Microsoft's Coming Windows 10 Cloud Release May Have Nothing To Do With the Cloud (zdnet.com)
Last week, several users spotted a mention of "Windows Cloud" in Windows 10 inside builds, speculating if it is a new version of Windows 10 which will stream from Azure. That's not the case, according to long-time Microsoft journalist Mary Jo Foley. From a report: Windows 10 Cloud is a simplifed version of Windows 10 that will be able to run only Unified Windows Platform (UWP) apps installed from the Windows Store, my contacts say. Think of it as being similar to the version of Windows 10 formerly known as Windows RT or the Windows 8.1 with Bing SKU. Windows 10 Cloud is meant to help Microsoft in its ongoing campaign to attempt to thwart Chromebooks with a simpler, safer, cheaper version of Windows 10, my contacts say, though Microsoft is unlikely to position it that way (publicly). Windows 10 Cloud seemingly has little or nothing to do with the cloud.
Still as unwanted and unnecessary as ever.
So Windows 10 Cloud is a merely a more crippled version of Windows 10 that only runs Windows Stores Apps (formerly known as Metro apps). Thankfully there are lots of useful apps from Windows Store . . . not. [sarcasm] How people must be camping out to get Windows 10 Cloud.[/sarcasm]
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
I have a tablet with "Windows 8.1 with Bing SKU". It runs legacy Win32 programs just fine. This does not appear to be anything like that except for being free/cheap to bundle.
Microsoft has long been interested in becoming a service provider. Initially the idea was to get paid monthly or annually for the use of their software (Windows, Office, etc.) but recently it seems that they are more interested in becoming a distributor of other publisher's software, where they offer a standardized platform (Windows OS, UWP apps, Azure) for developers to target and they get a cut of the proceeds. To ensure that they could provide the largest market, the platform the end-users use would be offered free (hence, Windows10). Windows 10 Cloud just seems to be a furtherment of this objective, albeit stripped down to lessen the cost to Microsoft (and possibly to ensure that end-users would /have/ to use the app-store if they want to get anything done by not providing any built-in applications).
Want to compete with Chromebooks? Offer something with a key differentiator. Provide the server part of the software as well as the client. A Chromebook is fine if you completely trust Google with all of your data, making something where you have to completely trust Microsoft with your data isn't really a selling point. A lot of companies would love to have something like a Chromebook (centrally managed updates, remote self destruct, network storage working out of the box) but where they kept the server part in house. Microsoft could easily offer this (and even Azure hosting for the server part if you decided you did trust Microsoft, but wanted a bit more control than a fully managed solution), but instead they keep trying to compete with Google on Google's own terms. I don't really miss the predatory monopolistic Microsoft, but it's a bit sad that the company now seems to be run by people who don't understand basic business.
I am TheRaven on Soylent News
Just like .NET back in the day. Took a few years for that one to go away.
My local cloud is a FreeNAS file server. Stores my data just fine. It even works with the Adobe apps I paid for ten years ago.
I don't understand you. The possible uses of this new OS are... cloudy. How much more could you have to do with clouds than that?
>> Windows 10 that will be able to run only ...apps installed from the Windows Store. Think of it as being similar to the version of Windows 10 formerly known as Windows RT or the Windows 8.1 with Bing SKU.
No, think of it as Windows Phone...without the phone.
Because Windows XP will always outnumber Windows Trump.
Windows 10 cloud will badly suck ass. Abusing users by further locking them into their shitty, useless, underpowered, user-unfriendly ecosystem will make Windows 10 cloud as successful/popular a product as Windows phone was, but you can bet it still won't stop Microsoft from trying to force it down everyones throats.
Its truly amazing how Microsoft can keep crippling/removing more and more functionality in ever more blatant drive to lock customers in tighter and tighter, yet most people just keep buying Windows anyway. I will be VERY surprised if Microsoft forcing this dick move on people isn't the straw that breaks the camels back. Of course Microsoft will just blame/interpret poor sales on the general decline of the PC rather than their supremely shitty OS.
"Local cloud" finds buy-in with Gov IT monkey. No surprise here.
I'm not an H1B contractor.
Hay dood, if I dump a shit in the street, do you know the guy who cleans it up? Oh and I don't pay taxes either. Shit's crowning, it'll be a fucking big one. Thanks!
Is that you, Mr. Trump?
This is the new Windows RT. No one asked for it. Few will want it. Microsoft comes up with another loser offset to Chromebooks. Schools by me will stick with Chromebook as Windows left a bad taste, due to the time and effort it takes to manage it. Chromebooks are very easy to manage.
Windows Command Line Home Edition 10.2 now featuring CMD, PowerShell and BASH for all your kiddie scripting needs!
Seriously, how many articles about that CrapOS can you bring per month?!?!
Indeed. I think it is high time to have a browser add-on to filter out articles about that trash.
This is the appiest version of Appdows 10! Only LUDDITES would want the LUDDITE version of LUDDITE Windows 10!
Apps!
Sounds like MSFT has realized that only putting the DRM/lockdown features on the ARM Windows RT tablets only had the effect of making those tablets not sell. By making it universal, now it doesn't matter if you have X86 or ARM, everyone gets locked down the same way. My guess is the primary reason for this move is so Microsoft can charge manufactures $10 per Windows license instead of $60, and then if you want to unlock your device and actually make it useful you have to go login to the Windows store and shell out the $50 to make all the software you actually care about work. Now that they have the X86->ARM emulator, they can treat all devices the same way from a licensing standpoint and turn this is to a pure profit generator.
I also suspect that we will now see the subscription charges for Windows 10 materialize. Everyone who upgraded from Windows 7 has either the Home or Pro edition right now. But once Jan. 14, 2020 comes (end of Win7 support) anyone who upgraded to Win10 gets downgraded to Cloud edition. On Jan. 10, 2023 everyone who upgraded from Windows 8 (end of Win8 support) will have the same thing happen. At that point, you can expect to pay $50 to the Windows store get another 10 years on the Home edition or $100 for the Pro edition. Or you can just go buy a new computer which comes with 10 years of either Home or Pro from the time of initial activation.
Also, you can expect on Jan. 10, 2023 (end of Win8 support) that MSFT will completely drop support for booting on non-UEFI computers.
Not sure what you mean by "a few years".
I went back to school to learn computer programming after the dot com bust. The computer labs in the CIS department had Visual Studio 6 installed. I had Visual Studio .NET 2002 or .NET 2003 installed at home. The school eventually upgraded to Visual Studio 2005.
I'm *really* hoping you're not so misinformed as to think it "went away".
I work in IT support. A month doesn't go by without a .NET patch failing to install properly on multiple systems.
I read the summary 3 times... it makes no sense. I read the article... still no help.
What is this? Is this supposed to be one of those announcements that creates buzz? If I, as a tech person, don't get it then how will anyone else?
Several months ago I was in the Microsoft Store in a mall. I didn't even know they HAD Microsoft stores, and I hadn't been in a Mall for 10 years. So it was like a "things I despise" turducken. But my son's scout troop was in there doing a thing where they did game design. It was very lame, and he didn't have any fun. But while he was doing it, I sat and marveled at the Microsoft Store. They were really trying. Glitz and shiny things. Big screens, a VR! There were actual customers in there, which surprised me.
But I overheard a young, hip salesperson trying to sell an Office subscription to a middle-aged man, and she was really trying to get him to understand how it worked. There was a physical package on the shelf, and he could buy the 3 month subscription, take it home and then go to the website and register. He wanted to know how he installed it, and she explained he didn't. He wasn't getting it (and quite honestly, I wasn't either) She kept steering him towards a 12 month subscription - to something he didn't understand how to use. It was comical. He eventually gave up and left.
Good ol' Microsoft. They understand business - get in, sign the deals, make sure they are locked in. They understand oems - become the only thing they use, and make sure there are no other options. They understand acquisitions - buy things that are successful. They sure don't understand how to be relevant beyond those three things. And actually, I am not sure they really need to, but they keep trying.
My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.
In related news: Man, 32, discovers his life had been meaningless. Minnesota woman finds remote her husband lost last week.
...in that it has more to do with malware than to an actual OS.
MS wants to deprecate Win32.
Twinstiq, game news
They should have called it "Windows 10 No Spyware edition!" Then maybe someone would buy it. lol
Not good enough. I want an iCloud.NET system, installed personally by a Gates hologram. On second thoughts forget the last bit.
If anyone is looking for a paired down version of Windows without paying for it Hyper-V 2012 server is apparently free. Doesn't come with management tools but you can connect from a workstation and install and run normal win32 software.
So this. I remember listening to two Microsoft guys a long time ago, and one of them asked the other, "what is .net to you?". Neither one knew what it really was.
Not as prevalent, but I also remember Microsoft muddying the waters with XML vs Java, and speaking of XML as if it were a programming language that would supersede java at the time.
They should be banned from using the english language.