Slashdot Mirror
Pentagon Successfully Tests Micro-Drone Swarm (phys.org)
schwit1 quotes a report from Phys.Org: The Pentagon may soon be unleashing a 21st-century version of locusts on its adversaries after officials on Monday said it had successfully tested a swarm of 103 micro-drones. The important step in the development of new autonomous weapon systems was made possible by improvements in artificial intelligence, holding open the possibility that groups of small robots could act together under human direction. Military strategists have high hopes for such drone swarms that would be cheap to produce and able to overwhelm opponents' defenses with their great numbers. The test of the micro-drone swarm in October included 103 Perdix micro-drones measuring around six inches (16 centimeters) launched from three F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jets, the Pentagon said in a statement.
explaining the joke
Oh goody goody yet more deadly weapons, we sure do need more of those! Not like the current balance of power was working or anything.
Give them all little nerve-gas-filled stingers and facial-recognition abilities and that boot stamping on our face need never lift.
WWI saw brutal mechanization and trench warfare, WWII brought us aerial bombardment and the Blitzkrieg. And now it looks like WWIII will offer up the excitement of being hunted to extinction by autonomous drones.
It seems like a co-ordinated swarm of drones would be a good way to neutralize someone who has decided to go on a shooting spree. They could either attack the shooter or simply swarm around him so that he can't see where he is going, and shooting at them wouldn't be particularly effective since they are small, fast, and there are so many of them.
Well, someday, maybe.
I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
Here's a link to a neat video of the exercise.
Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.
Ernest Hemingway
Comment removed based on user account deletion
For those of you that didnt know, commercial duckhunting was with like a 4-gauge shotcannon that awaited a flock to land abound a decoy flock and KBOOOM! Billy Mays would sell them for Pentagon drone swarm prevention.
Shillary wasn't elected. The liberal fantasy of WW3 ain't happening.
Have to give them credit, Call of Duty predicted this.
Neal Stephenson floated a similar idea in Seveneves. Rather than dumb hunks of metal, combatants would fire autonomous drone-like projectiles at their enemies that would hunt them down through foliage and around corners. And since the enemy has them too, some drone projectiles would specialize in defensive work - forming a cloud around their user, attempting to absorb projectiles or neutralize attacking drones.
In the story it was a technology developed out of necessity, for combat off-planet in enclosed spaces, where a dumb bullet would usually just punch a hole in the wall and kill everyone, attacker included.
Nice to see that we're on our way into the future!
But, unlike Hillary, he hasn't yet.
I wonder what payload the military have planned for these to carry.
Here's a picture of one and it's not what I would call "micro".
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
There's the signature nightmare and PTSD trigger for the next war.
At a few hundred dollars a pop, with a stationkeeping aerostat above them to charge them up, you could have hundreds of screaming mosquitoes blanketing the front line -all- -the- -time-. Relentless.
One should hope they're not using the same camera manufacturer who sold them cameras used to monitor the Pentagon on 9-11. Eighty five cameras at the Pentagon on 9-11 -- not one image of an airplane.
Ask China if Trump is pissing them off
Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
At least this is what I see are drones placing piloted fighter jets in same category as horse cavalrys when the tank comes along.
mfwright@batnet.com
I just asked China and they said "Meh". I asked them about Hillary and they became enraged and asked if she was with me. I said no and they calmed down.
Protoss Carriers.
Imagine a combat zone with enemy jets swooping in to find a swarm of stealthy drones each with a piece of tungsten about to be sucked into their engines. Or drones that could ignite magnesium ribbons to confuse heat seeking missiles. Drones close to the ground dragging around magnesium ribbons could make the use of rifles or any weapon that required eyesight or night vision to be useless. Drones that were a bit larger could drop tiny devices that would put a bit of something like cobra venom on any enemy below. Since a tear drop will do one drone could drop many thousands of such weapons. It would not matter if it hit a hand, a foot or a shoulder. That soldier would be dead meat.
Out of 500 that were dropped? Uh-ha.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+9%3A1-11&version=NIV
Not saying military drones are the prophesy's fulfilment, but I thought the comparison to be very interesting.
Was this a test of swarm technology or of dropping drones from an F/A 18? one did not require the other - this looks like a publicity stunt, not a test.
CARRIER HAS ARRIVED!
Putin no like. Putin will order comrade Trump to cease as soon as Gyna steal the designs from DOD!!!!
Here are a couple of videos for you:
http://911speakout.org/wp-cont...
Check YouTube for videos of the 100+ people who saw it happen while sitting in traffic.
Once this type of technology is fully developed and commonplace, it will be regularly used against civilians. Witness for example the use of chemical weapons in Syria, the use of napalm in Vietnam, the use of incendiaries in WWII, etc.
Two big drones with a really wide net.
Or many small drones dangling ropes?
Just posting out loud...
"Hated In the Nation"
yeah, but if you play classical music at them really loud, they all explode.
The Perdix drones are based on this MIT student project, which was then turned over to Lincoln Labs for further development.
You don't send in a swarm of drones to fight other drones, you send in an orange puppet to decapitate a democracy. All these military weapons are worthless if the man you put in charge works for a foreign government. It use to be called a 'decapitation strike', nowadays its done with propaganda leveraging the rivalry during an election cycle.
Intelligence chiefs have just released the synopsis part of the Russian Hacking memo. Trump's people were in constant touch with Russian government agents during the election. Russia hacked the RNC too. Trump is a Russian agent.
Trump lied yet again, when he said the Republican's weren't hacked, and he never mentioned the part of the document cataloging his interactions with Russian FSB staff.
Nope, I don't see any potential problem with AI controlled swarms of killer wasps.
in the movie Star Trek Beyond. Nothing new here.
captcha: minimum
I wonder how this swarm would standup to one of Russia's microwave beam weapons? Any guesses?
This might lead to non-lethal wars.
Remember the spider drones from minority report? Similar drones could probably be used warfare. With a few hundred thousand of those, every individual in a city could be ID:d and tracked in real time, every conversation could be recorded and analyzed, every small weapon could be found and anybody resisting or attacking drones could be targeted by hundreds of microdrones. No need to kill anyone - who could fight 100 microdrones circeling and spraying that person with pepper spray and marking color (blinding any gas mask), tazing the person and capturing him/her in a net while waiting for the bigger "collector" drone to carry the person to interrogation, permanent installaion of wrist bracelet and release into permant total surveillance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=901lYbPmqu4
My prediction of future war is first a battle for drone supremacy. When one side have established drone supremacy, the other side will probably surrender since only drones can resist the drone swarm. And no popuation will be too large to supress.
I wonder if these devices will come back to bite the people who made and implemented them?
Reminds me of the weapons described in SevenEves
60 Minutes reported on this last Sunday
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60...
The U.S. military's single greatest asset is its ability/willingness to outspend every other military on earth by a huge margin. Any weapon that's cheap to produce is bad for them. It's a weapon their enemies can get too. Democratizing warfare is not good for them.
Of course, it's not good for anyone else either. Just wait for the first terror attack where a swarm of drones flies through a city killing people.
"I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
Michael Crichton was so ahead of his time. The microdrones would need to be replaced with self-assembling nanorobots but still. Even the sound is getting close to that of his "dust devils".