:How strange by irrational_design · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?

    5. Re: How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're a member of Falun Gong..

    6. Re:How strange by OakDragon · · Score: 1

      What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?

      Then you need modern America style freedom. :)

      (BTW I don't live there or anything, was just watching some YouTube videos featuring western guys working in China.)

    7. Re:How strange by golgotha007 · · Score: 2

      >> For example, nobody gives a shit where you smoke, and hardly any concern about how you drive, where you park, etc.

      where you spit, where you piss, etc. no thanks.

    8. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you still generally have to apply "grease" to get things done (remember, the Chinese invented bureaucracy)

      jia you - ! (apply grease) :P

    9. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?"

      That doesn't count because it's not edgy enough.

    10. Re: How strange by jcr · · Score: 1

      Or you openly criticize the Red Dynasty...

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?

      That isn't freedom, that's oppression of smokers, you want to be free of second hand smoke, you're free to go home.

      sincerely the libertarians for smokers' freedom.

    12. Re:How strange by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Daily life in China is closer to that in the USA than to North Korea.

      Most personal, daily life is even freer than in the USA. For example, nobody gives a shit where you smoke, and hardly any concern about how you drive, where you park, etc.

      Where you smoke? While I'm myself a non-smoker - have always been - I've lost count of the number of states that have banned smoking both indoors and outdoors at most establishments

    13. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a HEPA mask.

    14. Re:How strange by OakDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've lost count of the number of states that have banned smoking

      I'm thinking no more than 50.

    15. Re: How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except speaking mandarin.

      Most tech talent speaks English as that's just how it's been. That will probably change as China keeps becoming more important but it is how it is.

      Very difficult to be worthwhile or even enjoy life when you don't speak a language. Or even if you speak like a 5 yr old.

      Wo yao ippei pijyou! As long as I'm in a bar I'm fucking fluent.

    16. Re:How strange by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've lived in Shanghai and the most eye opening part about it is was how spectacularly wrong my American colleagues were about China. Before I left to live there, I was told how Communist it was, how dangerous it was, how there was no freedom. What I found was a country that is way more capitalist than the US and people pretty much leading the life they wanted. There are so many things that squash your freedom in the West but you don't notice it because you've known no better,

    17. Re: How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Become a vape fag and suck the crack pipe.

    18. Re:How strange by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Still when it comes to luring employees, countries are competing. So not whether it is reasonable in China but how well it competes against other employment centres. So for China, logically relocating tech companies seeking to bring in foreign employees to Hainan https://www.lonelyplanet.com/c... makes sense. Employment conditions and wages will not drive recruitment, lifestyle when not at work will. At the end of the day, sticking to this list makes the most sense for employers and employees http://www.economist.com/blogs..., word of mouth and reasonable work conditions and wages will drive successfully long lasting recruitment, although admittedly if you attempt to transfer staff from those locations once they have settled, chances are really high they will quit and seek local employment along with permanent immigration. I know quite a few foreign staff who left companies rather than leave Adelaide Australia, especially cold climate foreigners, one year and it often becomes permanent.

      Unless you can get in that top 10 to 20 you will always struggle against other locations, that are in the top 10. Keep in mind it has an economic advantage because you can pay less and still more readily retain staff, especially if employment conditions beyond your own company for their skill sets are pretty slim.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re: How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange but true. On third tier places in China you have people shitting in shopping malls and kids wearing pants with opening at the ass so they can shit anywhere they like. I had a cleaner from China helping to clean my house once a week and when she saw my 2yr old Son wearing normal pants, she ask why I didn't buy those with opening and talking about how inconvinient it is like wearing normal pants is so passe.

      I was flabbergasted. But I've been to Shanghai and Beijing and life there seems quite normal to us. You do have people behaving weird and all but it's quite obvious they are from out of town. There is still a huge cultural, educational and general civility gap between big cities and smaller ones etc.

    20. Re:How strange by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      That sounds less free to me, forced by an oppressive bully to breath his smoke. Bullied on the road by bad, aggressive drivers.
      Your definition of freedom needs work.

    21. Re:How strange by mjwx · · Score: 1

      What about my freedom to be free of your secondhand smoke?

      Firstly I agree with your point. Fortunately most smokers in the UK are extremely polite about their bad habits.

      But I have to ask, have you ever been to China? People smoke everywhere there.

      That is a huge part of the reason why people dont want to work there. If you want to attract talent, you either have to offer insane wages and packages like they used to in Dubai or offer good wages and packages in some place people want to live. Expats are attracted to places like California, Southern England, Paris, Amsterdam and others because these places are very nice places to live, Most places in China are the complete opposite. Sure Hong Kong can attract talent, but not Guangzhou or even Beijing as these places dont have the amenities, let alone quality of life as London, San Francisco, Amsterdam, Bangkok...or even Manila.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    22. Re:How strange by mjwx · · Score: 2

      I've lived in Shanghai and the most eye opening part about it is was how spectacularly wrong my American colleagues were about China. Before I left to live there, I was told how Communist it was, how dangerous it was, how there was no freedom. What I found was a country that is way more capitalist than the US and people pretty much leading the life they wanted. There are so many things that squash your freedom in the West but you don't notice it because you've known no better,

      Whilst I agree that Americans tend to swallow a lot of propaganda about China that is horribly incorrect (yep, China is communist in name only and provided you don't rock the boat you can get away with a lot), Shanghai and Hong Kong are oddities amongst China because of the high levels of foreign activities in these cities, even after the PLA took Shanghai in 1947, Beijing never really controlled it and still don't to a large degree. Beijing are content to leave Shanghai to it's own devices as long as they don't cause problems. That being said, even in other provinces and Beijing itself, you wont find yourself bothered by the government much... Doubly so as a foreigner. The rule of thumb is not to cause trouble, If you make trouble for the government (or anyone in power really) then of course they're going to deal with you.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about my freedom to be free from your second hand bull shit.

    24. Re:How strange by cthulhu11 · · Score: 2

      This is a country where science is repeatedly faked, and where Qigong practitioners are imprisoned and harvested for organs. I've talked to people in the US who have worked for Chinese companies: - Amazon-scale expectation of uncompensated overtime - Yelling and threatening is routine and accepted - Travel expenses are not reimbursed - Ridicule of religious, spiritual, and ethical practices is tolerated and encouraged. In short, it's almost as though Trump runs them. I'm sure there are exceptions, but the above has been the consistent narrative I've heard. I've also personally experienced 3 out of 4 above from a manager from the PRC at a US company. When I didn't even report to him.

    25. Re:How strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My wife is Australian and I've spent a lot of time there. I really don't get the appeal of the country, and especially a backwater like Adelaide. Much of it is over priced, isolatingly suburban, mono cultural with horrendous weather in summer and a fuck of a long way from anywhere with an interesting culture or not. Aussies go on endlessly about temperatures in the 40s as if it's a badge of honour, but when it strikes they live in fear of fires and cower in the shade indoors, and forget about going for a picnic out on the 'grass'.

    26. Re:How strange by dddux · · Score: 1

      What about my freedom to be free from having to inhale car exhaust?

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
  2. Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I went to Beijing and it was pollution hell. Couldn't see further than 50 feet in front of you somedays.

    1. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah this definitely discourages me: http://www.npr.org/sections/th...
      And 3 years before that they said it was 10%: http://china.org.cn/environmen...
      So do you believe it's really 20% or actually higher?

      If you don't believe that it's a problem perhaps you can convince these bunch:
      http://articles.latimes.com/20...
      http://www.theglobeandmail.com...

      See also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all that coal they burn. I'd like to take everyone who thinks the EPA should be dismantled and have them live in Beijing and make spend at least 8 hours outside.

    3. Re:Also, the pollution by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. Trump will restore Los Angeles to its former smoggy glory.

    4. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But... the Chinese Government has much more control than the EPA could dream...

      Maybe less meddling by the government is what is actually the good thing; after all, "private" property owners want their property kept in good condition.

    5. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might still be an improvement over New Delhi, though.

    6. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hope you do not actual write Software with that logic.

      Having Control and using it to control pollution are not the same. They would rater make money then have Clean air. Just like Americain Companies did before the EPA.

      You logic is the less Government control the cleaner the Air? History Disagrees.

    7. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, history does not disagree; the worst polluters had special privileges and monopolies granted by governments, and the motivation to clean up the environment started within "private" society, not "public" office. Government is like that guy who jumps in front of the parade and pretends to lead it!

      Why should anyone be thankful for the EPA? Putting aside all of the horrendous mistakes and oversights of that organization, is it not possible that there is a far better alternative way to manage the tug-of-war between resource utilization and resource preservation? I would never trust an organization to do a good job, if that organization is not subject to going out of business, especially if that organization receives ever more money as a reward for performing badly at its job.

    8. Re:Also, the pollution by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What you're missing is that the Party members and their cronies own/run the coal mines and coal plants, too. It's not a communist system anymore, per se, but more of a state-owned enterprise that isn't even really socialism so much as it is "State Capitalism" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ). They could shut it off or switch, but the party and its cronies are making money off the current power plants, and don't want to switch.

      So imagine what would happen if the coal mines and coal plants were owned/run by the same people who were best buddies with, and members of the same party as, the people who run the government. The government may well have the power to shut down those coal plants overnight, but it doesn't matter a damn if they're not going to use it.

    9. Re:Also, the pollution by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Putting aside all of the horrendous mistakes and oversights of that organization, is it not possible that there is a far better alternative way to manage the tug-of-war between resource utilization and resource preservation?

      By all means, share with us that alternative way.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    10. Re:Also, the pollution by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And what did "private" society do to clean up the environment? Mobilized to force politicians to enact laws and regulations, that's what, because that's what works most efficiently. Government leads the parade because we put it there, because nobody else has the power to do what we need it to do. If we created some other entity with that ability, it would just be 'government' by a different name.

      The EPA could certainly be run better. It could certainly do a better job. I've yet to hear real suggestions about that, as opposed to knee-jerk "Government bad, private sector free market good" drivel. The private sector would murder babies if it increased profits and nobody stopped them, because that's how capitalism works if left unchecked. Capitalism can do very good things, but like nuclear energy, if you don't control it, it makes a huge frakking mess. Don't believe me? Go read up on Slavery. (No, Slavery wasn't about race at first - it was about money. The racist stuff was what people invented to help themselves feel less terrible about the terrible things they were doing to other humans).

      Clearly the problem is that we need to do a better job of controlling our government - but I think the problem is less that the agencies run amuck, so much as some of the people we're sending to Washington who have no interest in seeing the government be run well. We elect people that say "Government is Terrible", and then we're surprised when they give us terrible government?

    11. Re:Also, the pollution by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      I went to Beijing and it was pollution hell. Couldn't see further than 50 feet in front of you somedays.

      I went to Guangzhou and it was quite nice.

      YMMV.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    12. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... government saved us from government-induced catastrophes. Wow.

    13. Re: Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      caca

    14. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it in winter?

    15. Re:Also, the pollution by jbengt · · Score: 2

      . . . and the motivation to clean up the environment started within "private" society, not "public" office.

      So, the people insisted that the government help clean up the environment, and the government "of the people and by the people" followed the people's lead and did just that, and that's evidence that it's all the government's fault?

    16. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a communist system anymore, per se, but more of a state-owned enterprise that isn't even really socialism so much as it is "State Capitalism"

      Funny you should say that. It's been said that modern China is effectively closest to the realisation of fascism as originally envisioned by Mussolini, and the article you link to covers this very topic.

    17. Re:Also, the pollution by stabiesoft · · Score: 2

      You mean like trump making the exxon guy sec of state? Welcome to the new USA or as I like to call it now BRA, Banana Republic of America. And the mnemonic so fits our tic-tac prez elect.

    18. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, clearly the original mistake was the government outlawing slavery and debtors prison. Then when a mining company leaves a shithole of a mess we could press every last employee and stockholder into chain gangs to clean out their acidic tailing pools instead of crying to mommy government to save them from the people and property they damaged by allowing them to declare bankruptcy.

      And if the CEO is too pansy-ass to sling sludge, we can put him to work in a brothel sucking a different kind of sludge until his debts are paid off.

    19. Re:Also, the pollution by jcr · · Score: 1

      Mobilized to force politicians to enact laws and regulations, that's what, because that's what works most efficiently.

      What's your next guess?

      McDonald's gave up the plastic clamshell containers because of people bitching about it. There were no regs forcing them to do so.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    20. Re:Also, the pollution by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      It was Spring. The weather was ok.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    21. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Governments at the highest levels are the ones that have enshrined slavery and segegation, despite the fact that Capitalism revealed those practices to be economically stupid.

      In most of the West, Capitalism thankfully prevailed; only the boneheads in the U.S. had to fight a bloody war over slavery, and that costly decision was... again... made by a government.

    22. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonald's has competition and while food is a necessity, a Big Mac is not. This allows public pressure to enable change without the need for regulating clamshell containers.

      Conversely, utilities such as electrical power, telecommunication service, water and garbage disposal are not usually subject to competition and are commonly considered necessities. This means public pressure will not have an impact on the bottom line, practically speaking.

      Hence, regulations. I agree they suck but their existence is a effect rather than a cause. If you find yourself with a headache after a night of really heavy drinking, do you conclude that you drank to much or not enough? When I see regulations, I don't like them but my first thought isn't 'who thought this (regulation) was a good idea?', I think 'which asshat(s) ruined it for everyone else?'

    23. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While what you point out is true, it is not a flaw with the concept of regulations. Rather, you point to flaws in specific regulations resulting from conflicts of interest. The best remedy for that (in the United States anyway) happens every two years in November and at other times - Voting.

      Voting is one enforcement of a set of regulations called the Constitution. Of course, the process is also flawed because just like regulations and conflicts of interest, it involves people who also have their own flaws.

      I once read that Communism, in concept, is the only perfect form of government. Unfortunately, only ants and bees are able to practice it. I don't agree because I'm not an ant or a bee but I sure understand the point being made - it isn't the system, regardless which one we use, it's the participating actors.

    24. Re:Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people gave up their slaves because of people bitching about that too.
      Wait no, different things are different. How many more examples do you want to cherry pick?

    25. Re: Also, the pollution by lecoupdejarnac · · Score: 1

      Well said! Don't trade a fairly transparent (excluding security/military) government for a closed and inaccessible corporation. Not to mention the profit motive!

    26. Re:Also, the pollution by emaname · · Score: 2

      The statement re "private" society mobilizing to create change is still valid.

      The fact that a very few CEOs might actually respond to public concern does happen. McDonald's is one example. Another is Johnson's Wax. The then CEO Sam Johnson was aware of the damage to the ozone caused by chlorofluorocarbons. He instituted a complete change in all their aerosol products and thus was compliant before it ever became law. Sam and, more recently, his son also instituted alternative energy strategies that have resulted in one of their plants going almost entirely off-grid.

      So, yes, "some" CEOs have a moral character. They actually understand the business value of being environmentally responsible. But they are the exception, not the rule. Typically the onus of being environmentally responsible falls to the public.

      --
      An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
    27. Re: Also, the pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I conclude I drank not enough. The fact I'm not in a ditch somewhere with my pants on backwards indicates so.

    28. Re:Also, the pollution by dywolf · · Score: 1

      again proving libertarians are ignorant of history.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  3. The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The real reason is that no one wants to live in China. They also have been offering huge amounts of money to athletes. Any athlete with any other option won't go. The pollution alone will lower your lifespan.

    1. Re:The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Athletes desire to complete against the best at the top of the gam. Like the US with MLS, China isn't even an also-ran when it comes to top professionals. All you'll see is a few mercenaries and big names will past their best cashing in.

    2. Re: The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I actually unnerstood your post. Maybe cause I drunk also..

  4. Are they trying to? by ugen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am not sure they are really trying too hard in the first place. I speak Mandarin (have been studying for many years), have a good resume and appropriate technical background, and spent substantial time in China to have a general idea of how things are - yet I have never been able to attract interest of any Chinese company. Given what I know about their local tech workforce, that's not at all surprising. They have excellent pool of well qualified candidates.

    That's not to say that article does not bring good points - internet use in China is encumbered and painful. But that's has little to do with "attracting tech talent".

    1. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They said tech "talent".

    2. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For each one of you, there are a billion other people who would scoff at the idea of learning Mandarin, let alone moving to a spiffed-up shithole in the ground like China. You cannot even see the crosswalks through all the phlegm that people hock up and spit as they walk around on their vain quest to climb the consumer ladder.

    3. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am not sure they are really trying too hard in the first place. I speak Mandarin (have been studying for many years), have a good resume and appropriate technical background, and spent substantial time in China to have a general idea of how things are - yet I have never been able to attract interest of any Chinese company.

      I am in a situation very similar to you and have been actually interviewing to some Chinese companies and also know people working in those. I am very confident that China is actually trying to lure tech talent from abroad, but they prefer people who have worked in big companies and do not speak Chinese. The reason for the first is that they are very interested in the information they can get from their competitors and use for their advantage, and the reason for the second is that their own company internal information is all in Chinese and they don't want these same employees to leak that to their foreign competitors.

      So to put it short, they want to leech information out of their competition by hiring their ex-workers in any ways possible, but at the same time make sure that they are not leaking out anything. And the fact that you speak Mandarin and understand the Chinese culture to some extent makes you a unattractive candidate. It's much safer to hire Chinese candidates for the basic jobs and hire foreigners (who speak no Chinese) to the positions where they have serious need to catch up.

      I would love to find out I'm just making this all up as a big conspiracy theory, but I have a bit too much stories and examples to support my assertion...

    4. Re:Are they trying to? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      I am not sure they are really trying too hard in the first place. I speak Mandarin (have been studying for many years), have a good resume and appropriate technical background, and spent substantial time in China to have a general idea of how things are - yet I have never been able to attract interest of any Chinese company. Given what I know about their local tech workforce, that's not at all surprising. They have excellent pool of well qualified candidates.

      I've been to China too and I've seen ads placed in English in major foreign newspapers that seem willing to theoretically hire foreigners, but a problem with almost all of these is that they have additional requirements that almost impossible for a foreigner to meet. For example, you can't just speak Mandarin and English but you have to also be fluent or really close to it in Cantonese or Shanghaiese. If a foreigner really knew all those languages they might really have a chance to be hired, but you can probably count on one or two hands how many non-ethnically Chinese foreigners can speak Mandarin plus Cantonese or Shanghaiese. Heck, you basically can't even learn Shanghaiese outside of China if you even want to. Try to find books on it if you're curious. There are at least Cantonese learning materials in the English speaking world but not as many as for Mandarin.

    5. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They said tech "talent".

      http://www.npr.org/sections/th...
      From the linked article:

      And it turns out that the job done in China was above par - the employee's "code was clean, well written, and submitted in a timely fashion. Quarter after quarter, his performance review noted him as the best developer in the building," according to the Verizon Security Blog.

      All told, it looked like he earned several hundred thousand dollars a year, and only had to pay the Chinese consulting firm about fifty grand annually," according to the Security Blog.

      Maybe they're not the best of the best, but neither are most slashdotters or coder either. These bunch are probably better and cheaper than most of you here.

    6. Re:Are they trying to? by slew · · Score: 2

      The requirement for Shanghainese or Cantonese for some jobs in China is similar to the requirement for knowing Spanish in the USA. For some jobs, you will never know what is *really* going on if you don't know the language people curse at each other in and you will be completely ineffective.

      For front-office jobs that are populated by token "whites", generally knowing a little Mandarin (Putonghua) is enough. They don't really want you to know too much about what is really going on anyways...

    7. Re:Are they trying to? by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Same here. I have a strong telecom background. Lived in Shanghai with my wife for 3 year. Looked for a job for the 7 months. Nothing.
      I ended up teaching English at a private school and private lessons. I made 3 times what doing that as what I was paid as an engineer in the states.
      There was some downsides, to be sure.
      1. Stalkers. Seriously, some of those girls were certifiable. Never imagined I would have to deal with that.
      2. The environment is dirty. You walk down the street and it looks nice and tidy. Looks past the bushes and you can see where all the garbage went.
      3. The air is pretty dirty. I would run every day and I would be blowing black out of my nose the entire day.
      4. The crowds are not for everyone. Seriously, it is crowed on the metro. And loads of the people do not know about deodorant.
      5. Naked capitalism. People in the US like to think that they live in a capitalist society. Bullshit. You don't. China, is the most capitalist place I have ever been. If you were on fire, someone come over and try to sell you a bucket of water. They would never through it on you though. You would need to pay someone else to do that. It is pure capitalism without regard for anything else. That is the reason their environment is so F'ed up.

      Having said that, I enjoyed living in China. I do not think I could ever live there again purely from the health point of view. But, by and large the people treated me well and I had a lot of fun. For now, I think I will stick to Germany.

    8. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > yet I have never been able to attract interest of any Chinese company.
      Chinese culture is very xenophobic. They will hire Chinese, marry Chinese, promote Chinese, return to marry in China, and send money home to China, before they'll take you in.

          On the otherhand, you may have more luck being hired if you spoke no Chinese. That way you could be gleaned from & used, all whilst being smiled to and you would not know any better. But you are educated enough to catch on. You will not be hired in tech there.

      _

    9. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, remember there have been quite a few commenters on this forum who can attest to Chinese business practices. Mainly the technique of business relationships being one way street, and you must negotiate any benefits at all.

      Examples have included variations on the "We get everything and you get nothing aside from the pride of partnering with us". From there one can appeal to logic, forcefully negotiate half, be talked down to a fourth, and finally accept five percent. Or walk. Apparently beginning with an all or nothing proposal is the way it's done there... so in other words, to go with your great story, as a foreign hire- you can leverage nothing and lack of language helps them- not you.

    10. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      3. The air is pretty dirty. I would run every day and I would be blowing black out of my nose the entire day.

      Strangely enough, I encountered the same problem in London and I was not outdoor very much at all. I was only outdoors long enough to walk to the subway station, take a 20 minute ride to the office, and then take the same route back at the end of the work day. I would blow my nose sometime in the evening and the mucus was blackish, which I had never encountered before living my entire live in the U.S.

    11. Re: Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Germany. Please, stay a while and enjoy socialist, world-class healthcare for about 700â/month, socialist pension system for about 400â per month (at 60k â salary). Which is still before taxes, mind.
      Still, the people are decent, the wine is world-class, the food great, especially now that the turkish immigrants are slowly leaving the shwarma-stage behind - those guys can cook!
      Just don not go north-east. And never, ever mention the war.

    12. Re: Are they trying to? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And never, ever mention the war.

      Like this?

    13. Re:Are they trying to? by Malc · · Score: 1

      I lived there in 2008 and had an amazing time too. Did you ever read Peter Hessler's "River Town: Two Years on the Yangtze"? Pretty much captured my experience and daily frustrations until I started figuring it out.

    14. Re:Are they trying to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the mistakes in your English, I hope you had fun 'teaching'. Thanks for sharing your story about being the white face for some 'school'.

    15. Re:Are they trying to? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I visited London maybe 25 years ago, and found that, on days I took the tube (subway, for Americans), I blew black stuff out of my nose.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  5. Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tone-based languages are a terrible idea; now, add to that a logographic writing system, and you've got a real cluster fuck!

    The Information Age has no time for such nonsense.

    1. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Tonal languages are not, in and of themselves, an inherently bad idea. It's just one more parameter which can be used to add information density without having to rush the actual mechanics of the speaker. The fact that some people are tone-deaf may pose a problem, just like the fact that some people are color-blind makes color coding a troublesome way to transmit critical information.

      The character set used is not necessarily tied to this – it would be perfectly workable to retain the character set but speak a non-tonal language, and it is perfectly workable to write a tonal language in a phonetic alphabet. It just takes a lot of diacritical marks. If keeping the density high is an important goal, Hangul retains that feature while using a phonetic system by forming the characters into blocks representing syllables.

      The most telling argument against change is that with the vast majority able to read and write, it would take a very large investment to change the writing system. Hangul did it in an era where most people couldn't read – the investment was correspondingly smaller, and it was the right move at the right time. Another argument is that even as languages drift or even have completely different origins, the writing system remains comprehensible to all users Such is not necessarily the case with phonetic languages – given enough time, what's written and what's spoken will diverge even if the spelling made perfect sense at the time it was codified. So maybe the thought process is:

      1. It will take a lot of time and money.
      2. It will break the means of communication between the multiple languages spoken in the country.
      3. It will only provide temporary benefits.
      4. The status quo puts up a significant barrier to foreign meddling.

      Don't underestimate the power of the fourth one.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    2. Re:Also, the native language sucks by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      tell that to the people who think having a convo in all emojis is normal

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't underestimate the power of the fourth"

      I see what you did there.

    4. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what? Only the Chinese speak and write Chinese; indeed, you are an entertaining curiosity if you're a foreigner who can do even one of those things.

      'Nuff said.

      Also, useful languages utilize tone for relaying emotion. I suppose that's why Western Music is endlessly better than the drivel that sneaks out of the East.

    5. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > add to that a logographic writing system

      Why? We're already moving to emoji-based communication...

    6. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Glass houses. English has boatloads of warts also. Awkward spailing rules and weird verb tenses, for example. Perhaps being semi-phonetic helps versus pictographs, but English is far far from the pinnacle.

    7. Re:Also, the native language sucks by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Tone deaf people can speak and understand Chinese. If you take all of the tones away a sentence can be understood, you just have to listen harder. The tones are essentially removed when singing.

    8. Re: Also, the native language sucks by Miamicanes · · Score: 2

      China's dialects and writing systems work quite well. They're just optimized in slightly different ways than English.

      English has lots of what computer scientists would call "forward error correction" -- you can really, REALLY fuck up and mangle English, yet still be understood. In contrast, you could say that Chinese has built-in spatial & temporal data compression... at the expense of error-tolerance.

      For an understanding of how tones work, think about all the different meanings the word "fuck" can have depending on how your pitch changes. Chinese tones are just a systematic way of describing those pitch changes.

      Likewise, Chinese is notoriously hard to *write*, but can actually be slightly easier to *read* than English (at least, if you're comparing difficulty for semi-illiterate native speakers).

      IMHO, 100-500 years from now, English will be the planet's dominant language, but it will probably have imported a few hundred one- and two-character words from Chinese (with 'man', 'woman', 'year', 'month', and 'day' being among the first ones) and use them the exact same way Japanese uses kanji -- as an alternate, more compact way to write common words that could be legitimately written using an alphabet.

      The truth is, you can learn to read and write more than 100 Chinese words in just a few hours. Once you know how to write 'one' through "seven", you only need to learn the character for 'day' to name the days of the week. Learn "eight" through "12" plus the character for "month", and you can name the months in a year. You can even cheat & use arabic digits, effectively learning to name 19 days+months with just two learned characters. Contrast that with the mess we have with English day & month names. In some ways, Chinese has elements of logical order that English lacks.

      TL/DR: The Chinese language works perfectly well for people in China.

    9. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhere around a billion-and-a-half people would like to respectfully disagree with you.

    10. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Straw man. You see, my friend, nobody said anything about English. However, it should be noted that being significantly better than Chinese is all that matters; perfection is irrelevant.

    11. Re: Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your days/months argument doesn't really hold water for English though. I mean, 12/13/2016 after all. And if somebody told me "month four", I can figure out they're talking about April. We have names for them that make no sense, this is true, but you can still communicate perfectly well without them. You just come across as odd to native speakers.

      Fact is, English is extremely simple to learn. It's non-tonal, non-gendered. It has one of the most consistent grammars of any language out there. It falls down on inconsistency with spelling and a somewhat overly large vocabulary (most western European languages have around 110K words, English has well over a million.) But the nice thing is, you can spell things phonetically, which is a fairly simple set of rules, and get close enough that most people can figure out what you were writing. Also, though English has a large vocabulary, you really only need to know about 3K words to be able to communicate effectively. And the massive number of loan words actually makes English easier to learn as inevitably no matter what your L1 is, you'll find loan words from it in English.

    12. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It depends what you are doing. As a spoken language, Chinese is better structured than English.

    13. Re:Also, the native language sucks by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      The character set used is not necessarily tied to this

      . Korea and Japan have used Chinese characters at some point in their histories and theirs are not tonal languages. Vietnam too but I think that is a tonal language.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    14. Re:Also, the native language sucks by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 2

      You've confused familiarity and preference with fact.
      What's a "useful language"? Was there some committee where that was decided? If you grew up where tone was a part of the meaning, you'd have no problems. Just because you lack to capacity to imagine someone with that ability doesn't make it not useful.
      Who said "Western Music" is endlessly better? What is Western Music? Does Bjork count as Western Music? A lot of Westerners hates her music. Is Blues and Jazz Western Music, even though they come from black slaves, and often derided by the "elite" classes?

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    15. Re: Also, the native language sucks by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      One small detail -- Chinese is AT LEAST as genderless as English. It's one somewhat unique feature both languages got RIGHT. The only real advantage English has over Chinese re: gender is that English might make it slightly easier to be intentionally vague about a PERSON's gender. Neither language has silliness like "boats are female (unless they're submarines), chairs are male, and teenage girls are neuter". Or that radio is male if it's an electronic device, but female if it's broadcast content.

    16. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the Chinese? Do you realize there are more Chinese speakers than English speakers in the world, counting both native and non-native speakers?

    17. Re:Also, the native language sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tone-based languages are a terrible idea; now, add to that a logographic writing system, and you've got a real cluster fuck!

      The Information Age has no time for such nonsense.

      Dont think so. Take this Internet appliance : on Twitter with logographic system your 140 character (Unicode) is equivalent of a full page full of text written with alphabet.

      Got this on Slashdot ; make sens for me.

      An American read a one liner thats not very meaningful on Twitter when out of context. Chinese read a full article with arguments and examples out of these 140 characters. (I'm exagerating.)

  6. Pay More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So pay people more than the competition. People will do just about anything for money.

  7. Let not beat around the bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Communism is the reason why few want to move there.

    1. Re:Let not beat around the bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism is the reason why few want to move there.

      You're more than 20 years behind the time.

      The Chinese government's at a level of capitalism that Trump can only aspire to achieve.

  8. No green cards, No ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I lived in China for a year. I loved it. I love the culture, I love the country side. Even the pollution can be handled with a decent apartment with good window seals and air scrubbers. They people are fine (let's face it, all countries have great people and terrible people). But, the reason I, as a software engineer, won't go back: no green cards and you can't own property or start a business. Maybe when your 25 years old, the lack of unfettered internet is the worst thing you can think of. But, as you get older, you become more risk adverse. Why would I invest a life in a country where I cannot be granted permanent residence, even if I marry a citizen? I wouldn't; that's foolish.

    1. Re: No green cards, No ownership by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      China has a green card program. You were misinformed. Maybe you thought that just because you had a temporary job that you could stay there for the rest of your life? No. You teach Chinese people how to do your job, afterwards why does China need you? Try to think logically.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re: No green cards, No ownership by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      Try to think logically.

      Well, if nothing else, you win today's internet award for unnecessarily smug douchiness.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re: No green cards, No ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not really, the Chinese "Green Card" is very different of the American one. It is useless, as many foreigners living in Chine can explain.

    4. Re: No green cards, No ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that hard to believe unless this is your first post of the day.

    5. Re: No green cards, No ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded!

      Didn't that post come across like something off a Magic-8 Ball? "Concentrate and ask again". "You may rely on it". "Try to think logically"....

    6. Re:No green cards, No ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can own property. Who told you you couldn't. You probably can't get a loan from a Chinese bank as you are too much of a flight risk. But tons of foreign people buy property in China.

  9. Umm, because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the country sucks?

  10. Do they need to? by ilsaloving · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, this is China. They just copy the talent they already have. :)

    *ducks and runs*

  11. Peer review!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys, I think it's time for some brownie theory.

  12. Is stackoverflow blocked? by FictionPimp · · Score: 4, Funny

    As long as stackoverflow isn't blocked I can still get everyone else to write my code, so I'm good!

    1. Re:Is stackoverflow blocked? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Stackoverflow uses JavaScript libraries hosted with a bad certificate or something, because posting doesn't work through a lot of firewalls. (I haven't checked lately, maybe they fixed it since.)

    2. Re:Is stackoverflow blocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its more likely that the "firewall" is performing a man in the middle attack which is properly being identified by the certificate infrastructure.

  13. You will always be a foreigner by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From what I heard it is impossible to be treated like one of them if you don't look Chinese, even if you speak perfect Mandarin, socialize and marry a local, etc...
    Permanent visas, let alone citizenship, are extremely difficult to get and some places don't accept foreigners.
    I suppose this gets on your nerves after some time.

    1. Re: You will always be a foreigner by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      That's true for every single country on the planet except America. You can live in France for 40 years, does that make you a Frenchman? If you live in Iran for 40 years, do you become Persian? And yet you live in Somalia your entire life, come to America and immediately granted refugee citizenship, bam you're American and anyone who says otherwise is a xenophobic racist America First asshole.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Higaran · · Score: 4, Informative

      That has always amazed me about other countries, I was born in Poland, but have grown up in the US from a very young age. When ever I go back to Poland, I only get treated by people I know closely like a local, but I consider myself an american. When every I go anywhere touristy I most people speak english to me before I've ever said a word. In the US after a few years you can become a citizen, in many other countries it takes generations, in the US everyone comes from somewhere else originally so it doesn't matter where you were from as long as you want to be and are a citizen now, I guess.

    3. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Did you even read beyond the comment title? You can get citizenship in France and any other Western country quite easily (well ok, maybe not the UK in the future). Discrimination on a cultural or ethnic basis is illegal in most of those places as well.

    4. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in a country of immigrants, an American who discriminates against them is a an asshole.

    5. Re: You will always be a foreigner by toadlife · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily "a few years" to become a citizen in the U.S. unless you have money, some special skill and/or you come from a country from which not very many people are seeking to come to the U.S..

      It can easily take decades for people from Central American countries to gain citizenship in the United States.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    6. Re:You will always be a foreigner by the+gnat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Veering slightly off-topic here, but in addition to what you said, the limitations on internal migration (for Chinese citizens) are absolutely insane by Western standards. Imagine that you couldn't attend school or obtain a driver's license or even legally reside in California despite being born there because your parents were "registered" as Illinois residents and moved without permission. As someone who rarely has to deal with any government agency more oppressive than the local DMV office, I can't imagine living in a country with that level of control over my life, even if they were handing out citizenship papers freely.

    7. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discrimination on a cultural or ethnic basis is illegal in most of those places as well.

      Same with the US, but apparently we have a "problem" with it. Probably because it exists. Probably because you can't legislate someone not liking you because you're from Backwardfuckistan, and you won't stop them from acting on that dislike - not here in the US, nor in France.

      Good luck proving that was why you didn't get the job, or invited to the party, or the hawt native chick to date you.

      The point stands: you go to another country that isn't on a very, very short list - it doesn't matter how you acclimate or how long you spend there - you're a foreigner, forever.

    8. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? How fuckin' nationalistic are you? Canada, Britain, Denmark, Finland, Switzerland, Italy will accept you as a 'local' with little trouble if you actually WANT to act/be a local...on & on & on...now if you're an American going to some of those countries that may not be the case but that's because Americans are arrogant as you've demonstrated.

      And btw, if you are granted citizenship you ARE American you idiot. Try to get to know some of these people you hate so much. That doesn't mean you have to accept their culture or not want them to embrace the American one of 'baseball & apple pie' but that takes time. Hang out with them, invite them over for dinner or to watch a football game. Invite their kids to play with your kids etc. etc.

    9. Re:You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if Mickey Rooney could have ....

    10. Re: You will always be a foreigner by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I think that you are wrong about this.

      It can take decades to get a green card, but once you have a green card, it's just 5 years residence in the USA required before you can apply for citizenship. I don't think that the time to get US citizenship is particularly dependent on your country of origin, or current citizenship.

      Depending on who you are, or perhaps what day of the week you apply, you may find that the FBI takes more time to approve your application for citizenship. My wife's application went through in 6 months. Mine took 18 months. We come from the same country and applied for citizenship on the same day.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    11. Re: You will always be a foreigner by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      It is 5 years with a green card to get citizenship. Getting the green card can reasonably take another two years for marriage, employment, etc; the green card lottery is another matter.

      Most other countries require a very long time to get citizenship, although there are a few exceptions (Panama, St. Lucia, St. Kitts, Dominican Republic, etc).

    12. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true for every single country on the planet except America. You can live in France for 40 years, does that make you a Frenchman? If you live in Iran for 40 years, do you become Persian? And yet you live in Somalia your entire life, come to America and immediately granted refugee citizenship, bam you're American and anyone who says otherwise is a xenophobic racist America First asshole.

      You're obviously a privileged white boy. Because if you're anything but white, you will never be treated with the same level of respect as the white guys are. There will be exceptions of course, but have one hobby that goes against the stereotype and people will start going: "You sure you're black?".

    13. Re: You will always be a foreigner by khallow · · Score: 1

      but have one hobby that goes against the stereotype and people will start going: "You sure you're black?".

      Whew, that's some serious racism there.

    14. Re:You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I heard it is impossible to be treated like one of them if you don't look Chinese, even if you speak perfect Mandarin, socialize and marry a local, etc...
      Permanent visas, let alone citizenship, are extremely difficult to get and some places don't accept foreigners.
      I suppose this gets on your nerves after some time.

      As a non-white person in the USA, lol.

    15. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but have one hobby that goes against the stereotype and people will start going: "You sure you're black?".

      Whew, that's some serious racism there.

      Well, yeah. Because if you're not "black enough", some blacks in the US are some of the most racist people around. And that's not even getting to the "hate whitey" blacks.

      You need to get out more.

    16. Re:You will always be a foreigner by TheSync · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed, China has 1,448 naturalised Chinese in total. Almost no foreigners are able to become citizens.

      Even Japan, better known for hostility to immigration, naturalises around 10,000 new citizens each year; in America the figure is some 700,000.

    17. Re: You will always be a foreigner by TheSync · · Score: 1

      If you are an American living and working legally in France for five years, or you are married to or were born to a French citizen, you may apply for French citizenship.

      If youâ(TM)ve successfully completed two years of higher education in France, the five-year residency period can be reduced to two years.

    18. Re:You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have seen all the shanty towns around Beijing and Shanghai ? Like all the other developing countries. No you missed them? Because China doesn't let people with no reason move to already crowded and overpopulated cities. Why should residents of a city pay taxes for their schools so you can come from somewhere else and free ride on their system? Of course you can legally reside in most places, then find work and apply for registration in that city after a couple years. You just get schooling and hospital benefits from the place you were born to, it's not all that hard to change if you are willing to work for it. Lots of cities encourage it, if you are a graduate they will pay you a relocation allowance. I suppose you think everyone in America should just move to New York have no job and live in cardboard boxes while they send their kids to free schools?

    19. Re: You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'When every I go anywhere touristy I most people speak english to me before I've ever said a word."

      It's the checked trousers champ, they're a dead giveaway.

    20. Re: You will always be a foreigner by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Getting the green card can reasonably take another two years for marriage, employment, etc;

      Depending on current nationality. I think that they are currently processing green card applications from about 2005 for Indian nationals.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    21. Re:You will always be a foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because China doesn't have the biggest migration on the planet every New Year for all the people traveling back to their hometowns. Since they were never allowed to leave in the first place...
      You knowledge of China is laughable, as is the people who modded you up. How could you not know about the hundreds of millions of migrant workers working in different cities to which they were born? You think they are all illegals? Just waiting for the Commies to round them up like Mexicans?

    22. Re: You will always be a foreigner by khallow · · Score: 1

      No, I mean that's pretty low grade for racism there. I get that kind of social pressure is bad, but it doesn't kill people or create a permanent underclass. But I'm sure you can think of stuff that does, even today.

    23. Re:You will always be a foreigner by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      From Wikipedia:

      "Since the 1980s, an estimated 200 million Chinese live outside their officially registered areas and under far less eligibility to education and government services, living therefore in a condition similar in many ways to that of illegal immigrants... There are around 130 million such home-staying children, living without their parents, as reported by Chinese researchers."

      Of course if the Chinese government was less secretive and obsessed with control, we could probably find more accurate statistics. But then this is the country that tried to discourage the US embassy in Beijing from posting accurate air pollution metrics because they were so embarrassing.

    24. Re: You will always be a foreigner by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      H1b to green card is a slow path; 7-10 years is about right.

  14. Dixie cups by tomhath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect the people being recruited are concerned that the goal is to transfer the expertise they have to Chinese engineers/scientists. Once that transfer is done the foreigner will no longer have any value.

    1. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived there. You are just a condom waiting to be discarded the moment u arrive. You are seen that way by any woman who gets with u too as soon as the money dries up. Ay its heart its a racist country like all Asian countries really.

    2. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pool of small-minded idiotic racists is not confined to any single country. Why bother thinking when it's easier just to label somebody on their appearance or apply a lazy stereotype.

    3. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Asian countries take racism to a different level even though they are all basically from the same racial group. The Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Korean (both north and south varieties), and all the other Asian racial sub-groups all hate each other. The sheer nuance of their racism is dumb founding when you consider skin color is not the primary means of identifying the various groups. And it would be one thing if you could blame the animosity totally on nationalism but their animosity for one another started centuries ago when most of the south east Asian nations didn't even exist.

      If the Chinese have problems with their government it is up to them to do something about it. China's central government is more afraid of it's citizens than the citizens are afraid of the government. China's leadership know they are balancing their power on the edge of a knife. The more prosperous the citizens become the more dangerous the general population becomes and the Chinese government economic policies cannot be turned back to keep the peasants hungry, barefoot, and down trodden which was Mao's legacy.

      And I have been lucky enough to travel around the world extensively as an American and I found the Chinese people to be the most welcoming and friendly. Although it could be that the Europeans I encountered in my travels were such total pricks across the board that they make the Chinese look like the open and socially accommodating country that the Europeans think they are. The US would be better off partnering up with China then putting up with the whiny Europeans whose last noteworthy contributions to the world was WW1 and WW2. China is probably one of the only countries on the planet that the US has never had a military conflict with. While the Japanese were rampaging across China in WW2 the US, who at the time was not considered a world military power, sent an all volunteer fighter squadron to harass the Japanese. It was a small contribution that didn't really make a military difference but the Chinese remember and even built a small war time museum honoring those US flight crews. They even had a display mentioning the US airmen who landed in China after the Dolittle raid. There would have most likely been no survivors of that raid if the airmen had not been helped by the Chinese living in the area at the time. Despite the press about tensions between the US and China over a few tiny islands, all of which could be destroyed with just a few cruise missiles, the two navies have held war games, conducted training for joint military humanitarian operations, and allowed Chinese sailors to come aboard US carriers to observe carrier operations they can use to train their sailors manning their carrier.

      The Chinese spy on the US and the US returns the favor because that is SOP for every country of note around the world. France and the Israelis conduct more espionage operations against the US than China does but there is no talk of the US gearing up to take action against those two countries. The US has treaties with China's neighbors that all but demand the US say certain things when those treaty partners feel threatened by anything China does. China knows this and they also no what the limits are. The last thing China would ever want is to get in a military conflict with the US. They have made great strides in modernizing their armed forces but they are still no where close to being able to go toe to toe with the US Navy especially when you include the Japanese and SK military forces surrounding China.

    4. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China sure as hell forgot about our help during that little Korean War when they backed up NK's glorious reader Kim Il Sung.

      When it looked like that NK's army was going to be decimated, the Chinese came out swinging...

    5. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't forget the Vietnam War!

    6. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your first para is quite ridiculous, and ironically enough, racist enough to be going on with. Europeans managed to hate each other enough to carry out wars and massacres for centuries even though they are 'basically from the same racial group'. All those folks in the Balkans can't tell each other apart by sight and even speak much the same language but so what, have at it! Racism is not the preserve of one or other group.

    7. Re: Dixie cups by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      It's a mistake to try and mix racism and rational thinking. They don't go together.

    8. Re: Dixie cups by ninthbit · · Score: 2

      I don't think China is a scared of the US as you think. They could crash our economy and throw us into turmoil in a second. Then, if military action is involved, they have so much established manufacturing and natural resources, they could ramp up like we did in WWII but faster and better. Not to mention, with Russia and N Korea just around the corner, they could easily establish partnerships that put the US at a lot of risk.

      To make matter worse, they have a huge population they can toss into a meat grinder of a conflict, while the US public will quickly turn against military action with groups like Mothers of America crying out about their kids being killed to protect the rich 1%'s interests.

      Then they're is Trump... that guy is just begging for an excuse to toss a nuke. His ego dictates that he have the gloating rights to say he was the first world leader since WWII to have the ball to toss one. If that kleptocrat doesn't partner with China to rob us blind, he'll start a war with them "to make Merica great again"

      China has nothing to fear, they own our debt and we've already outsourced all our manufacturing to them. They more a threat to us, then we are to them. I suspect they know this and are just smarter then previous governments. They know they don't' need to beat us in a military fight. They can just slowly buy the nation buy assuming all the debt and undermining the economy. Once it collapses, they call the debt and own America.

    9. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after they fight the war to conquer it. Do you really think any nation anywhere would give up its sovereignty through a monetary debt? (Hell no) Not to mention, who's going to make that nation do it if they refuse? The UN who sends out "soldiers" without ammunition?

      The only way that would happen would be through an armed invasion.

    10. Re: Dixie cups by erapert · · Score: 1

      You are just a condom waiting to be discarded the moment [you come in].

      Geez, why do I even have to fix this for you. I thought slashdotters were supposed to be smart.

    11. Re: Dixie cups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is probably one of the only countries on the planet that the US has never had a military conflict with.

      Apparently you've forgotten of the Korean War and the Boxer Rebellion.

      And it would be one thing if you could blame the animosity totally on nationalism but their animosity for one another started centuries ago when most of the south east Asian nations didn't even exist.

      You're mistaking the state for the nation. A nation is a group of people, defined by race, culture, or language, while a state is a government controlling a certain territory. While the current governments of Asia are almost all less than a century old, their cultures extend back millennia, and there have been countless causes for distrust in that time. For example, China dates back only to 1949, but the people there still generally hate Mongolians for the invasions 800 years ago, despite the fact that the State that did that is long dead and buried.

    12. Re: Dixie cups by helpfulcorn · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as "call[ing in] the debt", that's far-right, paranoid nonsense. Debt is bought through bonds, it's like saying you're calling in Google's debt to you by putting your stock up for sell on etrade or whatever. What you're suggesting is essentially the same as saying you own 10% of Google's stock (how much US debt China owns) and so you selling it all at once will make you "own" Google.

      While it will drive the price down for sure, it will make you look desperate for money, and even if it did hurt the US in some way, it'd be way worse for China. You don't exactly look stable by saying "sell! sell! sell!" on your bonds which mean more to you than to the country you invested in.

      90% of US debt is not owned by China. Also, they are really god awful at organising their huge society. WWII in the US was a different story, where people who largely already had some connection to, or lived near, factories could get jobs in them for the war effort. The factories also already existed as well. With China much of the population is still rural, not any better off or more educated than they were 50 years ago, and live no where near any factories. What you're talking about is pure fantasy dreamed up by people who have no idea what US debt even is.

      If they really wanted to destroy the US economy, or hurt it very badly, all they would have to do is raise the price of trade. They artificially keep their currency low against the USD to help encourage trade and the US is extremely dependent on trade with China, far more than bonds.

  15. I thought it was the language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that you can't get a permanent visa, and the air quality, and the manners, but mostly the language. If the way Chinese speak and write English is any indication, Mandarin isn't an expressive language.

  16. If I had one wish this holiday season... by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 2

    1. People don't like to move.
    2. People especially don't like to move someplace far away.
    3. People especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country.
    4. People especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.
    5. People especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution.

    To me, that seems like that should be enough reasons. But okay, sure:

    6. People especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to.

    1. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by David_Hart · · Score: 0

      1. People don't like to move.

      2. People especially don't like to move someplace far away.

      3. People especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country.

      4. People especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.

      5. People especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution.

      To me, that seems like that should be enough reasons. But okay, sure:

      6. People especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to.

      7. People especially especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to AND you can get thrown in Jail for no reason at all and left to rot until you die...

    2. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND you can't get porn

    3. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why the US and Canada are overflowing with Chinese, Japanese, East Indians, and many other cultures. Because people don't like to move. Fucking moron.

    4. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by gmack · · Score: 1

      1. People don't like to move. 2. People especially don't like to move someplace far away. 3. People especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country. 4. People especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture. 5. People especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution.

      To me, that seems like that should be enough reasons. But okay, sure:

      6. People especially especially especially especially especially don't like to move someplace far away in another country where they don't speak the language and they have a completely different cuisine and culture.and where you have to live in a tiny apartment in an overcrowded city with really bad air pollution AND the government won't let you go to all the internet sites you might want to.

      You don't have an actual point until #5. For 1-4 Speak for yourself. Many people like to experience other places and cultures and foods. And I know people who change jobs and countries every few years just for the enjoyment of trying something new.

      Not everyone is boring.

    5. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 1, Troll

      You don't have an actual point until #5. For 1-4 Speak for yourself. Many people like to experience other places and cultures and foods. And I know people who change jobs and countries every few years just for the enjoyment of trying something new.

      Not everyone is boring.

      Sure. But most people are. That's what makes them boring, if you think about it. If everybody was a thrill-seeker, it's the homebodies who would be the exciting and exotic ones.

      Mind blown, right?

    6. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by Pseudonymous+Powers · · Score: 2

      That explains why the US and Canada are overflowing with Chinese, Japanese, East Indians, and many other cultures. Because people don't like to move. Fucking moron.

      Cool, so you can help me move this weekend?

    7. Re: If I had one wish this holiday season... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Good news, in China you don't need to speak the language or anything. Computer translation makes learning Chinese a quaint oddity. Moreover in Beijing you can live quite comfortably inside foreign enclaves. Much like Chinese in America live among their own people and never mix with the locals. It's easy, just spend your time browsing facebook, playing Xbox and watching Netflix. Just like life back home.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re: If I had one wish this holiday season... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you talking about USA?

    9. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why the US and Canada are overflowing with Chinese, Japanese, East Indians, and many other cultures. Because people don't like to move. Fucking moron.

      Well yeah, people don't like to move...unless it's to someplace much better than where they previously were.

    10. Re:If I had one wish this holiday season... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People really don't want to move to a country they know they will never be real citizens. They have no rights. They need a Chinese spouse with hard cold Chinese cash to take care after them. They can't own property. They will be aliens even if they master better Chinese than most Chinese citizens. They will be treated as children there. When you master Chinese language it's not pretty when you learn what they say in public. They are very direct and say all their thoughts publicly.

  17. Because living in China is a nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No sane person would subject him- or herself to living under an authoritarian regime with little freedom of speech, which is horribly overcrowded, and where breathing the air can literally kill you, where the food is generally horrendous, where grown adults spit all over the place, and where children have slits cut into the crotches of their pants so they can piss and shit in the street. (And no, I am not kidding about that last one. Look it up.)

    I spent six weeks backpacking China in 2006 and it was an absolute nightmare. I imagine it's worse now that the pollution is truly out of control.

    Hong Kong is good. Taiwan is good. Mainland China is a nightmare. (Shanghai is not the worst place on earth either. But that's only because the rest of China *is* the worst place on earth.)

    1. Re:Because living in China is a nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where, pray tell, were you in China? The urinating and defecating in the streets is very difficult to believe except perhaps in the rural parts of the country. If you're in the major cities, that is not going to happen.

      I have my doubts China will ever become a first world country but your comment that the rest of China is the worst place on earth is just a blatant lie. I can think of many places far worse to be than China. Almost all of Africa, for example. Or if we stay in East Asia, North Korea.

    2. Re:Because living in China is a nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have done substantial travelling. China is the only country I have ever been to that was completely and utterly intolerable. (Of course there are worse places; "worst place on earth" is hyperbole.)

      The shitting and pissing on the street was observed even in Shanghai. Shitting was much rarer (only caught one or two of those), but it was easy to find kids with crotchless pants pissing on the street in most cities. At least the piss does the job of washing away all the polluted phlegm that the locals hack up onto the street. Takes you back to those pre-plumbing days of Europe that you read about where people were just emptying chamber pots out of windows.

      Supposedly the government started to crack down on the spitting and shitting and pissing in around 2008 (after I was there) so they could attempt to look civilized for the Olympics. (At the same time they were evicting people from their homes to build infrastructure and then arresting them when they complained.)

      It's a truly awful place.

      Trump is going to destroy America and probably the planet, but at least he won't take crap from China, and he may open up relations with Taiwan (which is NOT awful).

  18. It's complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You assume American talent goes to China, but that is confused.

    They can hire in the US to work in the US. Why move their office to China, why not just export the end profit?
    They can hire non US talent to work in (best place for that person). Why move foreign talent?
    They can hire non US talent to China for cases where China is a better option.
    Would you work in Hong Kong for DJI?? I bet you would. Some Chinese companies are world class, whatever you situation you move to work for the leader in a field.

    It's just more complicated that this confusion between work location and main employers country.

    Obama's legacy: EU was the largest trading block in the world, far bigger than NAFTA just after Bush. After Obama, USA is the largest trading block in the world, even without the rest of NAFTA. A competent leader returns a successful trading block.

    Meanwhile back in Trumpalumpa land, he's still planning "commander in chief perfume".

    1. Re:It's complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advocatus diaboli: If Orange is smart enough to get Russia into a trading bloc without doing an agreement that reeks of what the Corps Diplomatique Terrestrienne would do, it might mean a lot of good now and in the future. Of course, I don't really have my hopes up...

  19. Omnity & Jupyter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder if Omnity and Jupyter is blocked?

    https://www.omnity.io/

    http://jupyter.org/

  20. Freedom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the government can't survive while still allowing the society to be free, I see no reason whatsoever in providing my services to said government, especially if in doing so I have to live in the very society that is NOT free.

  21. Lol no, that's not it by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    The very first thing I ask myself when I apply to a new IT position is "can I breathe the air and drink the water in that city?"
    In China, that answer is no. Also you'll get arrested for doing basically anything. That's a bit of a downside as well.

  22. in US too by Frederic54 · · Score: 2

    I worked for a US company, as a software developper, that decided to block all the "shareware" "freeware" open source" and al websites, so we had no access to github, stack overflow, forums or anything interesting for developpers. We had to fight HR (it seems HR head had the decision to unblock site, try to explain what open source is...) to access them. It was a true nightmare, they were control freak of the web. The number of times you did a search, click on the answer you were looking for and bam! blocked! We had bypass using different DNS or 3G on our phone, etc.

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:in US too by Shoten · · Score: 1

      I worked for a US company, as a software developper, that decided to block all the "shareware" "freeware" open source" and al websites, so we had no access to github, stack overflow, forums or anything interesting for developpers. We had to fight HR (it seems HR head had the decision to unblock site, try to explain what open source is...) to access them. It was a true nightmare, they were control freak of the web. The number of times you did a search, click on the answer you were looking for and bam! blocked!
      We had bypass using different DNS or 3G on our phone, etc.

      I think you fail to grasp the totality of it in China...and the implication of it being done by a government rather than simply an employer.

      For one thing, there's no amount of web surfing you could have possibly done at your job that would have gotten you in prison...short, that is, of going after child porn. But in China, people have been arrested for comments posted online, participation in certain groups, etc. And even without arrest, you have to worry about being under investigation.

      Then, consider the fact that the first two words of your post, "I worked," indicate that you could escape that inanity simply by changing jobs. In China, there's no place to go. Oh, and also...you wouldn't be able to get around it as simply as using a 3G phone or changing your DNS either. And simply trying to do so would have increased the risk of coming under scrutiny.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    2. Re:in US too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DNS based blocking? Yeah the IT team was well aware of what they were doing. Anyone that wants to get around the bullshit just needs to manually configure a public DNS server. Just high enough of a barrier that HR wouldn't know the difference and people that knew how would know to keep their mouth shut.

  23. What FREEDOM means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daily life in China is freer than in the USA only because the government in China lacks the resources to apply its oppression more pervasively; freedom is the ability of the common man to evade or resist imposition.

    1. Re:What FREEDOM means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freedom is the ability of the common man to evade or resist imposition

      Which makes China by default less free than the US.

      The NSA being all up in your kinky business is far less of an imposition than blocking websites.

      'course, if you live under the tyranny of an HOA, chances are, you're imposed upon on a daily basis even worse than the most reprehensible regime of evil.

    2. Re: What FREEDOM means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOA, yeah, my kinky business is my fuxking ham radio antennas!!

    3. Re:What FREEDOM means by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Daily life in China is freer than in the USA only because the government in China lacks the resources to apply its oppression more pervasively; freedom is the ability of the common man to evade or resist imposition.

      "Wrong!!"
      Communism as it was with Stalen or Mao is history. Communism today is a one party system, with opposition, with debates on capital expenditures, studies and planning infrastructures, and maintaining a competitive standard of living for the well educated. You rarely hear of senior Chinese wanting to leave. Why should they? They have a good education system, universal medicare, good pension and vacation plans, job security, time off to both parents for the first months of newborn babies. They can open businesses, make profits, and do very well.

      So what does the USA offer? Everything you need to have, you have to pay through the nose to get. From education, to medicare to job insecurity. Who lives a more stressful life?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    4. Re:What FREEDOM means by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the US has enough to offer that many wealthy leave China and open up "Chinese" restraunts all over, as well as the birth tourism of the welathy Chinese.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

      But I guess you know more than all those Chinese looking for a better life in the US.

      http://www.migrationpolicy.org...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  24. Wrong asumptions by franzrogar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Quote: "The biggest problem is government control of the internet."

    WRONG! (properly capitalized)

    The biggest problem is that China is a country with a dictatorship and that shit in Human Rights.

    (Real) example: I'm gay. If I go there to work I'm not allowed to live (if I go to the street and kiss my couple, or even f**k at home, both get killed and the Government send the bullets bill to our families).

  25. What is the attraction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is not at the forefront of anything. They're in the middle of the 21st century version of the Industrial Revolution with all the social instability that creates. So if you like reinventing the wheel (which is essentially what they are doing) you can go to China.

  26. Your Mileage May Vary by Shoten · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are, as described above, many reasons...but I think the "main" reason for any particular person will depend upon the person.

    I was once contacted by Huawei about becoming an executive at their organization, in Beijing. Now..this is curious to me since I neither speak Mandarin nor Cantonese. I find it hard to imagine that I would make a very effective VP in a technical role, without even a basic conversational grasp of their language. (And don't even think about reading...)

    However, interestingly enough, I also have a background in doing cyber security for the military in which role I got access to quite a lot of things. So...yeah. NO WAY was I going to entertain the job offer, for even a millisecond.

    But you know what? Even without that creepiness, I wouldn't have considered it because of the air pollution. I can't imagine exercising outdoors in a place where the air is so filthy you can taste it. Hell no.

    For some people, a reason not to go would be the culture shock...but for me, that's actually a plus. Or maybe the food? Nope...I love exploring new cuisines, and have always been fantastically happy getting authentic local food in any country I've visited. The crowding? Uh uh...I'm a hardcore urbanite. But for some others, these would be downsides instead of upsides...it all depends on the person.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    1. Re:Your Mileage May Vary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >......it all depends on the person.

          You are savvy enough to realize why you were being entertained at all. Others may not catch on and be literally flattered that a company would be willing to invest in them, hire them, teach them something too. All the while unbeknownst they're being exploited. So while you're right, it does depend on the person... it's more likely it depends on the TYPE of person: and an ego-centric, easily flattered, self-identified international playboy, rube with possibly certain addictions does fit your description nicely.

      You dodged it and we appreciate that :)

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:See how China solved "fake news"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was that Truth?
    Politicians are Ruthless?
    Pizza is made from babies?

    China has Government Mandated Fake News.

  29. A columnist at Bloomberg tries to convince us* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China will own the 21st century, despite whatever futile attempts the U.S. tries. The writing's been on the wall for a decade at least, and the country becomes more and more attractive each year that goes by. You can't stop change with BS articles, period.

  30. Thankfully by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Thankfully I remembered to download the entire Internet to a blank CD before I left for Chin++++NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Thankfully by slew · · Score: 1

      Thankfully I remembered to download the entire Internet to a blank CD before I left for Chin++++NO CARRIER

      Don't laugh, but didn't I hear that Google's doing something like that for Cuba? ;^)

  31. Fuck China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck China.

    CAPTCHA: tyranny

  32. What about developing in the cloud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know - vpn to your dev servers and work? You can even do windows pc's in the cloud if you want. Compile your shit and bring it local if you need that for some reason. Bet you could even set up your own vcs service, vpn in and sync from that to your local overnight or something.

  33. That communist dictatorship thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, 'poor access to the internet' THAT's the reason why China can't attract foreign scholars....perhaps being a communist dictatorship might have just a LITTLE more to do with this than the difficulty using the internet. The latter is simply a symptom. I might go visit China some day but you couldn't pay me enough to live there.

    This is what we get when you 'normalize' trade with a country like China, low level excuses for why its not a good place to live. We have to stop pretending that everything is 'A ok'. The Chinese government controls far more than the Internet, we need to call them out for what they are, if & when they give their people real freedom then we can get back to things like the internet to worry about.

  34. USA grad programs benefit both China and USA by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    As the subject suggests both the US and China benefit from Chinese students in Ph. D. programs in US universities. US Ph. D. programs in the hard sciences (chemistry, physics, etc.) and the various engineering disciplines are stocked with Chinese nationals on student visas. These graduates go back to China and either work for government agencies or as university faculty. Those who graduate from elite US universities end up at elite China universities. Their non-resident tuition in US public schools will likely be paid by China. All this benefits the US universities because of the free labor provided to the professoriate at the US schools in programs hard pressed to get highly qualified grad students. And of course these grads take with them all that knowledge and experience needed to extend it in China even though they may be limited in keeping up with progress in other countries. Then again, the Internet isn't the only source of information which includes, among other things, technical journals and international conferences.

    It would be interesting to know how repatriated graduates of US and European universities feel about the restrictions imposed in China on their access to the kinds of information they had easy access to in the west and how it affects their ability in creating new results.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:USA grad programs benefit both China and USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get them out of the USA! That is what the Trump Presidency is about.

    2. Re:USA grad programs benefit both China and USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are hundreds of tech grad school programs that include many students from China and India. Only a few, naturally, are top schools, while some are barely credible institutions of higher learning. The value of these programs overall is not about any research benefit - that's just a tendentious, a priori hypothesis; the value is about money being pumped into American Colleges and Universities. A lot of these institutions couldn't even hire more than 3 or 4 CS professors, if the money and demand from foreign students wasn't there. A lot of these institutions really shouldn't presume to issue graduate degrees.

      For the foreign students themselves, the value is in a J-1 visa, followed by an H-1b, followed by a Green Card. Graduates of these programs spam US companies in a bid to find a job in the U.S.

      Study a few tens of thousands of resumes, and the patterns are ridiculously obvious.

  35. The fuck... by Jawnn · · Score: 1

    kind of stupid question is that? Totalitarian, violently oppressive, culturally backwards, and an environmental shithole. What person with "tech talent" would be attracted to that?

    1. Re:The fuck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My European friends ask me the same when I take jobs in the US.

    2. Re:The fuck... by flood78 · · Score: 1

      That's not really a stupid question but the right question here is "why coming to a technology environment shithole?" The thing is that is on the day to day, nothing of what you said is happening. That's what we always see in the news. You have to come here to see how it is. You can walk anywhere in Shanghai in the middle of the night, it's very safe. You can pretty much do anything you want and that's somewhat a nice freedom feeling. Doing business is available for foreigners and it's not difficult to start something and then make it official afterward. Attracting talent is one thing but keeping them is even harder. You have big companies paying high salaries that gets their employees fly away at the first occasion for a better salary. And it's all this paperwork for the Internet Police and the random censorship and rules changing anytime and multiple times that makes it difficult to do tech business. And always have to play with VPN is a big issue... it's annoying, frustrating and at some point make you think that you could be in Thailand or anywhere else.

  36. Dear China... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Want Tech talent? Pay in US dollars at 4X the rate of the highest paid tech job in the USA. Plus give us special status equal to your government officials that make us exempt from your laws like they are.

    Then you will get a lot of talent coming there, that would be enough for us to put up with the rampant bullshit we see coming from your companies in design failures and trying to work people to death.

    $2.2million per year paid in US dollars with a 20% increase yearly and a $20million balloon payout after 10 years. Plus all the Gong Bao Chicken I can eat.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  37. Idiotic Article by fullback · · Score: 1

    I've got rooms of PhD developers in Beijing, all of whom make almost Silicon Valley salaries, are smart enough to understand tunneling and VPN's like most everyone except maybe hairstylists and bicycle mechanics.

  38. Sooo by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

    PMI China isn't a chapter of the Project Management Institute... it is a use of the PMI license and part of the communist party... and is patrolled during meetings by the PLA. That is a significant discourager of talent.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

  39. Living there is a mixed bag by ukoda · · Score: 3, Informative

    I lived in China for 2 years and there is a lot to both like and hate.

    The good:
    - The people are generally nice, easy to get on with.
    - It is generally safe, I was never worried about where I went or when, within reason.
    - The food is good, once you learn the gotchas.
    - The electronics markets are the best in the world.

    The bad:
    - The Internet is truly horrible. I spent half my spare time curating VPNs to try and stay online. It is genuinely holding back China's tech sector. I was so glad when I returned home where the Internet just worked.
    - Bureaucracy is a pain, everything is way more complicated than it needs to be. It took me a full day to change the ownership of my car when I sold it and I mean a full day, not just a few hours. Back home this take less than 5 minutes.
    - Driving on China's roads is very stressful because of the lack of rule enforcement. I will never complain about drivers back home again.
    - Pollution can make you feel unwell, much like having a cold. This was only a problem in the big cities, in small cities it is low enough to not affect you directly.

    It has been a couple of years now since I lived there and from what I hear the Internet and pollution have both got worst since then.

    1. Re:Living there is a mixed bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are those food gotchas?

    2. Re:Living there is a mixed bag by ukoda · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't drink the local milk (it made me sick more than once), buy imported milk from the supermarkets that have imports, such as Metro. Be aware that frozen goods are not shipped in refrigerated trucks so have often thawed and refrozen, even with places like Metro. As a result ice cream was often found to be inedible. Bread, in the region I was in, is often sweetened and tastes terrible as a result, but normal bread can be found in speciality shops. Don't judge a restaurant by how fancy it looks, note which ones are popular with the locals. If dinning out with suppliers don't show interest in something you won't eat, they mistake you horror as desire and you will find it ordered for you. Likewise you will likely be offered the menu to make choices, it is a sign of respect but you only need to order a couple of things and leave the rest to them, just got for the safe choices you recognise and you can wing it for the rest of the meal.

  40. I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Furthermore I think one of the largest shortcomings in the USA/Europe's handling of China is the lack of 'enforcing the most conservative laws symmetrically.' The most direct example of this being that Chinese nations, neither directly nor indirectly should be allowed to own more than 49 percent of a company in foreign nations trading with China, unless China provides the same unrestricted ownership of corporations/companies inside of China itself.

    Most of the problems with the current globalization climate is high level operators either not looking at the full ramifications of different legal frameworks, or not caring, because they're being bribed/making enough that it doesn't matter to them short-term. The problem being that China has been viewing the long game for decades and the longer people let them play by some of their key rules, the weaker their greedy 'competitors' get on the international stage, with the endgame being British/European style colonialism under a 'final' Chinese colonization. Not unakin to what Russia did to Crimea decades ago and reaped the benefits of recently.

    1. Re:I agree. by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      The problem being that China has been viewing the long game for decades and the longer people let them play by some of their key rules,

      Keynes said, "In the long run we are all dead." Keynes is seen as the Moses of modern economic thought. This mentality explains quite a bit about US economic and business policy.

  41. ...because they jail innocent people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There have been several recent cases of China imprisoning Canadians for over a year, falsely accusing them of spying. It's hard to trust that the Chinese government/system won't turn against you.

  42. SMOG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People like to breathe.

  43. communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure i'd pack my bags for the communist Red China first chance I get.

  44. Is that by-design, though? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Programmers who can't take advantage of the sites and tools that make development a global effort are destined to write software customized solely for the Chinese market.

    Hmmmmmmmmm...

  45. Lure me. I can be lured. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus I have that Asian fetish.

  46. China does not need you by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    China has it own university students who then go on to create things and teach the next generation.
    If they want they can learn in the West and bring back ideas and concepts as they are been created in Western universities and think tanks, research labs.
    The Communist Party and mil does not need some foreigner wondering around for years asking questions, looking at things, learning about local issues.
    Not many people in the West have anything that China needs. If China sees a product or service it wants it has a few options:
    Buy the lab in the West and staff it with trusted staff in the West to extract the needed information.
    Surround the West's best academics with students who will bring the emerging skills back to China in real time.
    Invite the company into China and get a good understanding of the product, prototype and then produce it locally. Export the product to the world under a local brand.
    All that can be done in China with people the Communist party can trust.

    China is also aware of the skill sets of the CIA and MI6, well funded western NGO's backing protesters and dissidents.
    Why even risk a CIA or MI6, NGO front just to bring in a Western student or engineer with a great cover story who could then "travel" all over China and be a constant risk to China.
    No Western academic or staff has any skill that is worth that long term risk to China. Buy or get their tech in the West and if they really have to enter China then on very short term contracts, tours, visits.
    China was surrounded by the NSA and GCHQ (Demos-4, Little Sai Wan, Chum Hom Kok). Letting in Western teams will just allow ever more CIA and MI6 in to wonder around China making contacts, spying and collecting information. The spread of Western propaganda, support and funding for protesters, more spying is the only result. Any student or academic in the West can have their skills bought or accessed in the West and China can then access the same advancements as needed. No risk, no issues, no foreigners wondering around spying and making contacts for years.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  47. bolanren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if Github wasn't a protecting socialists at fault, then it wouldn't be blocked in based China.

  48. Bloomberg.com is censored by flood78 · · Score: 1

    Yay, bloomberg.com is censored. No news, no problems, everything fine within the wall

  49. 50Mbit/s connection in China by waltew · · Score: 1

    I'm using a 50Mbit/s connection writing this in China. Slashdot worked on the third reload and I'm usually struggling to watch video online. Websites inside China work well, everything outside is painstakingly slow. China has their own self-contained internet, most of my usual websites need vpn.

  50. nO cHINA JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I salute you sir, for your patriotism. They are looking for egoistic and selfish Americans to sell the trade secrets and eventually to own America without firing a single shot.

  51. Problems by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

    "The biggest problem is government control of the internet."

    Another problem is that Mainland China is a yawning shit-hole on the ass of the planet.

  52. Government / central control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's too bad. China as a country has many promising aspects. They are a hard-working people and value education highly. It's too bad that an oppressive government locks down the internet so that people can't get much work done. Oh well.

  53. Totalitarianism regime by NewYork · · Score: 1

    China is a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism regime
    Thinking out-of-the-box is prohibited.

  54. Here's your chance commie lovers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get the fuck out of here and discover what truly corrupt government is. Thanks to assholes like you, Cunton, and Obama, we're not far behind.