Slashdot Mirror


This Week 'IT Issues' Ground Delta Airlines' Flights (cnbc.com)

Delta Air Lines has been forced to cancel at least 150 flights, and expects to cancel even more. But "the IT department is working to rectify the situation as soon as possible," they tweeted Sunday -- more than four hours ago. Long-time Slashdot reader SonicSpike quotes CNBC: Delta Air Lines U.S. domestic flights were grounded on Sunday evening due to automation issues, according to an advisory from the Federal Aviation Administration... "Delta teams are expeditiously working to fix a systems outage that has resulted in departure delays for flights on the ground," the airline said in the statement. "Flights in the air remain unaffected". [And their international flights were unaffected.]
Delta also grounded 2,000 flights last summer after a computer outage caused by a power outage in Atlanta. At the time Reuters reported that "Airlines will likely suffer more disruptions... because major carriers have not invested enough to overhaul reservations systems based on technology dating to the 1960s." And sure enough, just last week, another "IT issue" forced United Airlines to ground all their domestic flights.

70 of 141 comments (clear)

  1. Fall of an Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The first to go is the infrastructure as this empire rots from within.

  2. Windows 10 update? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

    Was it one of those that after auto-rebooting, it BSODs?

    1. Re:Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I suspect ransomware. They just don;t want to say so. Several airlines have been affected like this recently.

    2. Re:Windows 10 update? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, not ransom ware. Delta recently outsourced it's infra to Microsoft and 3rd party contractors. We weren't even able to log into email on the intranet during all this. Security certs out of date, and everything is now on *ugh* SharePoint. Intranet used to be fast, albeit it was organized horribly. They they announced the "new" deltanet which was all SharePoint. Now it's 4 times slower, but hey, it'll look good on a tablet and has slick animations while you're dying of old age waiting for the pages to load.

    3. Re:Windows 10 update? by Santas+L+Helper · · Score: 2

      I can tell you are an insider, and so am I. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING!!!! Now when I login to DLnet no matter the browser its a crap shoot whether or not I will login. I always get security issues left and right. The new website is pretty but what good is it if when I need to list for a flight I have to wait an unknown amount of time before I can actually get in. A horrible decision on their part and I hope they're moving away from microsoft garbage.

  3. Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and they're blaming the weather so they're not giving out hotel or food vouchers. My credit card is maxed, so this is going to be painful.

    1. Re: Got stranded in Atlanta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I work for Delta, and this is weather related so no one should get vouchers.

  4. When will it change? by imidan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How long can the airlines go on like this? Somewhere in office buildings around the country, there are MBAs and accountants working for various airlines who have compared the cost of in-house IT with the cost of outsourcing, and they all once decided that outsourcing was best. Somehow, I doubt they've included in their calculations the true frequency (and therefore cost) of IT failures that ground the entire airline for days. As these events stack up, these guys are going to have to re-evaluate their models for predicting the frequency and severity of failures, and at some point it's going to look like a good idea to have a real IT staff on-hand to keep systems working in the first place, and to deal with it when shit hits the fan.

    1. Re:When will it change? by speedplane · · Score: 1

      How long can the airlines go on like this? Somewhere in office buildings around the country, there are MBAs and accountants working for various airlines who have compared the cost of in-house IT with the cost of outsourcing, and they all once decided that outsourcing was best.

      Why does everyone assume that Delta outsourced this work abroad?

      --
      Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
    2. Re:When will it change? by imidan · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone assume that Delta outsourced this work abroad?

      I said nothing about abroad.

    3. Re:When will it change? by imidan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In fact, to enhance upon my reply from a few minutes ago, it appears that in 2006, Delta outsourced its IT operations to IBM [1]. It was a seven year agreement, so I don't know who does it now. But I doubt it's Delta.

      Assuming this is still the situation: I don't know on what continent Delta's IT people are stationed at this point, but that's hardly the issue. The issue is, wherever they are, they aren't competently managing Delta's IT infrastructure. They had a similarly airline-grounding outage in August, about six months ago.

      If management were able to recognize the value of investment in IT, they could have taken steps over the years to develop a system that isn't this fragile. Presumably, back in 2006, when they went into bankruptcy, someone convinced them that IT wasn't a "core competency" because it would save the airline a bunch of money to outsource it. Since then, they've been accumulating tech debt because nobody at HQ actually owns IT anymore... they think it's just a service that they pay for. It doesn't appear to be working out for them.

      [1] http://www.informationweek.com...?

    4. Re:When will it change? by starblazer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      DL just recently bought their software back in house Two things I know is that the Holiday development freeze is over and they do software loads occasionally. If I had to be a betting man, one of their loads went bad.

    5. Re:When will it change? by myid · · Score: 1

      DL just recently bought their software back in house

      On the web page that lists open IT jobs for Delta, most jobs are in Atlanta, GA, and a few are in Minneapolis, MN.

      I don't know how many of their IT employees are H-1Bs, though.

    6. Re: When will it change? by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

      I was more thinking along the lines of Overhaul Slashdot itsself to stop all the stupid garbage flaimbait storys that attract the kind of morons that abuse the moderation system.

    7. Re:When will it change? by ghoul · · Score: 1

      IT is important to the operation hence you outsource it to those who specialize in IT. Airports are also critical to Deltas operations. Delta doesnt try to run Airports does it?

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    8. Re: When will it change? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I was more thinking along the lines of Overhaul Slashdot itsself to stop all the stupid garbage flaimbait storys that attract the kind of morons that abuse the moderation system.

      Pay attention Alanis, that is actually fucking ironic.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    9. Re:When will it change? by lgw · · Score: 1

      It should be a mandatory law for companies to publish the number of H1B or B1 visa employees they hire in the company.

      It is the law. Also, all of their salaries are published. It used to be fun to match these salaries to specific people in the office (by hiring date, IIRC).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:When will it change? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      This. "core competency". From experience it is due to cutbacks or fiscal restraint and at the decision of management. They only want to spend on "Core" things. At one point I was more less refused promotion because my position in "IT" wasn't considered "core". In *many* occurrences I've had project funds rejected for upgrades, because they were not "core" to the business. Trying to tell a manager how functional the promoted workers that were considered "core" that use said systems, or how the business as a whole is going to function when those "non-core" systems fail is a hard sell. In most cases it isn't an abrupt change but rather a slow degradation of service as systems and support become more difficult to maintain. Over the years, you do get "tech debt" as the issues keep piling up, and in the case of positions, if they are not valued, then why stick around?

      I know I was pretty shocked and offended when I was told my position wasn't part of "core" business (I also thought it was pretty short sighted and ludicrous), and knew the writing was on the wall with that manager and in that position. Fortunately it worked out moving to a business and position where it was considered "core".

      As mentioned the system wasn't probably fragile to begin with. However any system will become so over time though neglect. I have no doubt that management due to fiscal issues did as you said. Which isn't necessarily bad, the whole system as a service when done right. However the other buzz word other than "core competency" than management loves to throw around (without seeming to understand or grasp the real meaning) is "Risk Management". Which basically means we're going to do things half-assed and accept the risk that it will bring to the table. Well that "risk" just materialized. What mitigation plans did they put in place, who is responsible for it in terms of lost revenue? I'd guess they don't have real answers for either of those questions.

    11. Re: When will it change? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Itsself as well.

      Very ironic though.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re: When will it change? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      lol thanks. I actually missed 'itsself'.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  5. Technical Debt by byteherder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is simply a case of technical debt being piled on top technical debt. Don't blame anyone but management. Marketing screaming for more features and MBAs running a business that is a large technical enterprise. 50 years of added crap on top of crap and this is what you get, IT issues, outages, "power failures", automation issues. Each one causing tens of millions is losses. What the airline industry needs is a large IT colonic and then some good design to move forward.

    You are not going to be able to fix this problem with the same thinking that got you into it.

    1. Re:Technical Debt by imidan · · Score: 2

      I think it'll be a super hard sell to get them to do a hard reboot on their whole system. But why not begin introducing a service oriented architecture that could be gradually rolled out and replace systems incrementally? Start with the most fragile systems and linkages and rebuild the whole system in situ?

      I mean, I know it'll be more complicated than that simple statement, but at least it's a better plan than trying to install better and better windproofing to prevent the house of cards from toppling.

    2. Re:Technical Debt by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Planes might be a technical enterprise. Airlines are not. They are mostly marketing and financial engineering. Everything else can and is subcontracted out.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:Technical Debt by byteherder · · Score: 1

      For an airline, the planes are the physical part of the enterprise and they need to own or lease those assets. As for IT, I would put reservations and scheduling is a critical core competency that I would never want to outsource. If those fail, you are screwed and so would never want to hand your fate to another company. Other functions like email or IT security, no reason not to subcontract them out. Marketing and financial engineering, well, most major companies these days are just marketing machines.

    4. Re:Technical Debt by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      The short answer to this is that they have probably tried and failed. These systems are so archaic and complicated that it's amazing that they work at all. In fact, trying to do what you suggest very well may have been the source of the failure!

    5. Re:Technical Debt by lgw · · Score: 1

      An airline's core enterprise is the same as Walmart's: logistics. The IT system that manages this is pretty much the whole airline. Much more than just bookings: maintaining the entire schedule of flights, along with some small pool of redundant equipment. Every airplane maintenance log and pilot hours tracking. What food to stock every flight with. It's all logistics, and without that IT system to manage it, there's no airline left. You'd think they'd act like it was important, but apparently not: just one more cost to be minimized.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Technical Debt by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Walmart as much as it is criticized has a superb highly paid IT department. They view IT as a way to minimize costs and part of the team that is core of the business.

      That is the problem with outsourcing. Sure you can say a bank is not competent to run the cafeteria so outsource that. However, IT just like delivery drivers is really part of the whole process.

      They are not a lawfirm or accounting firm either. But doesn't Walmart or Delta need competent accountants and lawyers verses shitty ones? YOU bet!

    7. Re:Technical Debt by ghoul · · Score: 1

      The assumption in your argument is in house are better. Many would say if you want the best go to a firm who specialize in IT rather than trying to build your own out of scotch tape and servers.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  6. Must have upgraded to Windows 10 by SWPadnos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Somewhere, there's a computer that's "Preparing to configure Windows" after it rebooted in the middle of a flight scheduling run.

    Or stuck at a BIOS prompt saying "No keyboard found, press F1 to continue."

    --
    - The Sigless Wonder
    1. Re:Must have upgraded to Windows 10 by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Somewhere, there's a computer that's "Preparing to configure Windows" after it rebooted in the middle of a flight scheduling run." ...And stuck in a reboot loop of "Windows Update Failed" and "Preparing Windows update."

  7. Systems from the 1960's by evolutionary · · Score: 2

    Wow, if they are so economical (cheap) they use reservation tech from that era, maybe they'd consider hiring contractors from India to give the system an overhaul. Of course the contracting firm will probably just hand it over to a bunch of juniors who will then use techniques/tech/flaws from the 1990's, but that's still an improvement, right?

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Systems from the 1960's by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Informative

      For more information, the airlines are running on TPF from IBM. IBM still updates it, so it's not ancient, and it runs on beefy modern hardware. IBM claims it's extremely stable, fwiw. However, the airlines have built up a lot of systems around it, like their online booking services, for example, and they have some middleware that they seem to have written themselves to interface with TPF. The middleware and front end systems seem to have synchronization issues.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Systems from the 1960's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bah.
      The core system can't be "extremely stable". If all that breaks is the "online booking", then the airline wouldn't be grounded. They'd fly around with planes half-full of people who bought their tickets weeks in advance - a large part of the customer base. If the online booking breaks, you can't book online. You can still book by phoning them or showing up at their desk in the airport - where the core system is used directly. And you can still show up with your two week old tickets.

      Having the web-based frontend break will sure cost them, as customers then move on to a competing airline. But it won't put all planes on the ground, unless booking stays down for a whole month. Therefore, we know the core system broke too.

    3. Re:Systems from the 1960's by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Seems like they believed you and brought the work back to US and are thus facing operational issues. IT needs a crazy work ethic or massive overstaffing to ensure everything runs soothly during the peak bug periods. Once you work with Indian companies where you staff with the minimum but stuff keeps running because folks give up their nights and weekends and then you try to bring the work back to US but with same levels of staffing you run into these problems. Either you need to have extra folks or you need to build the same work ethic into Americans (which will only happen if there is widespread poverty in America and IT workers are thankful to have a job. Trump has made a good start on that path)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
  8. Probably should have charged more by sidekick2 · · Score: 1

    If only they charged $300 per bag, maybe, just maybe they'd have enough funds to update their 1960s equipment?

    1. Re:Probably should have charged more by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If they were running 1960s equipment they would not have a problem. It's like collapsing on the floor when you pencil breaks, dude, not a problem get a sharpener and sharpen that pencil and away you go.

      The problem is companies in the insane greed who think they can completely abandon manual backups. When digital fails and it always will, always, not maybe will fail but always will fail, just a matter of when and how bad. No manual systems to fall back on and you shut down.

      The US is heading for a major fall, next time a solar flare heads their way, Complete economic collapse because it will take months to repaid because of a complete absence of manual systems to fall back on.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Probably should have charged more by Maritz · · Score: 2

      A large solar flare will take out all the transformers, so you probably won't be running much of anything, electronic or otherwise.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    3. Re:Probably should have charged more by starblazer · · Score: 1

      They have their manual backups. The problems lie in whether to start using the manual backups or just wait it out. Given a severe enough incident, they would start scribbling stuff on pencil and paper. It would just take forever and cancel about 70% of the flights because they couldn't handle the volume manually.

    4. Re:Probably should have charged more by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I doubt you have ever been involved in establishing and maintaining manual system. You can not simply scribble stuff on bits of paper. Data needs to make it from one person to another, set formats, product descriptions, needed information all need to be taken care of, no notes, not computer, no previous forms to copy, all from scratch. Those manual systems to many years to develop and training to use. Your hope for the best attitude will work after about 6 months and a percentage of the population has died from starvation, quite a large percentage, let alone medical care.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  9. Who Needs Terrorism by dave562 · · Score: 1

    When incompetence seems to do as much damage.

    I wonder how long until the airlines receive a 'modernization bailout' ^H^H^H initiative

  10. Real Reason by dohzer · · Score: 1

    Real Reason: They've got to slow down the planes because it's hectic this week. I'm not sure why the airports are crazy, but they are. Something must have happened this week so they have to slow down the traffic.

  11. DUPE! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    When will slashdot stop with all the dupes.... Wait not a dupe? Again?

  12. Best and brightest? Probably not.... by BenJeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a developer, I can't imagine even bothering to answer an offer of employment from an airline these days. I spent considerable time looking for better options last year before deciding to take an offer and leave my employer of 20 years (HPE), and there were several potential employers I did avoid; work for any airline would have been a huge red flag for me. The way they've cut corners over the last few decades would definitely not make it a good place for career advancement.

    I suspect the quality of their hires in IT would be limited by their reputation as employers and probably tend toward the desperate only looking to fill immediate financial needs on a temporary basis. I can't say this would lead to the most inspired work effort.

  13. Re:Fake News! by ghoul · · Score: 1

    Maybe the guy supposed to do the antivirus patching couldnt get back from his holiday after the ban :)

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  14. Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Why does it have to physically be a wall. Even 2000 years ago the Romans could build walls, it's not exactly high tech. Sensors, cameras, drones, patrol units, etc. are real 21st century technology. Gather information on the board and take action, not put a wall up that anyone with a ladder or ultralight aircraft can circumvent.

    How many drug kingpins have pilots on their staff? Probably all of them.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Trump understands what a wall does. He doesn't understand all that shit you just came out with. So wall it is then!

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    2. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      A physical wall (or high fence, which is fine) is important in 2 ways: it's a symbol that this is not the place to enter, and it stop people from driving in. Sure, some people will always find a way, no doubt, but not a steady stream of millions. Mostly, though it's the symbol: we're no longer ignoring immigration law.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I still hope the 2006 film Idiocracy is only an amusing bit of entertainment and doesn't turn out to be prophetic. But my hope is pretty shaken.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Why not pillars of light, Tribute in Light worked for the WTC memorial instead of rebuilding. Or so they say.

      Or we could not waste effort on building ineffective symbols. A very large portion of the US-Canada border is posted, at least the part on land.

      Don't a large number of illegal immigration enter over water, it's hard to put a fence in the ocean. Luckily we have a professional Coast Guard to do the job that a fence cannot do.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It Can't Happen Here (1935) - Sinclair Lewis had a Minute Men, which was a volunteer force that supported the fascist state but viewed themselves as patriots.

      I'm not saying Trump is a fascist, maybe a corporatist (whatever that is). But there are a lot of idiots that think fascist ideas are a bad ass cowboy way to get things done, but fascism isn't cool at all it's rather shitty and terrifying. (real cowboys would kill a fascist)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be perfect to help, is the point. Especially to help say "turn around, you're not welcome".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Or you could put up signs and posts that aren't disruptive to wildlife and property owners in the region and save taxpayers billions of dollars. It seems very ham-fisted and ineffective, it's indirectly my money so I feel like I should complain. (my representatives are all Democrats, so while I've contacted them I doubt they'll be able to alter matters any)

      If we're looking for symbols, maybe Trump could tweet about his views on immigration, and assume that most Mexicans read his tweets.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    8. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      Seems like you're really reaching for a reason not to have a wall. And it won't be "ineffective" - walls have helped to bolster the border security on nations for millennia. The idea that they're "ineffective" is farcical. No defensive measure by itself is ever adequate, and that's fine, it's the collection of such that works.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      This is the 21st century, not millennia ago.

      Numerous historic examples of large walls covering large territories that were not effective in stopping raids, soldiers or even refugees. If there is money to be made for a coyote to bring people into the US from Mexico, they'll find a way. It will be easy, you'll see.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    10. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      Do you have a lock on your front door? It's only even addresses the single most obvious path in, and it does nothing to stop a determined robber. But I'd call it "effective", because you start with the most obvious path. A wall will keep people from driving in. That's a big deal.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Is a false analogy supposed to be proof or even evidence of something? Speak plainly. I will not chase this strawman.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    12. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      The most straightforward way into your house is the door(s). Locking them is useful, even though there are many other ways into your house, the door can be kicked in, the lock can likely be opened with a "bump key", and so on. You still want a lock on your front door.

      The most straightforward way into the country illegally is to drive across the border (well, be driven by a coyote). Blocking that is useful, even though there are many other ways into the country. You still want a wall, fence, or similar physical barrier on your border.

      How was that in any way unclear?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's not even my house, you broke into Mr Strawman's house and he's pissed.

      Flying, driving, walking, climbing a ladder, without a way to detect incursions it's pointless. A barrier that I can hide behind while I dig, cut or climb my way through is not a effective. On the other hand travel over the remote parts of the board is very difficult terrain, and border agents have many miles to pick some one up before they will be able to reach a populated area and slip away. It's naive to think that crossing some imaginary line and an immigrant can declare victory, they only need to be picked up (assuming they don't pass out from dehydration, 95% of the border is rough country). If someone entered the country illegally and a camera tagged
      them for facial recognition we could wait days to pick them up and still stop more people than a wall would, and the border patrol takes hours in the worst case and minutes in the real hot zones today.

      Our unintentional creation of an industry to smuggle people into our country illegally is the bigger threat than the physical security of our border. Lax enforcement of labor laws and lack of an effective process to allow orderly legal immigration is to blame. If you're buying peaches 3 for $1 at the super market, they probably should have been closer to $3 each. A lot of employers in the chain skipped out on paying taxes and passing their costs onto the consumer (as business always do).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    14. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      without a way to detect incursions it's pointless

      Who is suggesting that the wall would be the only defense? It's an effective part of securing the border. I don't get why you have a problem with that. Any one system can be defeated by some. Defense in depth is what changes "some" to "almost none". It will never be none, of course; heck, people make it across the DMZ.

      If someone entered the country illegally and a camera tagged them for facial recognition we could wait days to pick them up and still stop more people than a wall would,

      Facial recognition only works if someone's face is already in your DB. It's very easy to disappear into the country if you don't have an established identity, bank account, residence, etc. This had been happening constantly with our "catch and release" program.

      Reduce the number of people making across the border to something manageable, and they can be caught by surveillance and met by the border patrol in trucks before they can go to ground.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Facial recognition only works if someone's face is already in your DB.

      That's not been my personal experience working in the industry of computer learning and image processing.

      I guess it's up to those who support building a wall to prove that it will work. The burden isn't really on my to prove it won't work, or we will just go around in circles in the classic proving a negative problem. I don't see how it can work, I've provided examples where it can be circumvented. End result of the wall is coyotes will charge a little more to smuggle people in, so anyone with slightly more money can still enter illegally, so net effect is essentially zero.

      Not that a discussion on slashdot means much. I'll at least be able to be smugly satisfied with an I-told-you-so, if you even remember this in 2-3 years (most aggressive case for building a wall). But the world as a whole will remain unchanged and indifferent to what we've discussed.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    16. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's not been my personal experience working in the industry of computer learning and image processing.

      How do you know who you've recognized, pray tell? Are you advocating arresting the next Mexican-American who steps in front of a government camera and their faces match up with your scan? That would be a Hell of a thing.

      I guess it's up to those who support building a wall to prove that it will work.

      Nope, Election. Done deal. The wall will be yuuuuuuge.

      , I've provided examples where it can be circumvented

      Every security system in the world, by itself, can be circumvented, for fucks sake. What a moron.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    17. Re:Trump seems like an idiot by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure your reps/senetors are against it?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Many Dems supported the last expansion. It is kind of normal for a country to want secure borders.

      https://www.senate.gov/legisla...

      Both Clinton and Obama voted Yea. This wasn't even controversial then, but now, it is Trump, so we must gnash our teeth.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  15. It doesn't always go your way by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Desperate projects in the private sector usually turn out to be Sisyphian tasks.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  16. Re:MAr;E by Maritz · · Score: 1

    So, have you not actually realised that slashdot shows the linked domain beside the link? Are you stupid?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  17. I'll bet I know what the proposed solution will be by computational+super · · Score: 1

    More meetings, more stand ups, shorter sprints, a "collaborative" open office so the boss can stare at everybody all day long, code-quality measurement targets and time-reporting in quarter-hour increments. THAT will get their systems working again.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  18. Insider perspective by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We may never know what happened - but airlines are coming off their holiday change freezes so I'll bet one of their releases went bad. I don't work for Delta, but I do work in the industry, including some stints at airlines. The central problem is that airlines are incredibly low-margin businesses. Yes, they charge for everything and flying is expensive, but for every last minute $1000 ticket are hundreds of people demanding the same flight for $129 and getting it, even though they barely break even on those customers. Airlines' biggest costs are fuel, labor and planes. When it comes to IT, it's just massive amounts of technical debt built on a very old core set of systems. All that customer facing tech is really driving some ancient stuff several layers deep, collecting the information and presenting it in a nice format like your phone screen. All of these abstractions, wrappers on wrappers and middleware have to work perfectly and it's a rickety tower sometimes. Also, airlines are run by MBAs who don't consider their IT a "core competency", so it either gets minimal funding or dumped off on a contractor. Often, the contractors develop stuff like the phone app or one of a billion middleware components and there are always integration issues...but the people in charge love the ability to pay someone $x to implement "that phone thing" or "the ability to do X without talking to an agent."

    With all the negatives, it's a very challenging and fun environment to work in for the right kind of person. I've been doing it for 20+ years and on balance I really like it. Resourceful types do very well in airline IT, as do IT geeks who understand and care about the business they're supporting. It's extremely frustrating at times as well, and there's way more firefighting than there should be. Typical businesses will just throw money at a problem until it goes away or they run out, which is why there are so many software tool vendors and expensive hardware systems out there. Go to an airline and tell them to spend 5 million bucks, and you can forget it unless it's required for compliance, safety related or guaranteed to return an immediate increase in revenue. Unfortunately this is where the technical debt comes from because there's never enough people, and all those people are running around putting out fires all the time. If I were working for Delta right now, I guarantee I wouldn't have been sleeping for the last 24 hours as everyone tried to figure out what had gone wrong.

    1. Re:Insider perspective by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You have an odd idea of fun to be treated as a lousy cost center without the tools to get the job done while at the same time getting disrespect for having stuff not work. I know I am kind of in that position now!

      My job maybe on the line. A freaking customer has a change freeze impacting production with another customer where they start sitting new employees in 48 hours. 2 weeks later and still no VOIP phones working due to no IP addresses on a buggy Avaya switch. Nope can't be fixed and I am in hot water where our Indian contractor only works late at night and is not familiar with our company so they can save $120 per vlan change.

      That is hell if you ask me and no one deserves to be disrespected and considered useless unless they are new and looking to gain experience or made poor life choices. If you work in IT and the MBAs are morons look elsewhere. It makes doing taping and putting sealing bandaids on older problems work for the sake of doing work.

  19. Quick OUTSOURCE NOW by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    We need a real team of Bangalore fresh graduates to fix this problem right away according to the MBAs. Those lazy cost centers in the US screwed us again!

  20. Re:Fake News! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Alternate Facts are already dominating the narrative. People get held up by customs all the time. Liberals only start to care when they can blame Trump. They don't care about Ukranian grannies getting deported. They're oblivious.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  21. You seem like an idiot too by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    How do you know who you've recognized, pray tell?

    Now I know they are in Cleveland. And possibly know where they are working, especially if they spend a lot of time outside in an urban area like as a construction worker or day laborer.

    Nope, Election. Done deal. The wall will be yuuuuuuge.

    Sure if you want to do things the wrong way, you can base it on alternative facts instead of factual facts. Alternative facts are a lot more fun for everyone involved, due diligence is tedious.

    Every security system in the world, by itself, can be circumvented, for fucks sake. What a moron.

    Hopefully not as trivially as wall by using a ladder, rope, aircraft, tunnel or explosives.

    If it's an actual wall like made of brick then at least it can't be circumvented with 5 minutes on a moonless night and a set of bolt cutters.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire