Slashdot Mirror


Apple Could Finally Sell More Devices Than Microsoft In 2017 (computerworld.com)

Gartner predicts Apple will ship more iOS and macOS devices in 2017 than Windows-powered devices "for the first time this century," and then increase their lead over the next two years. An anonymous reader quotes Computerworld: Gartner predicted that iOS + macOS, unlike Windows, will recover in 2017. Apple's OSes will climb 8% to 268 million this year, add 3% in 2018 to reach 276 million, then increase another 3% in 2019, with that year's device shipment forecast at 285 million. Windows will dip this year, then stagnate for the following two years... The gap between Microsoft and Apple -- 12 million last year, with Microsoft atop -- will widen to 27 million by 2019, advantage Apple.

"The global devices market is stagnating," said Gartner analyst Ranjit Atwal in a statement Wednesday. Mobile phone shipments are growing only in emerging markets in the Asia and Pacific markets, Atwal added, and noted that "The PC market is just reaching the bottom of its decline." The PC industry's troubles have affected Microsoft most of all; Windows is almost entirely dependent on PC shipments, which have been stuck in a protracted slump. Future shipments were further hit when Microsoft walked away from the smartphone business last year.

The article also points out that even in 2016, Windows devices came in second, and "accounted for approximately 11.2% of the total devices, which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android."

98 comments

  1. "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And every Android device sold gives Microsoft 5-15 dollars of pure profit because of licensing agreements.

    1. Re:"which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still I'm fangirling for android. Tho even if it's apple who wins I'm good with it. Windoze must die a grueling death. It held back computing for far too long.

    2. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems really backwards to be rooting for either apple or Android, since both are walled gardens compared to any PC platform.

    3. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      It seems really backwards to be rooting for either apple or Android, since both are walled gardens compared to any PC platform.

      Have you seen Win10?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    4. Re:"which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. This has been reported years ago with made-up numbers, and then it's quoted again and again with new made-up numbers, but I've never seen anyone verify it in earnings reports. Is there any evidence of these tens of billions of dollars being earned by Microsoft every year?

    5. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, Microsoft doesn't have to approve every application I run on my Windows computer. I can run any application I want. How is Win10 more restrictive than iOS or Android? When was the last time you were prevented from having root on your PC?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    6. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, I wasn't forced to download a new OS at the whim of vendors on any of my devices. When was the last time you could turn on your Win10 system and not worry about whether it was the same system as the last time you shut it down while you have an internet connection?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    7. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with walled garden policies of Apple and Google which prevent you from running whatever apps you want? Forced updates is nothing new, Google does that as well, and I would assume that Apple does as well, but I don't use them. The forced updates were to fix an issue, the enormous issue of zombie PCs from clueless users. Many users ignore updates indefinately because they don't understand the risk, or don't want to deal with them. Microsoft was trying to fix this issue by making many (all?) updates manditory if you are unwilling to pay for the pro version. If you don't want the auto updates, pay a bit extra for the pro version and turn them off. However, if you turn them off, you are now taking responsability for it and can't bitch when your computer gets owned by any number of attack vectors.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with walled garden policies of Apple and Google which prevent you from running whatever apps you want? Forced updates is nothing new, Google does that as well, and I would assume that Apple does as well, but I don't use them.

      What does that have to do with the question posed? That of not being in control of your OS. FYI - MS forces new code on you regardless of your desires, you will get new features, removed functions, bug fixes, and yes, security fixes.

      To address your question, I run what I want on both my iOS and Android devices. Granted, I'm a dev on both, but hey, not everyone gets to code their cars either....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    9. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      AC

      It seems really backwards to be rooting for either apple or Android, since both are walled gardens compared to any PC platform.

      You

      Have you seen Win10?

      Me

      Last I checked, Microsoft doesn't have to approve every application I run on my Windows computer. I can run any application I want. How is Win10 more restrictive than iOS or Android? When was the last time you were prevented from having root on your PC?

      ...

      You

      What does that have to do with the question posed? That of not being in control of your OS.

      Question answered by reading the thread. You responded to someone complaining about a walled garden, not about control of the OS. Did you not read what you replied to above? You are the one who seems to be derailing the thread, I pointed that out to you, as MS doesn't have a walled garden, they allow you to run whatever you want on your PC.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Question answered by reading the thread. You responded to someone complaining about a walled garden, not about control of the OS. Did you not read what you replied to above? You are the one who seems to be derailing the thread, I pointed that out to you, as MS doesn't have a walled garden, they allow you to run whatever you want on your PC.

      If you don't have control of your OS (which you do on your phones at least as far as upgrades go) then you are in a worse position than a walled garden. If you don't see the much graver implications there, you're not seeing the forest for the trees.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The question you should be asking than is, "should normal users have control over thier updates", MS's answer to that is no, because they never run them. If you feel that you, as an advanced user, should be given control over your updates, buy the correct version of Windows, the one designed for more advanced users, Windows 10 Pro. No one is losing control of their updates but the people who never controlled them in the first place. If you have issues with MS taking steps towards security that they were constantly slammed for in the past, then what is your solution to the problem? How would you handle the majority of users that never run security updates and therefore have zombie PCs and IOT devices participating in botnets?

      You are slamming MS for making proactive steps to correct an issue that they have been criticised in the past for, unless you have a better solution, you are just being anti-MS, and not actually contributing to the conversation.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re: "which overwhelmingly ran Google's Android." by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      The question you should be asking than is, "should normal users have control over thier updates", MS's answer to that is no, because they never run them. If you feel that you, as an advanced user, should be given control over your updates, buy the correct version of Windows, the one designed for more advanced users, Windows 10 Pro.

      You get no meaningful control under Win10 Pro either. It's lip service at best. You will still be upgraded, with or without your consent.

      No one is losing control of their updates but the people who never controlled them in the first place. If you have issues with MS taking steps towards security that they were constantly slammed for in the past, then what is your solution to the problem? How would you handle the majority of users that never run security updates and therefore have zombie PCs and IOT devices participating in botnets?

      Actually, I could support "forced updates" if that avenue was solely used for necessary security updates for things that were actually on my machine, which only fixed the actual bugs and didn't change behavior nor added anything new to the system. MS has consistently been unwilling to offer such a real security patch set, instead always leveraging updates to add and change things. It's only gotten worse with Win10.

      If anyone is not contributing to the conversation, it is MS with their monologue of "all your PC belong to us".

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  2. Phones are not desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apples and Oranges

    1. Re: Phones are not desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who do you think you are, contradicting a seasoned analyst with basic observations like that?

    2. Re: Phones are not desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who applied the seasoning? Was it granulated bullshit?

    3. Re: Phones are not desktops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "seasoned analyst" is an indo-chimp with a typical opinionated dumbshit mixed with bullshit, straight out indo-jungle ass.

  3. Phones and computers vs computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I mean, come on. Microsoft isn't even "shipping" these devices in the first place.

    But since when does comparing apples and oranges to just oranges not make you a joke?

    1. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To be fair, Microsoft has been making phone software far longer than Apple. Everyone forgets about it though, because it's been shit for 16+ years.

    2. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by BLToday · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wait, I would say MSFT had a decent mobile OS (relatively) from 2001-2007. I remember at the first iPhone (iOS 1), WM2005 had far more functionality (etc. GPS, apps, handwriting support). WM was better than PalmOS because I moved from the Palm m505 over to the HP iPaq 1910 and then to the GPS iPaq smartphone (don't remember the model number). iPhone didn't get gps support until the iPhone 3G.

      So MSFT only screwed up the last 10 years of mobile development. It's the tortoise and hare problem. MSFT exceeded features and crushed the existing competitions (Palm, Netscape, Lotus, WordPerfect) and then sat around getting pass by new competitions (iOS, Android, Chrome).

    3. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Yep, I liked my WM phones as well, starting with the very first XDA and ending with HTC HD2 (although the latter wasn't as comfortable to use as expected due to the bloody capacitive display). Some functionality was way better than even on current android phones.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, PocketPC and it's descendants are shit, and they were shit when they shipped. Any phone that requires you to kill apps through a device manager in order to not crash when answering a phone call is fucking terrible.

      Take off the rose colored nostalgia glasses - there's a reason why Blackberry crushed Windows Mobile.

    5. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows phone is actually kind of nice. It got killed by the lack of apps and I'd say indirectly via carriers not marketing it. A few years back I got a Lumia 920. I went into the store and asked to see the phone. The guy at the store looked at me like I had two heads. I don't really think the lack of apps is that big of a deal but it does limit the usefulness for little things like if your grocery store only has a app for android or iPhone. You then have to go to the website: the horror. I think it is more of a preception thing than an actual lack of features. Same thing keeps people away from Outlook or Yahoo mail. They basically do the same thing, might be more or less ugly and of course if you have android might have a downside of not coming built in. But really not that much different. You have an inbox and stuff in it to read. It doens't really take a rocket scientist to move between the two.

    6. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by youngone · · Score: 1

      PocketPC and it's descendants are shit

      That's exactly what I was thinking. Years ago I had the pleasure of supporting a bunch of Nokia (dumb) phones, a couple of iPhones, and about 20 Blackberries. None of them were really much of a problem, except the one idiot manager who insisted on having a windows phone. I was the one lumbered with supported the stupid thing until my boss talked him into getting an iPhone.

    7. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In 1997, Windows CE was the best of the best of the best with honors. Its competition was garbage like Newton and Palm. Not a high bar, but a bar nonetheless. iOS wasn't even an itch in Steve Jobs' left asscheek yet. Android was in a similar place (that is, not even at the "wouldn't it be great?" stage yet).

      In 2007, Windows Mobile 6 (running on the CE 5.2 kernel) was mature and established. Its competition was Blackberry and the original iPhone (before it had a name for its OS). Android was relatively unheard of. Meanwhile, Newton had been dead for 10 years and Palm was being reapportioned by lawyers.

      In 2017, Windows 10 Mobile (running on the NT 6.4-renumbered-to-10.0 kernel) is far and away more stable, more usable, and nicer to use than any Android ever dreamed of being, and puts iOS to shame for its ability to be simple to use, yet capable of complex operations. I wouldn't trade you any new, shiny phones for my Lumia 950XL. (I would not have said the same of my HTC Touch Pro 2 running WinMo 6.5.)

      I'd say WinMo became quite usable in the WinPhone 8.1 timeframe. Prior to that, MS was busy making a decent operating system and learning all of the lessons that have stung iOS and Android over the last several years. Sure, they're far outselling WinMo, and they're catching up technologically, too. But they still have a ways to go, and Microsoft isn't sitting still. They've declared WinMo a "strategic" (a.k.a. research) project. The last big Microsoft research project ("min-win") turned into an enterprise-ready hypervisor, a version of Windows that can be installed on a Raspberry Pi, and a simple development system that allows publishing across any device that runs any current version of Windows (including the aforementioned Raspberry Pi, as long as you keep its resource constraints in mind as you develop your app).

      Have an opinion, that's fine. But don't count Microsoft out just because you don't like them.

    8. Re:Phones and computers vs computers? by D,Petkow · · Score: 1

      I second this opinion above me, this comparison about cumulative sales between two companies which core businesses are super different is a bit irrelevant imo

    9. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      (although the latter wasn't as comfortable to use as expected due to the bloody capacitive display)

      Resistive display? Current phones have capactive displays, and I can't say I have heard them called bloody...unless you are bludgening people with the latest thin phones.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re: Phones and computers vs computers? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Would you feel better if I call it a "goddamn capacitive display"?
      HTC HD2 had a capacitive touchscreen and I hated it. I prefer resistive touchscreens, they are much more precise and can be operated with anything.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  4. Bullshit by The+Raven · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Predictions are not worth the toilet paper they are printed on.

    Apple has suffered from a lack of progress ever since Jobs died. They are treading water... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster. 'Predicting' that they will succeed and Microsoft will falter is dubious.

    The only real winner is Google, with Over 3/4 of the market for device operating systems.

    --
    "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree regarding the lack of innovation at Apple.

      But regarding sales, look at the chart at the bottom of the article. Apple has been catching up to Microsoft, in terms of devices sold, whose OS comes from Apple vs. Microsoft. If Apple's iPhone sales recover this year, then more Apple-OS devices might be sold than Microsoft-OS devices.

    2. Re:Bullshit by jblues · · Score: 1

      Fully closed source? All of the Unix-like operating system that sits beneath the UI system of OSX is open source.

      --
      If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
    3. Re:Bullshit by Cochonou · · Score: 2

      Technically, Mac OS X is not FULLY closed source.

    4. Re:Bullshit by ruir · · Score: 1

      Gartner has always been known in the techie world as the king of mumbo jumbo. Their bullshit quadrants are only good to show to PHBs and customers alike.

    5. Re:Bullshit by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      ... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster ...

      Do you mean the new 12" MacBook or the MacBook line in it's entirety? People keep comparing the MacBook to much bigger more powerful laptops and putting it down because it doesn't have the horsepower to run insanely resource intensive stuff like BioShock, Titanfall or Doom (mind you I have hooked my MacBook up to a 4K display and played video without getting so much as a stutter) but that kind of misses the point. If I want to play games I'll buy a console and I don't see the MacBook as a drop in replacement for a 15 inch i7 laptop, I see it as something that is as portable and light as a tablet but with a better and more flexible desktop environment. The only beef I have with the MacBook is that it could do with one or two extra USB-C ports and and being a Raspberry Pi programmer I would have liked a micro SD card slot. The new Pro's on the other hand were disappointing, I don't see the that fancy touch bar as something particularly useful and they should have had i7 processors, if only for better battery life.

    6. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Others here may want to tear you a new one, but I think that you have a valid opinion.
      I'm developing a new kind of... well, for want of a better term... "Authoring Software". Tools for creating ideas, and means of claiming Priority for them. Pretty much a way of actually making claims for "Intellectual Property"... legitimate.
      And I'm doing it on a MacBook. A key part of making this work is the Darwin underpinnings. There is far more power given away freely in there, than the average slobbering Slashdotter realizes. Microsoft is eternally hopeless, and Linux advocates are a bunch of cats clawing each other in a bag, a bag rapidly sinking in the river of time. I rather liked Linux, especially when it came to Slackware, but the World has moved on.

      "The only beef I have with the MacBook is that it could do with one or two extra USB-C ports and and being a Raspberry Pi programmer I would have liked a micro SD card slot."
      There are third party solutions for this. Apple doesn't have to handhold _everybody_. But I commend you on being a "Raspberry Pi programmer". What if, with the huge piles of Cash available, Apple simply bought out Wind River and National Instruments? What if, alongside with Garageband, LabView was included as a part of the basic Install? LabView development started out on Macs, after all. (A rather interesting diversion: For a few years, openly developed LabView VIs were freely available on a .mil Domain...)
      What if, LabView ate a Raspberry Pi, and burped?

      A few years back, I caused a commotion. In an Apple Developers Meeting, I simply asked when LabView was returning to OSX, and when it would be available for this new iOS thingy. "Apple does not comment on these matters." was the response. Yet a couple of days later, I got a CD, sent anonymously through the Lab Mail, with pretty much everything included that I could wish for.
      And so, true development of this Internet happily continues.

      Captcha: atrocity
      I think not...

    7. Re:Bullshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Predictions are not worth the toilet paper they are printed on.

      Apple has suffered from a lack of progress ever since Jobs died. They are treading water... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster. 'Predicting' that they will succeed and Microsoft will falter is dubious.

      The only real winner is Google, with Over 3/4 of the market for device operating systems.

      Show me anyone's laptop which is fundamentally different now than it was in 2013.

    8. Re:Bullshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Gartner has always been known in the techie world as the king of mumbo jumbo. Their bullshit quadrants are only good to show to PHBs and customers alike.

      Sounds like a typical opinion of someone who's personal opinion doesn't agree with an analysist's.

    9. Re:Bullshit by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      A few years back, I caused a commotion. In an Apple Developers Meeting, I simply asked when LabView was returning to OSX, and when it would be available for this new iOS thingy. "Apple does not comment on these matters." was the response. Yet a couple of days later, I got a CD, sent anonymously through the Lab Mail, with pretty much everything included that I could wish for. And so, true development of this Internet happily continues.

      I was horrified by your comment regarding LabView on OS X, being old enough to remember LabView being Mac-only.

      It looks like LabView Full and Professional are available for Mac. I assume that means OS X, right? So what were you talking about?

    10. Re:Bullshit by lucm · · Score: 1

      Show me anyone's laptop which is fundamentally different now than it was in 2013.

      Even $400 bargain machines at Best Buy have touch screen and/or are convertible. Many models have powerful GPU that are required for VR devices. The Yoga Book keyboard can work as a drawing board. The Razer Blade Stealth has a 4k display and an external plug-in GPU. MSI has a laptop that can track eye movement and use it to control video game cameras. The list goes on but the Macbook is not on it.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    11. Re:Bullshit by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Apple has suffered from a lack of progress ever since Jobs died. They are treading water... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster. 'Predicting' that they will succeed and Microsoft will falter is dubious.

      On the other hand they got a friend of mine who hasn't worn a watch since 1998 to buy an Apple Watch. Actually two, first he bought one for his significant other and then he got jealous and bought one for himself. I know anecdotes aren't data, but Apple doesn't have to defend every market they're in as long as they grow new ones. I could see Apple launching a 2-in-1 convertible like the Surface Pro and decide between that and iCloud they don't care much about having any other kind of Mac. It would be enough for a vast majority of the PC users and the rest would simply be a market Apple won't serve.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:Bullshit by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      Apple has suffered from a lack of progress ever since Jobs died. They are treading water... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster. 'Predicting' that they will succeed and Microsoft will falter is dubious.

      On the other hand they got a friend of mine who hasn't worn a watch since 1998 to buy an Apple Watch. Actually two, first he bought one for his significant other and then he got jealous and bought one for himself. I know anecdotes aren't data, but Apple doesn't have to defend every market they're in as long as they grow new ones. I could see Apple launching a 2-in-1 convertible like the Surface Pro and decide between that and iCloud they don't care much about having any other kind of Mac. It would be enough for a vast majority of the PC users and the rest would simply be a market Apple won't serve.

      I'm willing to bet that your friend is an outlier, one of the few who can afford to spend $370 for a watch, not just once but twice. Yes, there is a market for the Apple watch, but it currently isn't anywhere near big enough to push apple device sales to the levels being discussed.

      As for Apple creating a convertible laptop, why? All they really need to do is create an iPad that runs OSX, but then they would eat into the Mac market. In fact, Time Cook has already said that they wouldn't do this... http://www.macrumors.com/2015/...

    13. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say this, but this is the perfect time to insert the why is this news, comment. Garner had proven over and over to be useless. Palm readers would be as reliable. That would be news.

    14. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > doesn't agree with an analysist's.

      It is reality that doesn't agree with the analysts.

      Gartner and IDC were predicting that Windows Phone would overtake iPhone by 2014, 2015, 2017, ...

    15. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apples and oranges. Apple does really good at keeping high margins but selling bits versus selling gizmos. Unless you really screw up software will always have stupidly high margins. Hardware is more likely to get the margin squeezed by price competition.

    16. Re:Bullshit by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Technically, Mac OS X is not FULLY closed source.

      Technically, OSX is open source compared to Windows.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:Bullshit by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Apple does not exist in a vacuum, it does not have to do everything right as long as it's competitors are screwing up more. So Apple did enough to sell people privacy, rather than selling their privacy versus M$'s attitude to people's privacy, it's up for sale to the highest bidder to be manipulated any way they want to.

      M$ being a pack of arrogant perves means as consumer devices they just come off as really undesirable, the only thing keeping MS Orifice and Windows Probe going are existing customer lock in and that is starting to fail. M$ have not been able to successfully launch a product for years because their brands sucks and no matter how much they spend of marketing, most people ignore it.

      Apple does not need to do any better, it just needs to avoid the M$ mistake of continually doing things worse to see what it can get away with to screw over customers more. M$ is following the exact same route as the Lotus eaters, simply arrogantly assuming it can continue to get away with it and failing.

      I have never ever owned an Apple device but now I am considering an Apple desktop (just for simple gaming sake and I am not going to fight with my OS for control of my computer).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hear the new macbooks are significantly worse then they were in 2013

    19. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It looks like LabView Full and Professional are available for Mac."
      They are now. It has been a few years since then. But it is utter bloat now. Since you seem to know what you are talking about, remember back when LabView could run on a IIsi, with the maxed-out 16MB of RAM, in this case through the GPIB NUBUS Interface Card, and actually get work done? (Displaying Dosimetry from three Ion Chambers. LabView was our Darling, our little very merry maid.)

      " So what were you talking about?"
      The Past, so full of Promise.

      I'm working now on the Future.

    20. Re:Bullshit by ruir · · Score: 1

      I would be an analyst too within Gartners parameters: "Grass will be green in two years time, mobile use will increase by 30%, and cars will have round wheels in the future.

    21. Re:Bullshit by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Show me anyone's laptop which is fundamentally different now than it was in 2013.

      Even $400 bargain machines at Best Buy have touch screen and/or are convertibl

      Which was all the hype in 2013. So what is new again?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    22. Re: Bullshit by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but this is the perfect time to insert the why is this news, comment. Garner had proven over and over to be useless. Palm readers would be as reliable. That would be news.

      The news is that Gartner no longer predicts a bright future for Windows Phones.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    23. Re:Bullshit by lucm · · Score: 1

      Show me anyone's laptop which is fundamentally different now than it was in 2013.

      Even $400 bargain machines at Best Buy have touch screen and/or are convertibl

      Which was all the hype in 2013. So what is new again?

      Except for Macbooks, right? As for what else is new, look at the rest of the post you truncated in your reply.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    24. Re:Bullshit by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      . So what is new again?

      Macbooks

      So you finally admt everything you claimed so far is wrong. Well, that's a certainly new.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  5. Can we please have $30 a year? by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    No tracking. No gimmicks.

    Seriously!

    I know it's not billions but it's at least a 100 million a year. They should have stayed there and been grateful with 50 employees.

  6. Absolutely right! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Funny

    The part they are leaving out is that everyone will also be installing Linux on those devices because 2017 is finally going to be the year of the Linux Desktop! ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Absolutely right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, Windows 10's failed updates and forced reboots could very well increase Linux's market share. Keep it up, MS !

  7. Too early to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's too early to tell what will happen 6 months from now in the Technology world. One hit device can change everything.
    The biggest mistake Microsoft made with windows phone was charging a license fee for the OS. It should have been free for all manufactures to use.

    1. Re:Too early to tell by lucm · · Score: 1

      The biggest mistake Microsoft made with windows phone was charging a license fee for the OS. It should have been free for all manufactures to use.

      That's a tough business case to make. Microsoft makes around 3 billions a year with Windows Phone. Would they really have a bigger market share if they had given that away? Would it be worth more than 3 billions for them?

      Look at Windows desktop. They make 12 billions a year just on OEM licenses even though everyone is announcing the Death of PC. Microsoft is a profit machine, year in year out, and this is because they sell stuff they don't give it away.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  8. Uhm...and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok so Apple may sell more devices than Windows next year. Apple is losing share in Window's biggest market, the desktop and laptop PC, which has never been dependent upon additional software sales for pushing devices to market.

    MS walked away from the phone market pretty much. But they never had a solid foothold in it anyways.
    MS is indeed in the tablet market, but still very niche compared to the gorillas iOS and Android.

    Oh wait, are we gonna talk about Google selling more devices than either (Android has more of the mobile device market than Apple after all)?

    Nah. He wants to keep Apple stock up until he and his buddies decide to sell at the top of the bubble and pop it. Why else compare two irrelevant numbers as if they were somehow connected and important? Or is he just an idiot who doesn't know even the latest flagship laptops and desktops from Apple are using 5 year old technology which makes them less useful than your average WalMart special with an extra 200 USD dropped on extra RAM and a decent graphics card, and twice as expensive as the same computer package!

    Apple: Losing ground in both PC and Mobile markets. BUY! BUY! BUY!!!!

    To jump back in though... more and more PC owners are learning they don't need to ditch their 3 year old computer and can instead opt to upgrade it. SSD, more RAM, and a new graphics card and their old machine is better than new. But they do buy those extras and upgrades... can we count those as device buys? If we did, would that blow the doors off both Apple and Google? Would it prove old men who don't understand technology are using increasingly outdated metrics to make market predictions and pump stocks to sell to other old men who don't understand it either?

    1. Re:Uhm...and? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      ... more and more PC owners are learning they don't need to ditch their 3 year old computer and can instead opt to upgrade it. SSD, more RAM, and a new graphics card and their old machine is better than new. But they do buy those extras and upgrades... can we count those as device buys?

      No, because how does Microsoft make any money off someone who upgrades their graphics card and storage, but who doesn't buy a new Windows license? Or did Microsoft start manufacturing graphics cards and SSD's when I wasn't looking?

      Yaz

    2. Re:Uhm...and? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      No, because how does Microsoft make any money off someone who upgrades their graphics card and storage, but who doesn't buy a new Windows license?

      Office 365 (slightly tongue in cheek)

      And maybe a Windows 365 Enterprise subscription (which if it lets a single user put Windows Enterprise (with control over updates, no telemetry, etc etc...) on his gaming desktop, his laptop, and his HTPC... for one price (the same way office 365 works) that might well be alluring to "people who care".

      While the "people who don't" will run home/pro and suffer Microsoft's "management" of their PC.

      more and more PC owners are learning they don't need to ditch their 3 year old computer and can instead opt to upgrade it. SSD, more RAM, and a new graphics card and their old machine is better than new.

      OTOH... more and more mac owners are learning that their new Mac will only ever have what it shipped from the factory with, and that the ram upgrade and SSD upgrade that makes the stuff from 2010 still usable today... is NOT going to be a pattern that repeats anymore.

      Right now, most windows gear is still upgradable... but desktops are shrinking and ultrabooks are growing... so the tipping point is coming. Enthusiasts / gamers may still have the option to upgrade their 'rigs' but mom and pop might be stuck with whatever is soldered onto their ultrabook...

    3. Re:Uhm...and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > MS walked away from the phone market pretty much. But they never had a solid foothold in it anyways.

      Microsoft had 42% of the US smartphone market in 2007.

  9. Yeah, because their biz is in forced obsolesce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple has pretty much perfected the passive aggressive forced obsolescence thing.

    They don't actively force you to upgrade anything. They just make sure you can't downgrade any of their handhelds (unless you take it into the service center, then you're getting upgraded to the latest iOS whether you want it or not- good chance if you've got an older device, this will intentionally cripple it by installing a slower OS).

    All their software basically requires the latest greatest OS as soon as they're able to pull that off without pissing off the majority. Don't have the latest OS? Too bad for you, backwards compatibility hasn't been a thing since they dropped Rosetta support in 10.7. Then you run into stupid situations where your handheld doesn't want to sync with iTunes because iTunes is too old (even though all this shit should be standardized to the point that it doesn't matter), and you can't upgrade iTunes because that requires a new version of the OS, but the new version of the OS has fairly serious quirks on your current hardware... etc, etc, etc.

    The hilarious thing is that most of the people I know who have money to spend... Basically just throw their hands up in the air, and run out and buy all new stuff. Which works for 2-3 years, until all the Apple software changes enough that things stop working again, and then they just do the exact same thing.

    Meanwhile, Windows 10 will run on a... what, 10 year old computer? It's no wonder they're not selling more devices than Apple.

    1. Re:Yeah, because their biz is in forced obsolesce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you buy an apple gadget it will be supported with apple software for at least 4 years. With 3rd party softwares even longer. My 5 year old desktop (ok now it's 6, also it's an ubuntu AFS server for my apple stuffs) can't install win10. Long gone are the times when you could install m$ software on old hw...
      Plus if as an IT tech guy you can't buy new gadgets every 4 years then change jobs. Pass down old stuffs to kids. Or to some elderly neighbors.

    2. Re: Yeah, because their biz is in forced obsolesce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. We do have an infestation problem, but Slashdot is a nerd site, not an 'IT tech site'.

    3. Re:Yeah, because their biz is in forced obsolesce by David_Hart · · Score: 2

      if you buy an apple gadget it will be supported with apple software for at least 4 years. With 3rd party softwares even longer. My 5 year old desktop (ok now it's 6, also it's an ubuntu AFS server for my apple stuffs) can't install win10. Long gone are the times when you could install m$ software on old hw...
      Plus if as an IT tech guy you can't buy new gadgets every 4 years then change jobs. Pass down old stuffs to kids. Or to some elderly neighbors.

      Windows 10 will install perfectly fine on almost any 5/6 year old desktop. My Dad has two generations of my old desktops and they are 7 and 10 years old and they run Windows 10 just fine. Granted, both were upgrades from Windows 7, but it proves that Windows 10 will run on older hardware just fine.

      For some drivers, you may have to install the Windows NT/2K versions (i.e. turn off driver Signature Verification) and you may have to go through the process of loading them as part of the installation as it may not have them on the installation CD. But it works. You just need to do a bit of research and download the necessary drivers for the installation.

  10. Have they forgotten Apple have shrunk this quarte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have computerworld gone mad? In a year when apple's production, sales, and profits are DOWN they're still apparently growing?

    Something makes no sense whatsoever.

  11. Everyone is building their walled garden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone has their userbase, and is making obscene amounts of money for very little actual work or innovation and MS/Google/Apple are quite happy and only interested in continuing this trend.

    They are all, rather than labeling buttons/options creating glyphs that make switching platforms more difficult for theirs... Making deals with hardware vendors to add hardware and or firmware blocks to keep Linux or any other OS off their hardware. This is not overly necessary as some simply don't release hardware/driver specs so the work needed to create a driver isn't worth the effort to the linux community(Winbook TW700-TW100 tablets would be one example of the majority of tablets and power efficient laptops).

    I will give up computers before running Windows 10 or newer on principle of its EULA and MS's behavior ; Apple never stood a chance(With me, I'm from the 80s and not gay or trendy and know value of hardware) and Android is only popular because the alternatives are SOOOO BAD already.

    Put some effort into building a x86 PC Phone, modern OQO that can SMS/Dial through a simple program on any Linux/WindowsXP-Win7+ and I suspect it would blow them all out of water; but that would break the garden walls and end need for laptops/desktops for the average user(plug into dock when you get where your going).

    1. Re:Everyone is building their walled garden by lucm · · Score: 2

      I believe Microsoft is aware that the device war is lost, they're just milking it while it lasts. But that doesn't mean they stopped innovating; for instance, 5 years ago their cloud offering was a half-baked web Office and a retarded ASP.Net hosting service; now you can run Kafka queues, execute Hadoop jobs or get real-time speech-to-text services.

      Meanwhile Apple innovation is forcing their customers to buy bluetooth headphones and adding emojis in the chat app.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  12. Re:Have they forgotten Apple have shrunk this quar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >production, sales, and profits are DOWN
    >they're still apparently growing?

    No, someone else is shrinking faster.

  13. Re:Number of fucks given: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes yes, you are a very special snowflake who needs special computers.

  14. Re:Number of fucks given: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Openbox works fine for me, thanks.

  15. Re: Number of fucks given: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Uhhh... yeah it did but right now Apple is asleep at the wheel while Microsoft is actually innovating. The Linux subsystem in Windows 10 is very awesome.

    As a long time Mac user (12 years) I'm getting ready to go to Windows as sad as that is for me.

  16. Timberland Homme Pas Chers by zhenbajun · · Score: 1

    timberland Homme La scène se déroule, il y a quelques mois, au cur de Paris. Dans la petite et unique boutique Gianvito Rossi, au numéro 40 de la rue du Mont-Thabor, une ribambelle de femmes s’agitent, déambulent autour des étals, essayant dans un joyeux capharnaüm stilettos aux proportions parfaites, sandales plates à la grâce subtile et boots à talons rock juste ce qu’il faut. Certaines repartiront avec, dans leurs shopping bags, plusieurs paires - tout de même autour de 600 euros l’unité -, alors que les vendeurs s’empressent de remettre en exposition de nouveaux modèles pour les prochaines clientes déjà sur le pas de la porte. D’il d’experte, cela s’appelle un succès - d’après la vendeuse, la scène se reproduit chaque week-end. Mais une notoriété d’initiées. Car ici, peu de touristes et de badauds. Plutôt des Parisiennes passionnées de mode qui s’échangent l’adresse de cet Italien, fils du chausseur renommé Sergio Rossi.

  17. So? by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >"Gartner predicts Apple will ship more iOS and macOS devices in 2017 than Windows-powered devices"

    So? That includes phones so it is not much of a metric.

    You want to mop the floor and talk about "devices"? Then count how many devices ship with any form of Linux.... that would DWARF both Apple and MS. Android phones, Chromebooks, DVR's, cars, watches, TV's, tablets, routers, appliances, servers, etc, etc. When you look at that, Apple and MS are both just drops in an ocean.

  18. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    95% of them will be returned because they have no headphone jack and no USB-A ports.

  19. Re:Number of fucks given: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is 5c dude. Go and buy yourself a better computer.

  20. Is the whole world gay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple and the pussification of America:

    discuss.

    1. Re:Is the whole world gay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple and the pussification of America:

      discuss.

      Trump and the pussygrabification of America. Shut up.

  21. And yet their share of PC users is at a 5 year low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if this is true as well it just means falling desktop/laptop sales in general.

  22. No Need to Exaggeate by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple has suffered from a lack of progress ever since Jobs died. They are treading water... it took them 5 years to update the MacBook, and what we got was lackluster.

    Not entirely correct. After Jobs died they had a year or two of progress before it petered out and it only took they 1.5 years to update the MacBook - but what we got was over expensive crap, not just lacklustre. It is the Mac itself, specifically the Mac Pro, which they have not updated for ~4 years and which they still attempt to sell for full price which is appalling.

    It is hard to see how this prediction will come true unless there is a surge in iOS devices because at the moment Apple have no mac machines which can compete with PCs and MS is now clearly out innovating them with its surface line. It's bad enough that my next laptop will be the new Dell XPS 15 - the CPU and GPU are both better than the new MacBook pros, it has both USB-C and USB-A (see Apple you can put both on a laptop), the keyboard actually moves, the entire screen is touch-based and it costs $1,000 less. I can't see how Apple will grow with competition like this. macOS may be better then Windows 10 but Windows 10 has improved enormously and you can always use Linux if you need to.

  23. Easy since MS doesn't really make devices! by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't this have always been the case? MS makes software and sells services, their focus isn't really on devices, they let third parties do that

  24. Re: Number of fucks given: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the Apple cart that's increasing sales given that the bad year they had.

    It's just Windows becoming less relevant as a OS platform.

    I'm saying Windows, not Microsoft cos they are way less relevant on their Windows Ecosystem and they still manage to grow steadily. They are just no longer the same company that's OS centric anymore.

    That's only a good thing in my view :)

  25. Fuck them. by azav · · Score: 1

    I know I'm not buying any.

    I don't want a thinner MacBook. I want one I can upgrade.

    I don't want a dongle laden iPhone. I want a mother fucking headphone jack.

    Honestly, the new MacBooks are shit. I buy used MacBooks from 2012 and upgrade the components and they are fine.

    Apple is fucking over their customers.

    And I'm an iOS developer.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  26. Finally??? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    What the? Apple is traditionally a hardware company and Microsoft traditionally a software company, even at its lowest sales in the 90s Apple always sold more than Microsoft, beating zero is really easy.

  27. Re: Number of fucks given: by swimboy · · Score: 1

    And Apple has had a *very* robust BSD subsystem since 2001. I'm so glad you're so excited about the Linux subsystem, my we Mac users have actually been getting work done with BSD tools for the last 15 years.

    --
    Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
  28. Re:Have they forgotten Apple have shrunk this quar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brought to you by the same pollsters that say Hillary has a 95% chance to win, Obama as a 60% approval rating and now is the PERFECT time to remove Headphone jacks.

  29. This just might be true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we considering a dongle a device now?

  30. Another bullshit trollbait article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give it up slashdot. At this point most of us are only here for the LOLs.

  31. False hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because if you compare "computers with a microsoft OS installed" to "computers installed with an apple OS" installed, MS wins.

    They are lumping in mobile devices for apple and MS into the mix...which is meaningless. That's the article writers assumption that a) a phone is a computer (to an extent it is) and b) thus, it should be included in the numbers.

    It's misleading.

    And stupid.

    p.s. crApple products suck. At least more and more of their fanbois of de-innovation are slowly moving away from them.

  32. Re:Number of fucks given: by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    I just need computers that don't actively get into my way (like OSX/iOS do)