Slashdot Mirror


Woman Built House From the Ground Up Using Nothing But YouTube Tutorials (digitaltrends.com)

schwit1 quotes a report from Digital Trends: In this generation of self-starters and self-made women and men, do-it-yourself isn't just an option, it's a way of life. And if there's not an app for that, chances are there's a YouTube video for it. That was certainly the case for a woman named Cara Brookins, who is living proof that if you're willing to learn, you absolutely can. In 2008, Brookins was in the midst of a family struggle, having left a husband she called "violent and abusive." Looking to make a fresh start for herself, she took the idea of rebuilding quite literally, perhaps using the physical experience of constructing a house as an extension of her emotional and mental journey. Though she had no previous experience in construction or architecture, Brookins found a series of YouTube tutorials on building a home and got to work. Over the course of nine months, Brookins worked tirelessly with the help of her four children to build a new home for themselves. "I had rented this cabin for a Thanksgiving getaway," the mother of four told CBS News. "And driving there, we passed this house that had been ravaged by a tornado. It was this beautiful dream house and it was sort of wide open. You don't often get the opportunity to see the interior workings of a house, but looking at these 2x4s and these nails, it just looked so simple. I thought, "I could put this wall back up if I really tried. Maybe I should just start from scratch.'"

22 of 315 comments (clear)

  1. No materials then? by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stupid headline

    1. Re:No materials then? by mjwx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stupid headline

      No, it's a headline that isn't meant for stupid people.

      You see, language is contextual, you're expected to be smart enough to fill in the gaps by using the context of the sentence. Obviously by mentioning "YouTube Tutorials" we're talking about educational resources, not building material.

      If language did rely on people understanding context it would take ages to explain a simple concept, headlines would look like legal briefs as every possible explanation is covered off to avoid any ambiguity. I don't know about you, but I don't want to live on planet of the lawyers.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:No materials then? by synaptik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's a joke that isn't meant for stupid people.

      You see, language is ambiguous; you're expected to be smart enough to realize when someone is exploiting that ambiguity with humorous intent, to evoke mirth in their audience.
      If language wasn't ambiguous, whole swaths of comedy would be eliminated and we'd be stuck with nothing but pedants trying to explain to us how we misinterpreted a headline.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
  2. ok by bigdavex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet she used some bricks or wood or something, too.

    --
    -Dave
  3. What about electrical, plumbing etc? by jonwil · · Score: 5, Informative

    I dont know how it works elsewhere but here in Australia there are a number of jobs (electrical work, plumbing, telecom work and others) that you can't legally do unless you have the right license.

    1. Re:What about electrical, plumbing etc? by Sarlok · · Score: 5, Informative

      That depends on state and city laws. In a lot of places a homeowner is allowed to do any work themselves on their own home. So I could do electrical and plumbing work on my own house (and in fact I have), but I could not do electrical work on someone else's house or a commercial building without being a licensed electrician.

    2. Re:What about electrical, plumbing etc? by Sarlok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I get paid and the new owner takes possession. I have to disclose and problems with the house in a seller's disclosure, but no special notification is required for any work I have done myself. It's common for buyers to hire a professional home inspector that will make sure everything works and look for signs of potential problems, including going in the attic (or crawl space if there was one) to look at utilities. They'll spot things that may not be up to current code and let the buyer know.

    3. Re: What about electrical, plumbing etc? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah. I actually built my house mostly from youtube videos also. For licensed work like electrical, you can do the majority of work yourself (60 hours) and then hire a licensed electrician to inspect the work and do the final connection (4 hours) - $360 instead of $3000. The codes in my area are probably not as strict as in a major city, but there are still building codes that follow national guidelines (like NEC)

      I originally had the idea that I would build a house with craigslist free materials, but gave up quickly on the idea because it was taking a long time to find the parts I needed...though I'm certain that it could be done. It's not a tiny house either.

    4. Re:What about electrical, plumbing etc? by Highdude702 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Same in the US although home owners are typically exempt from a lot of things, the paperwork alone would cost 3 out of the 9 months the article says it took with plenty of weeks in between construction where you have to wait for an inspector to come before proceeding to the next (unless you're a professional and know your schedule in advance, you have to schedule them when you actually finished a portion or risk having to pay for a second visit).

      Ok so i actually am a licensed electrician. And to tell you the truth when you do Owner-Builder it is 100% identical to if you were a contractor. You pull a building permit(normally valid for 180 days, but you can get extensions. I have seen projects span almost 10 years) With that permit is a fee, That fee includes initial inspection of all facets of the permit. You only have to repay on a Fail. You have that 180 days to get all work done(there is a certain order) But as i said you can get extensions. And when you call your inspection in normally if youre before 4pm that day it will be handled the next business day. There is no "plenty of weeks in between construction where you have to wait for an inspector"

    5. Re:What about electrical, plumbing etc? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just out of interest, what happens if you sell your house?

      In every jurisdiction I know of, this type of new construction requires several government inspections to make sure it is up to code. They inspect the drains and rebar before you pour concrete. They inspect the plumbing and wiring before you put up drywall. Etc. I have seen plenty of professional contractors fail these inspections for pretty obvious deficiencies. So it is likely that her work is at least as good as theirs. What she lacks in knowledge she makes up in actually-giving-a-shit, since it is her own house.

    6. Re:What about electrical, plumbing etc? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I doubt very much you are allowed to do your or gas, electrical or plumbing."

      *Cough* Agricultural exemptions, which covers about 65% of the total USA land area...

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    7. Re: What about electrical, plumbing etc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      During my training as an electrician I was advised to never sign off on an amateur installation. Refuse the job and walk away - the liability is just not worth it. We were shown some quite grisly photographs of the aftermath of untrained DIYers trying to cut corners on cost by cutting out professional work where it is most needed. They all thought that they were being rather smart and saving money.

      Don't play around with electricity - get a proper professional to do the job.

    8. Re: What about electrical, plumbing etc? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 3, Informative
      Most of the hours are equivalent to the software engineering equivalent of grunt work - publishing specs, making sure that code meets coding standards, etc...something you can give to an intern to do at $25/hr vs your 25 years experience $75/hr/ - Drilling holes in studs, running cable, installing outlet boxes and light fixtures.

      If you've had a physics class and can read the building codes (not easy to find), you can correctly size the wire and do everything else without much difficulty. Let the electrician do the final connections at the breaker box. That's a few minutes of work. Hanging the fuse box and getting the wires to all fit in neatly is a PITA and takes a long time, but not a job you can screw up unless you break the shielding, or have enough shielding extending beyond the strain reliefs, or not having strain reliefs. Stuff you can pick up through a few hours of study.

    9. Re: What about electrical, plumbing etc? by Oligonicella · · Score: 5, Informative

      None of the above. It's an attempt to close off private work and coerce the use of pro or union labor. And one cannot assume the pro did it correctly so there's no more danger than with final inspection on a professional installation. If it passes it's right.

    10. Re: What about electrical, plumbing etc? by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Interesting

      something you can give to an intern to do at $25/hr vs your 25 years experience $75/hr

      That's a great example, since fixing interns' mistakes has made my years of experience very profitable.

      Sure, an intern can write the software spec, unless he doesn't understand the difference between a Widget and a Wotsit, and doesn't even realize that there are two different things. With sufficient minimal skill, he can flub his way through a basic review (often done by other intern-quality folks) and get the spec published, then be long gone with his credit and job offer once the complaints start coming in.

      Similarly, an amateur electrician can screw things up in ways that aren't obvious, like pulling wires through conduit roughly enough to strip insulation. Sure, it's working fine now, but in a few years, it could very well be a fire risk. Another particularly egregious example from my own experience is seeing a ground wire attached with an eye terminal with a nylon washer (instead of a star washer) on one side and a painted (instead of conductive) surface on the other. The connection at the terminal's edge was enough to make a connectivity meter happy, but in an emergency that poor connection could have been lethal.

      [Grunt work] takes a long time, but not a job you can screw up unless...

      ...you don't have the experience to know that what you're doing is wrong.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    11. Re:What about electrical, plumbing etc? by jabuzz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lots of people, and why not. It's first fix. You run all the wires to where they are going to go, when you have easy access to drill holes through the timber framing and pull the wires. You then put up the plasterboard or potentially if you live somewhere where houses are not made from match wood, the base-coat plaster is applied to any brick/block walls, and then the whole lot is skimmed. After that you then come back for second fix which is where the cable is cut back, ends stripped and actual sockets and switches are installed. In the UK this is is standard practice, and I imagine it is in most countries.

      Heck for a quality job this is almost necessary because you will need to install a support for a metal back box. Sure you can cut a hole in the plasterboard and stick one of those pieces of junk plastic ones that will break the first time the socket gets a whack when something is plugged in but that is not a quality job. A quality job has a timber support added between the timber framing and a metal back box screwed to that which can't easily be done once the plasterboard is installed.

  4. Re:pull yourself up by your massive amounts of mon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you say is largely true about the people in the minimum wage sector of society, but you should have read the article before ranting.

    She and her children are obviously smart and hard working. Having BOTH these characteristics is the advantage she has over those who will never get out of their situation.
    I cannot understand what is wrong with you that you would say "but she didnt pull herself up by anything, by definition, because she had time and money to build a fucking house." Your statement is contrary to fact. Learn To Read.

    I used to teach at a community college and we had so many students just as you described - minimum wage, kids, and black eyes and bruises. And not all single parents are female. And not everyone with the minimum wage job that decides to improve themselves is abused.
    They took classes whenever they could to get a skill for a real job. They, too, pulled themselves up with brains and work just like the story above. Every single semester right here in America. And yeah, lots of them failed to finish.
    I'm sorry that your friends can't get out of their ruts, but everyone in America is told almost from birth what the game is, how to play it, and most important, how not to play it.

    Here's what you missed by not reading the article:

    So, over the course of the next nine months, Brookins, a 110-pound computer analyst, and her four kids built their dream home from the ground up. They did everything from hand-mixing the mortar for the foundation to running gas lines and framing walls. And while it wasn’t easy, they persevered.

    “It hurt,” she told CBS News. “It was not something that was a great match to us physically, but my kids got up every day and they came out here. I was working all day and they were in school, and we would work into the night sometimes by headlights. It was incredibly intense. There was nobody going to the movies. There were no dates, no hanging out. It was all hands on deck.”

  5. That's certainly my preference by raymorris · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Fuck females

    I certainly prefer that to the alternative.

    I suspect that your subject line may be something you have little experience doing, though.

  6. Re:Fuck females. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never really understand comments like this. My mother was smart and handy. Growing up she taught me lots of useful around the house skills. Painting, plumbing, electrical work.

    Must be kinda sad being threatened by competent women all your life.

  7. Re: Pffff by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's not the point of the story. It's about child labour and the great things you can achieve with it (as the chinese have proven gazillion times).

  8. Re: Sexist by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But it might help inspire other women in abusive relationships. So it's worth mentioning anyway.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  9. Re:Sexist by jandersen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So not only the fact that she's a woman matters in this story, it's also important to throw some suspicion on her story of domestic violence.

    I think so - domestic violence very often leaves the survivor with little self-confidence, and the fact that she has managed to not only pick herself up and leave a violent man, but had enough pluck to take on a demanding challenge like this, is remarkable - and perhaps inspiring to others in her situation too. Perhaps what she did was just the right thing; doing practical, hard work can be a real therapy, and the sense of achievement is pure gold. Any engineer knows this.