Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Will Soon Lock Your PC When You Step Away From It (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: Microsoft is working on a new Windows 10 feature that will automatically lock and secure a PC when the operating system detects someone has moved away from the machine. The feature is labelled as Dynamic Lock in recent test builds of Windows 10, and Windows Central reports that Microsoft refers to this as "Windows Goodbye" internally. Microsoft currently uses special Windows Hello cameras to let Windows 10 users log into a PC with just their face. Big corporations teach employees to use the winkey+L combination to lock machines when they're idle, but this new feature will make it an automatic process. It's not clear exactly how Microsoft will detect inactivity, but it's possible the company could use Windows Hello-compatible machines or detect idle activity and lock the machine accordingly. Windows can already be configured to do this after a set time period, but it appears Microsoft is streamlining this feature into a simple setting for anyone to enable. Microsoft is planning to deliver Dynamic Lock as part of the Windows 10 Creators Update, expected to arrive in April.

172 comments

  1. Should already be habit by The-Ixian · · Score: 5, Informative

    Meta+L before you step away.

    I have even worked at places where not locking your computer when you are away from it is a fireable offence (after a few warnings).

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    1. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've worked in a place where the same is a trollable offense; many messages will be sent in your name.

    2. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It got to be a habit for me at a previous job when I had co-workers who would hope they can get their hands on an unattended machine. One poor schlub left his machine unattended while I was out at lunch. When I came back from lunch, the guy who left the machine unattended was being fired because his machine mysteriously sent nasty E-mails to C-level brass and their families, the source code he was working on was replaced with just commented out rants and checked into SVN, and copy of some phishing message with Locky attached was executed from his machine.

    3. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I worked in a place where if you try to leave your work station the guards attack you until you black out.

    4. Re:Should already be habit by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It got to be a habit for me at a previous job when I had co-workers who would hope they can get their hands on an unattended machine. One poor schlub left his machine unattended while I was out at lunch. When I came back from lunch, the guy who left the machine unattended was being fired because his machine mysteriously sent nasty E-mails to C-level brass and their families, the source code he was working on was replaced with just commented out rants and checked into SVN, and copy of some phishing message with Locky attached was executed from his machine.

      That says more about the quality of the company culture than anything else. Did someone do this because they were so pissed off at the C levels that they felt that this was a reasonable thing to do? Or did they do this because they wanted to get the victim fired - for whatever reason. And I don't know what is worse .. doing it for the lulz or doing it because of a vendetta.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:Should already be habit by zm · · Score: 2

      Over here it is normally "Hey, team.. Doughnuts for everyone at my desk tomorrow morning!"

      --
      Sig ?
    6. Re: Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know. I'm one of those guards. My baton's name is "Brainbiter".

    7. Re:Should already be habit by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      I have even worked at places where not locking your computer when you are away from it is a fireable offence (after a few warnings).

      I have even worked at places where conducting company business on a private mail server is a fire-able offense (no warnings).

      Ah, but special people permit themselves, to do special things . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    8. Re:Should already be habit by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      We used to mess with people's desktop and configuration when that happened. Setting the sender name in their email app to "IP Freely", messing with keyboard shortcuts, etc.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Should already be habit by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. I work at a place if you plug a USB stick into your workstation, the USB port will immediately locked out and security guards will show up at your desk in five minutes to take away your USB stick.

    10. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Same AC as the GP)

      It was mainly attacks of opportunity. Anyone who left anything unattended or unlocked was fair game, and because all the devs worked in one large room, there were always people looking for some mischief to make, and woe to anyone who left anything of value around. Management also tended to pit employees versus contractors, so there was a definite streak of resentment between the two groups.

      I am so glad that place is in my rear view mirror.

    11. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've worked in a place where the same is a trollable offense; many messages will be sent in your name.

      * anonymous coward is away - gone, if anyone talks in the next 25 minutes as me it's bm being an asshole

    12. Re:Should already be habit by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a lot of hate for a co-worker... he must have been a real dick (hopefully anyway...)

      The "accepted" prank for the unattended, unlocked workstation was usually just an e-mail to the team saying "lunch is on me guys" har har

      Or maybe rotate their display port by 90 degrees.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    13. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My favorite is taking a screen shot of their desktop with the current app open, making that their background, hiding the taskbar, and watch the fun as they think their computer is locked up.

    14. Re:Should already be habit by gnick · · Score: 1

      Sounds like government. That's where I ran into those measures - DoE.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    15. Re:Should already be habit by iamgnat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Screwing with people is a time honored past time in geek culture.

      Screwing with someone's livelihood is not cool.

      The anecdote you supplied goes way beyond "fair game" and "mischief" and is simply disgusting.

    16. Re:Should already be habit by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Last job, we tended to run a youporn video fullscreen on unlocked machines.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    17. Re:Should already be habit by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Sounds like government. That's where I ran into those measures - DoE.

      I can neither confirm nor deny. ;)

    18. Re:Should already be habit by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 2

      Meta+L before you step away.

      I have even worked at places where not locking your computer when you are away from it is a fireable offence (after a few warnings).

      I have seen the chief of security frig around with unsecured workstations. (Set background to screenshot of itself, hide icons and start bar, email President from offender's account, etc).

      What I run into it how many people's minds are blown when I show them Winkey+L instead of the Ctrl+Alt+Del,Enter. Same people have their mind blown at Ctrl+Shift+Esc instead of Ctrl+Alt+Del, "Start Task Manager"

    19. Re:Should already be habit by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Bet it didn't work on rubber duckies. Just USB storage.

      Rubber duckies look like keyboards to the computer.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The anecdote you supplied goes way beyond "fair game" and "mischief" and is simply disgusting.

      It's like you've never dealt with office politics before. If you aren't sleeping your way to the top you might as well get some poor bastards fired.

    21. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FFS, I just recently started using Windows and Meta+L is the shortcut to focus on the browser URI bar in macos, and there's no way to rebind the windows one.

      It took me a couple of weeks to recondition my muscle memory not to get fucked in the ass by an OS that doesn't even support changing key bindings.

    22. Re:Should already be habit by DeathElk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thanks for the heads up. I've got new material for the screening tests. A potential employee with that kind of attitude has no place in our (or any) organisation.

    23. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine any workplace requiring people to lock their computers when they walk away from them will also not allow the computers to have cameras or other sensor devices hooked up. So, not sure who the intended client would be for such a system.

    24. Re:Should already be habit by dbIII · · Score: 1

      One fairly harmless but amusing classic was putting a desktop screenshot of a Mac on a PC and vice versa - fullscreen so it looked like it was the desktop. It used to be easy when everybody was back on 1024x768.

    25. Re:Should already be habit by WolfgangVL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's fucking terrible. If I even saw that kind of shit from the other side of the room I would demand the little-dick prankster fuck be walked out or I quit on the spot. What a horrible environment to work in. This trash speaks to the (in)ability of your management team, the fuck-each-other-over-as-hard-as-you-can corporate bonus games that have permeated the tech industry, and your personal lack of integrity, knowing it all went down like that and not speaking up to put the real offender in the hotseat instead of watching the victims career nose-dive cuz he forgot to lock his system.

      Totally should already be a habit, and is a requirement at every single serious tech job I've ever worked, but the first offence is maybe inverting some colors and flipping the monitor sideways, not taking kill-shots at your coworkers livelihood, destroying company source-code and sending email to managements families.

      Anybody quietly aware of this action is an accomplice, and deserving of termination as well.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    26. Re:Should already be habit by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I have even worked at places where conducting company business on a private mail server is a fire-able offense (no warnings).

      I worked in a place where managers dictate policy and sometimes get to ignore those policies.
      I think it's called nearly every workplace everywhere.

      Get over the trivia you'll see some real scandals soon based on some of the appointments.

    27. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We used to mess with people's desktop and configuration when that happened. Setting the sender name in their email app to "IP Freely", messing with keyboard shortcuts, etc.

      If the machines were still running Windows 3.1 for Workgroups, you'd be that guy who'd switch everyone's color scheme to Hot Dog Stand, just for laughs.

    28. Re:Should already be habit by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Even better, on iwndows, put a desktop screenshot as their background, hide the status bar and all of their icons, and watch them click everywhere they can while nothing works.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    29. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I run into it how many people's minds are blown when I show them Winkey+L instead of the Ctrl+Alt+Del,Enter.

      I was one of them. By the way, I think L is the combo under Gnome (you're welcome)
      What saddens me is that there's so little discoverability with these tricks. Those are just buried who-knows-where so you get the tribal knowledge by coworker word of mouth when you're already on the inside, or by random web-browsing as you're looking for other things. Think of Windows key shortcuts. Up till Windows 8 I think there were just a few, so I was unaware that W8 added a whole bunch.

      But back at discoverability, it saddens me that with all text now gone from menus, or menu icons replaced by hamburgers, and even the menus gone altogether (thanks, Google et copycats > _ < ). Long gone are the days when you'd see menu shortcuts.

    30. Re:Should already be habit by antdude · · Score: 1

      Also, they force their screen savers to autolock after ten minutes. Sometimes, we forget to do lock manually.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    31. Re: Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      close explorer.exe hehe you will need to use shortcut keys to run it again.

    32. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting somebody fired isn't "mischief". It's naked aggression. He was better of not working with you clowns.

    33. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just lock out the USB port in the first place if they don't want people using them?

    34. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you, Dronebama?

      No worry. Soon you're going to get discharged.

    35. Re:Should already be habit by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Meta+L before you step away.

      I have even worked at places where not locking your computer when you are away from it is a fireable offence (after a few warnings).

      I have seen the chief of security frig around with unsecured workstations. (Set background to screenshot of itself, hide icons and start bar, email President from offender's account, etc).

      What I run into it how many people's minds are blown when I show them Winkey+L instead of the Ctrl+Alt+Del,Enter. Same people have their mind blown at Ctrl+Shift+Esc instead of Ctrl+Alt+Del, "Start Task Manager"

      Depends on what operating system you are running. Meta+L does not work on mine but my lock screen icon does or if I wish I can use Ctrl+Alt+Del and select what I want to do. I can also setup inactivity timeouts if I am working in a place where some people like to prank your computer if left unattended.

      I am sure you have guessed by now I don't run Microsoft Windows. :-)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    36. Re:Should already be habit by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always politics...

    37. Re:Should already be habit by AlphaBro · · Score: 1

      This is far beyond your typical corporate politicking. Sounds like you work with some toxic idiots.

    38. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like You should be castrated with a rusty spoon.

    39. Re:Should already be habit by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      Microsoft refers to this as "Windows Goodbye" internally

      "Windows 10 Goodbye"? How about Windows 10 F**k Off, I'd certainly want that as a feature of Windows. Followed by something involving a Linux Mint ISO.

    40. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a difference in culture? I've always worked in places were you didn't need to lock your screen and where everyone trusted each other to not troll. If someone locked his/her screen, people became curious: "What does he/she need to hide?"

    41. Re:Should already be habit by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Why wouldn't they just disable the USB port to begin with?

    42. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meta+L before you step away.

      I have even worked at places where not locking your computer when you are away from it is a fireable offence (after a few warnings).

      I've never really understood this culture.
      If you have people that can't be trusted running around with physical access to the computers, what good with locking the login do?
      Isn't it the one who let those persons in that should be fired?

      Anyway, I agree that we already have a manual way of doing it, and more importantly, it is optional.
      Luckily I don't use windows 10, but I would hate for my computer at home to lock me out every time I go away to grab some coffee or whatnot.
      We all have different use cases. I even want my work computer to work differently from my home computers.
      I really dislike getting "helpful" features pushed on me. Let me decide how my computer works.

    43. Re:Should already be habit by Minupla · · Score: 1

      I have seen the chief of security frig around with unsecured workstations.

      Hey - I resemble that remark, although my current goto is ctl-alt-left arrow. I assume no responsibility for neck injuries resulting from use of the aforementioned keyboard combo. :)

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    44. Re:Should already be habit by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      Or change their desktop background to something involving a sexy The Hoff image.

    45. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We always just sent obvious joke emails to people that we knew were cool and would get a laugh out of it. Aside from that, I've worked with a fair number of people of the type that if someone screwed them over that bad and got them fired in the way the GP mentioned, they would find out who did it through someone still at the company, and then feed the perpetrator's still-attached dick to the garbage disposal.

    46. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the smartcard Stazi at the DWP.

      Walk away from machine to printer 5m away. Leave smartcard in PC.

      Grabbed and taken to finance. Where you have to sign for it and a report is sent to your line manager.

    47. Re:Should already be habit by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I don't even need to do that. I login via my Lincpass. When I leave my desk, I yank out the card, and the computer locks. Since it's a Windows box, it sometimes glitches and I do have to do Win + L, but it usually locks on card removal.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    48. Re:Should already be habit by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Yeah, mine does that. Which can be a bit of a PITA when I'm in one of those teleconferences and don't wiggle the mouse enough.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    49. Re:Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you work with a) sociopaths, b) people who don't recognize sociopathic behaviour and c) those who do recognize it but tolerate it anyway.

      Holy shit that's awesome! If you are a sociopath yourself, that is.

    50. Re:Should already be habit by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Why wouldn't they just disable the USB port to begin with?

      Need working USB ports for keyboard, mouse and security token (admin access).

    51. Re: Should already be habit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I used to work, a storage company now owned by Dell, if you left your screen unlocked you had to pay for lunch. It wasn't a company policy,'but in my department we all followed it. My first week of work I had to pay for 2 lunches. After that never again.

    52. Re:Should already be habit by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      I blow people's minds with Alt+Tab on a regular basis, and I'm not talking about grandma, these are people fresh out of school who I guess never learned anything past launching an app on their iThing.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    53. Re:Should already be habit by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Hey - I resemble that remark, although my current goto is ctl-alt-left arrow. I assume no responsibility for neck injuries resulting from use of the aforementioned keyboard combo. :)

      I have no idea why Intel ever made this a fucking shortcut. I have never in my life seen anyone use this function intentionally. I have seen countless people accidentally hit it, with no idea how to get back.

      Most recently was a forklift driver.

      Forklift driver on radio : "Uhh maintenance, the screen on my forklift is showing sideways"
      Electrician: "Uhh. What?"
      Me to electrician: "Tell him to press Ctrl+alt+up arrow"
      Electrician: "Uhh. Try Ctrl+alt+up arrow"
      Forklift driver: "Wow. That fixed it"

    54. Re:Should already be habit by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      What saddens me is that there's so little discoverability with these tricks. Those are just buried who-knows-where so you get the tribal knowledge by coworker word of mouth when you're already on the inside, or by random web-browsing as you're looking for other things. Think of Windows key shortcuts. Up till Windows 8 I think there were just a few, so I was unaware that W8 added a whole bunch.

      At some point I start looking up keyboard hot-key lists. Always trying to find tricks to make things quicker. The random web-browsing as you say. Best one for >=W8 is Win+X which shows the same menu as right clicking the bottom left corner of the screen. Ready access to lots of power user functions. I don't think they have even gotten around to fucking it up in W10 yet.

      But back at discoverability, it saddens me that with all text now gone from menus, or menu icons replaced by hamburgers, and even the menus gone altogether (thanks, Google et copycats > _ < ). Long gone are the days when you'd see menu shortcuts.

      Agree on the useless discover-ability. Everything now must be "Me no know how to read. Me need point and grunt screen" (que appy app guy). I like how menus used to shows Ctrl+ hotkeys, and pressing alt would highlight alt-key shortcuts. I also dislike how function keys are now a second class citizen. Instead the buttons primary function is volume up, volume down, or they are doubled up on the number keys.

    55. Re:Should already be habit by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      I agreed with you up to the last statement. Such policies are no better than the consequences they're meant to prevent.

    56. Re:Should already be habit by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

      I agreed with you up to the last statement. Such policies are no better than the consequences they're meant to prevent.

      In normal circumstances, extremes are bad, I agree. But when peoples families get involved, things can escalate to the point of gunfire before anybody even has a handle on what happened. Silence is consent. That quiet dude who just got walked out could be making a list on his way home. The manager who had to explain those emails to his family is coming after the team-leader in the morning, and who even knows what kind of shit the perp and his little accomplices are going to pull next.

      I head a team, and I discussed this story with them over our meeting this morning. It was a hell of a way to remind them that fuck-fuck games are all good and well for solving problems at the lowest level, but sometimes it's easy to cross a line, and some lines should never be crossed.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  2. Was effectivly available 12 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back then you could set up a pc to require an ID smart card to log in, and if the ID card was needed to navigate the building it had the same effect. The megacorp I was working for was in the process of implementing this when I left. Instead of a password it had a pin.

  3. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Very useful for malware. Now there is a built in function to trigger them mining trojans.

  4. This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If you have a short-range radio like bluetooth on your PC and phone, it should be trivial to monitor for a loss of connectivity.

    The hard part is that it would drain both your phone's battery and, if it was a laptop running on battery, its battery.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by mlts · · Score: 1

      Blackberry has had some hardware/software that they sold, in effort to replace CACs/PIVs with their devices, which did a similar thing. Walk off with your phone, the screen locked. Come back, the machine will wake up and ask for your PIN. They were hawking this for about ten years now.

    2. Re:This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Unless you leave your phone at your desk for a minute (probably not a good idea either, but...).

    3. Re:This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by eneville · · Score: 0

      BTLE is quite low power. Oh, I see what you're saying, it's MS code so the driver will drain the battery due to rubbish out-the-door binaries.

    4. Re:This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Generally when you're sitting at a desk, your laptop and phone are connected to mains power.

      Anyhow, desktop Linux has had a system tray widget for bluetooth screen locking for a number of years.

    5. Re: This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The battery drain comes from the telemetry as they send your contact list to their servers every 10 minutes.

    6. Re:This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by quenda · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth range is too great. You need to know if the user has left the desk or room.
      Best alternative to the camera would be active infrared sensors, as used on Moto X phones.
      They are low power, would detect when you move away, and let you keep the tape over your webcam.

    7. Re: This is nearly-trivial with bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably infra like public toilets. though it would have to be something common cams ya most laptops though not as many desktops unless all in ones mostly there external eccessories. got me what there thinking.

  5. lol windows and the word lockdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    it never fails to draw a smile on my face

    1. Re:lol windows and the word lockdown by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Windows already goes into the login screen if it's left long enough that the powersaver kicks in

  6. This is a pretty good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would indeed be great for any sort of business/public environment.
    Not so much at home, for those who live alone.
    As long as it is optional, I have no complaints. More built-in features is better for the consumers after all. Instead of leaving the users in the dark about potential features, forcing them to go out of their way to look the features up and then manually downloading them.

    1. Re:This is a pretty good idea by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

      While I agree it's smart to lockdown your workstation in a business environment, I've worked in some where this tech will be abused to time track employees who spent 3 minutes too long in the restroom.

      That said, they already ran shitty 3rd party software that tracked mouse and keystrokes so maybe nothing changes. Oh man did we lose some developers who treated it as a challenge and scripted activity (poorly) while they were afk. I suppose there are probably some more clever devs plugging along with better scripting. Though if they are that clever they would have gotten the fuck out of that work environment.

      The real killer tech will be the unskippable ads that 'helpfully' pause themselves while you don't have eyeballs on them, and resume when you're back at the computer...

  7. This already happens by TodPunk · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's called a screen-saver which turns off the display and requires a password, and it's been a feature of Windows since at least 2000/XP. It can also be set by group policy. "Inactivity" as questioned in TFS is just defined as "not providing any input" for a certain amount of time.

    Why is this news? Because people that didn't know it existed will now have it set by default? OK, good. They should, and they likely won't know what happened anyway. They'll wiggle the mouse or whatever it is they do when they work on a computer that doesn't do this and click their name because they don't have a password set, or who knows what else.

    Unless they're going the stupid route and not making this the same as current "unlock" functionality, but then I don't get the comparison to Winkey+L

    --
    This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
    1. Re:This already happens by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      This already happens

      It seems no-one actually knows for sure what this does, but it seems likely it's a bit more than just "lock after a x minutes of no keyboard/mouse input." It probably keeps checking via the webcam for your face, and if it doesn't see you for a while, it locks.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:This already happens by Kjella · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing the idea is that this will be much quicker, like if you haven't touched the mouse or keyboard for like 10-60 seconds the camera will check if you're still sitting in front of it and if not lock the machine. I think this is a business winner, so many times I've seen laptops with aggressive screen savers being used in a meeting by someone presenting and it locks because the presenter was talking or taking questions or holding a discussion and not navigating. This way the machine could check yep he's still there, let's NOT lock the machine.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:This already happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before it used to be a timeout counter, this probably uses the cam (if any) and facial recognition.

      Another thing I'm going to have to disable....

      I would switch to Linux, but Visual Studio is what makes my job a little less unbearable.

    4. Re:This already happens by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's called a screen-saver which turns off the display and requires a password, and it's been a feature of Windows since at least 2000/XP.

      OH you mean the feature people push out as far as possible because it's annoying when it comes on while you're sitting at your desk and happen to be looking up something or writing something down for a second? That feature that leaves a computer exposed for a preset amount of time that becomes a juggling act between security and convenience?

      Why is this news?

      Because it doesn't already happen, it hasn't existed in the past, and what does exist doesn't work. Corporate security is a big deal that can't be fixed by simply expecting users to lock their computers.

    5. Re:This already happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this news? Because people that didn't know it existed will now have it set by default? OK, good. They should, and they likely won't know what happened anyway.

      If you read the article, I get the impression it is a excuse by Microsoft to have the webcam/mike on and monitoring your workspace 24/7, to better serve you ads of course.

    6. Re:This already happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this news?

      Because the default security standard is 30 minutes for auto-lock. This reduces it down to ... 3 seconds or so. Don't believe this is significant? Give me a week with a large enough office of cubicles around lunchtime (and where security is lacking already anyways) and I promise you I'll own several machines on that network by the end of the week.

    7. Re:This already happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a screen-saver which turns off the display and requires a password, and it's been a feature of Windows since at least 2000/XP.

      It existed in Win 3.1 also, possibly even earlier than that.

      I recall a prank from back then. The lock timeout was specified in seconds in control.ini (IIRC) and setting it to '1' made the screen lock immediately when you stopped moving the mouse. Great fun.

    8. Re:This already happens by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      There's a Windows feature that avoids this (equivalent is present on Linux WMs several years before...)

    9. Re:This already happens by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      the default can't be changed?

  8. Monitor by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

    It's not clear exactly how Microsoft will detect inactivity, but it's possible the company could use Windows Hello-compatible machines or detect idle activity and lock the machine accordingly.

    My monitor at work has the ability to detect if someone is sitting within a certain distance from it. If no-one is in range then after a couple of minutes it would automatically turn off the screen. The distance can be defined in the settings.

    I'm sure there are a small number of people on here (who will likely comment) whose working patterns means that this wouldn't work for them - but it seemed to work for the 500 odd people we have on the floor.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Monitor by eneville · · Score: 1

      but it seemed to work for the 500 odd people we have on the floor.

      500 people must require a fair bit of space, how does it work for the one closest and furthest away? Seems like it wouldn't work well when you wander over to a neighbouring colleague.

    2. Re:Monitor by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are a small number of people on here (who will likely comment) whose working patterns means that this wouldn't work for them

      The idea of Windows Goodbye is that it is coupled with Windows Hello. It's about your computer tying directly into your working pattern dynamically. Look away / walk away and the screen locks. Look back / walk back and the screen unlocks.

      I already unlock my girlfriends Surface Pro 4 by swiping on the screen and then holding it up to her face. Though I admit it annoys her, especially when I laugh about it afterwards.

  9. This has gone far enough! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Windows 10 Will Soon Lock Your PC When You Step Away From It

    Bloody hell, will it? Even though I'm running Windows 7/Centos 7? That's very clever.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:This has gone far enough! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Windows 10 Will Soon Lock Your PC When You Step Away From It

      Bloody hell, will it? Even though I'm running Windows 7/Centos 7? That's very clever.

      Windows 10 will soon install itself on your PC when you step away from it, even though you are running Windows 7/Centos 7.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:This has gone far enough! by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I thought that was what happened last year?

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    3. Re: This has gone far enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come November OpenBSD 7.0 will be out. You can have the OS version 7 trifecta!

  10. No. This is Different. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This isn't a screen saver time out. This is presence detection. It won't wait a configured (10) minutes of inactivity to lock the screen. The camera "sees" the user and even knows which user it is seeing. The camera then locks the screen immediately when the user is not present.

    I'm curious though, if this can be easily defeated with a picture of the user being used to unlock the PC?

    1. Re:No. This is Different. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If your computer has a camera focused on your at work and you haven't put tape over it, then it's time to do so.

  11. Privacy by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    If they use your webcam to monitor your activity then this will be a privacy nightmare. I will duct tape my camera if it comes to that or better yet just disable the option if it comes enabled

    1. Re:Privacy by gtall · · Score: 1

      And it is DoD policy to tape over all webcams to the monitor.

    2. Re: Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an older HP netbook whose camera has failed. It has failed in a fashion that it locks up the machine hard during a cold boot. The only way to get the machine to power on and boot into windows was to dig into the display bezel and permanently disconnect the camera.

      It isn't that hard to pry up the bezel on a computer display and kill the camera. It generally doesn' t even damage the display housing.

  12. evil bastards at microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is this is just an excuse for them to run a webcam permently on your computer and watch everything.. so over this Microsoft fuckery

  13. Yay for privacy by TheEdgeOfRage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is going to be so good if they use webcams like for Hello. Which means they get to look at you 24/7 with your consent.

    1. Re: Yay for privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be a way to turn the webcam off. If not, MS would be saying goodbye to government customers, the defense industry and I'm sure a whole bunch of other companies that have concerns about industrial espionage.

    2. Re: Yay for privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus Slashdotters who don't want to be seen jacking off in their parents basement

    3. Re: Yay for privacy by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      It's called duct tape.

  14. It will cause issues on first implemenation. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    I predict the usual Microsoft screwups with their initial roll-out of this.
    People's computers will blackout the screen during extended video playback, especially HTPC users sitting back away from their computers.

    1. Re:It will cause issues on first implemenation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how Hello has issues if I am not looking at my computer directly, I can see this being a real pain in the tookus. You're at a LAN party and you frag a friend. You look over to give him that, "I ownz you" look, and your system locks up.

  15. Congratulations,your PC is now a governance device by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The camera "sees" the user and even knows which user it is seeing. The camera then locks the screen immediately when the user is not present.

    How long before the computer "sees" the user and notifies the police that they can pick up their known dissident. I mean, really, given the kind of governance we're about to enter into, this (not to mention Alexa-like audio surveillance "features") are the last thing I'd want on any equipment in my home.

    And no, I don't have anything to hide. But conversely, I also don't use the restroom in the middle of 5th Avenue. Privacy is a thing, even in a world full of morons who think it isn't.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  16. Seriously? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    It's times like this that I'm happy my work's IT department is mildly incompetent. We just finished the Windows 7 rollout last year and they're still patting themselves on their backs.

    Figure that by the time they are ready to go to the next version of Windows I'll be retired.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  17. Re: No big corporation will ever use Windows 10. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company is gradually transitioning to Windows 10 in every division. But I guess 120,000 employees is not big.

  18. Re:No big corporation will ever use Windows 10. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've started a transition of 41,500 boxes to Win10.

  19. A long time ago... by Knightman · · Score: 1

    https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/10/15/2121214/sonar-software-detects-laptop-user-presence

    Actually been using it although it drove a co-worker batty because he heard the high-frequency ticks and he couldn't find the source.. ;)

    --
    --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
  20. Duct tape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either Duct tape over the prying eye or a mechanical shutter seems reasonable.

    Locking your computer says you don't trust the folks working around you.
    That doesn't sound like a nice place to be.

    Corporate policy enforcing such is a sad commentary on the state of things.
    That Microsoft would think this is a useful and necessary feature, an even sadder one.

    Seems like the way to fix that problem is to pick a better place, not a better locking.

    1. Re:Duct tape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Locking your computer says you don't trust the folks working around you.
      Locking your company computer says that there could be at least one person who has access to your space who may have malicious intent, at some point over a multi-decade career. Locking your personal computer is just fucking common sense.

      > That doesn't sound like a nice place to be.
      The only place I didn't lock my computer was college, and I pretty much had porn (often gay porn) set as my background nonstop as a result. That was hilarious, of course. I could trust all my friends who had access to it not to pry through my files or mess my shit up. At work, things are different: there could be someone who has malicious intent towards my organization, for instance.

      > Corporate policy enforcing such is a sad commentary on the state of things.
      It's really common sense.

    2. Re: Duct tape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good corporate policy shitcans employees caught fucking in unauthorized ways on coworker's workstations.

  21. How well does it work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How well does it work with black tape over the camera?

  22. Re:Congratulations,your PC is now a governance dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This just gives them a plausible excuse to snap your picture every second and send it to headquarters for "security validation". For the best possible user experience, of course. File this under "do not want".

  23. so they are not spying on me by Idisagree · · Score: 2

    but they are constantly monitoring/recording my movements.

    I don't see any issues here, do you?

    1. Re:so they are not spying on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mate these evil bastards wont stop until they own you from your waking moment to your sleep... its nothing short of pure evil.

  24. Big corporations by jlv · · Score: 1

    Big corporations teach employees to use the winkey+L combination to lock machines when they're idle

    Only big corporations teach that?

  25. Finally A Microsoft Product I Can Support! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Windows Goodbye"

  26. Automatic Light Switches by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Would indeed be great for any sort of business/public environment.

    Not it it works as well as automatic lights which, at least where I work, seem to stay on over night without anyone in my office and then regularly turn off every ~30 minutes or so when I am in the office. If I have to keep waving at the computer as well as the lights to prove I am still there it is not going to improve my productivity.

  27. Just great. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Now my PC will be watching me at the keyboard. What's next, having it watch me sleep?

    And... Just to throw in my $0.02, both the Windows "Hello" and proposed "Goodbye" features sound pretty troublesome.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Just great. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Now my PC will be watching me at the keyboard. What's next, having it watch me sleep?

      Worse, now they'll know when you're catching some zzzs at your keyboard.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  28. Camera or IR sensor?.. by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 2

    I'm not keen at having any more cameras pointed at me -- but if there was something very simple like an IR sensor that can detect presence/motion/etc, then this might be useful....

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
    1. Re:Camera or IR sensor?.. by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      As long as it can be switched off...

    2. Re:Camera or IR sensor?.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You can buy Bluetooth low energy tags for this purpose for a few quid. The range is deliberately low.

      It's not a bad system really, a kind of low grade two factor auth in that someone who only knows your password can't trivially unlock your computer.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Camera or IR sensor?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks :)

  29. Better than a timeout by Webmoth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the idea is that if you are at your desk but idle (say, for example, you're on a long phone call with your chair tipped back and your feet on the desk), the computer won't lock down after X minutes of inactivity passes. But if you step away, it locks within seconds. You probably want to have some delay before locking, just in case you bend down to tie your shoe or something else where you are out of the view of the camera for a moment.

    The problem with the typical timeout we've used for years is that it can leave the desktop vulnerable between the time you leave the computer and the timeout expires. Most places set the timeout to several minutes to avoid employee irritation of having to unlock their computers several times a day, just because they were doing something else even though the computer was never out of their sight. A timeout is, at best, a compromise between security and convenience.

    This new method has the potential to improve BOTH security and convenience.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:Better than a timeout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I also want it to be configurable. In an office env where it is required this would be decent. At home I run with a simple power off of the screen and no lock.

      As long as it is an 'add' and 'configurable' I am cool with this new feature. Sounds like a win if it is that way.

    2. Re:Better than a timeout by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Actually, I got a replacement mac with newer OS on it, and I did not restore all the settings I had over the years and wanted to start out fresh. First thing I noticed is that it doesn't lock me out instantly when the laptop is closed. Instead I can now walk from cubicle to meeting room and not have to unlock the screen, but if closed for a minute then it locks. This may seem minor but I was quite happy with it. No more people watching while I type in the password (or accidentally typing the first few chars of password into the username box, or trying 10 times in a row because I forgot that I changed it the day before, etc).

  30. Sole user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm retired, and the only user of this PC. Anyone else will be forced to dance with Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson.

    1. Re:Sole user by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

      Mr Uzi and Miss Sten prefer you to demonstrate your moves.

  31. "Windows Goodbye"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I very much feel like doing a "Goodbye, Windows", but unfortunately, it has a total monopoly and Linux is a pathetic joke as well.

  32. Don't secure any system by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Just make the punishment for hacking extremely high. It worked for narcotics right.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Don't secure any system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a common misconception and it isn't limited to the war on drugs.
      If you look at things like rape and murder there are plenty of people who will voice their opinion in favor of stronger punishment as if that would work as a deterrent.
      The thing that works if you want to stop something is to increase the risk of getting caught. Not increasing the punishment if you are caught.
      If people believe that they will get away with it it doesn't matter what the punishment is.
      The thing every repeat offender have in common is that they believe that "this time I won't get caught".

    2. Re:Don't secure any system by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Well there is some differences in the comparison. With violent crime much of it occurs in "the heat of the moment", by people who have very poor impulse control. Often people who commit violent crimes don't consider the possibility of getting caught, so the consequences are irrelevant. Those people need to get caught, if only to prove their assumptions wrong.
      With non-violent crime, the is more calculation going on. People who break into homes while you are on vacation do so because they planned it out to minimize their risk. White collar criminal who embezzle or who do illegal stock trades always put some effort into avoiding getting caught, even if their efforts are ineffective.
      I would classify hacking for profit as a white collar crime and hacking for entertainment as a misguided seeking of knowledge (I sympathize strongly with that type).

      What I don't like about attempts by governments to increase the chances of catching hackers, is that my privacy and freedom is often sacrificed to reach that goal. I want it both ways, maximum freedom and minimum risk.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  33. This should be great for the helpdesk by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    How will this work when Mary calls the helpdesk, and as soon as Victor the desktop tech sits down the screen locks because Mary isn't the one sitting there?

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  34. Re:No big corporation will ever use Windows 10. by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    How did your two companies handle the telemtry feature?

  35. Evil Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Trust me... this is all about creating a world wide facial recognition database... fucking evil scum suckers.

  36. I prefer 'Goodbye, Windows' to 'Windows Goodbye' by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    As in 'Goodbye forever, don't let the virtual door hit you in the virtual ass on the way out'.

    This week they literally forced us onto Windows 10, in the most fascist way possible: Remotely bricking our machines. Bastards. Windows 10 makes my eyes bleed..

  37. Re:Congratulations,your PC is now a governance dev by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Electrical tape over your camera, friend. Problem solved.

  38. Re:No big corporation will ever use Windows 10. by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Why would most companies care about telemetry being sent back to MS?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  39. Re:Congratulations,your PC is now a governance dev by roman_mir · · Score: 0

    There was a story on /. not too far back about Linux on desktop and before that there was this story - an MS exec urging developers who use Linux to switch to Windows 10 and the idea was that supposedly Windows 10 provides a shell now that is as good as bash (supposedly).

    I said it then and will say it again: bash is not the only thing that Linux provides me with. I've been exclusively on Linux for about 15 years now and bash is only a small part of it, and part of it is that the OS is not trying to spy on me like this.

  40. Tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder how well this feature works considering I put electrical tape over the cameras :|

  41. Will it ACTUALLY work now? by Qzukk · · Score: 2

    My office computer is set to lock on wake and lock on screensaver, and some days I'll forget to win+L and come in to work the next morning, wiggle the mouse to wake the monitor, and the computer will not be locked.

    This isn't new to Windows 10, either. My 8.1 laptop, when I open the lid there's a 50/50 chance it will automatically unlock itself. I open the lid, the screen turns on to the clearly labeled "This computer is locked" screen, which will then sometimes within a second or so slide up automatically without me touching a thing.

    If it happened every single time then obviously I fucked up on the configuration, but when it only sometimes works, I'd like to know what the hell is going on.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    1. Re:Will it ACTUALLY work now? by turp182 · · Score: 1

      I have that same problem on occasion, where Win+L fails (while appearing to be successful). Same experience, it can fail for 8+ hours.

      I'm back to Ctrl-Alt-Del then Enter once the security screen comes up, never fails in my experience.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  42. Hello Cameras!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about mass public surveillance (with your permission). Apple has all of our fingerprints and microsoft will have all of our retinas. How cool!

  43. mouse orientation by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Remember when back in the windows 3.1 days, when you could set the orientation of the mouse, and you'd have that little race car thingy that would help you do it? My favorite, besides the background screen grab one you mentioned, was when someone walked away, turn the mouse 180 degrees, and then set the orientation. When they came back, the look on their face when the mouse moved LEFT, then they moved it RIGHT, DOWN when they moved it UP was priceless!

    1. Re:mouse orientation by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Change default language and hide the language bar...
      Makes a great test of their Control Panel memorization.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    2. Re:mouse orientation by Minupla · · Score: 1

      My replacement is changing the screen rotation. As much fun, and more visual. Also it has a handy hotkey. Ctl-Alt-Left arrow. Quick and easy to do on a walk-by.

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  44. Privacy loss? They're doing it to themselves. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Snowden confirmed beyond any doubt that Microsoft is an NSA partner and spying is big business (that's why the NSA has so many partners amongst software proprietors). We all knew Microsoft was and is a software proprietor. After this 'feature' becomes commonplace it will be easier to convince people that they don't need or want that pesky indicator light next to the camera/mic showing when the camera/mic is on. After all, it's always lit and therefore 'useless'.

    A right and proper view would say you can't trust software proprietors (yes, as long as the corporate repeater sites like /. keep publishing the same kinds of stories, they'll merit the same responses because these stories all have the same lack of software freedom at their core). That indicator light was always under proprietary software control anyway, so you couldn't ever really trust the device wasn't on even when the light was off. Increasingly computers are a user-accepted means of spying on people in their homes, their cars, their workplace, and anywhere else they travel. A combination of desktop and portable computers all running proprietary, user-subjugating OSes with built-in cameras/mics has made this degree of spying viable for years. Consider the power of data collection in your tracker (or, less honestly: "cell phone"/"mobile phone") which primarily tracks your location many times a minute (via GPS and cell tower triangulation); this device has a mic you don't control and can't determine when it's on. The computer is very capable of secretly recording and sending audio data. Most trackers have video cameras too, with predictable benefit for spying. People can be monitored all-day every day, even while they sleep (some people sleep in front of a "smart" TV with a computer and camera/mic built into it, because that makes the TV "smart"!). They also have a charging tracker next to them all night long (because they're desperate to believe that they need to be reachable all the time).

    Sadly, there are too many IT people who haven't thought this through and value minor conveniences over privacy. Knowing when such monitoring is beneficial and when it's harmful is beyond the scope of allowable debate in the corporate media, and there's simply no room for teaching people about software freedom or why we should value software freedom for its own sake. IT pros should help teach people what's possible here, not act as a bulwark for proprietors, spies, and push deeper user subjugation.

  45. not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in a buisness corp setting its a good idea at home nah unless its a work computer. there are good practices and good out comes this adresses one but if some one is having issues locking screening therexomputer what other practices are they having issues with.

    neat feature though non the less.

  46. Windows 10 directives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Serve the corporate trust
    2) Protect microsoft
    3) Uphold the law (by spying on everyone)

  47. Lock Screen 100% Effective! by b783719 · · Score: 1

    typing, pause, LOCK SCREEN, unlock screen,
    typing, pause, LOCK SCREEN, unlock screen,
    typing, pause, LOCK SCREEN, unlock screen,

    SoB, just because you can't see me, doesn't mean I'm not there.

    1. Re:Lock Screen 100% Effective! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      SoB, just because you can't see me, doesn't mean I'm not there.

      The Ninja Labor Union will sue Microsoft soon.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  48. And... by moneybabylon · · Score: 0

    ...you will have to pay 2 bitcoin to get back into your computer or the data will be encrypted.

  49. Re:No big corporation will ever use Windows 10. by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

    Why would most companies care about telemetry being sent back to MS?

    Because you don't know what the fuck's being sent. It might be transmitting \\COKEWAN\Corp\ATL\CocaColaRecipe.txt and all of your other trade secrets directly to Microsoft. Why risk that?

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  50. Re:Congratulations,your PC is now a governance dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Electrical tape over your camera, friend. Problem solved.

    Windows refuses to install if you don't create a Hotmail account or whatever they call it these days. Windows 11 or 12 can refuse to run if it cannot see your face. Most people will put up with it.

  51. Requires an active video camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So basically, to enable a feature that addresses a careless user problem, MS would like you to have your camera enabled at all time. With the camera you also enable the sound .... creating a total and complete privacy problem in the process.

    Yeah, lets have the camera and microphone enable at all time just to keep a few careless people happy.

  52. Lock when walking away isn't new. by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    Linux has had a Bluetooth package for running scripts when a paired device is outside or inside an estimated parameter for about 10 years. Hell, even my custom distro that I built as an amateur has it. Also, Linux has had facial recognition for login for years, but no one with half a brain would trust something like that, especially with Micro$oft, to which also is partnered up with Conanical, Ubuntu's main supporter of well...everything about it. I really wish Micro$oft (Apple too) would stop making it look like they came up with something new when they just still ideas from the Linux and open source communities. TheOuterLinux.com

  53. Really?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Microsoft you are 10 years behind!! We have been using USB devices on our system for 10 years that do this. No need for fancy camera software etc. Upgraded 2 years ago now using our ID badges.

  54. Windows Goodbye by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    "Windows Goodbye" sounds like a nice name for a Linux distro.

    Windows 10 feature that will automatically lock and secure a PC when the operating system detects someone has moved away from the machine

    Hopefully it isn't like those automatic toilets that flush and splash your ass when you reach for the toilet paper.

    1. Re:Windows Goodbye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Windows Goodbye" sounds like a nice name for a Linux distro.

      For consistency, I'll never use a distro with the word 'Windows' in its name.

  55. Can you turn it off? by johannesg · · Score: 2

    Or is this another mandatory feature? Because I totally hate it when my screen locks every five seconds. I can decide on my own whether an environment is safe for leaving my screen unlocked or not.

    Normally I wouldn't worry about something like this, but this is Microsoft we are talking about. They think they know my situation so much better than I do, they need to make this choice for me.

  56. Or even worst by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Why was he fired when it seems VERY obvious he did not do it.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  57. Couldn't have put it better myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Goodbye

  58. Re:Congratulations,your PC is now a governance dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "given the kind of governance we're about to enter into"

    LOL. Given your stupidity and gullibility, how do you manage to tie your own shoelaces? You believe everything the Jew owned media has told you about Trump being 'bad', and therefore Hillary would be 'better', even though she was (and is) much further involved with the unelected 'elite' who have enslaved us all.
    Oh wait, you don't think you're enslaved? Try setting up an all white country, or even a city, or a village, or even a STREET - you will be imprisoned. How have we reached this level of insanity? Every white country on Earth has open borders with millions of unwanted non-whites pouring in, destroying our way of life and our countries, and you doubtless believe I'm a 'bad' person for merely wanting to live around people who don't want to ruin my life, and who aren't useless parasites. How 'bad' of me.

    MOST Americans supported Trump. Have you never bothered to look at the size of the crowds at Trump rallies versus at Clinton's rallies? Yet you believe the '50/50' bullshit from the Jew media, when your own EYES show you Trump has much more support than Hillary?

  59. Linux by stooo · · Score: 1

    Frankly, this is really old news.
    I Use "Windows Goodbye" daily since 2008.
    It's called Linux.

    You just have to check the right option :
    "Erase disk and install linux mint"
    https://learnlinuxandlibreoffi...

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was thinking the same thing when reading the title :
      Bluetooth and linux... old...
      Function :
            leave desk : locks ,
            return to desk : unlocks...
      would be better with passive nfc though...
      (also works with debian, freebsd and other linux/bsds, provided that the bt support works )

  60. cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause those 2 companies are stooooopid as worms

  61. Error in summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No corporation on Earth teaches employees to use Win+L, if you were to try and tell 99% of the workforce to use the "Win" key they wouldn't know what the Hell you were talking about and get mad at you for making them look stupid. Instead, it is ingrained into everybody's head to use Ctrl+Alt+Del then Enter as that is something everyone has grown up with and what the Windows 10 Start screen shows the user to do to unlock the computer (on machines upgraded from Windows 7 or with the feature enabled on clean installs).

  62. Re:Congratulations,your PC is now a governance dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a monitor with a setting to dim automatically if it detects I'm not there. Of course, just like a crappy bathroom faucet sensor, almost anything can throw it off, including wearing a black shirt.

  63. Easier to do with Bluetooth by kruhft · · Score: 1

    I once did a linux prototype like this that would lock and unlock your computer based on phone proximity using bluetooth. Worked like a charm. No camera required.

  64. Re:Congratulations,your PC is now a governance dev by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Well, you can be a cowardly cuck and accept Miscreant-o-soft's phallus into your backside all you want, meanwhile the rest of us will continue to fight for what's right and what's ours. I hope for your sake you enjoy being a 'power bottom'.

  65. Soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSW9000: "I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that"