Slashdot Mirror


This Week 'IT Issues' Ground Delta Airlines' Flights (cnbc.com)

Delta Air Lines has been forced to cancel at least 150 flights, and expects to cancel even more. But "the IT department is working to rectify the situation as soon as possible," they tweeted Sunday -- more than four hours ago. Long-time Slashdot reader SonicSpike quotes CNBC: Delta Air Lines U.S. domestic flights were grounded on Sunday evening due to automation issues, according to an advisory from the Federal Aviation Administration... "Delta teams are expeditiously working to fix a systems outage that has resulted in departure delays for flights on the ground," the airline said in the statement. "Flights in the air remain unaffected". [And their international flights were unaffected.]
Delta also grounded 2,000 flights last summer after a computer outage caused by a power outage in Atlanta. At the time Reuters reported that "Airlines will likely suffer more disruptions... because major carriers have not invested enough to overhaul reservations systems based on technology dating to the 1960s." And sure enough, just last week, another "IT issue" forced United Airlines to ground all their domestic flights.

141 comments

  1. H1B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    'Nuff said.

    1. Re: H1B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Our bestest Mandacrishna university teaches a 3 month Masters in PhD for rocket science. We accept credit cards. You will be a very good rocket science PhD, our priests guarantee it. Upon passing you will get H1B visa to work as an american scientist. No experience required.
      Dear, revert us application for the same.

    2. Re: H1B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rockets guided by prayers, how quaint. We accept Catholic, hindu, and Jewish Visa Cards. We do not accept Muslim VISAs temporarily, because of Trumps ban. Kidding, only pulling you leg. We do not give an heavenly fuck about Trump.

  2. Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Alternative facts will surely prove the travel ban has been a yuge success and America is now greater than it was a week ago.

    1. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TLDR

    2. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you cared to finish school you'd know there is a hysteresis loop to every natural macro-phenomena. What you are observing is the effect from the final days of obama.

    3. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      This is obviously fake, Trump doesn't have a massive anything. Not his hands, not his bank account, not his brain, and definitely not his penis.

    4. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His dad probably raped him a few times, too. LOL

    5. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dad raped him and he blames Trump instead because stockholm syndrome.

    6. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hysteresis

      I VOTED for GRANDMA and SHE WON because I'M WITH HER.

    7. Re:Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same thing happened to me with Michelle Obama! Its a small world!

    8. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ego?

    9. Re:Fake News! by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Maybe the guy supposed to do the antivirus patching couldnt get back from his holiday after the ban :)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    10. Re:Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously fake because it doesn't follow the proper form of Donald Trump strapping him to his seat in the Trumpmobile and liberally touching his junk. FAIL.

    11. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next time you're staring in the mirror wondering why everyone hates you, just remember: it's because you're worthless.

    12. Re: Fake News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I get a Goofy Time image macro with a Trump mask instead?

    13. Re:Fake News! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Alternate Facts are already dominating the narrative. People get held up by customs all the time. Liberals only start to care when they can blame Trump. They don't care about Ukranian grannies getting deported. They're oblivious.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  3. Fall of an Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The first to go is the infrastructure as this empire rots from within.

    1. Re:Fall of an Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Trumpire has great plans for infrastructure starting with a wall which you should help build starting now.

  4. Windows 10 update? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Was it one of those that after auto-rebooting, it BSODs?

    1. Re:Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I suspect ransomware. They just don;t want to say so. Several airlines have been affected like this recently.

    2. Re: Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never blame a US corporation for what you can easily blame on Russian hackers. They rigged the election, brought down the power grid, and now this! The NSA & FBI have proof*

      *Disclaimer: No actual evidence provided but they're really, really, really, really, really sure.

    3. Re:Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, not ransom ware. Delta recently outsourced it's infra to Microsoft and 3rd party contractors. We weren't even able to log into email on the intranet during all this. Security certs out of date, and everything is now on *ugh* SharePoint. Intranet used to be fast, albeit it was organized horribly. They they announced the "new" deltanet which was all SharePoint. Now it's 4 times slower, but hey, it'll look good on a tablet and has slick animations while you're dying of old age waiting for the pages to load.

    4. Re:Windows 10 update? by Santas+L+Helper · · Score: 2

      I can tell you are an insider, and so am I. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!!!! Now when I login to DLnet no matter the browser its a crap shoot whether or not I will login. I always get security issues left and right. The new website is pretty but what good is it if when I need to list for a flight I have to wait an unknown amount of time before I can actually get in. A horrible decision on their part and I hope they're moving away from microsoft garbage.

    5. Re:Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of it , it must be an Indian IT firm providing the service. No other company can be that inefficient.

    6. Re:Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs ransomware when you can hire an Indian IT guy to do all the damage.

    7. Re: Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can refute anything if 1/inf is enough. You can only be really really really really sure the universe exists because of the Descartes Demon.

      Disclaimer: Xeno's paradox says you'll never get hit by the arrow.

  5. Ransomware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was ransomware (a cryptolocker variant) that got the Delta computers.

    1. Re: Ransomware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, indo-chimp street shitting coder clicked a link while exchanging porn messages with stupid indo-cows of his tribe of jihadists.

  6. Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and they're blaming the weather so they're not giving out hotel or food vouchers. My credit card is maxed, so this is going to be painful.

    1. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Delta shutdown their website because they got tired of complaints. I was also stranded Aug 8th, and they refuse to pay for a taxi or a hotel. Luckily I was able to steal food from a stewardess who left her bad to go get death threats from her boss. They screamed that they wanted her to die.

    2. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They blame everything on the weather. Last time I was stuck with delta they beat my six year old daughter almost to death. They blamed me for their computers being down.

    3. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your credit card is maxed? Ew. You're a poor moron.

    4. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I work for Delta, and this is weather related so no one should get vouchers.

    5. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aug 8th was weather related since it was weather that caused computer problems. This also looks like weather since we're refusing to give food or hotel vouchers.

    6. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what happens when you fly Trump Air, you're lucky Donald didn't take your 6 year old into the lavatory to meet Mister Carrot!

    7. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian hackers hacked the weather!!!

    8. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't understand why this got modded as funny since that is what Delta was claiming last night when they refused to pay for my hotel.

  7. When will it change? by imidan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How long can the airlines go on like this? Somewhere in office buildings around the country, there are MBAs and accountants working for various airlines who have compared the cost of in-house IT with the cost of outsourcing, and they all once decided that outsourcing was best. Somehow, I doubt they've included in their calculations the true frequency (and therefore cost) of IT failures that ground the entire airline for days. As these events stack up, these guys are going to have to re-evaluate their models for predicting the frequency and severity of failures, and at some point it's going to look like a good idea to have a real IT staff on-hand to keep systems working in the first place, and to deal with it when shit hits the fan.

    1. Re:When will it change? by speedplane · · Score: 1

      How long can the airlines go on like this? Somewhere in office buildings around the country, there are MBAs and accountants working for various airlines who have compared the cost of in-house IT with the cost of outsourcing, and they all once decided that outsourcing was best.

      Why does everyone assume that Delta outsourced this work abroad?

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    2. Re:When will it change? by imidan · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone assume that Delta outsourced this work abroad?

      I said nothing about abroad.

    3. Re:When will it change? by imidan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In fact, to enhance upon my reply from a few minutes ago, it appears that in 2006, Delta outsourced its IT operations to IBM [1]. It was a seven year agreement, so I don't know who does it now. But I doubt it's Delta.

      Assuming this is still the situation: I don't know on what continent Delta's IT people are stationed at this point, but that's hardly the issue. The issue is, wherever they are, they aren't competently managing Delta's IT infrastructure. They had a similarly airline-grounding outage in August, about six months ago.

      If management were able to recognize the value of investment in IT, they could have taken steps over the years to develop a system that isn't this fragile. Presumably, back in 2006, when they went into bankruptcy, someone convinced them that IT wasn't a "core competency" because it would save the airline a bunch of money to outsource it. Since then, they've been accumulating tech debt because nobody at HQ actually owns IT anymore... they think it's just a service that they pay for. It doesn't appear to be working out for them.

      [1] http://www.informationweek.com...?

    4. Re:When will it change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...IT wasn't a "core competency"....
      If bookings are not the heart of the airline business, what can be said for any business that does not take full control of its sales and billings?
      A booking system has to be the heart of an airline, just as much as airplanes and their maintenance.

    5. Re:When will it change? by starblazer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      DL just recently bought their software back in house Two things I know is that the Holiday development freeze is over and they do software loads occasionally. If I had to be a betting man, one of their loads went bad.

    6. Re: When will it change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the same AC, but why is this modded down? IBM is well known for staffing primarily from India these days. What's the matter /., don't like facts anymore? Overhaul this worthless moderation system so numpties can stop abusing it, thanks.

    7. Re:When will it change? by myid · · Score: 1

      DL just recently bought their software back in house

      On the web page that lists open IT jobs for Delta, most jobs are in Atlanta, GA, and a few are in Minneapolis, MN.

      I don't know how many of their IT employees are H-1Bs, though.

    8. Re: When will it change? by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

      I was more thinking along the lines of Overhaul Slashdot itsself to stop all the stupid garbage flaimbait storys that attract the kind of morons that abuse the moderation system.

    9. Re:When will it change? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      IT is important to the operation hence you outsource it to those who specialize in IT. Airports are also critical to Deltas operations. Delta doesnt try to run Airports does it?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    10. Re:When will it change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be a mandatory law for companies to publish the number of H1B or B1 visa employees they hire in the company. Instead of banning muslims from those 7 countries Trump should ban people from India as they would do more damage to Us economy than any terrorist can ever do.

    11. Re: When will it change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a Delta IT contractor? Go attend you work.

    12. Re: When will it change? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I was more thinking along the lines of Overhaul Slashdot itsself to stop all the stupid garbage flaimbait storys that attract the kind of morons that abuse the moderation system.

      Pay attention Alanis, that is actually fucking ironic.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    13. Re:When will it change? by lgw · · Score: 1

      It should be a mandatory law for companies to publish the number of H1B or B1 visa employees they hire in the company.

      It is the law. Also, all of their salaries are published. It used to be fun to match these salaries to specific people in the office (by hiring date, IIRC).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:When will it change? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      This. "core competency". From experience it is due to cutbacks or fiscal restraint and at the decision of management. They only want to spend on "Core" things. At one point I was more less refused promotion because my position in "IT" wasn't considered "core". In *many* occurrences I've had project funds rejected for upgrades, because they were not "core" to the business. Trying to tell a manager how functional the promoted workers that were considered "core" that use said systems, or how the business as a whole is going to function when those "non-core" systems fail is a hard sell. In most cases it isn't an abrupt change but rather a slow degradation of service as systems and support become more difficult to maintain. Over the years, you do get "tech debt" as the issues keep piling up, and in the case of positions, if they are not valued, then why stick around?

      I know I was pretty shocked and offended when I was told my position wasn't part of "core" business (I also thought it was pretty short sighted and ludicrous), and knew the writing was on the wall with that manager and in that position. Fortunately it worked out moving to a business and position where it was considered "core".

      As mentioned the system wasn't probably fragile to begin with. However any system will become so over time though neglect. I have no doubt that management due to fiscal issues did as you said. Which isn't necessarily bad, the whole system as a service when done right. However the other buzz word other than "core competency" than management loves to throw around (without seeming to understand or grasp the real meaning) is "Risk Management". Which basically means we're going to do things half-assed and accept the risk that it will bring to the table. Well that "risk" just materialized. What mitigation plans did they put in place, who is responsible for it in terms of lost revenue? I'd guess they don't have real answers for either of those questions.

    15. Re: When will it change? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Itsself as well.

      Very ironic though.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    16. Re: When will it change? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      lol thanks. I actually missed 'itsself'.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  8. Re:That's what they get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm sure that uneducated racists are great coders.

    Either that or they are just compensating for their own inadequacy by spreading Trump-style lies about people who are better than them.

  9. Re:That's what they get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans just don't have the street-shitting skills to be coders.

  10. Technical Debt by byteherder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is simply a case of technical debt being piled on top technical debt. Don't blame anyone but management. Marketing screaming for more features and MBAs running a business that is a large technical enterprise. 50 years of added crap on top of crap and this is what you get, IT issues, outages, "power failures", automation issues. Each one causing tens of millions is losses. What the airline industry needs is a large IT colonic and then some good design to move forward.

    You are not going to be able to fix this problem with the same thinking that got you into it.

    1. Re:Technical Debt by imidan · · Score: 2

      I think it'll be a super hard sell to get them to do a hard reboot on their whole system. But why not begin introducing a service oriented architecture that could be gradually rolled out and replace systems incrementally? Start with the most fragile systems and linkages and rebuild the whole system in situ?

      I mean, I know it'll be more complicated than that simple statement, but at least it's a better plan than trying to install better and better windproofing to prevent the house of cards from toppling.

    2. Re:Technical Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Computers are dead easy. Why my 10-year old nephew Norman wrote a program that makes a dot move randomly around the scheme.

      Anyone can do it, so why pay a bunch of overpriced primmadonnas when there are people out there who will do the work for much less?

      It's not so difficult to write a booking system. All You Have To Do Is...

    3. Re:Technical Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it'll be a super hard sell to get them to do a hard reboot on their whole system. But why not begin introducing a service oriented architecture that could be gradually rolled out and replace systems incrementally? Start with the most fragile systems and linkages and rebuild the whole system in situ?

      I mean, I know it'll be more complicated than that simple statement, but at least it's a better plan than trying to install better and better windproofing to prevent the house of cards from toppling.

      The first thing they need, if they don't already have it is a fairly accurate copy of their _entire_ system. Any simplifications must be justified. That way they can fully test new software before deploying it, ideally over an extended time.

      That (probably) won't happen of course. There are too many interlinked systems, but they need to try to get close. Beyond that higher some competent architects to create a path to improve the system.

      Again, I wouldn't have software engineers do more than help the architects plan initially. All systems should probably require 2 factor authentication, if there is any chance of modifying data, along with white list security, no web browsers, or limited run through a heavily locked down proxy, no usb ports, etc, etc.

      This is all a fixable issue. They just need to invest...

    4. Re:Technical Debt by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Planes might be a technical enterprise. Airlines are not. They are mostly marketing and financial engineering. Everything else can and is subcontracted out.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    5. Re:Technical Debt by byteherder · · Score: 1

      For an airline, the planes are the physical part of the enterprise and they need to own or lease those assets. As for IT, I would put reservations and scheduling is a critical core competency that I would never want to outsource. If those fail, you are screwed and so would never want to hand your fate to another company. Other functions like email or IT security, no reason not to subcontract them out. Marketing and financial engineering, well, most major companies these days are just marketing machines.

    6. Re: Technical Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah lock down the computers shat a magical solution. they already do that and look where it got then. fucking idiot

    7. Re:Technical Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's basically like house flippers. Each CEO inherits something that on the outside looks like a good business. They slap on some paint, upgrade some appliances, but leave the bones to rot. Everyone knows it's only a matter of time before the structure begins to visibly crack, but as long as they can unload it to the next sucker, it's all good. Mmm.. hot potato.

    8. Re:Technical Debt by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      The short answer to this is that they have probably tried and failed. These systems are so archaic and complicated that it's amazing that they work at all. In fact, trying to do what you suggest very well may have been the source of the failure!

    9. Re:Technical Debt by lgw · · Score: 1

      An airline's core enterprise is the same as Walmart's: logistics. The IT system that manages this is pretty much the whole airline. Much more than just bookings: maintaining the entire schedule of flights, along with some small pool of redundant equipment. Every airplane maintenance log and pilot hours tracking. What food to stock every flight with. It's all logistics, and without that IT system to manage it, there's no airline left. You'd think they'd act like it was important, but apparently not: just one more cost to be minimized.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Technical Debt by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Walmart as much as it is criticized has a superb highly paid IT department. They view IT as a way to minimize costs and part of the team that is core of the business.

      That is the problem with outsourcing. Sure you can say a bank is not competent to run the cafeteria so outsource that. However, IT just like delivery drivers is really part of the whole process.

      They are not a lawfirm or accounting firm either. But doesn't Walmart or Delta need competent accountants and lawyers verses shitty ones? YOU bet!

    11. Re:Technical Debt by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The assumption in your argument is in house are better. Many would say if you want the best go to a firm who specialize in IT rather than trying to build your own out of scotch tape and servers.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  11. Must have upgraded to Windows 10 by SWPadnos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somewhere, there's a computer that's "Preparing to configure Windows" after it rebooted in the middle of a flight scheduling run.

    Or stuck at a BIOS prompt saying "No keyboard found, press F1 to continue."

    --
    - The Sigless Wonder
    1. Re:Must have upgraded to Windows 10 by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Somewhere, there's a computer that's "Preparing to configure Windows" after it rebooted in the middle of a flight scheduling run." ...And stuck in a reboot loop of "Windows Update Failed" and "Preparing Windows update."

    2. Re:Must have upgraded to Windows 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the "total cost of deploying on windows"

  12. Re:Trump's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical offended female reaction to shun the offender will not help you when he reaches in to grab your pussy.

  13. Systems from the 1960's by evolutionary · · Score: 2

    Wow, if they are so economical (cheap) they use reservation tech from that era, maybe they'd consider hiring contractors from India to give the system an overhaul. Of course the contracting firm will probably just hand it over to a bunch of juniors who will then use techniques/tech/flaws from the 1990's, but that's still an improvement, right?

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Systems from the 1960's by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

      For more information, the airlines are running on TPF from IBM. IBM still updates it, so it's not ancient, and it runs on beefy modern hardware. IBM claims it's extremely stable, fwiw. However, the airlines have built up a lot of systems around it, like their online booking services, for example, and they have some middleware that they seem to have written themselves to interface with TPF. The middleware and front end systems seem to have synchronization issues.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Systems from the 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who does IBM employ to do their work, hmmm?

    3. Re:Systems from the 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curry chimps. One of them banged on the wrong keyboard yesterday. No banana for him!

    4. Re:Systems from the 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bah.
      The core system can't be "extremely stable". If all that breaks is the "online booking", then the airline wouldn't be grounded. They'd fly around with planes half-full of people who bought their tickets weeks in advance - a large part of the customer base. If the online booking breaks, you can't book online. You can still book by phoning them or showing up at their desk in the airport - where the core system is used directly. And you can still show up with your two week old tickets.

      Having the web-based frontend break will sure cost them, as customers then move on to a competing airline. But it won't put all planes on the ground, unless booking stays down for a whole month. Therefore, we know the core system broke too.

    5. Re:Systems from the 1960's by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Seems like they believed you and brought the work back to US and are thus facing operational issues. IT needs a crazy work ethic or massive overstaffing to ensure everything runs soothly during the peak bug periods. Once you work with Indian companies where you staff with the minimum but stuff keeps running because folks give up their nights and weekends and then you try to bring the work back to US but with same levels of staffing you run into these problems. Either you need to have extra folks or you need to build the same work ethic into Americans (which will only happen if there is widespread poverty in America and IT workers are thankful to have a job. Trump has made a good start on that path)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    6. Re:Systems from the 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no love for India as a country, I think it's a shithole. But then I think of you - a multi-jowled fat knuckle-dragging cunt, and I think - they're probably all better than you. That must be really fucking annoying.

  14. Dup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait. Coulda sworn I just saw this one here...

  15. Re: That's what they get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, uneducated cousin-fucking retard, why don't you get the fuck off the internet if you don't want to hear the truth?

    Go back to your shitty small town if you prefer like-minded dimwitted retards who will pretend like you aren't a sad fucking shell of a man lashing out at those who are better than you...

  16. Re: That's what they get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama deployed my cousins and they got killed and now my family are all dead and I have to suck my own cock.

  17. Buy Stratus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should have invested in a Stratus, then their system would have stayed up for at least 24 years?

  18. Re: That's what they get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump deployed his tiny hands into the urine stream of an underage Russian KGB prostitute, and now he has to suck Putin's cock.

  19. Re: That's what they get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The indo-njggers have goats?? Lucky! Here in the Trumptown shanty all we have are rats and skunks.

  20. Probably should have charged more by sidekick2 · · Score: 1

    If only they charged $300 per bag, maybe, just maybe they'd have enough funds to update their 1960s equipment?

    1. Re:Probably should have charged more by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If they were running 1960s equipment they would not have a problem. It's like collapsing on the floor when you pencil breaks, dude, not a problem get a sharpener and sharpen that pencil and away you go.

      The problem is companies in the insane greed who think they can completely abandon manual backups. When digital fails and it always will, always, not maybe will fail but always will fail, just a matter of when and how bad. No manual systems to fall back on and you shut down.

      The US is heading for a major fall, next time a solar flare heads their way, Complete economic collapse because it will take months to repaid because of a complete absence of manual systems to fall back on.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Probably should have charged more by Maritz · · Score: 2

      A large solar flare will take out all the transformers, so you probably won't be running much of anything, electronic or otherwise.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    3. Re:Probably should have charged more by starblazer · · Score: 1

      They have their manual backups. The problems lie in whether to start using the manual backups or just wait it out. Given a severe enough incident, they would start scribbling stuff on pencil and paper. It would just take forever and cancel about 70% of the flights because they couldn't handle the volume manually.

    4. Re:Probably should have charged more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This - I'm an airline IT guy, and the most dreaded words for airport ops to hear are "go to manual." They will try to wait it out as long as possible because it's an absolute disaster doing manual processing, and reconciling the manual stuff after the outage has passed. One of the airlines I worked for had a complete and total system outage across all airports systemwide for 4 hours...it took days to get back to normal ops. That was a datacenter failure, not a software problem.

      The GP has never experienced the joy of waiting in a 200 person line and getting a handwritten boarding pass and bag tag from 1979.

    5. Re:Probably should have charged more by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I doubt you have ever been involved in establishing and maintaining manual system. You can not simply scribble stuff on bits of paper. Data needs to make it from one person to another, set formats, product descriptions, needed information all need to be taken care of, no notes, not computer, no previous forms to copy, all from scratch. Those manual systems to many years to develop and training to use. Your hope for the best attitude will work after about 6 months and a percentage of the population has died from starvation, quite a large percentage, let alone medical care.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  21. Re: Trump's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My tongue is frozen to your mother's fr1g1d anus.

  22. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You assume people are competent enough to do that at a failing company that is only barely surviving on government bailout money. Why not just let the company fail, generating interesting news in the process, and allow a better company to replace it?

  23. Who Needs Terrorism by dave562 · · Score: 1

    When incompetence seems to do as much damage.

    I wonder how long until the airlines receive a 'modernization bailout' ^H^H^H initiative

  24. Real Reason by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Real Reason: They've got to slow down the planes because it's hectic this week. I'm not sure why the airports are crazy, but they are. Something must have happened this week so they have to slow down the traffic.

  25. DUPE! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    When will slashdot stop with all the dupes.... Wait not a dupe? Again?

  26. Best and brightest? Probably not.... by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a developer, I can't imagine even bothering to answer an offer of employment from an airline these days. I spent considerable time looking for better options last year before deciding to take an offer and leave my employer of 20 years (HPE), and there were several potential employers I did avoid; work for any airline would have been a huge red flag for me. The way they've cut corners over the last few decades would definitely not make it a good place for career advancement.

    I suspect the quality of their hires in IT would be limited by their reputation as employers and probably tend toward the desperate only looking to fill immediate financial needs on a temporary basis. I can't say this would lead to the most inspired work effort.

    1. Re:Best and brightest? Probably not.... by ghoul · · Score: 0

      Desperate looking to deal with an immediate need describes the Manhattan project. Great things are achieved by desperate folks. Comfortable folks hardly ever achieve great stuff

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:Best and brightest? Probably not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Manhattan project brought together some of the greatest minds in our country and a limitless budget. I very much doubt Delta is looking for that sort of investment opportunity.

    3. Re:Best and brightest? Probably not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Southwest Airlines is the same way. The technology department is over 70% outsourced (i.e. Indian) "professional services" workers that turn over every 3-6 months. Their work is mediocre at best because they don't care for the long term of the system when they will be gone in 6 months. Southwest leadership considers IT a necessary evil and not a value add to the company and their decisions and treatment of employees really shows this. Even the head of the pilots union knows and commented on this. I've been with Southwest Airlines over 15 years and I don't feel my job is secure with all the bean counter driven outsourcing.

  27. Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Why does it have to physically be a wall. Even 2000 years ago the Romans could build walls, it's not exactly high tech. Sensors, cameras, drones, patrol units, etc. are real 21st century technology. Gather information on the board and take action, not put a wall up that anyone with a ladder or ultralight aircraft can circumvent.

    How many drug kingpins have pilots on their staff? Probably all of them.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Trump understands what a wall does. He doesn't understand all that shit you just came out with. So wall it is then!

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      A physical wall (or high fence, which is fine) is important in 2 ways: it's a symbol that this is not the place to enter, and it stop people from driving in. Sure, some people will always find a way, no doubt, but not a steady stream of millions. Mostly, though it's the symbol: we're no longer ignoring immigration law.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I still hope the 2006 film Idiocracy is only an amusing bit of entertainment and doesn't turn out to be prophetic. But my hope is pretty shaken.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it have to physically be a wall.

      Good point; I suggest a minefield and a few gun and missile emplacements. For a cheaper and more effective version, let good 'ole boys volunteer and set no bag limit.
      I'm not joking.

    5. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Why not pillars of light, Tribute in Light worked for the WTC memorial instead of rebuilding. Or so they say.

      Or we could not waste effort on building ineffective symbols. A very large portion of the US-Canada border is posted, at least the part on land.

      Don't a large number of illegal immigration enter over water, it's hard to put a fence in the ocean. Luckily we have a professional Coast Guard to do the job that a fence cannot do.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It Can't Happen Here (1935) - Sinclair Lewis had a Minute Men, which was a volunteer force that supported the fascist state but viewed themselves as patriots.

      I'm not saying Trump is a fascist, maybe a corporatist (whatever that is). But there are a lot of idiots that think fascist ideas are a bad ass cowboy way to get things done, but fascism isn't cool at all it's rather shitty and terrifying. (real cowboys would kill a fascist)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be perfect to help, is the point. Especially to help say "turn around, you're not welcome".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Or you could put up signs and posts that aren't disruptive to wildlife and property owners in the region and save taxpayers billions of dollars. It seems very ham-fisted and ineffective, it's indirectly my money so I feel like I should complain. (my representatives are all Democrats, so while I've contacted them I doubt they'll be able to alter matters any)

      If we're looking for symbols, maybe Trump could tweet about his views on immigration, and assume that most Mexicans read his tweets.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    9. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      Seems like you're really reaching for a reason not to have a wall. And it won't be "ineffective" - walls have helped to bolster the border security on nations for millennia. The idea that they're "ineffective" is farcical. No defensive measure by itself is ever adequate, and that's fine, it's the collection of such that works.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      This is the 21st century, not millennia ago.

      Numerous historic examples of large walls covering large territories that were not effective in stopping raids, soldiers or even refugees. If there is money to be made for a coyote to bring people into the US from Mexico, they'll find a way. It will be easy, you'll see.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    11. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      Do you have a lock on your front door? It's only even addresses the single most obvious path in, and it does nothing to stop a determined robber. But I'd call it "effective", because you start with the most obvious path. A wall will keep people from driving in. That's a big deal.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Is a false analogy supposed to be proof or even evidence of something? Speak plainly. I will not chase this strawman.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    13. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      The most straightforward way into your house is the door(s). Locking them is useful, even though there are many other ways into your house, the door can be kicked in, the lock can likely be opened with a "bump key", and so on. You still want a lock on your front door.

      The most straightforward way into the country illegally is to drive across the border (well, be driven by a coyote). Blocking that is useful, even though there are many other ways into the country. You still want a wall, fence, or similar physical barrier on your border.

      How was that in any way unclear?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    14. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's not even my house, you broke into Mr Strawman's house and he's pissed.

      Flying, driving, walking, climbing a ladder, without a way to detect incursions it's pointless. A barrier that I can hide behind while I dig, cut or climb my way through is not a effective. On the other hand travel over the remote parts of the board is very difficult terrain, and border agents have many miles to pick some one up before they will be able to reach a populated area and slip away. It's naive to think that crossing some imaginary line and an immigrant can declare victory, they only need to be picked up (assuming they don't pass out from dehydration, 95% of the border is rough country). If someone entered the country illegally and a camera tagged
      them for facial recognition we could wait days to pick them up and still stop more people than a wall would, and the border patrol takes hours in the worst case and minutes in the real hot zones today.

      Our unintentional creation of an industry to smuggle people into our country illegally is the bigger threat than the physical security of our border. Lax enforcement of labor laws and lack of an effective process to allow orderly legal immigration is to blame. If you're buying peaches 3 for $1 at the super market, they probably should have been closer to $3 each. A lot of employers in the chain skipped out on paying taxes and passing their costs onto the consumer (as business always do).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    15. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      without a way to detect incursions it's pointless

      Who is suggesting that the wall would be the only defense? It's an effective part of securing the border. I don't get why you have a problem with that. Any one system can be defeated by some. Defense in depth is what changes "some" to "almost none". It will never be none, of course; heck, people make it across the DMZ.

      If someone entered the country illegally and a camera tagged them for facial recognition we could wait days to pick them up and still stop more people than a wall would,

      Facial recognition only works if someone's face is already in your DB. It's very easy to disappear into the country if you don't have an established identity, bank account, residence, etc. This had been happening constantly with our "catch and release" program.

      Reduce the number of people making across the border to something manageable, and they can be caught by surveillance and met by the border patrol in trucks before they can go to ground.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Facial recognition only works if someone's face is already in your DB.

      That's not been my personal experience working in the industry of computer learning and image processing.

      I guess it's up to those who support building a wall to prove that it will work. The burden isn't really on my to prove it won't work, or we will just go around in circles in the classic proving a negative problem. I don't see how it can work, I've provided examples where it can be circumvented. End result of the wall is coyotes will charge a little more to smuggle people in, so anyone with slightly more money can still enter illegally, so net effect is essentially zero.

      Not that a discussion on slashdot means much. I'll at least be able to be smugly satisfied with an I-told-you-so, if you even remember this in 2-3 years (most aggressive case for building a wall). But the world as a whole will remain unchanged and indifferent to what we've discussed.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    17. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's not been my personal experience working in the industry of computer learning and image processing.

      How do you know who you've recognized, pray tell? Are you advocating arresting the next Mexican-American who steps in front of a government camera and their faces match up with your scan? That would be a Hell of a thing.

      I guess it's up to those who support building a wall to prove that it will work.

      Nope, Election. Done deal. The wall will be yuuuuuuge.

      , I've provided examples where it can be circumvented

      Every security system in the world, by itself, can be circumvented, for fucks sake. What a moron.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    18. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure your reps/senetors are against it?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Many Dems supported the last expansion. It is kind of normal for a country to want secure borders.

      https://www.senate.gov/legisla...

      Both Clinton and Obama voted Yea. This wasn't even controversial then, but now, it is Trump, so we must gnash our teeth.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  28. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a real piece of garbage.

    I know a lot of guys like you, they say they're joking but it's really a passive aggressive behavior. Coward.

  29. It doesn't always go your way by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Desperate projects in the private sector usually turn out to be Sisyphian tasks.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  30. sabre airline solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is an indian sweatshop where people dont even have fixed desks to work at. tiny ass fucking laptops. i worked there 6 months and was hamstrung by technological and beurocratic bullshit i just moved on to something else. not surprising. they like to bring in these guys from shithole countries and give them enough money to make payments on a fancy car and nice apartment then they spend 100 hours a week slaving away writing really shitty code if writing any code at all.

  31. Re:MAr;E by Maritz · · Score: 1

    So, have you not actually realised that slashdot shows the linked domain beside the link? Are you stupid?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  32. I'll bet I know what the proposed solution will be by computational+super · · Score: 1

    More meetings, more stand ups, shorter sprints, a "collaborative" open office so the boss can stare at everybody all day long, code-quality measurement targets and time-reporting in quarter-hour increments. THAT will get their systems working again.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  33. Found that server that (was) up for 24 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weren't we just talking about this thing?

  34. Insider perspective by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We may never know what happened - but airlines are coming off their holiday change freezes so I'll bet one of their releases went bad. I don't work for Delta, but I do work in the industry, including some stints at airlines. The central problem is that airlines are incredibly low-margin businesses. Yes, they charge for everything and flying is expensive, but for every last minute $1000 ticket are hundreds of people demanding the same flight for $129 and getting it, even though they barely break even on those customers. Airlines' biggest costs are fuel, labor and planes. When it comes to IT, it's just massive amounts of technical debt built on a very old core set of systems. All that customer facing tech is really driving some ancient stuff several layers deep, collecting the information and presenting it in a nice format like your phone screen. All of these abstractions, wrappers on wrappers and middleware have to work perfectly and it's a rickety tower sometimes. Also, airlines are run by MBAs who don't consider their IT a "core competency", so it either gets minimal funding or dumped off on a contractor. Often, the contractors develop stuff like the phone app or one of a billion middleware components and there are always integration issues...but the people in charge love the ability to pay someone $x to implement "that phone thing" or "the ability to do X without talking to an agent."

    With all the negatives, it's a very challenging and fun environment to work in for the right kind of person. I've been doing it for 20+ years and on balance I really like it. Resourceful types do very well in airline IT, as do IT geeks who understand and care about the business they're supporting. It's extremely frustrating at times as well, and there's way more firefighting than there should be. Typical businesses will just throw money at a problem until it goes away or they run out, which is why there are so many software tool vendors and expensive hardware systems out there. Go to an airline and tell them to spend 5 million bucks, and you can forget it unless it's required for compliance, safety related or guaranteed to return an immediate increase in revenue. Unfortunately this is where the technical debt comes from because there's never enough people, and all those people are running around putting out fires all the time. If I were working for Delta right now, I guarantee I wouldn't have been sleeping for the last 24 hours as everyone tried to figure out what had gone wrong.

    1. Re:Insider perspective by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You have an odd idea of fun to be treated as a lousy cost center without the tools to get the job done while at the same time getting disrespect for having stuff not work. I know I am kind of in that position now!

      My job maybe on the line. A freaking customer has a change freeze impacting production with another customer where they start sitting new employees in 48 hours. 2 weeks later and still no VOIP phones working due to no IP addresses on a buggy Avaya switch. Nope can't be fixed and I am in hot water where our Indian contractor only works late at night and is not familiar with our company so they can save $120 per vlan change.

      That is hell if you ask me and no one deserves to be disrespected and considered useless unless they are new and looking to gain experience or made poor life choices. If you work in IT and the MBAs are morons look elsewhere. It makes doing taping and putting sealing bandaids on older problems work for the sake of doing work.

  35. Quick OUTSOURCE NOW by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    We need a real team of Bangalore fresh graduates to fix this problem right away according to the MBAs. Those lazy cost centers in the US screwed us again!

  36. This is not the first time for Delta. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for Comair, a regional airline (now out of business) owned by Delta.

    Comair was a family-owned airline operating out of Northern Kentucky just south of Cincinnati, Ohio. They were a groundbreaking airline when self-owned, and the first to go all-jet. They did fantastically well in the 90s. In the late 90s, they were purchased by Delta and largely allowed to operate independently.

    Delta didn't know that the crew scheduling system was run on a pair of ancient IBM AIX systems in the data center. These were old computers that, when they were new, people were allowed to smoke in the data center. That should give you an idea of how old they were. They were also *very hard* to upgrade, and next to impossible to migrate to modern hardware. So management, or lack thereof, allowed them to keep running.

    Crew Scheduling, for the uninitiated, is an important thing for an airline. In the US, the FAA has very specific rules about how long a crew (Captains, First Officers, Flight Attendants) can work in any given 24 hour period. The Crew Scheduling system ran on these old systems, and tracked the schedules of literally hundreds of pilots and flight attendants. Of course, it also had to accommodate schedule changes for each crewmember. This all came to a head in December of 2004, when the systems were 18 years old. The airline had grown larger and larger, and taken on many more crewmembers.

    On Christmas Day, 2004, the scheduling system processed its 32,767th schedule change. And promptly stopped working, as the recordkeeping system (I won't call it a "database") was capable of processing a maximum of 32,767 changes due to addressing limitations. IT staff were alerted; the problem was discovered after less than an hour. There was no solution to problem, which was escalated to IT management, and then up through the executive chain until it reached Randy Rademacher, then-CEO of Comair. Rademacher made the executive decision, rightlfully, to stop operations of the airline.

    Think about that for a second. He STOPPED OPERATIONS OF AN AIRLINE. ON CHRISTMAS DAY. Stranding thousands of passengers in the Cincinnati airport. (Is there a worse place to be stranded? La Guardia perhaps?)

    To be fair, Rademacher was aware of the system's age. The new SBS system, with no limitation on schedule changes, was scheduled to go live in January 2005 (I worked on the project). He resigned before it went live.

  37. Outsource IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've asked them to email the issue, exception the problem is that the network is down.

  38. You seem like an idiot too by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    How do you know who you've recognized, pray tell?

    Now I know they are in Cleveland. And possibly know where they are working, especially if they spend a lot of time outside in an urban area like as a construction worker or day laborer.

    Nope, Election. Done deal. The wall will be yuuuuuuge.

    Sure if you want to do things the wrong way, you can base it on alternative facts instead of factual facts. Alternative facts are a lot more fun for everyone involved, due diligence is tedious.

    Every security system in the world, by itself, can be circumvented, for fucks sake. What a moron.

    Hopefully not as trivially as wall by using a ladder, rope, aircraft, tunnel or explosives.

    If it's an actual wall like made of brick then at least it can't be circumvented with 5 minutes on a moonless night and a set of bolt cutters.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire