Slashdot Mirror


LG Is Abandoning the Modular Smartphone Idea (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: LG's modular phone accessory strategy that served as the primary differentiator for last year's G5 smartphone appears to be no more. The Wall Street Journal reports that the South Korean company is pivoting away from the plug-in "Friends" modules for the upcoming G6 device after lackluster sales for the G5. Per The Wall Street Journal, an LG spokesperson commented that consumers aren't interested in modular phones. The company instead is planning to focus on functionality and design aspects for the upcoming G6, which Chief Technologist Skott Ahn says will be released "in the very near future." According to the WSJ, the LG G6 will arrive "in the very near future," which suggests the phone will launch at Mobile World Congress next month.

78 comments

  1. Nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And zero people were surprised by this. Only a tiny minirity nerds were ever wanking their micropeens over modular phones. Even Google finally woke up to the idea being stupid and not commercially viable.

    1. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by slaker · · Score: 2

      As long as they don't abandon the construction techniques or baseline selling points of the existing G3/4/5, I don't care about modularity, although if I was in the right place in my phone lifecycle to get a G5, I definitely would have.

      LG is the only company making a flagship phone with a removable battery and a card reader. Being able to swap a battery after shooting a lot of photos or video is infinitely better than being tethered to an external battery, and moving cards around has obvious benefits as well.

      But the G3/4/5 are also held together with actual screws. You don't have to delaminate any glass. You don't need suction cups or special pry tools to fix one. I can completely field strip one to its components in about 90 seconds. This is a huge selling point, especially after some of the bullshit I've had to do to work on newer Apple and Samsung phones.

      As long as the G6 keeps those aspects, it's all good.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    2. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody was surprised because LG has an extensive history of abandoning products. I own two of LG's past "flagship" phones. Both of them received a single minor OS update and were promptly forgotten mere months from their releases.

    3. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The user-replaceable battery and card reader were why I wanted an LG V20, and the only reason I didn't get one is because they didn't sell the phone in the UK.

    4. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except you should not forget how LG is treating users with the boot loop defect. The G4 suffers from an internal defect on the main board that causes a bricked phone that will only boot briefly before it resets. It takes anywhere from days to many months to appear, usually when the phone is hot.

      LG acknowledges the problem, but refuses to fix it for any phone outside of the 12 month warranty, even though it is a design defect.

      That is like Ford refusing to recall cars with bad airbags because they are more than a year old. LG wants YOU to pay for their mistake.

      NEVER BUY LG.

    5. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a G3 over a G4. I got much cheaper, unlocked and it's at least as powerful as the G4

    6. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by slaker · · Score: 2

      I've not experienced this issue. At the same time, LG is also the only company making a phone with hardware that works the way all smartphone hardware should. I don't believe the matter is "never buy LG" but "don't buy any smartphone that doesn't at least have a removable battery and an SD card reader" and that doesn't leave us with very many options, does it?

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    7. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      That is like Ford refusing to recall cars with bad airbags because they are more than a year old.

      No it's not. One can result in death. The other results in annoyance.

      YOU to pay for their mistake.

      I'm confused. Isn't that how warranties work? They pay for manufacturer defects within the given time period, and not outside of the time period. I can't think of any faulty product I've owned where the manufacturer has gone outside of the warranty.

      In fact, my 2011 Honda Civic just had it's transmission how bad at 95k miles. It's $4.4k to replace, one year out of warranty. Honda isn't paying.

    8. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modularity is one of those things that engineers love but normal people just don't care about at all.

      The main issue is that for normal use you end up juts adding the modules you want and never changing them unless you upgrade to add a new fature. And in practice it's cheaper to just solder the superset together on a PCB.

      There's a similar problem with removable storage. It sounds like a good idea but in practice most people would be more satisfied if they juts soldered the largest commonly availabe card's worth of storage onto the board.

    9. Re:Nothing of value was lost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an LG G4 which failed in the above manner, exactly 1 week after warranty ended.

      I called them up, and they fixed it, free.

      Maybe if you call them, they will be willing to do it. *shrug*

      My next phone has a pretty good chance of being from LG as well. We shall see. :)

  2. quality by phantomfive · · Score: 1, Redundant

    This is anecdotal, but I've never used an LG product that worked well. From their washing machines to their phones, there was always something wonky.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:quality by rdelsambuco · · Score: 0
      That's fascinating, because - anecdotally - I've never used an LG product that didn't work very, particularly their washing machines and phone.

      Go figure!

      --
      I comment occasionally so that I can mod others -1 overrated or -1 offtopic.
    2. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second that, quite pleased with their products. Bothered to check the Consumer Reports rating?

    3. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us remember the well-deserved reputation Lucky Goldstar electronics had. Well, they shortened their name to LG but didn't improve the quality enough.

    4. Re:quality by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they have really good marketing, that's for sure.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also anecdotally, I had an LG Incite phone that was a horrible piece of crap. After having HTC and a couple of Samsungs, I recently bought a LG V10 and it's a great phone. At least as good as a Samsung, except with a user replaceable battery.

    6. Re:quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      I would have accepted a modular product, if there was a plan to support the product for 15 years, but the vast majority of the time, computer standards change for damned reason other than to not license the first-movers tech. As much as I hate non-upgradability/non-removable storage/battery/ram/cpu etc in computer devices, this is something that has NEVER EVER changed since the 80's. If you want the broadest adoption possible of anything from phones to game consoles, every feature must be built into the device, and anything worth upgrading has to justify replacing the entire device.

      To give a very old example, the original NES, a 6502-based 8-bit computer was a lot more "computer" in Japan than it was here, where none of the computer accessories were brought over (particularly the disk drive, tape drive and keyboard/BASIC unit), the SNES has a backwards compatibility NES mode, but because the cartridge slot is different, it's never accessible, and likely was never completely taped-out in the PPU. The JP SNES also supported a bunch of fun accessories that were never released in the US. Now had all this stuff been standard equipment the machine would have costed thousands of dollars.

      So the line is often drawn between what is sensible. This is how LG could have saved it, or even ruled the smartphone industry:
      - Divide the phone into three pieces, Heart (CPU/RAM), Storage/Battery, and Screen/Buttons/Cameras. When assembled it resembles a thin sandwich.
      - If people want a longer-lasting/larger-storage phone (both tend to go together) you remove two screws securing the battery/storage module from the phone, slide it down (to keep a water-tight seal) the inside of that side of the phone would have something resembling a M.2 connector for the storage and a USB-C style internal connector for the power (which normally passes-through to the USB-C port on the battery portion of the unit), the device would be inoperable without the back. This would also allow the same Heart/Screen part of the device to be used with similar devices like Camera bodies that have their own storage/battery system.
      - If people want instead a larger screen, or a "hardware keyboard" style interface, they could buy a larger model, remove the two screws from the front securing the screen, slide it off, and put a larger screen on and still fit into the original smaller Heart board side.
      - If people instead want something closer to a full-featured computer in a cell phone shape, they could replace the Heart board every two years and not have to waste money on new storage/screens

      But all of this would have doubled, if not tripled the cost of the device. Most "modular" attempts instead try to remove features that people want and replace it with other features people also don't want (eg replace the camera with a speaker... what? why?)

      But phone makers are too busy not adopting others standards that nobody wants to standardize on a "universal mobile phone body" to make a modular system work. Guess everyone will have to settle for dumping 30 accessories on a "wireless charging mat" and hoping that they all last more than an hour in use with their individual tiny batteries, instead of, oh plugging everything into a USB-C power delivery/3.1 hub, which then creates a rats nest of wires to break.

      True thing, I lent earphones so someone could watch something on a camcorder, they forgot the earphones were in their ears and got up from the table and dragged it away, pulling it out of their ears and smashing to the floor. If there is any justification for wireless earphones, it is this (monitoring earphones.) Otherwise the vast majority of the time (eg long use) wired headphones are preferred. When you have "modular" devices, you can often fix or replace a damaged module, which is a much better selling point. But think about how many devices are damaged just from falling every year. I've seen many people with cracked screens and they still insist on using the phone despite that being a high risk to cutting themselves.

    7. Re: quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anecdotally, I'm happy with the 37" tv I bought from them like 7 years ago that still works.

    8. Re:quality by murdocj · · Score: 1

      That's fascinating, because - anecdotally - I've never used an LG product that didn't work very, particularly their washing machines and phone.

      Go figure!

      Same here: I bought an LG phone because other LG products I had bought worked quite well. G

    9. Re:quality by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Same - I love my LG Urbane and am looking at LG for my next phone.

      I was a long time Samsung phone buyer but they are making it harder and harder to unlock their phones. Too bad because I love their cameras

  3. My favorite modular phone feature is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It puzzles me that so many expensive premium phones expoxy in the battery so that while the elaborate design, glass, aluminum, and top spec cpu/ram would last 5 years easily, the phone is near useless at 2 years.

    Even more baffling is some of the modular phones STILL have an expoxied battery... wtf. Like some music amp module is more useful than a fresh charged battery.

    1. Re: My favorite modular phone feature is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for real you get a 2ghz cpu 3-4 gigs of ram and 128gigs of space in a phone the only modular part needed is the battrry. the buttons and maybe casing would wear out before you "needed" to replace it as long as you get update security etc or have a roling release system looking at google though mostly at the provider att verison etc.

    2. Re: My favorite modular phone feature is by prefec2 · · Score: 2

      As long as there is no law forcing them to make batteries easy to change and available for 10 years, they will not.

    3. Re:My favorite modular phone feature is by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      It puzzles me that so many expensive premium phones expoxy in the battery...

      Because glue takes up a lot less space than removable fasteners. It's the same thing that makes laptop screens such a monumental pain in the arse to work on. Next question?

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  4. Duh LG by Master5000 · · Score: 0

    Who would've thought? A bad idea that doesn't sell and they drop it. The first rational decision in years at LG.

  5. Never had a chance... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hate to say it, but a bad idea in search of a problem...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Never had a chance... by Chalnoth · · Score: 1

      Yup. It sounds really cool on paper, but just doesn't fit well with the form factor of a mobile phone.

    2. Re:Never had a chance... by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 2

      The idea of modular phones or computers, where customers are expected to purchase proprietary modules to change their setup or just to upgrade, has been around since the dawn of the PC. Back in the 80's Byte magazine was filled with ads from computer manufacturers that claimed that you never had to buy a new computer, just swap out their custom (and therefore expensive) modules. Those manufacturers are, of course, not around any longer. It isn't possible to implement something like this without increasing size and manufacturing costs. *Every* time this idea gets flouted it fails miserably, but companies don't appear to learn from the past.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is one reason I got a G5. Not for the modular per se. I got it so when the USB port dies (one reason I get a new phone) I can fine a broken G5, take the batter/USB 'dock' off and put it on my phone.

      I do admit to using the excuse of bad USB port to upgrade to a faster phone in the past, but I think we are getting to a plateau of speed on phones. For general usage I have a feeling I'm going to have this one awhile.

    4. Re: Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "proprietary" part may have been the problem there, not the "modular" bit. Also, a smartphone is a luxury item, not really a computing device. Who would spend more on an upgrade-able phone when you can replace your cheaper one in two years for the same price?

    5. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought one of these... not because of the modularity per se, but because it had a removable battery. That's quite the rarity nowadays, and one feature I really value after my Nexus 6 had a battery failure just after the warranty period. I don't suppose LG would so kindly keep that feature in the G6?

    6. Re:Never had a chance... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      While I think modular phones wont make it because consumer choice costs more there are certainly problems being addressed in making phones modular.

      While I realize using myself only provides andicdotal evidense I'm going to do it anyways. I dont care about literally anything phone companies are pushing right now. I dont care how thick my phone is, if it's less than an inch it's fine. I dont care how powerfull my phone is, while I'm a power oriented PC user such things are irrelevant for me on phones, my S4 had all the power i needed and was only replaced because it died.

      As far as smart phones go, I only care about battery life and a built in keyboard (which literally, no one seems to offer anymore) nowadays. Everything else is garbage to me as its done well enough by every entry to the market.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    7. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, because when I used to use a desktop PC, I upgraded it piece by piece, never a full PC at once. Worked fine for decades until I needed something portable and went to laptops.

      Hell, my current laptop has upgraded RAM modules, disk drive, CPU and GPU.

    8. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't they? All of LG's previous phones have user replaceable batteries.

    9. Re:Never had a chance... by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      I dont care about literally anything phone companies are pushing right now. I dont care how thick my phone is, if it's less than an inch it's fine. I dont care how powerfull my phone is

      That mostly describes me as well, but I would add updates! A removable battery would be a huge plus too.

      I know I could try rooting it and taking charge, but I really didn't want to mess with that and I wasn't sure whether to trust any instructions I found on the internet.

      I had given up on ever getting Marshmallow a few months ago. I almost even bought a new phone just for that, but mine is less than 2 years old and I like it (Droid Turbo).

      And lo and behold I looked at it yesterday and an update was available! Finally! Yes, I'm finally on 6.0.1.

      But updates will be a huge consideration the next time I get a new phone.

    10. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, my current laptop has upgraded RAM modules, disk drive, CPU and GPU.

      Nobody here believes you upgraded your laptop's GPU. Why would you lie about such a thing? Looser.

    11. Re:Never had a chance... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because when I used to use a desktop PC, I upgraded it piece by piece, never a full PC at once. Worked fine for decades

      I find the 'for decades' part of this hard to believe. The first new PC I bought was a 166MHz Pentium clone. Upgrading the CPU required a new motherboard, because newer chips ran at a different voltage. The new motherboard needed PC100 RAM, not PC66, so I also needed to upgrade the RAM. I kept the case, graphics card, hard disk, CD drive, and floppy, but it was effectively a new computer. The next upgrade required a new case (because you couldn't buy AT form-factor motherboards anymore) for the new motherboard. Again, the new CPU needed new RAM, so I was keeping the drives and GPU, but basically nothing else - I also had to replace my ISA NIC with a PCI one, because there were no ISA slots on the new motherboard. The motherboard upgrade after that kept the case, but the drives needed replacing (no IDE on the new motherboard, only SATA), as did the GPU (no AGP, only PCIe).

      The times when I did keep something from the old machine, aside from the case that thing quickly ended up being the bottleneck and was replaced shortly after. Eventually, I realised it was cheaper and less effort to just buy a new machine and demote the old one to some other purpose (often meaning giving it to someone else). The only reason for building my own machine now is when I want something that is too niche for any vendor to sell (e.g. the NAS / media centre box that I have running FreeBSD). For a mobile phone, the niche thing that I want is a minimum of 3-5 years of timely security updates for an Android phone and being able to build the hardware myself wouldn't really help there.

      Hell, my current laptop has upgraded RAM modules, disk drive, CPU and GPU.

      What laptop has an upgradeable CPU and GPU? The only ones I've seen that don't have both soldered onto the board qualify more as luggables than laptops.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you such a clueless idiot? Don't try to project your ignorance on to others, noob. This is Slashdot and most people here know that laptops with discrete GPUs are upgradeable.

    13. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a little kid if your first PC was a Pentium, so you lack experience. The first new PC I bought was an 8086. Over the years parts got upgraded, including motherboards on occasion. A motherboard is a component upgrade, not a whole new PC, so my statement stands.

      What laptop has an upgradeable CPU and GPU? The only ones I've seen that don't have both soldered onto the board qualify more as luggables than laptops.

      Most non-shit laptops have upgradeable CPUs and GPUs. Try learning about them before you talk shit.

    14. Re:Never had a chance... by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Hate to say it, but a bad idea in search of a problem...

      If quality phones were $30 or so, I would agree with you. But considering how absurdly expensive a quality phone is, modular parts would be fantastic. The problem here isn't in the concept, but rather in the execution.

      With my PC, I can easily replace:
      1) Memory
      2) Motherboard
      3) Power supply
      4) Storage
      5) Input devices
      6) Output devices
      7) CPU

      I would love to be able to cheaply and easily upgrade or replace the parts of my phone (or tablet) that have become obsolete (or have been damaged or destroyed) without having to buy an entirely new device. These things should all have pluggable interconnects to make replacement at least as easy as it is with a PC.

      Perhaps LG's designers have reached the limits of their abilities, but the concept is very good.

    15. Re:Never had a chance... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The first new PC I bought was an 8086. Over the years parts got upgraded, including motherboards on occasion. A motherboard is a component upgrade, not a whole new PC, so my statement stands

      My first PC was an 8086, which I upgraded with a NEC V30H, but no part of that system other than the ISA bus was standard and so it was basically impossible to upgrade beyond sticking a bit more RAM in. Motherboard form factors weren't standardised until the 486, so even keeping the case was usually impossible, and most 486s didn't come with sufficiently powerful power supplies to be upgraded to pentium.

      A motherboard is a component upgrade, not a whole new PC, so my statement stands.

      It is effectively a whole new PC is the new motherboard requires a new CPU, GPU, and RAM.

      Most non-shit laptops have upgradeable CPUs and GPUs

      Okay, name one.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Never had a chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first PC was an 8086, which I upgraded with a NEC V30H, but no part of that system other than the ISA bus was standard and so it was basically impossible to upgrade beyond sticking a bit more RAM in. Motherboard form factors weren't standardised until the 486, so even keeping the case was usually impossible, and most 486s didn't come with sufficiently powerful power supplies to be upgraded to pentium.

      I upgraded my 8086 video card from monochrome to CGA, then a 286 mobo+CPU with the same video card, same memory card + new SIMMs, same controller card, same chassis, same power supply, same monitor and same keyboard. Upgraded the CGA card to EGA. The next upgrade was a 386 mobo+CPU, with the same video card, same memory card, same SIMMs, same controller card, same chassis, same power supply, same monitor and same keyboard. The next upgrades were going from EGA to VGA, later adding an Ad Lib, later adding a mouse, later adding more RAM, later adding a CD-ROM drive and changing the chassis. This pattern continued for all the way through to an Athlon system. Each time was small, incremental upgrades. At no point in time did I ever buy a whole new PC.

      It is effectively a whole new PC is the new motherboard requires a new CPU, GPU, and RAM.

      Wrong, no computer has ever required all of those components to be upgraded at the same time. A new motherboard + new CPU is it. Same RAM and video card, which has been true for most computers. It's an upgrade, not a whole new PC.

      Okay, name one.

      Every single laptop over $1000 that isn't a Mac. If you've never heard of mobile CPUs or MXM, then you have no business around computers. My current laptop is an Alienware 17, CPU upgraded from an i7 4700MQ to an i7 4950HQ and GPU upgraded from a GTX 765M to a GTX 970M.

      So yeah, you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

  6. Sort of like 3D printers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another fad item hyped to galactic proportions... and the reality is such a letdown...

  7. I wanted a G5 ! - Could not find a demo of DAC ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really excited when i heard about the modular G5 - particularly the B&0 play module with the 32bit Sabre ES9028C2M DAC

    I have a large hires audio collection >2tb and it seemed perfect. I cycle a lot and don't like external DACS ( jitter and clunky cables )

    I live in Brisbane Australia. There are literally 10-15 phone shops on our city mall.

    I. Went. To. Every Single. One. and it was the same. Every. God. Damn. Time.

    They would have the phone in the corner. Not one staff member knew it was modular. No one had ever heard of the B&O DAC or the difference between a 16 and 24 bit DAC or even what a DAC was and why i would want one. Why was i listening to flac ? Why wouldnt I want streaming Mp3 and our ludicrous Data Bundle ?

    Facepalm.jpg - I lost a lot of hope in humanity that day.

  8. Re:I wanted a G5 ! - Could not find a demo of DAC by mrvan · · Score: 1

    If your hope in humanity was pinned on underpaid mall shop staffers knowing about DAC I think you had it coming :)

    I'm curious though, do you really hear/appreciate the sound quality while you're cycling? I can maybe understand it in an environment where you can concentrate on the music, but on a bike...?

  9. Their high end phones are fine by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    and their low end is serviceable. My coworker has been using an $600 LG for going on 5 years now. I've had one of their $150 phones for going on 2 years now and it's tolerable. It could get better signal, but then again it's a non-Band 12 T-Mobile phone. Not enough short range spectrum.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Their high end phones are fine by danomac · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine had a middle-of-the-pack LG phone, and it lasted six years. He finally replaced it because the physical back button on the phone wouldn't respond unless you pressed very hard on the button. If it wasn't for that, he'd probably still be using it.

  10. The big question by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

    Of course, the big question is: will they be smart enough to keep the user-replaceable battery?

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:The big question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is 2016. Why on Earth would you want a user-replaceable battery? You can buy those recharging bricks for next to nothing and most phone batteries last as long as the phone and if there is some kind of problem, most sealed phones can have their batteries replaced relatively easily.

  11. Modularity wasn't the problem by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea behind the G5 modularity is a good one but their implementation sucked.
    - It is a metal phone that looks plastic. What's the big idea? For phones, plastic is superior in almost all areas except look. LG got is backwards here.
    - Their flagship camera grip module is a failure. You couldn't even turn on the camera using the physical button, and the extra battery was so poorly managed that it is no better than a generic external battery pack.
    - Poor build quality, poor software, and LG doesn't have an especially good track records when it comes to reliability.
    - Not very developer-friendly (locked bootloader, root, etc...). Few people actually care about that but those who are interested in modular phones are more likely to be in this group.

    1. Re:Modularity wasn't the problem by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I never owned one, but I liked the idea. I almost got one, did a bunch of research, but went with the LG G4 instead. There were a couple of reasons why, and as you say the implementation was a bit lacking. I think if they kept at it and improved upon it, it could have been a big winner.

      #1: Mods. Where are they? How can I buy them? Scarcity. So far as I am aware there were 3, and you couldn't find them anywhere outside of your initial purchase.
      #2: The biggest and most useful is probably the most boring, that being a simple battery replacement. However they made it to be non hot-swapable. Meaning in order to use it you needed to turn off the phone, do the swap, then boot everything back up again. Just imagine if all you had to do was yank one out and slam a new one in. Sure you would need some small battery reserve hidden someplace, but it could have applied to all mods.
      #3: The other two, a camera and a speaker, were not enough of an improvement over what you already got, they needed more.
      #4: Due to design you lose some waterproofing which could scare some people, though probably not a whole lot you can do without size increases.

  12. Modular phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get Fairphone (https://www.fairphone.com)

  13. LG G3 died within 18 months, will not buy LG again by uriyan · · Score: 1

    Summary up front: off-topic, but -- I'd had strongly unsatisfactory experiences with LG G3 (D855) in terms of hardware reliability, accordingly I decided not to ever consider LG phones again.

    There were three significant malfunctions during the 1.5 years of the G3's life; two of them were supposedly use-related by practically indicative of bad design (never happened to the same user, me, with a different phone in over a decade); the third and final one was the main board dying.

    Since the first two failures occurred during travel out of the country where there was warranty, I had to go for the repair to a local repair shop; subsequently LG refused to honor their warranty on the motherboard, which means the phone was beyond economic repair after only 18 months of use.

  14. The problem is the half-measures. by aussersterne · · Score: 2

    The physical attachment and interface of the Moto series is cool. But the "mods" are all wrong.

    The only reason to be able to detach a module is because you don't want to have to lug it around, so you can detach it. This implies that when you attach to a module, you're explicitly in "I understand that it's bulky and I'm not lugging it around" mode at that moment.

    Yet all the modules are severely compromised because they are still trying to be portable.

    Half-assed mobile speakers in the Moto series. A half-assed digital camera.

    Just take those two examples:

    Instead of mobile speakers, how about a $199 stereo speaker system for a tabletop. Instead of having to fuck around with bluetooth and compromised battery life, the speakers are stationary, a home furnishing. You come and just drop your phone *on* it. Magnets hold it in place. It charges. And the screen comes on to the music player app and plays big, loud, full-sound music. Gotta run? Just yank the phone, now charged, off of it again. Make a boombox the same way—or something big enough (not those speakers) to actually make some sound and take to a beach party. Those things I'd be interested in. Tiny-ass speakers? Why am I going to lug around an extra thing for sound that's still basically one person big?

    Same thing with the camera. A 12 megapixel 1 2/3" sensor. THAT'S A CAMERA PHONE ALL OVER AGAIN. I love the idea of a proper shutter button and a flash, but if your built-in camera is already not good enough, why slap an extra, bulky module on the back that... gives you another camera phone sensor? WTF? If you're willing to carry a camera, you're willing to carry a camera. So build one that's a centimeter thicker and has a full 1" sensor in it, and another one that is three centimeters thicker and looks like a DSLR camera body and can mount Micro Four Thirds lenses. It's just got a gap on the back where you can stick your phone, snap, with a magnet. Do so an the phone automatically goes into camera mode. You can mount pro lenses, and when you shoot, it stores on your camera SD card and you have all the photos available to cloud, apps, etc. without having to download from a proper camera or futz around with "camera wifi" that never works. As a shooter, I'd be interested in *both* of those camera modules. But not a bulky camera module that is just a camera phone all over again, so that you double the thickness and weight for (drum roll) the same crap cameraphone sensor that you have without the module.

    I don't think it's a tech fail, and I do think that there is a market for modularity, but it's not in this "half as portable, but still half-functional" module crap. The value is a convenience value, i.e. a better, more capable version of Apple's original iPhone docking port that is magnetic, more capable, communicates with the phone sufficiently to enable tap-free adaptation to new modules, and that has a full-surface (rather than end-port) interface to enhance the physical security of the attachment when made. That's still modular, and it uses the phone as the brain of things to make life easier. I'd pay for that.

    But I won't pay for extra for a phone just so that I can use "modules" when the modules are expensive, highly compromised, bulky things that I don't want. I have to want the modules to want a modular phone. A tiny speaker, a crap camera, etc. are not modules that I want, and extended batteries are already out there.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:The problem is the half-measures. by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      I agree with your statements about the camera and speaker modules, but there's more to it than that. The point is swapping and customization. Aside from the fact that the camera mod sucks, a hobbyist photographer would love to just keep that kind of thing on their phone mostly all the time. The biggest complaint from DLSR users is that they hardly ever have it on them when they need it. Not a photographer? Get a different mod. Almost everyone would appreciate a bigger battery mod. Someone might just want swappable style covers because they're more into fashion (much like swappable watch bands). Personally I'd like a thinner wireless charging cover for day to day while having a battery extender mod ready for vacations. Battery extender cases are bulky, ugly, and cover your usb port. It's too bad motorola only puts the wireless charging in their battery extenders and not in the style covers :\

    2. Re:The problem is the half-measures. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Instead of having to fuck around with bluetooth and compromised battery life

      Bluetooth has improved since you last tried it in 1999. The idea that having to physically dock your phone is better than having it work wireless is nuts.

    3. Re:The problem is the half-measures. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      So bluetooth is a charging technology now?

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    4. Re:The problem is the half-measures. by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      So bluetooth is a charging technology now?

      No, and it also doesn't do your dishes or read your kids a bedtime story.

      Point is, why tie two unrelated functions together: charging and playing music. Sure, maybe whenever YOU are charging YOU want to listen to music, and whenever YOU are listening to music YOU also want to be charging ... but I don't think that works for most people.

      What if my phone is already charged, and I want to say, read a message from my spouse? I have to walk across the house and find it on the speaker dock?

  15. Expanding on this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The big issues are threefold:
    Modular hardware either needs to be cheap, or non-proprietary. Neither is true of the Android modular phone concepts since Google pulled out.
    The modules would need to be in standardized formfactors to benefit the consumer. Standardized formfactors also standardizes large portions of the device real estate. See pre-netbook/cloud laptops and their general layouts due to Peripheral Ports+PCMCIA/Expresscard+Optical Drive+Floppy (for the early ones!) Very few were able to differentiate on peripheral layout, very few used non-standard quantities of available peripherals, and very little differentiation was to be had between designs, beyond perhaps what brand of hardware was used internally.
    Size: Reliable modular components are going to be too big for the current generation of phones. In order to prove reliable the phones are going to have to gain weight. There is no easy way around this, and after all those years of hyping smaller thinner faster better, it will be difficult to backpedal on that to give consumers those options.

    As a final item: It doesn't make sense for companies who've become addicted to the 1-3 year upgrade cycle for their profitability.

    1. Re:Expanding on this: by esperto · · Score: 2

      You hit the nail in the head!
      non-standard modules is a big no-no, motorola is also trying to get a modular phone going with moto z, but the modules are made by them, and only work it that phone, so they are hard to come by, expensive, and you cannot use them after an upgrade or if you change phones. I was really excited by project ara, but then google for some reason decided that changing the screen and chipset would not be possible and then, for some reason, created modules that were pretty useless like a tic tac/pill holder (why???) and the modularity became a gimmick.

  16. Just as Intel releases something that might work by Khyber · · Score: 2

    The new replacement for the Compute Stick could have been an attractive idea for a 'modular' form factor, if they would make it run on very low power. Just have your screen, basic controls, cellular radio, and a battery, and then slap the new Compute Card over it. Instead of having to buy a whole new phone, you just drop in an upgraded Compute Card.

    Oh well. Someone might take this idea and run with it.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  17. Re:LG G3 died within 18 months, will not buy LG ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the EXACT same experience - the G4 has a defect that causes it to stop working, usually after 12 months. Very few G4s will make it to the full 2 years on most cell contracts. LG will even tell you they know about it if you call their service line.

    Do not buy LG, they do not back their products.

  18. Re:LG G3 died within 18 months, will not buy LG ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for your anecdotal evidence.

  19. Re:LG G3 died within 18 months, will not buy LG ag by dargaud · · Score: 1

    Exact same thing here. Soon after purchase I noticed that the phone was slow: 15 to 45s to switch apps ! After a year it was unusable, burning hot, kept rebooting for no reason, couldn't read the SD card anymore, etc. Fried mobo.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  20. Fairphone succeeded in this by Herve5 · · Score: 2

    The current, last-generation Fairphones are not only fully modular, but all the bits can be dismounted with a single normal screwdriver, and each part can be replaced separately in case of failure (and of course, the battery too).
    My understanding is Fairphone, who started from a more compact model (which I own), evolved this way profiting from the trend to enlarge devices (bigger screens) : this allowed them to design element interfaces that otherwise wouldn't have fit in smaller models.
    And IMHO that was a very wise move : they basically brought the design back to Europe (from China) way before being, er... tweeted to do so...
    My only issue with this model is its cost (some 500€, twice the previous model).
    As the thing is very recent there are not many alternate elements for now (I hear about better cameras, saw a breadboard for a large USB slot allowing the use of these hardware-key-dongles...)
    But it definitely is a Lego-like phone (inside!), comes optionally rooted and optionally with Sailfish OS instead of Android, two SIM slots... almost a dream come true for me...
    And my experience with the earlier Fairphone1 is excellent.

    --
    Herve S.
  21. Didn't bring out the one module I wanted. by Bright+Apollo · · Score: 2

    A keyboard. Change out the back, add a little extra battery juice, and give me back a sliding keyboard in the mode of the Motorola D4. Then, old farts could finally type again whilst in the field.

  22. TV not Phones by hhawk · · Score: 1

    A) which is why i didn't buy the G5 (I have a G4) I didn't think it would last more than 1 or 2 market cycles

    B) modular design is a long term commitment by all parties

    C) which is why I believe that as long as folks make Smart TV they are doing consumers a huge disfavor... People can keep "screens" for 5, 10, 15+ years or more.. and the "smart" features will hit "the wall" before then. So I'm sure the TV companies will be happy if we replace or screens sooner, than later.

    BUT that is why consumers must demand modules for our TVs. Of course we can always connect out-board CPUs via HDMI ports, but every component should modular. We should be able to replace CPUs, add new tuners, add new ports, etc.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
  23. QWERTY by short · · Score: 2

    What about to make a new QWERTY phone after 7+ years. No BlackBerry - it needs to have a keyboard on its longer side, have landscape display and have physical arrow keys. More extra keys for shifts+symbols are a plus.

  24. That's false by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is completely false, LG will repair boot-looped G4s even after they are out of warranty. They even pay for shipping.

  25. CANCELLED BEFORE LIFTOFF by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    It seems like ALL these projects are killed off before they're ever even really released to the market. Or hey, we released a phone and we have two basic modules (extended battery and IR remote) with more to come, someday...okay....never.

    But darn it, I am TIRED of thin phones with small batteries. Give me a module phone system where I can stick a battery module that will last 2+ days of use rather than a few hours. Give me a module that lets me output 5.1 surround sound. Module for RAID5 SD card storage. Module for printing.

    Truthfully, what we really need is an interconnect specification. For example, said spec could allow DSLR manufacturers to simply make the lens and sensor body. Storage, screen, and all that would connect via the interconnect specification.

    Essentially, we'd reach the point where we have Personal Processing Devices. You no longer have desktops or laptops. You have your PPD, connect to a dock and have keyboard, screen, additional storage. Add a wireless module. We'll get there...eventually. But just like smartphones and electric cars, it's going to take an innovator to put it together correctly to make it take off.

    1. Re:CANCELLED BEFORE LIFTOFF by IMightB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um no. While I am tired of thin phones ith small batteries as well, there simply no way I'm going to take a bulky DSLR attachment for my phone anywhere. I'd rather take a bulky DSLR to take real pictures. same with RAID, Audio, etc.etc. the phones today are good enough for joe avg. but when you actually want quality something, a dedicated device will always be superior.

      I swear to God the first time I buy a concert ticket and the DJ hooks up an iPhone, I'm demanding my money back.

    2. Re:CANCELLED BEFORE LIFTOFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were concerts with two dudes playing Game Boy. Chill out.
      What the parent says about DSLR allows to do it the other way around, btw : get a real bulky DSLR, but one where you can swap in or out the computer part. Just like those already existing smart TVs (but a standard needs to get hold) where you can swap out the computer board from the back.

      Not sure if that DSLR example can become a commercial reality or if it'd be that good an idea, but that is the idea.

    3. Re:CANCELLED BEFORE LIFTOFF by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Correct.

  26. Fairphone 2 by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Only a tiny minirity nerds were ever wanking their micropeens over modular phones.

    Meanwhile, Fairphone 2 is still selling well.

    The key point is that, through their "environmental-friendly" policy, they have managed to find a way to make modules also appealing to a larger audience
    (modules means easier to repair a phone by swapping a broken component instead of throwing it away whole)
    and not only to the 3 geeks that are salivating about the idea of creating their own custom module to tap into the available internal USB pogopins.

    Thus they have found a way to make modularity commercially viable and even trendy (by being eco-friendly).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  27. Ironic by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    They're snapping out their modular products and replacing them with others

  28. Re:I wanted a G5 ! - Could not find a demo of DAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    32 bit 384KHz is bunk though, you can really convert your flacs to 16bit/48 KHz safely and get the maximum quality for humans, also DACs reconstruct sine-like waves from even few data points, not a staircase shaped wave like snake oil salesmen want you to believe, that's why the Shannon-Nyquist theorem from 1949 that's the basis for everything digital signal still holds, it's like selling you a 64K resolution TV when an 8K is enough unless you have non human vision.