Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Reportedly Working On a 'Lightweight Version of Windows' Known As 'Cloud Shell' (neowin.net)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Neowin: Last week, details emerged of Microsoft's plans to develop a single, unified, 'adaptive shell' for Windows 10. Known as the 'Composable Shell', or CSHELL, the company's efforts were said to be focused on establishing a universal Windows 10 version with a standardized framework to scale and adapt the OS to any type of device, display size or user experience, including smartphones, PCs, tablets, consoles, large touchscreens, and more. Today, Petri reported that Microsoft is working on a new shell for Windows known as 'Cloud Shell'. According to internal documentation referred to in that report, Cloud Shell is described as a "lightweight version of Windows designed for the modern computing world." It also hints at plans to introduce the Cloud Shell sometime in 2017 -- but little else is known about the new shell besides that. Cloud Shell is said to be connected, in some way, with the Windows Store and Universal Windows Platform app framework, and the report speculates that it may also be related to Microsoft's plans to bring the full version of Windows 10 to mobile devices with ARM-based processors, which it announced in December. However, the cloud nomenclature, and the reference to this being a 'lightweight' version of Windows could hint at a 'thin client'-style approach, in which the Windows 10 shell could be streamed from Microsoft's Azure platform to any device with an internet connection, while its cloud servers remotely handle all of the processing and storage requirements of each users' tasks.

13 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Internal name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interestingly, the internal name is Universal Data Harvester.

  2. Windows Store/Universal Platform by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cloud Shell is said to be connected, in some way, with the Windows Store and Universal Windows Platform app framework,

    Does anyone even use either of those?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  3. rumors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rumors claiming that a space was misplaced by one character during creation of the marketing materials, and the product was originally to be called "Clouds Hell" cannot be confirmed at this time.

  4. Microsoft sells cshells by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft sells cshells by the sea shore.
    The shells Microsoft sells are surely cshells.
    So if Microsoft sells shells on the seashore,
    I’m sure Microsoft sells seashore shells.

  5. So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... hey we have all this billions invested in WindowsPhone OS that we don't know what to do with since we plan to leave the market? Any ideas?

    1. Re: So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is someone earning over $400k and still sharing a room? Are you both living on the ISS?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. 64 bit x86 by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about getting 64 bit x86 to work instead of emulating 32 bit x86 which is 1980s technology?

  7. Chrome OS? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't this sound awfully like the Chrome OS? Just Microsoft running the servers instead of Google?

  8. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People often don't know what they want, until they're given it, there's the (possibly apocryphal) Henry Ford quote:

    If I'd asked customers what they wanted, they would have said "a faster horse".

  9. Re:Yay by OtisSnerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another product no one asked for or wanted.

    You're missing the idea that this is a three letter agency and data harvesting company wet dream. Now, they don't even need back doors into your desktops, only to the cloud back end.

  10. See how the mighty had fallen ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    20 years ago, someone would have a bright idea. Some venture capitalists might see some potential. They will work feverishly on it. Microsoft might get a wind of it. And it will just release a press release saying it is considering working on the same idea. That's it. The VCs will flee like they had seen ebola. Funding gone, the startup will die.

    Now people just make fun of Microsoft, when it says vaguely plausible things they might have actually invested on. Even stupid idea like warehousing products in the near earth orbit and delivering packages using Multiple Independently Targeted Re-entry Vehicles by Amazon would be discussed seriously. But Microsoft? nah! No one believes it can do what it says it wants to do. Including the VP in charge of the project.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  11. Back full circle by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And just like that we are back to the days of mainframes/dumb terminals except that know we will call it the cloud/thin client. The reason are simple, vendor lock-in, walled gardens and "services" instead of ownership means you can milk your clients for years instead of selling them something once

  12. Re:Yay by chipschap · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only on the cshore.