Slashdot Mirror


Apple Planning To Make Original TV Shows and Movies as Hardware Sales Soften (venturebeat.com)

While investors seem to remain optimistic about the future of Apple, it's no secret that sales of its iconic hardware products have flatlined or fallen over the past year. From a report: We'll have to wait until January 31 to find out how the company performed over the critical holiday period. But for the moment, its most promising category of revenue has been "services," which includes things like Apple Music, and has been on a big winning streak over the past several quarters. Now it appears Apple is getting ready to make an even bigger bet in that category. According to a story just published by the Wall Street Journal, the company "has been in talks with veteran producers in recent months about buying rights to scripted television programs. It also has approached experienced marketing executives at studios and networks to discuss hiring them to promote its content." According to the story, the programming would be part of is Apple Music subscription ($6/month for an individual plan, $9 for a family plan.) The movie bit is deemed to be "more preliminary," according to the Journal.

130 comments

  1. Sigh... slashdot editor fail again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Prices quoted in the summary are wrong. It's 9.99 for single user 14.99 for family. Either that or the currency symbol needs to be changed.

    1. Re: Sigh... slashdot editor fail again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appflix?

  2. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by The-Ixian · · Score: 0

    But that's what people want these days. I am absolutely sure it will be a huge success for Apple. (not being sarcastic)

    --
    My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  3. An Apple a day keeps Paradise away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Apple Planning To Make Original TV Shows and Movies

    They will release the most Apple story ever:

    Cast: one man (nude), one women (nude), two angels with blazing swords, one bearded elder on sacred throne
    Supporting roles: one snake, two apple trees, a son active in agriculture, another son who prefers animal husbandry
    Script: licensed by people who call themselves chosen

    1. Re:An Apple a day keeps Paradise away! by dehachel12 · · Score: 1

      >one man (nude), one women (nude)
      And a shower ?

    2. Re:An Apple a day keeps Paradise away! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      It'll be golden, I tell ya. Absolutely Yuge.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. This is insane behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of making their core products better, Apple decides to spend time and money on stuff that most likely will
    be a waste of time and money and will bring NO benefit to the world.

    Somebody, please tell me why Tim Cook is worthy of being the CEO of Apple, because from where I sit it looks like
    he is leading the company into the abyss.

    ( maybe Tim Cook and Marissa Mayer can compare notes when it's all over )

    1. Re:This is insane behavior. by avandesande · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:This is insane behavior. by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      Um.... because they are Apple? They can do no wrong? People will line up around the corner to watch the new TV shows even though there is no point to line up around the corner...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:This is insane behavior. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      People will pay more for Apple stuff even though it costs the same to make as cheaper entertainment.

      It will be interesting to see what they come up with. Most premium offerings like Netflix originals and HBO rely on being able to go further than free-to-air channels in terms of violence, sex and other adult themes. Apple has a kind of wholesome image, with Jobs famously saying that onanists should choose Android.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:This is insane behavior. by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tim Cook is one hell of a COO, the guy knows how to get hardware made. The problem is he's not a product CEO like SJ was. I feel Tim should move back to COO and bring in a product guy like Tony Fadell or Scott Forstall to run the show. The recent defections are likely a sign that things aren't good internally at Apple.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    5. Re:This is insane behavior. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Instead of making their core products better, Apple decides to spend time and money on stuff that most likely will be a waste of time and money and will bring NO benefit to the world.

      Perhaps you should ask a Kardashian about the value of bringing mindless entertainment to the masses before attempting to label that activity as a waste of time and money.

      Somebody, please tell me why Tim Cook is worthy of being the CEO of Apple, because from where I sit it looks like he is leading the company into the abyss.

      Don't hold your breath. Given their cash reserves and corporate holdings, the proverbial abyss of bankruptcy is only about 200 years away...or never, considering they clearly qualify for the Too-Big-To-Fail bailout program.

      ( maybe Tim Cook and Marissa Mayer can compare notes when it's all over )

      (Neither of them will give a shit after floating away on a diamond-encrusted platinum lined corporate parachute to live on a private island somewhere.)

    6. Re:This is insane behavior. by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      They don't have to be "better". Apple hardware tends to be one-at-a-time kit - there aren't *that* many people who will own and use multiple laptops or smartphones at the same time. However, it's entirely practical (and common) for a Netflix subscriber to also purchase a season of a TV series from the iTunes Store. Apple focusing a bit more on services allows them to widen their potential customer base by creating a product whose competitors can all coexist, which isn't nearly as easy for laptops and smartphones. Therefore, they don't need to out-Netflix Netflix, they just have to have a TV show that a million people are willing to spend $20/season on, irrespective if those people are also Netflix subscribers.

    7. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      core products

      I see what you did there.

    8. Re:This is insane behavior. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      Ever wonder if they said the exact same thing to Netflix a few years ago?

      The world is flattening, which is opening up markets companies never even dreamed of before, so perhaps we can stop with this whole "over-saturated" theory now. Sure seems to me damn near anyone can make a buck these days as long as you can avoid infringing on someone else's patents, trademarks, or copyrights. Original content is a rather common-sense approach to doing exactly that.

    9. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      entertainment market being completely over-saturated.

      I know what the dot-com crashes look like. Have we ever had such a large entertainment bubble? It gave us cheap Netflix for a while, but what's it going to look like when it all comes crashing down?

    10. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      He's doing what CEOs are "supposed to do" (short term profit) instead of what puts a company in line for long term innovation and success. Apple is going back to what it was when Jobs left the first time.

    11. Re:This is insane behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to find a necromancer to raise Steve Jobs (his first order of business: sue the makers of the TV show iZombie).

      Short of that, maybe frequent séances would help.

    12. Re:This is insane behavior. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Just watch keynotes where Scott Forstall takes the stage. If he's not Steve Jobs 2.0, I don't know who is.

    13. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      they just have to have a TV show that a million people are willing to spend $20/season on

      $20 million? That's a cheap show by Netflix's standards.. "The Get Down" cost almost $200 million for a season.

    14. Re:This is insane behavior. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      At first I thought it was stupid, but you're right... they already have iTunes, so this is probably going to end up more akin to Amazon Prime Video than Netflix (although I admit the difference is subtle in some ways)

    15. Re:This is insane behavior. by hey! · · Score: 1

      What makes you think doing better than existing studios is the goal? I think the goal is to find some way to extract more revenue out of their iTunes customers. The result doesn't have to be artistically better than what's out there (although that is one strategy). It doesn't have to be financially more successful on its own than Netflix or Hulu. It just has to turn a new profit.

      There are basically three ways to grow profits. (1) Get in on the ground in a new and growing market; (2) become more efficient; (3) become larger and more complex. Figuring out the next big thing is tricky. Becoming more efficient is hard. Becoming larger and more complex doesn't benefit stockholders all that much, but it's an easy way to make your senior managers richer.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:This is insane behavior. by avandesande · · Score: 0

      Don't even compare the two. HBO can make 'halo' offerings like GOT because they have decades of experience doing it. If you throw money at the problem you end up with barely watchable second-tier stuff like netflix which is the best apple can hope to do.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    17. Re:This is insane behavior. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      What makes Netflix think they can do better than the existing studios?
      What makes Amazon Studios think they can do better than the existing studios?

      The old media companies let their guard down. If Apple started producing content that the old Discovery or TLC channel would have made they should do fine.

    18. Re:This is insane behavior. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      They don't need to do better. They will just block other media from playing on their devices!

    19. Re:This is insane behavior. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Netflix's own stuff is great, especially their Marvell shows.

      On the other hand, Amazon's is really hit and miss, mostly miss. That proves that money alone isn't enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:This is insane behavior. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      If they are good or not is certainly a matter of opinion, but these shows certainly don't generate the buzz that GOT did.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    21. Re: This is insane behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you don't like it, it will be because you are watching it wrong.

    22. Re: This is insane behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took Jobs three failures (Apple first time with it barely surviving, Pixar which was only saved by Toy Story, and NeXT) to finally get it right, so it might be worth cutting Cook some slack.

    23. Re:This is insane behavior. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated.

      [citation needed]

      What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      They don't have to. They only have to do approximately as well.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:This is insane behavior. by Falos · · Score: 1

      I would concede that as dumb-but-true more a year ago than today. Being an old loyalist in a crisis of faith seems downright fashionable lately.

    25. Re:This is insane behavior. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Tim Cook is one hell of a COO, the guy knows how to get hardware made. The problem is he's not a product CEO like SJ was.

      Great, so he can get hardware made, but it's the wrong hardware. Apple can't sink fast enough for me, so I welcome this fact, but it seems inconvenient for Apple.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:This is insane behavior. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Since when does Apple have to make something that brings a benefit to the world? Do you want them to start making medical equipment now?

      However, under Tim Cook Apple has brought out the last of Steve Jobs ideas and now they are pretty much aimless. They move from one bright and shiny new idea onto the next one while ignoring the products that brought them success in the first place. Apple has completely lost their focus on building applications that are easy to use. Just compare how the Music application on iOS use to be and what it is. Before (iOS 7 or 8) when playing a song you could change the volume and set the rating on the screen. Now you have to pull up another screen to change the volume and put the new screen away to change songs. And you can't change the rating (stars) for a song anymore, just whether or not you like it with the heart. I have a number of smart playlists that use the rating for sorting new podcasts so I can't use my iPhone anymore as I am unable to set the rating. I used to listing to a number of podcasts while away from home and set the rating for what I wanted to do with it later on (delete, keep, look into buying the bands music, etc). Now I don't listen to podcasts that have music because of that change. Ever since buying Beats things really started to go downhill.

      I'm no fan of Tim Cook as CEO and wish he was replaced. Apple needs someone with vision and the wisdom to remain true to their principles back in charge.

    27. Re:This is insane behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix has done it be eschewing the conventional wisdom of broadcast television. They're acting more like cable network (higher quality shows). It also tends to launch a bunch of episodes at once for the sake of binge watchers (since if someone likes a show, they want to watch it all at once).

      Stranger things is a fantastic miniseries that probably wouldn't get made anywhere else in this day and age, even cable seems more oriented to multi-season series.

      Fuller House exploits nostalgia for Full House.

      Gilmore Girls continues from that series (people who liked the show seem to say it's good).

    28. Re:This is insane behavior. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      Odd, that's what they said about every market (and every producer in it) Apple has entered.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  5. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Each show will feature bearded hipsters from San Francisco, dialog about organic food, and indie music from pitchfork.

  6. So what shows will Apple make. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    An apple movie? How about a remake of:

    I, Robot? I, Frankenstein? I know what you did last summer? I married an axe murderer?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who marked this troll? This is funny. Somebody lacks a sense of humor.

    2. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by Flafferay · · Score: 1

      Slow Clap.

    3. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Something tells me if they remake "I, Robot", they get sued by iRobot, and then Apple countersues for them using the lowercase "i" in front of their brand name - only to be told that iRobot has had a lowercase "i" for much longer. Make a series out of that whole legal farce, and I'd watch it.

    4. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our Best. Movie. Yet.

    5. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      iSee what you did there.

      Sadly, "So I Married an Axe Murderer" doesn't qualify, even though of the things you list that's the movie iLiked best.

  7. Apple, why don't you show some "courage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and do better with your hardware.

    1. Re:Apple, why don't you show some "courage" by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like my 2012 15" Macbook Pro. Love it. But I haven't seen anything they've produced since that is worth buying. It's been a drive to lighten and reduce size and no other real improvements. They need to realize that some people don't want a 3mm thick computer at the cost of it becoming disposable in 3 years. Leave the option to change the battery and upgrade memory at the least. I'm going to be looking for a new laptop in another 3 or 4 years and it isn't looking like another Mac.

    2. Re:Apple, why don't you show some "courage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really seems like apple has given up on power users, I haven't been to apple hq in awhile but I'm betting that touch typing (where you don't have to look at the keyboard) is all be dead.

      It also looks like the guy who was in charge of magnets retired or quit. Magsafe is gone, the older iMacs used to have the screen attached with magnets, my ipad uses a magnet to turn on and off (I assume that those still work).

      The writing has been on the wall for awhile, it's just been subtle. Someone who doesn't use computers for a living has slowly trying to merge the phone/tablet functionality into the Mac line and it's failing.

      The latest observation is how the size of the trackpad is on the new MBP, Using a friends MBP I find that my palms now invade the trackpad. All this because they are afraid to do a touchscreen (which I don't really want).

      So I'm now slowing migrating to other solutions, FireTV to replace my old appleTV, looking for a decent 32G laptop and my next phone will be Android with a freaking headphone port.

      It was fun while it lasted but microsoft will win this war the way it's going.

  8. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, it'll sell like hotcakes, obviously. No doubt about it.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  9. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    It will be the most offensively inoffensive show ever produced.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  10. Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "While investors seem to remain optimistic about the future of Apple, it's no secret that sales of its iconic hardware products have flatlined or fallen over the past year..."

    I see that the kitsch of paying 3x more for fashionable hardware tends to succumb to the same thing last years clothing line falls victim to; becoming outdated and unpopular.

    1. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      becoming outdated and unpopular.

      Isn't that what Apple has always wanted? Now update to the new phone - your old one's obsolete.

    2. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Apple charges a premium price but 3x is bullshit.

    3. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      flatlined or fallen over the past year..."

      A company has finally made a Mini sided competitor, the NUC.
      The Pro line is probably one of the last things Jobs had a hand in making. It just passed 3 years old.
      They dropped their 17" line.
      The 15" line was neutered.

      Perhaps they should concentrate on making *hardware* if they want to sell it.

    4. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to Slashdot. Nerds who use hyperbole and think they are clever.

    5. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It used to painful but worth it. Now it's just painful.

      Pay a bit over the odds for fantastic and lovely machines has become pay through the nose for average machines that look nice.

    6. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by geekmux · · Score: 0

      Apple charges a premium price but 3x is bullshit.

      I'm running a 7-year old laptop because I've upgraded key components along the way to maximize useful life. Did the same thing with my 2012 Mac Mini.

      Apple has now chosen to seal the case shut, limit the RAM, and solder every component to the chassis, including the hard drive. The price can easily become 3x when you consider your "premium" investment turns into a fucking paperweight when the wrong component fails, forcing you to go shopping again prematurely.

      The only thing that is bullshit here is Apples unending amount of "courage".

    7. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >A company has finally made a Mini sided competitor, the NUC.

      There were already competitors out there, though not quite as small.

      Dell used to sell slim desktops with desktop Pentium CPUs. They cost $230 ($200 on a sale). A desktop Pentium probably performed similar to a mobile i5.

      Dell stopped selling them and replaced them with Chromebox-style Windows machines. It's unfortunately, since they could at least take slim PCIe cards and had a line-in jack. It would make a decent media computer.

  11. Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will the content be totally about promoting so-called "Social Justice" philosophies and ideals?

    We've seen a lot of content like that being produced lately. We've seen long-established characters changed to a different race or gender or sexual preference or some other trait just to make the content more "inclusive", even if it makes no sense within story lines or established canon. Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it, and the rest of the character pretty much ignored.

    Now is probably the wrong time to be dealing with such content. The American public, at least, is getting sick and tired of having this sort of crap forced on them at every opportunity by the media. Even in Europe, which has long been a stronghold of "Social Justice" philosophy, is getting very tired of all of it after dealing with the illegal aliens who have forced their way into those nations, only to commit crimes and terrorist attacks.

    I can't see how there would be a solid future to this, especially from a financial standpoint, if they're force-feeding leftist ideology to an ever-shrinking portion of the populace. America is swinging to the right. The UK is swinging to the right. Europe is swinging to the right. Australia is swinging to the right. The majority of the citizens of the major markets that would pay for and consume "Social Justice" content are all moving away from those leftist ideologies. I don't see how giving them content they don't want and won't buy will succeed.

    If this content avoids the "Social Justice" narrative, and perhaps even questions it and tears it apart, then it may have a chance for success. Otherwise, I can't see it being a success.

    1. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      An coherent post with a reasonable, logical argument??

      You do realize you posted this on /. right?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Falos · · Score: 1

      >Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it
      Solely so you make an hour of headlines with "X IS NOW Y".
      *(in this one particular episode or arc of the paper/book/TV/movie edition of Z)

      Then, surprise surprise, the moment of fame recedes to the same level of notoriety the series, character, artist, writer, etc. had previously.

      I call it the PC Pump'n'dump.

    3. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Now is probably the wrong time to be dealing with such content. The American public, at least, is getting sick and tired of having this sort of crap forced on them at every opportunity by the media.

      [citation needed]

      Even if you're right, only the portion of the American public which has money and responds to advertising is relevant. That's who mass media is for.

      I can't see how there would be a solid future to this, especially from a financial standpoint, if they're force-feeding leftist ideology to an ever-shrinking portion of the populace. America is swinging to the right.

      [citation needed]

      America is not swinging to the right. America is generally conservative, if you measure by land area. We liberals have scored no significant victories in ages. Did you forget that Obamacare is actually Romneycare, a handout to insurance companies which actually compromises health care access for working Americans to benefit the rich while placating the poor with inadequate health care? Did you think that the people who voted for Trump fell off the turnip truck last night? If that were true, they wouldn't be old enough to vote yet.

      On the other hand, the American populace is liberal. We're just concentrated in a few locations to which we have been hounded by the right-wing fascists.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      We've seen a lot of content like that being produced lately. We've seen long-established characters changed to a different race or gender or sexual preference or some other trait just to make the content more "inclusive", even if it makes no sense within story lines or established canon. Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it, and the rest of the character pretty much ignored.

      They did that with Star Wars in a pretty bad way. They took away the canon of the Storm Troopers all being clones of one another just so they could make the leader be a female and the protagonist be black, and then they made a female Jedi. I could understand the later because I don't recall there being anything about Jedi only being male (they can even be midget green aliens with pointy ears) but the Storm Troopers just makes no fucking sense, especially if the first order is trying to be ruthlessly efficient (why have regular people be Storm Troopers when they can just pick a solid performer and clone him multiple times?)

      Though admittedly I'm not a big Star Wars fan to begin with, so my understanding of the lore could be off.

  12. I love Portlandia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh wait, it's in San Francisco.

  13. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be fooled by misleading info based on investor's expectations. A company with hundreds of billions in cash, and sales in the the tens of billions per quarter is as strong as ever. Obviously, investors want to see "growth", as in "growth in return on investment". If sales are flat they will go elsewhere, which is fine: Apple will still sell billions worth of hardware every year, people will still buy them, employees will get paid, tax will be owed. Imagine a company that has flat sales of 30B per year. Nott too shabby, yet investors will cry agonize over why this company id doomed. Come to your sense, get a life, and move on.

    1. Re:Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Infinite growth" is the worst fallacy ever.

  14. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politically correct speech, lotsa Apple products in the background, and subtle propaganda supporting Tim Cook's political belief's.

    I'm sure this is exactly what Steve Jobs had in mind before passing... He must be turning over in his grave at what Tim's done to his legacy.

    Not that I'm typical, but I recently purchased my first Windows machine in 10 years. Apple has dumbed their devices and OS down too much for me. Add to this their increasing prices and lack of direction, and I think we're headed back towards Mac clones before too long.

    Ah... The glory days of Apple. Remember when they used to be relevant?

  15. *facepalm* by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tim Cook: Oh no! Hardware sales are falling! What can we do?
    exec: Stop making stupid hardware and go back to making stuff people actually want?
    Tim Cook: No no that can't be it. We've just saturated the market so we need to start doing something else.

    1. Re:*facepalm* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Cook: Oh no! Hardware sales are falling because china's economy is in a recession! What can we do?
      exec: Wait it out.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:*facepalm* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tim Cook: Oh no! Hardware sales are falling! What can we do?
      exec: Stop catering to African-Americans.
      Tim Cook: Well then, I think I might just be able to take an early retirement.

    3. Re:*facepalm* by sootman · · Score: 1

      Tim Cook, 2014: Hardware sales are going well, but OBVIOUSLY they won't continue to climb FOREVER. We should think of some other things so we can keep making money once THE INEVITABLE happens. Maybe we can get into content. People will ALWAYS need content. And it takes time. You can't just build a substantial amount overnight. We'd better start thinking about this now.
      The Market, 2016: Hardware sales slump.
      The Internet, 2017: Shits itself writing about how Apple is doomed.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    4. Re: *facepalm* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what jumped out at me. So many commenters talking about how Apple is "focusing on the wrong thing", but who could possibly believe this content concept was only made based off of recent lack of growth in hardware sales? Apple does not simply suddenly talk about plans they brainstormed a month prior.

  16. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Ah... The glory days of Apple. Remember when they used to be relevant?

    Remember the glory days of Microsoft? Those are over too. Once upon a time, they asked "Where do you want to go today?" Now, they just say "We know where you've been and what you're doing right now."

  17. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    The cake is a lie.

  18. Thin actors only and no unions! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Thin actors only and no unions!

  19. Fine, open up MacOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If Apple wants to be a services and software oriented company and move away from making hardware, fine... but please, for all that is good, open up support for MacOS onto standard PC hardware so us Mac users can get on with life without struggling with under powered and antiquated hardware for no good reason.

    Also, while you are at it, please work out whatever issues you have with Nvidia and help them release their pascal drivers on MacOS...

    Thank you,

    A concerned long time customer that is very much not alone.

    1. Re:Fine, open up MacOS by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Apple has no future as anything other than a hardware company. The software side was simply to provide support for the hardware. To think they'll somehow transition into the over saturated dog eat dog world of the entertainment industry is crazy. The iPod allowed them to leverage the music business for iTunes but it's not where their money is.

  20. Where does this lead? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    So... everyone is making their own original content. What I've seen from Amazon and Netflix is often quite good. Will it end up like TV where they will syndicate each other's old seasons or do they hold out so you'll subscribe for a few months to each of them to rotate through binging their series in turn? I subscribe to Netflix because I find enough to watch, we have Prime Video as a value-add to Amazon Prime... we'll sign back up for HBO Now to watch GoT and plan to binge Westworld in between episodes of GoT. It seems like there'll be some conglomeration of some kind as the competition gets more entrenched.

    1. Re:Where does this lead? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That's what I wonder about the others. If Apple, and later Microsoft (they're likely to follow) start producing media content, then media companies might wanna consider getting into hardware of their own. Companies like Echostar, Charter, Comcast (ugh) et al should look into making their own branded computers. There is plenty of hardware, and plenty of software (Linux and BSD based) to choose from.

      I'd like to see more competition in hardware, not just in shows that I don't watch

  21. It sounds really tempting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really want to subscribe to original programming aimed at insufferable douchebags. Oh wait, no I don't.

  22. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Agreed. TV for fanboys and snowflakes.

    "Puffy the Android Slayer"
    "Game of Scones -A Starbuck's Saga"
    "I, Phone" - Humans and robot phones live in a future dystopia
    "Family Guys" - A story of a transgender fluid girl and her eleven dads and 2 1/2 mothers.

  23. Fire Tim Cook now by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    Calling Cook the Ballmer of Apple is an insult to Ballmer because at least Ballmer consistently raised revenues and profits and demonstrated a deep commitment to Microsoft's core markets. The fact is that putting Steve Ballmer in charge of Apple now would make more sense than keeping Cook. Ballmer would probably have a better shot of resurrecting the Mac's nose-diving reputation than Cook at this point.

    1. Re:Fire Tim Cook now by avandesande · · Score: 1

      At least MS didn't have the hubris to believe they can do anything on a whim. When they got into video games, they bought a successful studio and let them run semi-autonomously.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Fire Tim Cook now by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Calling Cook the Ballmer of Apple is an insult to Ballmer because at least Ballmer consistently raised revenues and profits and demonstrated a deep commitment to Microsoft's core markets. The fact is that putting Steve Ballmer in charge of Apple now would make more sense than keeping Cook. Ballmer would probably have a better shot of resurrecting the Mac's nose-diving reputation than Cook at this point.

      Let's ignore that especially in the later years of Balmer, Microsoft's revenue and profits was very volatile.

      You can only make the claim about Cook's performance because he introduced the iPhone 6 (Plus) at the end of 2014, and because that product was so outstandingly successful that 2015 was a black swan year for Apple. If Apple had sold 22 million less iPhone 6 (Plus), there would be a nice steady growth for both 2015 and 2016.

      IOW claim that Cook wasn't successful hinges on the fact that he was extremely successful in one year. And that's just plain nuts.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  24. Probably an attempt to manipulate the stock price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll believe Apple are committed to light entertainment when either money changes hands or actual shows start appearing.

    Until then, this looks like another attempt to manipulate the stock price.

  25. I think they should open up OSX for all/many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X86, allow installs on non apple hardware.

  26. AppleTV TV by Krakadoom · · Score: 1

    Among the sizzling innovations in the new Apple programming will be that you can no longer turn off your TV or stop playback once you've started an episode, it will automatically perform "updates" of your platform to prevent non-Apple content being played back in the future, and you will need to sign over your firstborn and put your house up as collateral to create a streaming account in the first place.

  27. Saturation by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what everyone said when Netflix started making shows? Turned out OK for them.

    There is a lot of content out there. A lot of it is garbage. A lot of shows are canned because they aren't popular *enough* for a particular demographic. Or because a network head doesn't like a producer, or production company, or director.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Saturation by avandesande · · Score: 1

      If they somehow cannibalize 100% of netflix's business that's a whole 400 million in profits

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Saturation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think at some point someone's going to complain about Apple's market position and attempt to break them up. They've got hardware, operating systems, a distribution service, and now content production.

      It's already a mess with our ISPs that own both content creation and distribution.

  28. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, Apple is in California, it will be shows about how cool SF-bay area is instead of say LA or NYC.

    If tech companies want to fund TV shows, they are welcome to do so, but I dare say that we need less "bland" and more cutting edge. If Apple wants to get ahead, they should be funding the next Star Trek, banning reality shows, and producing cartoons, as that is in their wheelhouse (remember who had Pixar?)

    That said, the kind of content that Netflix and Amazon have produced has been kinda.... eh.

    The Man in the High Castle (Amazon) was pretty good for what it was, but you'd never get even HBO to fund something like that, because it's so full of intentionally racist/anti-semite language. And half of it takes place in Japanese-Occupied San Francisco (the other half in a Nazi-occupied NYC that you wouldn't recognize.)

    A lot of the TV shows that Netflix has been producing (eg The 100) have also been pretty violent, but that is what it is (a show that is basically Lord of the Flies with the setting of post-nuclear holocaust North America)

    Neither of these shows would ever have seen the light of day if they were produced by NBC/CBS/etc because those networks have to be essentially kid friendly at all times. HBO probably could have produced The 100, but I'm absolutely sure the Man in the High Castle would be too risky for even them.

    Apple, I'd suspect would want to produce only films that are stylish/tech-savvy since they could put their own products in it. That is something that Amazon and Netflix can't do (although I've seen a fair bit of "product placement" of Amazon boxes in various anime, I wouldn't put it past Amazon actually licencing anime like Netflix has.) Japanese anime is also fond of Apple devices, though typically the logos are changed into things that aren't really Apple iconography.

  29. Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of shows and movies about how awesome Apple is...

  30. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to figure out what market Apple is targeting. It sure isn't the 14 to 24 group.

  31. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Presumably they'll patent the whole concept and put netflix out of business.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  32. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Mmm, windows 10 spying, the second most original joke floating around just behind oooooo samsung phones explode all the time.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  33. Too late by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    They already made Queer as Folk.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Too late by cute-boy · · Score: 1

      Your point is...?

  34. Series Idea by romanr · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could do a series ala Seinfeld, but the characters could spend every show looking for their mis-placed wireless AirPods.

  35. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first episode features a walk-on part about this guy who rediscovers vinyl music recordings and that crates of em were being sold or as a curb alert. If that walk-on didn't star Christopher Walken in a speaking role then the series is DOA

  36. A show about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    young and beautiful people going to national parks and taking pictures for the Photo's app. even the old people will be young and beautiful. and diverse of course.

    no fat people though.

  37. Economics and ego, not social justice by swb · · Score: 2

    Netflix recently remade "One Day at a Time" with a Latino family.

    For Hollywood, reselling the same crap in a new box has always been a ticket to profit, or at least less loss. And the egos in Hollywood like to believe that their shows somehow contain a kernel of universal truth.

    So I'm pretty sure the thinking is along the lines of "there's a whole bunch of Latinos who probably never saw One Day at a Time. If we remake it with a Latino cast, we can recycle 9 years of scripts for the cost of writing 2 years of an original program, and ODaaT was successful because of its timeless and placeless insights into the human condition, so of course Latinos will lap it up with a Latino cast. We'll make millions."

    It's really no different than the recycling of Japanese horror movies into American horror movies, or, really, these modern versions of Shakespeare plays that get turned out once in a while, or even "The Office".

  38. how many extra dongles? by Idisagree · · Score: 1

    & how much courage will be needed for this?

  39. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think many people here are interested in indonesian-translated japanimation?

  40. It's all about Jan 31 by trevc · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately these days it is just the next earnings statement that matters. 3 months at a time is all the planning that's needed.

  41. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. The joke is on you.

  42. Fonzi scheme by Trilobyte · · Score: 1

    Wow, Apple has jumped the shark before even producing their first episode.

    Maybe declining revenue from hardware sales could instead be addressed by a return to offering compelling and valuable hardware choices for the consumer to purchase.

    (/me waits for news that Apple's new content was produced using tools from Adobe or Avid)

  43. It is a problem I've talked about for a long time by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 0

    And one that often gets me downvoted since Mac users don't like to hear it: Apple is a fashion company. That's why they've been able to do what they do. In fashion, a higher price can be a GOOD thing not a bad thing, whereas consumer electronics are one of the most notoriously price sensitive markets out there.

    However the downside is as you say: What is fashionable changes and it is really hard to stay on top of it forever.

  44. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be pedantic, The 100 was actually created by a "kid friendly" network - The CW - if you can call it that (though its programming is more targeted to teens and adolescents) and Netflix is only licensing it for distribution. So to say only Netflix is producing shows of this kind is wrong. Hell if you watch Arrow you'll see some pretty decent violence as that's just how straightforward the character is

  45. Editorializing by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    That "as hardware sales soften" is pure editorializing. The author is linking this initiative with hardware sales for his own reasons.

  46. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People with money.

  47. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by mallyn · · Score: 1
    You forgot. San Francisco is the gayest city in the country (if not the planet). So, this has to have a gay theme as well. There is lots of material to draw from. You can do many episodes on Harvey Milk alone. And that is not even touching what the AIDS crisis has done. Take the move We Were There. That would fit in nice with this offering.

    For music, we don't have to go further than the San Francisco Gay Mens Chorus and their long history with the city.

    If Apple can play their cards right and plan accordingly, this can be a wonderful asset (and beacon) for the worldwide GLBTQ community.

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  48. And this time next year by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    We get to hear all about how piracy is killing Apple, Beeeeeeelions in lost profits, the company is tanking on account of all of these freeloaders watching our content for freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

    We need a host of new laws on the books to protect us all from these criminal consumers!
     

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  49. Port XCode by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1
    Seriously, end the tyrrany and oppression of having XCode bundled with OSX. I want to stop buying Apple Products all together because the new Macbook Pro is a piece of shit and I'm not sure their fucked up AirBuds will fit my ears - but need to still have the ability to create iOS Apps without having to use VNC

    Frankly, Apple is fucked -- Tim Cook was a good lackey for Jobs, but has not sense of purpose or direction The smart move would have been for him to find a younger, brilliant, "jobs-like" replacement that he could have mentored Instead, Cook tried to be Jobs and has in a few short years lost momentum and marketability across all of Apple's products Within a few more years, Apple will be back to downsizing and begging for money to live

  50. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But how does this happen in practice? Same movie is released every year with shinier title graphics and new episode number?

  51. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the documentary about a young visionary from Dubai who started a computer company named after Figs: Steve

  52. Result by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    You: "I don't like this TV show from the Apple network."

    S. Jobs: "You're watching it wrong!"

  53. Dear Apple by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Dear Apple,

    How about making products your customers actually want? Like a MacBook Pro that's actually a pro-level computer. Or, a "Cheesegrater" Mac Pro with Thunderbolt and USB 3/3.1?

    See, here's the deal: no one wanted the trash-can Mac Pro. We wanted the existing model with the I/O capabilities you put in your home-user machines. But, it's too late. You've lost us. We're tired of paying premium prices for last-years already outdated technology.

    And you guys are really missing the bus with your lack of VR-compatible hardware. Sure, VR might be a flash in the pan, but isn't the fact that you make NOTHING with the CPU/GPU power to support it worrying?

    Yours,
    RatBastard, a former Mac customer.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Dear Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% this. Even agree about VR (and AR). They have really dropped the ball in their hardware and that's pretty much what their company is built on. Now instead of listening to their long time customers, they are instead deciding to continue down the same path with their hardware and hedge their bets in an already saturated market? Do they expect they're going to outdo everyone else already in this game and make up for all the lost hardware sales? Wtf?

  54. What planet are you posting from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've seen long-established characters changed to a different race or gender or sexual preference or some other trait just to make the content more "inclusive"

    Hey, I liked Spock! And Leonard Nimoy was just weird-looking enough to remind you he was an alien.

    we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it, and the rest of the character pretty much ignored.

    Hey, if you don't like 1930s movies, then stop watching them. It's not my fault you get "triggered" whenever you see a black maid flanderized in a movie. The casting director needed someone to play "the help," and they chose a black woman. Get over it, or if you really can't stand the sight of that, then maybe movies aren't for you. At least there's a lot less of the thing you're complaining about happening these days, than in your great grandparents' days.

    The American public, at least, is getting sick and tired of having this sort of crap forced on them at every opportunity by the media.

    Nobody has anything forced on them. The left always mis-uses the word "force." Get over it, kid: you opted in to your entertainment. People who don't opt into that, are probably watching something else. I think you may be a closet SJW. If you weren't, you would have pressed the channel-up or channel-down button on your remove long ago. Own up to your guilty pleasure; you'll feel better. Come out. I'm not into what you're into, but like I always say, different strokes for different folks. (If you people on left would adopt that attitude, we'd get along a lot better.)

    America is swinging to the right.

    Apparently you missed our most recent election, where American voters chose a New-Dealer for president, and while whiners complain that the more conservative candidate won the popular vote, the New-Dealer understood the electoral game and won fair'n'square. He ran on tariffs and other things whereby the government is going to become a lot more involved in micro-managing the economy than it had been back in the (relatively) anarcho-capitalist free-market Obama days.

    The election showed that America was getting tired of, or more likely scared of, the right wing's "race to the bottom." So the voters went left and demanded more government intervention in life. (Personally, I still advocate what they call the "race to the bottom," because "bottom" totally misses that cheapness itself is a measure of increased productivity, and ultimately productivity is what makes an economy strong. Also, laissez-faire in the economy translates to laissez-faire in domestic policy too, so that's how you maximize civil rights.) But Trump says we're too productive, too free, and the left (using the amusing label "alt right," I guess because you can't get much more alternative to the right than this) ate that up and said "we can change!"

    The result: prepare to see a lot more of what you just complained about. The "help" will be a black woman again.

  55. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Each show will feature bearded hipsters from San Francisco, dialog about organic food, and indie music from pitchfork.

    Sounds better than most of the TV out there.

  56. A Google Production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing, Google will get in on making original network content.

    Shouldn't Apple be focusing on making the iPhone more robust or something?

  57. Me too! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I want to do what Amazon, Netflix and Hulu do!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're rigtht. It sounds like a move, MS would make.

  58. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Except Microsoft never stopped being relevant. Apple on the other hand is on the cusp of becoming irrelevant.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  59. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PF has been 70% hip hop, trap, and alt-r&b for a few years now. They've kind of fucked up the indie scene. Now most "indie" kids are into the same exact shit every other basic Kanye/Drake/Weeknd worshipping guy and girl is along with a few of the same most popular indie artists/bands.

  60. Re: Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese anime still uses old rectangular iconic 'keitai' designs. Apple featured more in early anime from the 90s, shows such as Serial Experiments Lain and Magical Girl Pretty Sammy where Sasami's brother uses a "pineapple" computer against Biff Standard's "Stanardsoft". Apple is dead last in current anime in terms of laptops and computers too.

  61. Great Movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you have to buy an adapter to hear the people speaking..

  62. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Each show will feature bearded hipsters from San Francisco, dialog about organic food, and indie music from pitchfork.

    Hunh? Google will make shows?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  63. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is the Disney of Computers. Take something already out there, preferably unencumbered by Patents(Copyrights), and repackage it.
    aka Reboots.

  64. Think different by akilone · · Score: 1

    So, the Apple slogan was think different, revolutionize and now is just to generate money. This and other few things indicates that inertia of SJ is slowly fading out. They do nothing in last 5 years apart from the chairmans sharing enormous salaries. It is really sad. SJ wanted to redo TV, education but they touch none of those. Now they want to make movies? Wtf. That is really inovative and revolutionary. It just show that they have no clue what they are doing with company. If iPhone 8 fails (be the same as three last iphone) I think that would be the final sign what future is going to be for Apple.

  65. I can see it now ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Timmy-kins running around the stage chanting "directors, directors, directors, directors."

    (for those of you who didn't get the reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMU0tzLwhbE)