Slashdot Mirror


Apple Planning To Make Original TV Shows and Movies as Hardware Sales Soften (venturebeat.com)

While investors seem to remain optimistic about the future of Apple, it's no secret that sales of its iconic hardware products have flatlined or fallen over the past year. From a report: We'll have to wait until January 31 to find out how the company performed over the critical holiday period. But for the moment, its most promising category of revenue has been "services," which includes things like Apple Music, and has been on a big winning streak over the past several quarters. Now it appears Apple is getting ready to make an even bigger bet in that category. According to a story just published by the Wall Street Journal, the company "has been in talks with veteran producers in recent months about buying rights to scripted television programs. It also has approached experienced marketing executives at studios and networks to discuss hiring them to promote its content." According to the story, the programming would be part of is Apple Music subscription ($6/month for an individual plan, $9 for a family plan.) The movie bit is deemed to be "more preliminary," according to the Journal.

79 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Sigh... slashdot editor fail again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Prices quoted in the summary are wrong. It's 9.99 for single user 14.99 for family. Either that or the currency symbol needs to be changed.

  2. This is insane behavior. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of making their core products better, Apple decides to spend time and money on stuff that most likely will
    be a waste of time and money and will bring NO benefit to the world.

    Somebody, please tell me why Tim Cook is worthy of being the CEO of Apple, because from where I sit it looks like
    he is leading the company into the abyss.

    ( maybe Tim Cook and Marissa Mayer can compare notes when it's all over )

    1. Re:This is insane behavior. by avandesande · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:This is insane behavior. by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      Um.... because they are Apple? They can do no wrong? People will line up around the corner to watch the new TV shows even though there is no point to line up around the corner...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:This is insane behavior. by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tim Cook is one hell of a COO, the guy knows how to get hardware made. The problem is he's not a product CEO like SJ was. I feel Tim should move back to COO and bring in a product guy like Tony Fadell or Scott Forstall to run the show. The recent defections are likely a sign that things aren't good internally at Apple.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    4. Re:This is insane behavior. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Instead of making their core products better, Apple decides to spend time and money on stuff that most likely will be a waste of time and money and will bring NO benefit to the world.

      Perhaps you should ask a Kardashian about the value of bringing mindless entertainment to the masses before attempting to label that activity as a waste of time and money.

      Somebody, please tell me why Tim Cook is worthy of being the CEO of Apple, because from where I sit it looks like he is leading the company into the abyss.

      Don't hold your breath. Given their cash reserves and corporate holdings, the proverbial abyss of bankruptcy is only about 200 years away...or never, considering they clearly qualify for the Too-Big-To-Fail bailout program.

      ( maybe Tim Cook and Marissa Mayer can compare notes when it's all over )

      (Neither of them will give a shit after floating away on a diamond-encrusted platinum lined corporate parachute to live on a private island somewhere.)

    5. Re:This is insane behavior. by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      They don't have to be "better". Apple hardware tends to be one-at-a-time kit - there aren't *that* many people who will own and use multiple laptops or smartphones at the same time. However, it's entirely practical (and common) for a Netflix subscriber to also purchase a season of a TV series from the iTunes Store. Apple focusing a bit more on services allows them to widen their potential customer base by creating a product whose competitors can all coexist, which isn't nearly as easy for laptops and smartphones. Therefore, they don't need to out-Netflix Netflix, they just have to have a TV show that a million people are willing to spend $20/season on, irrespective if those people are also Netflix subscribers.

    6. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      core products

      I see what you did there.

    7. Re:This is insane behavior. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      Ever wonder if they said the exact same thing to Netflix a few years ago?

      The world is flattening, which is opening up markets companies never even dreamed of before, so perhaps we can stop with this whole "over-saturated" theory now. Sure seems to me damn near anyone can make a buck these days as long as you can avoid infringing on someone else's patents, trademarks, or copyrights. Original content is a rather common-sense approach to doing exactly that.

    8. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      entertainment market being completely over-saturated.

      I know what the dot-com crashes look like. Have we ever had such a large entertainment bubble? It gave us cheap Netflix for a while, but what's it going to look like when it all comes crashing down?

    9. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      He's doing what CEOs are "supposed to do" (short term profit) instead of what puts a company in line for long term innovation and success. Apple is going back to what it was when Jobs left the first time.

    10. Re:This is insane behavior. by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Just watch keynotes where Scott Forstall takes the stage. If he's not Steve Jobs 2.0, I don't know who is.

    11. Re:This is insane behavior. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      they just have to have a TV show that a million people are willing to spend $20/season on

      $20 million? That's a cheap show by Netflix's standards.. "The Get Down" cost almost $200 million for a season.

    12. Re:This is insane behavior. by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      At first I thought it was stupid, but you're right... they already have iTunes, so this is probably going to end up more akin to Amazon Prime Video than Netflix (although I admit the difference is subtle in some ways)

    13. Re:This is insane behavior. by hey! · · Score: 1

      What makes you think doing better than existing studios is the goal? I think the goal is to find some way to extract more revenue out of their iTunes customers. The result doesn't have to be artistically better than what's out there (although that is one strategy). It doesn't have to be financially more successful on its own than Netflix or Hulu. It just has to turn a new profit.

      There are basically three ways to grow profits. (1) Get in on the ground in a new and growing market; (2) become more efficient; (3) become larger and more complex. Figuring out the next big thing is tricky. Becoming more efficient is hard. Becoming larger and more complex doesn't benefit stockholders all that much, but it's an easy way to make your senior managers richer.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:This is insane behavior. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      What makes Netflix think they can do better than the existing studios?
      What makes Amazon Studios think they can do better than the existing studios?

      The old media companies let their guard down. If Apple started producing content that the old Discovery or TLC channel would have made they should do fine.

    15. Re:This is insane behavior. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      They don't need to do better. They will just block other media from playing on their devices!

    16. Re:This is insane behavior. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Netflix's own stuff is great, especially their Marvell shows.

      On the other hand, Amazon's is really hit and miss, mostly miss. That proves that money alone isn't enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:This is insane behavior. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      If they are good or not is certainly a matter of opinion, but these shows certainly don't generate the buzz that GOT did.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    18. Re:This is insane behavior. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated.

      [citation needed]

      What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      They don't have to. They only have to do approximately as well.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:This is insane behavior. by Falos · · Score: 1

      I would concede that as dumb-but-true more a year ago than today. Being an old loyalist in a crisis of faith seems downright fashionable lately.

    20. Re:This is insane behavior. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Tim Cook is one hell of a COO, the guy knows how to get hardware made. The problem is he's not a product CEO like SJ was.

      Great, so he can get hardware made, but it's the wrong hardware. Apple can't sink fast enough for me, so I welcome this fact, but it seems inconvenient for Apple.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:This is insane behavior. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Since when does Apple have to make something that brings a benefit to the world? Do you want them to start making medical equipment now?

      However, under Tim Cook Apple has brought out the last of Steve Jobs ideas and now they are pretty much aimless. They move from one bright and shiny new idea onto the next one while ignoring the products that brought them success in the first place. Apple has completely lost their focus on building applications that are easy to use. Just compare how the Music application on iOS use to be and what it is. Before (iOS 7 or 8) when playing a song you could change the volume and set the rating on the screen. Now you have to pull up another screen to change the volume and put the new screen away to change songs. And you can't change the rating (stars) for a song anymore, just whether or not you like it with the heart. I have a number of smart playlists that use the rating for sorting new podcasts so I can't use my iPhone anymore as I am unable to set the rating. I used to listing to a number of podcasts while away from home and set the rating for what I wanted to do with it later on (delete, keep, look into buying the bands music, etc). Now I don't listen to podcasts that have music because of that change. Ever since buying Beats things really started to go downhill.

      I'm no fan of Tim Cook as CEO and wish he was replaced. Apple needs someone with vision and the wisdom to remain true to their principles back in charge.

    22. Re:This is insane behavior. by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Every indication points to the entertainment market being completely over-saturated. What makes Apple think they can do better than the existing studios?

      Odd, that's what they said about every market (and every producer in it) Apple has entered.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  3. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Each show will feature bearded hipsters from San Francisco, dialog about organic food, and indie music from pitchfork.

  4. So what shows will Apple make. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Funny

    An apple movie? How about a remake of:

    I, Robot? I, Frankenstein? I know what you did last summer? I married an axe murderer?

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by Flafferay · · Score: 1

      Slow Clap.

    2. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Something tells me if they remake "I, Robot", they get sued by iRobot, and then Apple countersues for them using the lowercase "i" in front of their brand name - only to be told that iRobot has had a lowercase "i" for much longer. Make a series out of that whole legal farce, and I'd watch it.

    3. Re:So what shows will Apple make. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      iSee what you did there.

      Sadly, "So I Married an Axe Murderer" doesn't qualify, even though of the things you list that's the movie iLiked best.

  5. Apple, why don't you show some "courage" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and do better with your hardware.

    1. Re:Apple, why don't you show some "courage" by amiga3D · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I like my 2012 15" Macbook Pro. Love it. But I haven't seen anything they've produced since that is worth buying. It's been a drive to lighten and reduce size and no other real improvements. They need to realize that some people don't want a 3mm thick computer at the cost of it becoming disposable in 3 years. Leave the option to change the battery and upgrade memory at the least. I'm going to be looking for a new laptop in another 3 or 4 years and it isn't looking like another Mac.

  6. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, it'll sell like hotcakes, obviously. No doubt about it.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  7. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    It will be the most offensively inoffensive show ever produced.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  8. Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "While investors seem to remain optimistic about the future of Apple, it's no secret that sales of its iconic hardware products have flatlined or fallen over the past year..."

    I see that the kitsch of paying 3x more for fashionable hardware tends to succumb to the same thing last years clothing line falls victim to; becoming outdated and unpopular.

    1. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      becoming outdated and unpopular.

      Isn't that what Apple has always wanted? Now update to the new phone - your old one's obsolete.

    2. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      Apple charges a premium price but 3x is bullshit.

    3. Re:Apple, your fashion statement is showing. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      flatlined or fallen over the past year..."

      A company has finally made a Mini sided competitor, the NUC.
      The Pro line is probably one of the last things Jobs had a hand in making. It just passed 3 years old.
      They dropped their 17" line.
      The 15" line was neutered.

      Perhaps they should concentrate on making *hardware* if they want to sell it.

  9. Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will the content be totally about promoting so-called "Social Justice" philosophies and ideals?

    We've seen a lot of content like that being produced lately. We've seen long-established characters changed to a different race or gender or sexual preference or some other trait just to make the content more "inclusive", even if it makes no sense within story lines or established canon. Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it, and the rest of the character pretty much ignored.

    Now is probably the wrong time to be dealing with such content. The American public, at least, is getting sick and tired of having this sort of crap forced on them at every opportunity by the media. Even in Europe, which has long been a stronghold of "Social Justice" philosophy, is getting very tired of all of it after dealing with the illegal aliens who have forced their way into those nations, only to commit crimes and terrorist attacks.

    I can't see how there would be a solid future to this, especially from a financial standpoint, if they're force-feeding leftist ideology to an ever-shrinking portion of the populace. America is swinging to the right. The UK is swinging to the right. Europe is swinging to the right. Australia is swinging to the right. The majority of the citizens of the major markets that would pay for and consume "Social Justice" content are all moving away from those leftist ideologies. I don't see how giving them content they don't want and won't buy will succeed.

    If this content avoids the "Social Justice" narrative, and perhaps even questions it and tears it apart, then it may have a chance for success. Otherwise, I can't see it being a success.

    1. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by Falos · · Score: 1

      >Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it
      Solely so you make an hour of headlines with "X IS NOW Y".
      *(in this one particular episode or arc of the paper/book/TV/movie edition of Z)

      Then, surprise surprise, the moment of fame recedes to the same level of notoriety the series, character, artist, writer, etc. had previously.

      I call it the PC Pump'n'dump.

    2. Re:Will it be "Social Justice" content? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      We've seen a lot of content like that being produced lately. We've seen long-established characters changed to a different race or gender or sexual preference or some other trait just to make the content more "inclusive", even if it makes no sense within story lines or established canon. Or we've seen new characters created with a trait like their gender, race, or sexual preference as their main defining characteristic, solely so focus can be put on it, and the rest of the character pretty much ignored.

      They did that with Star Wars in a pretty bad way. They took away the canon of the Storm Troopers all being clones of one another just so they could make the leader be a female and the protagonist be black, and then they made a female Jedi. I could understand the later because I don't recall there being anything about Jedi only being male (they can even be midget green aliens with pointy ears) but the Storm Troopers just makes no fucking sense, especially if the first order is trying to be ruthlessly efficient (why have regular people be Storm Troopers when they can just pick a solid performer and clone him multiple times?)

      Though admittedly I'm not a big Star Wars fan to begin with, so my understanding of the lore could be off.

  10. *facepalm* by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tim Cook: Oh no! Hardware sales are falling! What can we do?
    exec: Stop making stupid hardware and go back to making stuff people actually want?
    Tim Cook: No no that can't be it. We've just saturated the market so we need to start doing something else.

    1. Re:*facepalm* by sootman · · Score: 1

      Tim Cook, 2014: Hardware sales are going well, but OBVIOUSLY they won't continue to climb FOREVER. We should think of some other things so we can keep making money once THE INEVITABLE happens. Maybe we can get into content. People will ALWAYS need content. And it takes time. You can't just build a substantial amount overnight. We'd better start thinking about this now.
      The Market, 2016: Hardware sales slump.
      The Internet, 2017: Shits itself writing about how Apple is doomed.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  11. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Ah... The glory days of Apple. Remember when they used to be relevant?

    Remember the glory days of Microsoft? Those are over too. Once upon a time, they asked "Where do you want to go today?" Now, they just say "We know where you've been and what you're doing right now."

  12. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Yvan256 · · Score: 2

    The cake is a lie.

  13. Thin actors only and no unions! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Thin actors only and no unions!

  14. Fine, open up MacOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If Apple wants to be a services and software oriented company and move away from making hardware, fine... but please, for all that is good, open up support for MacOS onto standard PC hardware so us Mac users can get on with life without struggling with under powered and antiquated hardware for no good reason.

    Also, while you are at it, please work out whatever issues you have with Nvidia and help them release their pascal drivers on MacOS...

    Thank you,

    A concerned long time customer that is very much not alone.

    1. Re:Fine, open up MacOS by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Apple has no future as anything other than a hardware company. The software side was simply to provide support for the hardware. To think they'll somehow transition into the over saturated dog eat dog world of the entertainment industry is crazy. The iPod allowed them to leverage the music business for iTunes but it's not where their money is.

  15. Where does this lead? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

    So... everyone is making their own original content. What I've seen from Amazon and Netflix is often quite good. Will it end up like TV where they will syndicate each other's old seasons or do they hold out so you'll subscribe for a few months to each of them to rotate through binging their series in turn? I subscribe to Netflix because I find enough to watch, we have Prime Video as a value-add to Amazon Prime... we'll sign back up for HBO Now to watch GoT and plan to binge Westworld in between episodes of GoT. It seems like there'll be some conglomeration of some kind as the competition gets more entrenched.

    1. Re:Where does this lead? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That's what I wonder about the others. If Apple, and later Microsoft (they're likely to follow) start producing media content, then media companies might wanna consider getting into hardware of their own. Companies like Echostar, Charter, Comcast (ugh) et al should look into making their own branded computers. There is plenty of hardware, and plenty of software (Linux and BSD based) to choose from.

      I'd like to see more competition in hardware, not just in shows that I don't watch

  16. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Agreed. TV for fanboys and snowflakes.

    "Puffy the Android Slayer"
    "Game of Scones -A Starbuck's Saga"
    "I, Phone" - Humans and robot phones live in a future dystopia
    "Family Guys" - A story of a transgender fluid girl and her eleven dads and 2 1/2 mothers.

  17. Fire Tim Cook now by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    Calling Cook the Ballmer of Apple is an insult to Ballmer because at least Ballmer consistently raised revenues and profits and demonstrated a deep commitment to Microsoft's core markets. The fact is that putting Steve Ballmer in charge of Apple now would make more sense than keeping Cook. Ballmer would probably have a better shot of resurrecting the Mac's nose-diving reputation than Cook at this point.

    1. Re:Fire Tim Cook now by avandesande · · Score: 1

      At least MS didn't have the hubris to believe they can do anything on a whim. When they got into video games, they bought a successful studio and let them run semi-autonomously.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    2. Re:Fire Tim Cook now by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Calling Cook the Ballmer of Apple is an insult to Ballmer because at least Ballmer consistently raised revenues and profits and demonstrated a deep commitment to Microsoft's core markets. The fact is that putting Steve Ballmer in charge of Apple now would make more sense than keeping Cook. Ballmer would probably have a better shot of resurrecting the Mac's nose-diving reputation than Cook at this point.

      Let's ignore that especially in the later years of Balmer, Microsoft's revenue and profits was very volatile.

      You can only make the claim about Cook's performance because he introduced the iPhone 6 (Plus) at the end of 2014, and because that product was so outstandingly successful that 2015 was a black swan year for Apple. If Apple had sold 22 million less iPhone 6 (Plus), there would be a nice steady growth for both 2015 and 2016.

      IOW claim that Cook wasn't successful hinges on the fact that he was extremely successful in one year. And that's just plain nuts.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  18. Re:An Apple a day keeps Paradise away! by dehachel12 · · Score: 1

    >one man (nude), one women (nude)
    And a shower ?

  19. AppleTV TV by Krakadoom · · Score: 1

    Among the sizzling innovations in the new Apple programming will be that you can no longer turn off your TV or stop playback once you've started an episode, it will automatically perform "updates" of your platform to prevent non-Apple content being played back in the future, and you will need to sign over your firstborn and put your house up as collateral to create a streaming account in the first place.

  20. Saturation by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what everyone said when Netflix started making shows? Turned out OK for them.

    There is a lot of content out there. A lot of it is garbage. A lot of shows are canned because they aren't popular *enough* for a particular demographic. Or because a network head doesn't like a producer, or production company, or director.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Saturation by avandesande · · Score: 1

      If they somehow cannibalize 100% of netflix's business that's a whole 400 million in profits

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  21. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to figure out what market Apple is targeting. It sure isn't the 14 to 24 group.

  22. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Presumably they'll patent the whole concept and put netflix out of business.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  23. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Maritz · · Score: 1

    Mmm, windows 10 spying, the second most original joke floating around just behind oooooo samsung phones explode all the time.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  24. Too late by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    They already made Queer as Folk.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Too late by cute-boy · · Score: 1

      Your point is...?

  25. Series Idea by romanr · · Score: 1

    Maybe they could do a series ala Seinfeld, but the characters could spend every show looking for their mis-placed wireless AirPods.

  26. Economics and ego, not social justice by swb · · Score: 2

    Netflix recently remade "One Day at a Time" with a Latino family.

    For Hollywood, reselling the same crap in a new box has always been a ticket to profit, or at least less loss. And the egos in Hollywood like to believe that their shows somehow contain a kernel of universal truth.

    So I'm pretty sure the thinking is along the lines of "there's a whole bunch of Latinos who probably never saw One Day at a Time. If we remake it with a Latino cast, we can recycle 9 years of scripts for the cost of writing 2 years of an original program, and ODaaT was successful because of its timeless and placeless insights into the human condition, so of course Latinos will lap it up with a Latino cast. We'll make millions."

    It's really no different than the recycling of Japanese horror movies into American horror movies, or, really, these modern versions of Shakespeare plays that get turned out once in a while, or even "The Office".

  27. how many extra dongles? by Idisagree · · Score: 1

    & how much courage will be needed for this?

  28. It's all about Jan 31 by trevc · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately these days it is just the next earnings statement that matters. 3 months at a time is all the planning that's needed.

  29. Fonzi scheme by Trilobyte · · Score: 1

    Wow, Apple has jumped the shark before even producing their first episode.

    Maybe declining revenue from hardware sales could instead be addressed by a return to offering compelling and valuable hardware choices for the consumer to purchase.

    (/me waits for news that Apple's new content was produced using tools from Adobe or Avid)

  30. Editorializing by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    That "as hardware sales soften" is pure editorializing. The author is linking this initiative with hardware sales for his own reasons.

  31. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by mallyn · · Score: 1
    You forgot. San Francisco is the gayest city in the country (if not the planet). So, this has to have a gay theme as well. There is lots of material to draw from. You can do many episodes on Harvey Milk alone. And that is not even touching what the AIDS crisis has done. Take the move We Were There. That would fit in nice with this offering.

    For music, we don't have to go further than the San Francisco Gay Mens Chorus and their long history with the city.

    If Apple can play their cards right and plan accordingly, this can be a wonderful asset (and beacon) for the worldwide GLBTQ community.

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  32. And this time next year by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    We get to hear all about how piracy is killing Apple, Beeeeeeelions in lost profits, the company is tanking on account of all of these freeloaders watching our content for freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

    We need a host of new laws on the books to protect us all from these criminal consumers!
     

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  33. Port XCode by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1
    Seriously, end the tyrrany and oppression of having XCode bundled with OSX. I want to stop buying Apple Products all together because the new Macbook Pro is a piece of shit and I'm not sure their fucked up AirBuds will fit my ears - but need to still have the ability to create iOS Apps without having to use VNC

    Frankly, Apple is fucked -- Tim Cook was a good lackey for Jobs, but has not sense of purpose or direction The smart move would have been for him to find a younger, brilliant, "jobs-like" replacement that he could have mentored Instead, Cook tried to be Jobs and has in a few short years lost momentum and marketability across all of Apple's products Within a few more years, Apple will be back to downsizing and begging for money to live

  34. Result by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    You: "I don't like this TV show from the Apple network."

    S. Jobs: "You're watching it wrong!"

  35. Dear Apple by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    Dear Apple,

    How about making products your customers actually want? Like a MacBook Pro that's actually a pro-level computer. Or, a "Cheesegrater" Mac Pro with Thunderbolt and USB 3/3.1?

    See, here's the deal: no one wanted the trash-can Mac Pro. We wanted the existing model with the I/O capabilities you put in your home-user machines. But, it's too late. You've lost us. We're tired of paying premium prices for last-years already outdated technology.

    And you guys are really missing the bus with your lack of VR-compatible hardware. Sure, VR might be a flash in the pan, but isn't the fact that you make NOTHING with the CPU/GPU power to support it worrying?

    Yours,
    RatBastard, a former Mac customer.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  36. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    Each show will feature bearded hipsters from San Francisco, dialog about organic food, and indie music from pitchfork.

    Sounds better than most of the TV out there.

  37. Me too! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I want to do what Amazon, Netflix and Hulu do!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  38. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Except Microsoft never stopped being relevant. Apple on the other hand is on the cusp of becoming irrelevant.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  39. Re:Yeah, I'm sure that'll be a success by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    Each show will feature bearded hipsters from San Francisco, dialog about organic food, and indie music from pitchfork.

    Hunh? Google will make shows?

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  40. Re:An Apple a day keeps Paradise away! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    It'll be golden, I tell ya. Absolutely Yuge.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  41. Think different by akilone · · Score: 1

    So, the Apple slogan was think different, revolutionize and now is just to generate money. This and other few things indicates that inertia of SJ is slowly fading out. They do nothing in last 5 years apart from the chairmans sharing enormous salaries. It is really sad. SJ wanted to redo TV, education but they touch none of those. Now they want to make movies? Wtf. That is really inovative and revolutionary. It just show that they have no clue what they are doing with company. If iPhone 8 fails (be the same as three last iphone) I think that would be the final sign what future is going to be for Apple.